David Ames: Stupid? Crooked? …or smart like a fox?
Would you trust your money to a man so foolish that he paid tens of millions of dollars to a building contractor without signing a written contract?
Would you trust your financial future to a man who ‘managed’ investors’ money by holding million-dollar promotional events while not bothering to ask how toilets at the resort could flush if they weren’t hooked up to any sewerage lines? Would you trust a man who was such an idiot that he failed to monitor expenditures vs. observed results on a 100 million dollar project?
An Irish court has just awarded Harlequin Property a rather shameful victory – for in order to achieve victory in the civil lawsuit, Harlequin had to show and admit how much of a trusting idiot is their glorious leader, Dave Ames.
“Harlequin said between 2008 and June 2010 £8.5million was diverted from £34million paid to the contractor to develop the first phase of its flagship resort Buccament Bay, in St Vincent.
The court heard during a 31-day trial there was no written contract and money was diverted into personal accounts of Mr O’Halloran to fund lavish purchases, including a wedding, private jet, a racecourse in St Lucia, a car franchise business and renovations to a rented property on the Sandy Lane estate in Barbados.
Harlequin said during construction shells of the buildings went up but they were not connected to essential infrastructure like sewage, water and power leading to the resort opening late and on a smaller scale.”
“(Judge) McGovern said it was “extraordinary” there was no written contract for such a large development and that turned out to be a “very poor” decision by Mr Ames…”
… from the Basildon News article Harlequin Property wins civil fraud case against former resort builder
Dave Ames establishing a defense against Ponzi charges?
According to the Basildon News, Harlequin and Ames took about 6,000 deposits from investors for off plan resort accommodation at six planned resorts, but built just 300.
Couple those figures with a total failure to account for missing millions of dollars, and you have what is commonly called a ‘Ponzi Scheme’, named after the patron saint of fraudsters: Charles Ponzi. Wikipedia explains ponzi this way…
“A Ponzi scheme is a fraudulent investment operation that pays returns to its investors from their own money or the money paid by subsequent investors, rather than from profit earned by the individual or organization running the operation. The Ponzi scheme usually entices new investors by offering higher returns than other investments, in the form of short-term returns that are either abnormally high or unusually consistent. Perpetuation of the high returns requires an ever-increasing flow of money from new investors to keep the scheme going.”
That’s Harlequin Properties alright.
But what if David Ames had a plan to conduct a Ponzi scheme to take tens of millions from investors – but wanted to make it seem he was incompetent, not a crook? Wouldn’t what happened with Padraig O’Halloran take care of any allegations of criminal intent? You can hear the defense claim coming: “Ames had no criminal intent. He was an idiot. A good salesman, but a lousy business man who was in over his head and overly trusting of people around him.”
Yes, that might work in a court.
David Ames: Stupid? Too trusting? A victim …. or smart like a fox with millions tucked away all over the world?
Charles Ponzi would be so proud!



Pingback: Harlequin wins lawsuit against Padraig O’Halloran by proving Dave Ames is unfit to manage your money | Barbados Blog !
BFP – Thank you for a rational/reasoned editorial. One thing that
stands out is the difference between the reward and the amount
of the claim. As in all things Harlequin….the figures don’t add up.
This is most definitely a Ponzi scheme if ever there was one!
Why would Dave Ames inflate local St Vincent property prices by 400% and tell investors that they would get a 70% mortgage, knowing that no bank would touch it, even if he HAD approached them?
Why would he claim that a well known land owner in Barbados was guaranteeing 10% rental income for 5 years, when this person knew nothing about it?
Why did he create a purchase contract that could be changed by him at any time?
Why did he set up a company in the Caribbean to market the cabanas and apartments, and then put the deposits in a different account?
Why did he need to employ an army of lawyers to protect him?
Why did he pay Agents 10% commission of investors money to sell?
Why have all the original Agents now stopped selling?
Why when he was a twice bankrupt double glazing salesman with no money end up with massive personal assets?
Why has he now put the UK sales company into liquidation and yet claims that he can continue to build as he retains his assets in the Caribbean?
I think it speaks for itself???
Sadly true.
However, what would you do if you invested say £100,000 cash and there was a viable rescue plan in-place that booted Ames out.
Some people are in that position, so what would you do then?
And you don’t have £7k for the Crozier yet to be prooved method?
Looks like you would be a bit dumb, if you invested and did not put your claim in?
All,
The Liability of SIPPs
We have instructed counsel to provide us a further technical advice on what liabilities SIPP advisers vis a vis Harlequin investments.
We have reliable sources which tell us that some of the SIPPs that now value Harlequin Property investments at £1 were releasing new money in March 2013. This date is crucial as it is after the January 2013 FSA alert.
The £1 valuation is for regulatory purposes and will effect the value of investors pension pots across the board.
The standard SIPP we have seen hold nearly all investor monies in Harlequin Property or similar unregulated schemes.
The SIPPs allowing monies out in March 2013 and now writing down to £1 per investor have some explaining to do. What is their rationale for losing such value in such a short space of time ?
Pension Transfers
Some of the transfers are very poor. Final salary schemes (NHS/ teachers / Post Office / Police) are being transferred in to SIPP to allow onward investment into more esoteric funds.
The advice is entirely driven to achieve an investment in Harlequin Property. The clear problem for Harlequin Property is that it did not provide the advice to pension investors. The responsibility for that rests with the adviser.
Many advisers suffer terrible amnesia when asked to justify their Harlequin advice. They insist that the client wanted the investment on an “execution only” basis – eg no advice. This wriggling is unedifying as it is clearly untrue.
One other concern for investors is the number of advisers who are seeking to cease trading. In the last week alone we have objected to the dissolution of three advisory companies at Companies House.
Act before the insurance ceases
Insurance on many advisers will cease at renewal. Act quickly. We have no intention of continually chasing this. If you want to run the risk, then that is a matter for each investor.
We have issued a large number of claims already. We expect an up turn as people review their advice. Shortly, we will be opening up our remit to claims where an unauthorised adviser
Contact / Helpline
Please call us on 01384 889900 and speak to Phil Haslam or Martyn Anderson.
interesting comment from ‘Zoro’ posting on http://www.pimlico-flats.co.uk relating to SIPP companies and the £1 valuation.
quote “A word on that £1 valuation; the FCA told your SIPP company that unless they can show a proper (independent) valuation of the investment (which they can’t) they should not just take Harlequin’s word on the value of the property i.e. what they sold it for. The SIPP company decided to err on the side of caution and therefore chose a £1 figure to safeguard them in the event (likely in the FCA’s opinion) that the investment will turn out to be worthless. The FCA has singled out Harlequin for this treatment, make of that what you will!!! “unquote.
@BB
Now you have inadvertently, posted something that’s positive for Harlequin and investors!
This is why its going to be easy to sue an IFA.
What you may not like is that also means HP won’t have to give the money back – I don’t give two hoots as long as I get it back!!
I also don’t think many people will take the moral high-ground either.
Sue them!
Mr O’Halloran was ordered to pay back £1.3million yesterday by Mr Justice McGovern at the High Court in Dublin.
Wow! Glad that’s over. Now Harlequin can get on with building the Resorts in the Caribbean that investors paid £400 million for.
This court case clearly demonstrates that Mr Ames did not know (naive ) how to manage and control a project such as BB, far less 7 other projects at the same time in DR, St Lucia, Brazil, and Barbados.
The fact is no Construction Company will touch them now with a ten foot pole, and they are unable to do it themselves. So what is the future of the unfinished projects?
Stay tuned for more BS from the PR folks.
Who is paying costs in the Irish court case or has that not been awarded yet?
Great comments BFP, Ames has really showed what a complete an utter prat he really is.
Only a few dumbasses like Fdnrm would try and put some positive spin on this.
@Where has the £400 “million” gone ?????
That’s far to polite, he is a scheming, robbing, short arsed little CU*T
@Where has etc etc, no need, BBaywatch has done that. Dumbass? Nice. High interlect poster comes to the front again.
@Yatinkiteasy, have you seen how in the UK press trip advisor has been slated for posting spoof reports. It it has been proved that rivals are posting negative reports so destroy businesses. Now who would have thought that. Perhaps Irish builders/discredited accountants etc could have been posting negative reports in order to destroy a business. I would hope you would disown anyone who did that.
“Now you have inadvertently, posted something that’s positive for Harlequin and investors!” – you really think that? The Financial Conduct Authority have singled Harlequin out stating that SIPP’s providers should “take a prudent approach to valuations” and that “how each firm values the investment is up to them”. Quite clearly some firms are taking the approach that the Harlequin investment is worthless or of nominal value only. How any investor could take a single crumb of comfort from that is beyond me. I hold no brief for the financial services industry – far too much snake il for my liking but how anyone can spin this news as positive???
As I have said before, Harlequin is now synonymous with ‘failed overseas investment’.
FDNRM is a dark horse I’ve just found his audition for Harlequin on youtube
No planning, 95 per cent of what was sold has not even been started yet. Ames has the money in his pocket already. As do the ifa’s. 95 per cent of purchasers have nothing to show for their investment, not even planning permission. Years later. I’d say 1 pound is a high valuation for those units. There is no dressing this up. Ames is far wealthier than when this started. Do the math.
After the Irish court ruling does anyone know what the status is
of the B-707 and the race-track in St Lucia? There seem to be so
many lose ends not tied-up. Just wondering!
the 1.2 million court order should go a long way to bring aimless Ames & Co out of bankrupcy
@7135 no one is in “bankrupcy” DE DA DE DA Spelling police wanted. Where are you?
It may be open season for internet sleuths. I’ve just read an entry
on I-Witness-News that references politician/government activity in
St Vincent. I expect it won’t be long before politicians in Barbados will
be implicated in dealings with Ames et Cie. As the Bard said, “all the
world’s a stage….” he could now add ” and all secrets, transactions,
activities etc are floating around somewhere in the i-cloud”
This promises to become very interesting. Maybe there is something
positive to be said for Wikileaks after all.
Not a chance the Brotherhood runs too deep.
A special little meeting!!!!
Well, here is an interesting one for you…. Mr Ames is meeting the senior movers and shakers of TaylorMade in Warrington this Friday, a selected trusted few. 😉
Guess what, The lodge Alistair Burns belongs to meets…….. yep this Friday
in Cheshire…… coincidence….. I think not!
What a loads of b******s all this crap is, stick to facts not rumours
Punctuation old boy!
There is a certain irony about the fact Ames is meeting the IFA’s today and Reg Legal are going to be taking their pants down and giving them a good old rodgering!!!
I will drink to that the tw@ts deserve to lose the whole lot
Fatchett does not represent me
While you are make a run to get the spelling police can you swing around the corner and get the forensic auditors as well? We will need them to help us find the few hundred million dollars which are presently unaccounted for and missing.
Ames and Harlequin spent how many millions in legal fees to get this recent Judgement? Ames and O’Halloran laughing all the way to the bank or some low tax jurisdiction. A terrible thing we the cons are smarter than the conned and can even con the authorities.
There are some mighty unhappy TaylorMade sales agents, they actually seen through Ames bullshit.
They have nothing to sell and no chance of getting paid what they are owed – such a shame 😉
Ames struggled as usual when asked about throwing the IFA’s to the dogs to save his own skin…… We all know that’s coming.
Some very worried agents indeed – maybe there is a God after all……
H trolls blocking up the comments with loads of crap today.BFP please clean up.
@yatinkiteasy, are you including yourself in that? Any comment about the cricket team review on TA yet?
Ha, the Chief Troll is out again!(see above)
@Yatinkiteasy
Who the hell do you think you are? What a bloody ego, toss pot
It’s been quiet for a couple of days then then the self appointed censor cannot help himself and post an idiotic post. Who do you think you are, Yatiniteasy, to decide who is or is not a troll. Now if you want to contribute to this forum, what are your thoughts regarding the cricket team review on TA?
What does a ta review have to do with Ames squandering 400m? This surely is more important than an argument about how good bucc bay is or is not? Facts are facts, where are the developments, where are the planning permissions, where is the money??
@Anon 2.08 I think you are right. However our friend Yatinkiteasy likes to keep posting TA reviews, which is fine, except he only posts the negative bits. Even to the point of selectively posting tiny bits of the full review. I believe that if TA is being quoted then all the review, the good and the bad, should be posted if it is deemed to be relevant. Cannot be fairer than that.
Did the cricket team pay for their accommodation and food or were they guests of Harlequin?
A favourable review after some absolute shockers. And who is the chump in charge of responding to TA reviews? He/she is in dire need of some lessons in customer services.
Is the leccie still on at Buccament Bay?
@EL2 – Are you a writer at “The Economist”? What a beautiful
word -leccie- . That newspaper has a way of inserting seldom
used words in articles….at least at least seldom used
on my side of the pond.
@Eddie Lizzard2 ..my thoughts exactly…
Besides, is Harlequin`s future really dependent on the success of BB, which has seen at least 4 GMs in 3 years, and all executive chefs , resort managers gone? Electricity service cut off for non payment of bills, Dive Shop Indigo closed for 3 days in July, local Suppliers not delivering liquor or food supplies on credit?Reported very low occupancy by several TA reviewers.(Even the positive reviews)
Great TA review from the Pakistani guy…so what? Nothing has changed to say they will be around in the next 6 months.
Hang on, the Pakistani cricket team had a nice stay at BB? Well that changes EVERYTHING.
Christ, with circa £1.5m due from Padraig O’Halloran, a glowing review from the Pakistani cricket team on TA and the continued backing of Dave and Carole “Honey-monster” Ames, this £1bn development investment is looking better than ever.
Joking aside, how on earth is BB surviving financially, and how are Dave and Carole’s living expenses being paid? Any idea what the administrator’s fees currently stand at?
I wonder what the T/A revue would have read like if
HORRORS!!! an Indian had been on staff. Seems like
a great place to spend Ramadan. To each his own….
@ yatinkiteasy Nothing has changed to say they will be around in the next 6 months.
Sadly, their ‘5-star’ plastic cups and glasses will be around for a lot longer polluting the local environment.
@dwtswia. Naw , hate mosquitoes,and I’m not fasting.
,
@Yatinkiteasy, not been? Suggest you write a TA review, after all you an expert in all that is BB arn’t you.
@dwtswia
I have. Figured out it was a scam the second day I was there. A part built show resort that could no where near take the projected thousands of guests.
Which equals they are liars and selling units they could never deliver equals con men. The victim who I was there with applied for a refund the day after we got back.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2384519/Its-hotel-review-website-millions-use-help-choose-holiday-But–Can-trust-single-word-Trip-Advisor.html
Just as I thought. All these negative reviews posted by Yakinteasy could be posted by anti HP trolls.
Do you really need somebody to explain to you that it could equally mean that all the positive reviews were just as disingenuous?
Lest you forget, a number of reviews for BB were removed from TA for that exact reason.
Lol. “Anti HP troll” !!!!!!
I consider myself an honest man with integrity. I am anti HP, not because I am a troll, simply because I hate seeing people being ripped off by some thieving conman. I understand that some people are desperate about losing everything and clutching at straws, but seriously it is the equivalent of negotiating with the fellow that has just burgled your house. Desperate and deluded.
Amen Anon.
@Dug, no of course not. Suggest you dont loose your sense of humor. I’m pulling Yatinkiteasy’s chain because he has constantly posted on here anti HP posts on TA, rather than being balanced and posting good and bad. I guess you would have to ask yourself why he would do that? What is his agenda?
@Anon, 11.02, I’m not suggesting you are a troll, I am suggesting all the anti HP postings COULD have been posted by anti HP trolls. Have you been to BB? Have you posted on TA? If so when was your TA review put up?
The way I see it, whether reviews are positive or negative is completely academic. They are all reviews of a resort that is hemorrhaging money and can’t stand on it’s own 2 feet. Unless there is any evidence that proves otherwise?
Just out of interest, does anyone know how Crozier’s movement is going? Has she had any success yet?
“whether reviews are positive or negative is completely academic.” – not quite, the undisputed fact that over 150+ reviews were removed says something about the attitude of HP and their willingness to be economical with the actualité, as Alan Clark memorably put it. Coupled with Mr Ames on camera performances re the (non existent) marina and his DVD promotional material released at World Travel Market suggesting that reviews would be a big part of the marketing, it gives quite an insight into the mindset of HP and Ames. More recently the blame game re the electricity blackout, Indigo Dive and now the IFA’s etc should give any investor pause for thought. How can you do business (rescue plan?) with a man who will lie to camera about about a marina being almost complete when it had never been started?
I expect much more of this to come – I still have my comfy seat and popcorn to hand while watching this unfold.
A few Pakistani cricket teams players got banned for corruption so i know their review don’t really mean f*ckall but I’m clutching at at straws here!
Dave Ames takes it up the back door so I’m going to defend him forever.
I will defend him until i die because we are secret lovers.
Now the truth is out ill also let you know, That old slag Carol is really a man!
fdnrm-
Ease up on the boxed wine. The spelling police will be out in force.
Sorry to read about your really sad domestic situation…
@Anon 7.29 I appreciate your sentiments. I will pass them on to my alto ego.
I think your ego is about as “alto” as it can get
@Sid, they are miles of getting anything….. apart from £6000 they have coughed up so far.
She is full of shit and not ever a proper solicitor…. fool and the money an all that 🙂
It’s been quiet for a couple of days, Simon Terry is away on his holidays now, so not much to report…….. Ames knows he is running out of time Shipleys won’t wait for ever….. nor with the SFO………
All boring not much happening, even WTF is not around – I did hear Dave is avoiding him …. but he won’t go away!!!!!!!!
I very much doubt nothing is happening. Unless you have written off your investment in its entirety, the stupidest thing to do is sit and wait and do nothing. Am sure not all investors are stupid, there will be activity and there is no reason to tell people if you are taking action. Best just get on and do it.
Hi Leaky Squeaky. What’s the mood like in the Bunker? Have you seen the movie Downfall? Is Ames going the way of Adolf, deluded and losing the plot?
It’s incredibly quiet on here. Has everyone given up?
Does anyone have any news?
http://www.international-adviser.com/news/products/harlequin-wins-high-court-battle-over-contractor
There is some news.
I am not going on holiday…….;)
Expands even more how complicit Newman and MacDonald were in the fraud. Role on the 2nd court case the end of the year.
@Llmintb. Why not, I’m sure you won’t be missed. Thought you might have commented on the latest letter to come out.
So how much has Ames been awarded so far and how much is he still pursuing?
So how much has Ames been awarded so far and how much is he still pursuing?
…and how much will he still owe?
You never know, once the SIPP investors are refunded by the IFA’s and they walk away, that may reduce the number of remaining investors to a realistic amount that can be accommodated by the existing resorts. If Ames then sells off the land for the resorts that are never going to happen and starts taking completion money for BB and manages to get external finance, maybe a scaled down HP could work?
What do you think FDNRM?
However if the IFA insurers in turn file claim against HD the
equation does not change. And I think when dealing with
Insurance Company lawyers you are dealing with the big boys
ie. – they guys who NEVER quit.
I don’t think Fatchett would be putting so much into it if he wasn’t confident of a result, would he?
@Sid, I think your analysis is very good. However you are missing one point, new investment.
Hi FDNRM, I think I covered that under ‘external finance’ i.e. investment from new finance organisations.
So do you think it will work out ok?
fdnrm new investment…you got more chance of seeing Lord Lucan ride Shergar to victory in the Lunar Derby on the moon
@Sid, I do but that’s just my opinion and I’m sure the usual trolls will pitch in now.
@irigo. Wrong, it’s Elvis who is on the moon.
Here’s hoping eh.
I do find it very odd that this forum is suddenly so quiet. It’s almost as though the order to cause disruption has been lifted. Or am I just being cynical?
@Sid, probably the usual posters of anything negative about HP have run out of material. Even Dumb and Dumber have disappeared. It probably shows the usual suspects such as Erica realise that their attempts to bring HP down through the media has failed. Don’t get me wrong there is still a long way to go but it’s back on the up. Did you receive the latest HP letter about completions?
I did yes and am pleasantly surprised that people are completing. I only hope the news is true and not more fiction, and hope that Fatchett is driving the completions. All in all, the fact that things are moving forward can only be good for everyone as things could be a lot worse, though it doesn’t change the fact that things should never of been so bad in the first place.
Who would be mad enough to want to complete when in the absence of accounts for any of the Caribbean companies they can have no idea about the financial position.
Surely to complete, you would want title to the land….and what if , just what if BB did/does close as it isnt paying …what do purchasers end up with…ok a cabana, but not gonna produce the income desire.
Way to many unanswered questions for a happy ending, not least how did it get to this point in the first place
Ponzi. Like the others, taking years to crash, but it will be revealed as a ponzi, even though it obviously is already to most impartial observers. What do the 6000 people who have nothing to complete on have to show for their investment 6 years ago??
Lord Lucan riding Shergar to victory on the moon had me snorting my morning coffee through my nostrils. The point is well made though.
Which third party financier is going to hand over money to a company that had to demonstrate its utter incompetence as a developer in order to win a court case? Surely you would think twice about handing over Monopoly money to someone who has demonstrably shown they can’t put appropriate safeguards in place to ensure it is properly spent.
@Anon, I have the answer to that….it’s nothing.
@Anon 3.06 it’s not 6000 people, it’s 6000 investments.
Here come the old pedant to bitch about numbers again. Out of 6000 ‘investments’ only 300 units were built. A lot of ‘investors’ still out of pocket.
I’m hoping that soon a good percentage of those investors will be refunded through the SIPP route, which will bring things down to a manageable number.
Dave Ames is suing the SFO for damaging his business………
@Sid,
It makes sense for the PI,or via the ombudsman scheme ( if the IFA company has gone bust or PI exceeded) but its capped at 5ok, however I guess that would cover most peoples SIPP investment?
Dave Ames suing the SFO, that I would love to see!! Who is paying his fees! you must admit his has a bloody pair of balls!!!
@EL2 what’s it got to do with you. Are you against accuracy in statements? Very odd.
Seems that some investors are still expecting the cavalry to come over the hill and bail them out. That they haven’t learnt anything from events to date is surprising, more surprising that they still don’t seem to be seeking and getting quality advice on their position and options.
I think that the issue is that you’re very discretionary in your pedantry, FDNRM. You will flagrantly ignore some enormous details, and direct questions, and then become obsessed with others that in the grand scheme of things may reasonably be considered fairly irrelevant.
Suing the SFO — and before they’ve even announced their findings? Unbelievable.
@BBayatch, I’m sure there aren’t that many people who haven’t yet taken legal advise. All the investors I know of are going down one route or another. I don’ personally know of any who are just hoping for the best.
@Sid, BBaywatch hasn’t got a clue. There is very little to cut and paste from journals at the moment so why not just post something regurgitated and make something up “more surprising that they still don’t seem to be seeking and getting quality advice on their position and options.” How do you know that? You don’t just something made up.
@Dug, Is accuracy not important? I would thought it was. And by the way I hope your last comment was not aimed at me.
But, if the SFO have caused a problem its fair enough? However, to take them on is not the best idea – after having a minor victory he could be punch drunk 😉
Imagine how much that will cost!!!!!!!
If Ames wants to resurrect his reputation he needs to be publicly seen to be doing the right thing by people, not letting people down, hiding behind excuses and blaming everyone else. It’s time to start refunding people that have been over due a refund for 5 years plus and offering completions to those that want to complete. Until people see this kind of behaviour they will continue to think the worse.
@Sid, the last letter from HP suggested 50 people are ready to complete.
Like I said yesterday, I hope that’s true.
I’d be curious to know who these people completing are — the FCA has specifically warned against doing this very thing haven’t they? How is it possible to complete when there are so many outstanding questions? Not just the big questions, but those pertaining to completions — taxes, accounts, definition of net in respect of receipts etc. Sid, you are absolutely right that if there is any hope everything must be done with transparency — I can’t see any meaningful signs of this yet.
Blaming the SFO is just playing the same game as usual. The fact is they’re still looking. If they thought there was nothing to find, surely they’d have wound this up ages ago. Taking on a dodgy builder and taking on the SFO are very, very different things.
FDNRM you might petulantly spout off about importance of accuracy — to which I would say return to the issue of the accounts: No accounts for 7 years in the Caribbean, heavily qualified accounts in the UK (delivered late). I’m surprised that your penchant for accuracy doesn’t lead you more in this direction — it is, after all, a much bigger issue. 6000 investors or 6000 people is semantics. It’s more than a thousand either way. It’s a lot, that’s the salient point (as I suspect you probably know). You identify the discrepancy with a view to try and loosen the point or the argument — it doesn’t, it makes you look utterly blinded.
@Dug, I like your take on the situation. Can I ask if you have invested in HP yourself?
Ames v The SFO? Never going to happen…
Completions at BB? No accounts, no land titles, no transparency, no confidence… Same!
I chose my words with care – it’s the quality of the advice that I was questioning. Many of the investor posters appear to somewhat naive about the further implications of certain actions (eg action against a SIPP provider) and the consequences and chain of events that would be set in motion. As Dug has pointed out, the FCA warnings appear to be being ignored, and that alone raises serious questions as to the quality of the advice.
@Dug, I’m surprised that accuracy of information is not important. Obviously you have different standards.
Regarding the SFO, two property developers recently sued the SFO and won, so it is not out of the question. However I could have posted that as One property developer sued a UFO and his son, which would have been accurate enough for Dug.
There are lots of varying opinions flying around, but as they say the proof of the pudding etc. Ames has got a chance now to undo some of the mess he has made and time will tell if he is telling the truth. It’s a good thing that we are finally at the stage where real action is being taken, though I do wonder what he would have done had Fatchett not come along.
@Sid, I think that Fatchett coming along probably focused the minds somewhat. However where I think he made a mistake was putting the SDs on. I can understand why he did it but it has hampered fund raising. The fact he has backed of and is now chasing the IFA/SIPP providers has been good. If anyone thinks that going after HP was a good idea just look where Crozier is at the mo. Anyone seen or heard from her recently? With Sheargar and Lord Lucon perhaps?
Oh dear, FDNRM, you do make yourself look a bit thick when you make comments like that. Your example materially changes the content of the sentence, and thus the suggestion contained therein; that is in no way comparable to any possible confusion that could arise in the difference between 6000 investors and 6000 people — which is in context, essentially semantics. I’m never quite sure if you’re wilfully clutching the wrong end of the stick, are being deliberately obtuse or are just a bit dense — I would suspect a combination of the three. In any event, any rational individual would understand that the value of accuracy is relative — and that inaccuracies that do not materially affect, or impact, the headline information are not something to get unduly concerned about. There are much, much bigger issues with accuracy here that you chose to turn a blind eye to. I notice that you ignored mention of the accounts. Interesting.
I’m very comfortable that my standards are not your standards — and I’m very happy about that.
Sid, I’m not an investor personally — though nearly was. I’ve kept a close eye on the company ever since — as much as anything else to see if they could actually do what they said they would (there were some very impressive claims). My spidey senses are always piqued whenever there is a suggestion made that an investment is low, or no, risk — particularly where international property is concerned. It seemed that this one was always going to be some people to take unusual risks.
On a related note, I always find any attempt to silence debate very problematic. It strikes me that all information should be made available — there’s always seemed to be a particular double standard here.
Thank you or replying to my question Dug. It was asked out of nothing more than personal curiosity.
@FDNRM, are you assuming that Crozier hasn’t got far with her case? I think it would be naive to think that her case has collapsed just because she has gone quiet. I would take that to mean that she may be in negotiation with HP and knows the importance of keeping things confidential. Loose lips and all that. But that’s just my opinion and I actually know nothing factual. Do you?
@Dug, yes and the best way to try and silence debate is to personally attack someone. Ring any bells, or just look at what you have just posted. I cannot comment about accounts, I know nothing about the. I never comment on things I know nothing about so stop asking silly questions. And you are not an investor? Well well no surprise there then. So really all this has absolutely nothing to do with you. Just want to keep a close eye on things? Well stop the pontificating, go away and let the people with an vested interest discuss the real issues. I think we have a new group now, Dumb, Dumber and even Dumber!
@Sid, no I don’t think she has gone away, but she has not achieved anything for the money her 13 clients coughed up. I think it will be a long time before she does also.
You may well be right. I don’t think there is a court date set for any time soon and I’m sure Ames will do everything in his power to delay it for as long as possible.
Why should people not go after harlequin? They have a contract with them, and they have not delivered, in fact have spectacularly delivered nothing 95 per cent of buyers. Their chairman has been recorded openly lying. These people have breached their contracts, not an ifa or sip provider, and harlequin owe the refunds. How can people possibly ignore going after harlequin if they invested cash? Bizarre comments from some trying to steer the focus of the wrongdoing away from harlequin.
@Anon, I don’t think anyone has suggested not “going after HP” I suggested that SDs were not the best way that was all. No one is trying to “steer” anything. Its my opinion, if you don’t like it then don’t read the post.
Interesting statements…….
Fatchett does not represent me.
August 8, 2013 at 1:55 pm
@Sid, the last letter from HP suggested 50 people are ready to complete.
From:Harlequin Newsletter September 2012.
“In the early days of selling property in the Caribbean, some people said that this
was all too good to be true and that it wouldn’t happen. I feel that we have proved
them wrong as we are now in the process of handing over legal title to the
properties at Buccament Bay Resort, which is a significant step and completes the
cycle that we promised all those years ago.
We look forward to a great future for all our investors and I thank you for your
continued support.
Kind regards
Dave Ames
CHAIRMAN, HARLEQUIN HOTELS & RESORTS”
“Fool me once”…and all that.
@Yatinkiteasy, do you enjoy butting in to a conversation between me and Sid? Another non investor who cannot help themselves but need their daily fix of commenting on something that does not concern them. Which one do you want to be Dumb or Dumber?
Keep it up Yatink They live in some sort of parallel reality. The true
dumb-dumbs would be the 50 closers on a property with 5,950 liens.
And a thank you to BFP for providing fdnrm/Sid a forum to hold a
private conversation. Yecccccch !!!
Leaky Squeaky Arse in the Bunker – why is it that you have to keep bringing my name into your bullshit postings.
I don’t post on here because its too boring and full of misinformation!
As for Dave avoiding me where did he go after last weeks Tailormade meeting?
Can you manage to explain to me yet why if you think HArlequin is a scam why you work there and why it’s morally acceptable to take a salary which in turn can only be investors money? How can you so that and criticise FDNRM for accepting a return on his investment?
@anon 7.47pm …FDNRM likes to tell people that they should not be on this blog because they are not (dumb) investors..Now he wants to carry on a personal conversation with Sid, on Barbados Free Press. And don`t ask him if he has his legal title to his cabana yet…that really sets him off.
I`ll bet that the 50 investors they say are about to close is about as real as the Harlequin Resorts in the Dominican Republic, St Lucia, and Merricks Barbados.Or as real as the H airline, or the fantastic Marina at Buccament Bay.
FDNRM is not just DUMB, he is totally delusional to believe whatever H people tell or promise him .
@Yatinkiteasy/Anon 7.47. Let me explain how blogs work for you. When using the @ symbol as in @Sid it means my answer is directed at Sid. Now if i used @Sid/anyone else who who wants to butt in then I would use that. See it really is simple, but not simple enough for you two to understand.
@Yatinkiteasy (see this is directed at you) I have not said anywhere that people should not be on this blog. I have queried why anyone would want to be on it if they are not investors or just want to “see” what is going on i.e. Dug. And no it does not “set me off” if someone asks about legal title, you know, I know that no one has legal title yet so the question is just stupid. So do you want to be Dumb or Dumber. Come on answer the question. You know you want to, or is too difficult for you?
FDNRM has got to be the most stupid person on the Internet . Dumbest would definitely describe him.
At least The Chief Troll has confirmed that he knows that no one has received title to BB units. This also confirms that the statement from DA in the H Newsletter of Sept 2012 that they were then in the process of delivering titles was a blatant lie. Thanks for the confirmation FDNRM.
It is not news that Ames lies. He is a liar and a crook. People who invest time or money in him now are simply dumb.
Interesting tv program in UK last night….”fraud squad”…they tracked down people selling carbon credits and money laundering about 27million…got eight years in jail….now I wonder what the sentence would be for 400 million.
I hear toilet roll sales in Baslidon are seeing a dramtic increase.
Matthew Ames (Dave and Carol’s eldest son) appeared at the Old Bailey in February 2013 and pleaded not guilty to two counts of fraudulent trading. This relates to his now defunct companies The Investor Club and Forestry for Life.
The Investor Club allegedly raised £846,494 for investments in teak tree plantations in Sri Lanka, while Forestry for Life allegedly raised £443,327 from investors for avoided deforestation projects in Brazil and elsewhere.
Matt Ames will appear in court again in September 2013 – at Southwark I was told. I wonder if Carter Ruck (owed more than £20k in the Harlequin Management Services (South East) collapse) will continue to represent him? If not, bearing in mind that the Ames family’s coffers are currently a little depleted, I wonder if he applied for Legal Aid.
http://www.redd-monitor.org/2013/05/22/matthew-ames-director-of-carbon-credits-company-forestry-for-life-charged-with-1-2-million-fraud/
Now, now FDNRM it’s a bit silly to try and describe people as dumb just because they don’t subscribe to your argument — and let’s be honest, lots of people don’t. It’s also utterly disingenuous to suggest that I was attempting to silence you; I quite clearly wasn’t — but if you say something that’s a bit errant, you should expect to be pulled up on it. That’s sort of how these things work. I notice however, that with a hypocrisy that isn’t without precedent, you are attempting to silence me by telling me to “go away” — and also not commenting on things you claim to know nothing about, whilst simultaneously commenting on things that you clearly know nothing about either.
Regardless, I’m not going anywhere. It’s not only investors who have an interest here. I may not personally be an investor, but I have been approached by friends and colleagues asking for informal advice on my thoughts on it. It’s through resources like this one that I’ve been able to suggest information that provides a fuller picture, and issues they might like to properly consider — which includes both the pros and the cons. Surely any reasonable person would advocate such investors being able to do as much DD as possible?
@Dug, how pompous to suggest I have said something ” a bit errant” and I should be “pulled up” up on it. How arrogant are you! So you think that reading a blog, and making uninformed comments makes you an point of informed information regarding HP? When you have over 100 pages of transcripts from an interview with the SFO you just might have a better understanding of what HP is all about. “and also not commenting on things you claim to know nothing about, whilst simultaneously commenting on things that you clearly know nothing about either.” And you have clearly lost me on that one. Prey tell me, what “things” am I commenting on that I clearly know nothing about?
@Yatinkiteasy (yes this is directed at you) A post at 11.13 followed by another one at 11.19 Is it too difficult for you to combine the two together? Too complicated a thought process? And this is from the person who complained about the thread being blocked up! Couldn’t make it up!
GOOD NEWS: BB is going to make a go of it…
BAD NEWS: Being forced to sit next to FDNRM on a
long, long, long, BA flight in a crowed main cabin
trans-Atlantic.
Now the Chief Troll is not only saying Who should post comments, and when they should or shouldn’t , but is now giving instructions as to how the comments should be delivered .”combine the two together” ….confirmed Dumbest!
@Doug… You will never get the last word with the Chief Troll. His mission is to throw crap around and insult people so as to detract attention from the subject of any discussion on Harlequin.
@Anon 11.05 not a clue what you are on about.
@Yatinkiteasy, discuss as much as you like. But don’t be a hypocrite and tell posters not to block up the thread, and then do precisely that. You are not even able to think up your own comments, using my Dumb and Dumber comparison. Common man show some imagination. lol
Amaryllis Hotel in Barbados is up for sale, according to a story in Barbados Today 8th Aug 2013.
Back in Feb Hardlysuccess called me a liar when I said that the sale to Harlequin ( for their second H hotel) had fallen through.
Time will tell what will happen with BB, but I predict its going to be very painful for a lot of investors, especially cash investors or folks who are now thinking of completing by handing over even more money to a company that has never filed financial statements.
How much bile did FDNRM put on her cornflakes this morning?
Blah blah blah
@Anonymous
August 9, 2013 at 11:05 am
The only good news about Harlequin is that since Mr Ames defenestrated the assets of investors like 36 you are much less likely to have to share any kind of space with them anywhere in the Caribbean – we must be thankful for small mercies 😉
ps – bet he votes UKIP, typical bar bore.
Talk of completions……. 50 wow! Does anyone have a idea how many units are actually available on BB!!!!!!!!
After you take out all the units being used as offices, staff accommodation, restaurants, kids clubs ect etc 😉
Maybe WTF can update us after he met up ( in his mind) with Dave Ames.
He is a Walter Mitty on speed. bit like Ames
@EL2
Have Matt Ames in charge of BB make me feels all warm and fuzzy inside, such a glowing CV just like daddy!!
Only a dickbrain like Ames would think this is a good idea
I bet Matt votes UKIP too!
@ FDNRM
How can you defend some conman running a resort that you have given cash to?
Dan Ames is as guilty as his Daddy, just not as vertically chalanged
ARI – Get him horizontal and he might surprise you !
There will be no deal.
Ask RL how many statutory demands have been removed.
They all need to be removed for new finance or completions to occur.
I suspect the completers will be advised to hold fire. Therefore, no money is likely in the next 3 months.
@ truthI think the truth is…no more money will be coming ever. Any money invested would provide longer enjoyment if it was burned on a bonfire
Sue the IFA’s is the only real option, the rest is just smoke and mirrors / delay tactics and bullshit
There is no finance, and all the regulatory bodies will have to OK any deal the investors need input…… without them its a no go.
Its game over for the evil Ames family……
Sorry when they sue the SFO and accountants they will build resorts 😉
ARI – I have read and re-read you last sentence…”Sorry when
they sue the SFO and accountants they will build resorts”. I
give up. What do you mean?
Ames is suing the SFO and then the accountants, I was being sarcastic 😉
but only about the building, he is actually going after the SFO – silly man
Has anyone an idea what the running costs of Buccament Bay would be? Is it true it was losing $1million a month?
The highly paid GM, exec Chef , and several others left, so they would save a few dollars there. Also with low occupancy , their AC costs should be quite a bit lower as well. Same as to Food and Beverage purchases. There is no more construction going on, so no expenses there.
I guess it depends on how much Matt is paying himself as GM.
One of the managers (can’t remember which one – they change them like underpants) said that it was being subsidised to the tune of $1m per month, which is not quite the same thing. Bearing in mind that many hotels are subsidised at some stage (see the thread on here re Adrian Loveridge’s posts and response) – is Sandy Lane really being paid that amount by the BTA? – sorry, back to the point, subsidy in early stages may not necessarily be a bad thing if the hotel is actually attracting guests and building to near capacity occupation, but as BB seems to only have a handful most of the time then if there is a long term subsidy required that would not be good at all. Of course if there were any accounts to see we would know exactly what the position was – but that’s not likely to happen.
The Vitriolic nature of the press releases and statements by Harlequin and the Ames family in respect of the recent Judgement in the Irish High Court is very odd indeed.
Harlequin released four paragraphs of the Irish Judgement and three pages of additional notes including references to the court transcripts (but interestingly not the transcripts themselves as had been previously promised by Mr.Ames) to a large number of media organisations last week.
The releases concentrated in the most part on the alleged involvement of Wilkins Kennedy and two of its senior employees / partners in the fraudulent misrepresentations and deceit.
Wilkins Kennedy is a top 25 firm of accountants in existence for over 100 years.
Mr. Ames failed however to include in his releases the involvement of RLB in the case. RLB is one of the largest Quantity Surveying and Project management firms in the world and had been engaged by Harlequin to report on construction progress at the Buccament Bay site.
Mr. Garreth Ronan who up to a few weeks ago was the VP of Hotel Development for Harlequin Hotels and Resorts and who now works for the Japanese restaurant chain Zuma in New York told the court of his concerns as to the accuracy of the RLB reports and further stated that RLB had possibly tempered the reports.
The Hon. Judge must have found this evidence so compelling that he felt it necessary to include it in his judgement.
Furthermore Mr. David Campion the former development director of the Harlequin Design Studio up to the time it closed earlier this year and who now operates Argo architects in Barbados was also critical of RLB. Mr. Campion is part of Mr. Fatchets team in Mr. Fatchets rescue plans for Harlequin. Mr. Campion travelled to the UK in mid July to meet with Mr. Fatchet and others to discuss the development options.
Yet despite the negative comments about RLB in the Hon. Judges judgement. Mr. Ames has failed to state what action he intends to take against RLB. The allegations made by Harlequin against RLB in the case were serious in the extreme. So serious that the judge felt compelled to include them in his judgement.
On that basis and given the judgement and as a sign of good faith to his purchasers Mr. Ames should consider a professional negligence claim against RLB at the very least.
Mr. Ames has stated to purchasers that he intends suing the SFO yet makes no mention of his intentions as they pertain to RLB.
It is however very odd and possibly very telling that Mr. Ames has to date made no reference to RLB despite his and his wife’s very public statement that they will continue to seek justice.
The Hon. Judge also makes reference to the alleged misappropriation by the previous contractor on the Buccament Bay project. Yet despite over five years having elapsed Mr. Ames has taken no action on that matter. So why after such a long time was the issue raised in the Irish Court and why has no action been taken by Mr. Ames?.
Mr. Ames in his press releases to the media states that the firm of Grant Thornton provided him with expert witness testimony in support of his actions in the case. The judge also refers to Grant Thornton. Yet Grant Thornton have been looking into the activities of Harlequin in the UK and have attended a number of purchaser meetings.
The Hon. Judge also states that little or no work was completed on the Buccament Bay project. Did Mr. Ames not visit the Buccament Bay project during the tenure of Mr. O Halloran’s companies. If not why not?
The judge ruled that Mr. O Halloran engaged in fraudulent misrepresentation and deceit. Ironic when you consider that during the period in question Mr. Ames was publically stating and producing promotional material indicating that work was progressing a pace. One such video in early 2010 shows Mr. Ames discussing the great progress of the Marina.
The Hon. Judge makes an implication that Mr. Ames may have been somewhat naieve.
Mr. Ames’s own website states that Mr. Ames has run a number of successful businesses over the past 30 years.
In a recent newspaper article it was stated that Mr. Ames sold his successful construction business to Coulthards a number of years ago.
So is Mr. Ames naieve?.
With respect to the SFO investigation, it appears that the investigation is still ongoing. One would expect at the very least that the reference to Harlequin would be removed from the SFO website if the SFO were not continuing with their investigations.
Mr. Ames had repeated his allegations on numerous occasions that the sole purpose for individuals reporting him and his companies to the SFO was to influence the judgement not only in the Irish case but in other actions Mr. Ames and Harlequin are currently taking. Mr. Ames has claimed that the information being provided to the SFO is both false and defamatory.
Has Mr. Ames reported these individuals for wasting police time or the equivalent as it pertains to the SFO.
The judge awarded 1.55 million Euros in damages to Harlequin. This amounts to just 0.3 % (one third of a percentage point) of monies taken in deposits by Harlequin. The total monies Harlequin claim that have been allegedly misappropriated by Mr. O Halloran is 1.85 % of deposits received by Harlequin. Yet Mr. Ames in a letter to purchasers stated that progress on the Harlequin developments had virtually stalled as a result of the actions of Mr. O Halloran.
In a bizarre twist after Mr. O’ Halloran’s companies were removed from the Buccament Bay project a further fraud was committed against Mr. Ames by his own staff in excess of 4 million USD. Details of this fraud will be provided to media organisations with an interest in Harlequin in due course.
The full judgement is available on the Irish Courts Website.
If I could add another couple of points to the above.
The QS who signed off my build was from TVS, are they connected to RLB?
The original complaint sent to the SFO was by Newman, so I expect this to come up in the possible Newman court case.
There is no firm of Quantity Surveyor’s by the name of TVS operating in the Caribbean. There is an Architectural firm based out of The US called TVS and they have worked in the Caribbean. If your valuation was done between 2008 and June 2010 then check with RLB or Wilkins Kennedy. Mr. Ames has claimed (bizarrely) that Wilkins Kennedy acted as a QS firm. But as the judge has noted Wilkins Kennedy did not make an appearance in Ireland so Mr. Ames’s rather bizarre statement cannot be tested. The Judgement refers to a Mr. Amin from a firm of QS’s Mr. Ames used after June 2010. They were called BCQS.
I suspect the document you have is a forgery, sorry but in all likely hood it is. I believe the media will be running a story on forgery soon.
I have no idea who contacted the SFO first. I do know it was in or around 2009. I met the barrister dealing with it then. He was representing a number of clients. If Mr.Newman was a client of his then he may have been the first. Who knows.
I wonder can you tell me what happened the planned orangery at Buccament Bay. The project was planned in 2009. But never heard anything since.
We have been looking into the activities of the Ames family for a good number of years now for a number of clients. Its how we inadvertently stumbled on the fraud in the fall of 2010. We have made a report to the authorities and we did that some time back. In or about early to mid 2010 I think. I will have to check.
Just to be clear, the clients we assisted had issues with Panama, Thailand and Australia. And a report on this was sent some time early 2010.
Hi Ralf, sorry it was a misprint. It was TVA Consultants who were formally called Tomlinson Voss Associats ltd. They are a bona fidi company.
Also it was the SFO who confirmed the Newman connection.
Sorry Bob having worked in the business for the past 20 years the SFO nor any other state investigative agency will not inform the other side as to whom reported what first.
Not at this juncture in the investigation.
What the likes of the SFO etc are obliged to do is to pass evidence to the other parties defence team. Its akin to the discovery process in a civil case.
If the SFO have done this with Mr. Newman’s evidence then sadly for all concerned they must be very close to making their move.
Apologies FDNRM I inadvertently called you Bob. The bloody cat is in the room and the kids call him Bob. As in Bob no hope. Lol
What you have is a document signed off by Ridge view construction. TVA were the original architects and not the QS’S. As previously stated the first QS firm was either Wilkins Kennedy as bizarrely stated by Mr. Ames or RLB.
Much of the documentation pertaining to the Buccament Bay project was forged. Now the issue is who forged or tempered documents? Harlequin will claim it was RLB for example as they have done in the Irish case. Mr. O Halloran will claim that Harlequin produced documents which ultimately proved to be forged. Etc etc etc. What all parties agree on is someone was engaged in forging documents, and of that there is no doubt. The question now is who?
FDNRM. I have a question for you? Did you purchase an apartment or a villa? And did the document provided to you by TVA state your unit was complete?
Because this is where the wheels fall off the cart so to speak. The whole thrust of Harlequin’s claim in Ireland was that no units were completed until August 2010. At least that was what was claimed in the court. And only then 38 were completed. Since that date Harlequin claim to have completed another 62.
So if you have a document from TVA stating other wise then that document on Harlequin’s own evidence is false. TVA were not involved with the project from at the latest May 2008. And Harlequin’s own evidence to the Irish courts was that NO properties were completed up until August 2010. I am not saying that this is correct. I am saying that this is the claim made by Harlequin.
Let me give you an example of a hypothetical scenario.
A guy is working in a good job, he sees an advert for a villa in paradise. The returns are excellent. All the guy has to do is pay a 30% deposit say 12,000 and then stage payments as the unit is being built. He receives what he believes to be certificates from the architect via Harlequin in the UK.
Now if the architect had checked the building and certified it as being complete and signed off on it. What the architect would in essence have been saying was that the building to the stage he was signing it off to was built and that section completed to a standard, in this case a standard befitting a 5 star resort. That in essence, the building or the part signed off was completed properly, to an acceptable standard. The person paying the money would have continued to pay as per this hypothetical scenario a further 28,000.00. Thinking his unit was complete. Remember the thrust of the Irish case was that none of the units were completed before August 2010. And those that were virtually completed required a huge amount of remedial work to get them to a satisfactory condition. And a huge amount of additional money to get them completed.
Harlequin had promised the purchaser a 10% return per year on the completed unit. In this case 4000 per year in quarterly installments of 1000 per year. Even though Harlequin claim in legal actions the units are not complete they make the payments of 4000 a year because they are miniscule and they can always state later that they were indeed paying some of the guranteed payments. And no one would be any the wiser.
Of course this example above is ridiculous because there is no way that Harlequin would have sold anyone a unit for 40,000 and after comission leaving 34,000 to build a unit under half the cost to build one. This would have meant that Harlequin were trading insolvently from a very early stage. Oh this too is dealt with in the Irish Judgement.
The Irish judgement deals with the very issue of construction costs.
And of course had the architect signed off the units in the proper fashion the units would not need remedial work done to them.
If there was an architect and they did not sign off the work properly one would have thought that Mr. Ames would have sued them for professional negligence.
The question is who did sign off the certificates. I wonder?
Oh yeah in my hypothetical story the guy looses his job and is now on state benefits. So the last thing he wants or needs is to loose his investment. So he becomes an avid supporter of the developer.
I believe that both RLB and TVA acted as QS on Buccament Bay, in different capacities.
There are two TVAs. Historically, they were in the same ownership but they are now separated. One is an architectural practice based in Barbados, the other is a architectural / QS practice based in Grenada. It was the Grenada company that would have signed off anything on Buccament as the Barbados company has no QS capacity.
@ Ralph
Please post the link for the Irish court judgement.
Got it:
http://www.courts.ie/Judgments.nsf/23fd4a34bad801d980256ec50047a0a8/f0743232e643040080257bc0003d875b?OpenDocument&Highlight=0,harlequin
Thats the problem TVA only provided an Architectural role in Buccament Bay and not a QS role. However this we can verify with both companies tomorrow. You will note from the judgement at para 71 the allegations being made against RLB.
FDNRM is a genuine purchaser in Harlequin. His current circumstances mean he is dependant on his investment as a major part of his income. FDNRM is not alone in his plight. He along with many others is clinging on to a belief that Mr. Ames or Mr. Fatchet will perform some kind of miracle. The truth of the matter is very different. We will be providing a number of documents to the main stream media in the UK which will clearly ask some very probing questions of Harlequin. The documents themselves may prove to be the death knell of Harlequin as the documents were generated by Harlequin.
Lets hope that Harlequin will be in a position to answer the questions in a professional manner.
When will all this be happening, Ralph?
@Ralph, I hope you do and then you can stop hiding behind the ID of “Ralph” When that happens you and I will be having some very strong words. And you know why.
