Updated April 18, 2011
Well folks, it looks like we can’t get a straight answer from Attorney Donna Symmonds or her client. Yup, Symmonds was in the mood to sue the heck out of poor old BFP until we started asking some very basic questions about whether her client had properly reported to the tax people.
Alright, we’ll put this article back into the list and that will be that.
Don’t know why it’s so difficult for some folks to just tell the truth straight up. It would be good if Bajans knew for certain whether the charges against the lawyer client were her carelessness or improper actions by government workers.
Updated April 15, 2011:
Bajans await a straight answer from Attorney Donna Symmonds or her client.
Weasel words from Attorney insider?
Attorney-at-law avoiding the truth?
Government tax authorities unfairly maligned by Attorney?
This story is gaining legs and certainly has the interest of our readers who want to know if the Attorney-at-Law “client” who is the subject of our story was unfairly charged by Barbados tax authorities or, as is looking ever more possible – was responsible for her own troubles.
At the center of the story is the question as to when “the client” who was charged with tax offenses (and who is an attorney at law herself) notified the Barbados tax authorities that she was no longer resident in Barbados.
If she properly notified the tax authorities years ago in writing and the government fouled up, then Bajans deserve to know about this unreasonable harassment by government officials.
But if the attorney at law “client” only notified the tax authorities after she was charged, and after ignoring years of tax demand letters, that means that the tax charges were fairly laid and that the attorney-at-law is hardly an innocent victim.
We’ve been trying to discover the truth, but so far all we get is silence and anonymous weasel words left as comments by an obvious insider.
The longer that Attorney at Law Donna Symmonds remains silent on this issue while screaming loudly about charges being dropped, the more it looks like the Attorney At Law “client” was charged due to her own negligence.
As we originally wrote to Attorney Donna Symmonds:
“Folks would like to know whether the fault is the government’s or your client’s and it would only be ethical to let the public know. That’s only fair to the government workers.
I mean, if it’s not the government’s fault, you wouldn’t want the public thinking it was, would you?”
Bajans await a straight answer from Attorney Donna Symmonds or her client.
Our original article published April 14, 2011…
“Our apology appears a little later in this article.”
Attorney says Client’s Charges Dropped! The Nation failed to report that all charges were dropped.
Why did Barbados lawyer Donna Symmonds publish a public letter on the internet instead of sending a private email?

Donna Symmonds (courtesy BBC)
Dear Attorney Donna Symmonds,
We just noticed today that you posted a letter to BFP as a public comment on April 11, 2011 on our story New Barbados Tourism Authority Director charged with tax evasion? (Your public comment is repeated at the end of this article.) Continue reading →