Nicholas Cox Writes A Truly Disturbing Article
My friends, I don’t know what to think about today’s article in the Barbados Advocate, Barbados Is No Zimbabwe.
Is Nicholas Cox defending the government? Is he making a plea to the world for help about government oppression of the media in Barbados? Or is he slyly doing both?
On one side, I am astounded that those in power would allow the Barbados Advocate to mention the fact that citizens in daily conversations are comparing Prime Minister Arthur to Zimbabwe’s Robert Mugabe. This has been happening increasingly in street conversations for about the last six months or so, but rapidly escalated with the government clampdown on Voice of Barbados Radio after talkshow host David Ellis made the mistake of asking Minister of Tourism Noel Lynch about his assets and integrity legislation. (See BFP’s articles Corruption Stories Being Hidden By Barbados Media & Government and also Barbados Government Blog Publishes Threats Against Journalist David Ellis)
Today’s article rightly points out that Mugabe is using murder, violence and threats of violence to silence the media and political opposition and that Barbados cannot be compared with Zimbabwe in this regard – but the article does compare the two countries in context, saying…
Whatever concerns Barbadians have about issues such as freedom of the press, transparency, and accountability of public officials, it is fair to say that the situation is nowhere near as dire as what is happening in Zimbabwe. Yes, many in Barbados, including myself, support the implementation of laws to facilitate the aforementioned issues, but to date, as a journalist, I have not been beaten to a pulp or threatened for voicing these opinions, as is likely to happen in Zimbabwe.
… David Cox in the Barbados Advocate.
“Nowhere Near As Dire As What Is Happening In Zimbabwe”
What an astounding statement to be printed by the Barbados Advocate!
Nicholas Cox is correct, the situation in Barbados is “nowhere near as dire as what is happening in Zimbabwe” but neither is everything just fine and dandy either. By the end of the article, Cox leaves the door open for the reader to assume that he believes a Zimbabwe situation is not out of the realm of possibility in Barbados…
“…if Barbados or any other government in the region decides to follow a similar path of oppression and intimidation, hopefully world leaders will condemn this as well, in the interest of the people that are suffering.”
Cox also throws a few bones to the government censors by saying…
“Furthermore, we should not use the issues that will undoubtedly be raised in a democratic country like Barbados, where at least there is the power to question and uncover the aforementioned problems, as well as free and fair elections, to make light of the rapidly deteriorating situation because of the dictatorship in Zimbabwe.”
“Free and Fair Elections” ????
As an experienced journalist, Nicholas Cox is well aware of the vote-buying and ballot-box stuffing that goes on in Barbados. He knows that the government unethically and unfairly put it’s new candidate Jeffrey Bostic in charge of a programme to hand out millions of dollars of free home renovations. He knows that we have no campaign finance laws and the the Prime Minister was recently caught depositing a $750,000 payoff, oops “campaign donation”, into his personal bank account.
Cox knows all these things and more. He knows that for the last 13 years, the Barbados Advocate has not published even one serious article of investigative reporting on Barbados political corruption. His paper didn’t even mention the three-quarters of a million dollar cheque that the Prime Minister put into his personal bank account, even though the information was revealed publicaly in Parliament and the Prime Minister admitted to it.
In the end, what I find so disturbing about the article in the Barbados Advocate is that Nicholas Cox is correct – one cannot compare what is happening in Barbados with what is currently happening in Zimbabwe.
But one can certainly compare what is happening in Barbados now with events at the beginning of Mugabe’s reign. It all started in Zimbabwe with repression of free speech in the media, intimidation of journalists through lawsuits and forced public “apologies”, newspaper editors being “advised” to fire columnists… until the media became silent about blatant corruption by government officials.
And it escalated from there.
We have all those conditions in place here in Barbados.
Journalists are intimidated. Columnists have been fired upon government “advice”, and citizens fear to speak out about obvious corruption of government officials. To ask a government minister how it is that his personal assets are so at odds with his salary is to have the full wrath of government descend upon the journalist and his media organization.
No… Barbados isn’t Zimbabwe, but it is how Zimbabwe once was.
Barbados Is No Zimbabwe
Barbados Advocate, April 9, 2007
Nicolas Cox
In recent weeks, in unofficial circles, there have been numerous comparisons between the socio-political situation in Barbados with that of the African nation of Zimbabwe.
These critics see Barbados as a mini-dictatorship heading in the same direction as Zimbabwe under the leadership of Robert Mugabe, and this is mainly based on the power, or lack thereof, of the media to question public officials issues like corruption.
Whatever concerns Barbadians have about issues such as freedom of the press, transparency, and accountability of public officials, it is fair to say that the situation is nowhere near as dire as what is happening in Zimbabwe. Yes, many in Barbados, including myself, support the implementation of laws to facilitate the aforementioned issues, but to date, as a journalist, I have not been beaten to a pulp or threatened for voicing these opinions, as is likely to happen in Zimbabwe.
Furthermore, we should not use the issues that will undoubtedly be raised in a democratic country like Barbados, where at least there is the power to question and uncover the aforementioned problems, as well as free and fair elections, to make light of the rapidly deteriorating situation because of the dictatorship in Zimbabwe.
Over the last few weeks, opposition members in Zimbabwe have been beaten and threatened and at least one journalist killed for daring to act out against Mugabe’s regime. According to an article in the New York Times yesterday, “The main faction of the leading opposition group, the Movement for Democratic Change, says that at least 500 of its members have been attacked in the last month. The number of attacks on civic advocates and other opposition figures is less clear but appears substantial.”
Some of those attacked are left with fractured skulls or broken limbs. A few have been shot. At least one has been killed: a week ago, a 65-year-old former cameraman for the state-controlled Zimbabwe Broadcasting Corporation was found bludgeoned to death in a field 50 miles from his home in Glenview, a south Harare slum that is a locus of anti-government sentiment. He was rumoured to have sold a videotape showing anti-government protestors being assaulted by police to foreign broadcasters.
I have been criticised in the past, by a local pan-Africanist who was unapologetic for supporting Mugabe, for receiving information about Zimbabwe from biased Western sources that only seek to portray the country in a negative light. However, I believe it is clear that the Mugabe government is going to extreme and inhumane lengths to stifle any opposition it faces.
The longer this situation is allowed to continue, the worse it will become. With only a vague mention of the incidents coming from South Africa’s President, Thabo Mbeki, and no official condemnation from the African Union, it is time for leaders in the this part of the world to speak out against Mugabe’s dictatorial actions. In this vein, if Barbados or any other government in the region decides to follow a similar path of oppression and intimidation, hopefully world leaders will condemn this as well, in the interest of the people that are suffering.
… while you can, read the original article online at The Barbados Advocate (link here). The Barbados Advocate removes online articles after a short time and keeps no public archives.