Is it because Ralph explains why Ames owns you FDNRM? It seems you really are desperately gullible.
Only had time for a very quick check, (using the document search facility) but on the face of it the phrases shown as quotes in this – http://www.international-adviser.com/news/products/harlequin-wins-high-court-battle-over-contractor – do not appear to have originated from the court report. I don’t have time to right now to investigate further but perhaps someone else might care to take a look to confirm that?
As no source was given in the International Adviser feature one wonders where it originated from.
one quick correction – the phrase –
The first named defendant (O’Halloran) and his senior advisors (Newman and MacDonald) travelled to the UK, Jordan, Romania and Morocco canvassing new business. It appears a ticket was bought for MacDonald, but that he had not ultimately travelled with other members of the party.
appears in para 67 of the court report as quote “Around this time, also, the first named defendant and his senior advisors travelled to the UK, Jordan, Romania and Morocco canvassing for new business. It appears that a ticket had been purchased for Mr. MacDonald, but that he had ultimately not travelled with the other members of the party.” unquote
NB neither Newman nor MacDonald are named. The addition of the names in the IA report may be confusing the court report search engine – no time to investigate further at the moment.
@Anon RU, No you are so wrong. “Ralph” obviously knows who I am, his innuendos are too close to the mark. However they are inaccurate and wrong in some of their assumptions. Before throwing your smart arsed comments out make sure your facts are accurate, which they are not!
Do I get the feeling that there is a smear campaign emerging against Newman and MacDonald? Lots of misquotes, biased Press Releases and the assertion that Newman was ‘found guilty’ when in fact it was a civil matter and he was not even a defendant in the Irish builder case. I wonder if it emanates from Harlequin? Of course it might have nothing to do with the upcoming court action by Harlequin against Newman and Wilkins Kennedy.
@EL2 Why do you think there is a smear campaign Take the time to read the court transcripts, they are damming in themselves. I’m surprised the three of them are not under the investigation by the SFO. This was serious fraud,and no less. And where do you get the idea its a “biased” press release? .
FDNRM this is in no way a personal attack on you or your character. Again as stated you are a genuine purchaser who has paid for your unit in full. And we believe that you are not alone in this. Most of the initial purchasers would have paid stage payments as you did. It must be remembered that the 30% down with nothing else to pay regime came at a later stage. Mr. Ames has publically stated on many occasions that he will soon be in a position to allow completions on units. Thus giving the impression that 70% funds will flow as a result. But as in your case FDNRM you have already paid most if not all the full amount. And we suspect you are not alone in this.
In addition FDNRM if you look closely at your contract, the original contract it clearly states that title would pass to you on payment of the deposit. Harlequin might try to claim that this is a typographical error. And get you to accept a new contract. Our advice would be to refuse and keep your original contract. But it is up to you.
@ 36 read my post. BTW it’s a Judgment not a court transcript!
Hi FDNRM, I may well be misreading you, but lately you have been coming across as less pro-Harlequin as you have been in the past. Has something happened recently to cause you to view HP in a different light?
FDNRM Mr. Ames had promised to make the transcripts public. To date he has failed to do so. And he had a very good reason not too.
The UK authorities were represented in Ireland throughout the trial.
The Hon. Judge has picked our what he considered to be the most relevant parts of the case and put them in his judgement. Including a reference to the QS’s being unreliable.
The information Harlequin gave to media outlets last week does not tally with the judgement when taken in its entirety.
Their appears to be a manic obsession by some to divert attention away from the core issues.
Just to repeat. The judge has ordered Mr. O Halloran to pay back 0.3 % of monies taken by Harlequin and the Ames family.
Just to put this in context. Mr. Ames spent 0.56 % of all monies taken in deposits from purchasers on a two day launch at the grove hotel. Mr. Ames and his family “borrowed” 1.4% of purchaser funds to buy properties fir him and his family. He however did not seek the permission of the purchasers to do this.
Mr. and Mrs. Ames were at pains to point out that the 0.3% in essence prevented them in achieving completions of projects for their purchasers. No mention of the 1.4% borrowed.
@Ralph 10.41 Just about every point in this post is inaccurate and ill informed which leads me to believe that you are making a lot of assumptions in your analysis.
Well this is all very interesting…
FDNRM apologies, it is a very stressful time for all concerned. We have copies of contracts from the period 2006 – 2008. We are fully aware of the business model during this time. The business model was also addressed in some detail in the Irish Court Case and is referenced in the transcripts as opposed to the judgement. Would you be prepared to state how much you paid for your unit? And or would you be prepared to state how much of the purchase price you paid prior to 2010. Ie the stage payments. We fully respect your decision should you not choose to do so.
As previously stated this is not a personal attack on you or an attack on your character. We have thousands of documents on which we have based our analysis. We have historical and relatively recent information. We are not basing our analysis on here say, rumour, innuendo or conjecture. We have passed on “OUR” analysis to the relevant parties with an interest in Harlequin.
All we are doing in this forum is to test the information being provided on this forum against the actual facts as they become available.
Some of the comments on this forum lead us to believe there is confusion as to your position with Harlequin. However it should be pointed out to all, that each individuals arrangement or agreement is between the Individual concerned and Harlequin and is of no concern to anyone else unless that individual is prepared to share that information. And this includes you. If you are happy with Harlequin then fine. That will have to be accepted by all parties. If you are willing to state why you are happy with Harlequin better still.
If you are unhappy then use this open forum
as a means to ask questions. This might help you make an informed decision.
The Irish judgement is just that. And as such must be read as a single source document.
As has been pointed out there has been a lot of inaccurate reporting of the facts of the judgement. In essence it is being sensationalised. Again remember the award is for 0.3% of all deposit monies taken.
Hi Ralph, I’m sure many people would be more than happy to share their experience with you, but would probably want to know who you and your organisation are first?
@Ralf, “As previously stated this is not a personal attack on you or an attack on your character” Oh yes? And I quote :He along with many others is clinging on to a belief that Mr. Ames or Mr. Fatchet will perform some kind of miracle.”
“Apologies FDNRM I inadvertently called you Bob. The bloody cat is in the room and the kids call him Bob. As in Bob no hope. Lol”
“His current circumstances mean he is dependant on his investment as a major part of his income.”
“A guy is working in a good job, he sees an advert for a villa in paradise. ………….Oh yeah in my hypothetical story the guy looses his job and is now on state benefits. So the last thing he wants or needs is to loose his investment. So he becomes an avid supporter of the developer.”
Very Innocent comments? NOT. You have personally quoted me, and me only several times, in your posts. As Sid has said “perhaps we should know who you and your organisation are first” Until you do that do not refer to me in your posts and I have no intention of engaging in any further dialog with you. I attempted that earlier in your postings and you have abused that. In the meantime I will let you carry on posting uninformed rubbish guess work.
Hi Sid we have concluded our look at Harlequin and sent our analysis to the relevant authorities. The purpose of the posts on this forum was really to get the forum back to discussing issues relevant to Harlequin and indeed those connected to Harlequin in one way or another.
Our purpose is to generate interesting debate on issues raised backed up by information available.
Those who wish to participate can do so freely, even going so far as to say that anyone should be able to make sensible comments either pro or anti Harlequin, if we make a statement of fact as we perceive it then we fully accept the right of anyone to question the veracity of the information provided by us. As we would with them.
We have also thought it prudent to remain anonymous just for the time being, as you yourself choose to do.
We hope this is acceptable to you.
FDNRM et Al. Our hypothetical story was just that.
The figures quoted in the story as to the purchase price could not have been real. To have been real would mean that Harlequin sold properties not only well below market value but most importantly below the cost to complete.
Our statement that you and many others are clinging onto the hope that Mr. Ames and Mr. Fatchett will pull off some miracle may not be true in your case and as such we apologise to you. However it must be accepted that most people do not want to loose their investments, many purchasers can ill afford to loose the money they paid Harlequin. Many are struggling to meet monthly commitments since Harlequin stopped making payments on the monthly interest due to them.
And as a consequence will cling onto any hope that might save them their money. There is nothing wrong with this.
But FDNRM you relied on documents provided to you by Harlequin in order to satisfy you to allow you make payments for your unit.
Those documents were NOT prepared by a QS. The TVA documents you saw had a signature. It was not an original. TVA did NOT provide a QS role to Harlequin. TVA provided an Architectural role ONLY at Buccament Bay.
As for any similarities between our hypothetical story and your circumstances those are purely coincidental and apologies again if you taken offence by our posts.
The Irish judgement in itself demonstrates how far the Ames family are willing to go to implicate everyone else apart from themselves in this shambles.
At no point has Mr Ames accepted partial responsibility for the absolutely shocking way in which he made no effort to protect purchasers funds. He blames accountants, (both Wilkins Kennedy and BDO )builders, (Ridgeview and ICE Group), lawyers (Dla Piper for over charging). Procure it Direct and Andy Smith. Jeremy Newman, The SFO, Garreth Fatchet, Nikki Crozier, BBC Panorama, Matthew Hill, RLB International QS firm, The UK print media, Jon Austin, The Government of Barbados etc etc etc
Ralph aka Jeremy Newman.
BBaywatch clearly has not read the section of the judgment called “The Role of Wilkins Kennedy Accountants, Mr. Martin MacDonald and Mr. Jeremy Newman”.
TS – Whoever he is does’nt mitigate the math……0.03%, rsvp.
Sorry —0.30%
Anon it is a warped view that reads exactly like Harlecon. The case was for money sent to Ireland and other cases will take place in the Caribbean where the majority was allegedly sent. It is the same old Harlecon propaganda.
There are also other considerations such as the cost involved in replacing the contractor.
What a coincidence that the shamed pair Jeremy Newman and Martin MacDonald take a pounding in the press and Ralph magically appears to troll and misinform.
TS – Sorry, it does’nt wash. You are in effect saying that Ridgeview,
ICE, Procure-it-Direct and Krauss-Manning and ALL the QS,
Architectural and Accounting firms “were out to get Harlequin”
Good grief man, do you realize how idiotic that sounds?
TS what are your views on the very serious allegations made by Harlequin’s witnesses about RLB.
We have re read the Judgement in its entirety and cannot find anywhere, not even an oblique reference to any hint that Mr. Newman had engaged in any wrong doing.
We also find it rather odd that Mr. Newman was engaged by Harlequin. Surely as an employee of Wilkins Kennedy it was they who were engaged by Harlequin and Mr. Newman was tasked with doing some work for Harlequin by his superiors in Wilkins Kennedy.
The other issue not clear from the judgement is did Mr. O Halloran or his companies engage the services of Wilkins Kennedy or was Mr. Newman moonlighting,?
The shamed pair apparently took a pounding in the press as a result of the miss leading information provided by Harlequin to media outlets. This should be redressed in a professional manner in the next few weeks.
Again TS your inference with relevance to the Harlecon site is a little premature. A competent UK court is due to decide that matter in the next 12 months.
The amount being claimed by Harlequin in the Caribbean is 1.7% of the total deposit taken by Harlequin.
This compared to the 47% taken by Mrs. Ames in commissions through her company HMSSE and the 8.7% that the Ames family took from purchasers between loans and investments in companies to which the purchasers have no stake. Airlines, Travel Agents, The loan, Properties in Dubai etc.
And it is still remarkable that you fail to comment on RLB. Harlequin have alleged they tempered with Reports.
On the issue of replacing contractors, did Harlequin not set up their own contracting firm, with Andy Smith of Procure It Direct being held out as the Managing Director?
And has not Harlequin and Mr. Ames not accused this company and Mr. Smith of theft too, with Mr. Smith claiming he is owed close to 1 million USD.
The business model falls apart when over a third of deposits go in commissions. It is a show stopper. Ames then spent fortunes on himself, and other non construction related items. No need to blame harlecon or o’haloran for that.did not check outdoor plumbing himself? Did not check to see if marina had started before telling the world it was almost complete? His staff sent out wildly misleading and simply untrue promotional material. He said there was guaranteed financing. He said construction was going apace. Projects did not even have planning. The picture is one of a hopelessly incompetent developer, and an at best sly, possibly fraudulent businessman. How can anyone else be held responsible?
Why were Wilkins Kennedy, Mr. MacDonald or Jeremy Newman never made defendants in Harlequin’s multi jurisdictional actions. Maybe Harlequin should add them to the Caribbean cases.
In order to provide a semblance of credence to what Harlequin have to say, they could start by publishing a letter from the SFO stating that they are no longer under investigation. Then maybe Harlequin can tell us who will replace Matt Ames as General Manager of the Buccament Bay Resort, whilst he attends to some important matters back home in the UK.
The Ames family could also alay the fears of purchasers by stating that they are not funding nor part funding Matt Ames’s defence in his up coming criminal trial.
Harlequin should also state when they intend to pay the employees at their Buccament Bay Resort. The employees have been on 50% pay for 3 months and have received no pay for the month of July.
Ralph: Fantastic. FDNRM not going to engage with you any further – what a result!. Please go easy on yourself, don’t take it to heart or lose any sleep. LOL
@Ralph, try page 17. So Newman who was working for Wilkins Kennedy tried to get advise about ICE pulling out of the contract. Talk about a conflict of interests. Also page 20, again a total conflict of interests.
@TS I’m with you, Ralf is just a propaganda exercise as he knows the net is tightening on others.
Why O’Halloran is not being investigated by the police for fraud I do not know.
Also it would appear that the money awarded by the court only relates to money transferred by O’Halloran to Irish accounts and not the total amount misappropriated.
icu4wotur Sadly you may have spoken too soon. FDNRM We understand your frustration here. A conflict of interest you say. This appears to be a common theme used by Harlequin to cover a multitude of issues.
I would be very surprised if Wilkins Kennedy did not have safe guards in place to deal with this. Do you know which office Mr. Newman worked for? It might be an issue worth raising with Wilkins Kennedy.
In the same vain would you consider the actions of Grant Thornton to be a conflict of interest.
Were RLB also not conflicted? Were not Harlequin’s own Caribbean lawyers working for both Mr. O Halloran and Harlequin. Is this not a conflict? You claim to have read the transcripts, are they not full of conflicts. Andy Townsends Brother was employed by a subcontractor of Mr. O Halloran’s companies. Is this a conflict of interest? ? Mr. O Halloran and Mr. Ames use Virgin, Is this not a conflict?
Harlequin’s own employees signed off independant QS reports. Which you paid money against. Is this not a conflict? No sorry this is fraud.
@Ralph, I will comment on something I know about and the many items you quote are unproved. Suggest you put up your evidence, particularly relating to the QS report. Lets see if I get an e-mail back regarding that shall we? Lots of allegations, no proof, certainly not in the transcripts except o’Halloran and his associates were part of a massive fraud on HP. And you cannot deny that.
Which Net are we talking about?
How is the defamation case progressing? How is the professional negligence case progressing ?
The net closed in Ireland did it not? Ames got his victory Got awarded 0.3% did he not? How much more do you need to close that particular net to close.
How is the SFO case progressing?
Or the Essex police case ?
Did the Oranges ever ripen ?
Has Mr. Ames sent a pre action protocol to RLB yet?
Has the case against Port Vale concluded?
How are the Stat demand cases coming along?
How are the 15 current private investor cases in the Eastern Caribbean Courts coming along?
How is the action in the Eastern Caribbean Courts by ex employees of Harlequin coming along?
Are there still freezing orders against the personal assets of Mr. and Mrs. Ames?
How are the cases against the IFA’s going?
How are the cases against agents coming along?
How is the case between Procure It Direct and Harlequin coming along?
Or are you talking about the criminal case in September against Matt Ames.
So many nets closing, so many nooses tightening, So much confusion.
So lets all just concentrate on the accountants shall we. That way its so easy not to get confused?
Good. It’s getting exciting again.
Maybe good will prevail over evil after all.
@Ralf and your proof that the QS reports were falsified?
FDNRM The reports you have should contain signatures. It might be worth looking at them. We have copies of 67 reports. In ours the signatures are all “Exactly” the same. I suppose the easiest thing however to do is to call TVA and ask if they ever provided a QS role to Harlequin. When we called them they explained that they only provided an Architectural role and were adamant that they did not provide a QS role. Again you refer to the transcripts. Have you seen these transcripts? If so could you please enlighten us as to what Mrs. Ames had to say about her management of HMSSE ?
We have yet to see the transcripts but I am led to believe that section is very revealing indeed.
Back to the QS reports. This will have to be dealt with by the authorities and it will be wrong of us to make our findings on these public at this time. I hope you understand.
Massive Fraud yes absolutely, perpetrated by Harlequin perhaps. Look at Matt Ames the Orange never falls far from the tree.
As we have said previously, you are entitled to your opinion. It appears that you are happy with Harlequin. We are not here to dissuade those who are convinced that Harlequin is a sound investment. We are here to try and shed some light on issues which have yet to be addressed.
ensure your seats are in the upright position and your seatbelt is securely fastened….looks like its gonna get a bit bumpy
I didn’t mean transcripts, I meant court ruling. You haven’t answered my posting of 6.07 regarding Newman.
fdnrm – Maybe I’m incorrect but would’nt a fraud case against
O’Hallaran be prosecuted in SVG and would’nt a certain unnamed
Prime Minister not be to happy to see a lot of dirty laundry
necessarily exposed? Just wondering…
FDNRM We must apologise. You are asking us to make comment on the judgement and you refer us to page numbers. Sadly the judgement as it appears on line is not paginated, as in it has no page numbers. Could you possibly be referring to a copy of the judgement provided to you by Harlequin? Would this also perchance contain annotated notes. If Harlequin have provided you with the judgement could you also get them to provide you with a copy of the transcripts. We have just received an anonymous email with an attachment which claims to be a court transcript.
The transcript is bizarre in the extreme.
Sit back folks this is so weird. We are typing as we speak. The transcript basically describes how Mrs. Ames states that she does not know how many units HMSSE sold.
She states that she has no knowledge as to the finances of HMMSE. It is her husband and Mr. Mac Donald who deal with this.
Ok this has to be a joke. Mrs. Ames is the managing director of HMMSE or was until Shipleys took on the administration. Sge signed off the accounts. The audited accounts every year. Her husband and Mr. MacDonald are not even directors.
FDNRM can you get a hold of Mr. Ames urgently and ask for a copy of the transcripts so that this rubbish can be put to bed once and for all. If what we have just received is wrong, we will apologise unreservedly to the Ames family and join the attack against anyone who dares speak out against them.
This is getting too good to believe!!!!!!!!!!
And was so intent on getting an early night! It’s beginning to feel a lot like Christmas 🙂
This is so weird. Mr. Ames states he has 5000 investors and sold in excess of 6000 properties.
This has to be a wind up. Mr. Ames says he had initial concerns about Mr. Newman working for the ICE Group but was then happy as Mr. MacDonald told Mr. Ames that Mr. Newman would be Harlequin’s eyes and ears in ICE group. Was Newman a spy. This is ridiculous. Did Newman become a double agent. My name is Bond, Jeremy Bond.lol
This cant be real. Did Ames’s plan backfire? If this is true then Ames had no issue with a conflict of interest. Sorry he did but only after it did not benefit him.
Mr. Ames you promised to make the transcripts public. We now plead with you to do so to put this madness to bed once and for all.
We pray no one else gets sight of these alleged transcripts.
I hear the all night Spar in Basildon has had a late rush on toilet tissue and has now sold out
I have read the court judgement and find the whole thing a bit odd.
Although there was no contract in place, there appeared to have been discussions about a rate to be paid per square foot and a price of $79 million for the project.
Against that backdrop, were the payments to O’Halloran not just payments on account to a building contractor? If they were, then if he spent the money on planes or weddings, that is entirely up to him.
I guess that must have all been covered in the case and that it hinged on the fact that ICE was “almost insolvent”. Strange though; never seen anything like it in construction before. QSs crawling all over the project and not one brave enough to tell Mr Ames that he was mad to embark on the project on the basis that he did.
Somehow one senses there is more to this then meets the eye. The transcripts we have seen tonight paint a terrible picture of how Mr.Ames ran his business. He makes himself out to be a naive and sometimes terrified individual who was bullied by Mr. O Halloran.
No one can write their signature exactly the same, even if it is done 100 times. It is how handwriting experts determine forgeries . If all the signatures are EXACTLY a the same, they are surely digitally copied and applied to the documents in question.
There appears to be a certain amount of irony to this case. O’Haloran’s business relied entirely on Harlequin and was insolvent and Harlequin claim unjust enrichment against O’Haloran. Is Harlequin not trading insolvent itself? It does not pay the interest payments to purchasers, it does not pay staff on time if at all in some instances, does not pay many creditors. It is not able to meet its financial commitments, and therefore is by definition insolvent. And yet, the man behind it all has taken huge dividends from the sales company (HMSSE), and has lived the high life himself using what can only be purchaser money. He entirely relied on purchaser money himself, as O’Haloran relied on Harlequin. Mr Ames had been recently bankrupt when Harlequin was set up, he had very limited personal funds at the time. The fact that the dividends were taken from HMSSE, a separate legal entity to the Caribbean company, does not change the fact that the source of funds with which he enriched himself is the same as what was funding the Caribbean companies (and ultimately O’Haloran’s lifestyle too) – namely purchaser money. The developer of the properties should not be doing this, pure and simple. Any half decent or semi experienced developer would know that US$96 per square foot is not going to build you quality in SVG. The list of facts that demonstrate his negligence is very long, but the irony does appear fairly rich in this case.
His incompetence lead to negligence (on a massive scale). His lies (which were endless, seems like a sickness) lead to deception. Fraud whichever way you look at it.
@Ralph, stop ducking the question, take the court judgement on line and PRINT it off which is what I did, so answer the question asked above regarding Newman. Also you keep referring back to sight of the transcripts, I haven’t seen them, you have in which case publish them. I see lots of accusations coming from you but not backed up.
Also why is it weird that there are 5000 investors and 6000 properties invested in?
This is utterly pathetic. Has Ralph, Anon or any detractors actually read the judgment?
Anyone who reads the judgment will see that Jeremy Newman and Martin MacDonald are heavily implicated. It is false to say otherwise.
Jeremy Newman and Martin MacDonald worked for Harlequin as representatives of their accountants and auditors Wilkins Kennedy.
Jeremy Newman and Martin MacDonald are defendants in the defamation case due in the next few months.
Those are the facts.
The Role of Wilkins Kennedy Accountants, Mr. Martin MacDonald and Mr. Jeremy Newman
75. Wilkins Kennedy had been accountants to a business run by Mrs. Carol Ames and subsequently became accountants to Harlequin. The contact between Harlequin and Wilkins Kennedy was Mr. Martin MacDonald (“Mac”). Mac became more than a member of an accountancy firm retained by Harlequin. He became a close friend and confidante of Mr. and Mrs. Ames and, as time went by, Mr. Ames relied more and more on his assistance. Eventually, he became, to all intents and purposes, the Chief Financial Officer of Harlequin. Mr. Jeremy Newman was retained to give tax advice to Harlequin. After some time, he became involved in giving advice to the ICE Group. This was a matter of concern to Mr. Ames, who was reassured that sufficient safeguards were put in place to avoid any conflict of interest on the part of personnel within Wilkins Kennedy. On 23rd November, 2012, Mr. Newman resigned from Wilkins Kennedy and has now gone into business with Mr. Padraig O’Halloran. Together, they have set up a new construction and civil engineering company in Jordan.
76. Again and again, throughout this lengthy trial, evidence was produced which showed what a pivotal role Mac played in the day-to-day business of Harlequin. What also emerged in the course of the trial was the growing relationship that developed between Mr. Padraig O’Halloran and Mac. It developed to such a point that Mac attended the stag party of the first named defendant at Monte Carlo during the Grand Prix weekend in 2010. Although Mr. Newman gave evidence in the trial, Mr. MacDonald did not. He neither turned up at the trial nor furnished a witness statement.
77. I am satisfied that the evidence establishes that by the spring of 2010, Mr. MacDonald was working in league with the first named defendant and he had a serious conflict of interest in continuing to act for Harlequin. Mr. Ames felt very let down by Mr. MacDonald, and with some justification. By that time, Mr. Newman was also working for the ICE Group.
@TS I agree with you. Ralph just keeps throwing out accusations and suggestions to try and detract from the real points of the court case. DA won and the ICE group were culpable of fraud. It’s down in black and white. And to suggest he cannot answer because “the page numbers are missing” is unbelievable.
What an amusing game is being played out here. Apparently if the supporters of each fraudster can shout loud enough and often enough that the other fraudster is worse it absolves the fraudster they are rooting for.
Incidentally anyone reading the judgement properly will note that neither Ames nor Newman were accused of any wrongdoing. That doesn’t mean either are innocent it merely means that it had no part to play in the case. The judge was quite clear that all that counted was whether O’Halloran knowingly, or was reckless as to the truth, misrepresented whether Phase 1 of Buccament Bay would be completed by July 1st 2010 and thereby obtained money from Harlequin on that basis. The Judge found that, on the balance of probability, he did knowingly misrepresent the likelihood of completion and therefore found against him and ordered the return of the money misappropriated to Ireland. No other damages other than the money misappropriated was ordered to be paid. I wonder who will pay the costs of the court case. Answer – the investors of course.
FDNRM The issue of the conflict of interest as it pertains to Mr. Newman is rather simple. Mr. Newman was an employee of Wilkins Kennedy, not a partner, just an employee. ICE group was a client of Wilkins Kennedy as were Harlequin. It must be noted that ICE group was a client of Wilkins Kennedy’s Egham office whilst Harlequin were clients of Wilkins Kennedy’s Southend Office.
Each of the Wilkins Kennedy’s offices operate separately. Its exactly the same with Grant Thornton.Grant Thornton in Ireland were assisting Harlequin as expert witnesses , whilst Grant Thornton in the UK are looking into the business activities of Harlequin and the Ames family. In both cases there is no conflict of interest. It might be perceived by you or the average Joe on the street that there is. But this kind of arrangement is commonplace.
As Mr. Newman was an employee of Wilkins Kennedy and tasked by his senior managers he would therefore not have been retained by Harlequin. His company (The Egham Office might have been) but this arrangement is not clear from the Judgement.
However regardless of all of these facts what is incredible is that in the various extracts from the court transcripts we have, it is clear that Mr. Ames himself did not consider there being any conflict of interest, having being satisfied that Mr. Newman would be his eyes and ears whilst working for the ICE Group.
Therefore the aggrieved party in this instance as it pertains to a conflict of interest was in actual fact the ICE Group and Mr. O Halloran.
It wasn’t until later that Mr. Ames complained about a conflict of interest quite possibly because Mr. Newman in upholding the ethics of his profession refused to be, in all essence a spy for Mr. Ames.
With respect to the very vociferous protestations by TS on the Issue of Wilkins Kennedy and Mr. MacDonald. It has to be noted that neither the company nor Mr. MacDonald were witnesses in the court case. Again what is unclear from the judgement is whether Harlequin requested or supbonead Wilkins Kennedy, but from the court transcripts we have it does not appear that Harlequin made any attempt to involve Mr. MacDonald or Wilkins Kennedy in the proceedings. Which is very odd given the allegations made against Mr. MacDonald and Wilkins Kennedy prior to, during and after the proceedings.
The judge himself found it odd that Mr. MacDonald had not presented a witness statement nor had he attended court, therefore in the absence of any rebuttal evidence in the Irish Court Case the Judge had to rely on the evidence of the plaintiffs.
Wilkins Kennedy and Mr. MacDonald may very well have had valid reasons not to turn up in Ireland but those reasons as of yet remain unknown to us, but Mr. Ames could take an action against Wilkins Kennedy in the UK. It is a fact that for the past 3 years he has stated that he has commenced a professional claim against Wilkins Kennedy yet as of today’s date no court action has commenced.
In simple terms the allegations by Mr. Ames and Harlequin against Wilkins Kennedy and Mr. MacDonald remain unchallenged, although we suspect that Wilkins Kennedy will address this issue in the UK.
FDNRM Mr. Ames has stated publically and in letters to his agents and purchasers that he will make the court transcripts public. He has failed to do so. We are sure however that at some stage members of the press will receive the relevant transcripts.
Why Mr. Ames has not made the transcripts public is any bodies guess. In the information he provided to the press last week he made numerous references to the transcripts, even noting the transcript page numbers, paragraph nos and relevant line numbers, however he did not provide the media with the supporting documentation as on the transcripts.
FDNRM has asked why we don’t make the transcripts public. We unlike Mr. Ames have never stated we will. We will however analyse them and pass our findings onto the relevant authorities for further action should the authorities deem that necessary.
@Who’s the worst fraudster.
“Incidentally anyone reading the judgement properly will note that neither Ames nor Newman were accused of any wrongdoing. That doesn’t mean either are innocent it merely means that it had no part to play in the case.”
Quite so – the judge is reported as saying –
quote “A great deal of this trial was taken up with matters that were peripheral to the issues which I have to decide and did little more than add colour.” unquote
colour?? – that would be Technicolor and 3D according to some of the HP trolls, but then conflating entirely separate matters into one has been standard practice by HP for years.
@Ralph, Despite being “an average Joe” I can read. I suggest you read the judgement in more detail.Your defense of Newman is incorrect, he was more than just an employee of WK. As you seem unable to print, or save the judgement, I will quote the point directly.
67) “it emerged in the evidence, also, that Mr O’Halloran and key advisors, including Mr. Newman, had sought advice in February of 2010 from Knowles, a consultancy firm specialising in construction disputes. In Mr. Newman’s evidence the meeting was primarily concerned with assessing the possibility of the ICE Group “discontinuing” its involvement with the Buccament Bay project at short notice. However, it appears that they were advised that this would not be possible. The first named defendant claimed in evidence that the company had sought this advice because of failures on the part of the plaintiffs to make payments on schedule. Indeed, the first named defendant claimed that the ICE Group is owed a significant sum of money by the plaintiffs. However, there was no evidence of complaints having been made by the ICE Group or The first named defendant regarding purported difficulties in obtaining payment from the plaintiffs. Indeed, the meeting with Knowles took place in the same month that an agreement was reached with the plaintiffs for an increase in the payments to be made in pursuance of the Buccament Bay project. Around this time, also, the first named defendant and his senior advisors travelled to the UK, Jordan, Romania and Morocco canvassing for new business. It appears that a ticket had been purchased for Mr. MacDonald, but that he had ultimately not travelled with the other members of the party.”
Also Ralph you now admit to having copies of the court transcripts. So stop playing your silly games, either post them up or stop being selective with your drip drip of information.
There again what would I know being an “average Joe”
@BBaywatch, Trolls? Yes usual response to an informed debate trying to get to the truth. At least I post all the relevant information, not selective text to misinterpret the total item. Sound familiar?
Whilst TS’s manic obsession with Wilkins Kennedy continues, TS nor anyone else supportive of Harlequin has addressed the issue raised in the judgement with respect to RLB. RLB is one of the world’s largest and respected QS and Project management firms in the world. Yet and as contained in the judgement Mr. Garreth Ronan a witness for Harlequin suggested that RLB had tempered documents they produced. The Hon. Judge was just as vehement in his assertion that RLB were also conflicted.
Oddly Mr. Ronan’s LinkedIn page details have changed considerably since the conclusion of the Irish Case.
He no longer works for Harlequin. His LinkedIn page now calls him Garret. R, not Garret Ronan. He also had removed all reference to Harlequin, now stating that he is VP of Hotels and Resorts Barbados.
Mr. Ronan has in fact left Barbados and now works for the Japanese themed restaurant Zuma. Again evidence has come to light which casts doubt on the evidence that Mr. Ronan provided in the Irish case. Despite the allegations levied against RLB in the Irish Court , Harlequin, Mr. Ames and indeed Mr. Ronan invited RLB to take on the project management of the Buccament Bay Resort in late 2010. RLB executives even stayed free of charge as personal guests at the Buccament Bay Resort whilst deciding on whether to take on the PM role or not. RLB after due consideration turned down the role being offered them by Harlequin.
FDNRM ICE Group was not a defendant in the Irish case and as such no judgment has been made against the ICE Group in any jurisdiction.
The revelation by this court case that Ames did not have a written contract with a Construction Company to build a multimillion dollar resort in St Vincent is mind boggling . Sending hundreds of thousands and then millions of pounds to them on a weekly basis, without a contract is the act of an idiot or a madman. He can blame everyone and anyone, but ultimately he is the person responsible for the complete screw up that has taken place with investors’ money.
FDNRM is a genuine purchaser, he has also been acquainted with Mr. Ames long before the Caribbean developments were ever conceived. But the evidence to date demonstrates that his only involvement with Harlequin is as an innocent purchaser.
This however might explain why FDNRM was singled out by Mr. Ames for special treatment with respect to the payment of his guranteed returns.
We must reiterate that aside from his long term personal relationship with the Ames family there is absolutely no evidence to suggest that he is in anyway involved in any alleged wrong doing by the Ames family or the Harlequin Group.
However we would ask him to ask Mr. Ames to let him have sight of the court transcripts to allow him to make his own definitive informed opinion on the facts as they pertain to the issues being discussed.
This would give FDNRM credibility in the eyes of his peers on this forum.
Yatinkiteasy Its even worse then that. The court transcripts which Mr. Ames promised to produce but has failed to date to do, demonstrate that the ICE Group requested a fidic yellow book contract be entered into on numerous occasions and the transcripts refer to a number of email exchanges on the matter. It was Mr. Ames according to the transcripts we have seen who refused to enter into a contract.
Jeremy
It has already been discussed that the court transcripts are copyrighted. That is why Erika Broughton and Nikki Crozier could not post them when Paudie O’Halloran provided them.
Regarding RLB how do you know they are not to be the focus of future action? Can you not see that Paudie O’Halloran, Jeremy Newman, Martin MacDonald and Wilkins Kennedy would clearly be the priority? Your obsession with RLB is an obvious diversionary tactic.
If you represent a company or group, why are you hiding here?
@Ralph… Why would he not want a contract? It just does not make any sense at all.
@Ralph, nice try but you have ignored paragraph 67 AGAIN.
Your posting above is both inaccurate and personal. i have come to the conclusion that as you have singled me out for attention you must some how see me as a threat.
1)Known DA before my investment, WRONG
2)Special treatment WRONG
3)Not involved with any wrongdoing RIGHT.
4)Ask for sight of court documents to make my own informed opinion. YOU SUPPLY THEM
5)Credibility in the eyes of his peers on this forum COULD NOT GIVE A S**T
Also I have not suggested ICE group was a defendant in the Irish court case. Quoting directly from the judgement shows the involvement of Newman in the conspiracy, Your tactics are obvious on here, deflect all questions and comments with another statement. You motives have been found out.
@Yatinkiteasy, regarding a contract, he was of course wrong not to have one in place. But the reason he did not was that he was persuaded by MacDonald, a trusted friend and employee of WK not to have one. Macdonald was now found out to be part of the ICE fraud.
If ICE suggested entering into a FIDIC Yellow Book contract then they didn’t know what they were doing. The Yellow Book is a specialist contract for use on electrical and mechanical works, not for “normal” construction work.
@TS, are court transcripts readily available to anyone, or just to people directly associated with the case? I think your ID “slip” higher up is quite pertinent.
Yatinkiteasy According to the court transcripts Mr. Ames on the advice of Mr. MacDonald felt that a contract would tie them down and Harlequin needed flexibility. The transcripts don’t detail why the flexibility was required. But they are very clear and despite the fact that the ICE Group requested contracts on a number of occasions Harlequin and Mr. Ames refused to accede to the requests.
Misdirection is rife. It is Ames and Ames alone who got purchasers to part with their money via lies and deceit and delivered 2 per cent of his sold product. He gave the info to ifa’s and agents, and masterminded the scam. He will blame everyone else and the more misdirection the better. Purchasers have been ripped off by him. Others may have joined the robbing gravy train, but the focus has to surely be on him. Clearly was clueless as a developer – no contract with builder, thought he could build five star for $96, terrible locations for resorts and losing fortunes operationally. Thankfully for him though, got paid up front so he’s sorted.
@Ralph, I suggest you stop quoting from court transcripts, no one else has a copy and what you say cannot be substantiated. To the point where the judgement is different to what you say.
“Mr. David Ames said that he was persuaded not to have a written contract by Mr. Martin MacDonald who had become a close and trusted advisor and confidante. Throughout the proceedings, Mr. MacDonald was generally referred to by the soubriquet of “Mac”. Mac was a partner in the accountancy firm of Wilkins Kennedy. Mrs. Ames got to know him when she was employed with Patten Pools (Construction) Ltd. As the plaintiffs’ business grew, they needed someone who could advise them on financial matters and Mac became the point of contact between the plaintiffs and Wilkins Kennedy. But he was more than that. He eventually became de facto the Chief Financial Officer of the plaintiff’s company as he carried out work going way beyond the role of an accountant. He also became a close personal friend of Mr. and Mrs. Ames and they trusted him absolutely. Although Mr. MacDonald played a pivotal role in the events giving rise to this litigation, it is of some significance that he was not called to give evidence, nor did he supply a witness statement.”
“For whatever reason, Mr. Ames did not see the need for a written contract and he appears to have willingly gone along with the suggestion that the parties to the building contract for the resort at Buccament Bay would work things out on an ad hoc basis as they went along. As matters transpired, this turned out to be a very poor decision on his part.”
Somewhat different to your suggestion that ICE requested them but DA turned them down.
FDNRM
Dear sir, firstly let us apologise to you for the inaccurate post earlier. In it we stated that whilst you are well acquainted with Mr. Ames you were to the evidence we had at that time nothing more then an innocent purchaser albeit acquainted with the Ames family.
It appears that you now do indeed have access to the court transcripts, your posting of 12.35 pm describes fairly accurately Mr. MacDonalds role as it pertained to the issue of the contract, as is contained in the transcript. You will note that we have also referred to the same transcript at 12.38.
Your comment to TS is also now somewhat hollow as it appears you also have a copy of the transcripts. So how far up the totem pole are you.?
We no longer now consider you an innocent purchaser but at the very least a very good and loyal friend of the Ames family but possibly also complicit in the alleged wrong doing and fraud by that family.
Sadly you were the first to refer to Mr. MacDonalds role vis a vee the contract issue as is referred to in the transcripts.
@ Ralph… You are a breath of fresh air…. Thank you!
@ FDNRM… Why oh why do you keep up the defence of such a scam?
FDNRM We are prepared to give you the benefit of the doubt on your last post only with specific reference to the fact that you may have extracted the information from the judgement as opposed to the transcripts. Its just that they way you posted your post of 12.35 was exactly as it appeared in the transcript where as there is s subtle difference in way its worded in the judgement. We will give you the benefit of doubt that this was just pure coincidence on your part.
Jeremy/Ralph FDNRM was quoting from the judgment which you clearly have not read.
FDNRM that is correct they were only distributed to those associated with the case. It was a 31 day trial so you can imagine how many pages there would be.
@Ralph, At least you realize that the court transcripts are different to the court judgement. And I’m not “up ant totem pole” And I dont really care about how you think of me. You are obviously personally attacking me to try and discredit me. People like Conned now think you are a God send. Well I for one can see straight through you. You are probably either Jones/Newman/MacDonald who can see the next court case coming and will do anything to get support from the baying crowd on here.
The fact you have the transcripts suggest you are from the O’Halloran camp.Your comments regarding MacDonald being the “good guy” regarding the contracts advise is pure farce.
Thanks TS just as I suspected. I think we all now know who “Ralph” is
Ralph suddenly appears after all the bad press about Wilkins Kennedy, Jeremy Newman and Martin MacDonald.
Ralph writes exactly like Jeremy Newman did on Harlecon.
Ralph has the same Robin Hood facade as Harlecon in pretending to represent a mystery group.
Jeremy Newman is now unemployed and unemployable with all of his hopes pinned on the success of Kelltek which he runs with the fraudster Paudie O’Halloran.
No wonder Jeremy has all the time on his hands to write Harleconish ramblings on here.
TS FDNRM The documents containing the transcripts may well be copyrighted but the information contained within those documents is not as it was provided by both parties in the case. One option would be to ask both parties if they had any objections to the transcripts being made public.
The other option would be that someone leaks them. TS you claim that parties unconnected to the case already have copies of the transcripts so god knows who has them now.
We prefer the first option however, because Ames and O Halloran would have to agree to this. If one or other of the parties were not to agree that would be very telling indeed.
Mr. Ames has stated he would make the transcripts public. The question is why has he not. The latest excuse is that the transcripts are copyrighted.
Incidentaly TS how do you know this?
I have heard of court proceedings being “sealed” but I have never
heard of court proceedings being “copyrighted” . Maybe things
work differently in Ireland.
Ralph Newman I asked a question first.
If you represent a company or group that has been interested in the Harlequin situation for years why are you hiding here posting rambling comments?
And as FDNRM asked why have you not released the transcripts yourself?
Ahh TS what you say about Mr. Newman might be true. But lets see if he looses the defamation action first. As for him being unemployed and unemployable who knows but at least he will be at liberty to look for work. If however he wins the defamation case the same might not be said for the Ames family and there in house lawyers. They might just find their liberty a wee bit curtailed.
TS if what you claim is correct and Mr. Newman is unemployed and unemployable well one would have to deduce from this that after he pays his defence costs there will be little or no money left to pay damages to Harlequin. Nor will there be any money to pay Harlequin’s legal costs. So why are Harlequin spending vast amounts of purchasers funds on legal actions in the knowledge that the defendants are all but penny less.
That’s if Mr. Newman looses, what if he wins??????
@Ralph, the question is, why has O’Halloran not made the transcripts public? Or as TS asked, Crozier or Erica who admitted she had them, supplied by her puppet master O’Halloran. You seemed to have ignored my question regarding Newman and the judgement paragraph 67 in case you have forgotten.
I am sure Newman has assets. Wilkins Kennedy are in the case and they have lots of money.
@Ralph, nice try to turn the tide against HP in the deformation case. However arnt WK part of the defendants as Newman was employed by them and used company information while an employee to post his Harlecon site. That’s means they are potentially liable. And if Newman wins his case why would Ames liberty be at stake. He is not the defendant here.
FDNRM this is a curious little habit of yours; demanding answers on one hand, and refusing to give them on the other. For what it’s worth, to the casual observer it’s fairly clear which case is more compelling.
The idea that it should be a viable argument that Ames was “persuaded” not to have a contract is particularly risible. That’s like a schoolboy blaming the big boys for getting him into trouble. The MD of the company (tricky here I know, as we don’t know which company we’re talking about a lot of the time) has to take responsibility for their own decisions — and the consequences of those decisions. I find it incredible that anyone would think otherwise.
TS let us make this abundantly clear to you. You have no need to know who we are, although this will be made known to you in the fullness of time no doubt. What may or may not be of interest to you in the future is the investigative authorities to which we possibly provide our findings to. It is after all those agencies who will ultimately decide whether there is any merit in prosecuting any members of the Ames family or others in the various Harlequin companies including senior managers, in house solicitors etc.
The fact that O Halloran was found by a competent court to have engaged in fraudulent misrepresentation and deceit does most certainly not in itself exonerate Mr. Ames and the Ames family and there trusted advisors of any wrong doing. In fact the Irish judgement tends to suggest that the management team comprised of a bunch of moronic idiots. At least the transcripts do anyway.
As you have pointed out TS the transcripts are copy righted so let us take some legal advice on the matter in order to figure out how to release them with out breaking the law.
FDNRM just to put your mind at rest. We have looked at para 67. It states that Mr. Newman attended a meeting with Mr. O Halloran. Mr. Newman was seconded to the ICE group of companies by Wilkins Kennedy. So what is the problem. Oh yes the Conflict of Interest. Well we have covered this off in previous posts. if it concerns you that much please feel free to make a complaint directly to Wilkins Kennedy or in the alternative the IACEW. Quotations from the Irish judgement would be very helpful but a copy of the transcripts would seal the deal although not necessarily for you.
@Dug, what a pity you decide to interject without taking the trouble to do some basic background research. The question i am asking is in response to Ralph’s comment that Newman is not implicated in any way in the judgement. I took the trouble to find where he was, quoted the relevant paragraph which “Ralph” chooses to ignore. Hence my prompting. Also your comment that idea that that “Ames was persuaded not to have a contract is particularly risible” ignores the fact of who persuaded him. I suggest you read the full judgement from the court before you start chipping in with your comments. Especially as others have chosen you to “keep an eye” on HP for them and advise.Read and learn.
@Ralph very selective. Are you BBaywatch in disguise? Now lets look at the whole of P67 from the Judgement shall we?
“it emerged in the evidence, also, that Mr O’Halloran and key advisors, including Mr. Newman, had sought advice in February of 2010 from Knowles, a consultancy firm specialising in construction disputes. In Mr. Newman’s evidence the meeting was primarily concerned with assessing the possibility of the ICE Group “discontinuing” its involvement with the Buccament Bay project at short notice. However, it appears that they were advised that this would not be possible. The first named defendant claimed in evidence that the company had sought this advice because of failures on the part of the plaintiffs to make payments on schedule. Indeed, the first named defendant claimed that the ICE Group is owed a significant sum of money by the plaintiffs. However, there was no evidence of complaints having been made by the ICE Group or The first named defendant regarding purported difficulties in obtaining payment from the plaintiffs. Indeed, the meeting with Knowles took place in the same month that an agreement was reached with the plaintiffs for an increase in the payments to be made in pursuance of the Buccament Bay project. Around this time, also, the first named defendant and his senior advisors travelled to the UK, Jordan, Romania and Morocco canvassing for new business. It appears that a ticket had been purchased for Mr. MacDonald, but that he had ultimately not travelled with the other members of the party.”
There is a lot more to P 67 than you would let on isn’t there?
So contrary to your earlier protestations Newman is mentioned in the Judgement, is named as a key adviser to O’Halloran, and was part of his team which tried to pull out of the project a very short notice. Yes?
You are not a very organised group if you were not already aware that stenographers copyright their products.
Are you eating humble pie after you lambasted Ames for not sharing them?
@FDNRM I’ve read it all. That’s what I’m basing my conclusions on — but thanks for the advice notwithstanding. It seems pretty clear to me that nobody emerges from it with an awful lot of dignity — it all seems unnecessarily incestuous to me. That said, my opinions on the issues re “Mac” stand; the onus for the final decision on any company lies with the director (albeit in this case it appears that it was on occasion a de facto director). In my opinion, the notion that the boss was “persuaded” suggests a fairly egregious failing; if he is qualified to marshal hundreds of millions of pounds, he is qualified to discern good advice from bad advice — and should be beyond persuasion by his subordinates (again notable that this Mac was a sort of de facto SFO according to the ruling, but never formally appointed — why conduct your business like that???)
I’ve done plenty of background research — that’s what I’m basing my opinions on.
A number of posters on here have identified the growing list of people that are blamed for this failing — with various promises of litigation in the off-ing. The companies and individuals are varied and widespread, but there is one common denominator. Eventually occam’s razor, if nothing else whatsoever, has to be given fair consideration.
Your arguments would have considerably more gravitas if they weren’t continually based on a defensive footing. You have a fondness for declaring that there is no proof to various allegations, but are reticent and sporadic in offering proof yourself — relying in this case of fragments of the judgement that are hardly compelling. As is common with the company, there is much talk of “things you don’t know about” — but no actual substance to this. You have made several oblique references to forthcoming investment, for example, but have done nothing whatsoever to substantiate this. I’m afraid that as the clouds start to gather, the onus is quite clearly on those standing behind this company to start substantiating their position — and doing so in such a way, that isn’t based on the passive apportioning of blame elsewhere (it is always about Newman or WK or a thousand other people having wronged the company in some way, but so rarely about any positive steps independently of this).
TS when has Mr. Ames in the past abided by the law. Has he found Jesus? He never worried about legal issues when he sold property on land he did not own.
In fact some one has stated that Mr. Ames will be leaking the transcripts soon. Anonymously of course.
Anyway we are confident that the transcripts will copper fasten what both you and FDNRM have been claiming.
@Ralph, so we are agreed then, that Newman was not the innocent bystander that you claimed earlier and was an active participant in O’Halloran’s organisation. Well that was like pulling teeth wasnt it? And until anyone has released a transcript I suggest you stop referring to it At this moment in time it is a meaningless document. Unless of course it is being used as a distraction?.
@Ralph, “Anyway we are confident that the transcripts will copper fasten what both you and FDNRM have been claiming”
Copper-fasten, From the Free Directory “Irish to make (a bargain or agreement) binding. .
Interesting, Irish origin and will confirm what TS and I are saying.
Thank you very much Mr
@FDNRM I’ve read it all. That’s what I’m basing my conclusions on — but thanks for the advice notwithstanding. It seems pretty clear to me that nobody emerges from it with an awful lot of dignity — it all seems unnecessarily incestuous to me. That said, my opinions on the issues re “Mac” stand; the onus for the final decision on any company lies with the director (albeit in this case it appears that it was on occasion a de facto director). In my opinion, the notion that the boss was “persuaded” suggests a fairly egregious failing; if he is qualified to marshal hundreds of millions of pounds, he is qualified to discern good advice from bad advice — and should be beyond persuasion by his subordinates (again notable that this Mac was a sort of de facto SFO according to the ruling, but never formally appointed — why conduct your business like that???)
I’ve done plenty of background research — that’s what I’m basing my opinions on.
A number of posters on here have identified the growing list of people that are blamed for this failing — with various promises of litigation in the off-ing. The companies and individuals are varied and widespread, but there is one common denominator. Eventually occam’s razor, if nothing else whatsoever, has to be given fair consideration.
Your arguments would have considerably more gravitas if they weren’t continually based on a defensive footing. You have a fondness for declaring that there is no proof to various allegations, but are reticent and sporadic in offering proof yourself — relying in this case of fragments of the judgement that are hardly compelling. As is common with the company, there is much talk of “things you don’t know about” — but no actual substance to this. You have made several oblique references to forthcoming investment, for example, but have done nothing whatsoever to substantiate this. I’m afraid that as the clouds start to gather, the onus is quite clearly on those standing behind this company to start substantiating their position — and doing so in such a way, that isn’t based on the passive apportioning of blame elsewhere (it is always about Newman or WK or a thousand other people having wronged the company in some way, but so rarely about any positive steps independently of this).
PS props on the racist stereotyping — quite the sleuth!
FDNRM given that you believe we a plural are a single individual Jeremy Newman. We believe you to be an individual going by the name of Bob xxxxxx. Apologies if we have miss spelt your name. Whilst you have absolutely no idea who we are you did confirm that we knew who you were.
And we do our research. Sadly we have to concede that we are not as articulate as Mr. Newman nor do we profess to be as grammatically correct as Mr. Newman. From now on we will refer to you as Bob.
Now Bob in the past you claimed to have been receiving a return on your investment from Harlequin, indeed sometime back you stated you proved this to Mr. Garret Fatchet of Regulatory Legal.
We also believe you are on benefits of some kind or another. Well that is really not relevant or it might be. We have one little question for you? Did you declare your rental income received from Buccament Bay to the UK authorities? Maybe it slipped your mind? Perhaps? Would you like us to check this out for you? It will not be any trouble for us.
I’m not on anyone’s side, but that was a bit below the belt Ralph.
Jeremy O’Newman?
Bob feel free to call us Jeremy O Halloran, Paudie Newman. even Paudie Mac Newman.
Call us what you like. How about Wilkins O Halloran. Or Jeremy Kennedy. Bob listen to your self ” We know who you are” and now we are going to sue you for telling the truth. Go away you sad little wack job. Lol
Yeah O’Ralph back off! We are beginning to see through you and suspect that your motives are not at all honourable.
It was a little naughty Sid. Lets just get back to the Bob and Simon show shall we. Now where were we Oh yes, those fraudulent accountants Wilkins O’ Halloran or was it Newman Kennedy or …………
Over to you Bob to continue with your story.
Our motives are to demonstrate to all the facts. If this has a negative impact on Harlequin so be it. Harlequin are very adept at spinning the wrong story.
If this is beginning to hit a raw nerve with some we are sorry.
Sadly Bob is still not aware of who we are. There are many out there who want to know the truth and not some sanitised version which will allow the charade to continue.
Its seems ok to attack some individuals on here without being aware of the full facts.
The truth of the matter is out there and we will make it public. But if you guys would like us to back off for a while and give maybe the rescue attempts a chance then just ask and we will.
Its really that simple. Do you want to know the reality of the situation or allow this forum descend into farce once more?
Ralph – You have my vote.
Well Ralph now we all see you for what you are. I must really have you worried now. Do you think some moronic trolls are going to worry me? Your threats are worthless. have you forgotten I was interviewed by the SFO? Do you not think I declared any rental income to them? You are factually wrong on so many items, but believe what you want. Call me what you want. You are making yourselves look like mindless bullies hiding behind a computer screen. Bore off.
@Anon 5.39 good to see you supporting internet bullies. Well done.
Ralph- and mine. I await in great anticipation as to what comes next!
@Ralph, just for clarity, am I supposed to be suing you or are you suing me? Re your post of 5.07.
Bob we were just having some fun granted at your expense. You are attacking individuals on this site without having a knowledge of the full facts. Sadly the transcripts are vital to ascertaining what went on within Harlequin. The judge has even commented that much of the case was taken up with issues not connected to the Irish case.
It is these transcripts that will be of interest to Harlequin purchasers and investors.
Mr. Ames and those around him want to retain control of the company. The transcripts might very well assist in a rescue plan. But Mr. Ames has not even been upfront with Mr.. Fatchet. The transcripts would help in removing the Ames family from the loop once and for all.
There is very little chance of a rescue plan succeeding, but with any member of the Ames family involved there will be no chance. Mr. Ames promised to make the transcripts available. This was at a very early stage in the trial.As the trial progressed Mr.Ames made no further mention of making the transcripts public.
TS has now used the excuse that they are copy righted by the stenographer. The format used by the stenographer is what is copy righted.
Anyhow this is not an issue any more as we have been advised that a full independant transcript will be available shortly.
A tweet on the Regulatory Legal Twitter account in the last few minutes states the following. ” Mixed messages from Harlequin at Tailormade meeting. Meeting minutes paint a different picture to that delivered to us”
Sadly this tweet is exactly what we are talking about.
@Ralph, having some fun at my expense? No mate you crossed the line and are backtracking because you know you did. You are a low life. You still refuse to acknowledge P67 which I have put up here twice which shows you lied about Newmans involvement. Why is that? This started off as a reasonable exchange of facts but you decided to personalise it with personal innuendos and trying to be a smart arse by naming names. Do you think this would intimidate me. Tell you what if you know so much about me, call round for a chat. Bring your “mates” as we’ll. Go on, if you have the balls.
its amazing that while all this stealing of investors` money was going on at BB the great man of vision was taking Investors money and buying planes for an airline , and paying millions for Allamanda , which is now a derelict eyesore in Hastings .
I wonder if or when it will be revealed that many millions were also stolen in that and the Merricks development?
There has got to be somebody to blame for those two cock ups.
Everything seems to have been run on an “ad hoc” basis.
With the greatest of respect to Garret Fatchet and his colleagues at RL. Mr. Ames has no intention of entering into any rescue plan for purchasers. He is stalling for time. He is fully aware that the SFO will be slow to move in if there is any chance of a potential rescue plan. The Garret Fatchet rescue plan is being used by Ames to delay the inevitable.
Mr. Ames continues to send different messages to different individuals depending on his needs on a particular day.
There is no pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. No secret bank accounts.
Harlequins only real business at the moment is litigation. Ames is now saber rattling with the SFO. Ames stood up in a meeting 4 months ago in Manchester and stated quite forcibly that the SFO were no longer investigating him or his companies. N9w he is threatening to sue the SFO.
The Ames family have destroyed many lives and will destroy many more before this sorry story is over. The Ames family are disdained through out the Caribbean.
Their business is the butt of jokes in the UK. Their loyalty towards their agents and IFA’S can be demonstrated by the actions now pending against these companies.
We can just see Ames pathetic excuse. It wasn’t me gov. Those damn agents miss sold the properties. Me and ummm me wife are so angry at those agents. It was all McDonald’s fault. He was dealing with the agents.
Fascinating stuff this – just like a soap.
Anyway, those of you that REALLY have the transcript can rest easy. Copyright law in the western world allows you to reproduce excerpts for the purpose of review or comment, It’s called fair use or fair dealing. All you have to do is recognise in your excerpt that it is copyright and ideally but not compulsory; attribute it. So let’s see who’s really holding the cards and who is bluffing. Post the excerpt of the transcript you wish to comment on – if you really have it!
Incidentally in England, transcripts are the copyright of the crown and the crown has given blanket permission for their copying or distribution for legitimate purpose. No idea if that is the same in Ireland, there was a law enacted in 2012 which was supposed to make it easy for the public to get court documents but it’s irrelevant anyway as it’s still subject to fair use. Go ahead, publish and be damned.
There you go Ralph, publish the transcripts. If you don’t want to bring it round to my house and we can discuss it over a cup of tea. Oh yes, bring your mates as well.
Yatinkiteasy The blame for the Barbados debacle is being layed at the door step of Procure It Direct and Andy Smith.
And a further embarrasment will shortly be exposed by us. Shona Quomie one of Harlequins witnesses and an individual the judge found very credible indeed was fully aware if not fully involved in a fraud against Harlequin after ICE Group had left. This fraud cost Harlequin or more importantly their investors in excess of USD 4 Million. The simplistic nature of this fraud demonstrates clearly why Ames and his mob need to be removed as quickly as possible.
This fraud was played out directly in front of Ames and his clowns. Demonstrating the disdain to which the Ames family are held.
“Shortly to be exposed by us” yeh yeh yeh. Publish the transcripts. Get on with it. All innuendo and hints. You seem a bit quiet in talking to me now. Why would that be? You will not intimidate me so don’t even think of trying again.
FDNRM you complain about Ralph getting personal with you just because he called you Bob. What about the vile abuse dished out to Erica and her family by your fellow Harlequin supporters. You are a hypocrite and a low life and you deserve everything you get.
@Ralph – Why not call him Whack-a-Ball Bob. Nothing shuts him
up. No matter how persuasive the argument against HD is, he just
comes right back with some inane rationale. The guy truly is
hopeless. I guess in his case – hope springs infernal…
Benefit Bob, your work here is (not) done. You only make things worse for yourself when you get your knickers in a twist.
The only reason you come under fire is because of your relentlessly lame arguments over any negative comments about Harlequin. It was obvious to many (me) that you were a spineless limpet from the start. Now we more or less know it. Even before anything Ralph has posted. You told everyone you were getting payment, and ‘proved’ it to Fatchett. Like I said, Ames owns you.
No one wants to loose money whether sane or otherwise. Many people are looking for a scape goat. Some one or a number of individuals. Mr. Ames will pay people to do almost anything to save his hide.
Garret Ronan is an example of this. He now resides in New York and has tried to erase his public profiles.
The RLB issue back fired on Harlequin as they were not expecting this to be contained in the judgement.
Harlequin are trying to destroy the careers of individuals they accuse of being complicit in one way or another. Take the case of Mr. Newman. Harlequin are seeking to destroy his career prior to his court case. Why do this? Surely it would be better to leave him be, to allow him make money, more for Harlequin if they win the case. TS’s comment with respect to Wilkins Kennedy was infantile to say the least. “They have loads of money”. They also have “loads of money in which to mount a very robust defence” Harlequin on the other hand have little or no funds left.
Carter Ruck and Nabarro no longer act for Harlequin.
Harlequin just do not have the funds to maintain all the legal battles currently being fought on a number of fronts. Ames has made an impationed plea for purchasers to close on properties at Buccament Bay. This against the back drop of advice from UK government agencies telling purchasers to proceed with extreme caution. Shipleys remain silent on the issue, however Shipleys as administrators for HMMSE would have every right to claw back any cash paid over by purchasers for completions.
On the issue of a rescue plan. If you are one of the “lucky” ones to complete on your property at Buccament Bay would you be prepared to share revenue of your unit with a number of other purchasers?
Would you as a future share holder in the rescued Harlequin be willing to share in the risk associated with taking on all the existing litigation. For a rescue plan to work 100% of purchasers would have to buy into the idea.
Failure to get 100% agreement could lead to ongoing litigating for years by a group or groups of disaffected purchasers. If the rescue plan entailed that purchasers became share holders, they would be liable for any losses as well as profits. How many of these share holders would be class A shareholders with voting rights and how many would be class B with no rights? The rescue plan will be a hugely complex plan just to set up. The only land that is owned outright by Harlequin with no issues or skeletons in that closet is Merricks in Barbados and that has huge planning issues, with planning having only been granted for 1/8th of the site and even this planning us subject to strict planning conditions.
David Campion was tasked with devising construction budgets as part of his role as development director for Harlequin but he was not aware of how many units were sold and at what price. Carol Ames the managing director of HMMSE the primary agent for Harlequin did not even know how many units her company had sold. She did not even now how much the units were sold for.
She therefore could not have known whether her company was profitable or not. Yet she signed off the accounts and paid herself and her family a huge dividend every year. The same accounts that were heavily qualified and eventually disclaimed.
Harlequin failed to get their accounts audited in the Caribbean. They claimed in the Irish court that they had filed accounts in the Caribbean but refused to state whether these were audited accounts or management accounts. They refused to produce the accounts in the Irish Case. To date the so called filed accounts are unavailable for viewing.
I simply can’t wait for Benifits Bob’s rebuttal.
Ah well the usual cretins crawl out from under the rocks.
@Anon 8.31, no I did not get annoyed because he called me Bob. “Sorry Bob having worked in the business for the past 20 years the SFO nor any other state investigative agency will not inform the other side as to whom reported what first.” Ralf is a professional stalker who has alluded to a lot more than knowing my first name. Report me to the tax authorities? Now thats personal. Erica on the other hand took photographs of a persons wife and kids. How would you respond to that?
@Anon 8.35 Pointless comment.
@Anon RU. Well of course you would want to chip in. Spineless limpet? No I have a backbone and stand up for myself.
And for every ones information I have not or am I on benefits. See you morons follow like sheep Ralphs accusations and he cannot even get that right. And you believe all the information he is postings.
And Ralf your defense of Newman is pathetic, leave him alone? That is the founder of the Harlecon site who started it while still working for WK and was part of the fraud against HP. You must be joking.
PUT UP THE TRANSCRIPT RALF. or call round for a cup of tea. You must know where I live.
Fdnrm, how can you stand behind a company and a man who has lied and deceived all these years? Selling on land he does not own, selling property that has no planning, borrowing money from purchaser funds for his own gain, paying himself dividends from purchaser money whilst permissions or building were non existent, lied about the marina, does not file accounts, ignores purchasers, stands behind wildly misleading sales promises that are simply lies, buys planes randomly, leaves debts all over caribbean etc etc. All this was pre harlecon. I am afraid your constant defense of these disgraceful business practices is what makes people believe you to be either a little pig headed, not too sharp or connected to harlequin in a way you have not revealed.
From one Anon to another……..BRAVO!
We are supposed to believe that Mr Ames so trusted Mac that he persuaded him not to have a signed contract with a builder for a multimillion dollar project!. If true, no wonder he went bankrupt twice.
I wonder if Mac told him to jump off a cliff , that he would do it.
There must be more to it than this simplistic explanation.
Then again, I love conspiracy stories.
Bob, You are wrong and a liar! I have never took pictures of anyone’s wife or kids. I am nobody’s puppet.
Now leave me alone.
@Erica, How did you get the court transcripts then?
@Erica, yes you could be right about not taking a picture of any ones wife and kids. Its just difficult to tell if there is any body in the picture of the white Audi that you sent to Crozier. Remember that one? Now how did I get a copy of that.
Oh and by the way it wasn’t me who brought you into this, it was 174 (Anon) who decided to bring you back to the intention of the public. Have a word with him about raising your profile again.
36/FDNRM/SPORTINGMAN/BOB
Erica always stuck her head above the parapet and the abuse she took for it was vile, patently so. The abuse predated all the guff about taking pictures of people, which you still seem to be offering as a justification for her treatment. You feel that she got what was coming to her.
You are a revolting passive aggressive low life and you need to develop a moral compass.
Well it did not take long for Jeremy Newman, sorry “Ralph” to show his true malicious colours!
How very Harleconish to resort to petty personal insults and threats. Maybe he will start sending anonymous death threats again?
How very Harleconish to write rambling posts with unsubstantiated claims, veiled threats and personal insults against Dave Ames.
Why the vitriolic reaction if he is not the shamed and defamed Jeremy Newman? Why take it so personally?
I am sure Ralph is an incoherent and inconsistent speaker for a group representing certain interests. They are all named in the judgment between paragraphs 75-77.
Matt Ames has been banned for 13 years for being a company director. We suppose given that the Irish Judgement concludes that Mr. Mac Donald was such a close friend of the Ames family, it was his influence and his influence alone that caused poor Matt boy to be facing trial in a little over two weeks.
Oh yes is this not the same Matt Boy who recently stole some 10 million USD worth of Assets from the Buccament Bay project. Or was that Mr. Ames senior, no of course it was not, it was those pesky accountants again.
Hang on……………….. Stolen assets you say? Yup folks the Ames family have done it again and will push the Country of SVG back into the spotlight.
More on this at a later stage.
TS may wish to comment.
TS sadly for you and Mr. Ames it is Harlequin who have made the transcripts public as will be demonstrated very soon.
It is also sad that you defend Mr. Ames so vigorously and are upset by the personal insults directed at him whilst you apparently condone if not partaking in gratuitous attacks on everyone else.
We are not Mr. Newman, that we promise you. TS. BFP refer to the Apple not Falling Far from the Tree. Surely Barbados Free Press should have stated That The ORANGE does not fall from the tree?
Or is that a sour subject?
If Mr. Newman was to win the defamation case it would mean that the jury and or judge accepted that what Mr. Newman was saying was in all essence the truth. Ie that Mr. Ames and senior members of his team including his in house lawyers were up to their necks in it?
TS will you acknowledge one fact please. That Carol Ames stated she had no idea as the sales made by HMSSE or the Number of units sold. Will you at least confirm that, before the leaked transcripts from Harlequin are made public.
SO NOW WE HAVE THE TRUTH
The copyright for the transcripts is owned by Gwen Malone, who were the stenographers for the whole of the court case. It was agreed by both parties that a stenographer would be present at the court hearing and costs would be shared.
A copy of the transcripts was handed over to two parties O’Callahan solicitors in Cork (I would assume that was the solicitor for O’Halloran) and Harlequin Property. Now I’m sure DA hasnt handed out copies of the transcripts so that would only leave…?
Gwen Malone own the copyright for the transcripts and cannot be published without their permission!
So now we know why “Ralph” is so keen for me to obtain a copy from Mr Ames. He knows that it is now public knowledge that he cannot publish the transcripts, also why Erica backtracked, and therefor is unable to substantiate any of his claims made above relating to the court case.
Nice try “Ralph” to discredit me, the reference to the Copper-Fasten gave it away, the Irish origin and the manic defense of Newman.
Still call in any time for a cup of tea with your “mates”. I’m sure you know my address, if not then I will send it to you. Unless you are in Jordan.
It is too predictable that Jeremy Newman would resort to desperate measures AGAIN when he has no job, is a director of Kelltek Group with Paudie O’Halloran which has no business and will probably lose his house.
Excellent FDNRM. As I said all along they cannot be shared and so yet again we have shown that Jeremy Ralph Newman is full of nothing but more lies and maliciousness.
Ralf as an affectionado of the film the 39 steps can you explain now and tell us all ,What is Project Orange , and did Ames pay the Piper
Don’t know who is lying or not,but I don’t see anything built at Marquis, merricks or dom rep after all these years. Or planning permission. Just debts. Those are enough facts for me to know ames is a conman.
TS We have taken on board all your comments with respect to the transcripts. We have passed on your comments to those who discovered that a website is about to publish them.
This is their response with out editing.
” Dear Sirs, we have been following Barbados Free Press with great interest. There are two words to describe the Ames Family, Simon Terry, Bob and others connected to Harlequin.
” WACK JOBS ” def. Someone or a group of individuals who are crazy and / or have lost their minds and act like damn lunatics. People you should avoid at all costs as they may be a harm to themselves or others.
We say this given that we have copies of emails from Mr. Ames where he has sent the transcripts of the Irish Court hearings to a number of journalists.
Please see attached.
It is these LEAKED transcripts that will appear on a website shortly.
Kindest regards as always. ”
Well well well. Bob could you please furnish us with an address for the Stenographers in Ireland as we would like to forward the emails we have to them.
It’s interesting that Bob knows only two people had the transcript, Apparently Ames and O’Halloran, via solicitors. If true then presumably one of them told him that; I wonder who?
Anyway it’s irrelevant who owns the copyright it is perfectly legal to publish excerpts without permission for “fair use”. Check it out! Come on let’s see what ‘s so damning.
The planning permission at Merricks is well documented.
@ fdnrm and all his other guises
it’s ‘aficionado’ not affectionado
@ TS
One of the old half-truths again. The Town and Country Planning consent for Merricks is for a phase 1 application only. I know, because I have been to the Barbados T&C Planning Department to look at it.
What is not clear is the extent that has consent as drawings are not available for public viewing.
Would you like to share with us how many units the consent is for and to what extent the central facilities (restaurants etc) are included in Phase 1?
Gee Richard are you talking about project Orange. Ouch Carpet and Dirt springs to mind. This was in all essence an attempt by Harlequin to clean up a mess after their legal advisor’s advised them that not to do so would have the consequences of possible dawn raids by the authorities.
These we believe are matters known only to the inner sanctum within Harlequin. This was leaked to us by a current employee.
Will dig out all we have on this.
Jeremy Newman honestly wants us to believe Dave Ames contacts all the journalists himself and does not have people to do that.
What a ridiculous and pointless lie. If you have the transcripts just share them.
Will it be all 31 days? That will be thousands of pages.
George why are you asking me? Ask Harlequin yourself or resume the default of making things up.
TS cmon now. Mr. Ames has sent out this information to purchasers with a drawing clearly showing Harlequin have received planning permission for “PHASE 1” of 8 phases for Merricks. The planning permission for phase 1 as stated in the release to purchasers by Harlequin is subject to a number of conditions. Strangely Harlequin failed to include those conditions in their release.
@SG’sD An empirical analysis (if there is such a thing) would
lead one to believe that permission was granted for Merricks
Show Village and only for Merricks Show Village (with conditions).
At any rate building materials (now disappeared) were imported for
that purpose. It seems like one year ago a frantic effort was being
made to get “something/anything built” to demonstrate progress.
Perhaps David Campion who was in charge and is still in Barbados
could clear things up.
Hi FDNRM, if Ames is the victim in all this and has done no wrong why would you be bothered if the transcripts were made public? Surely they would only show Ames in a better light than he has been perceived in recent months….which would be a good thing wouldn’t it?
Jeremy Newman you are clearly not a member of United 2 Succeed. They have all of the information on there.
Jeremy “Ralph” Newman only needed to show us the attached email that supposedly showed Dave Ames sending the transcripts to prove himself but he obviously cannot fabricate one on the spot.
The fact that there is a forum called United2Succeed is all the evidence you need that HP has been a huge failure. Purchasers shouldn’t have to rally together to help Ames save the business he has abused. What a mess.
TS you appear to speak on matters to do with Harlequin’s litigation from a position of authority, strength and absolute conviction. You appear to be fully in the loop on these matters yet have no opinion what so ever on matters such as planning etc.
Given that you are apparently up to speed on the litigation etc please feel free to give your opinion on project orange. Or your views as to whether the SFO are still investigating Harlequin or the Ames family or indeed Simon Terry Harlequin’s in house lawyer.
And what are you views on the latest news about Matt Ames the current general manager of Buccament Bay.
Sid would you feel that way if Buccament won even more awards?
TS Please understand we will be providing the underlying supporting documentation to back up all of our claims. You can rest easy or otherwise on that score.
Now can you please shed light on PROJECT ORANGE yes TS PROJECT ORANGE. 2009 remember.
Jeremy I know a lot about the case because I followed it and read the judgment. Maybe it was too painful for you to read which I can understand. Merricks is not my investment so I do not pay it much mind.
Now I have answered you can stop trying to divert attention from your inconsistent rambling comments and show us the email from Dave Ames that had the transcripts attached.
All you have to do is copy and paste the email. Why are you so shy all of a sudden?
TS, absolutely. BB could win 1000 awards a week, but after nearly 8 years I have never seen a penny from them despite making a sizable investment and am told by HP not to expect anything for at least the next 2 years. So 10 years with no ROI and you want me to be satisfied with awards? Awards don’t feed my kids TS. Lucky old FDNRM is getting his money which explains his satisfaction, I’m not so am entitled to be pissed off.
Simon sorry TS one would expect that after spending close to 400 million sterling on a few bits of rocky mountain sides and mangrove swamps that Harlequin have purchased through out the Caribbean that 100 or so operational units would win some kind of an award.
They certainly will win no awards for paying staff or local suppliers.
They might win the award for the Caribbean’s Newest most high Profile Loss Making operation. They could also win the Worlds Leading Luxury Hotel Litigation Awards.
Harlequin have spent in excess of 6% of total monies taken from purchasers on legal bills.In both defending actions and taking them.
@Sid, I have not said I would be bothered if the transcripts were published. In fact I have challenged “Ralf” to publish them, but he/they seem a bit reticent. I have no idea what is in them and not seen a copy.
@Whos the worst fraudster, do you read anything at all? Read my post of 9.03, then read it again. Lets see if you can work it out?
@EL2, you really are a stupid person. Now you think that Richard Hanney and I are the same person. Hang on here’s Lord Lucon again, no its me.
@Ralf, try using Google, Type in Gwen Malone, oh hang on a minute, your solicitor friend O’Callahan in Cork will give you the address.
And your web site who are going to publish the transcripts sent you an e-mail which you “quoted” at 11.18. Judging by the content of the e-mail this should be a laugh.
@ Anonymous
The consent is for more than the show village as, for example, there are conditions in it about a lift to the beach and the stability of the cliff-face.
What I find irritating is that Harlequin and its supporters fail to respond with any substance. We know the consent for Merricks is for part of the development. Why keep repeating the old nonsense that permission has been granted for the whole thing?
@ Ralph
I have read the conditions and posted something on BFP a while ago about them. They are the sorts of standard conditions T&CP impose on developments such as agreeing the main drainage design before it is installed – so “reserved matters” issues.
@ TS
I can be accused of many things but “making things up” is not one of them.
Hi Bob. Remember good things come to those who wait. You will get to see the transcripts in good time. TS don’t worry you too will get to see the websites in good time.
Bob can you look at the transcript pertaining to Carol Ames and tell us all what it says whilst we wait for the transcripts to be made public.
See we cant find any reference to the stenographers or Mr. O Halloran’s solicitors in the judgement so we assume you have a copy or have had sight of the transcripts.
Bob we understand that you are angry given that your sole source of income were the payments you received from Harlequin. And that you might have been a special case in Harlequin’s eyes. This is why we question your impartiality.
@Ralph/Jeremy, you really are a stupid person. Let me write this slowly because you obviously need time to think about what I am going to say.
1)Phone the Irish court
2)Find out if a Stenographer was used
3)Ask who it was.
4)Google the Stenographers name (posted in an earlier post or do you want me to repeat it?)
5)Phone the Stenographer and ask some simple questions like “who had a copy of the court transcripts”
Now just to show you again how stupid you are read your post above again. “You will get to see the transcripts in good time” then “Bob? can you you look at the transcripts… etc etc.”
Now make your mind up, do I have a copy or not. I know the answer but obviously you do not.
And Ralph, so do I take it I am now off benefits? Another crock of shit posted earlier then.
@Ralph, wow makes a change from all the normal crap on here, in summary do you think Matt Ames will get a ‘holiday’ and whats the outcome for HP?
Could Ames sell it or would that need investors concent?
@FDNRM
if you can’t take it don’t give it
Bob we are very impressed with the efficiency of the Irish Court staff during this their Summer Holidays. It would have been far easier to ask Dave or Simon.
One question was the money from Harlequin your only source of income? And were you considered a special case by Harlequin.
Will Matt Ames get a holiday? That will be down to the jury. What is very interesting is that the insolvency service announced a 13 year ban on Matt Ames with just over 2 weeks to go to his criminal trial.
It seems fairly cut and dry he took all the money and spent most of it on himself. We suspect given the insolvencies services’s move today that there is a lot more going on behind the scenes.
As for selling the companies, that’s far more complicated we will get back to you on that.
Jeremy Newman you look even more foolish, malicious and full of it now. You will not copy and paste an email because a website is starting? A single email will cheapen everything will it? You clearly do not have the capacity to plan this ruse because you undermine and embarrass yourself every other post.
Good luck with the new website Jeremy. We all know what happened to the last one and where it will get you.
@FDNRM Jeremy Newman is unemployed and spends all day on Twitter when he is not writing nonsense here.
https://twitter.com/jwgn
TS we are not Jeremy Newman.
Let us ask the readers on BFP. Should we do the following?
Should we direct readers and the media to sites which will back up and substantiate our claims.
Should we discuss Project Orange.
Should we direct readers and the media to sites demonstrating that Mr. Ames sent transcripts to media organisations.
Should we direct readers and the media to sites containing the court transcripts.
Or should we allow TS Simon and Bob dictate what should or should not be said about Harlequin.
Anyone with a financial interest in Harlequin should seek independent legal advice and we strongly advise not to take any advice from Mr. Simon Terry and the in house legal team of Harlequin. If Simon Terry or his team produce information to you or your independent solicitors you should advise your solicitors to independently verify the information.
This is very important. Many solicitors will accept the word of another solicitor as they will expect the other solicitor to uphold the ethics of his profession.
In the case of Harlequin and Mr. Terry there is persuasive evidence to demonstrate that ethics play a small part in their actions.
@Ralph/Jeremy I cannot speak for TS but try all of the above and see where you get. I do not try and dictate anything, only what is said is factual and can be substantiated. So try away and print/direct/ whatever you wish.
Ralph thanks for that,
I suspect Ames will be looking for a deal that will not involve the best interest of investors, just covering his little short arse.
The stat demands won’t go away, and i think that will be the stumbling block
for any finance deal. ……..
If there is ever going to be any finance – i doubt it as we have been told so many times
FDNRM – you have antagonised and stirred behind a veil of anonymity on this site for too long.
You clearly think that we have no factual information so how about we kill 2 birds with 1 stone?
FDNRM is a 64 year old man by the name of Bob Storey who lives in Nuneaton, he bought cabana 34 for £150k in 2006?
Bob – have I got facts or am I just a bluffer?
Bob was Harlequin your only source of income and were you a special case?
Wow… This is now getting interesting!
@Ralph… Re your post 2.18pm… Yes,yes,yes,yes & NO!
Thank you.
@Ralph at 2:18: Go for it. (The vision of Bob on his Loo with ipad – steaming with obvious indignation at your involvement has provided me with a real chuckle). Long time coming!
Ralph The initials certainly are appropriate….BS
Proof if needed that Jeremy Newman is a nasty piece of work. My name is not Simon by the way so your psychic powers have apparently abandoned you.
T&CP has granted full planning permission with usual conditions for Merricks Phase 1 which is the largest of seven phases – comprises entrance roads, parking, beach access, elevator, 162 studios and 1, 2 and 3 bed apartments in 3 storey blocks, 5 duplex and single cabanas, beach complex including restaurant, bar and pool, village/market place pedestrian boulevard, back of house facilities including storage, kitchens, laundry, garbage disposal, sewage disposal, water storage, workshops etc. 250,000 sq. ft. of building area
Last week The Insolvency Service named and shamed Matthew Ames and banned him from being a director for the next 13 years. Rather condemnatory information now in the public domain and most inconvenient for poor Matt what with his fraud trial coming up and all.
A quick look on InCourts Daily http://incourts.co.uk/ and a search for MATTHEW AMES and what do I find?
MATTHEW AMES London
21/02/2013 Thu, Plea and Case Management – Case Started – 11:43 at Court: 13
21/02/2013 Thu, Plea and Case Management – Hearing finished for MATTHEW AMES – 12:12 at Court: 13
21/02/2013 Thu, Plea and Case Management – Case to be listed for Further Mention/PAD on 26-Jul-2013 – 12:13 at Court: 13
09/08/2013 Fri, For Application to Break Fixture – Case Started – 14:07 at Court: 16
Now why would they want to postpone/adjourn? Run out of money? Not in the country? Has someone advised him to plead guilty?
It looks like Bob did a jack-knife on the loo. Classic case of
sewer-cide.
http://goo.gl/maps/KUTuC
@TS… yeah.. so what, its a house?
Simon we like the name Simon.
So Simon it shall be. Or maybe we might call you Carol. Simon is better.
That is my house. I am all for sharing.
Do you like my house Ralph?
It’s Jeremy Newman’s house
I think you meant Ralph.
They’re really going at each other now: Ralph unmasks FDNRM as Bob Storey, a 64 year old loser from Nuneaton and TS posts a picture of a a house, presumably Newman’s or someone connected to him.
Thanks, Ralph – things are really getting interesting.
p.s. – your move!
Bob Storey – have you nothing to add?!
He’s wedged in the loo !
@TS… My question is….. Do I really care who’s house it is?
Simple answer… NO!
What I care about is WTF has happened to my money that I gave to Ames for a so called investment???
Ralph has made a refreshing change to the S#ite that FDNRM has been spouting on this blog.
Bob is on shift at McDonald’s now , so he can’t use his iPad .
Nice house Simon pity Ames won’t be getting his hands on it to pay back
What he owes……. Did Ames the younger cop a plea then????
Erika I was not talking to you and stop lying about being an investor.
@Ralph, Jeremy Newman, interested in WW11 and fraud.
Home address:5 Hasting Close, Bray, Maidenhead, SL6 2DA
Martin Macdonald, Ex accountant Wilkins Kennedy
Home address: 202 Thorpe Hall Avenue, Thorpe Bay, Southend on Sea, Essex, SS1 3SE
So lets understand how you have your information.
When the SFO came to see me they has placed a Section 2 on Wilkins Kennedy and retrieved all the accountants information. That MacDonald was your information which included the Cabanna change from 23 to 34. That happened in 2009 when you were still employed by WK.
So we all know who “Ralf” is, or are, Newman and MacDonald.
So Ralf lets hope your “outing” does not lead to anything more unpleasant like Erica photographing my car. Everything is traceable these days.
So when are you going to post your transcripts?
Love the M3 Simon must have set you back hmmmm 50K or so? Yes / no ? Nice Mini too. Heh do you have one of those electric car thingy’s.
Reminds me of something funny we saw.
Q. This is the Captain of the Good Ship Harlequin. The largest and best ship in the world. You will divert your course 15 degrees to the west.
A. No mate you divert your course 15 degrees to the East.
Q. Again my name is Captain Ameless and you will divert 15 degrees to the west.
A. Again mate you divert your course 15 degrees to the East.
Q. I will not tell you again. I am Captain Ameless no one disobeys me.You will alter course 15 degrees to the west or I will be forced to order my chief Simple Simon to fire a salvo of C Ruck missiles at you. In addition to this my chief Simple Simon will be ordered to fire a whole host of google earth photos at you.
A. Ok so crack on. We are a light house.
A. Hello Hello …………. Are you there over?
WTF is baaaaaaaaack… He was absolutely consumed with the fact
that Erica was not an investor (even though her husband is – hasn’t
he ever heard of community property?)
And Jeremy Newman just became even more nonsensical. He is not even trying to avoid sounding like Harlecon now.
Desperation does funny things.
“what a vile species we can be.”
How right you are Jeremy.
TS it ain’t our house. Anyone know whos house this is? Google maps can be a tad unreliable. TS why don’t you go over and take a photo of the right house.
Sorry for the technical glitch. Our language is
back to normal. The language masking software cocked up.
Ahh hmmm Bob, don’t take this the wrong way mate but surely if you were interviewed by the SFO they would have asked you to keep it quiet. We could be wrong. Not sure they told you about the section 2 though. Maybe they did tell you. Maybe they wanted you to tell the whole world. Who knows, who cares, you said Ameless is going to sue them anyway. Have you any photos of the SFO offices to put up on line?
@TS… So you think I’m Erica?
Just goes to show you are full of s#it like FDNRM.
When you post on here Tw#thead, you talk to everyone!
Why don’t you confirm it with your buddy, he knows I’m not Erica….
And why keep bringing her into it anyway???
We would like to apologise to Mr. Newman and his family and Mr. MacDonald and his family. We are neither individual. We are a plural to begin with. TS Simon or whatever and Bob Storey FDNRM are true examples of how people get things so wrong.
It appears that these two individuals will try intimidating the wrong people in order to stop us from Highlighting issues to anyone with an interest in Harlequin.
Resorting to posting photos of houses of individuals wholly unconnected to this debacle.
People are loosing the run of themselves here. But sorry guys we cant stop these 2 wackjobs.
@Ralph/Jeremy/MacDonald. How odd that you should show Erica as a business connection on your business page. Did she iron your shirts. You really don’t know how a Section 2 works do you. All HP files were handed over which included investor information. You Martin, had access to that information which included at that point the new Cabanna number. Funny how in one of your original posts you asked what property I had and how much I paid for it. Now you seem to know. Decided to interigate your files a bit better did you? Oh and I’m not your mate either. Got that
@Ralph, well you can always come out then.
@Conned, didn’t take long for the t**t language to come back out. Have you got ADHD?
Bob (FDNRM):: Back to your normal childish responses. At 64 you would think you would know better but then again there’s no fool like an old fool (and you certainly take the biscuit)!
No Bob your not a mate your a complete wackjob. LOL.
Bob (36 et al) should be enshrined i n Madame Tussaud’s
House of Wacks
@Anonymous: Right on. Sitting on a thunder box, an ipad on lap with smoking keys – and a manic look on his face.
@Newman/MacDonald Wackjob, another word from your internet hosting company, another made up bunch of people.
Bobbie for God’s sakes open the box of wine. Its getting time
and your last post made no sense …relax !!!
Mr Storey – it’s over, you have been unmasked. A sad 64 year old loser who gets his kicks trolling on the Internet and bullying women with your equally pathetic HP brothers in arms. Try and get a few more shifts at B&Q and move on. You haven’t the intellect to contribute anything meaningful to the debate and now that your cover has been blown you come across more so than ever as a ridiculous and risible figure.
@anon 6.53 believe me bigots like you will not make the slightest difference. “Anonymous” sums up your value to this debate.
I hoped that Ralph would be a breathe of fresh air offering new angles and intelligent debate. Alas, it seems that he is no better than the rest, resorting to childish insults when he runs out of things to say. Such a shame because it was looking quite good for a while.
Interesting article, for those interested in fact not fiction, in IFA online. SFO have charged 4 people in a bio fuel fraud, including an IFA who advised investors to invest through a SIPP. Cannot post the link but interesting development.
Yes Bob, but the three other people charged, who were the ones who set up the scam were not IFAs. Why would you focus on the fact that one was an IFA when the other three were not?
And it was alleged that they had been actually fraudulent — this really isn’t comparing the same thing at all.
@ Merricks Planning
At last a few more facts and a little more clarity, thank you.
So 162 + 5 = 167 units (plus central facilities etc).
Do you know what the total number of units planned is?
@anon 8.40
Because I wanted to.
@Bob.FDNRM.36.etc.etc – This is one Anon who truly apologizes.
Little did I realize that you were simply a somewhat eccentric yet
lovable cabana owner whose joy in life is “believing what he wants to”
It is almost tantric….
@ so pathetic. I agree name calling and insults are pretty tasteless. However, I am not sure what fresh angles there are to discuss other than how to get your money out. Ames took the money, paid himself and ifa’s, did not own land for some of his sales, did not have planning permission for most. He built 2 per cent of what was sold. The money has gone, he is rich, purchasers have nothing. What other angle can there be, or fresh insight? He ripped everyone off, there is simply no other angle, the facts are what they are. He has not delivered. If you have not made your move already, I suspect you will have lost everything.
The issue of Ames selling his companies.
Our take on it is yes he could, however its not that simple. According to the Irish transcripts Harlequin has sold circa 6000 properties to some 5000 purchasers.
Harlequin have only 120 units currently available to hand over. Leaving 5,880 to be completed or more importantly constructed.
This means that there are close to 5880 purchaser contracts many which have passed there contract due dates.
Most if not all the remaining contracts will fall due in the next 24 months.
This will then give a liability to the companies of some 400 million sterling. If every one of the 5880 purchasers were to call in their debts. In addition many if not all of the contracts have a compensation clause of 10 % if the contract deadlines have been missed. Adding a further 40 million liability to the debt burden.
In addition you have on going litigation which one way or the other will have to be settled. The current estimate of litigation costs are in the region of 15 million. This will increase as time goes by.
So the liabilities are in the region of 455 million. Now we have to offset this against the value of the assets.
1. Merricks the value of this land in today’s market is about 7 million stg. The market is depressed in Barbados. Despite the need for investment in new hotel stock, there is nervousness in the Barbados market.
2. Development costs for the Merricks resort stand at approx 160 million. Circa 1000 units have been sold here.
3. Planning granted for only 1/5 of the project.
4. Marquis Estate St. Lucia. Currently no planning permission granted. In addition some of the land originally acquired was subject of a contract where if Harlequin had not completed sections of the work the land would revert back to the ownership of the original land owners and Harlequin would loose any money paid. Those deadlines have now passed. Current value of land circa 4 million sterling.
5. The Marquis Estate costs will be three times that of Barbados given the topographic nature of the location and the inclusion by Harlequin of a 6 star Hotel and World class golf course. Close to 2000 units have been sold here. 480 million development costs.
6. The Dominican Republic, The lands here are an issue. Most of the land at Las Canas originally earmarked for development was deemed unfit for use by Environmental officials. The Land at The Two Rivers site also has similar issues.
7.A small potion of the Las Canas land known as the Hideaway has however now planning permission. Development cost here circa 20 million.
8. Land values have dropped since the original lands were purchased given the environmental issues with Two Rivers and Las Canas. There are also a raft of other outstanding legal issues pertaining to the lands in the Dominican Republic. Land value in event of a sale based on current rates max 10 million.
9. Total development costs for the Dominican Republic 290 million sterling.
Additional land will however have to be purchased to allow for the build of all properties sold.
10. Buccament Bay circa 30 acres are owned by either Ames or Harlequin. However Harlequin have sold property on a further 45 acres which is not owned by them. Including units in the Pat Cash hotel. Whilst Harlequin will claim they gave binding agreements to purchase this land that us not the case. Harlequins proposals to purchase this land was by way of a mortgage.
To date Harlequin claimed to have spent close to 90 million developing the resort. Currently 110 units are available however some of these units are used as restaraunts gyms, reception etc. A further 50 apartments currently occupied by staff could technically be made available relatively quickly. There are another 89 units at various stages of completion, however little or no work has been undertaken on these units in the past 2.5 years. And they have fallen into disrepair.
Circa 1100 units have been sold at Buccament Bay. 851 additional units gave to be built from scratch. A further 260 million will have to be spent on developing this resort.
The true value of the Buccament Bay site as it stands is very hard to ascertain. The values attributed by Harlequin to this site are wholly unrealistic however. The resort has yet to turn a profit despite being operational for 3 years. In addition it owes HMMSE in excess of 25 million. A liquidator would be lucky to see a return of between 20 and 30 million for this site.
Therefore it might be possible to get a return of circa 60 million for all the assets.
We have not included the hotel Blu and the boutique hotel in Barbados. We will attribute a nominal 7 million for both these sites.
So a total of 67 million might be realisable from the assets. Liquidators costs will be circa 25%. Leaving 50 million.
Total development costs will be circa 1.25 billion
If all contracts remain as are. Ie nothing else to pay until completion I doubt any purchaser would look at buying the group.
The total amount realisable from 70% completions would be 900 million.
Any purchaser would need to invest 25% more then they could recoup from the 70% completions. In addition any purchaser would have to set aside a contingency of 266 million to cover the guranteed returns as per purchaser contracts.
The problem for Harlequin is given that the 400 million spent to date is only returning a real asset value of 67 million. Partly because circa 200 million has been paid in commissions. Most purchasers or financiers would shy away.
The bigger problem is that coupled with the large commissions this has had the affect that Harlequin have sold the units at 25% below the cost to complete.
So few if any financiers or purchasers would be willing to invest.
Bloody hell Ralph where have you been, how cab I contact you?
@ Conned – Er wrecker….. is a vile vindictive woman with mental heath problems – shame for you she is your mother.
@WTF – There you go again. Just what is you vicious
obsession with Erica?
No comment from the Harlequin trolls on the facts in Ralph’s analysis, just another vicious attack on a woman who stood up to Harlequin.
Rescue Package.
A rescue package could be mounted however.
1. Ames and his family would have to walk away.
2. Agreement by all purchasers to become shareholders
3. All non purchaser creditors settled. ( unknown say 12 million)
4. All litigation settled ( circa 15 million)
5. All assets with the exception of Buccament Bay sold. (This could raise circa 37 million)
6. Build additional 300 units at Buccament Bay. (Anymore would saturate the site)
Cost for this with infrastructure circa 48 million.
7. 38 million would have to be raised by purchasers. (7600 per person)
8. Set a target profit of 100 per night per room net of all taxes.
9.This would give a yearly average return of 3000 per purchaser. Of course this would have to be pro rated as per purchasers investment. This is based on 60% occupancy.
The draw backs.
1. Getting Ames to walk.
2. Selling all the other assets in a timely manner ( other wise raise an additional 7400 per person)
3.Settling all litigation ( Given the animosity created by the current litigation)
4. Getting all purchasers to agree.
5. The airlift issue to Buccament Bay remains.
6. Selecting a proper Project Management Team. Argo under Campion is most definitely not an option.
7. Do not select a construction team from the ranks of purchasers. This will lead to forums like this springing up with allegations of all sorts arising.
8. Shareholders share in profits as well as losses.
9. 2-3 years to complete and see a return.
10. The Ames family control of the chess board with respect to Shipleys and HMSSE
This basic rescue plan could see an avg annual return of between 2 and 5-6 % per year. Would of course be a better option then liquidation.
.
As per BFP (3.27) earlier. Consent is for three storey apartment blocks. That is smaller than the original plan ( 4 floors )
and what Ames needed to make this even marginally viable ( 5 floors). It’s also lower than is shown on the resort CGI’s still on the Harlequin Property website
So what was going to generate a loss will now generate a whopping loss. And there are eight phases- so to build out will take a decade or so at a guess.
We also know that the site as originally planned was going to struggle with back of house plus all the accommodation. Now that the height of the apartment blocks has been reduced the total number of units will have to be scaled back. Logically that means that Ames knows there must be refunds made, but we guarantee he has not notified the purchasers who are affected.
Our mission is to demonstrate to purchasers the facts as they pertain. And not the sanitised version presented by Ames and his die hard supporters. We seek solutions for purchasers and a jail cell for Ames his wife family and in house legal team.
This rescue plan cannot work. Buccament bay will lose millions annually as a 500 room resort. Liquidation is the best way to get money out am afraid, although the values stated above are high, you would not raise that much from selling the assets off. Blue is worth $4m tops, about 2.5m sterling. Marquis is worth $4m too. Allamanda may be worth what you suggest. Buccament bay not worth anywhere close to what you are saying unless you are including the sold units. Not likely to get 7m sterling for merricks – greenfield site in not good location in a market where there are existing hotels for sale at good prices in the region and real estate sales poor. Dom rep, also won’t get 10m. Lots of good land there, better than these sites. Ames invested very badly. However, hope you succeed in your goals ralph, conmen belong in prison.
I’d have to agree with Anonymous August 15, 2013 at 2:42 am. Not because of the arithmetic; it’s the principle of getting 100% of purchasers to give up any right of ownership of a cabana or whatever, in exchange for shares in a company that owns the properties. I suspect that a large majority bought into the dream of owning their own place in the Caribbean not shares in a Caribbean company. I suspect many, if not most would want out, placing a much bigger burden of funding (i.e. buying out out those that wanted out), on those that might agree to stay in. It’s a beautiful idea but human nature will almost certainly get in the way. It’s worth a try I suppose but I wouldn’t back this particular horse to win. Just another opinion though.
No Ralph, your “mission” is to get the upcoming court case dropped against you. Funny how you refer back to the Irish transcripts again isn’t it Jeremy and Martin. “settle all litigation” so very obvious.
@SDG some of us go to bed at night and don’t give answers to order.
How on earth are Jeremy Newman and Martin MacDonald accountants with such shocking maths?
Litigation could only cost £15,000,000 if it is the equivalent of 10 OJ Simpson trials.
Pathetic.
As soon as I made reference to Jeremy “Ralph” Newman’s Twitter account he locked it down.
What a shocking coincidence! Almost as if he is here eh Ralph?
Ralph is so eager to help that he will not provide contact details.
Why could he want to keep his identity secret?
Rhetorical question of course. It is obviously Jeremy Newman.
Ralph – as Anon at 2.42am pointed out BB at 500 rooms will not work. There is no evidence of any kind to support the notion that there is any demand for a hotel of that size in the area – probably not in the entire Caribbean islands. The size of the development has been a flaw from the very beginning and gives credence to the claim that this was a scam from the start. It’s the wrong product in the wrong place, a resort of that size would put a massive strain on the already overloaded Vinlec capacity and even if there was a demonstrable demand, the tourism infrastructure is nowhere near advanced enough to support that kind of development – and before Ole King Troll Bob’s yer Uncle starts on about the airport again – just because there is an airport does not mean that a mega resort is justified. That’s the old “build it and they will come” stupidity writ large. Whilst on the subject of the airport – take a look at the Friends of Argyle FB page, does that look like an airport about ready to receive traffic in the near future? Best guesses are that it might just about be ready for 2015 – just in time to boost the government’s standing in the general election.
Harlequin is currently embroiled in over 30 separate litigation matters. Some involving purchasers, some involving creditors, some involving the Ames family as in the defamation case.
But your comment on the defamation issue could be a clear indicator of one of the many issues and hurdles which would need to be overcome before a rescue plan could be considered.
The defamation case is primarily concerned with the alleged defamation of the Ames family. If a rescue plan was successful in having the Ames’s removed then why should purchasers continue with that action.
If purchasers cannot reach agreement on settling matters such as litigation then a rescue plan will have little or no success. Settling litigation does not necessarily mean throwing in the towel. Much of the litigation in which Harlequin is embroiled is filled with animosity. These forums are clear indicators of the levels of animosity that exist.
But to allow the rescue plan even the slightest chance of success, shareholders will have to agree on a huge range of issues including how to settle ALL matters currently being litigated.
The rescue plan mooted by RL is predicated on the fact that the Ames family needs to be removed from the equation without any additional cost to the purchasers. Even the RL rescue plan demonstrates a total lack of confidence in the Ames family ability to successfully steer the business out of troubled waters.
The Ames’s are still plaintiffs in the defamation action and could most certainly continue with the litigation.
Some appear to want to call the result of the defamation case prematurely. This is one case that cant be called. Why can we not wait for the action.
TS would you be willing to hazard a guess at the costs of the Irish Case for example. It will be interesting to see what those costs end up being.
TS FDNRM do you have any comment on the viability of the resorts as being debated on this forum. Your thoughts on this matter would be most welcome.
As this sordid affair heads towards a predictably nasty conclusion it’s useful to remind ourselves just who and what drove it in the first place. The whole business plan was predicated on overselling massively into a market that could not sustain it (and at a time when that market was contracting), setting it up in such a way that bullied the nations involved into declining almost any tax income, making sure that as little as possible was spent to benefit the nations involved – it was greed pure and simple and the participants, especially the leaders but also some of the investors, are as nasty a bunch of exploitative I’m all right Jack’s as you come across. The islands need sustainable development with low leakage rates, not these absurd neo-colonialists conmen.
Now that it is all heading towards collapse it is interesting to note that many investors in the UK seem to think that it is the job of the UK taxpayer to compensate or feather bed them now their self interest has lead them to financial difficulties – the true skivers and shirkers.
@”Ralph” Newman, you lost the chance to enter into serious debate yesterday afternoon. Your attempts at bullying and intimidation lost you any chance of credibility. Some will obviously fall for your “we are the good guys” routine. This is exactly the attempt you made before the Irish case and did not work. You are suddenly interested in my opinion? I think not Jeremy. You “mate” are in for a big financial loss and you are panicking now. When are you going to publish the transcripts O’Halloran gave you?
BB Watch sadly for all concerned the Harlequin companies have collapsed. They have been trading insolvently for a very long time now.
Many purchasers might not understand the reasons behind Harlequin’s appointment of Shipleys and what a CVA does. A CVA in the case of Harlequin allows the Ames family reduce their companies debts. The Ames family will not loose but the creditors will. Its immoral but not illegal.
Its now incumbent on Shipleys to see through this and do the best they can to protect those creditors not part of the Harlequin group.
This forum demonstrates that a rescue plan is now looking less likely by the minute.
We would like to know what TS and FDNRM’s take on the SFO investigation is. Is it now to be accepted by all that the defamation case is over.
To satisfy some on this forum we are quite happy to accept their views on the defamation case. We hope this concession on our part will allow reasonable debate on the important matters which affect purchasers within the Harlequin Group of Companies.
Whilst we are not Mr. Newman, Mr. Mac Donald or Wilkins Kennedy nor do we represent them we are quite happy to accept that for the purposes of this debate the issue of the defamation case is over. If Harlequin and or their supporters want to claim victory, thats fine we will not argue with them on that issue. There are far more important issues to discuss.
@”Ralph” Newman, It just goes to show how desperate you are becoming. The case against you is over? Is it hell. Concession? WOW arrogant doesn’t describe you now. So now is the chance to unmask yourself. Any takers on it will not happen.
Jeremy clearly had too much to drink last night as he has forgotten how vile he behaved yesterday.
Answer questions before asking them Newman. When can the people you want to help receive your contact details?
Or was your plan to help by trolling FDNRM on an obscure blog?
Jeremy Newman is the Batman of this age! Just without the money. Or the secret identity. Or morality.
Hi Ralph, when you talk about the need to settle all litigation are you including the stat demands in this or is that another chunk of cash that will need to be found?
@SGD – total 988 units
@Ralph – there are 5 storey blocks as well as 3 storey blocks but not in phase one
Jeremy, you have locked your twitter account. Why is that then? All those references to WW11 societies a bit embarrassing? Games up.
Hey Jeremy your house is worth over £500k then. Will you be using that for your legal fees? Mind you your mates house, Martin, is a bit shabby, only worth about £350.k Guess he will not have any loot to help you out there.
Posted the transcripts yet? How about finding some obscure hosting company in California/Singapore? But you have been down that route haven’t you.
I’m not sure where all this is going?
Who cares if it’s Bob, Simon, Jeremy, Erica or anybody else… I sure as hell don’t.
What we do need to do is concentrate on the issue at hand, which is, let me remind you all, trying to work out a way in which to get the maximum we can back from the lying, cheating, little toad Ames.
He is the one who has stolen our monies and dreams. He is the one who has put people into financial hardship. Him and his family are the ones that have defrauded us…. NO ONE ELSE!
Passing the blame to anybody else is pointless and futile… Its the Ames’s that have F#CKED US ALL!!!!!
@Jeremy.
Strange how FDNRM because you seem to have more information than anyone else on Hardlycon.
I read with interest your rescue plan, you make no mention of the SIPP investors suing the IFA or the FCS compensation scheme – why is that?
They do have teeth
http://www.ifaonline.co.uk/ifaonline/news/2288919/ifa-among-four-charged-over-gbp23m-biofuel-fraud
@Le Grand etc. Not sure if you directed that at me or Jeremy, but some time ago I goggled Harlecon. Guess what, after about 6 pages it gave me information on server location, IP addresses, web hosting address. and silly Jeremy thought he could hid his identity. Silly boy. Still when he was found out he was exposed and was kicked out of Wilkins Kennedy.
Bob – what’s your take on the rescue plan? Do you still think that the best way out of this mess would be for Dave Ames and family to remain at the helm?
That’s a silly question Anon. FDNRM can only answer in the positive. No offence FDNRM, but you would be foolish to say anything negative as it could jeopardise your payments.
@Sid, I quite liked some of your comments in the past, quite fair I thought, but that is a bit stupid. What rescue plan would that be? Ralphs? with the comments “about” and “around” and the end to all litigation which would include “Ralph” Newman’s. Get real Sid. You disappoint me.
Bob – other than the vile Harlequin trolls Sid has been the only person on this to have given you the time of day. I think you owe him an apology.
I thought I was being fair FDNRM. And I was only asking Ralph to clarify one of the points he made, not agreeing with him. I actual empathise with the position you are in and genuinely believe that you are a true investor. If Ralph is to be believed we have both invested very similar amounts, the only difference being you get a return and I get the big shaft. The point I was making is that if I were you I wouldn’t risk rocking the boat or the gravy could spill! Did I just make that phrase up btw? I think I did and I quite like it 🙂
@Sid, yes sorry I did not mean to react the way I did. Its a bit difficult telling what is malicious crap and a genuine comment. Sorry
No offence taken. And it did allow me to coin the gravy boat phrase!
Lots of vitriol and no small amount of entertainment since our friend Ralph has entered the fray but nothing much to change the basic fundamentals, which have remained strikingly constant over a period of several years. As BBwatch has consistently and eloquently explained to anyone with a mind to listen, this was a badly conceived, naively supported and staggeringly mismanaged undertaking from the outset. The fact that people still speak of a “rescue plan” is testimony to the willing suspension of disbelief (or perhaps more accurately cognitive estrangement) which has characterised this project from the word go.
So where do we go from here? I have for some time felt that the best possible outcome for creditors/purchasers/investors would be liquidation sooner rather than later with any returns augmented by the possibility of damages from a number of sources. I am also convinced that we have not heard the last of the SFO on this one and it is interesting to note that the arrest yesterday of four persons connected with the biofuel firm Sustainable Agroenergy Plc, a much smaller and less convoluted operation in comparison to Harlequin, followed an SFO investigation which commenced 21 months ago in November 2011.
@Kroll… at last… a realist!
Hi Kroll, good point well made. Do we know when exactly the SFO HP investigation started?
http://www.sfo.gov.uk/our-work/our-cases/case-progress/harlequin-property.aspx
That was posted 5/3/2013 so the case was probably opened in January/February 2013. Can’t find anything that pins it down closer than that – but still a long way to go I would expect. Bear in mind how long it has taken to get Matt Ames to court (he’s trying to get dates changed too) and that by comparison seems a much simpler case.
@ Sid
The statement on the SFO’s website about the Harlequin investigation is dated 5th March 2013. 21 months from then is December 2014.
I can hardly wait.
Do you think Matt will end up with a custodial sentence?
I hope so!
The SFO were asked on more than one occasion by Newman, dating back to I believe 2009 to investigate and at that stage declined. The pre investigation was started around Christmas time of this year but I cannot be sure of that date.
Thanks for the answers folks. Looking at it realistically, if a much smaller and apparently far less complex investigation took 21 months, how long could HP take?!
Le Grand architecte, des Caraibes.
You asked why we had not mentioned the SIPP investors suing the IFA’s or receiving compensation from the FCS. We assume the reasoning behind this is that any resultant payout from this action could be ploughed back into Harlequin.
Anyone considering going down this route must understand that they will be fore going any rights or claims they have against Harlequin.
If you used your SIPP to pay the 30% deposit and you decide to make a claim against an IFA or the FCA and you are sucessfull, you will be required to surrender your rights and contract to the insurance company paying out the compensation.
The insurance company will then pursue Harlequin in order to recover the monies paid to you in compensation.
For example if 25 % of purchasers (SIPP holders) were to go down the road of seeking compensation via litigation against the IFA’S or the FCA. The insurers would then pursue Harlequin or the new entity (rescue plan) for circa 100 million. Ie 25% of the deposits taken.
The money recovered by the SIPP purchasers would be returned to the individuals SIPPs. The pension trustees or their insurers would not allow this recovered money to be reinvested back into Harlequin or any rescued version given all the government warnings etc on the issue.
This is why a rescue plan would need 100 % purchaser support.
We accept what other contributors have said on the issue and agree that a rescue plan whilst hypothetically could work, it will in reality fail, taking on board the above and the very good reasons put forward by the other contributors.
We were asked if we had included the Stat Demands in our synopsis. We have not. A rescue plan in our view has no chance with out 100% support. In order to achieve this all stat demands would have to be rescinded.
Our reference to the litigation was in respect of all litigation. Most lawyer’s will advise their clients that civil litigation is a 50 / 50 gamble. In the event that a rescue plan was considered the best option the share holders have every right to continue with the litigation. Some the current litigation involves counter claims by the other parties amounting to 10’s of millions of dollars.
Any shareholders of any rescued company would have to engage legal teams to in one way or another deal with the outstanding litigation. A cost to be borne ultimately by any prospective share holders.
I owe Mr MacDonald an apology, it’s not his house its his mothers.
Questions????
How does the UK force companies registered in SVG-GBI-DR etc.
into liquidation?
When the inevitable happens could DA spend time in a Vincentian
jail? After all he is a citizen and early on in these treads perpetrated
some rather ghastly crimes economic on Vincentians allegedly.
Are any companies actually registered in BGI?
What are the liabilities in DR with its rather unique justice code
derived from conquistadors, Borbons, and SPQR?
Are any taxes being paid on the Allamanda?
This surely is a tangled web.
Just wondering……
Bob is what you’re doing to Mr McDonald similar to what you
have had one major hissy-fit accusing Erica of doing. You really
are a pathetic little man.
No Anon, you are so wrong. Newman/MacDonald started this yesterday, threatening to go to the tax man, publishing financial details. Trying to be so cleaver in going public. For your information I’m over 6 ft and 15 stone, not little. How about you Anon publishing your details full name etc. no? Well that’s being pathetic.
Well excuuuuuuuse!!! me. You are a pathetic big man.
Silly silly comment. You want your name, address, financial details published? You are the pathetic person for hiding behind the ID of Anonymous. You think that ‘Ralph” Newmanwas was right in doing that. They started this and have now opened a can of worms for themselves. Your reasoning is rubbish.
It is wholly incorrect of FDNRM to make a statement that a report was made to The SFO in 2009 but was declined. The SFO has not, does not and will not make public or discuss with any other witness potential complaints made to them. Especially if they decide not to act on the information.
The confidentiality and protection of potential witnesses is covered off in detail on the SFO website.
However to possibly answer the questions posed by many on this forum. FDNRM has alluded to the fact that he is fully aware of information passed by both Mr. Newman and Mr. MacDonald/Wilkins Kennedy to the SFO.
There are a few possible reasons for this.
1. The SFO are keeping FDNRM updated on case progress and are giving him details of witnesses and the information which they are receiving. Unlikely given the above.
2. There is a leak in the SFO. Not the first time that those associated with Harlequin claimed that they were being provided information by the Authorites. James of 11 Capital stated that a gentleman he had previously worked with and who now is a senior employee within A UK government authority confirmed to him that Harlequin were not being investigated by the SFO.
3. Mr. Ames himself confirmed at a purchaser meeting in May near Manchester that the SFO were not furthering their investigation into him or his companies.
4. When cases are coming close to a prosecution, the prosecution is obliged to pass on information to the defence in order to allow them to mount a defence. This could be where FDNRM is obtaining his information.
It appears that given that FDNRM apparently knows much about the ongoing investigation by the SFO maybe he csn answer the question.
However given the 4 points above and the fact that FDNRM claims to be getting information from the SFO we have asked a number of journalistic colleagues of ours to now raise the very serious issue of witness confidentiality given the assertions made by FDNRM. If FDNRM can uphold his claims this has massive ramifications for ongoing and future cases and witness participation.
Or could it be misconstrued as witness intimidation.
Unless and until the statutory demands and linked litigation goes, no rescue.
That fact cannot be changed.
Why not ask RL to confirm how many demands they have in play ?
Then ask how many have been removed .
Unless their clients are paid off, no deal.
FDNRM as previously stated we are not either Mr. Newman nor Mr. MacDonald. You have engaged in massive defamation of these two gentlemen and may well indeed be engaging in some form of witness intimidation.
Despite the fact that you have absolutely no proof that Mr. Newman or Mr. MacDonald are the authors of the blogs currently being produced by Ralph, both you and TS, in the case of TS, publishing a photo of a house obtained from google earth claiming it to be the property of Mr. Newman, when in actual fact it is owned by someone wholly unconnected with Harlequin, Newman, MacDonald or anyone connected to this debacle. Then you apologise to Mr. MacDonald because you referred to a property you claimed belonged to him but now acknowledge belongs to a family member again wholly unconnected to this debacle.
Oh dear Jeremy, we really are clutching at straws now. I said “I believe” the date was 2009. I also have not said I have details of any information passed to the SFO. So now we have had two lies. Lets continue. Items 1-4 are pure fantisy, just like most of your previous posts. Yes ask your journalistic colleagues, Jon Austin for instance, how the SFO got my details from Wilkins Kennendy after serving them with a section 2. What led them to Wilkins Kennedy to serve that order? Who at Wilkins Kennedy had access to the HP files including investor names, addresses, amount paid over? Let me guess, JEREMY NEWMAN.
By the way my car tax is up soon, do you want to tell the DVLA?
Could take years as have to deal with Caribbean outfits. Civil suits could be brought directly against Ames in meantime. He structured a lie to defraud you, there is enough evdidence of that already.
Hey Ralf! Sue me, go on Ralf, published the transcripts yet? We can then find out who O’ Hallorans solicitor passed the transcripts to. Be careful what you wish for.
Ames can be pursued through the criminal courts. Fraud. Tricky and expensive, but I’d think people have more chance of getting their money back via that route. That of course applies to cash investors rather than SIPP investors.
HI FDNRM, I’m sure I’ve asked you this question before, but why do you spend so much time debating on here? You’re happy with your investment and HP as an operation and are getting your expected return. So why not log out and never look back? Just think of all the hours you would reclaim!
Hi Anon RU, what about Crozier’s plan to got after the Ames’ personal assets? I’ve always been dubious about that approach as HP are a Ltd. company which protects the owners doesn’t it?
@”Ralph” Newman, An extract for letter sent to investors, thought you might like to read it. And I QUOTE
“Working with Mr O’Halloran at the time of the fraudulent misappropriation was Jeremy Newman, a senior manager of Harlequin’s previous accountants and auditors, Wilkins Kennedy. After the fraudulent misappropriation was uncovered and both Mr O’Halloran and Mr Newman fled the Caribbean, an anonymous smear campaign began through a website hosted in Singapore, which spread seriously defamatory statements about Harlequin. Harlequin alleges that, through the website, Mr Newman sent damaging allegations to various media and official organisations, such as the UK Serious Fraud Office. Harlequin faced scrutiny and undue criticism as a result.
After several months, a forensic IT investigation traced the website’s IP address to Mr Newman’s home in Maidenhead, Berkshire, and he subsequently confessed to administering the website. Harlequin alleges that Mr O’Halloran was also involved with the defamatory website. Mr Newman now runs a development company called Kelltek Group with which Mr O’Halloran is also involved.”
Now “Ralph” why dont you run along and stop trying to intimidate me. It has not worked, will not work.
As I said can of worms has now been opened by you.
@Sid, nice sentiment, but as you know I’m 64 working/not working/claiming benefits/not claiming benefits. The list of lies goes on. One reason and one reason only. People post on here out of misplaced ignorance. And I do sympathize with them, I told Conned the other week I felt for his problems, but he has returned to the usual name calling. Every thing I have said on here I have proved. Getting a rental return, being an investor etc etc.and being called some disusting things for it to So yes my wife would like me to spend more time doing the things I should be doing but this is a bit of a hobby, a bit like BBaywatch trawling through every journal he can get his hands on, or Yatinkiteasy riding round the islands on his bike. And “Ralf” getting up tight and personal was like a red rag to a bull. Off for a pint, I have something to celibrate.
A further can of worms will be opened when the Newman / Wilkins Kennedy defamation case starts.
I don’t know what their strategies will be but I assume WK will take the approach that they can’t be liable for something a member of their staff does.
If I was Mr Newman, I suspect the only way I could prove myself innocent of the allegations would be to put everything up in front of the court and try to prove the allegations are true. On that basis we will see all of the information that used to be on the Harlecon website produced and pored over in (semi) public.
The core of the case appears to be that Mr Newman said Harlequin was a Ponzi scheme. If Harlequin loses, that will prove it was a Ponzi. If Mr Newman loses, Harlequin get to try to wrestle his house away from him (men of straw tend to have little in the way of assets). It all seems a bit nuts – but that tends to be a feature of the Harlequin approach.
Anyone fancy splitting the cost of a stenographer so we can get the transcripts in the public domain?
Sid, fraud is a criminal offence. No assets are protected if Ames is found guilty of fraud.
For clarity, I am talking about Ames senior. It’s ironic that Ames junior is being trialled for fraud as we speak. Wonder if any of the investors Matt lied to and stole from are discussing it on a forum out there somewhere? Poor buggers.
The Ames family do appear to be out and out liars and crooks adept at fraudulently taking money off thousands of people and ruining any number of lives in the process. Shocking that they have been allowed to carry on so conspicuously.
SGD – I thought any member of the public could sit in on a court case? Boy, would I love to be at the Newman trial. Talk about Ames’ dirty underwear being jet blasted in public.
I am somewhat surprised that Harlequin have continued with the defamation action. I always expected them to back off long before it ever got to court as I cannot for the life of me imagine that even Ames is that blinded by his own delusions to want to give the Harlequin critics a chance to justify what they’ve said in court.
I truly cannot wait for it. Whatever the outcome. I think it’s very important that the court case is reported on.
Bob we just stumbled upon this a record of what transpired in the court on Day 11.
When we find more we will be sure to bring it to your attention
https://anonfiles.com/file/4db6384ffc0993d3b30da8104d9bba36
If you think I’m downloading some obscure site with viruses you have another think coming. Dream on.
I can’t help but keep telling myself that a “Ponzi Scheme” occurs
when the investments of later purchasers are used to pay “returns”
to earlier purchasers. Bobbie,36/FDNRM/et-alia has publicly demonstrated
to Fatchett that he has been receiving funds from HD. Double duh!,
I am not a rocket scientist but does’nt that sort of wrap it up.
I love the irony that Bob just may be the one who brings the whole
house of cards down. Good work Bobbie.
Hi Bob. Its very odd. Its the same website used by Harlequin to post pictures of Mr. Newman et al.
Why dont you head down to an internet cafe tomorrow and download it there?
Matt Ames presumably expects that he will not get be getting a prison sentence for his fraud charge because he is in St Vincent running BB and discussing with certain people the purchase of a house.
Looks from the transcript as though Mac should have gone to the hearing – its all his fault as he was running everything including checking that the work on site had been carried out.
Mrs Ames does not appear to have much of a handle on anything though. Is that for real?
she is titular
After reading Shipley’s report, the Irish Court Judgement and now the transcripts it really is incredible to think that these buffoons were able to raise the thick end of half a billion pounds.
@BegBelief – Neo-Colonialism taken to a micro/individual level.
I wonder what Matt Ames’ employees must think. And all of this
happening in a Bolivarian Paradise.
Thought Bob had flushed himself down the john with his i pad…what a pity it did not happen.
Extraordinary isn’t it – the professed socialist and Marxist hand in glove with the very worst aspects of completely unfettered rentier capitalism greed.
Yatink…they dug him up at Buccament in 2010 along with
the recently installed landscaping. It happens when you have
pipes to nowhere.
(Flush twice..its a long way to the beach)
More from the court over the next few days. We have been given site of documents which demonstrate that Mr. David Edward Ames sent transcripts of the court case in Ireland to a number of media organisations including the BBC.
I can’t wait to read how the grand-poobah himself responds to
some of the questions. Ralph do you have any indication as to whether
they have been sanitized or not?
We have been contacted by our journalistic colleagues who will over the next week be directing us to a website which they claim contains documents freely available from the UK courts pertaining to a certain upcoming defamation case which they claim are explosive.
We have been told that the documents which are appearing on the website are a true and accurate reflection of what was said in court.
Hopefully TS and FDNRM will be able to authenticate them against the transcripts held by their friend Mr. Ames and his in house solicitor ST or could it be TS.
@BBaywatch re Matt Ames
Of course he is trying to get the dates changed, he is too busy trying to act the great ‘I am’ in Buccament Bay
@FDNRM
You are behaving like Ericabroughton,you have gone all weird – next think you will think he is a PI and call the police!!!!!!!!!
@”Ralph” Newman. Just publish your transcripts on here and be done with it. If you are so sure of yourself why be so coy?
FDNRM must be lonely having solo sex all the time…..
Looks to me that ‘Ralf who ever he is’ has got an awful lot of information on HP
So mote it be
FDNRM just click on the link we provided you. We are sure the others will confirm its not a virus.
its clean…and confirmed.
We would like to put the issue of Harlequin and the notion that they have hired Private Investigators to follow individuals to rest. Well sort of. We can confirm that not only have Harlequin hired PI’s to follow individuals and intercept electronic communications they have “boasted” about it to the media.
In one letter we have seen from Carter Ruck in response to a query on the matter of the legality of the surveillance by Harlequin. All Carter Ruck would say was that all future ” Surveillance ” would be carried out legally.
Again purchasers money has been used for this purpose. We know that some on this forum have been derided and ridiculed for believing that they were under surveillance. Sadly we can now confirm that Ames did indeed engage in these activities.
Erica come out of the cold…..I for one miss you
We have been just directed to the following links by our journalistic colleagues, Thank you guys.
FDNRM et al, The links below are to documents that were sent to various media organisations by Harlequin
It appears that a number of media outlets ran the story based on the text supplied by Harlequin. These documents were sent out prior to the Judgement being published.
FDNRM TS you might note from the document the many references made to the court transcripts, for example ” This can be seen at Day 23 page 37 (23;37) of the court transcripts of Mr Newman’s evidence.”
Now we have no intention of joining Harlequin in the infringement of the copyright of the transcripts which you were so good to point out to us so vigorously over the past few days. So we will not publish them. Not the Gwen Mallone Transcripts.
Would it be too much to ask given that you have the number of Gwen Mallone Stenographers to ask you to call them to bring to their attention this as you perceive it copyright infringement by Harlequin.
https://anonfiles.com/file/75a81cfbf8649c93f483277c20e3285c
https://anonfiles.com/file/9703a5e668ae58146e02d620f99415e0
Jeremy Newman where is the proof that Harlequin provided the transcripts? They refer to them but there is no evidence that they were shared.
My name is short for Truth Seeker by the way. I am sure the solicitor who helped to destroy you in court has more wit than to reverse his initials.
And so after all the BARKING from Jeremy Newman all we have are selected files posted to an anonymous website. That is not at all like your Harlecon days.
Where is your proof that Harlequin posted photos of Jeremy Newman on that dodgy website?
TS we have asked our journalistic colleagues to find for us the records pertaining to Mr. Newman’s time in the stand in the Irish Court and we will get them to you via this forum.
Then we poll the readers to see if they feel Mr. Newman was destroyed in court.
Will be interesting to see if they concur.
As for the proof that Mr. Ames and Harlequin have sent transcripts to the media, all in good time my friend, all in good time.
TS were you at the court case in Ireland on the day/days that Mr. Newman took the stand. We ask this given your statement that Simon Terry helped destroy Mr. Newman in court. Was Mr. Terry an active participant in the trial. We thought Mr. Terry was a solicitor, is he in fact a barrister?
@ralf Newman, just give it up Jeremy, the court case will happen and you, MacDonald and WK can have your day in court. This will happen. So stop wasting your energies on here and get on sorting your defence. And while you are at it why not post all of your transcript rather than selective bits? “Let’s have a poll” you ought to be on Jeremy Kyle.
By the way just letting all my followers know I am painting for the next 2 hours, why not pop round Jeremy I can lend you a paintbrush, after all you know where I live.
Ok so Bob.
We reckon Harlequin are going full bore after Newman, McDonald and Wilkins Kennedy. The defamation case should be starting any time soon now.
Is the case not due very soon Bob?
Our bet is that Newman and Co. will try and delay matters. Would you not agree Bob?
And we see that Matt Ames may well be innocent. Carol Ames is on record as saying her family intends on suing the Insolvency Service as well as London City Police.
See all Matt did was to use investor money for marketing purposes. Is that not correct Bob?
Will you keep followers updated? Thank you Bob.
The Harlequin solicitors were instrumental in assisting the QC with the case. You should know they were in the court with you.
This is so very desperate and pathetic.
The judgment is clear as day and the evidence presented in court implicated you in the fraud and deceit so sharing selected transcripts from a dodgy website will not help you.
The word is that Paudie has now cut you off Jeremy because he was sick of financing your failed ventures. First with Harlecon and now with Kelltek. Kelltek Group or Kelltek Limited as you registered it will fail before it even began because no one will want to work with a fraudster and his key witness. Your website does not even have contact details. How can you buy more teddy bears with no income?
You will lose the case and be ruined Jeremy and WK as your employer will pay up. Accept your fate and put your energies into making what you can of your sorry life.
Think about your poor wife. She is now the sole bread winner and you are wasting your time trolling on BFP.
Hi FDNRM, what colour are you painting the walls, Harlequin blue? 😉
TS everyone on this forum knows that you believe us , we, I in this case as I am the only person typing this particular post, to be Mr. Jeremy Newman, so us, we, I and everyone else on this forum will have to accept that you believe that us, we, I were in court. Furthermore there is no denying the fact that Mr. Newman was in the court.
That’s not what we asked. We asked if you were in the court. See you appear to be very knowledgeable of the facts pertaining to the issues raised in the court but not contained in the judgement. The transcripts perhaps. Although you have put a rather different slant as to the facts as they appear in the judgement.
Who cares about O’HAlloran and Newman. It’s Ames that took our money and did not protect it. This FDNR/Bob character is transparently a Harlequin plant, why do people interact with him? He is deflecting everyone from the facts, Ames took our money, made himself rich and did not build our holiday units. Harlecon came along years later.
@Sid, woodwork, colour is “Ralph” Lilly livered white.
Jeremy I was not in the court but yes I do know a lot about the case.
We both have journalist friends it seems. One of my journalist friends is Irish.
I also read the judgment front to back and copied and pasted parts above. If that is somehow putting a slant on the facts then you are accusing the Ireland court of spin.
Now answer my questions Jeremy.
Where is your proof that Harlequin posted photos of you on that dodgy anonymous website?
Where is the proof that Harlequin provided the transcripts? They refer to them but there is no evidence that they were shared. You would have uploaded them too if they were attached.
Thank you Simon. We will move off the subject of Newman et Al for the moment and focus in on the finances of Harlequin. We will need to revert to the judgement and transcripts to explain this in more detail but we will also be able to furnish you with previously unseen accounting records for Harlequin, which purchasers and RL amongst others should find very interesting.
So you are confirming that you are full of it and have no proof. Thank you for that.
Let us not leave the subject of Newman and MacDonald because they were complicit in the fraud of millions and deceit that threatened every Harlequin investor.
Share the transcripts of when you were cross-examined Newman.
Another part from the judgment featuring Martin MacDonald:
Throughout the proceedings, Mr. MacDonald was generally referred to by the soubriquet of “Mac”. Mac was a partner in the accountancy firm of Wilkins Kennedy. Mrs. Ames got to know him when she was employed with Patten Pools (Construction) Ltd. As the plaintiffs’ business grew, they needed someone who could advise them on financial matters and Mac became the point of contact between the plaintiffs and Wilkins Kennedy. But he was more than that. He eventually became de facto the Chief Financial Officer of the plaintiff’s company as he carried out work going way beyond the role of an accountant. He also became a close personal friend of Mr. and Mrs. Ames and they trusted him absolutely. Although Mr. MacDonald played a pivotal role in the events giving rise to this litigation, it is of some significance that he was not called to give evidence, nor did he supply a witness statement.
Simon of course we will provide the evidence to show that Harlequin sent the transcripts to media organisations, in due course. It would be wrong of us not to do so.
However we would now like to deal with the issue of the financial affairs of Harlequin. Simon we are sure you will understand that most purchasers will be far more concerned about their investments than some possible copy right infringement issue.
We will start the issue of Harlequin’s finances off by asking a question vis a vee the Irish judgement.
We believe that having reviewed all the evidence put before him ( expert witness testimony included ) the judge in the Irish Case delivered his judgement.
And we do not believe anyone on this forum has questioned the outcome of the case nor the evidence put before the court with of course the exception on the concerns we have raised with respect to the veracity of the evidence provided by Garret Ronan in respect of RLB.
So in broad terms we can all agree that the judge made a fair call on the evidence presented to him. TS FDNRM would you not agree?
@ Carole Ames is more clueless than her husband, they both have a nice new set of teeth, no doubt paid for by investors 😉 Simon Terry the over paid solicitor – £120,000 pa is a tad over the going rate, is it not?
@”Ralph” Newman,”We will need to revert to the judgement and transcripts” Good, then post them in their entirity on here then Or Jeremy how about your Linkedin site. Oh I forgot, that will be locked soon like tour Twitter account. Off to any WW11 conventions this weekend befor your house is reposessed? Back off to the painting now.
So you can post the email but not the imaginary attachments? OK Jeremy Newman whatever you say.
I believe finances are important and that you and your Wilkins Kennedy friend Mac threatened them for every investor.
TS, lets face it the old bat Carole and stupid thick toad face dwarf have only managed to build a few cabanas in a little crappy little island with £400 million, anyone could do better than that!!! Its just one big ego trip.
You do seem to be getting a bit uptight about Ralph, he is the only one that seems to have any intelligence on here……and is a threat.
O’ Halloran ripped them off cos they are dim and he could, the family ripped off investors because they are arrogant sociopaths.
Buccement Bay is shit…..nothing to do and plastic glasses – an Essex persons dream at quality.
TS FDNRM we all agree I think that based on the evidence provided to the court that the Judges judgement is a fair and accurate reflection of events as per the evidence presented? And if that includes the complicity of Mr. Mac Donald, Mr. Newman and Co. so be it. Would you both not agree with us on this matter. ?
Funny how it keeps winning awards.
LL – You write like I think
R – You have my respect but please it is vis-a-vis
TS – Funny as in haha or funny as in not quite right
Funny as in it clearly is not s**t.
Acknowledged anonymous. TS would you agree with us on the judgement?
TS – “Funny how it keeps winning awards”
Are you suggesting that the Harlequin project has been a success? That Dave Ames has managed the undertaking competently? That he should be allowed to remain in charge of the operation? That investors are getting a good deal?
@Anon, LS, or should it be LT, you write like I think. What as in complete completely muddled? Read the sentence again regarding how O’Halloran ripped them off because they are dim and he could and investors were ripped off because?
Loony toons – you struck a chord when you said “an Essex persons
dream at quality”. What is with the somewhat Polynesian/South Seas/
Disneyesque architecture of BBay? It is pure kitsch and there is
nothing/zero/zip/zilch 5-Star about that “tacky” design. Good enough
for a 5-Star mini-golf course at best. The two apartment blocks
look like something in East Berlin before the fall of the wall. Totally
institutional and proletarian.
World Travel Awards is a self nominated money making scam, where folks are invited to pay approx €400 per category. They have THOUSANDS of categories. The couple running this scam keep a low profile but are multimillionaires .
It is quite a joke, but for many in the Tourism Industry , it’s a chance to get a nice Award they can boast about and hang on the wall in the lobby.(the plaque for winners cost another €300 or so each.
To demonstrate the joke that it is, 2013 “nominees” for best Airline in the Caribbean include Liat and Air Cubana!
It’s just Essex chav’s that think they are sophisticated, drinking cheap fizzy wine out of plastic glasses – believing its champagne….. with their false teeth or dental implants.
Are you sure Harlequin don’t run Liat 😉
Matt lording round BB thinking he actually has a job and not facing jail – classic Ames delusion.
Another thing he got from Ames toad stumpy, apart from fraud that is.
TS is you are a toss pot
TS – I will ask again:
Are you suggesting that the Harlequin project has been a success? That Dave Ames has managed the undertaking competently? That he should be allowed to remain in charge of the operation? That investors are getting a good deal?
TS FDNRM are you both happy that the Irish judgement is correct in so far as it is representative of the evidence presented to the courts.? Would you both agree that the judgement was correct?
Ralphy boy, stop posting as RAlph and Anonumous. The facade is too obvious. Do you want me to get a paint brush out for you Jeremy? Why did you lock your twitter account?
Buccament is a big success and demonstrates that Harlequin can and will do what they set out to do. Do not forget that O’Halloran, Newman and MacDonald caused a large part of Harlequin’s problems starting with the failed development of Buccament, fraud and Harlecon.
I bet Jane is proud that Jeremy spends all day trolling on here to somehow dig himself out of the hole he made from trolling before. Scum of the earth.
Hi Jeremy just wondered why your LinkedIn connections include a lady from “pressed to impress ironing services”
@TS
Would you also rate Buccament Bay as a “great success” for all those people who bought a property there?
From the answers of Mr. Terry and Mr. Storey we take it they concur with the judgement.
Over the next few days we will demonstrate to purchasers what the Ames family did with your money with the support of Mr. Simon Terry with seemingly little or no regard for purchasers. We will demonstrate that the accounts produced by Harlequin were not reflective of the actual situation as it pertained.
Harlequin are demonstrating the lengths they are prepared to go to in an attempt at intimidating persons wholly unconnected to their operations.
We are amazed at the lengths to which Harlequin are prepared to go to stop or stifle debate on the issues
We will highlight Project Orange, amongst many of the issues that made Harlequin a very unsafe investment indeed.
And then we will leave it up to you folks out there to decide what action if any you feel you need to take.
Feel free to use the information we will be providing in assisting you or your legal representatives in deciding what course of action you wish to take.
BB yes absolutely. The fact it is a big commercial and industry success despite the delayed airport can only lead to that conclusion.
TS maintains that Buccament Bay has been a great success!
I’m reminded of the infinite monkey theory, which suggests that a monkey hitting keys at random on a typewriter for an infinite amount of time will end up with the complete works of Shakespeare.
Given 7 years and half a billion pounds Ames is well on the way with 150 properties already built. Throw in a few more billion and a millenia or two and we may have a complete resort on our hands.
Hi Jeremy, enjoy your look at my LinkedIn profile yesterday? And what did it tell you? Absolutely Jack S***t. Are you getting desperate yet?
Hey Jeremy, “From the answers of Mr. Terry and Mr. Storey we take it they concur with the judgement.” HA HA How does the Supertramp song go “Dreamer, your nothing but a dreamer” Have you transferred your house in Bray into your wife’s name yet. Being a “tax planner” I guess you have that worked out by now. Should have stuck to tax planning rather than defamation and Fraud. OOPS sorry, going to sue me?
TS If Buccament Bay is the success you claim it to be. Why are Harlequin refusing to show the accounts.? The Irish transcripts demonstrate this very clearly. Mr. O Halloran’s legal team fought vigorously for sight of the accounts. Harlequin refused and their refusal was up held by the judge.
These are the same accounts ( unaudited ) that Harlequin claim to have filed in the Caribbean, yet to date no one can find them.
And surprise surprise, the new “Phoinexed” HMSSE “Harlequin Hotels and Resorts Ltd” the company that Mr. Terry is now company solicitor for on the SRA website is headquartered in the Cayman Islands, a country which does not require you to file accounts. So how would a purchaser know what his 50% net room share would be.
Mr. Newman has not been found guilty of any act. He is however continuing with his defence of the defamation action along with Mr. Mac Donald and Wilkins Kennedy. Yet Harlequin resort to calling him scum.
Very sad.
TS…..you are deluded fool or worse still you are simply posting on behalf of HP. Actually probably both! At least FDNRM has a hint of credibility in comparison.
It is not only Harlequin who think Jeremy Newman is scum so it is desperate to claim I am they. You threatened everyone’s investments for greed and continue to try to ruin it all so you can avoid court so yes you are scum.
It is the same old Harlecon trick of posting nonsense, refusing to answer questions and insulting the directors. Learn a new trick. Better yet accept you are a spiteful failure and move on with your life.
“The fact it is a big commercial and industry success” – oohh it’s the return of Hardlysuccess!
TS, your constant sparring with Ralph has put Ole King Troll Maximum Bob on constant alert and he’s frotting himself into a lather 24/7. For heavens sake man, have some decency and give him a rest, it must chafe so, what with all the hair on the palms.
( a lift of the lid to CartoonistRowson for that one)
@TS some life that will be. Court costs, penalties, at least Newman can do the ironing companies accounts for them.
@TS
Harlequin and Buccament Bay are the laughing stock of the travel industry.
The Ames family is despised, especially in the Caribbean, as a bunch of arrogant no mark chavs who don’t pay their bills. Dave Ames has been recorded telling whopping great lies – who is to say that what was contained in any of the legal documents presented by Harlequin was truthful? The answer is we don’t know and we probably will never get to the truth. What we do know is that the Ames family on the whole are unreliable and that Dave Ames is a liar.
A lot of money is unaccounted for and it wasn’t all nicked by Paudie and his pater, so where it the rest Dave?
@BBaywatch, you think I’m a troll. Anyone who thinks its funny to post personal details on a web site, threaton to go to the tax authorities just hasn’t seen anything yet. Give him a rest? Nothing one eyed about you is there.
@ Bob36/
What a hypocrite you are – you are the one who posted the wrong house and had to apologise.
How does Betty stand you?
ANd you don’t seem to understand how Linkedin works either.
@some mothers do etc.
1)wrong not wrong house, wrong owner. MacDonald lives with his mother and its not his house.
2)Betty is my 90 year old mother moron.
3)oh yes I do. Idiot
TS taking your rationale on board. The following people should also be considered scum.
1. Alan Bell Former VP of Harlequin Hotels and Resorts (Accused by David and Carol Ames of Accountancy Fraud in 2009 )
Amount circa $500,000.00
SCUM?
2. Ken Picknell Former Project Manager of the Buccament Bay Resort construction site.
(Accused of theft and Fraud by David and Carol Ames 2007-2008 )
Amount unknown.
SCUM?
3. Ridgeview Construction ( Accused of misappropriation and fraud and referred to in Irish Trial 2007-2008 )
Amount $29,000,000.00
SCUM?
Advised by Mr. MacDonald to pursue them in court. Advised by Mr. Commissiong SVG attorney at law to Harlequin not to pursue because of negative press it would cause.
4. DLA Piper ( Former lawyers for Harlequin accused of Overcharging Harlequin)
Amount unknown.
SCUM?
5. Matthew David Ames. (Took a personal bonus of $ 1,000,000.00 after selling out s phase of Dominican Republic in early 2008. Left Harlequin shortly afterwards after falling out with Dave Ames over bonus. )
Amount $1,000,000
SCUM?
6. RLB (Harlequin alleged they took bribes in 2009 to over inflate construction costs at Buccament Bay)
Amount unknown
SCUM?
7. Carol Ann Ames ( Borrowed Purchaser funds without their knowledge for the purchase of personal properties for the Ames family)
Amount < $5,000,000.00
SCUM?
8. ICE Group / Mr. O Halloran ( Fraud 13 million ongoing litigation including counter claim by ICE)
Amount $13,000,000
SCUM?
9. RLB ( Alleged to have engaged in document tampering by Harlequin in Irish Courts)
SCUM?
10. Agents and IFA's (Now being pursued for miss selling by a number of legal firms, including HMSSE.
Amount $202,000,000
SCUM?
11. David Edward Ames, Carol Ann Ames, Matthew David Ames, Daniel Ames, Nicola Kelliher (Potential Illegal Dividends to the shareholders of HMSSE as advised by BDO and currently being probed)
Amount <$2,500,000
SCUM?
12. Wilkins Kennedy and Martin Mac Donald (Professional Negligence Claim being considered by Harlequin since 2010. Not yet initiated.
SCUM Yes according to TS.
13. Jeremy Newman, Wilkins Kennedy and Martin MacDonald. (Defamation case being brought by Harlequin. Trial Date not confirmed)
SCUM Yes according to TS.
14. Harlequin Property et Al ( failure to make interest payments to purchasers.)
SCUM?
15. Harlequin Property et Al. ( failure to complete as per contractual obligations)
SCUM?
16. Harlequin Property et Al. ( Selling property on land not owned)
SCUM?
17. Procure it Direct, Andy Smith. ( Harlequin allege Mr. Smith miss appropriated monies from Harlequin)
Amount $ 1,000,000
SCUM?
18. Port Vale football club (owe Harlequin money)
$100,000
SCUM?
A whopping 250 million USD now in dispute. 1/4 billion USD in contention. Your money. Purchaser Money.
Have a long hard think folks.
(This does not include all ongoing or past litigation, disputes or investigations)
FDNRM Are you the Bob Storey that made a report to the SFO?
Can you also confirm if any one else has in the past or more recently posted on these forums using your ID “FDNRM” Whether be known to you or otherwise?
FDNRM if you are Bob Storey can you confirm you met with Garret Fatchett to demonstrate you were getting a return.
FDNRM if you are Bob Storey can you confirm that the SFO informed you that Mr. Mac Donald was interviewed under section 2.
FDNRM if you are Bob Storey can you confirm that the SFO informed you that they did not act on Mr. Newmans first complaint.
FDNRM if you are Bob Storey would you be willing to state where you got your information from if it was not from the SFO.
FDNRM if you are Bob Storey have you ever gone by the name Richard Ixxxxx. Or would you perhaps be acquainted or in contact with an individual by that name on matters pertaining to Harlequin.
Your response would be much appreciated.
FDNRM Mr. Mac Donald’s mother passed away in November 2011.
Is Jeremy I bet it would be appreciated. And you can swivel.
Ralph in your SCUM post @6.03 you managed to give a reference
point in time for when the scam/ponzi began. ’07-08. When, and
it will happen, the testimony of Smuthwaite and Picknell during the
trial of Ames will be damning. May he rot in hell ! Nasty, nasty
little man. The range and scope of the honest lives that he has
harmed is unbelievable.
Anonymous We are trying to demonstrate the manic attempts by a number of Harlequin supporters to deflect attention away from Harlequin.
The Ames family continue to ruin lives. Lie in court on oath then get others to lie for them.
In the court transcripts you will see that Harlequin claim little or no work was done at Buccament Bay prior to Mr. David Campion taking over the project.
An example of the lengths that Harlequin will go to, to lie is contained below.
Harlequin produced “Independant expert Witnesses” for example BCQS produced a report where the monies paid to Ridgeview $5,000,000 were deducted from the value of work as having been estimated by BCQS $ 26,000,000. Giving a total of $21,000,000 attributed to ICE Group.
Then at the latter stages of the trial a senior member of Harlequins accounting staff Paul McTaggart gave evidence that the monies paid to Ridgeview were $34 million. Had the true figure of $34 million been given to BCQS when they were compiling their report the value of work done by ICE Group would have been -8,000,000 a negative figure.
If the correct figure had been given to BCQS it would have had the rather bizarre affect of basically demonstrating that Ridgeview had been over paid by 8 million USD and ICE group by 50 million USD.
Very few if any people would have believed this so Harlequin manipulated the information provided to their independent experts.
BCQS did caveat their report by saying all information pertaining to the contract was supplied by Harlequin.
In another example of the extent that Harlequin will lie to purchasers, the media etc. Harlequin publically stated that they had engaged an independent firm in Essex to audit payments made by HMSSE to the Caribbean companies and that this firm confirmed that the audit gave HMSSE a clean bill of health. As the court transcripts will clearly demonstrate this was not in fact an audit and only covered the period to 2009. It must also be noted that one of the senior managers of this “Independant” firm was Adela Chalmers a former CFO of HMSSE who was employed by HMSSE in 2011.
It is for this reason and many others that Harlequin do not want the court transcripts made public. We will deal with all of these issues in greater detail.
Ralph – as I said the amount of harm done to honest people
is unbelievable. Whoever you are and whatever your end-game
is so far you have been the most knowing person yet. I am sure
Yatinkiteasy, BBaywatch, 100, 73, Saint George’s Dragon and
myself are parsing every word you post. I know I left a lot
off. Just thought of Eddie Lizzard 2, mug, erica on and on and on.
So at last Jeremy you have posted direct from the court transcripts which is against copyright rules. This could be interesting.
TS Buccement Bay is shit, SVG is a two bit shanty town – great place to build a shit resort. You are no doubt form Essex and know no better.
@Bob36/
you don’t understand copyright law either,
HAs Karen let you off painting over your skid marks in the bathroom yet?
The real number of units built and able to be used by guests is closer to 100 than 150………………… that must value each one at millions!
fdnrm…….what you gonna do when hp is wopund up and yr income is cut off no title to your villa…but then what if you have had a chunk of money you are not due, now would that make you party to the fraud…hmmmm maybe that why you defend HP etc so stongly….maybe you gonna be doing some time inside also
there again you could just be an arrogant areshole
Bob – do you also think that Buccament Bay is a big commercial and industry success?
TS is Simon
Ralph is Newman
Bob is Bob
Whatsthefuss is Matt
This doesn’t matter of course but its fun as a cluedo game, anyone challenge?
All of these people also post under other names so any other thoughts…
Anon – I’ve been working on a board game (hopefully for Parker Bros)
Its called PONZI. There will be no “get out of jail free card”. Each
player is issued enough money to put 30% down on a villa/cabana
on a mythical resort developement called Buccaneer Land on the
island of St Trinian somehere in the Caribbean. The evil developer
is called Dave Shames……..all sorts of evil tricks happen to con the
players out of their deposit. Anon 9:27 please take over….
Its ok Bob there appears to be no copyright infringement. But it really is irrelevant. The transcripts may help purchasers in getting an understanding for the position they find themselves in.
We have been advised that more will follow. In addition we have been advised that all public documents pertaining to the defamation case will be available as well.
And information on Project Orange the clean up Operation to hide some of Harlequins very serious issues.
Ralph – Can you give some sort of hint as to what Project Orange
is. I detect the hint of some really big exposure.
Matt Ames…..have you thrown any phones at your Dad recently?
You should tell your mother her teeth look really stupid….your Dads not much better.
How’s your poncy little brother? looking forward to becoming a postman again?
You need to be careful as you are getting a little rotund….. soon loose that when your in der nick!!!
13 years not being a director – what will you do? maybe get your wife to act for you ……bit like Daddy eh?
Safe to say any purchaser with a lawyer should request full details of project orange from Harlequin. It was a series of meetings instigated in early 2009 by Harlequins then solicitors DLA Piper who Harlequin fell out with some time later when Harlequin accused DLA Piper of over charging. DLA Piper were concerned that the activities of Harlequin at that time would have attracted the attention of the authorities, who would have instigated a dawn raid. The existence of project orange was uncovered by reporters from the BBC Panorama program and Matthew Chapman.
Sadly Matthew was getting to close to uncovering some really nasty going’s on with in Harlequin and the rest is history so to speak.
Matthew was coming too close for comfort in exposing the Ames family. Unfortunately Sean Ghent who was employed at the time by Ames was brought into the fray.
If we were conspiracy theorists then we would say that Mr. Chapman was set up. A distinguished award winning investigative journalist, who was trying to seek the truth and was on the verge of exposing the Ames family became another victim. The vitriolic nature of the Ames family then is similar to what it is now.
You just have to look at the list of individuals and companies who prior to having met the Ames family may have had nothing more then a parking ticket.
Bell, Picknell, Smurtwaith, Newman, O Halloran, O Halloran Snr. Mac Donald, Spencer, Floyd, Chapman, Cellate, DLA Piper, Wilkins Kennedy, RLB, and lest not we forget the initial claims in Ireland that Fujitsu and Bank of Ireland were also involved in money laundering all though in the case of the latter two Ames was probably told to drop that allegation given how preposterous it was.
Sean Ghent if anyone cares to Google him has had a rather colourful history with Paul McCartney and Heather Mills.
It was Ghent that was responsible for coordinating the illegal surveillance of individuals at the behest of Ames. There is also persuasive evidence that Ghent at the behest of Ames indulged in illegal electronic tapping. The issue was raised with Carter Ruck who assured those concerned that all surveillance from the date of the letter would be illegal.
Correction Carter Ruck stated that any surveillance after their letter would be legal.
The list of individuals is just a sample of the lives Ames has tried to ruin.
In mid 2009 Ames fell out with Oasis after a meeting in Spain with Oasis threathening to sue him for breach of contract.
In 2008 he falsified documentation in order to entice Gary Player on board.
In 2010 Harlequin used forged documents to get their initial freezing applications against the ICE group companies through the courts.
In 2011 Harlequin produced false accounts in an Irish security for costs case. They will claim it was a 20 million pound mistake.
And it goes on and on.
Ralph –
1 – It is Smurthwaite (my mistake)
2 – DLA Piper seems to be the progenitor of Project Orange. I assume
it is up to them to provide a explanation of what it is.
3 – The Harlequin mess just keeps getting more and more convoluted
the deeper one digs,
Thanks Ralph
@Ralph Newman, your ramblings get worse. So it was ames fault that you. O’halloran and MacDonald decided to de fraud him. And stop pretending that Anon 11.14,is a different person. We can all see you are one of the same.
But Bobbet 36/- you change your name to suit sometimes and you have even impersonated other people on here. Not only are you a hypocrite but you got caught out by your own stupidity when you forgot to change the name you posted under. lol
And by the way it was most definitely Ames’ fault that the money got mislaid – what competent business man would not insist on a legal contract in a deal of that magnitude? Mind you Ames is unable to account for quite a lot of money at the moment. It stinks very fishy to me.
FDNRM you are pathetic.You are also a liar and quite a dangerous person to boot.
We are not Jeremy Newman nor Martin Mac Donald.
Well “Ralph” you have nothing to worry about then have you. Why are you so worried about me? A liar and quite dangerous am I? Why would that be Jeremy? Why were you looking at my LinkedIn profile 2 days ago? Coincidence? You are interested on making me a business proposition perhaps? Don’t make me laugh you muppet.
@EL2 and who do you think I impersonated?
I am sorry but I think that you are all losing the plot. Dave Ames has committed a crime of false representation under the Fraud Act 2006 and should be reported to the Director of SFO in London This is a criminal offence. and it is the only way to get your money back. The gagging orders that you have all signed are not worth the paper they are written on. The lawyers and agents are interested only in making money It is interesting that now Matthew Ames is running Buccament Bay having been banned for 13 years from being a Director and is now on bail in the Caribbean!!. Great… .
Great idea anonymous at 9:07am! Quick, somebody call the SFO!
Let’s cut through all the accusations and counter-accusations being flung around.
Let’s be as generous as it is possible to be towards the whole Harlequin operation. Let’s assume that Harlequin has never done anything fraudulent or illegal or even morally doubtful.
Let’s read the Irish court case judgement with an open mind.
Even then, can anyone honestly say that Harlequin have demonstrated a level of professionalism as a developer to be trusted with any future building project? This judgement, combined with the track record of taking around £400m over 7 years to create a semi-complete resort. Wouldn’t it be quite difficult to perform that poorly?
Comments from TS and FDNRM please.
More specifically, the decision to not protect purchaser funds with a contract needs an answer. Would TS or FDNRM like to comment on this.
To embark on a build programme of this scale with one’s own money (maybe that’s what Harlequin thought they were doing!) without a contract would just be stupid. Doing so with other people’s money surely is professional negligence. Does anyone want to challenge this view?
How can any specification have been defined without a contract to bind the parties to? How can a build programme have been set out with late delivery penalties without a contract to bind the parties? How can any number of basic protections of purchaser funds been put in place without a contract to bind the parties?
In short how can this not be considered negligent behaviour?
It really doesn’t matter if the shadow director of the company was persuaded by someone else to be honest. Those that make the final decisions are accountable for these. People didn’t purchase properties by investing with the people who are claimed to have persuaded (with fraudulent intent) Harlequin to not have a written contract. It is frankly ludicrous to defend this. Does anyone want to?
this is a clever scam
1: pay a large amout of the takings to IRA etc…this spreads blame around a lot of other people
2: collect the funds in the uk, but send the collected money to small (known to be corrupt/no info available regimes) so again lots of different countries legal system to trawl through
3: dont keep any accounts (or at least any you will produce or admit to having)
4: award large building projects (worth millions) without any paperwork at all…to be flexible…very flexible for the scam, nothing documented at all as to what was being built and and at what cost
5: sell units in countries were you dont own the land, and let the people chase you to obtain refunds
6: buy other items such as planes and hotels, to widen the trail and make it harder to unravel
7: spread scam across lots of countries…international borders slow down dramatically the auditors tracing the scam
make no mistake this was a scam from day one and in all probability worked much better than initially expected, so greed took over…hence the wide and varied locations of proposed resorts (plus assists point 2)
I think it is/was a very clever plan, but still a scam…it will take time to unwind, and it would appear that the ames familly are born to scan and fraud
Time is the fraudsters best escape…look at the ponzi schemes…they all had a good life until almost at the end of their days
sorry post should read IFA
TS FDNRM Harlequin rumbled Harlecon not through all the money that was spent on IT experts, Lawyers and private investigators tryinq to get website host companies to divulge IP addresses etc or through illegal surveillance but by eventually masquerading as a purchaser with no hope left.
A purchaser emailed Harlecon claiming to be distressed and Mr. Newman responded in order to assist. Like many of the 100’s if not 1000’s of purchasers out there looking for help,
He inadvertently did not mask his IP address when responding to the purchaser and Harlequin managed to get a hold of his IP address. His home IP address. Not his office IP address, not Wilkins Kennedy’s IP address, Mr. Newman’s home IP address.
Furthermore despite it being Mr. Newman’s home IP address Harlequin chose to contact Mr. Newman’s employers initially and not Mr. Newman himself.
The comment by TS on the issue of Wilkins Kennedy having loads of money is quite telling.
Could it be that Harlequin added Wilkins Kennedy just to be vexatious and in the hope that Wilkins Kennedy’s insurers would pay out quickly without any adverse publicity.
Did something happen over the past number of weeks which indicated to Harlequin that Wilkins Kennedy have no intention of capitulating?
Is this why Harlequin have become increasingly vociferous on the issue of Wilkins Kennedy yet make absolutely no reference to the involvement of RLB in the fraud?
The purchaser was not genuine.
Mr. Newman tried to assist a distressed purchaser.
Mr. Newman is not alone in the personal attacks and attacks on his character directed against him by Harlequin. Mr. Chapman of the BBC tried to expose the issues pertaining to Harlequin and whilst his methods were subsequently found to be unethical they were made with the best intentions.
Garret Fatchett and others in the legal profession have been subject to attacks by Harlequin and the Ames family, with Dave Ames asking agents and purchasers to probe the ethics of Mr. Fatchett and others.
Harlequin have become very adept at covering their tracks by attacking the short comings of others who are basically seeking to uncover the truth about Harlequin in a bid to give those with a vested interest in Harlequin real transparency as to the issues surrounding this company.
Mr. Newman and others had discovered many issues pertaining to Harlequin. Not least that they were trading insolvently and relied on sales to keep the business afloat.
Ames kept selling product in the full knowledge that external finance would not or could not be obtained. Ames knew this as far back as 2009 and even alluded to this in the video of his business model at the Grove Hotel.
The reliance on sales of units to fund construction and support the business was graphically illustrated earlier this year. When sales dried up, loan interest payments to purchasers stopped and construction was halted with most if not all construction related staff laid off.
Could this be hope?
http://www.ftadviser.com/2013/08/16/opinion/blogs/fscs-review-following-court-defeat-could-spell-higher-costs-shJcFFZZcgBSvrA1N7yUTP/article-1.html
@ TS come on how would you fix Buccament Bay, its shit, on a shit island.
Mine you,apparently Essex boys think it’s great plastic glasses and white teeth and plastic tits all round…………
Classy joint…..
Unconfirmed reports from St. Vincent are claiming that Dave Ames has confirmed that the owners of Harlecon have agreed on settlement terms.
It is also being reported that Ames has stated that construction work is to recommence full bore at Buccament Bay by October.
And further more it is claimed that Ames has confirmed Matt Ames as the General Manager of the Buccament Bay and has the fullest support of his family, staff at Harlequin and investors.
Matt Ames will be contesting vigorously the wrongful decision of the insolvency service to ban him for 13 years.
Ames senior has condemned the media reports surrounding Matt Ames’s 13 year ban as being stirred up by the usual suspects and wholly unfair and unjustified given his son’s pending appeal on the matter which as Dave Ames states will vindicate his son.
Ames senior has also stated that all staff will receive payments outstanding to them for the past 3 months by Monday.
Comments anyone?
He also said a year ago that he was handing out titles to BB investors.He also said there would be a Marina at BB, and a Trader Vics, and a Customs Clearance facility at BB. He also said he would be flying Harlequin Air.He also said…………………………………….folks, fill in the blanks.
Jeremy Newman cannot maintain a cogent argument to save his or his wife’s wasted life.
One minute the judgment is absolutely spot on and the next it is wrong. Make up your petty mind!
It is transparent that this is your pathetic attempt at Harlecon V2. You do not even have the guts to post these accusations without hiding.
Ames Snr quoted that WK solicitors have offered an out of court settlement.
TS could you demonstrate to us and direct us and the readers on this forum to where we have stated that the judgement is wrong please with the exception of our references to RLB?
Would you also care to comment on the reported deal struck between Harlequin and Wilkins Kennedy.
My journalist friend witnessed the following during Jeremy Newman’s cross examination.
Jeremy Newman told the court that he was not friends with Martin MacDonald and rarely had interaction with him.
When asked when he last spoke to him the court sniggered when he said one hour ago and on 90 occasions in the last year.
Many people do not speak to their parents that often!
Jeremy was also asked if he ever went on an ICE Group business trip with Martin MacDonald and Paudie O’Halloran during his time at Harlequin. He said no but the QC presented plane tickets with Jeremy’s, Mac’s and Paudie O’Halloran’s names on them.
He cannot even keep his story straight in front of a judge. Not only malicious but apparently lacking common sense.
I suppose that would explain why he helped to steal millions and started a defamatory campaign whilst still working for Wilkins Kennedy. “Who will ever know?” he thought as he hid behind lies and now TWO anonymous accounts. Moron.
@TS I notice that although you have posted a couple of times since my earlier post you have declined to comment. Would you care do so or simply acknowledge that there is no reasonable defence to be made?
Jeremy Newman also told the court that ICE Group were insolvent and were not going to make a profit on the work at Buccament. You clearly did a great job of advising on their accounts Ralph. Oh no I forgot you helped them to steal money instead.
TS sorry but what we asked you to do was point us to where we have made conflicting statements regarding the judgement?
TS how many time do you speak to your Daddy AKA Dave Ames?
Care to elaborate on the proposed finance deal?
TS is Matt Ames
TS we will make a copy of a transcript pertaining to Mr. Newmans evidence soon,
But maybe your journalist friend did not quite here Mr. Newmans answer on a direct question by Harlequins barrister.
Q. Mr. Newman, what the position was of June 2010, if not before, is that ICE Group was insolvent, was it not?
A. No, Judge, I dont think that is a fair characterisation at all ……………….
It is also very interesting to note from the transcript how Harlequin and their legal team including Mr. Simon Terry view a company which have not yet filed and or prepared accounts. They were mire then critical but we will let readers decide once a copy of a court transcript has been uploaded.
Well done Ralph, you got them on the run!
@ Ralph
What about my theory, than units have been sold multiple times? knowing full-well people would never be in a position to complete? And will loose their deposits
Also, that TaylorMade were given a beech front Cabanna?
I also, believe the IFA investors were somehow ‘gifted’ deposits.
How could Kathrine Wooler / Manderfield afford seven deposits?
I don’t think beech will last very long. They normally use purpleheart in the Caribbean.
Anyone knows if Gary Player is still associated with the Harlequin Marquis /Gary Player Resort in St Lucia?There was so much hoopla about it in 2009…resort to be built by 2013…but yet construction not started, Harlequin in Administration…etc etc.How many people were convinced this was a good investment because of the famous 77 year old golf legend?
http://garyplayer.com/news/news_detail/presenting_the_marquis_estate/
My rep has confirmed that no deal has been done and the court case is still going ahead. More lies from Jeremy Newman what a surprise.
And now I am both a Matt and a Simon? My name begins with L to give you a clue and I have not said I am male.
Harlecon V2 like I said.
@TS I notice that you have still chosen not to comment on the points I raised at 1033 and 1136 this morning.
Do you have anything to say by way of defending the HP position or are you unable to do so?
Local sources claim that Jeremy Newman (pictured) of 5 Hasting Close, Bray, Maidenhead, Berks, is under investigation by Thames Valley Police for possession of illegal images.
Thanks for that Maidenhead Watch. It really turns everything around. After all, if Jeremy Newman has done some bad things then that makes everything to do with Harlequin OK again. Silly of me not to see the compelling weight of your logic.
TS We stated that the reports from St. Vincent were unconfirmed, we thank you for your confirmation. If that is what it is?
Beyond Belief asks a pertinent question (several times) about the culpability of Harlequin’s management team and instead of responding with a cogent and reasonably argued defence they choose instead to employ diversionary tactics, smearing one of their critics; this time it was Newman but he is simply the latest in a long list.
Typical Harlequin, typical. These guys are playing for time nothing more, nothing less.
You get used to it in here. But their refusal to answer a perfectly reasonable question speaks louder than any of the other silly nonsense they spout on about.
There seems to be this ridiculous logic to most pro-HP posters and it goes something along the lines of, “if we can show that person X or company Y is really really bad then that makes Harlequin the good guys. Why they can’t all be a bunch a crooks conning each other doesn’t seem to cross their minds. The sad thing is that if they are all a bunch of crooks then they are doing the conning with money belonging to other people and then have the shamelessness to take each other to court using other people’s money as well!
The following link is a link to the evidence of Mr. Comissiong Harlequin’s St. Vincent lawyer in the Irish case
It is well worth reading, especially if you are a purchaser. At page 30 Mr. Comissiong clearly states that Harlequin gave property deeds to purchasers.
Q. Did any purchasers get their deeds?
A. Yes, Madam
https://anonfiles.com/file/cecf0c68817265cce388930dee7ae39a
The evidence of Mr. Comissiong as it pertains to land owned by Harlequin and Mr. Ames 32 acres as opposed to 90 acres and the issue of title deeds is at odds as to what Ames and Harlequin have been stating to purchasers.
Sadly TS will jump all over this by shouting from the roof tops that Mr. MacDonald is a fraudster and Bob will whine on about copyright issues etc, but it would be very interesting to see what Mr. Fatchett has to say on the matters as they pertain to purchasers or anyone else or that mater with a knowledge of such issues.
TS would you like to comment on the issue of title having been passed to purchasers. Bob given that you have paid for your unit can you confirm that you have received title for your property?
What did Jeremy Newman do with the INVESTORS money he helped Paudie O’Halloran STEAL? Has any of it been used to create the struggling Kelltek Group?
Why did Jeremy Newman wait until after the O’Halloran fraud and ceasing to work for Harlequin before saying anything about alleged wrong doings?
Why did Jeremy Newman hide if he was doing the right thing?
Why did Jeremy Newman have to resign in disgrace when he was uncovered?
Why did Jeremy Newman lie in court?
TS – could you answer the questions raised by Beggaers Belief at 10.33 and 11.36 this morning? It’s just that not answering them undermines your credibility. People are interested in Harlequin not Jeremy Newman.
Jeremy it has been days and still you hide on an anonymous forum with files on dodgy anonymous websites.
Where is this website you promised? When will you stop being such a coward if you are supposedly doing the right thing?
TS please, a judgement has been given in Ireland and it has been accepted by all parties. We are dealing here with information very relevant to purchasers. Why has Mr. Ames lied on the issue of land ownership and on the issue of transferring title?
We will deal with your questions about Mr. Newman in good time, and will provide the supporting documentation. Please be patient.
And yes you raise very important questions and they will be answered, don’t worry. Relax.
https://anonfiles.com/file/cecf0c68817265cce388930dee7ae39a
Anonymous why would I or any investor want to prove themselves credible to anyone let alone trolls? What possible benefit is there in that? I am an investor and Jeremy Newman is once again trying to ruin my investment so it matters to me you arrogant fool.
TS the site you are looking for is https://anonfiles.com
But sadly we are not Jeremy. TS Harlequin won their court case, Hooray, Great Credit due to their legal teams, magnificent job. We are here dealing with issues which purchasers want dealt with, But we will deal with the issues you raise, we will. We will even produce the responses by Mr. Newman and Wilkins Kennedy provided to the courts in the UK the part 18 requests for everyone to see, just to keep you happy. But not just yet. Ok?
I have done my due diligence and seen proof of land ownership among other things so I am content and have no questions to answer.
Now I am going out for the night. I wonder if Jeremy will finally provide this website he promised, reveal his not so secret identity or answer any of the MANY questions left unanswered that Anon and others seem to fail to notice?
Jeremy Newman your credible group will use a dodgy anonymous file sharing website used by paedophiles? You total moron.
NOW I am going out.
TS we have lots of information about Ames and Harlequin which might affect how you view them with respect to your investment. TS Mr. Ames has everything under control, he is dealing with Mr. Newman and Mr. Mac Donald and Wilkins Kennedy, if you however have spare cash you could go after RLB, Mr. Picknel, Ridgeview Construction, Mr. Chapman etc. Plenty to go around.
You see even TS can’t defend the indefensible. I rest my case.
TS sorry we just found it odd that Mr. Ames lawyer would have a different version of events to Mr. Ames and we thought it would be of interest to purchasers, TS we wonder if you would be prepared to share the findings of your due diligence with others on this forum. It might help to calm every bodies frayed nerves.
The following might be of interest to purchasers in the Dominican Republic.
TS could you please confirm if these matters were ever addressed? Your journalist friend might be able to help. Its just that the CGI’s show properties on the water front and river front and this document tends to suggest that this is not allowed.
We assume Mr. Ames would have informed all those who have purchased Beach and River front properties that there was a problem.
This pertains to land in Las Canas and Two Rivers but not to the Hideaway
https://anonfiles.com/file/5e4b626f4d512816689ea195ee6390b2
https://anonfiles.com/file/fb005ee720405526f81c4d0ce61f2cb2
https://anonfiles.com/file/ddd296e5421a260397ef6b487b047ea1
@TS don’t forget your plastic glasses
Well Ralph Newman, you don’t know if I have title or not. There again your files only go back to when you were kicked out of Wilkins Kennedy. Not so up to date are you.
@leaky mole etc, if you think TS is Mattt Ames then you are certainly not in the bunker. Keel guessing.
Don’t bother asking FDNRM if he has title, as his last response implied. He won’t answer (and anyway he hasn’t)
FDNRM
Dear Bob please find an extract from a letter Mr. Ames’s in house legal team sent a prominent UK media organisation TV/Radio and Internet in March of this year, you will see from the extract that Mr. Ames’s legal team seem to have no problem with the copyright issues you have raised.
We will have no problem in passing the email along with the letter to Gwen Malone Stenographers should Mr. Ames or his in house legal team deem it necessary.
Maybe you could ask them if they would like to get our colleagues to do this.
https://anonfiles.com/file/eca47696299cc00eb302fd8c67bf7262
@Ralph Newman, then I suggest you pass it over. I have no intention of opening any site you suggest. Interesting that you suggest a letter was sent to the media in March, when the trial judgement was issued at the end of July. Why wait for my say so to talk to Gwen Malone, are you not capable of doing that yourselves? Perhaps O’Callahan solicitors in Cork might start a paper trail. As you know everything is traceable, even obscure websites.
By the way are you ready to defend the complaint to the Institute of Chartered Accountants regarding your conduct? You wont even be able to do an ironing companies accounts then.
Bob – Why don’t you look up the meaning of –sniveling– it
fits you like a glove……
Commissiong comes over as really shifty in the transcripts of day 14. He keeps avoiding questions and misunderstanding them. From the transcript that seems deliberate.
@FDNRM – if only you knew……. Bob
Well at least he did testify that no one other than Ames himself,
or BB has title to anything… sort of… then back tracked… sort of.
As if he did’nt know what the hell was going on.
TS we did not want you to feel left out so we have responded to your latest questions.
TS
August 17, 2013 at 6:13 pm
Q. What did Jeremy Newman do with the INVESTORS money he helped Paudie O’Halloran STEAL? Has any of it been used to create the struggling Kelltek Group?
A. According to the Irish Judgement and the expert witness appointed by Harlequin Grant Thornton it was spent on a house, a wedding, paying back his father, petrol in a garage and something in Tescos twice. Please refer to Judgement, Transcripts and Witness Statements Mr. Ames sent to a very prominent UK TV, Radio and Internet company.
Q. Why did Jeremy Newman wait until after the O’Halloran fraud and ceasing to work for Harlequin before saying anything about alleged wrong doings?
A. Well according to FDNRM Mr. Newman made his first report to the SFO in 2009, and who are we to doubt the veracity of FDNRM’s information. The name is Bond, Bob Bond.
Fatchett does not represent me.
August 15, 2013 at 4:18 pm
The SFO were asked on more than one occasion by Newman, dating back to I believe 2009 to investigate and at that stage declined. The pre investigation was started around Christmas time of this year but I cannot be sure of that date.
Q. Why did Jeremy Newman hide if he was doing the right thing?
A. Mr. Newman may have tried to hide but in documents and photos sent to a very prominent UK Based TV / Radio and Internet media organisation Mr. Ames knew where he was at all times, Just ask Mr. Simon Taylor or Mr. Neil Outrum both of Harlequin who know all about the surveillance.(according to the originals we have) As they say you can run but you cant hide, at least from Ames anyway given all that purchaser money he has.
https://anonfiles.com/file/5dbdc40eb91a40a8bd715d3923488ca7
Q. Why did Jeremy Newman have to resign in disgrace when he was uncovered?
A. He didn’t. Harlequin wrote to Wilkins Kennedy in June 2012, Mr. Newman did not resign until November 2012 and has since then attended a number of Wilkins Kennedy functions as Mr. Ames is aware of through his surveillance operations.
Q. Why did Jeremy Newman lie in court?
A. We cant find where he lied, Maybe if he lied he was just taking his lead from Harlequin. We doubt it though, Mr. Newman has integrity and morals.
Bob we are actually growing to like you, even if you have a few screws loose, you are bringing a smile to a lot of peoples faces in what is other wise a very serious topic. Keep up the good work.
Folks you think Commisiong was shifty, wait till you hear what the great POOBAH himself has to erm, sorry umm, ahh, duhh, say.
POOBAH; ” OI’m A VISIONARY MATE, everything else is Mac’s fault gov.”
POOBAH’s WIFE ” I am not sure, I know nothing about the Finances, Sales Figures, Turnover, how many kids I have, You will have to ask my husband my lord, My husband dealt with the business the 2% that was above board, Mac my Lord dealt with the rest the 98% all the illegal stuff.”
POOBAH’s SON
Judge; “How do you plead ”
Poohbah son; “Mac is guilty me lord.”
Ooh, I can’t WAIT to read Poobah’s stuff. It will be a jaw-dropping,cringe-fest.
@Ralf Newman, “what did he do with the investors money?” very selective answer. let me add, “Purchased a private jet, renting an expensive mansion in Sandy Lane, buying a racetrack in St Lucia, purchasing a quarry i SVG, a Hertz franchise in St Lucia.”
OOPS Jeremy you somehow let that slip your memory didn’t you. Wonder how a sharp tax planner like you could forget such details.
Don’t forget investors out there THIS WAS YOUR MONEY.
Ahh……..No Bob. Sorry mate. Nice try but no Court has yet made a determination on those matters.
And from what we have seen this past 24 hrs Mr. Ames has started playing Russian Roulette with everyone’s money..
Oh don’t worry we will demonstrate to every one including you Bob what a spineless coward Anes really is.
Bob – you’re talking like the Irish money was the lion’s share. It is nowhere close to what Ames has p*ssed up the wall. You know it, I know it and everyone else knows it.
Bob we know you might find it difficult to comprehend even the simplest of matters but maybe it is time that you comprehended that as a result of the Ames’s family inability to deal with purchasers funds yours included that the investments are all but lost.
Many have been clinging on to the hope that a rescue plan is in the offing. But from what RL have stated recently with respect to the lack of transparency and basic dishonesty demonstrated by the Ames family in RL’s discussions with them (granted RL may not have described it in exactly those words) and given the information coming to light with respect to Ames’s real nervousness as to the upcoming litigation ( and please Bob do not make an assumption that you know what we are talking about because even Ames has kept you out of the loop on this one) a rescue plan cannot and will not succeed.
What we can tell you is that the Harlequin Group is facing in excess of $300 million in civil actions.
Ah talking of pissing it up the wall – poor Bobbet 36/- didn’t even get an invite to that ONE MILLION POUND BASH AT THE GROVE in 2009. Nor did he get a freebie/discounted trip to BB in 2010 as so many of the other investors and IFAs enjoyed. Now there’s loyalty for you.
@ FDNMR do you think Paudie’s private jet is better than Ames’ two clapped out bangers languishing in a Caribbean hangar somewhere? All purchased with investors’ money BTW.
Ralph Newman, and your sidekick Anonymous, Lets face it lads you have been found out. I recon WK might just settle out of court to try and keep their reputation, but you matey are looking at a bad time coming up. Perhaps a little look into the land registry to see if you have transferred your house into your wifes name yet..Yes you are right I dont know as much about the defamation case as you, you are the defendant so you should know a bit about it. Still O’Halloran might let you take a walk around his racetrack or drive a Hertz rental car.
Laddie Pisshead2 Oh and for your information I did get an invite to the Grove. Tut Tut not up to date there, still what do you know. Nowt.
@Anon 9.15 isnt it hypocritical of you that you think DA “fraud” who by the way has not been convicted if anything is worse than O’hallorans fraud, who has been convicted. So Anon, do you think that O’Hallorans fraud was ok then?
Bob given your manic obsession with Jeremy Newman and the vicious nature of the attacks on his character which you seem resolute in maintaining, your absolute conviction that we are he. And your absolute belief that he will loose his defence of the defamation claim being brought against him by Harlequin. We ask you to consider the following. We do this because we genuinely are beginning to like you.
You are demonstrating that you have no clue as to what is really going on or as to the identities of the players involved.
You have no understanding of Mr. Newman’s role. He was neither engaged by Harlequin or the ICE group. Wilkins Kennedy were retained by both Harlequin and the ICE group albeit by two separate and distinct operating entities within Wilkins Kennedy. (Southend and Egham) Mr. Newman was not a partner he was an employee and was instructed to work with the ICE Group from September 2009 by his employers Wilkins Kennedy. He was also asked from time to time by the Southend Office to provide tax advice to Harlequin. Not detailed tax advice where Mr. Newman would have required sight of detailed financials but strategic tax advice based on a number of options being reviewed at the time by Harlequin and Wilkins Kennedy in Southend. On occasion Mr. Newman was asked to look at tax liabilities as they might pertain to specific purchasers. But of course Bob you would not be aware of any of this.
Despite no reference by the Judge in his judgement as to Mr. Newman’s guilt or even suggestion that Mr. Newman was complicit in any fraud, you and others supporting Harlequin remain vehemently resolute in your attacks on his character.
Yet despite the Judge being hugely critical of the Role Wilkins Kennedy played in the matter and the Judges stance that both Mr. MacDonald and RLB were complicit in the fraud, there is far less of an aggressive stance taken by you and others against Mr. MacDonald and absolutely no reference being made as to the involvement of RLB in the Fraud.
This possibly has more to do with the very deep pockets both RLB and Wilkins Kennedy have in which to mount a defence and possible counter action against Harlequin and the Ames family and anyone else brave enough to join in the fray.
Its also rather odd given the Judges ruling that Mr. MacDonald was complicit in the fraud, that he has not been suspended nor sacked by Wilkins Kennedy. RLB, Wilkins Kennedy and Martin MacDonald were not represented at the case.
The question is why weren’t they.
Or is the answer to that question dealt with by Mr. Ames himself in a letter we have seen sent by Harlequin to the BBC.
Much of the information you are being fed is probably coming from Carol Ames who has claimed in court that she is clueless as it pertains to any aspects of the Harlequin Business with the exception of the detailed knowledge she has as it pertains to the fraud and its complex nature, and we are not just talking about the fraud referred to in the Irish case.
We suspect you are also being fed information by other members of Harlequin including Mr. Ames.
Then there is a Walter Mitty side to your character in your suggestion that investigative agencies including the SFO have in some way imparted information to you as it pertains to their ongoing investigations into Harlequin. Your statement that Wilkins Kennedy was interviewed under Section 2 being just one example.
Now what if Mr.. Newman successfully defends his stance in the defamation case. Could he not instigate a legal action against you.?
When we make our identities known and we will. Would not Mr. Newman be justified in taking an action against you?
Do you honestly believe that Mr. and Mrs. Ames will pay your legal costs.Even though it is partly your money. On that note who’s money are they using in the numerous personal legal battles they are contesting currently? Some of which have nothing to do with the fraud case. Its not their money. Its partly yours.
Ironically in one case being taken by a number of purchasers against the Ames family personally, the Ames family is using purchaser funds to defend the action. And if the Ames family loose it would have been purchaser funds had there been any left that would have paid out the award.
This is not a threat just an observation.
See Bob there you go again lol half cocked.
Based on the evidence provided to the court the judge found against Mr. O Halloran and a judgement of 1.55 million euros has been made against him.
Much in the same way as if someone defaulted on their mortgage. The bank would foreclose and seek judgement against the owner on the balance owing.
It was a civil case not a criminal case.
However Mr. Ames and his companies are being investigated by a number of UK agencies. The “SERIOUS” Fraud Office. And the Essex Police amongst others. The word SERIOUS might give you a hint.
These investigations if they were to result in a conviction or if the Ames family were to he found ” GUILTY” in this case a judgement against them would be the least of their worries.
And Mr. and Mrs. Ames are also defendants in a number of civil actions in a number of multi jurisdictional cases were some of the causes of action against them include ” FRAUDULENT MISS REPRESENTATION”
The amounts being sought by purchasers in these actions are a wee bit greater than what Harlequin won in Ireland Yet amazingly there is little or no hype being generated by the Ames family with respect to these cases.
Maybe we can redress this obvious imbalance.
Bob we have to say your reasoned arguments are an absolute joy to read. It would be wrong of anyone to suggest that Bob was not assisting us all in getting a better understanding of this debacle. We can just see Carol Ames now as she stoops over the stove cooking those duck eggs. ” Dave can you get that idiot to shut up” All though we suspect she is as clueless as Bob lol. Keep up the great work Bob.
Lets not forget young Matt eh Bob.
Bobbet 36/- Do you think the 2-day £1 MILLION POUND JUNKET at the Grove was a reckless misuse of investors’ money?
PS So whose got the best plane then?
@Ralph Newman, Oh dear Jeremy, you are not very observant are you.
“Your statement that Wilkins Kennedy was interviewed under Section 2 being just one example.” No dumb ass I said that the SFO OBTAINED their files from WK under a section 2. Understand the difference?
“You have no understanding of Mr. Newman’s role. He was neither engaged by Harlequin or the ICE group”. Ups Jeremy another porker. From the court case: Mr. Jeremy Newman was retained to give tax advice to Harlequin. After some time, he became involved in giving advice to the ICE Group
I could disprove more of your previous rubbish post above, but I’m going to cut the lawn. I suggest you do the same while you still have a house.
And if you want to sue me Jeremy, bring it on. Enjoy looking at my Linkedin profile? That told you a lot didn’t it. LOL .
Laddie Pisshead2, how should I know. What to you think to “Ralph’s” lies printed above? Or are you bowing down to your computer screen chanting “I am unworthy”
Bob really is a desperate man. Time is running out on that special deal of his and he knows it. 3 months, 6 months? Maybe just long enough to tide him over until his basic state pension kicks in.
Cheers Bob we acknowledge that we were not totally sure what the SFO told you about Wilkins Kennedy so thank you for your clarification on the issue.
Jeez Bob was Jeremy in essence moonlighting. Wonder how much O Halloran was paying him. The engagement letter we have seen between Wilkins Kennedy and ICE Group must be a forgery so.? So must the court transcripts we have of Mr. Newman.?
Thats it folks Bob has uncovered another evil plot by Mr. Newman? to defame poor Mr.Ames.
We can just see Mrs. Bob now looking at Mr. Bob as he mows the lawn and thinking to her self. I married an idiot and now not only have we lost our life savings, but we could also loose the house.
Don’t worry Bob its apparent that whatever biological form existed in the upper regions of your body at sometime in the distant past appears long since to have vacated that region with the exception of some decaying vegetated mass which enables you to function albeit in a very delusional form.
Lol fill us in later on how you got on with the lawn.
So Ralf, I am totally sure what the SFO told me about WK. What makes you think I am not? More guess work.
So Jeremy, later today, when I have a bit more time, I am going to ask if I can be a follower of you now locked twitter account. Of course you could deny me access which would beg the question “what have you got to hide?” or you could let me join, in which case all you “followers” will be revealed. Wonder what it will be Jeremy?
@Anon 12.24 how funny your posts always follow Jeremy and vice versa. Just a tad obvious.
@ Bobbitty 36/-
Are you not remotely concerned just how profligate Dave Ames was with other people’s money? Taking into consideration your apoplectic rants and allegations about J Newman and the Blarneys, I find it hard to believe that your only reaction to Dave Ames squandered £1 million quid of investors’ money on a party is ‘how should I know[?]’.
Incidentally, talking of squandering money what happened to that scheduled air service between St Lucia and Puerto Rico for Harlequin’s growing number of US-based guests?
Who’s got the best plane? All paid for by investors’ money. And BTW no one gives a shit who you follow on Twitter?
Bob thanks for the clarification on what was told to you by the SFO.
Hi Ralf, tell me which address to send it to, Bray or Southend, I will send you the copy of the transcript.
@Pisshead2, why do you come on here. No one is remotely interested in your comments. How should I know? I never went. Any comment about a race course and Herz rental company? Just go away you add absolutely FA to this at all.
Roberta – waah, waah, waah – such a little girl!
@ Bob, don’t you think you have become obsessed, something you had a go at the Wigan bunker for?
36/- it’s quite simple a simple question. Do try not to circumvent it by asking another questions that is irrelevant to the discussion (like you usually do). It is such troll-like behaviour to do that you know. From your reluctance to comment I can only conclude that you condone Ames spending so much of the investors’ money on a party.
BTW you didn’t comment on the freebie and discounted trips to BBay taken by IFAs and investors did you? It all came out of investors’ funds.
And just so as you know Bobby, I have every right to be on this forum just as you do. And the reason I am here is none of your business.
Yes it is Pisshead, when you personally attack me If Im such a troll stop asking me inane stupid questions. Racetrack and Herz, right back at you!
@ Bobies Helmet
Still happy with your none title? Time to give up……… Ames won’t keep to your dirty little deal……. why would he when he done everyone else?
Just think about that – why you so so special?
Bob is special to Ames because he is so stupid. I mean really, really stupid. I imagine they regularly chuckle to themselves about how unquestioning he is and how easy he is to string along despite the barrage of contrary evidence.
I’m picturing him as Benny off Crossroads.
anon RU…at least Benny was honest and didnt defend fraudsters, so defo not like Benny
Bob you have been shafter by yr mate mr Ames and when you have to repay the money and sell up what y gonna do….with a bit of luck you will get a suspended sentance. mind you wopnt be able to work at macdonalds then as even they dont employ fraudsters
you all washed up mr fdnrm….lol
@Anon RU “benny” was a shakspearean trained actor! Nothing like making yourself look an idiot is there. Off to get in the hot tub.
Actually ‘Benny’ was a character in a soap. Paul Henry was the actor who played Benny. Nothing like making yourself look an idiot is there?
Don’t forget to put your i-pad into a watertight zip-loc bag….
you wouldn’t have a life without it…
It is a pointless exercise in engaging in intelligent debate with Bob FDNRM. He is obsessed with Mr. Newman and we suspect his relationship with the Ames family is the catalyst which drives him on.
However it must be remembered that Bob is an investor and along with the majority of purchasers can least afford to loose his investment. But these investments are lost. Purchasers will never receive interest payments again. Nor will they receive the 10% returns promised.
It is also time that Pat Cash, Gary Player, Andy Townsend and Liverpool Football Club questioned the wisdom of their apparent continued unequivocal support of the Ames Family.
The group is trading insolvently. The General Manager of “The Award Winning” Buccament Bay Resort as TS reminds us so often is not a successful hotelier. He is the former sales director of Harlequin who’s sales arm is now in administration. The company under investigation by the Essex Police and the SFO.
He has just received a 13 year ban from CIB in the UK and on bail awaiting trial for criminal fraud. Yet he is rubbing shoulders with “Sports Stars” at the Buccament Bay Resort.
And remember Phil Spencer, the so called TV property expert. He told the world what a great investment Harlequin was. He fully endorsed the product. Where is he now? What has he to say to the 1000’s of purchasers waiting to hear about how Ames won a court case in Ireland.
Andy Townsend who can be still seen endorsing the Harlequin product on the Harlequin Property Website.
Is Andy Townsend brain dead? Is he aware of the ongoing litigation. Is he aware that HMMSE is in Administration.
Is it not odd that none of the “superstars” appear as creditors on the HMSSE books and reports as produced by Shipleys.
Could we be seeing some Fraudulent Preference here. HMMSE stated that some of the money taken by that company was for marketing purposes.
Who pays the ” Superstars” ?
Shippleys have found that many of the management records of HMSSE are missing.
BDO found similar problems. But Harlequin knew this as far back as 2009. An attempt by Harlequin in 2009 to cover this up was exposed by the BBC and Mr. Chapman. In a response to the BBC Harlequin would make no comment on Project Orange stating that it was covered by legal privilege.
But project Orange included attempts by Harlequin to hide the double selling of properties.
In a scheme overseen by Simon Terry Harlequin changed the unit numbers at Buccament Bay in a bid to create confusion. If two people then had the same unit number Mr. Terry would respond by saying that it was a mistake. Or a typo error.
Carol Ames despite being the managing director of HMSSE the property sales arm for Harlequin could not state how many units were sold, how many purchasers there were nor indeed what the turnover of her companies was.
Our posts are hitting a raw nerve with the Ames family. We wonder why?
@ Pisshead2 that’s why the ” ” we’re there to emphasise that was not his real name. Got it? No very unlikely. Bit too obvious for you.
Ralphy boy, yes your right it is a pointless exercise you engaging in an intelligent conversation with me, the reason being you are far too thick. Funny how if the management records were missing WK top accountant and tax advisor did nothing about it. Now I don’t expect you to answer that as “it’s a pointless exercise engaging with me” good knob off then dumbo.
@fdnrm…I may be an idiot…but was smart enough not to invest in any of HP scams….now that must place me ahead of you in the brain cell department…hmm I also sleep soundly as they wont be any knock knock on my door by the police asking question about fraud and deceipt and deffo not needing to live on handouts from the crooked ames family…life is so good being an idiot….off to barbados tomorrow for a few weeks…. you never know you and the rest of the crooked ames maybe settling in at the hotel hmp Ames sewing mailbags
Bringing this back to the point of this thread (see the title) we are invited to discuss whether HP is a fit entity to manage the money that purchasers entrusted to them.
Yesterday at 1033 and 1136 I asked questions of TS and FDNRM and, despite multiple and off-topic posts by both of them since, neither of them has responded.
I will ask again.
Given that the court hearing revealed that HP failed in their most basic duty to purchasers in not providing the minimal benefit and security of a contract between themselves as developer and ICE as contractor, can you comment on this as an example of professional negligence?
If you deem it not to be professionally negligent then can you explain why?
@beggars belief, I will answer you when you post your full name, age, address and also your wife’s name. Just so long as we are on equal footing. Got that. Thank you. And while we are on the object of off topic posts, the majority have come from “Ralph” so why not have a go at him.
What’s beggars belief’s wife got to do with anything? you really are a cretin Bob.
Anon 5.13 because my wife’s name was put on here. Along with my mothers. Now who is the cretin?
It seems to me that Ralph is the only poster of ANY SUBSTANCE
(including myself) for the past several days…
@FDNRM: so because your wife and mother were named by someone on this forum you refuse to offer an opinion on whether or not HP is a fit entity to manage the money that purchasers entrusted to them until such time as Beggars Belief confirms his full name, age, address and also his wife’s name?
Interesting logic (some might even say infantile) but let’s run with it: Beggars Belief’s real name is Eugen Jan Boissevain and his wife is Edna St Vincent Millay. They live at 436 East Hill Road, Austerlitz, NY 12017
Over to you on the question of whether Mr Ames is a fit and proper person to manage investor’s money and whether he has done a good job in doing this far.
Bobby 36/-
And your point is…? Why should your wife or mother’s name prevent you from agreeing whether Dave Ames was profligate with other people’s money and was incompetent when he failed to insist on a written contract before entering into business with the Irish lot?
And weren’t you threatening to publish someone’s financial details only this morning? Here is your quote just to remind you…
“but you matey are looking at a bad time coming up. Perhaps a little look into the land registry to see if you have transferred your house into your wifes name yet..”
To – Bobby
His candle already burned at both ends
It did not last the night
But oh his foes, and ah his friends
It went out with no hope of respite
(with apologies to ESVM)
Really cool middle name though…
And what if I have a husband?
@Anon/pisshead2 the stakes have been raised by putting anyone’s personal details on here, which was started by Ralph Newman. Thought he would do it to try and intimidate me. It hasn’t worked. And Pisshead, a little look is not the same as publishing is it. Or is that too difficult for you. If you are going to publish something get it right. Idiot. Also Anon, how do you know Beggars Belief?
Your mate Anon has just given your wife’s name. Come on get your acts together. The new dumb and dumber
You’re really not making a lot of sense tonight 36/-
Anon at 6.07 pm – very good! Entirely lost on the simple minded one of course!
Anon at 5.39 pm
@FDNRM
Where is your mate WTF aka Richard Ingram – so the police finally shut him up?
Anon 5.39 6.07
Stoppit! I’ve spit my coffee now.
I wonder why Beggars Belief would be married to a dead poet? You can choke on your coffee now!
Nah nah na nana!
Who cares about FDNRM or What’s the fuss – who cares who was stupid enough to marry them , live with them ,have offspring with them ( yuck ) THe facts are the facts Ames stole the money from the investors ,Ames spent purchasers deposits to fund legal claims, AMes lied ,cheated, stole ,abused ,deceived everyone He paid top flight law firms to advise him how to stay out of jail full in the knowledge what he was doing was illegal -PROJECT ORANGE-
He employed other lawyers to issue threats and writs – again with purchasers money . EVERYTHING HAS BEEN DONE ON OUR MONEY BECAUSE HE HAS NO OTHER INCOME …….
I don’t give a monkeys who , if anyone ripped AMes off – I paid AMES , he owes me .
Tell me Bob how come you get paid without a title deed on your property.
Carpe diem…..
Fuck off Haney don’t talk about my wife and kids like that!!! EVER.
Go and fuck yourself wankshaft …… You can give it but you can’t take it ……
Except up the arse from Ames ……. Oh harder Dave more jism my love … Let me be your servant Dave ……….
Anyone who has a dirty little deal with Ames – don’t panick I am alive and well, I don’t post on here anymore although a couple of posts have been put up in my name. No the police haven’t stopped anything apart from Ericas forum. I don’t post on the subject of Harlequin as I have no interests in it anymore although I not divulging why!
Richard Hannay – nice try at filthy insults but your a bit of an amateur at it aren’t you – need some help? I can only imagine you feel safe talking about people’s wives and children because you don’t have family? You seem married to your fist because you can’t get a girlfriend and are seedless so have no children?
Try calling Erica she can’t be inundated with male attention and she also might be able to supply you with some pictures of kids to look at?
FDNRM, now that’s being a little bit rude, have you had too many boxes of Aldi wine?
@Ralph,
How very interesting your information is, I trust its been given to the proper authorities?
Why are some of the posters on here so preoccupied with Erica, masturbation and pedophilia? It is most unnatural.
@WTF!!!
So your dirty little deal has happened, or was it Dave Ames that actually told you to stop being such a prat?
Anyhow, you do know that your dirty little deal will be overturned – preferential creditor spring to mind 😉
Shipley’s know about you and FDNRM – so your both up the creek without a paddle.
Leaky Squeaky Arse – if you were anybody of any relevance you would know, but it’s not your business to know.
Don’t worry about what I’m doing, Shipleys are only relevant to one harlequin business not all of them – amazing what a bit of lateral thinking can do.
As I have told you now at least half a dozen times – DA has never asked for anything to be posted or not posted.
Anyway I’m in the office Wednesday come and ask me and I will give you an update seeing as your not in the loop!
I’m stopping posting again now so don’t bother asking anymore questions.
The topic of this forum is
“Harlequin wins lawsuit against Padraig O’Halloran by proving Dave Ames is unfit to manage your money”
In order to prove that Dave Ames and indeed the Ames family were unfit to manage purchasers money it is necessary for everyone to understand how the business model was conceived the historical issues pertaining to Harlequin, the roles of accountants, lawyers, contractors, employees, purchasers etc.
The Ames family have been since 2007 blaming everyone and anyone for their short comings. When criticism of their business model was raised on various blog sites and online Harlequin spent fortunes removing criticism.
When the Guardian wrote an article about Harlequin and their Merricks resort in 2009, Harlequin threatened to sue them. Today 18 August 2013 nearly 4 years later three partly finished buildings are all that have been constructed on site.
Harlequin blamed their first contractor for fraud and miss appropriation and then just going on the facts of the Irish case blamed their 2nd contractor for exactly the same thing. What lessons did Harlequin learn from their first contractor? Apparently none.
What safe guards did they put in place? Apparently none.
And what of the much talked about rescue plan, The Harlequin Investment Group, (Mr. Garret Factchett, Mr. Paul Walton, Mr. Richard Ingham) What’s their role in all this, What is their relationship with Harlequin, their relationship with Mr. David Campion the former Director of the HD studio. A rescue plan which has been discussed for months yet with little or nothing of substance being produced. Allegations by Regulatory Legal that they have received conflicting information from Mr. Ames. Incessant attacks by Mr. Ames on Mr. Fatchett. How can anyone have confidence in any rescue plan when this continues in the background?
Is Ames using the ruse of a rescue plan to stall for time?
Why did Mr. James Canon and 11 Capital walk away, How many walked previous to this?
What happened the Harlequin Investment Fund?
These are the issues which purchasers want to know about, people want to know what they can do, not live on eternal promises that someday all will be good. Harlequin talk about transparency, to date there has been none.
We hope over the next few weeks to shed light on many of the issues of concern to purchasers and interested parties alike.
WTF has stated that Shipleys are only relevant to one Harlequin business not all of them, These are the kind of statements that are both inaccurate and may well be designed to miss lead purchasers.
The actions of Shipleys and the future of HMSSE and or any possible CVA will have huge ramifications on the Resort Development Companies, (The Caribbean Companies)
We will explain this in detail this week.
Mampy, mampy crab if we were betting people we would bet that anyone with an interest in Harlequin will be reading this blog. Including the Ames family and their in house solicitors. Harlequin have in the past published letters on Barbados Free Press and we would like them to consider doing so again in the interests of transparency. Many of the issues we raise could be addressed by Harlequin and the Ames family.
We are not seeking a reaction from the Ames family or a release explaining to all and sundry that they know who is behind “Ralph” because they don’t.
Harlequin will attempt to milk the Irish Judgement for all its worth in an attempt to lay blame for their complete incompetency at the door of someone else.
Harlequin and the Ames family sent press releases to a large number of organisations in which they continued pedal their litany of lies. But they have rubbed up too many people the wrong way, they are now trying to weasel their way out of a number of situations they have created.
There is no future in Harlequin, no magical solution, Harlequin are paying Pat Cash and other sports stars to maintain an illusion that all is well.
But it is not.
It is established in the judgment that Martin MacDonald of Wilkins Kennedy was Dave Ames right hand man and chief financial officer and he advised against a contract.
Jeremy “Harlecon” Newman is still banging on and spreading lies I see. What a sad weasel of a man.
It is already 1-0 to Harlequin and it will be very entertaining when the defamation court case arrives.
@ralph – how do I contact you for more information pls?
Yes Ralph how DO we contact you?
Come along Ralph no need to hide. Help your fellow anonymous poster.
Be that as it may TS, this is no real way of defending the professionalism of HP.
Correct me if I’m wrong but “Mac” was not an employee of any Harlequin company. So, as such, the purchaser’s had no contractual relationship with the company he worked for. If HP decided to entrust him to make decisions on their behalf then they have to stand by that and take responsibility for anything he did. The directors and the shadow director of HP can’t abrogate their duty of care to the purchaser’s.
Is it your position that they acted professionally in this respect?
Give it up beggars belief ……. You cannot get TS or FDNRM to accept even the tiniest bit of doubt about the messiah ( Ames) they cannot do anything but tow the party line ….
Ohallorans 1.5 million quid judgement is their great white hope, no mention of all the lost cases HArlequin have fought , just the one winner and a least four lost cases .
This forum in pointless apart from Ralph who seems to have insider knowledge and a lot more bombs to drop
BB it is standard practice and professional to seek and act upon advice by trusted expert advisers. The judgment makes it clear how pivotal Mac was at Harlequin.
“76. Again and again, throughout this lengthy trial, evidence was produced which showed what a pivotal role Mac played in the day-to-day business of Harlequin. What also emerged in the course of the trial was the growing relationship that developed between Mr. Padraig O’Halloran and Mac. It developed to such a point that Mac attended the stag party of the first named defendant at Monte Carlo during the Grand Prix weekend in 2010. Although Mr. Newman gave evidence in the trial, Mr. MacDonald did not. He neither turned up at the trial nor furnished a witness statement.
“77. I am satisfied that the evidence establishes that by the spring of 2010, Mr. MacDonald was working in league with the first named defendant and he had a serious conflict of interest in continuing to act for Harlequin. Mr. Ames felt very let down by Mr. MacDonald, and with some justification. By that time, Mr. Newman was also working for the ICE Group.”
I have nothing else to add and I am too excited by the prospect of “Ralph” helping the masses and providing contact details.
To repeat I am not here to answer for my investment so I will not be going into any further questions. I want to ensure everybody reading knows that Ralph is Jeremy Newman and that he is the real threat to investors.
Hello Richard! Firstly I want to apologise for my outburst last after you crass comment regarding my wife and children, however I am about to book a holiday for two weeks and I want to thank you for paying for it. God bless you for your generosity. Xx
Anyone who wishes to contact us can do so on Theequaliser101@gmail.com
Regards the Ralph team.
@36 Hmm… Buccament Bay at the hight of the mosquito season – that’ll be fun!
Better alert the catering staff to get the pies in.
Off to France.
@ EL2 – you mean boxes of wine ‘n’ fish’ n’ chips 😉
@FDNRM will we have a break from YOU!
TS We must not forget the role that RLB ( Rider Levett Bucknall http://www.rlb.com played in the FRAUD either. Tempering with documents as the Judge stated.
In the interests of purchasers and UK Taxpayers we have prepared a document to be sent to RLB (Rider Levett Bucknall http://www.rlb.com ) the Institute of Chartered Surveyors, the UK Governments Contract procurement Agency and the trade media setting out Harlequin’s concerns and indeed the very reliable witness evidence of Mr. Garret Ronan former VP for development at Harlequin Hotels and Resorts and the Judgement from the Irish case.
We will also provide the evidence that Harlequin claimed RLB had taken bribes.
RLB are involved in a number of UK government contracts including the MOD. It will be of huge importance to the UK government to be informed of the role RLB played in the fraud.
And we know how much Mr. and Mrs. Ames crave that justice is seen to be done.
We know Harlequin and the Ames family have been too busy dealing with Wilkins Kennedy to get the information on RLB to those who should know about their involvement in the fraud.
We will assist Harlequin on the matter of RLB knowing how busy they must be.
We thank Mr. Garret Ronan now employed by the Zuma chain of Restaraunts in New York for this information and his evidence in the Irish Court which led to the exposing of the business ethics of RLB.
La France recoit la douleur nous recevons l’augmentation
I see that even The Chief Troll and a major protagonist for Harlequin prefers to visit France rather than Buccament Bay. Says a lot.
However I do have a feeling that 36’s vacances d’été may be a ‘tarte dans le ciel’.
Ames told Bob “Go to France!”
@Pisshead2, only because Hannay has not paid enough to HP. Come on Richard stop being so tight man.
Another post that makes sense only in the twisted mind of Bobby
@2:27
Hey Paudie, You’re right! Ames is a scumbag… I should know…
@FDNRM
Ask your mate fatty Matty for a sub, he won’t need it in prison
nothing has changed here. please add value if you have new information. posted weeks ago that Eleven Capital was out. all i see here is moronic gibberish and accusations with nothing to show regarding resolution of the investors money, disclosure of Harlequin’s books, a real plan toward a solution for people to get their money back. why not just stay off this blog unless you can say something of value or that is at least sensible in an adult way? please post information of value to help find a solution or just stay off the blog.
Well done to Dave Ames and his legal team in the Irish High Court. Now for Newman and Wilkins Kennedy. Easy Easy! As soon as the SFO complete their investigations,finding as they will, that Harlequin has no case to answer, funding will materialise and the blocked projects will be up and running again.
B Baywatch Regarding the claptrap over the Hyatt investment. why no mention of neocolonialism, leakage etc.
Yatinkiteasy Any thoughts as to why Hyatt is investing in the DR, Mexico and Jamaica ans not Barbados? As we all know, there is an ever increasing number of boarded up hotels and resorts awaiting foreign investment. This following on from Sandals rejecting Barbados in favour of Greneda. Could this be another example of the rudeness and the widespread drugs and crime scene. not to mention the high level of HIV which infests your island, taking it’s toll? Come on, smart arse. let’s have some answers!
Before your Government spends money on refurbishing any hotel, they should look into the real reason behind the sad decline in tourism. they need to take positive action to clean up and re-educate your community and make Barbados a welcoming and safe place for your paying guests to visit once more. Are the authorities there so blind?
FDNRM is working tirelessly to protect his investment. Good for him! He has paid for his unit in full so why should he not receive a return?
There is a continuation of the same old waffle on this thread, with no interesting news, good or bad, Most, if not all, of what is posted is crap with no substance or truth behind it.
If there was any substance behind the suggestion of Double Selling any unit, the SFO would surely have found it. Did Fatchet find any proof in his survey that double selling was taking place? No!
Beggars Belief You are just one Almighty Liar.
Others, in particular B Baywatch, Yatinkiteasy and Eddie Lizzard 2 all post garbage. Remember Eddie Lizzard 2 was the one who threatened to kill Dave Ames at the investor meeting in Warrington,
As for you, Ralph Newman, you are the biggest pillock one could ever come across! Your would be far better spending your time planning on how you are going to pay your libel costs and the court costs. And how will you manage to keep a roof over your head? I can’t wait to see your face when you finally realise YOUR life is in ruins! Your actions on Harlecon have ruined so many other people’s lives. You will be held accountable. Don;t think you will get off lightly!
When is construction due to recommence?
Well done for trying your best to defend this but you have no idea how ridiculous you sound.
Let’s work with your assumption that directors at HP were persuaded to not protect the purchaser funds with a written contract with the contractor. Just how would you judge their business intuition and skill to accept that advice?
It really is below the most basic level of business competence to follow advice of this kind.
Can we even begin to join the dots on this one? Can we speculate how the line of reasoning might go that would support advice like this?
It is quite ludicrous to suggest that a director acting with full control of his or her faculties would be persuaded that this was a good course of action. And you know this to be true TS.
Lets be thankful that the contractor didn’t tell them that RSJs would not be required because they were going to use a new model of skyhook instead.
I would ask the same question to FDNRM but I’m worried he might ask me for my chest size and the name of my gerbil before he considers replying
@beggars belief, how’s your dead wife, the 20th century poet? Some people on here try to be so cleaver, but in reality are so stupid and fly up their own arse holes.
@NTPNNT
Thanks for at least giving my name capital letters. Can you point out a single lie I have added to this thread?
@FDNRM
Cleaver – a sharp knife usually used for cutting meat.
Clever – could be used to describe a person who is too intelligent to use the word “cleaver” when he really means “clever”
Good to see that there is someone else out there apart from Bob, TS and WTF who still believe in Ames’s hairbrained scheme! Comical post, joker! Bob, enjoy your holiday with our money, good to see the ponzi scheme is alive and kicking for some. That’s it, keep shouting from the roof tops how Ames’s ponzi scheme is benefiting some when clearly it’s ruining the lives of others. Oh, and what happened to the interest rate deposits which were meant to start this month? Looking like yet another lie from Ames. # SCUMBAG
@take Ames and fire. Since my personal details were posted on here by “Ralph” Newman and my wife and kids were insulted I don’t give a shit about losers like you. Tough shit loser.
@bb ah bless the spelling police. Clever is some one who makes an investment and makes a return. If you spent less time checking people’s spelling that might have been you.
Some excellent informative posts by Harlequin Supporters. Just a simple question then when is Harlequin ready to recommence work on all their projects.
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Ames,
You have some very loyal and die hard supporters on this site. They are making very many statements about your business and the future. But like us they all remain anonymous.
Now we are fully aware of the update you provided guests and purchasers staying at Buccament Bay Resort last week all 62 of them. (Equating to less than 25% occupancy) that work is to start in earnest on the Buccament Bay Resort in October.
We and we believe your purchasers would like from you an update.
Are you prepared to put into writing what you stated at Buccament Bay last week.?
Are you prepared to state whether you intend to take legal action against RLB.?
Are you prepared to confirm what your supporters are saying on this forum?
Can you give us an update on the defamation proceedings, are there any delays to this case? Is it still going ahead this year?
Are there still freezing orders on your wife’s assets? If so why?
Are you and your wife willing to make a statement on the decision by the UK authorities to ban your son for 13 years?
Are you still in good faith negotiations with Garret Fatchett of RL on a rescue plan?
How many units are available to hand over as part of your completion process?
Can you confirm that you received in excess of 200 completions to date at Buccament Bay. Those being in 2008 and 2009.?
Can you confirm that the Baker Jones Partnership was an independent accountancy firm engaged by BDO to have a look at your Caribbean transfers.?
Can you confirm that the Adela Chalmers who holds a senior management position in the James Baker Partnership and is a director of companies in the James Baker Group is NOT the same Adela Chalmers employed by your wife’s company HMSSE as a senior accountant or CFO prior to the appointment of James Baker Partnership?
if Adela Chalmers was employed by your company did you or your wife not think this might have been a conflict of interest?
Can you confirm that the work completed by the James Baker Partnership only went up to the 31st of March 2009?
Are you willing to admit you were wrong in stating to purchasers in the past that the James Baker Partnership had carried an audit of the figures?
In the Irish Court Case and as per the transcripts the work carried out by James Baker was merely a cataloguing exercise.
You have stated that Mr. Baker of the James Baker Partnership confirmed that 30 million sterling was owed by purchasers to your companies for completions on the Buccament Bay Project.
Can you confirm how Mr. Baker calculated these figures?
Can you confirm whether you made Mr. Baker aware of the completion monies received in the period 2007-2009?
Can you explain why Mr. Baker has stated that this was not an audit and Mr. Bakers team relied on Harlequin to provide the financial data (figures) to Mr. Bakers company.?
Can you explain why during Project Orange you changed the numbering on the Cabanas at Buccament Bay.
Can you confirm the number of units completed on and to which title was transferred as of Feb 2013.?
Can you explain to your purchasers why a CVA as it pertains to HMSSE will have no impact nor could any resultant actions as a consequence of a CVA affect purchasers in any way?
Can you explain to your purchasers why your wife claimed she knew absolutely nothing about the operation of her company as she set out in the Irish Court Transcripts?
Mrs Ames why did you knowingly sign off on your companies audited accounts when you knew you had no idea as to the finances?
In answering these questions we feel you both might go somewhere to regaining some credibility.
Correction in our letter at one point we make reference to Baker Jones Partnership. It should read James Baker Partnership. Jones Baker are referred to in the transcripts but they are a different firm. This is what happens when we have a late lunch. We also made reference to the freezing orders on Carol Ames’s assets we forgot to include the
Freezing orders on Dave Ames’s assets too.
Again apologies.
One of our colleagues has correctly pointed out that we got the name of the company mixed up.
Apologies again folks The companies name is Baker Clarke.
Sorry folks
You can find them on bakerclarke dot com
It must be all those rotis and banks in this heat. Phew
You seem to have just confirmed that you (at least one of you),
is based in Barbados. To me a very positive development. It means
some in the islands are making probing questions. Bravo!
The ROI on my investments is very healthy indeed and show every sign of providing great capital and income growth.
I think you said, FDNRM, that you made multiple purchases of units from HP and you consolidated these in exchange for completion on a single Buccament Bay unit. Correct me if I’m wrong.
Can you remind us the total amount you paid for all your deposits and then give us an idea of the percentage return you are currently receiving?
But he still hasn’t got a title deed have you FDNRM ????? Just get a few quid each month from your bum chum like a good little troll
First class questions Ralph , has Ames junior got his flight home yet ?………..
Na though not ……..
@BB, send Ralph an e mail and ask him, he seems to know everything, not.
@Anon 7.59 you and Ralph are so obviously the same. Just too obvious.
@RH iv got more than you have matey. A lot lot more.
FDNRM Do you know a Bob Ladell? Or Richard Ingham? Apologies if we spelt that wrong. We are not too good with names this afternoon.
When are you off on your holidays. France is great. Roll Mops, Oysters. Un baguette et deux croisant sil vous plait. Did we get that right Bob?
NTPNNTO Are you a dentist per chance? Thank you for your very informative post. We wonder if you might like to add some substance to support your claims that all is well with Harlequin.
Anonymous we cant be in Barbados the Dentist and Le Bob think we are Jeremy and living in a neighbours house in Bray.
And apparently what the dentist and Le Nob sorry Le Bob say must be true because well because because they say it is ok…. OK EVERYONE . We is/are Jeremy Oldman no Knewman and We is/are/was lying and as Bob says We is/are/have lost our “DEFORMATION” case and we is so sorry for “DEFORMING” Mrs Ameless & Mr. Ameless and the Ameless kids.
Too much Mount Gay doing the rounds today. Its one of the teams birthdays and we are celebrating.
@newman the pollock……good idea to avoid using your “Harlisuccess ” title after making such a jackass of yourself in past posts. You sound like an old record stuck in a groove .
Ralph this is Anon 7:59 Mt Gay, roti and Banks ye gods man!
Anyway after this Ponzi wraps up hope one day to meet-up.
@FDNRM/sportingman/36/bobthenob etc.. Ha,ha loser? Last time we had a sparring match I exposed you for posting under BBaywatch’s username, remember? That would make me a winner in my book, still bitter old timer? I’ve been following the posts closely and there’s only been one loser this week. You’ve suffered an absoloute drubbing I’m afraid. Maybe that’s why you fancy a holiday, when do you go? Good work Ralph, keep the info coming.
I think Ralph is being a bit of a tease by throwing in a few names that might suggest that he is in Barbados when he is not. I could just as easily say that I am off for a Chefette or a burger at Bubbas – does not mean that I am actually in Barbados, only that I have visited at some time in the past.
Bob shows all the hallmarks of a classic cult victim, completely brainwashed and unable to comprehend the realities of life outside the rigid dogma perpetuated by the cult leader. Cult leaders pray on the vulnerable, the weak minded, malleable members of society: life’s losers you might say. I know it’s difficult not to despise Mr Storey but we should resist this natural tendency for as another, altogether more articulate Bob pointed out, it ain’t him to blame, he’s only a pawn in the game.
@taaf, taking a drubbing, I think not. Who is paying for my holiday? Sad losers.
TDNRM – Duh..Could it be the HD investors! When “clawback”
time comes I hope the holiday was worth it.
Heh Bob how many other people own the same unit as you. As in how many people or who else also owns your unit? Lol
We have waited all day for you to email us and TS, cmon guys you asked us for our contact details and we gave them to you.
You guys know how this works. We give you our contact details. You call Simon Terry, he then proceeds to get some one to email us with information (false of course) pertaining to Harlequin. We respond. Bob Ladell kicks into action, installing illegal wire taps and traces. Spends months in the Chinese Cyberspace, all the time showing Ames all these flashing lights and alarms. Ames pays.
Ameless and his wife claim they cant start any work because of the endless attacks being mounted against them on the BFP website.
Simon Terry keeps offering the guys in BFP inducements to pass on our IP address. Eventually offering them 2000 units at the Marquis Estate in Exchange for the IP address.
They still refuse. Simon Terry frantically calls all of Amelesses brain dead idiot supporters. TS Bob FDNRM the Dentist guy, 36, 99, etc etc Even the guys looking after the Oranges.
They mount their coordinated blog attack. It gets frenzied, they blog each other, Jesus, God, Santa, Micky Mouse, they google earth anything, they post it. It becomes manic. They run out of intelligent words. They look at their own naked bodies in the shower it inspires them to blog on. They find new words, flab, cock, pussy, dickhead, dike, she male, “DEFORMATION” fatass etc. A new Dialect begins to emerge.
They finish everything with words like “fuck off, or ha ha, or you will see, or you will have nothing left, or you can swivel.
The madness begins to set in. They respond for example by stating that they will not engage in conversations with fellow bloggers but continue to engage by claiming that they are not engaging. They then come on the various sites to tell us that they only came on to tell us that they are leaving. They do this continuously.
Ghent and the window licking moron Simon Taylor mount the surveillance operation. Simon Terry acts all important having assumed the role of Cater Ruck given that ELS are kind of all no winned no feed out.
Then one day we drop the ball. The alarm panel lights up like a Christmas tree. The fireworks go off over Blue Bell wood. The ducks , chickens and swans go wild. The Ameless family scream from the rooftops, they send communique’s out to everyone.
Taylor mounts Ghent, Ghent tells Walton and Ingham he can wrestle control of the business from Ames. Fatshit makes love to Ameless, Ameless has an affair with all the directors of Tailor made. Fatshit although hurt forgives Ameless , Ameless continues with his affairs. Fatshit looses his mind. Terry wets his pants with excitement then mounts some Welsh dude.
Of course we are accused of “Deforming” all of the above.
Then they find new life in their blogs. They engage in intelligent debate on the issues pertaining to the upcoming “DEFORMATION” action. They use words like looser, moron, fraudster, your going to loose everything. Again they attack anyone they can.
All this time Ameless blames everything on the “deformation” case and nothing gets built and it goes on and on and on an………….
Ralphy Baby – you are losing it, go and have a lie down!
Ralphy Baby – loving your satirical commentary. Nobody does it better.
Ralphy Newman, plot and lost come to mind here. If you weren’t such a toss pot I might even feel sorry for you. Go to bed, think about how long you and MacDonald will still have a house to live in. I would send you a post card but I don’t know where the nearest squat is to Bray. Just like Harlecon, ramblings of a madman.
Its time we had a break. This party is getting out of hand.
We have had a lovely Le diner with a glass or two of Pastis followed by the Hors d’ oeuvre consisting of Bisque Potage followed by the Plat principal of Pot au feu and a Baguette washed down with copious amounts of Chardonnay we finished with a platter of Bucheron, Delice de Bougogne and Olivet Cendre most of us passed on indulging in the Patisserie but two of our colleagues shared a Mille Feuille. Most of us partook in a digestif Pineau des Charentes, one or two indulged in a glass of Courvoisier Cour Imperiale Grand.
Ralph’s Newman, just to reiterate on your ramblings, my post of the 16th August 3.58 clearly uses the word Defamation, so your rantings above are, as usual, full of bullshit. And anyone who sits in a restaurant and writes long, meaningless, posts as per above must be really boring company. A typical accountant.
Bob We thought you might like to know a little secret. Shhhhhhh dont tell anyone ok Bob, Promise, It’s between us guys, well us homo sapiens and you. Promise us you will not share this with your fellow Neanderthals.
Do you promise us? Good boy. You can be a very good boy when you want to be. Well see its about the “Deformation” case. Its not going to happen.
See Bob and we promise we will not tell anyone else this. The problem is ….. We know we have gone along with you and it is wrong of us because see you are very special. Even Uncle Ameless acknowledged that by giving you a little pocket money on a quarterly basis. But he ……. see Bob he did not want anyone to know because see he was using other people’s money. Not his money pet. It wasn’t his money.
But the big secret Bob, promise now not to tell anyone. There’s a good little boy. See Bob there is going to be no ” Deformation” case. Nope none at all. Cause see there is no such thing as “Deformation” when it comes to say bad things about uncle Ameless.
Now before those horrible people on this site attack you for your spellings you just remember you are a good boy. Special yes but good. Ok ? Ok good boy.
Now we have another little secret or two for you. Promise this is between us and you will not tell your Neanderthal friends later. Promise us? Ok good boy. You really are a good boy. You really are. Ok you know the thing Uncle Ameless talks about all the time, the Defamation thingy. We know its a big word. Try say DEF …… A …….Mation . Great boy. Very good, Well see Uncle Ameless does not want to deal with it this year. So its not going to happen this year.
In fact he does not want to deal with it all. You know that horrible man Mac Donald and his friend Mr. Wilkins. The people we told you about who drive along and ask good boys like you to get in the car beside them for a sweet. Yeah those guys. Well they have lots of horrible made up stuff on Uncle Ameless and they have it in big boxes, yeah much bigger then the sweetie boxes you get at Christmas from Santa.
And the stuff in the boxes will make Auntie Ameless cry and you know they are sad now because baby Matt had to runaway.
Some people had big boxes like the horrible Mr. Wilkins. So baby Matt had to runaway.
So to stop Auntie Ameless from crying more he asked Mr. Wilkins to leave him alone, yeah like a secret meeting. Thats why the Def ……A……Mation thingy will not happen this year.
Now good boy go to bed now. And remember what Uncle Ameless thought you to do. Yeah that’s it count those completions and you will be asleep in no time. Good boy. You are such a good boy. A very special good boy.
Whilst we have had our fun tonight. We need to revert back to the very serious business of Harlequin.
We are not Mr. Newman but regardless FDNRM continues his mindless attacks on Mr. Newman. FDNRM can if he so wishes maintain his mindless attacks but it will not divert us from the task at hand.
Some of his fellow contributors have probably twigged that there is more to this then meets the eye now and have kept a low profile. Many lives are being ruined by the actions of the Ames family and many more lives will be destroyed before this all ends.
But end it will. We have begun to demonstrate how a rescue plan cannot work without the consent of 100% of the purchasers. Other contributors have demonstrated how the projects may fail regardless. And they make very good points.
We have no solutions for anyone. To be honest there are no solutions. The situation is as far as we can ascertain hopeless.
But we will provide the information that we have to see if anyone else out there may have a different view or a solution to the problem.
This site now bothers Ames and one has to wonder why? Ames knows we have too much information on him and his business activities. His arrogance has led to new sources turning up everyday to feed information. We here are working tirelessly to examine the veracity of all information we are receiving.
We will make the information public. We will make the transcripts public. The witness statements and all the documents that Ames himself wanted to make public.
We will also make the management accounts public. The accounts Ames does not want you to see.
The court documents from other cases. We will show how Ames fights a dirty fight. We will advise you the best places as we see it take action against Ames to try and recover your money.
We will do all we can to give purchasers a fighting chance.
This is far more then Ames will or can do for you.
But it will be up to purchasers themselves to make the final tough decisions.
The Ames family through their own actions have destroyed the dreams and ambitions of the purchasers. They cling onto power through lies and deceit. Mr. Fatchett might not use the same words as we do in describing the Ames family. TS described some as SCUM. It is the Ames Family who are worse then scum. Mr. Fatchett would certainly have to concede that the sooner the Ames family are removed from the equation the better.
Capital 11 minus the 4th degree.
Please explain the riddle.
thanks Ralph
@Ralph Newman, now keep this very quiet, I don’t want anyone else to read this because I think that you are not a bad person, just somewhat deranged. You obviously are part of the care in the community scheme because you have a problem with spelling other posters words. Let me help you. My post of August 16 3.58 uses the word DEF. A. MATION. Got it ? Good boy Ralph. Have a new calculator as a prize, oh sorry you won’t need one soon.
@ Yakintiteasy, you once had a moan about the thread clogging on this site. It doesn’t get any better than this does it?
Why are you so concerned with minor details Bobbitt? The whole ship is about to blow up, thousands of people are about to lose everything and you argue with someone over whether you spelled defamation correctly. You are such a boring old pedant.
Why would Bobby want to post personal details about his family’s holiday on Barbados Free Press?
I wonder if Bob/-36/FDNRM/Sportman is going to reinvent himself when he is ‘en France’? After the drubbing he’s got on here he’s in dire need of a name-change and a new personality.
Also, I wonder if Bobby is going to continue claiming his JSA when he is ‘away’? Or is he going to keep ‘schtum’ and not own up to the fact that he not available for work.
FDNRM there is not going to be a defamation “deformation” case.
@ Laddie Pisshead2 there is on ly one set of ramblings on here, “Ralph” posting at 1.30 in the morning. Funny how you don’t comment on the rantings of an idiot. I mentioned my holiday to France because all my followers, like you, who cannot stop posting about me, will want to know where I am. If I didn’t tell you Pisshead you would only fret now wouldn’t you.
Ralph you are up, after your marathon posting session to 1.30 last night. Not able to sleep? Too much on your mind? Been on my Linkedin profile recently. You little stalker you. Do you want me to tell you where I will be in France. Don’t want you fretting also do we.
TL;DR
Jeremy “Ralph” Newman is not the best at keeping his messages focused and to the point. It was exactly the same on Harlecon.
A question for you “Ralph”. Why did you Jeremy Newman help Paudie O’Halloran steal from Harlequin?
Bob , just fecking go to France your getting right up me crapper now !!!!!!
Sorry Richard thought you want to know about it, after all you are paying for it.
https://www.duedil.com/company/OC386269/pro-harlequin-investors-llp
Read ’em and weep…
TS please enlighten us as to why you think Jeremy Newman helped Mr. O Halloran steal from Harlequin.
Then TS you might direct the readers to any part of the Judgement or transcripts which demonstrate that Jeremy helped Mr. O Halloran steal the money.
And why do you refuse to discuss RLB’s role in the Fraud. And have ELS told you to back off from Wilkins Kennedy and Mr. Mac Donald pending the outcome of the correspondence being sent by ELS to seek settlement in the matter.
@ RH why?
TS see you must mistake us for people who care about the Ameless family and Harlequin. We are employing the tactics of the Ameless family and Harlequin and their in house solicitors.
See we don’t give a damn about Ameless, his disfunctional thieving family or those pathetic neanderthal’s who seek to lie and who fail to put up any form of reasoned argument in order to support the claims they make in support of Harlequin.
We don’t care about any confidentiality agreements Harlequin force people to enter into.
We don’t care about all the without prejudice correspondence flying about the place regarding negotiations pertaining to settlement of various matters.
We will take a view on what the purchasers need to see in order for them to be allowed make an informed decision on how to proceed in getting their money back from Harlequin.
FDNRM is very happy and content that he is getting a return. Alluding to the fact that he is using this money to go on s holiday. FDNRM is fully aware that 100’s of purchasers are struggling to meet their monthly financial commitments as a result of the failure by Harlequin to make the interest payments.
FDNRM despite appearing to be an uneducated, inarticulate foul mouthed bitter old man on this forum expects us to believe that it is as a result of him bring somehow ” cleaver” that he was getting his ROI on his investment.
Just for the record re: FDNRM defamation / deformation
On August 13, 2013 at 2:07 pm FDNRM writes
“@Ralph, nice try to turn the tide against HP in the deformation case…”
@FDNRM, re. your post of 7.15 last night, if clever is someone who makes an investment and makes a return, then by rights that should make me clever as I appear to have invested more money than you at roughly the same time but am not seeing a return. Which would suggest that there is more to being clever than you say. Out of interest, do you know what the difference is between you and I? You obviously did something I didn’t.
@Sid, yes I did.
@dd, trawling back to 13 th Aug to look at old posts. SPELLING POLICE. You sad sad git. Think it’s worth Ralph Newman writing a full page on? Yes you probably do.
FDNRM would you care to tell purchasers how you managed to get a return when no one else did. Your information might help others in getting their returns.
TS FDNRM we have a simple question. Would Mr. Ames have been in a position to complete all his resorts as per his contractual obligations had not the fraud occurred. ?
He agreed to blog for Ames in an attempt to discredit genuine purchasers for this he gets £1000 every three months . He proved his payments to Fatshit .
Now bob go on holiday . It’s over the fat lady is singing
@FDNRM, I’m pleased for you. Can you explain where I went wrong?
Though if all we’re talking about is £333pm, I’m not sure I’m that bothered!
@Ralph, I am so please that we have agreed on something. You are so right, if the O’Halloran fraud had not taken place then BB would have been completed earlier, the opening would have been earlier, cash flow would have been better, interest payments would probably have been met and we all could have used a hertz rental car and had a day out at a racetrack in St Lucia. O’Halloran and his cohorts (and you know who YOU, sorry, they are) defrauded every investor in HP and should hang their heads in shame.
@Sid, Dont believe a word of what Richard Hannah says, he is guessing and his facts are just plain wrong. I would tell you but I dont like to rub the poor souls nose in it. Hes only got another 38 steps to go before he gets wherever he is going.
Surely for it to be a return on investment, the original capital needs to be demonstrably ringfenced and safe (or at least accounted for) — either with title deeds, or with appropriate corroborating accounts or similar? In the absence of that, the potential must exist that it is not so much a roi, as your own money being paid back to you very, very slowly.
@Sid, I could tell you what I did different to you, in fact I have alluded to it a long time ago, but I’m waiting for know all Ralph to tell you. Mind you the WK files lifted by the SFO probably did not have the up to date information.
@Ralph, go and have another dig around in them, lets see if you can find the answer then. Just a tiny hint Ralph, just between you and me now we are agreed on the effect O’Hallorans fraud had on BB etc, you wont find it on Linkedin!
@FDNRM
No.
Intelligent people use short cut to Find a word / phrase = Ctrl + F > type word into dialogue box + highlight.
All matching words / phrases will be highlighted throughout webpage / document.
Simple FDNRM.
Of all the delusional statements made by Bob recently, the one to Ralph at 11.39 am takes the prize. He gives the impression that BB has been completed , which as we all know is not so. It is perhaps 20 % completed when compared to what was being sold to investors.
If he had not bought Alamanda hotel, Blu, and two beat up 9 seater planes for his “airline” a few more villas might have been completed . But the entire Resort?
Whose fault is it for not having a solid, written contract for a multimillion dollar building project ……oh I forgot, that’s someone else’s fault!
There is no race course in St Lucia fyi.
It is clear that no other resorts will be commenced, never mind completed, and frankly a good thing as they would have been white elephants anyway given the terrible locations. The round in circles discussions are not very enlightening. Does anyone know what Gareth Fatchett is doing and how he is getting on? Harlequin Caribbean has been trading insolvent for many years, and has massive creditors, the main ones being those whose contracts have been breached and are owed their money back. But there are many many others. Until a creditor takes firm action, the farce will continue, or until BB finally closes due to not paying its staff or other creditors who also take action finally and can see these discussions going round in circles for a while yet. The facts to all those with any common sense confirm Harlequin is a shambles, and likely a scam from the outset, and could never have been anything else – sold units it could not build, never mind the planning etc, and it has indeed not built them, so purchasers have nothing. The numbers never made any sense, the model was more than bizarre with so much money going out in commissions and on non building related cost items.Those facts would be enough for me to file against directors personally and Harlequin. Harlecon came along later, and the alleged fraud is a drop in the bucket compared to the money required to fulfill its contractual obligations. Engaging with anyone who cannot see the obvious, or chooses not to admit it is a waste of time. It is also a criminal offence to trade insolvent in the Caribbean, although not taken as seriously as the UK where custodial sentences have been handed out for much less serious cases as this one.
From the judgment: “The monies were sent to Ireland under bogus descriptions of ‘invoices’ or ‘management fees’ or ‘salary’ so as to conceal their true purpose.”
Jeremy Newman as Paudie O’Halloran’s accountant would not spot that huh?
Can anyone confirm if it is true that Ames promised the staff at BB that they would be paid yesterday and if so, if they were?
From the document you shared yourself Newman:
An expert forensic accountant from Grant Thornton, who gave evidence in court, produced a report which showed the rate at which Mr O’Halloran was fraudulently misappropriating funds from Harlequin rose by 60% when he was joined by Mr Newman in September 2009.
The Judgment states at paragraph 44:
“… and in particular, he (The Forensic accountant from Grant Thornton) noticed an uplift (in the level of misappropriation) in relation to the period of October and November 2009.”
Jeremy Newman starts working for Paudie O’Halloran and the fraud spikes. What a coincidence!
And now Jeremy Newman and Paudie O’Halloran have a company together called Kelltek.
I bet they are lining up to work with you in Jordan.
@dd, as an intelligent person can you where I can find Ctrl+F>type on an i Pad? Simple answer will do.
@Yatinkiteasy, do you ever read ANYTHING. How does “Would have been completed” mean the same as “is completed” “has been completed” You are a muppet. Go back to reading TA.
@Annon 73 and I quote “The plaintiffs claimed that the first named defendant lived a very lavish lifestyle at the expense of the plaintiffs and spent their money, inter alia, on purchasing a private jet, renting an expensive mansion in Sandy Lane, Barbados, buying a racetrack in St. Lucia, purchasing a quarry in SVG and buying expensive gifts for his girlfriend. ” Perhaps there are two St Lucia islands?
Looks like Bobbitt/36 francs/ FDNRememberMoi is de-knob happy about his French leave.
Bit like BB 😉 people love working for Fat Matt….anyway not for long.
Ho Ho Ho Ho “An expert forensic accountant from Grant Thornton, who gave evidence in court, produced a report which showed the rate at which Mr O’Halloran was fraudulently misappropriating funds from Harlequin rose by 60% when he was joined by Mr Newman in September 2009.”
Dont forget investors, THATS YOUR MONEY NEWMAN WAS TAKING!
Come on Ralph got an answer to that?
Bugger of to Frog land Bobbies Helmet
TS FDNRM you both will agree with us that Phase 1 of Buccament Bay has yet to be completed. And yes FDNRM you make a valid point or rather you raise an interesting point on the issue of the resort having been completed or phase 1 having been completed had the 13 million USD been spent on it.
“You are so right, if the O’Halloran fraud had not taken place then BB would have been completed earlier”, ……
Bob…this is what you said…any educated person would read that statement to mean that the resort was completed…perhaps you are having early senility at age 64….it happens, dont be embarrassed about it.
Dave and Carol Ames made a decision to forgo a formal legal contract that might have protected Harlequin and the investors’ money when they jumped into bed up with the Irish lot.
I wonder why? The fishes are beginning to really stink especially the Runwell Orfs.
@TS tell Daddy we know about the deal with Seven Capital
@FDNRM, that is why I said there is no racetrack in St Lucia. It is a very odd comment in that judgement, as I can tell you there is no racetrack in St Lucia. Have been in that region 40 years doing business, can tell you there is none, unless someone has done it without telling anyone or without having any race horses. I know someone has talked about putting one there, which is as pointless as putting an ashtray on a motorbike, so perhaps that is what is referred to (about as pointless also as trying to put a resort on the Marquis Estate land). It was a minor point as not really relevant to the rest of my post which I would have thought more significant but obviously not.
@dd, still waiting for my keyboard tutorial. Oh silly me, you did not realise that there are two operating systems, PC and MAC. Let me explain, ready steady, MAC = I Pad = moving around the house. Now if you want to understand anything else regarding computer technology then go and ask a 5 year old for an explanation.
@Anon 73 I was just quoting from the judgement. Regarding your other comment, who is trading insolvent in the Caribbean?
Who said anything about horses, the judge said race track not race course so could mean Caca Bef.
Okay Gang high-tail it over to i-witness-news. It just posted
a very interesting article re: Buccament Bay. Looks like they are
selling off furniture/tile to make payroll.
Who said anything about payroll?
Fat Matt’s fire sale
http://www.iwnsvg.com/2013/08/20/opposition-leader-raises-questions-as-resort-owners-sell-tiles-and-furniture/
FDNRM we will deal with your “ho ho ho ho” comment shortly. But could we ask that you form your own opinion on the facts and not having to rely on TS to bring matters publically available to your attention.
But firstly back to the issue of completion of phase 1 of Buccament Bay.
The judge states in his conclusion of facts (iv) that phase 1 of Buccament Bay would have been completed for the money paid to the ICE Group (52 million) we have to add the 5 million that was paid to Ridgeview Construction as is contained in the “Independant expert Report” of BCQS.
This gives us a total of 57 million.Let us take the 13 million away from this figure ( the alleged miss appropriation) (( remember a judgement has only been given in respect of 2 million)), this leaves 44 million.
So why is phase 1 of Buccament Bay still not complete (70 % complete). Futhermore to the date of the sacking of ICE Group off the project 86 million had been spent on construction. 52 million paid to ICE Group and 34 million paid to Ridgeview Construction.
In addition Harlequin claimed in Court that 48 million was spent between the termination of the ICE Group Contract and October 2012.
A total of 124 million. On the 70% of phase 1.
Then in February 2013 in documents sent to the BBC Harlequin demonstrated that 153 million was spent on the construction of 70% of phase 1.
So to recap based on the evidence put before the judge, the judge stated that phase 1 could be completed for 57 million leaving a small profit.
Yet 86 million was spent on the construction of Buccament Bay phase 1 up to the termination date of the ICE group. And between 48 million and 67 million since then Now FDNRM can you explain to us your rationale in view of this information. ?
Given that Ames admits there are only 102 units available to complete on.
I am aware your comment was a quote, so my questioning was of the quote, not your comment. It is concerning that someone is convicted for spending money on something that does not exist but as I said it is not relevant in the bigger picture. We have to accept he is guilty either way.
According to Harlequin, and one or two purchasers I have spoken to, the purchaser is contracting with the relevant Caribbean company.developing their unit. Those companies all owe refunds to purchasers having missed completion dates but is not making those refunds, nor is it able to refund as there is no money. Further, Harlequin do not just owe purchasers money, but a huge number of trades, contractors and service providers. This includes Buccament Bay resort which has a long list of creditors. A company is trading insolvent if it has not been able to meet its financial obligations for a period of time. This is true of a number of Harlequin’s companies. As I have said before, I have no dog in this fight as I would never have invested in this in a million years knowing how none of the sums, the model, styles of resorts or locations made any sense, however as a citizen of the region, I do not like the bad publicity caused by this company which has an appalling reputation. Not having a written agreement with a contractor is just icing on the cake – utterly unheard of and inexcusable. Not to mention not escrowing purchaser funds etc etc, but don’t want to go round in circles again. We just need this farce to end, so again would be curious to know what progress if any is being made by Mr Fatchett.
I am not sure what telling my father about it will achieve other than a shared sense of puzzlement but OK I will tell him.
Ho Ho Ho Ho. FDNRM the judge relied on the evidence provided by the “Independent” expert witnesses. Many judges do. In this case BCQS and Grant Thornton.
HOWEVER it transpired during the course of the trial that the “Independent” expert witnesses were not totally independent after all.
In both cases the “Independent” expert witnesses relied on Harlequin to provide them with the bulk of their information in which to formulate their reports.
Take the example of BCQS Harlequin provided information to BCQS demonstrating that RidgeView had been paid circa 5 million USD.
On the last day of their evidence Harlequin stated that 34 million was paid to Ridge View but would not be drawn on what this money was for. The judge was not interested in this as it was peripheral to the Irish case in his view and was satisfied that phase 1 could be completed for the monies paid to the ICE Group.
We have since obtained the evidence that RidgeView was paid 34 million USD for the construction of Buccament Bay.
We will be dealing with the ” Independent” expert witness reports in detail later.
According to the transcripts, there was no racing course or horse racing track. It was a staging post. And the monies paid for this land was refunded to the ICE Group when the deal fell through. Well this according to the transcripts anyway.
Jeremy sorry “Ralph” my Irish journalist contact has shared some more of their notes.
Towards the end of Jeremy Newman’s cross-examination it was established that ICE Group left the Buccament site in a “total mess” and not what an expert expected “if there was genuine intent to finish the
project”. It was also established that ICE left debts all over the Caribbean which made life much harder for Harlequin when they picked up the baton.
Do you have a copy of that transcript to share with the class?
@Ralph
“HOWEVER it transpired during the course of the trial that the “Independent” expert witnesses were not totally independent after all.
“In both cases the “Independent” expert witnesses relied on Harlequin to provide them with the bulk of their information in which to formulate their reports.”
So now you are claiming the judgment was wrong? The judge was wrong to rely upon the independent witnesses he cited in his judgment?
Yes Ralph, everything is “we will deal with this later” . You have an open invitation to post the whole of the transcripts on BFP so why not do it? Alas everything on here that you claim is opinion or supersicion. Just go Ralph and prepare for your court case. I’m bored with you now.
Jeremy “Ralph” Newman just cannot make his mind up.
“We can agree that the judgment is correct…… except all the things that make me and my friends look bad…… so all of it really.”
TS we will of course produce all the transcripts. However again your journalist has not been listening as demonstrated to you before. Harlequin made the allegation as to the condition of the site. And Harlequins barrister put it as a Question to Mr. Newman. You or your journalist have miss quoted the transcript.
TS do us all a favour and just reproduce from the transcript you have in front of you. The question and answer. Ames through Mr. Oltrom and Taylor sent the transcripts and witness statements to the BBC throughout the Irish Case. We know we have the complete copies.
We are much too busy preparing to upload the fraudulent management accounts for Harlequin’s overseas companies for everyone to see and waiting to see what happened to Matt Ames in the Old Bailey today in front of the Hon Judge Wide QC in Court no. 16.
TS we are not questioning the judgement. The judgement is based on the evidence presented to him. We are stating that the ” Expert” witnesses relied primarily on the information provided by Harlequin and the Ames family. And the expert witnesses acknowledge this.
So in no way are we questioning the judgement or indeed in this case the expert witnesses.
We are challenging the veracity of the information provided to the expert witnesses by Harlequin and the Ames family given that Harlequin and or the Ames family were complicit at least in forging numerous documents , appear not to understand what a certificate of truth is. Have produced manifestly false management accounts or more importantly fraudulent accounts. Have through project orange deliberately destroyed evidence that demonstrated that the Ames family were engaging in fraud. Have wiped servers clean that held vital evidence Etc etc etc. This is what we will demonstrate to the public.
So NO we are most definitely not questioning the judgement.
Bob sadly you make yourself out to be a fool, but your not. We cannot for legal reasons expose you yet. But we will Bob. Don’t worry we will. And we will look forward to it.
TS Bob Ameless does not want a defamation case. TS the case was due to be heard in November. Care to enlighten everyone on here why this is not now going to happen? Bob have you any idea? You two neanderthals appear to know so much. Care to make a comment. Care to respond as to why given the figures produced in the Irish Court case Buccament Bay was not completed.
So you think you are smarter than the judge because he could not see through the expert evidence that you said was undermined in court?
Ralph Newman, you tool. “you cannot expose you yet for legal reasons” Bit late for that arent you Jeremy. You are right I am not a fool as you will find out.
TS Bob we have a huge amount of information pertaining to the Ames family and Harlequin. Given the large number of legal actions currently under way, and the numerous investigations being conducted our primary concern is not to be prejudicial to any parties who are seeking justice and redress against the Ames family and Harlequin, this will sometimes have the effect that information we want to make public might not happen as quickly as we and you Neanderthals might like. We are fully aware that also puts the Ames family and Harlequin at a distinct disadvantage. Our answer to that is “TOUGH”. As the song goes, “we have all the time in the world.” Does Harlequin?
As a result we will not be dictated to by a pair of Neanderthals such as yourselves as to when and what we produce. Why don’t you boys remain as patient as the Ames family ?
One last word on the issue of the expert witnesses you pair of gormless neanderthals for the time being. We never stated that the evidence of the expert witnesses was undermined in court. We stated that we will be examining and testing the veracity of the information provided to the expert witnesses by the Ames family.
This will demonstrate to all that the Ames family are consumate liars and will hopefully assist those looking to have justice served in taking this disfunctional family out of circulation thus preventing more people from loosing everything they have.
Bob we were not referring to making your name public or indeed your address.
Ah bless Jeremy is that your new word for the day, Neanderthals (notice the capital N) Did you get that from your Janet and John book. Making my name public and my address was a BIG mistake. Remember everything is traceable.
Thing is £400 million collected, very very little to show ..the Ames family are down and out fraudsters….it runs through em like blackpool through a stick of rock
This is a scam run by a fraudster and con man with his crooked family
nothing more to say…..one big scam by a crooked family
that’s it
Yes Bob EVERYTHING is traceable. And one day you WILL discover we is not Jeremy.
Dave and Carol are quickly learning that EVERYTHING is TRACEABLE too.
And so will you. You little thief you. Is that not correct Bob. A little thief and a fraudster. See you never did declare those returns after all did you Bob. Naw we didn’t think so.
But that’s not what we are talking about now Bob is it? Hmmmm is it Bob? No its not is it.?
People in Glass Houses should never throw stones. Your a hypocrite Bob. People on here are loosing everything and all you can do is gloat and lie and defend Dave and Carol Ames to the hilt.
You have attacked Mr. Newman incessantly over the past few weeks. You stated that Mrs Mac Donald owned a house in Southend even though the poor woman died nearly 2 years ago.
You are fixated by Mr. Newman on the instructions of your master Ames. Ask Mr. Fatchet how he trusted Ames and how Ames is hanging him out to dry.
Bob you are a twisted bitter sad little man.
And “thick”, Ralph, don’t forget that.
@Ralf, yeah yeah. Funny how I’m so important to you isn’t it. I must be a real threat to you. Why would that be I wonder? You must be so worried. How was LinkedIn site Jeremy? Find out anything new at all? Well I wonder who Mrs MacDonald passed her house onto Jeremy? Who cares. It will be gone.
Anon RU you pathetic arse licker. Jeremy send him a picture so he can bow down chanting ” I am unworthy”
Bob you are of real interest to us. But you have no idea why? Have you? Now when your Mummys house gets taken well well.
thing is…the walls are starting to fall in and are gathering pace….very soon the noose will tighten….you simply cant fraud £400million and think it will all go away…too much money, too many people…and then once those at the top fall (that’s all the ames family) the pain comes down to the next level and then the next and then fdnrm et al will all be living on even more state benefits (after a short stay hmp of course for their part in the deception
those on the free side will laugh and laugh and then when fdnrm is released he wont even be able to get a job at Macdonalds…see even they have morals
enjoy things whilst you can fdnrm, coz its investors money paying for your holiday…..both to France and hmp Ames
now that is funny
I agree with what you’re saying @One Big Fraud, but don’t expect I’ll be laughing too much as/when I lose almost £200k.
Ralph,
It would be naive to think fatchett has nothing up his sleeve . If you are in the know, you would already understand why Fatchett can sit back. H has no deadline to meet. Ames has.
TV news from St Vincent..Harlequin story about selling tiles and furniture (from start to 2mins 31sec) Manger could not be reached for comment…wonder why?
Keep up the great work Yatink……HD will probably
blame poor Kenny Miller
Ralph,
Are you sure matt Ames was in court today ? I cannot find it listed .
@Yatink… I wonder if ANYTHING in Barbados is left that was
brought in for Merricks? Probably gracing some villa on Sandy Lane.
Try looking at the old bailey list he was supposed to attend at 10.30 court 16
Richard,
Do you have a link ?
MA was supposed to appear in Sept 2013, not August.
Ok the old bailey is a liar too…….. Matthew Ames 10.30 today in front of judge wide qc. Defendant to attend ,
Matt Ames was summoned to appear in court this morning in the Old Bailey. It was a pre trial hearing. We are awaiting confirmation that he indeed attended the hearing.
Matt Ames has not yet filed a defence in his fraud case, he may attempt to seek an adjournment in his case.
So did the staff at BB get paid yesterday or was it yet another let down from good old Dave?
@ Anonymous
Probably not good enough quality for anywhere at Sandy Lane.
SGD – Some extremely expensive glass tile for the Show Village
water feature….would you believe around $75 Dollars Barbados
per square foot. That ain’t cheap…
@ Sid…..ouch £200k the laugh I meant was referring to fdnrm when he ends ups in mire do to his mis-placed support for DA/HP etc….I hata all fraudsters
You may be surprised how much is recovered from various locations, but there will be losses and of course the recovery of any funds will take many many years.
SGD – that is 75 Dollars B duty and vat free
Don’t worry One big fraud, I haven’t kissed it goodbye just yet!
Another good performance today Ralph, exposing the shambles that is Harlequin. FDNRM seems bamboozled by it all. France can’t come quick enough for Bob le Nob!
@ Anonymous
Two questions:
1. That is quite a lot for tiles. I hope they weren’t purchased from Uncle Ames Inc, that well known Bajan importer of low cost tiles from Miami.
2. Did they go through the duty free concession for Merricks or the H Hotel?
SGD –
1 – 1% Gold Leaf Italian Glass from Murano (Venice)
2 – Bajan custom broker would have to answer that but I am almost
certain it was on H-Hotel waiver.
Don’t need to worry seven capital will come charging in and bail out Harlequin, they will even arrange a jail break for fatty Matty
FDNRM,
Did nobody tell you about the finance? You must be chocking on your poisson et frites……. & boîte de vin
Jeremy Newman has a new company called Galaxy Entertainment Ltd. Is the “Ralph” persona meant to be the entertainment? I suppose it is entertaining in a tragic way.
https://www.duedil.com/company/08478013/galaxy-entertainment-limited
@ FDNRM & TS – The biggest hypocrites ever. You have problems with your personal details being published on here but have no scruples about publishing peoples addresses on here.
I have been watching this for some time my thought is that David Ames is incompetent and not so much Robin Hood as Robbing Bastard. Maybe we should put pictures up of Carol Ames’s mums house after all we paid for it. Or FDNRM your house? After all we’re paying your mortgage too.
‘not so much Robin Hood as Robbing Bastard’ One of the best ones yet 🙂
Basildon Echo: Harlequin wins court battle – Wilkins Kennedy accountant “in league” with O’Halloran
https://anonfiles.com/file/a1b076bd224165e1418bba167d17fd68
DAHRM my personal details have not been published so I have not complained at all. They cannot even get my first name right.
Jeremy “Ralph” Newman, Martin MacDonald and Paudie O’Halloran deserve everything they get. They are still trying to ruin a company and thousands of people’s lives because they do not want to lie in the bed they made. They are the scum of the earth.
TS the judge made no finding whatsoever against Mr. Newman. Mr. Mac Donald did not attend court so the judge based his findings on the evidence provided by Harlequin.
In a letter to the BBC in February and again in March Mr. Ames stated that Wilkins Kennedy was prevented from discussing any issues pertaining to Harlequin as a result of a confidentiality arrangement that accountants have with their clients current and past.
Is this why Mr. Mac Donald did not attend court. Mr. Mac Donald has not been suspended nor has he been dismissed.
Ames despite shouting from the roof tops has not in three years proceeded with the professional negligence claim against Wilkins Kennedy. All he has done is to issue a pre action protocol.
He is currently trying to seek an out of court settlement on the defamation claim.
And is it rather strange. Wilkins Kennedy do not appear as a creditor on the Shipleys Creditor list.
You also refuse to state anything as it pertains to RLB. The judge was very critical of RLB stating that they had tempered documents etc. Harlequin have also in court documents alleged that RLB accepted bribes.
RLB is one of the largest QS firms in the world. They are also a contractor to the UK Government and the MOD. The judge did not state that Mr. Newman was in any way connected with the fraud despite your protestations to the contrary, he was however very critical of RLB and stated that they tempered documents but you have remained resolutely silent on the matter.
Do you not consider the fact that RLB is a government contractor and an MOD contractor that it would be incumbent on Mr. Ames or even your good self to report them given the judges findings that they were complicit in the fraud.
You have also refused point blank to make any comment on Matt Ames even though he was marketing director of Harlequin to 2008.
You have failed to make any reference what so ever on the ongoing investigations in to Harlequin by the authorities.
You have no views on Garret Fatchett and his rescue plans. You have no views on the Ames family and the money they borrowed from purchasers to buy family properties.
@TS, are you trying to say that the only reason I have not seen a return on my £200k investment which I made in 2007 for a 2008 completion is because of Jeremy “Ralph” Newman, Martin MacDonald and Paudie O’Halloran? Are they also the reason that I cannot get the refund I am contractually entitled to and have been unable to get for over 5 years? Does none of the blame lie with Ames & Co?
Please do answer the above.
Ralph how strange then that neither Martin MacDonald nor Wilkins Kennedy informed the court of that and yet you know all about it supposedly.
Also if what you say is true why did they lie in the Echo? They whined that they had no opportunity to respond which is false anyway.
A WK solicitor attended court just to say they did not agree with some of the things being said and then vanished into the shadows again.
Wilkins Kennedy are running scared and did not want to be dragged any deeper into the damaging judgment.
Yet again it is shown how Jeremy Newman is full of crap. That may explain the 40in waist line.
Of the fewer then 100 employees of the Buccament Bay staff employed (or left) less then 20 of them received the salaries due to them.
The staff had been paid half salary for 3 months. Less then £40,000 is owed to the staff yet Harlequin cannot pay this.
Matt Ames has warned staff as has Carol and Dave that if they speak out against Harlequin or the Ames family they will not see their back pay and staff were further told that there are plenty of people willing to replace any staff members who dare speak out.
The defamation case and Mr. Newman have been used by the Ameless’s as an example of how far the Ameless family are prepared to go in order to protect the family name and honour.
Matt Ames told the staff that the PM of St. Vincent would not help them given that Dave Ames is the most important investor on the island.
Just so everyone is clear, the whole court case(s) saga may seem like a distraction, but nobody on here with an investment in HP is in any doubt that their money has been taken by Ames, not Jeremy “Ralph” Newman, Martin MacDonald and Paudie O’Halloran. I think I speak for us all when I say we couldn’t give a flying shit about the court case(s) which only accounts for a few pence in the pound of what is missing or has been misspent. So carry on chaps with your debate about who did what to who, who lied, who has what evidence etc, but it doesn’t change the big picture in the slightest and nobody feels any differently about their personal situation since the recent ruling. It is yet another sideshow in the Harlequin circus and is actually becoming very boring and monotonous.
Do us a favour TS, answer my post from 10.47, or failing that, give us some positive news to hang on to….not more comments about how other people have wronged HP so HP aren’t to blame, as it’s already worn very, very thin. What we all need is some good news that can give some hope to the sorry situation we unfortunately find ourselves in. Have you got any?
I’ll go out on a limb and say that I speak for many (dare I say the majority?) with the above.
Sid they are the main reason absolutely.
They stole from Harlequin and held back development.
They left tons of debts and a terrible reputation for Harlequin to rebuild in the Caribbean.
They created the defamatory Harlecon website to destroy Harlequin and stop being exposed for the above.
Harlecon caused a lot of bad press which put the company under strain and made it impossible to get finance.
Jeremy Newman sent the SFO a Harlecon file to instigate their investigation. The SFO confirmed he sent it to them.
Gareth Fatchett smelt blood and jumped on the bandwagon with lots of bad PR against Harlequin but found the company was clean so he is focused on IFAs now.
If you are not aware of all the above you need to stop wasting your time on here and listening to Jeremy Newman.
Missed this in the Nation newspaper in Barbados from yesterday:
http://www.nationnews.com/index.php/articles/view/developer-to-pay-damages/
On first read I thoiught the Nation was being careful about the defamation laws here when it starts off:
“IF THE EVIDENCE presented in an Irish court is accurate….”
On reflection, I wonder if they know more than they are telling and they are aware that the evidence presented in the case is not accurate.
Surely that could not be a correct interpretation, could it?
Sid excellent post. The reality of the situation is now very bleak. Mr. Ames has recently acknowledged the fact that his companies are insolvent.
This can be backed up by the numerous documents we have seen coupled with the Shipleys report.
A rescue plan can not now be a viable option given that 100’s of claims are being processed for action against IFA’s and agents. If these claims are upheld and paid out by the insurers. The purchasers will be obliged to surrender their contracts to the insurers who will then make claims against Harlequin or any rescued version.
The Harlequin dream is over. TS and others are being employed by the Ames family in order to soften the blow when the companies enter the liquidation process.
The award in the Irish court was 0.3% of total deposits taken or 0.1% of total sales.
Yet Harlequin will claim that this 0.1% brought down the company.
We can only sympathise with purchasers, SIPP purchasers are in a stronger position with respect to their UK claims.
This will of course help with most cash purchasers in claims against the liquidators.
But sadly cash purchasers will loose < 80% of their deposits.
TS, my units were set to complete in 2008 but there are still no plans to even start them. For them to have been complete in 2008 they should have been under construction in 2007. Did Newman rip you off in 2007?
TS – a lie is halfway round the world before the truth has its boots on – the truth is walking towards the boot store right now .
The judgement is for 1.5 million where is the 398.5 million . Don’t presume to understand Fatchetts plan it’s got balls all to do with I.f.a claims that’s why he is just sitting back
SGD – Ultimately it will be the governments of the island nations
that will have to take action re: in place physical assets
TS – Specious bull crap
Ralph, is that your opinion or is it fact? Has Ames publicly announced he is trading insolvently and is the rescue plan definitely dead and buried? I was told only last week by RL that there are genuine investors that want to step in. Have things changed in the past week?
The Ames family take £30,000 each month just to get by on excluding bonus net of tax – hard life for them.
So TS ( aka Fatty Matty) impossible to get finance!!!…. stuffed then eh?
Its over for you and your family – you are just to up your own arse. Never mind others will be up yours soon – watch the soap in the showers 😉
Ames THINKS he has a rescue plan with seven capital
http://sevencapital.co.uk/hotels
I think it would be good to draw a line over the court case now. HP won and got a few quid, well done, I’m pleased for you.
However, we are where we are. So my question for you TS (I aim it at you as you appear to be a voice of HP) is what will change going forward? Is there a way forward or are HP going to admit that there is none and lay the blame at the feet of Newman & Co?
If there is a future for HP you’re all doing an excellent job of keeping it to yourselves. The secret about good news is that you should spread it to keep people on side. I can only assume that there is none or you would be shouting it from the rooftops rather than looking backwards at what went wrong, which only sounds like an admission of defeat.
Leaky Leaky, does he really or is it just another ruse to buy another 3 months grace?
Sid I am an investor as I have said before. You should speak to your rep or your agent as you apparently know nothing and just drink Jeremy Newman’s bulls**t.
VIDEO: PAUDIE O’HALLORAN LYING TO HARLEQUIN INVESTORS
Jeremy Newman’s literal partner in crime now at Kelltek Group.
There is not even a guard at Merricks…apparently its a free for all up there as far as building materials is concerned.Not much left I`m told , a big 18 wheeler took away a lot of stuff about 5 months ago.Who took it? Where did it go? Anyone`s guess.
VIDEO: SOMEONE ELSE LYING TO HARLEQUIN INVESTORS
TS, you are as bent as the Ames. Absolute insanity for anyone to think for a second the Ames can actually find a way to develop the6000 unstarted units. They would not be able to do even basic infrastructure work to begin building units at Marquis. Even if they had planning. Good posts Sid – and of course the joke of a business model was flawed from start and your investment was lost long before newman or even Ice got involved. They gave too much to agents, took too much themselves and the resorts was terribly conceived in the first place. Harlecon was just informing people of the scam and slowed the flow of money into the scheme. Development lesson 101 – if you sell property off plan, escrow the money until all funds are in place to complete the build, combined with the future stage payments of the buyer. You get finance in place before you start building, you don’t wait for years. Oh, and you have a contact for a $50m deal! Only Ames to blame for all of that.
TS, for the record I don’t give shit about what Ralph is saying. I have a contract with HP, not Ralph. It is HP that have failed to deliver their promises to me. I’m not involved in the court saga – like I keep saying. I’m an investor, that’s it. My units are 6 years late and I am told won’t be built for at least 2 years. Do you want me to be happy about that? And talk to my agent, why? Will he make my units appear or give me a refund?
And if you’re a happy investor, what are you happy about? Do you think you have made a sound investment?
Sid yes Ames has acknowledged his businesses are insolvent. We cannot say any more on this but will be able to give definitive proof at a later stage.
With respect to Garrett Fatchet his obligations are to his clients alone and not to Harlequin investors as a whole.
We believe he is now waiting on the sidelines and will look at making an offer to any potential liquidator in respect of the assets.
We believe the meeting Ames had with Tailormade was the final nail in the coffin for Mr. Fatchett.
It is reported that Ames told Tailormade that he had confirmation that Harlequin would be Sippable again very soon and that in no way did he (Ames) condone or support the actions of Garret Fatchet and RL.
Now we cannot speak for Garret Fatchet but in light of what TS has stated ( GF found nothing wrong with Harlequin ) and given TS’s very close links to Harlequin. We ask if Garret would give everyone his take on events. However we fully understand that he has no obligation to do so as his obligations are to his clients.We ask however given TS emphatic statement on the issue.
We would however like to ask Garret whether he could comment on the selling of the same unit to different purchasers.
Sid I bet you do not have a contract with HP because I do not.
If you do not see the reasons why it is not Harlequin that failed you after everything I have posted I cannot help you because you will not listen to FACTS.
I am happy because Harlequin have shown they are more than capable of creating a excellent resort. I believe they will make it happen.
Anon you are a complete idiot.
TS, so I’m clear, having just watched the video you put up, I in no way support or defend O’Halloran and am not at all impressed by him. I am not on the side of him or anyone associated with him. Nor do I believe everything Newman says, as you claim. But none of this does anything to improve my situation. There appear to be 2 clear camps, HP and Newman. I sit in neither and am in fact in camp 3, the investors who have given ALL the money and have seen nothing in return.
St Vincent PM now saying Airport will be completed around this time next year.Every year its pushed out another year.Based on this, I would not expect any major airlines operating there until mid 2015 at the earliest.
http://www.iwnsvg.com/2013/08/21/work-at-argyle-airport-to-be-completed-by-this-time-next-year/
Sid that is a fair stance but you sounded like you was blaming HP and what I was saying to you is there is obviously a lot more to the situation than HP failed. They have made mistakes but mainly they have been sabotaged. You have my sympathy for your situation. I believe it will improve.
For everyone is what I meant including you Sid.
TS, on the contrary, I only listen to facts. So give it to me straight, is it a fact that I will get my money back, or is it a fact that I can’t because O’Halloran has rinsed HP dry? If there is no money left in the pot because of O’Halloran then just say so.You talk about facts when the only ones you state are about the court case. What are the facts about the business?
@Ralph GARETH ! Not Garrett, not Garret, Come on Jeremy get something right!
Sorry TS, I was typing that last one while you posted. There is a lot of blame with a lot people, but now really is the time for some solid statements.
Was not DA seen and heard on that TS video joking, commenting and agreeing with what “Paudie” was saying?
Always someone else to blame.
TS ( toss pot Fatty Matty) strange how you never comment about the fraud case in September or the Seven Capital offer?
Game over!!
What’s happening about the Shipley rescue plan tick tock!
Sid I know what I presume every other investor knows and that is they are restructuring, seeking finance and now Fatcvhett is working with Harlequin instead of against them with bad press. The company and the hotels are still here after everything thrown at them by O’Halloran, Newman and Fatchett and that can only be a good sign.
TS excellent video posted. We have been informed that the video was taken in October / November 2008. Ames acknowledged to the court that all was well up to June 2009.
We can hear Mr and Mrs Ames in the background laughing and joking.
This same video was used by Ames and his agents in promoting Buccament Bay. But there is no sign of Newman.
Are you suggesting that Mr. and Mrs. Ames were working in league with Mr. O Halloran as far back as October 2008.
Do you care to comment on the next video posted by Yatinkiteasy. Or are you or Ames going to claim that this video was made under duress. As Mr.Ames claimed in the Irish court on the issue of making payments to Mr. O Halloran.
TS why don’t you or why cant you answer Sids questions.
And why do you and Harlequin seek to destroy Mr. Newmans business and thus any chance of him making money in advance of the victory you and Harlequin are claiming over him in the defamation case. Surely one would expect you to allow him to make a fortune ahead of the judgement you seem convinced will be made against him.
This will allow Harlequin recoup all the legal costs in addition to the very large damages Newman will have to pay Harlequin which will enable Harlequin pump this money back into his resorts giving Sid and everyone else their units.
Yatink stop being so stupid. O’Halloran was the contractor and supposed expert making the claims and that is why Ames paid him.
Lying conman employs lying conman.
Poetic justice.
Leaky your ability to prove you are not a leak astounds me. I thought Matt was supposed to be in Buccament.
Ralph is very strange for a supposed Bajan resident in that he only comments during UK hours. Almost as if he is on UK time. Lying scum.
TS is Harlequin or are the Ames family still being investigated by the Authorities in the UK. And if they are would that not be a major stumbling block to any potential financier.
SID it might be well worth seeking clarification from Garett Fatchett on the issue for all concerned. TS’s comments on the issue are certainly not reflective of the RL twitter feed.
Does anyone know what became of the freezing orders that were in place in Feb/March? The one’s who were apparently successful. Did they ever get a pay out?
O’Halloran may have got the completion date wrong and Mr Ames may have relied on him to get it right. Sounds like a typical builder, by the way, the sort that you tie down with a tight construction contract with liquidated damages payable if he does not meet his contractual obligations.
The video of Mr Ames raises a few questions which are not reliant on O’Halloran though:
1. “..we now have almost 100 acres” – incorrect.
2. “…we have the operators in place” – incorrect.
3. “… to my left, this is going to be the marina” – incorrect.
4. ” …a lot of people will be coming in by boat….” – incorrect.
5. “… at the side of the dive shop will be the customs house…”… we can cut out all the delays in the airports by going through customs on our own resort..” – incorrect.
I guess Trader Vic’s etc, is just slow opening up.
The freezing orders in Feb/March were unsuccessful.
Sid we have no dog in this fight. We are seeking to assist everyone affected by Harlequin You, other purchasers, Mr. Newman etc. Harlequin are telling many porkie pies. Ames in various court documents has stated his companies are insolvent.
There is no money. The Ames family have since 2006 tried to raise finance and have failed. They failed when finance was easy to obtain. They failed since then.
There is absolutely no money. The cupboard is bare so to speak.
TS works for Ames yet TS cannot provide evidence to suggest that finance may become available. The claims about GF are bizarre.
But sadly Sid it is our belief that there is nothing you can do. You have to basically wait and see.
All we can do is to continue to provide information to everyone in the hope that someone out there might find something in the information we provide which will assist purchasers in finding a solution to their predicament.
Conversely of course if we were to find any evidence to suggest that Harlequin were on the verge of obtaining finance etc we will make this known.
Garrett Fatchett had a number of paying clients. It is those clients he represents. He will be seeking to get the best results for his clients.
But there are 4000 + purchasers out there who are not represented by RL or Mr. Fatchett. To be fair to Mr. Fatchett he is not Mother Theresa and he will only do what’s best for his clients so any rescue plan TS intimates with respect to Garrett Fatchett will most probably not include the 4000 + purchasers.
@St George’s Dragon, you’re not strictly correct on this occasion. Point 4 was meant as a euphemism.
Wonder how much Ralph Gonsalves received for his performance fee in the video?
But what TS conveniently omits is that freezing assets were obtained against Mr and Mrs Ames’s personal assets and those freezing orders remain.
TS also fails to give reasons as to why the freezing orders were not pursued in Feb / March. GF decided against freezing orders in order to enter into good faith negotiations with Ames and Harlequin. CPC decided to change there strategy instead seeking to obtain freezing orders over the personal Assets of Mr. and Mrs. Ames. This was successful and are still in place.
TS you stated that the freezing orders were unsuccessful. The word unsuccessful suggests that an attempt was made to obtain them in court and was unsuccessful.
We do not believe this to be the case but will of course stand corrected if you can prove other wise.
Thats because TS is Matt Ames
TS just as an aside. You stated that Mr. O Halloran was the expert and that’s why Ames paid him. But would you care to enlighten the rest of the readers what the defence claims are. Is it not the case that Mr. O Halloran and his companies are claiming that Mr. Ames did not pay them what he agreed to pay them by way of Mr. Ames’s “oral” contract.
And furthermore is it not the defendants position that not only did Ames not pay them what he agreed to pay them but indeed could not pay them by reason of the fact that he was trading insolvently. Issues which the judge felt were peripheral to the Irish case.
Now whilst the judge may have felt that the solvency issues of Harlequin were peripheral to the Irish case. We are sure many purchasers who bought during and after this time will be very interested indeed.
Harlequin claimed that Mr. O Halloran’s companies were trading insolvently by June 2010 and the judge agreed. This allowed the judge pierce the corporate veil and allowed Harlequin to go after Mr. O Halloran personally.
Now ironically the same methodology could be used to go after the Ames’s personal assets. Throw Danny and Nicola into the ring and there might be assets to chase after including Thailand, Dubai, Australia etc etc etc.
@Ralph Repeat after me 10 times.
GARETH! GARETH GARETH! GARETH! Have you got it yet.
when will Ames get his mitts on the life changing £1.5m anyway?
Bob , you are en vacance …………..
So go enjoy your pastis
Ralph yet again is lying without evidence. I work for Harlequin do I? How strange because I did not realise an investment translated to employment.
You clearly were too busy with the court case in Ireland at the time but Fatchett took Harlequin to court and failed to get the freezing orders in Feb/March. It was covered in the press and miraculously predicted by the Mail in an article with Fatchett. CPC did not take place in Feb/March so of course I omitted it you moron.
Where are these court documents where Ames says the Harlequin companies are all insolvent? Let me guess it will all be in good time. Full of crap as always.
Jeremy Newman lacks the imagination to do anything else but a poor impression of Harlecon with files posted on dodgy anonymous websites and idiotic rants on BFP. What a complete pleb. I look forward to seeing you ruined.
@ Fatty Matty look forward to seeing you and your stunted family in prison, deep joy!!!
Jeremy Newman why are you prattling on about the defence? This is what was in the judgment. How was Harlequin insolvent if it was making $1m payments each week? Moron.
34. At a meeting on 1st September, 2008, that took place at the plaintiffs’ office at Basildon in the UK, Harlequin agreed to make weekly payments to the ICE Group. The first payment of US$100,000 was transferred on 4th September, 2008, and this was followed by payments of US$125,000 per week thereafter. The agreement was that that sum would be paid per week for 12 weeks. At some time around 13th October, 2008, Mr. Ames was informed by Mr. MacDonald that the ICE Group was doing a very good job on the project and that the weekly payments should be increased to US$165,000 until Christmas in order to speed up construction. Mr. Ames agreed to increase the weekly payment accordingly. The project continued in this way until early 2009.
35. On 17th March, 2009, Harlequin’s payments to the ICE Group increased to Stg.£400,000 per week with effect from 19th March, 2009. This increase was linked to discussions between Mr. Ames, Mr. MacDonald and the first named defendant on site at Buccament Bay in late February 2009. In May 2009, Mr. Ames committed to making increased payments and, specifically, to make 43 weekly payments of Stg.£450,000 in return for the complete delivery of Phase 1 on 1st July 2010. Mr. Ames’ understanding was that those payments would enable Phase 1 to be completed. The price did not include the fit out or furnishing of the restaurants. The weekly payments of Stg.£450,000 continued with some variations until 23rd February, 2010. At a meeting in November 2009, the plaintiffs agreed a revised and reduced scope for Phase 1 to be completed by 1st July, 2009. It was agreed that some remaining elements of Phase 1 would be delivered after 1st July, 2010. By 28th January, 2010, Harlequin had paid 41 of the 43 weekly payments agreed with the ICE Group in May 2009.
36. On 23rd February, 2009, a new payment plan was agreed which involved payments of Stg.£600,000 per week to be made and which were to be supplemented by additional ad hoc payments as and when required to ensure Phase 1 was delivered by 1st July, 2010. These payments were agreed at a time when Mr. Ames was becoming increasingly concerned that the 1st July, 2010, deadline would not be met. The first of the Stg.£600,000 payments was made on 24th February, 2010, and weekly payments in that sum continued until 18th May, 2010. Meanwhile, on 10th May, 2010, a payment of US$435,000 was made by Harlequin to ICE Group.
37. On 18th May, 2010, a meeting took place at Harlequin’s offices in Basildon. By this time, the plaintiffs were extremely concerned about the lack of progress on the development and felt they had been misled. Desperate to ensure that an opening could proceed on 1st July, 2010, Mr. Ames agreed that the plaintiffs would make seven payments of US$1m per week to the ICE Group. On the day following the meeting, Harlequin paid US$1m to the ICE Group, and on 27th May, 2010, they paid another US$1m. That was the last payment made before the ICE Group was dismissed from the site.
38. Mr. Paul Jacobs, in his report and evidence, stated that from August 2008 until June 2010, payments of US$9,942,633.59 were made from ICE Group bank accounts in respect of matters which the plaintiffs claim were totally unrelated to the Buccament Bay project. These included monies spent in relation to the purchase of a jet aircraft, the purchase of a Hertz franchise in St. Lucia, the purchase of racetrack and the purchase of a quarry in SVG. There were also monies paid in respect of a Romanian ski resort project in which the first named defendant was involved with Mr. Noel Tynan. The first named defendant maintains that some of these payments were for the benefit of the Buccament Bay project, for example, the purchase of a jet aircraft and the quarry. He sought to justify the purchase of the jet aircraft on the basis that there was no scheduled air service between the Caribbean Islands and other destinations where the first named defendant was required to travel on Harlequin related business. With regard to the quarry, the first named defendant claims that this was a purchase which would save costs in the sourcing of raw material for use on the Buccament Bay building project.
easy when its not your money you daft twat… and when the money stopped coming in?
TS we know you are employed by Harlequin and that you are not an investor. But hey you think we is Mr. Newman. Difference is we will prove it.
As for the freezing order applied for by Mr. Fatchett, now TS, did not Mr. Ames settle with Mr. Fatchett ahead of the freezing order being applied for.?
Yes he did. And the court ordered in a sealed order that Mr Fatchett’s clients be compensated.
See TS Mr. Fatchett won. Which begs the question whether Ames ever did actually compensate his clients.
We are sure Mr. Fatchett will enlighten us soon.
And as for the anonymous dodgy website you accuse us of using. Tis the same dodgy website that you have used earlier to post up the Basildon Echo newspaper article.
Its so simple to use TS isn’t it.
TS it might be simpler to post a link to the judgement website and direct the attention of those interested to the para numbers.
Harlequin Won, of that there is no doubt.
But we think the readers and more importantly the purchasers are more interested in the evidence, or to coin a phrase from the judge the persuasive evidence that demonstrates that Harlequin were trading insolvently.
The not so public documents. The issues the judge found to be peripheral to the case.
The issues of solvency raised during the security costs stage of the Irish case.
We will make these documents available and more. The without prejudice stuff too.
Feel free to call us Bradley Newman or Jeremy Manning. Run to ELS beg them to obtain a super injunction, post photos of houses, do what you have to do.
But we will upload the not so public documents. Hopefully purchasers may be able to use this evidence to make personal claims not only against the Ames family but also Simon Terry, Dan Dalligan, Katherine Manderfield, Simon Taylor, Garret Ronan and anyone else who was complicit in the miss selling when they knew Harlequin was insolvent.
I have caught Ralph Newman in a lie time and again today. It is getting rather boring.
@Ralph Newman, a link was put on here 12 aug 12.03. That something that was actually put up rather than ” we will put this up later. Blah blah blah
TS the definition of insolvency is the inability to pay debts as they fall due. The defence documents etc which we will post will clearly show that there was a serious problem with the solvency of Harlequin.
The defendants will claim that Harlequin were unable to pay them as per the oral contract with Harlequin.
In addition by the date to which you very kindly refer the readers to the para’s in the judgement Harlequin had been in default of 100’s of purchaser contracts.
You do not seem to understand the difference between cash flow and solvency or insolvency in Harlequin’s case.
Harlequin relied on sales to maintain cash flows, but had little or no cash in reserves as we will demonstrate from Harlequin’s management accounts.
For example Harlequin borrowed the money purchasers had given them for units in Barbados (Merricks) St. Lucia, Dom Rep and Brazik to provide the cash flows for the development of the Buccament Bay Resort. But Harlequin were contractually obligated to complete units on Merricks, Dom Rep etc. at the same time but did not have the cash to do so. See it was all being used on Buccament Bay.
In a nut shell Harlequin did not have the cash reserves to complete as per their contractual obligations a situation which pertains to this day.
So please TS stop acting like a Moron. And stop treating purchasers like idiots.
The Irish judge did not feel that the solvency issues of Harlequin were relevant to the Irish proceedings and as a consequence did not deal with them.
Now TS will you and FDNRM Bob stop miss leading and lying to purchasers
Purchasers are about to loose a hell of a lot and need information which will assist them in making their decisions pertaining to their investments.
TS maybe you should let others decide who is lying. And if its getting rather boring why engage with us.
Bob we can’t help but notice that you have toned down your rhetoric. Busy packing or did something else happen per chance?
On second thoughts don’t bother to answer.
@Ralph Newman, yes we all understand the “difference between cash flow and solvency or insolvency”
And I quote paragraph 31 for the judgement “Having considered the evidence available to him, including the figures provided by BCQS in a report, Mr. Jacobs concluded that the ICE Group was effectively insolvent at the time of the termination of their contract by Harlequin.”
Any you being a tax planner Jeremy Tut Tut. Sure its not a party planner for Tupaware?
@TS 1.30 pm…I may be stupid but it seems Ames was even more stupid.
After hearing the garbage O`Hallaron was spouting, and seeing his stupid fat face, he would not have gotten a penny from me, far less 50 + million Pounds….and without a written contract! Its more than stupidity I think.
Bob purchasers are probably going to loose their life savings. Harlequin won the Irish case.
The purchasers know this. They don’t care about the insolvency of ICE group. We don’t care.
We along with the purchasers care about the solvency of Harlequin.
The Irish case is over. Harlequin won. Now purchasers want to know how they are going to get their money back.
Now fuck of to France you imbecilic moronic fool lol and let us get on with looking for solutions.
what was the deal with the BBC reporter and expose’ program getting squelched? how much of the investors money was used to pay off judges, lawyers, PI’s and other lackeys? any answers from the peanut galleries?
and ….where is Gary Player and is golf course endorsement for Harlequin?
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm…………………………….
@Ralph Newman, ooh who has rattled your cage then. Temper temper, have you learnt how to spell GARETH yet? Oh and by the way your new company is not going to do much business without a contact telephone number or e mail. Just a little tip to a failed tax planner.
@ Bob ‘without a few Bob’ – How is your title and £150,000?
Its gone – Ames will shit on you you stupid old fool……… you think he will look after you – I pity you.
Bob we caveated our fuck off with an lol. So again fuck off Bob, lol, your a thief, a fraudster, (see you never declared your investment return to hmrc, Ames told you not too), a liar, oh yeah thick, but saddest of all you and TS will try and justify why Ames should not be held responsible for the thousands of people who will loose everything.
Ok Bob now go to France and carry on gloating that Ames’s ponzi scheme paid for it. And go choke on a few Escargot.
Le cerveau il etait en option chez toi
Comprend bien, tu parles a un con.
What would Jesus do ?
@ Short legs David shites in his face very often and he laps it up like a good puppy what a good little boy.
@Ralph Newman, it’s not the “familiar” tu, it’s vous to you. Just change the record, it really is getting so boring now.
We don’t seem to be able to get through to Bob so maybe we will get down to his level.
Hope you love spending investors money in France bob
when you get back we might just post up pics of your house and family so everyone will know you enjoyed spending purchasers money ha ha ha.
MORON we dont give a shit about anyone.
See Ames stole your money we don’t have to prove it. Ha ha we are going to France too.
We will just keep telling people Ames stole your money. And we are going to put your phone number up on the web and your mums
Its Ralph not Ralf idiot.
Ha ha lol
Thanks to TS for putting up the video of Paudie and DA on the beach…It shows and tells a lot about the people involved,as they tried to impress investors.
At one point Paudie says that because of the special blocks used (you can chop them in half with a machete) the apartments don`t need ac. DA chimes in that in Dubai, where the same blocks were used, they were freezing in January…..same thing.
Mean temp in SVG in Jan….85 degrees F
Mean Temp in Dubai in Jan…66 degrees F
Of course, the blocks will cause the temperature in SVG to drop about 20 degrees.
@Ralph, I don’t think anyone called you Ralf idiot, but I could understand why they would LOL
It was you Bob lol albeit TS probably reminded you that is was Ralph. Lol
We are just taking the piss out of you. TS is getting bored now so are you lol. Is TS going France with you? Go on fuck off you fool. Lol
@Ralph, and do you not think we are taking the piss out of you. Don’t tell me, you will post the answers on the Internet later. Have you learnt how to spell GF name yet?
Bob we know you are taking the piss. We acknowledge that. You and TS take the piss out of us out of purchasers out of everything. Because you don’t care.
RL twitter feed announces Matt Ames 3 week trial at Old Bailey from 9th sept. That’s one of the Ames’s out of the game, leaving Dave only.
September will be a bad month for the Ames family.
@Ralph Newman, of course I care about you. Anyone who is about to lose their home, have lost their job and forced into the entertainment business deserves some sympathy. Lol
So Mr Ames is employing his son Matthew, to be a “fresh pair of eyes” at Buccament Bay even though he is being prosecuted for fraud.
That tells you everything you need to know about Harlequin.
The company is responsible to its investors for the use of their money and for ensuring a return on it and it employs someone with that track record!
That is scandalous.
I think Mr Ames has got away with so much that he is now at the point where he doesn’t give a shit what anyone thinks any more. No-one has managed to get anything to stick so far and he thinks he is invincible. He is continuing to feed the family coffers by selling the excess tiles and furniture at BB, to keep Matt in the manner to which he was accustomed when he was defrauding the Forestry For Life and Investors Club investors.
Don’t worry as a professional £400 million company I am sure they will find someone who can drive round all day on a golf buggy lording it over the natives.
Good point SGD, despite all of the web comments, press reports, investigations and accusations absolutely nobody has managed to make a single thing stick – no wonder he thinks he’s invincible, perhaps he is invincible!
If any anybody needs to contact the old fool Bob I will give you his number 07825 ****** but to keep it interesting I will give a number out every time Bob posts an insulting arrogant post to other investors. We will all have his contact details within the hour!
740*****
oh fer feck’s sake stop messing abut.
(024) 7634 2096
mister bob le knob
7 Tiverton Dv, Nuneaton, CV11 6YJ
do ya wanna pic of his house as well? its the one on the corner with the blue car. try google maps.
Grow up you are like kids in a playground. Think I will have a chat with Joe tomorrow. @private dick, oh dear oh dear are you in trouble now matey.
ah is quakin’ in me boots mon
lol at mister bob le knob
@ FDNRM When are you leaving us to go to France? The sooner the better twat!
Make sure you give Bob a call or a text on 07825 740788 tell him what you think of him gloating at investors paying for his holiday!
Well now you have published my address, you think, I had better get the police involved now who is the twat.
roulant sur le sol en riant
Cher monsewer bob le knob
vous êtes un cafard
Grow a pair Bob Le Knob – stop whining – take a leaf out of your mate Mr Richard Inghams book! He had his personal details splashed all over the forum by Erica but to his credit he never cried like a big soft girl!
You dished it out – put Newmans and Macs details on here including pictures of houses but don’t like it when it happens to you, so how you like a dose back? Make sure you mention you did the same thing to others when you call the police.
And bob don’t buy a fecking bird table ………….
Bob mate it wasn’t us who put your number. Its another Ralph. Maybe it was TS masquerading as us. Maybe it was you masquerading as us.
Maybe you have been attacking you.?
By the way who is Joe? Has any one any idea who Joe is? Anyone got a number for Joe?
here ya go Bob le Knob a 10 minute walk from your house i’d say
Nuneaton Police Station Vicarage St, Nuneaton CV11 4DW
024 7664 1111
Richard what has a bird table got to do with Bob thinking he is Ralph. Richard who’s Joe? Is Joe Ralph?. Is Ralph Bob? Is Ralph Ralph.? Is Bob Joe? Richard we need a PI. Do you have Joe’s number Richard. ?
Where’s Jeremy?
It will be on the SFO website – cant trust any of that Harlequin lot , running to plod hoping for a reduced sentence are we Bobby??
Enjoy your holiday
Bob you claim to be so well connected with the authorities, you have been talking about who you claim to be witnesses in a serious criminal investigation. Go tell the police that Bob, go tell the Police that Mac Donald and Newman are liars and wasting the authorities time. Go tell the Police, that the great Poobah says that Newman is a liar. You have their addresses add that to your complaint.
Go tell the Police that Mrs Mac Donald is not dead, you found her house remember.
Tell the Police that you are a puppet for the Ameless one and your special mission is to spread lies and miss information to purchasers.
Wackjob. Now fuck off to France and don’t bother coming back. Weirdo.
Bob don’t forget to bring the Irish Judgement with you to the plods. Don’t forget to highlight the sections where Jeremy is guilty of fraud . Throw in the section on armed robbery and intent as well.
Don’t forget to tell the plods that you discovered that it was Newman who was in the book depository while you and Ameless where sitting on the grassy knoll trying to sell Lee Oswald a time share in Moscow on that faithful day in November 22 1963.
Newman was trying to get Ameless because he knew Ameless would win the defamation case 50 years later. Newman missed and hit some guy called John instead who just happened to be driving by at the time.
You know this cause you discovered that Newman has an interest in WWII from his linkedin page.
You stumbled upon the secret love affair Newman was having with Erica when Richard Ingham radioed in that he spotted Newman’s pet German Eagle eating a bacon butty on Erica’s new bird table. The reference to the Bird table gave that one away. (Given Newman’s interest in all things German)
May as well get Newman’s contact details from the plods so you can put then up here given all you have discovered about the evil
Fraudster and defamator. You have been dying to put his contact details up here all week to demonstrate to your master, Poohbah Ameless how in awe of Ameless you are.
Bob you are a liar, a hyoocrite, a bully, a coward and a fantasist.
You can give loads but you sure can’t take it. Now piss off back under the rock you crawled out from.
Jeez – Ralph you are beginning to sound like the new Ionesco
or Beckett. Keep it up. I am fascinated!
How many Ralph’s are there? I know we are a we but this takes the biscuit lol
Having invested in Harlequin and having met the Ameless one we are depicting the solitude and insignificance of human existence.
FDNRM you deserve all this shit you cum bucket.
Matt your off to the nick
Dave Ames and the old hag it’s over – you said it was worth it – was it?
@fdnrm the naming of your address was a touch out of order, but do you think you will be able to enjoy your trip to France knowing there are a lot of upset people wanting to ask you why you are going to France with their money…oh and as they know who you are now may just call round after all you have been inviting people to pop in all week on this forum to discuss HP/DA matters
Funny old world at times
@Ralph, Christ Jezza you have lost the plot big time. By the way I am in France at the moment. And I only invited Ralph round.
liar
you are in nuneaton
@Ralph Newman, I think you should go back to August the 12th. with you “hypothetical” question. Thats when YOU started naming names. So sorry but you have started this shit and I will finish it.
@Private Dick, Dick is very appropriate. You have not got a clue. Google and 192,com can be your friend, it you know how to use it. And you dont.
Jeremy Newman showing that a cornered Chihuahua is likely to bite. FDNRM obviously rattled someone!
The ICAEW have files open on Newman and MacDonald so not long until they are struck off as accountants. No wonder Jeremy is looking to start a puppet show with Jane.
FDNRM the word is that Wilkins Kennedy AND Paudie O’Halloran have cut off ties with Jeremy Newman because they see him as a liability. Newman’s Harlecon antics has ruined Kelltek before it began and forced WK into a position where they will have to make a HUGE pay out. That might explain why he is so cranky. He is all alone in the world apart from his teddy bears.
@Private (very little) Dick. Just been told of a withheld call to my home phone today. You might find that 6222082013 will mean something to you soon.
@Private (very little) Dick. Regretting your actions now. You have gone very quiet.
TS when will Harlequin begin work on the construction of the resorts?
Harlequin stated previously that mortgage interest payments would be reinstated by now why has this not happened?
When are Mr. and Mrs. Ames back in court regarding the freezing of their assets?
When is the defamation case going ahead?
Why are Mr. and Mrs. Ames assets still frozen?
Are the authorities still investigating Harlequin?
What’s your view on Matt Ames is he scum too?
Were his bail conditions changed?
Why has Mr. Mac Donald not been sacked or suspended?
Why have you not mentioned RLB’s role in the fraud?
In a letter Ames sent to the BBC in response to a BBC allegation that Ames bribed government officials in the Dominican Republic. Ames denied it saying instead that it was Mac Donald. What has been done about this.
In 2008 the Ames family including son Dan and son Matt all moved into luxury detached homes having all lived in 19 Cleres Crescent Wickford. Carol Ames also began investing in commercial property in the UK where did this money come from?
TS why have Harlequin not commenced the professional negligence claim against Wilkins Kennedy. Its been 3 years now since Harlequin first mentioned this.
Re the Defamation, Wilkins Kennedy et Al. Why is Ames desperately seeking a confidential settlement on the defamation case.
Why have Harlequin delayed matters on the defamation claim by in excess of 6 months?
“Richard what has a bird table got to do with Bob thinking he is Ralph. Richard who’s Joe? Is Joe Ralph?. Is Ralph Bob? Is Ralph Ralph.? Is Bob Joe? Richard we need a PI. Do you have Joe’s number Richard. ?”
That’s the best laugh I’ve had in ages, and sums things up nicely!
Ingham can be the P.I he has previous for this !!!
Bob puts up a hookey police number …… To pretend he made a report to plod joe from the sfo.
Ralph is an international man of mystery …. Dying to publish the truth but can find his password for harleleaks and can’t get in touch with Assange.
” what if the Hokey Cokey really is what it’s all about “
Good things come to those who wait Jeremy. Apart from you of course. All you have to look forward to is being ruined.
@RH LOL Nice try but miles off the mark.
oh go and choke on some snails fdnrm you pathetic bully
@Private (very little ) Dick. As they say on here Tick Tock Tick Tock
Is the number that Simpleton Bob is bandying around supposed to be a crime number?
If so, someone should point out to him that posting another person’s address and phone number online is not against the law. By all means it can be reported to the police and the reporter may even receive a crime number but the person responsible will have no case to answer.
The reporter will be wasting police time in much the same way as the Erica/PI situation over which Bob got so upset. Another shining example of Simpleton Bob’s blatant hypocrisy.
@Anon 12.35, Keep up to date gormless. Blocked calls are. Especially if the received feels they are of a “threatening ” nature. Out of my hands now. Where is Private “little” Dick? Been reduced to the ranks?
Is it not possible that the blocked caller was a cold-caller? You could have missed out on a great deal on a new mobile phone!
I assume you mean you got a blocked call on your mobile as you’re out of the country, in which case a blocked ID is to be expected as it’s an overseas call.
And how do you know it was Private Dick? And did you report him to Nuneaton police or a local policier?
Aww does Bobbies Helmet feel threatened? Who would hit an OAP?
Aww does bobbies helmet feel threatened now he’s not anonymous anymore? Regretting inviting people around for tea you retard?
Your at home not on France that’s why you picked up your home phone!
Maybe it was an ironing service to collect your work shirts – then again why would a work shy scrounging tosser who cant fill out a tax return properlyhave shirts for that purpose?
Sorry Simpleton Bob, I was not aware that the situation had escalated and that you’d now in fact received a “blocked call”. I assume that Special Branch have now been called in? And I suspect that given the international dimension Interpol will have needed to get involved. Perhaps even MI6? I suppose that Cabinet Office Briefing Room A will be in session this afternoon. Stop all the clocks – Simpleton Bob, a 64 year part-time internet troll, full-time loser from Nuneaton has received a blocked call.
That’s unfair Anon. As FDNRM said, it isn’t the call itself but how threatened the recipient feels. I can speak from experience as I get about 14 blocked calls a day and am constantly shitting myself.
Stop press . Cameron moves U.K defence status to def con 1 after blocked call received on Nuneatons mans mobile .Parliment recalled to discuss .
Out of my hands now, we will see who the Anon caller was then.
I had a blocked call the other day. It was from my Doctor. I also had a couple of unblocked calls from my bank trying to get me to take on a credit card.
Funny old world!
Harlequin did call off blocked numbers from what I remember so maybe David is calling to tell you he is giving you your title? I’ve got a title for you Sir Wank A Lot! Twat!
I just had my 3rd blocked ID call of the day. I don’t know which one of you it is but you’re sick and I’ve had enough. One more call and I promise you a Cobra meeting will be called and you will be dealt with.
meanwhile the clock ticks on and Ames can cover more of his crooked fraud tracks…people you need to move in and take action or everything will be hidden away
@fdnrm you seem to be digging a deeper hole every day….you are obviously in on the fraud so a room with bars may have your name on it also
Now you Know how WTF felt like………..
You know this obsession ended up sending the Wigan Bunker to the nut house – you will follow soon
Bob, you are on holiday & I guess Mrs Bob is a little bit pissed at you always fiddling with your I pad – try and keep off it for the duration of your holiday to proove to yourself your not obsessed?
Bet you can’t you have caught the ‘ Erica syndrome’
Aye, Fatty Matty – who will look after BB when you are in court from 9th September for 3 weeks?
😉
Maybe FDNRM could nip over?
@fat matt fdnrm cant nip as the last time he visited he had to pay for his own meals…..can you claim benefit when out of the uk
Was that Paul Walton and Richard Ingham seen at Buccament Bay last week?
FDNRM is David paying for your holiday also? Twat!
TS has not responded to any of the questions posed to him/her/it today pertaining to Harlequin. Questions purchasers would like answers to.
Mr. and Mrs. Ames, their youngest son Dan and Heir apparent to the throne Matt Ames are finished. There are assets in the UK, Caribbean, Australia, Dubai and Thailand paid for by money “STOLEN” from purchasers.
The Ames’s daughter Nicola Kelliher, lives in the town of Wandering Australia, Wandering is located close to Perth. Mummy and Daddy Ames have in the past been sending large amounts of cash ” Purchasers” money to Nicola for safe keeping.
Nicola met her Australian Husband a wealthy Australian rancher after Daddy Ames encouraged her to partake in a reality TV program called desperately seeking Sheila. Daddy Ames convinced Nicola’s husbands family to allow Daddy Ames sell properties on land owned by the Kellihers on Perth’s South coast. Property sold to UK purchasers.
Nicola despite having 3 kids is not happy with her life on the ranch and is on the phone to Mammy Ames on a daily basis. Indeed Mammy Ames makes frequent visits to Wandering to be with her daughter and to make cash runs.
When Daddy Ames was looking for 5 star suppliers for his 5 star + Resorts in the Caribbean he scoured the world for producers of the finest ingredients.
When he was looking for the world’s finest wines again he scoured the world eventually stumbling across one of the world’s finest vineyards and he asked them to produce wine for his resorts.
This vineyard was located in ….you got it Wandering Australia. Wandering has a population including the Nicola family of circa 30 people.
Mummy and Daddy Ames have personal freezing orders against them yet have access to as much cash as they need. Mummy and Daddy saw what was coming so got Danny to stash cash for them in his and his wife’s accounts.
Danny has been making a larger number of cash withdrawals recently then normal. In fact the rate at which the cash withdrawals increased corresponded with the freezing orders having been obtained against Mummy and Daddy Ames.
Yeah , he probably was a wealthy guy till he met the Ames family now he is the proud owner of feck all ……. Poor bastard can’t even get pissed cos the vineyard is bust
We have received emails from a number of purchasers with Questions. We will we answering all questions on this site. Please keep the questions coming they will all be answered.
Freezing orders were obtained successfully against Mr. and Mrs. Ames’s assets. We will hope to provide enough information to allow purchasers seek similar redress against Daniel Ames and his wife and Nicola Kelliher and possibly her husband.
thanks Ralph. keep it coming. very informative ….now if the government will pay attention…..
It looks like the UK criminal courts are getting tougher against those convicted of fraud. You may remember Terence Shepherd who received a 7 year jail sentence for carrying out a £6m ticketing fraud around the Beijing Olympics. It was recently announced that he has been given an additional four years because he has not paid back the people he defrauded.
A salutary lesson for anyone who might be waiting to face a fraud trial at the Central Criminal Court.
According to my contact at BB Paul Walton & Richard Ingham were in St Vincent last week and not only visited BB but every location a proposed resort was planned.
It appears Richard Ingham met Paul Walton in Miami and then travelled to St Vincent. They were accompanied by a Senior Partner of Richard Inghams Construction Consultancy, a gentleman by the name of John McNally, who is an experienced Project Manager.
Does anybody – Particularly you Ralph, know why they were there – it can’t have been for a holiday I’m sure??
Anybody know, maybe the rescue plan Fatchett/ Walton/ Ingham that Ralph mentioned is doing something behind the scenes???
It sounds more like a feasibility inspection to put forward
a rescue plan. Well done, about time an investor showed up
to verify the reality.
The re-finance deal has collapsed at due diligence stage. This very evening.
I can supply you David Ames telephone number if you want to verify this.
Of course it collapsed at the due diligence stage. How could it not.
Harlequin have nowhere to turn to. There was only one deal on the table.
The suggestion is that a liquidation should occur in SVG with the assets been sold to a new company.
Some random thoughts…..earlier on BFP showed a video of David
Campion touting the eco/green friendliness of Merricks. Unfortunately
the same cannot be said for Buccament Bay with it’s imported
sand beach. Somewhere in Guyana there is an eco-disaster. God only
knows what dumping that sand at BB has done to the breeding
estuary. Plus absolutely no mention of foreign/exotic micro-organisms
that were introduced. Don’t get me started on sewage disposal.
The whole thing is such a disaster….
@Private (little) Dick Tick tock, Monday should be interesting for you.
fdnrm…..Monday should be interesting….don’t say, the banks are closed so you wont be able to withdraw the HP refund
I initially thought you were ok, now it seems you are a frightened old man who doesn’t know which way to run….I generally don’t wish people bad luck, but in your case I really do hope you get stuffed financially by HP after all you little back handed deals and I am alright Jack attitude
how is France btw
We see that Bob is oblivious to what’s going on around him.
Hickory dickory dock, bob you may as well run up the clock.When the clock strikes one, down Bob will come. Tick tock tick tock tick tock.
Good night Bob.
I am not an IT type. But if someone posted the lyrics to
“My Way” the poetry in that song would be apparent.
I don’t know how to do it…….
@Three For A Bob – Corn on the Cob – Bob you nob
Your nearly correct, they met David Campion and Mark Campion , Sean Ghent was the driver /body gaurd. But did not go to SVG
They then all went for a meal with Dave and Matt Ames, then Fatchett joined later on.
The Last Supper !!!
@Dave Ames Has Robbed Me
Of course he paid for the lot 3 weeks holiday, few days work. not bad work if you can get it 😉
We would ask that Mr. Fatchett does the decent thing and explain to all purchasers in Harlequin that at this stage his plans are to purchase some of the assets of Harlequin from the liquidators for his clients.
Mr. Walton and Mr. Ingham are / were working with Mr. Fatchett on “The Rescue Plan” Mr. Walton and Mr. Fatchett have also been working with Mr. David Campion former development director for Harlequin.
Mr. Walton and Mr. Ingham have no interest in any rescue plan as it pertains to purchasers interests. Their interest is in the financial gain they will benefit from as a result of project and contract management services they would have provided to the rescued Harlequin.
Mr. Campion was a director of Harlequin yet now through his new company seeks financial reward for any involvement in a rescue plan.
Mr. Ingham is also a friend and supporter of the Ames family.
But as we have stated it appears now from the information we have that Mr. Fatchett intends to make an offer to the liquidators for some of the assets.
But Mr. Fatchett will only be doing this on behalf of his clients.
We believe however that Mr. Fatchett may have crossed the line here by giving purchasers who were not his clients the impression that a rescue plan would have included all purchasers. A type of fraudulent preference so to speak.
It is time that Mr. Fatchett stated publicly as to what his intentions are and who is included in any future “Rescue” plans or buy out. We will be seeking independent legal advice on the above for anyone with an interest in Harlequin.
Still going on for some!
Mr fatshit may need to be a bit careful here….funny how a share of £400million changes peoples position.
surely though any RL rescue plan would need investor approval including those not in bed with RL
Would be interesting to see where they are going with this….but rest assured RL are in the gravy train race , not coz there think a major fraud has been commited and they feel they would like to assist theres a lot of snouts in the trough from bobbie boy to ames all fingers in the kitty
the whole HP thing and the law is disgraceful
Fatchett threatened to go to court to obtain a freezing order over Harlequin’s assets in Feb / March 2013. TS referred to this. Ames however did a deal with Fatchett not in court but on the steps of the court house. Fatchett did not get the deal supervised by the court. Instead he accepted Ames’s offer to sell some properties in Dubai in order to pay Fatchetts clients.
The Dubai deal did not happen and given that Fatchett had not had the agreement ratified by the court, Fatchett had no recourse and rolled this group of purchasers into his “Rescue” plans.
This was about May 2013.
It was by this stage that it should have become apparent that any rescue plan would only benefit his clients.
Fatchett made statements like ” A rescue plan will require 70% of purchasers to agree” etc etc etc.
Purchasers as a result of such statements and who were not clients of Fatchett took comfort in these statements.
But one just needs to consider the following.
(A) Fatchett claims to have circa 500 clients.
(B) These clients have paid Fatchett to represent them.
(C) The other circa 4500 purchasers are not clients of Fatchetts.
(D) What has Fatchett achieved for his clients. Ames reneged on his deal re the Dubai properties. Ames has publicly rebuked Fatchett on numerous occasions.
Fatchett instigated a large number of statutory demand proceedings in the Caribbean but never followed them through to there conclusion. If he had done so he would have precipitated the collapse of Harlequin and he would have had to explain to all purchasers the reasoning behind his actions given that he was representing himself as champion of all purchasers not just his clients with respect to a rescue plan.
(E) Fatchett was also aware that the debt burden being carried by Harlequin was too much for purchasers to carry unless all purchasers 100% of them bought into the idea of a rescue plan.
(F) Fatchett knew that a CVA would be highly unlikely as it pertained to HMMSE and the Caribbean companies. And even if a CVA was possible Fatchett knew that unless he had the full support of the purchasers 100% he ran the risk that if some of the purchasers who did not buy into the rescue plans were to seek recovery of their monies by way of a stat demand this would have had the effect of tipping Harlequin’s resort development companies into liquidation.
(G) Fatchett knows the authorities are continuing their investigations into Harlequin. Fatchett knows that Harlequin will soon be capitulated into liquidation. He is aware that all financing options have come to nothing.
(H) Fatchett has a good number of High Net Worth individuals (clients) who are willing to invest further in the Harlequin product.
(I) But these individuals given their readiness to invest are doing so to protect their investments and not those of others certainly not those who are not clients of Nr. Fatchetts.
(J) Fatchett began to encourage SIPP investors to make claims against IFA’s and Agents. In doing this Fatchett knew there could be no rescue plan. Fatchett knew that by claiming against IFA’s their insurers would take the purchasers contracts and pursue Harlequin for the funds paid out in claims. If the company was rescued by Fatchett and Co. This would mean the IFA’s insurer’s would be suing Fatchett.
(K) Fatchett has known for some time now that a rescue plan was not feasible yet RL and Fatchett have possibly prevented purchasers who were not his clients from taking different actions.
(L) Fatchett has been buying time in order to ascertain the best and most economically viable option for his clients.
(M) Fatchett knows from the information he has that Ames has committed a number of criminal acts and that as a result, Harlequin will be forced into liquidation. All bets will then be off. And Fatchett will take his circa 500 purchasers and try to purchase some of the assets from the liquidator.
(N) Fatchett originally expected to find Harlequin was holding a large cash reserve but discovered that this was not the case.
(O) It is our opinion that Fatchett may have miss lead purchasers who were not clients of his. Why would fee paying clients expect that non clients people who haven’t paid would share in any rescue package put together by their solicitor.
What extra benefit was accrued by Fatchetts fee paying clients if all purchasers were to benefit from a rescue package.?
It makes absolutely no sense.
Its now time that Fatchett came clean with all purchasers. Non clients of Fatchett will be left high and dry. We would ask purchasers who are not clients of Fatchett to run this hypothesis if you want to call it this by their own solicitors.
We are just here to try and help purchasers understand what may well be happening.
Fatchett has made public statements recently pertaining to Harlequin which he knew were False.
He has our email we challenge him to disprove this.
We believe that purchasers in Harlequin could have a genuine cause of action against Fatchett, furthermore we believe that Fatchett knows this too.
One thing is certain the actions of the Ames family destroys the lives of EVERYONE who comes into contact with them.
Have purchasers ever wondered why despite the very public attacks by Harlequin and Ames on Fatchett that Fatchett continues to entertain him?
Fatchett has talked about a rescue plan for months but nothing has been achieved to date.
We have had release after release from Fatchett which keeps extending dead lines for Ames. These deadlines oddly enough coincide with separate actions being taken either by or against Harlequin.
We have observed this trend and its no coincidence.
Fatchett will not be the one who precipitates the collapse of Harlequin. To do so would put him in the direct firing line of Harlequin.
He needs some third party to instigate the collapse of Harlequin. Then he can claim that only for someone else instigating the collapse of Harlequin a rescue plan could have been successful. “Wasn’t my fault gov”. Then surprise surprise 500 clients move in and purchase the assets of Harlequin for a song headed up by Fatchett leaving 4500 purchases swinging in the wind. And to add insult to injury those 500 purchasers will still have a claim against the liquidator like any other unsecured creditor.
Further more any liquidator will require a block vote to be appointed oddly enough Fatchett has one in the form of his 500 clients, but we do have a solution to this and will discuss when events become clearer.
We will not allow Fatchett an easy ride with respect to the appointment of a liquidator. That we promise you.
It seems that everyone is scrambling to get a piece of the pie but isn’t it the sad truth that there is no pie left to be had.
The even sadder thing is to see who is brushing pie crumbs from the corners of his mouth while he lets out one enormous belch in the purchasers’ faces.
I just hope he can’t refuse the wafer thin mint when it is offered to him.
Jeremy Newman apparently exists in a fantasy land where he can lie brazenly and fail to answer any questions and STILL expect answers to his questions. What a irrational fool but it is expected.
Ralph has dug a hole he cannot escape. These rambling posts are the death rattle of Jeremy Newman who was shunned by O’Halloran after he failed to support his business partner in court. That is why Kelltek is already dead in the water and Galaxy Entertainment has appeared.
“Nuffin to do with me guv” was Newman’s plea in court. Explaining why O’Halloran had bought a private jet for building Buccament was even beyond Newman’s lying ability.
Now on with the Harlecon show with supporting acts who are not even investors.
Ralph – now I am confused the Fatchett/ Ingham/ Ames/ Walton/ Campion trip around the sites a few weeks back, what was it about?
Was it for the benefit of those who attended or to seek a positive outcome for all the investors?
Was it paid for by Harlequin as LLMITB states?
TS / Harlequin maybe you cannot get this into your thick skull but WE are not Jeremy Newman.
Ralph – the RL investor deal has been agreed with Ames.
Why should RL protect people who they don’t act for ?
Why should the RL team not go to the resorts to do their due diligence ?
Also, being blunt, why should RL help people who are too stupid to help themselves ?
@ blunt . Your absolutely correct , lawyers act for their paying clients they are not responsible for the masses. Excellent news btw .
@Richard Hannay
Ralph’s Rant – I have been watching Ralph and trying to work out where he / she is coming from. I do not think he is Newman or Newman linked.
Newman and RL have no beef with each other. So Ralph would not attack RL.
Ralph is not a Harlequin person as they benefit from the deal. Additionally, he attacks Ingham and FDNRM who are Ames disciples.
So, Ralph – who exactly do you represent ?
Blunt – I do not think Ralph has attacked me and I certainly don’t feel attacked.
Why would he what have I done?
http://sevencapital.co.uk/hospitality/overview
Ladies and Gentleman – your proposed new owner.
Ps – your investments will be truly worthless unless the venture capitalists are running things as a charity.
Walton is an investor and is a client of Farchett. Richard Ingham claims to be a construction consultant of some sort. Although we know that Walton has questioned Ingham’s claims regarding his consultancy business.
Ingham is a strong supporter of Ames as is Csmpion. Mark Campion, David Campion’s brother was still employed by Ames up to a few weeks ago. David Campion’s firm Argo was established with funds from Ames.
Ingham and Walton are using Campion for his possible knowledge of the projects. This is not the first meeting Fatchett, Campion, Walton and Ingham had. On the 18th of July for example Campion met with Fatchett, Ingham and Walton in the UK.
Campion then travelled on to Ireland to meet with some external backers.
We also have rather bizarre emails from Sean Ghent which we have seen where Ghent and Ingham are suggesting that given their close personal relationship with Ames they will be able to get Ames to hand control of Harlequin to Fatchett, Walton, Ingham and Co. and walk away.
Ingham, Walton and Campion from information we have are hoping to control the construction and completion of the resorts.
If Fatchet is really working for the interest of all purchasers and not just his clients and if he intends to include all purchasers and not just his clients in any plans to purchase Harlequin’s assets from a liquidator why does he not come out and state this.
He needs to state if all purchasers are to be included in his rescue plan and will this necessitate that they become clients of his and will it necessitate that they will be required to provide additional funding.
Fatchett needs to state openly the role Walton, Ingham, Ghent, Campion and indeed Ames amongst others have to play in any rescue plan.
Fatchett needs to explain how any rescue plan would be managed and what say purchasers will have in management roles as it appears that senior management roles are already being carved out by certain individuals.
Fatchett will need to state how class A and class B shareholders will be appointed. And who will decide who is to be class A and class B shareholders.
So many questions, its time Fatchett made a statement on matters as they pertain to all purchasers not just his clients.
Ralph – I will not comment on the statement you have made as I am not going to get into the argument, although I will state alot of it is inaccurate.
What I will comment on is that there is no question mark about my business as a Construction Cost Consultancy, it has been trading now for 8 years and is bona fide – the question mark that you refer to was created by Erica Broughton stating I was a PI – Paul Walton repeated this concern knowing no better – Paul Walton has now seen the business for himself and there is no issues.
Just say your right and I was at BB, which I am not saying is right, why would Paul Walton be there with a Project Manager from my business if there were concerns over the business?
Whatsthefuss We thank you for your clarification with respect to your business and we are willing and happy to accept your explanation.
The information we have obtained demonstrated to us that you had a wish or desire, if you wish us to word it in that way, to be involved in possible future construction activities with respect to Harlequin in the Caribbean. We should state that had that been your desire or wish there was absolutely nothing illegal or wrong in that. And of course you are totally within your rights to correct us on this matter.
Our reference to you, Mr. Walton and others was based on a statement made on this forum that you all had a meeting recently in the US and Caribbean. We did not state that this was indeed a fact. We stated that you did all meet in the UK in July, this was as per details provided by Mr. Campion himself. Indeed there was nothing wrong in having that meeting. Nothing wrong at all.
But again if you wish to clarify the matters surrounding this meeting we will stand corrected.
I think we all agree that it is time Mr. Fatchett made a statement on the matters raised, if indeed he seeks to assist all of the purchasers with respect to any rescue plan ir buy out.
If however Mr. Fatchett’s plans only involve his clients then quite frankly there will be no obligation on him to keep anybody but his clients updated.
However given the uncertainty surrounding who Mr. Fatchett is ultimately representing with respect to a rescue plan we would ask him to make this perfectly clear to all purchasers.
We wish to make this clear to everyone, our references to wtf and Walton et al is based on information we have obtained. We respect and take on board what wtf has to say on the matter. And we wish to point out that we have no bones to pick with wtf.
It is s pity that wtf is not willing or possibly not able to shed any further light on the issues raised. You have to admit wtf that by stating that our information is inaccurate or incorrect without a substantive rebuttal, merely stating that we are wrong might raise more questions then answers.
However given the fact that you have made your position clear to us on the fact that you have no wish or desire to further expand on the issues raised, we will refrain from asking you to make any further comment to us on the issues raised. Nor will we refer to you in the future.
My R Legal contact has confirmed that Gareth Fatchett was in Europe when the supposed Caribbean gathering took place. More lies and nonsense from Ralph Newman!
WTF must be so delighted that Ralph is willing to accept his statement. I imagine we all crave acceptance from this anonymous “group” posting numerous lies, sharing files on a paedophile playground and only providing a Gmail address with “theequaliser101” as the name.
Clarification We fully stand by the accuracy of information we post on this site. However we will accept rational explanations provided by anyone with respect to issues raised.
For example we stated that Mr. Walton had questions pertaining to Mr. Ingham business Mr. Ingham stated that he had addressed those issues with Mr. Walton and given that we have no new information on the matter nor are we able to clarify the matter with Mr. Walton we accept what Mr. Ingham has to say on the matter.
@TS and WTF, I think we have all seen through Ralph Newman now. He is up till 2.15 in the morning racking his brain on make believe postings and then is “gracious” enough to believe you when he has it wrong. Now Garett (ops using Ralphs spelling now) Fatchett has got “questions to answer”.The arrogance of the man.
@Private Dick, clocks ticking. Monday not far away now.
So you fully stand by the fact that my name is Simon even though it is not and you have no evidence?
FDNRM I could not agree more but I do enjoy reminding readers from time to time about who he is and why he is here spewing lies from his 40in belly.
Now now Matt that’s a bit rude, you will loose yours in jail.
@TS if ever a man was showing signs of worry then this is it. By the way Raphael Vive & co LLP was another disaster for our man Jeremy. I wonder what the house will go for when it has to be sold?
TS you are a fool and an embarrassment to yourself and those you represent. You really are lol. But sadly you again have clearly not read nor do you understand our response nor did we suggest or state that Mr. Fatchett was in the Caribbean
But maybe given the fact that you are in contact with RL you could ask them to clarify the issues raised and maybe TS you could make a meaningful contribution to the debate.
You have refused to answer any questions put to you. You are not even humorous in your responses.
You also state that we upload files onto, or share files on paedophile playground.
We utilise the site anonfiles dot com
Strangely enough this is to use your own words the same site you use.
Just go back to your post of the 21st of August 2013 at 10.33 am, where you where so kind as to upload a file (A Basildon Newspaper Article) on the site anonfiles dot com.
So we suggest you go away you hypocritical fool. Just go away. Lol
FDNRM you may already know this but Jeremy have also been reported to the ICAEW. They have the judgment, court transcripts and everything.
The word is that he wants to throw in the towel but Wilkins Kennedy are turning the screw on him. His options are ruin or ruin. How to choose!
Hi Ralph,
I emailed you the other day and you haven’t replied. Get back to me please. Cheers!
@TS, hit a nerve there then Just waiting for my anti FDNRM rant from the idiot next.
@TS, yes I spoke to them the other day. You have to go onto their website and it tells you when cases are coming up next. If its an open hearing I might go for a day out and listen to Newman and MacDonald trying to explain themselves away.
Ralph assumptions make fools of us all and an even bigger tit of you. I did not upload it there I was directed to it by another investor.
But even if I had uploaded it there I do not claim to professionally represent “a number of clients” with an interest in Harlequin. Or have you changed your story now?
P.S. I was also directed to another file on there about you Jeremy but I have not decided to share it yet.
Quote TS
His options are ruin or ruin. How to choose!
Matt Jail and ruin
OAP Ames Jail and ruin
Ralph – the new structure will involve a Cayman company holding.
Trust will own the shares on behalf of the acquirers. The trust is going to be set up by Maples & Calder in Cayman.
Beneficiaries – clients of RL, GF personally, PW and Ames.
Finance – as above.
The irony that those investors who have taken action will benefit. Those who have followed the agents “do nothing” mantra will lose out.
9th September for 3 weeks – Fatty Matty, keep your diary clear.
Who will be looking after Buccament Bay whilst you are in the dock.
All those nasty investors saying you ran off with £1.6 million and spent it without a care in the world :)…… lies, sue the insolvency service…the police,anyone!!!
Mmmmmm I wonder where you got that idea from???
FDNRM you may be interested in the file I mentioned above. It is a photo and the good news for the Caribbean’s strict laws is that the evidence shows he is not a homosexual.
@Blunt.
is this just more BS or can you actually back this up? Its starting to get a little silly now.
Ralph,
Don’t you think naming people without proof is a bit dim?
You seem to suffer from the strange syndrome whereby, you only want to believe Machiavellian things about people or Harlequin? in HP case yes its mostly shit I agree.
lets get back on track, Seven Capital in or out?
Ames & Son – jail?
is the only option it going bust?if it is lets all prepare for the worst……
less speculation more facts?
@My Cabana worth £1
I have given you the parties, the name of the law firm, the jurisdiction and the structure. What else do you want ?
There will be no investor meetings. Just a note lamenting the liquidation of the Caribbean companies based in SVG.
Then there will be a buy out. You will not get a peep from either RL or Ames. They have done their deal.
Remember, PW and the HIG people are all going to be involved in the new arrangement. Why should they have any concern for the lost flock of sheep ?
Heh Bob when did you get back from France? You never answered who Joe was? Given that you talk freely about evidence witnesses have given to certain state agencies and refer to section 2’s etc. You may as well fill us in as to what Joe is planning to do on Monday. Or is it the local police? C’mon Bob.
Why did you not make a complaint about Mr. Newman?
And why bring WTF into your conversations, he has ably demonstrated that he was willing to engage with us and we with him on a mature level.
Now Bob you also have provided the name of a company. We can do that too ELS perhaps? Where did you get the Raphael whatever? Was it through a section 2 ?
And can you elaborate on that fascinating story. ?
Can you also tell us what date Mr. Newman’s Mr. Mac Donald’s and Wilkins Kennedys case (trial) is with the ICAEW ? We would all like to go. Hope it does not clash with Matthew’s criminal trial. Or Mr. and Mrs. Ames’s case?
TS I hope you can provide evidence that Mr. Newman is willing to throw in the towel because we will be only to willing to counter that argument with unequivocal evidence to back it up. So cmon now.
TS ref anonfiles we take it that you are referring to the very grainy image of a poor photo shop attempt at imposing Mr. Newman’s face on the body of a slim arab who with another arab is watching a woman gyrate on a pole.
The image you sent to Mrs. Newman’s wife twitter account perhaps?.
Go on you may as well post the link to it. We are all so excited. Lol
We will be posting photos of the Buccament Bay resort soon. But we will not photo shop them all though some could really do with it.
I could provide Ames mobile for you to confirm it.
Ps – which Ames mobile do you want. Matt, Carol, Dan, Dave ?
All of them ?
@Ralph, You really are guessing now aren’t you? So Mrs Newman has a wife? Thats interesting. Ralph you are sooo obvious. Any reference to Jeremy Newman and you jump right in with both feet. Perhaps I have made a complaint against Mr Newman, depends if he and Private Dick are the same person. Monday will reveal all.
PS I’m still in France.
Again with the lies Jeremy tut tut. Where is your evidence that I sent a file to your wife? I imagine it is in the same place as your evidence that I posted the file on your paedo playground.
Where is your evidence for anything for that matter? You still have not even proven that Ames sent the court transcripts to journalists despite saying you would two weeks ago.
P.S. If you look at the photo carefully you will see that you Jeremy Newman are sitting diagonally behind another gentleman of protected identity and that is why your gut is not in view. That is also why you can only see the outline of that gentleman’s body and not yours.
Thank you very much Mr. Blunt
A few questions
(1) Will a fair market price have been paid for the assets being acquired by the new trust.?
(2) Which independent firm will be valuing the assets?
(3) Have Shippley’s been made aware of the deal.
(4) If the liquidators find that the assets have not been purchased at fair value they will over turn the deal based on fraudulent preference.
(5) Where did Fatchett find the 150 million + to buy the assets Ames claims they are worth.
(6) Even though the deal is being done through the Cayman Islands there will be a money trail. Is Fatchett willing or happy to have conveyancing documents forged in all of the Jurisdictions in an attempt to cover their tracks. Wake up everyone if what Mr. Blunt is saying is correct Ames, Fatchett and Walton are about to take close to 4500 purchasers for in excess of 300 million.
(7) For this to work the resort development companies will be paid for the assets. Maybe its time the 4500 unsecured purchasers should prepare to instigate Stat Demands against the vendor RDC’s ?????
The Cayman Islands? So much for transparency. If its true. Fatchett cries about transparency. Yet hides the financials of the deal through the Cayman Islands.
Ralph – so what you are saying is that Fatchett/ Ames/ Ghent/ Ingham/ Walton/ Campion all met up but for what reason?
Also, are any of these people in the HIG group? Are the HIG group aware of what they are doing?
Mt. Blunt its ok we have the numbers. Bob we look forward to Monday morning. Lol TS we have already produced documents Ames sent to the press.
We are trying to assist purchasers but some contributors are not happy for us to do so.
So we might just take s break and leave it to Bob and TS to reassure all the purchasers out there.
@Three For A Bob – Corn on the Cob – Bob you nob
Fatchett/ Ames/ Ghent/ Ingham/ Walton/ Campion all met up but for what reason?
They did not ‘all’ meet up……. its not true.
Ralph, please prove it……… I have thrown down the gauntlet.
Three for a Bob …………. bob is a knob.
It was stated by others last night that all of the gentlemen had met up. There is some question mark today by others as to who was at this meeting and where this meeting was held.
Mr Blunt then stated that a deal has been done. So we are calling on the architects of the rescue plan to come out and state openly what that plan is and who benefits?
@ Blunt
You are a name that rhymes with Blunt and begins with C
Stop peddling lies and shit
Bro we did not state anything. We based our comments on “three for a knobs post at 8.43pm last night and your response at 11.07 pm.
Just wondering given that you made those statements why you wish to throw the “gauntlet down” We can confirm that Campion had a meeting with Fatchett, Walton and xxxxx in London in July.
@Blunt
All their mobile numbers to prove your not some sad troll, getting off on others misfortune.
@Blunt, when you say ‘Finance as above’ what do you mean exactly? Are investors going to have to part with more cash to make this float or is there an external financier involved?
I would really appreciate any news you have on this as it’s obviously a critical point. Thanks in advance.
Ralph,
Why would anyone share a secret deal ?
The terms will be unknown.
The valuation will follow the £1 FSA SIPP value. Therefore, the value will stand up to any scrutiny. They cannot be valuable and worthless at the same time.
Why do you think the investor meetings have not been announced by Harlequin ? No need.
TS, are you saying you have a picture of Newman at a strip club? Is that it all this photo is?
@ Ralph
You state Fatchett, Ames, Ghent, Ingram & Walton, etc. are ‘all’ involved in some covert operation to take over HP and make lots and lots of money, and all live happily ever after.
Can you prove any of this? pretty simple question?
Its just the same as me saying you are involved with Fatchett, Ames, Ghent, Ingram & Walton…… are you?
David Ames – 07960 958 720
No nonsense from me.
Equaliser simple answer “yup” but its not illegal, maybe immoral but not illegal.
Equaliser in answer to your second question “nope” and we never were.
And given that these gentlemen have done nothing illegal there is no need to provide proof.
However if it turns out they have we will provide everything we have to the authorities.
Well we might just leak some stuff on Ghent.
Just a thought, but wouldn’t Fatchett be risking his professional reputation by doing this? Or does it breach any professional regulations?
Blunt OK, gotcha, kind of, well actually not really. See the SIPP valuation has nothing to do with the market value of the properties.
It has more to do with the debt burden of the Business as it currently stands. And the current insolvent state of the Harlequin Group.
But the properties do have a value.The properties are not insolvent just Harlequin and the Ames’s.
Sid not me no but it is a photo from within a brothel shared by a source.
Ralph where are the court documents proving that all of the Harlequin companies are insolvent?
Sid Fatchett will be doing nothing wrong if the trust pays the true market value for the properties.
An independent valuer could value the properties and lands Fatchett wishes to purchase at possibly 150 million. So Fatchett would have to pay that.
If he did not pay the true market value or if he advised his clients not to do so. Then he would be in serious trouble.
Bob waffles on about section 2 orders. This is a case in point where those powers would be used to get the truth from Fatchett.
If the valuer values the assets at 20 million then the flood gates open on tge fraudulent miss representation claims by anyone associated with Harlequin.
Now interestingly if this is the route that Fatchett is going down then any purchaser not a part of the rescue package has the chance to go after Ames and the RDC’s who sell the assets.
Another option would be to seek freezing orders against Harlequin and the Ames’s ahead of the Fatchett deal being finalised.
If a number of investors get together who are not members or clients of Fatchetts then an exparte action taken not in St. Vincent but say the British Virgin Islands would work.
But we think it would be nice of Mr. Fatchett to tell everyone of his plans.
Thanks for the response Ralph. I can understand the need for absolute secrecy now.
I take it the 4,500 that aren’t on Fatchett’s books will be left to claim from the IFA’s etc. And if they aren’t Fatchett’s clients then I guess it’s right that they’re not his responsibility. Harsh yes, but we all know that’s the way the world spins.
To take you up on your earlier point, if the IFA insurers do pay the masses, can those insurers then go after HP if it has already been liquidated?
Ralph , why the BVI ? Gareth FAtchett doesn’t have to tell the people he isn’t representing what he is doing as it won’t involve them.
Bit of a pigs breakfast the whole sorry mess in my opinion
If they can’t and the 4,500 do get refunds via IFA claims, then the outcome isn’t so bad for the vast majority is it? 4,500 get their investment and walk away unscathed having learned a good lesson and 500 get the long term investment they put their money in to. Sounds like a workable solution to me….or am I being naive/simple (which I do very well)?
All in good time TS. Sid et al TS would like to share with everyone a photo Harlequin put up on a twitter account belonging to Mr. Newmans wife.
Its a very bad photo shop of Mr. Newman supposedly watching a pole dancer.
Sadly Simon Taylor of Harlequin Property forgot to clear the properties section of the same photo sent to the BBC. He made the same mistake with the surveillance photos sent to the BBC.
Now TS speaking of embarrassing individuals shall we talk about Mr. Pat Cash ??????? We are sure the tabloids would love that one.
In the grand scheme of things, I don’t think anyone would bat an eyelid of Newman watching a stripper. Sounds like he knows how to enjoy himself if you ask me!
Ralph, I would really appreciate it if you could answer my questions above.
Also, maybe I’ve missed something, but if Fatchett & Co. need to raise >£100m, where will it come from? It’s not exactly pocket change is it!
Ha ….. They will buy it on the cheap and there won’t be any claims for the poor saps who lost their pension or took a mortgage. Cest la vie branleur.
( last bits for fdnrm – because he bloody well does )
Richard there is always a trail always. Conveyancing documents, capital gains tax.etc etc.
Will Fatchett forge documents? Ames did. Will Fatchett bribe government officials? Ames did.
Richard you know what politicians are like?
They always like to uncover one scandal or another.
Sid whatever hope SIPP purchasers have of getting redress back in the UK cash purchasers have little or no hope.
And when the insurance under writers look into this and find that Fatchett was encouraging everyone to sue they might start to do a little digging. A 20k bung in the Cayman Islands will get many to talk.
Remember anyone who sues the IFA’s will have to surrender their contracts to the IFA’S insurers who will pursue Harlequin.
But back to my question, how can anyone pursue Harlequin if there is no Harlequin? They can’t pursue the new company can they? There will be nobody to sue if it all happens quickly enough.
Despite these conjectured machinations the government of SVG
retains the right of eminent domain/compulsary acquisition. What
about the tens of millions that Shipleys says are owed. I bet they could
nip in the bud any sort of midnight or clandestine re-organization.
Anonymous / Sid / Richard etc
Fatchett knows the investors would not be able to organise themselves. They are mainly half wits who bought because an equally half wit agent told them to buy.
Most had to re-mortgage their UK home to get the deposit together.
They will moan, they will cry, but they will do nothing.
The fire sale value is minimal. Why do you think Walton was sent to do a report ?
As for the IFA’s, they are toast. Fatchett will get the redress claims as part of the deal.
Investors get the money back, insurers get their investments. The insurers are left with useless contracts against broken Caribbean companies. They will pursue no one.
End result, Harlequin Mk2 gets rid of bulk of investors as unsecured creditors and Fatchett’s client get a debt free / claim free resort as their redress. Nice work if you can get it.
@Sid, it’s no good asking Ralph the troll anything. I know you would like some answers but you will not get anything from him. He tried to gain some credibility by posting stuff about me which we know where that came from. Now he has run out of facts and he is guessing and cannot substantiate any of his claims, never mind answer any questions.
Ralph,
IFA insurers will be left holding contracts with a bust company. Do you see the clever game being played now ?
There are some real suckers on this site. They cannot see the obvious.
FDNRM – I suspect you will wish Fatchett did represent you.
Ralph – he who dares etc
Sid – man of word, but not action
WTF – everyone’s favourite stalker
Paul Walton – the deal maker
A comedy / tragedy depending on where you sit.
Anonymous –
Ask yourself this . Who chose Shipleys ?
Yes, the Ames family. He who pays the piper etc …
Sounds so easy. Too easy.
Ralph,
It is not easy to do. However, it is being done. I cannot see Mr & Mrs Average wanting to fund the necessary legal actions in the Caribbean to prevent it. Do you ?
The insurer point was a new one on you wasn’t it ?
How does any of this preclude DA from being prosecuted
for fraud/ponzi ???
@blunt. Why would I wish that GF represented me. If I wanted him to I could drive round to his place, again, and get signed up.
@ralph, ELS? You live in fantisy land. You are just full of bullshit.
Matt Ames is going to jail
The latest release from RL tonight says it all.
“We are not in a position to confirm or deny any element of the speculation.”
“Suffice to say we work hard for an outcome which helps “our” clients.”
Looks like Fatchett is trying to steal the march here.
Blunt you might think Fatchett is the only game in town. His problems are only beginning.
It looks like this well be fraudulent preference.
@ Blunt the C***
Most did not remortgage you cock, most were SIPP., anyhow are you an investor or far to intelegent!
Amazing what you can read into a sentence, I read it as if your not my client why should I tell you.
The fire sale is the problem. Blunt I would not bet on the insurers sitting back. Not for a couple of 100 million.
There is one other little 4 letter problem lurking in the shadows.
SVG will want its pound of flesh too. Fatchett will not get the same easy ride Ames got. And as for your views on the purchasers well we can see what you mean when that little idiot FDNRM is brought into the equation.
But there are others out there who will not accept Fatchetts little plan.
Remember what RL just said tonight, they will do what’s best for their “Clients”.
There is one consolation Ames will not benefit from this and the poisoned chalice has been passed on.
Walton’s the “deal maker”? Isn’t Walton one of the half-wits who thought Harlequin was a must buy? What makes him Red Adair?
Anyone who thinks all this will end well with the IFA’s insurers paying out in most cases and Fatchett’s clients ending up with a prime investment is delusional.
@ralph ha ha. Ralphy Newman, you crack me up. Compared to your waist yes I am little.
The SIPP money accounts for about 50% of the sales. And we would not like to be Fatchett when he tells some of the locals he is now the proud owner of Buccament Bay. See Ames kinda has not been totally upfront about some of the land that the resort is built on. Fatchett we would get Walton back out there with a surveyor quick and start packing some body armour.
Also it might be worth filling in the water feature around the restaraunts. Those restaraunts that Ames owns that is.
Just got a call advising me about several posts that I am mentioned in.
To clarify a few points:
1. I have been on holiday for 3 weeks, one week in Buccament Bay,
Miami, then other locations in Florida – and still am
3. I paid for all my flights and Buccament Bay myself via Harlequin Travel
4. I have been with my wife
5. I have not met Richard Ingham or David Campion or Gareth during this
trip ( or ever in a combined meeting)
6. I have never been in a meeting with Dave Campion
7. I have only ever met Richard once, at a HP meeting in Warrington
8. I did meet Dave and Matt Ames at Buccament Bay
9. I have written a report for RL they will be sending it to Dave Ames
for comment, this is what was agreed and will happen.
I hope this clears up some of the nonsense of late.
Hi Paul, now now You have been telling a few little porkie pies. By the way who is Kevin Best?
Hi Paul, don’t rise to the troll. He knows nothin.
He knew who you were
Who knew who who was?
I give up Bobby. You, you idiot!
Hi, Bob ours is a quarter pounder with cheese and mushrooms. And large fries and a coke to go.
On second thoughts take your tooth brush and clean the grease trap.
Where is your buddy the window licking imbecilic moron this evening. TS (Tough Shite). He is missing all the excitement.
How’s France? We are all so excited about Monday. Given you did not mention it we just wanted to remind you. And oh yeah Jeremy Newman is a fraudster. We forgot what this is all about.
No Anon, he doesn’t know me. He has some files from his ex employee, WK. he has now run out of information so he posts speculative posts fishing for information. He hoped to drive me off here, but has failed. I could explain what information he has posted which is inaccurate and false, but as they say”give a man enough rope..”
Leave Bob alone. TS is not around to guide him. You cheeky little Amateur Tax evader you. A little baby fraudster. No wonder you have Newman on the brain. Its a jealousy thing.
@Ralph, no one cares about Newman anymore, he’s history, and so are you by association.
Ah bless Ralph, same old same old. Why would I be jealous of some one who was going to lose their house.
There you go again Bob making oblique references to the authorities. What’s that you were saying about rope lol. Email us Bob go on. We might even send you some info back that might remind you of who you are.
Hallelujah at last you acknowledge we are not Mr. Newman. At least that’s out of the way now.
@Ralphy boy, you don’t have my e mail? Tut tut it’s in the file.
Ralph, you now look a total wank pot – really you should know to check facts before making an even bigger fool of yourself.
Ralph, obviously far too subtle for you Jeremy.
Funny how you and Mr. Newman have one thing in common you both are on the verge of loosing everything.
Well that’s not really true now is it. Its you that is staring into the abyss.
I don’t think Mr. Newman will need to resort to burger flipping and grease trap cleaning.
Girls, girls, please put your handbags down and concentrate on what is important!
Not a clue Ralph, not a clue. Can you not find anything else in the file you lifted? Cheap jibes now about burgers. Equaliser has it spot on.
TS / The Equaliser good evening sir, now what facts would they be? Care to elaborate?
Oh yeah Bob found the email address robert-storey@ xxxxxxxxxxxx.com
I have to admit I am being a bit naughty, winding this joker up is so easy.
If you think that is correct then send me an e mail, with your real contact details on. There again of course e mails are traceable just like blocked telephone calls.
Sorry Bob the btconnect email.
Lol you absolute joker.
Your robert-storey@btconnect.com email address. Let us think about that for a minute, ………………..ahh no Bob. We shall remain anonymous for a while longer.
Not working Ralph, keep trying. Must try harder.
That’s right Bob, you are really socking it to Ralph tonight. You’ve been quiet for a night or two but you’ve come back strongly. Really clever and incisive comments. I’m glad someone on here is upping their game. So what do you think about the rescue plan? Are you still confident that Ames will turn things around?
Ralph please, you are making yourself look like a schizophrenic, one minute talking to us sensibly so that we respect and admire your input and commitment to assisting investors, next behaving like a fool with a personal vendetta against someone who really is not that important. Why not just concentrate on the game in hand, are you really that easily distracted by a nobody?
@Stop it girls, you are right. Why is Ralphy Newman worried about a “nobody”? Because his ego just gets the better of him. So sad.
@Anon 9.34 I just don’t know enough about any rescue plan to make a comment. Sorry.
Google this if you want to see my visual image of Bobby
Gilbert Gottfried read Fifty Shades of Grey on Youtube
Dear Mr. Walton, you have stated that you met with an individual once, now we know that is not the case. We would also like to know what Mr. Ghents relationship is with you.
We have documents which prove you are an integral part of this rescue package / take over. We know that the person you claimed only to have met once was also considering his position with respect to his position on the rescue plan.
Given that you claim you only met this individual once, are you trying to imply that you never had any other contact with this individual? Because as you know this is not the case.
Now Garreth Fatchett stated on his website a few days ago that he had someone visit Buccament Bay recently and would publish a report of this persons findings on his return.
Many purchasers believed that was to have been an independent unbiased report on Buccament Bay. We say that Fatchett once again has deliberately miss led his purchasers and his clients.
Mr. Walton have you engaged the services of an independent surveyor. Or have you taken the word of Dave Ames and Matt Ames.
How many of the guests at Buccament Bay were guests and how many were purchasers getting their free week.
You were there for the third anniversary of the opening of Buccament Bay. We have now obtained a copy of the guest count for that week, it will be interesting to see if that guest count concurs with the figures provided in your report. Or does this even form part of your report?
As you yourself have stated you are going to hand your report to Fatchett who is going to get Ames to have a look at it. It will be then published.
You are fully aware that only paying clients of Garreth Fatchett will benefit from this. Are you a paying client. Is Ghent, is the guy you met once?
So Mr. Walton what do you have to say to all the purchasers who were clinging onto the hope that there was to be a rescue plan to save everyone?
More to follow.
Ralph “or ever in a combined meeting” really leads to a lot
of what does that mean exactly. Point #5
Dear all we do take the odd break from time to time away from the hugely important issues pertaining to Harlequin.
It is during these moments where we engage in seemingly meaningless debate with a number of die hard Harlequin nutters out there.
From time to time these nutters do provide us with little nuggets of information and this all helps us to unravel the diabolocal shambles that is Harlequin.
.
I met Sean Ghent once at Birmingham, I met Richard Ingham once in Warrington.
I have spoken to them both previously, however not recently; you should know that?
RL already have the report and photographs.
I am still on holiday so why don’t you contact Gareth Fatchett for further information?
@Ralph
Seem you got this conspiracy all wrong?
lets see what the report says, if we ever get a look….providing the report is honest and not sanitized by Ames its a good thing – is it not?
We get Sweet F**** all out of BB in the past several years only horse shit so lets wait until we see it?
I don’t get this “Fatchett is only representing his clients not all the Harlequin investors” point.
That’s his job. If he was doing anything else, he would not be working in the interests of his clients.
Providing the report is accurate and not some bloody freebie is a good thing.
If its like the so called ‘B list’ spots celebrity endorsements – its just a bribe for saying nice things…..
Bet that rugby ‘star’ gave it glowing reports, free week and no doubt got paid……
Time will tell. Until then we wait & hope.
Dear Mr. Walton, we have evidence which demonstrates that you were fully engaged in obtaining purchasers details for Mr. Fatchett in order to join a rescue plan.
You can contact us on our private email if you wish. You were wholly engaged in attempts to oust the Ames family along with Fatchett and Ghent.
We have a specific interest in Ghent given the evidence we have which demonstrates he was prepared to employ much the same tactics to oust the Ames family as he did in getting Matthew Chapman to resign from the BBC.
The evidence clearly demonstrates that you were fully involved in this plan. In fact Mr. Ghent also discussed in some detail a report he was making to the authorities with you.
We also have evidence where you approached a number of Harlequin agents on behalf of Fatchett in order to get them to provide Fatchett with a list of their clients. Do you understand the data protection act.
Will Fatchett confirm that any agents or IFA’s who handed over client details will not be sued by him now?
We understand your absolute revulsion of the Ames family but Mr. Fatchett had no dog in this fight and we suspect he might have over stepped the Mark. Its fine for purchasers to seek Fatchett out, but to obtain lists of purchasers from agents, well that is overstepping the mark. And there is evidence to suggest this has happened.
See Mr. Walton we believe that Mr. Fatchett’s plan may involve fraudulent preference. There are 1000’s of purchasers out there who will loose everything. Your a purchaser you know how it feels. The Ames’s are a despicable dysfunctional family reviled now by most if not all. The Ames’s and their band of hard supporters will lie about everything anywhere.
Enough lives have been ruined. Its time to stop the rot. Instead its becoming a free for all and those who can ill afford it will loose the most.
We know of many cases of hardship. We know of many cases where people obtained mortgages against their primary properties (their homes) after the mortgage broker helped the applicant falsify the paper work. A big player in this business was progress mortgages in Essex now surprisingly gone. Ames would recommend progress mortgages to clients. Now given that the interest payments have stopped people are about to loose their homes. The banks are also calling in loans early when they discover the information provided by the customer to the bank wwas false.
Fstchett gave hope to these people a false hope.
St Georges Dragon. We have persuasive evidence that suggests that Fatchett and Co were cherry picking high net worth individuals. We fully agree with you on the issue that Fatchett’s loyalties are to his clients. They were many in the HIG who were not his clients yet many purchasers receive updates which include statements such as ” We need the agreement of 70% of purchasers for a rescue plan to work” etc etc etc. This we object to. Until earlier tonight Fatchett never made mention of preferential treatment in any rescue plan for his clients.
We know of some purchasers who were taking their own action but ceased believing there was a workable rescue plan in the offing.
Yes many of the purchasers were extremely nieve greedy even but this nievety was played upon by Ames and his agents who made over 200 million.
If Fatchett intends to buy certain assets from Harlequin fine. But do it within the law. Pay the current market value and allow purchasers not in Fatchetts group chase down the money paid for the resorts. Dont let Ames have it.
Dont complain when the methods used by one side to recover funds is challenged. Too many people have pussy footed around for too long.
what if ralph was ames lackey?
just tryin to get you to send email to track down who is causing a problem man? he dun nuffin- be carful …. he ups to no goods
he a bad man mon…. full of mampy…
matt off to prisun
Look all this argument between those in the pay of DA/HP and the victims…lot of people say look at the facts…ok
I think this is a very,very clever scam…why
1: pay a lot of independent FA/etc money top give what is now bad advice…that’s the first hurdle anybody in pursuit will trip over tracing the money trail
2: make it enough to delay the baying pack of hounds…throw em a whole pig, not just a rasher of bacon
3: when they get past that set the scam up so the uk arm was in effect simply a collector of money that posted it on….is they any crime here?
4: put the contracts into an off shore small tin pot company…in fact spread ot around a lot of em…really scatters the pack does this one
5: deliver some meat (BB) so when they do catch ya they will all scrabble over the found goodies further delay you being caught with ya mits in the cash register
6: partner up with a dodgy (again outside of the uk) builder and don’t have any form of paperwork for a multi million construction project….that way nobody knows what should or should have not beedn built (no the agreement [verbal of course] was only for the walls, not the roof…gives flexibility…to both sides no paperwork…but as he is in on it he wlks away with some millions and splits the spare cash with DA, so both happy
7: have a show trial (after all a couple of million in legal fees …it not their money)…further delays the pack and you may even have a few peeps who believe it was the builders fault….after all they on rogue traders every week..yeah its the builders fault
8: when the pack almost have a hand on you, bring one of the bigger hounds (fatchit ) on board …that takes a big pack of hounds out and misleads most of the others into thinking there is a light at the end of the tunnel
9: pay some daft old boys a few quid to deflect shit on forums (you see it all buys time) (they will never work out they are being stuffed a second time [take bobby bell end this could be you]
very clever..spread the scam across the globe, across many people and buy whoever gets close to you…after all you have a lot of spare cash to throw at the pack
what next….if there is any justice DA will walk around with a stick and need on-going medication for his injuries….whilst in prison (I wish nobody any harm, but about ten years ago in Birmingham I only needed to make a phone call and for £20 it was one leg, £30 and that’s two gone…or £50 for a box excluding flowers…am sure if you know who this is still available (not a route I would ever endorse….but only takes one investor feeling low and instead of putting their last £20 on a horse if you follow)
I stress this was many years ago and not people I did know personally and wanted to associate with…but desperate people do do very silly things
Matt will end up inside…should have listened to daddy, didn’t quite get the off shore part right did he
so peeps you have been scammed by a very clever con man…but take heart life does usually find a way of levelling things out (with or without masonic intervention)
ps masons do help each other…just no dis honest masons so don’t worry bout any masonic help they will be on him heavy honour etc
@ Relax you’re on holiday
Even though you try (rather in effectively in my opinion) to distance yourself it, your post does promote violence against the person. I find that rather sickening.
Whatever someone has done in a civilised country, there is a rule of law to ensure that justice is done. I would not hold back and say that some people need to the full weight of the law to fall on them for their part in this misery inducing fiasco. I sincerely hope that any liquidation deal doesn’t allow some individuals to walk away without the law catching up with them.
Punitive fines; yes. Custodial sentences; yes. Violence; never
All,
I was asked to look at the postings on here by a number of our clients. Just to be very clear :-
1. We act for our clients, no one else.
2. We owe no duty of care to non-clients. Never have, never will.
3. Our sole focus is on providing our clients with the best possible opportunity of meeting their objectives. Nothing more, nothing less.
If we had to wait to get the approval of our non-clients, then we would have a committee of 6000 people. That is nonsensical.
We have used other law firms / company agents / accountants for advice on this matter. It is multi jurisdictional and requires that attention.
We took the view (jointly with HIG) that seeking to find a solution was a better way for now. That remains our position and will continue to be.
The moment we feel we are getting nowhere or our efforts are being frustrated we will act differently.
The postings on here are not based in fact more often than not. They are guesses to seek to illicit responses. The responses are more often than not wrong.
Very simply, apart from those posters who make it obvious who they are supporting, the rest is nonsense. I suspect this site attracts 10 hard core posters, no more.
Whether our clients agree terms which secures them assets or rights is nothing to do with an anonymous message board used by anonymous people. We have to answer to our clients, the SRA etc. No one else. As for the idea, that we owe a duty to people who may feel more “hopeful” because we have engaged with HIG and Harlequin, that is laughable. Either people want us to represent them or not.
I am happy to engage in sensible discussion with anyone. You have my contact details.
1, Hagley Court South
The Waterfront
DY5 1XE
@risk_warning
01384 889900
My colleague Phil Haslam will be more than happy to assist.
Gareth Fatchett
PS – If FDNRM wants to visit again then he needs to take note of our new address.
@Gareth Fatchett, Dont worry I have your new address.
Proved my point , now are you changing to fatchett as sure as fuck does represent me …….
@RH what gave you that idea? What proved your point? What was your point? Do you have a point?
Morning Bob
Thank you Mr. Fatchett for clarifying matters for us. Could you or Mr. Walton clarify one last point for us? What is the Harlequin Investor Group? Are they a part of your Rescue / Takeover plans? Is the Harlequin investor group solely comprised of Mr Paul Walton, Mr Richard Ingham, Mr. Sean Ghent and Mr.Garret Fatchett?
Come on “Garett” Ralph has demanded answers. You must respond ASAP. And be damn quick about it!
@ Ralph, given you are ‘in the know’ surely you would have been able to check the guest list before you made such allegations of Walton & Ingham being at BB having a cosy little freebie?
You also could confirm if Walton is Bullshiting you about not being at BB with his bum chum 🙂 and being with his Mrs?
Sort of makes you look a bit of a numpty?
Could this all be an elaborate ruse to try and discredit Mr Fatchips?
Morning Bob, that would depend where you are reporting from?
Could it be maybe the Carreabean 🙂
Alas as previously stated we only have the guest count. The numbers as per each unit. We are hoping to get our hands on the guest list and await that information.
En Francais mon ami, ou mon amie?
and that number would be?
We were going to wait for Mr. Waltons guest count but we have been reminded that we gave the figure last week. 62 guests in 24 units. Under 25% occupancy. Total staff employed > 100.
@ Ralph, you have somewhat lost credibility, you were doing well, next time please check your facts.
Here is a good one, where did Mr Fatchips and Simon ‘I love Dave’ Terry
go on holiday – the same weeks, the same location.
Yep Portugal.
Maybe some man love going on who knows!
Try doubling that figure for staff if you include contractors eg gardening.
We have also taken a large number of photos of the site in the last week. All though we have not had the same access as was afforded to Mr. Walton by his hosts David and Matthew Ames.
We will however wait for Mr. Walton’s report before posting our photographs.
Bro you are entitled to question the accuracy of our information, we are very happy with our figures and the accuracy of the figures we have provided.
What about Portugal man love ! a little bit odd?
Fatchett is a bit AC/DC and Simon Terry is definitely bent but not in a sexual way.
What a riveting Vacation probably booked through Harlequin Travel. Same place Walton claims to have booked his 3 week holiday.
Which we find rather odd. Walton attacks Ames every which way in the documents we have calling him amongst other things a fraudster and then goes and books a Holiday through Harlequin Travel, Carol Ames’s company we presume.
OMG! RALPH!
The penny has just dropped, what your up to and who has been giving you the info -‘The Fatty Broughton’.
Never heard a peep, now this……….. At least you can write better than a 10 year old.
She has a ‘beef’ with Walton as he proved she was obsessed with the ‘PI’ Ingram, she hates Fatchet because she was never going to be part of HIG, Ingham because he was rude to her, Ghent – well he worked for Ames – so he must be bad!
Just be careful she is unstable and is dangerous woman………
She will have copies and recordings of anything she has gave you and will show it to anyone who gives her some attention.
yawn here you go again…
It will be OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOw when Fatty Matty get it up the wrong un in prison 😉
Ralph,
There is no ‘claiming’ I booked a Holiday with Harlequin – I did and paid for it for several reasons:
1. How can I report on something I have not experienced for myself?
2. The prices for all the flights were competitive
3. I paid by my debit card, so when all the ‘it was a free holiday’ comments
start, I can if i fell like it, prove its not the case.
I will now return to my holiday,
Regards,
Paul
Interesting theory but as Bob has stated we get our information from a card board box or three in the vaults of Wilkins Kennedy.
Maybe we are / is Sean Ghent ? Maybe we are / is The Fatty Broughton ? We have been accused recently of suffering from schizophrenia. TS does state that we have a 40 inch waistline. So we could be called Fatty.
And some say we have lost our credibility so we could be Harlequin.
OMG this is not about Ameless.
This is about Fatty Broughtons infatuation with Mr. Walton, Fatshit was jealous so sent the PI Ingram to spy on Fatty Broughton. That’s when PI Ingram saw Mr. Newman’s German Eagle eating the bacon butty on Fatty Broughton’s new bird table and uncovered the sordid relationship between Fatty Broughton and Newman with his 40 inch waist.
When Fatty Broughton found out about PI Ingram spotting the German Eagle on the Bird Table eating the Bacon Butty she ran up the 39 steps to her boudoir and threw Newman out. See Newman gave his German Eagle, Fatty Briughton”s bacon butty.
Fatty Broughton was the one who put up Newman’s photo in the Brothel up on the Internet. The one TS found on his favourite paedophile site. She was cute enough to block out Simon Terry’s face from the photo though cause she still wants her money back.
Newman and Terry were good friends. Newman had been planning a massive fraud against Harlequin and needed a bent Lawyer. Terry applied for the job and was the most qualified of all the applicants.
Fatshit employed Ingram on the recommendation of Ghent (The Assasin and a who has a kinky obsession for prosthethic limbs )
After Ingram rumbled the scandal of the German Eagle eating Fatty Broughton’s bacon butty and after Newman was made homeless, Ingram broke into Fatty Broughton’s boudoir and discovered the job application from Simon Terry.
Ingram passed the information to Fatshit.
See we must step back in our story a little here. Fatshit engaged the services of Ingram on the recommendation of Ghent to spy on Fatty Broughton because Fatshit thought that Fatty Broughton was having an affair with Walton. And Fatshit was in love with Walton as was Fatty Broughton.
When Fatshit saw the HD shots of Newman taken by Ingram, it was love at first sight for Fatshit. But Newman spurned Fatshits advances and eventually Fatshit sought revenge. He set up a website called Harlecon and engaged the services of a professional computer Hacker Bob Ladell to make it look like Jeremy Newman had set up the site.
If Fatshit couldn’t have Newman no one could. And Fatshit was going to destroy Newman.
During this time Fatshit wanted a career change and decided to become s hotelier. The idea came to him when he used to go to a fish and chip shop on a Friday night.
Whilst he would wait for his cod and chips he started to strike up a conversation with the village idiot who was employed to peel the potatoes, Bob was his name and boy did he have a storey to tell.
To be continued…….
Ralph, to be fair that was funny 😉
All the characters referred to in this work are real. Any resemblance to decent honest fictitious characters, living or dead is purely coincidental.
No Animals were hurt in this blog with the exception of Bob who cut his finger while peeling a potatoe.
Dear Mr. Walton, thank you for your reply. It seems pretty cut and dry. At least you eventually decided to go see Buccament Bay for yourself.
We know you have done a report and we will see it soon, we have just one last question for you. Given that this was your first visit to Buccament Bay would you suggest other investors visit who like yourself may never have been there before?
We will leave you be after this.
KR
Ralph
@Blunt, re. ‘Sid – man of word, but not action’. What makes you think I’m not taking any action? That’s a very uneducated assumption.
Cracking storey Ralph, chapeau mon ami
Ah yes Ralph, “we will see the report soon” A bit like “we will publish the transcripts soon” or “we will publish our evidence soon” blah blah blah
Bob – and I am positively giddy with anticipation as to what Monday
shall bring…….nothing!
Heh Bob how’s our little Mary this afternoon. Its Fatchetts man who is producing the report. We see Fatchett holds you in the same regard as every one else.
Aside from us. See we think you have some uses unlike everyone else. You can always be our little Mary. By the way your unit is gone. All gone. That little Caribbean dream is just that a dream.
Bon Soir. Ha ha or as you say ho ho ho.
And how come Bob you don’t call us Newman. Got the wrong guy perhaps. You never told us who Joe was? Is Joe going to do something Monday? Why Monday? Its a bank holiday, why not today or Tuesday?
So sad Jezza. ” I don’t know what to say so I will make something up” Monday? Just taking a leaf out of your book, “wait for it” Mary? Is that some sort of a name for someone who stands up to Internet trolls and bullies. Where is my e mail? Of course you know e mails, IP address etc can be traced. Any other revelation you want to post about me.? Do you know which rugby match I’ve been to today? What takeaway I had? Full of shit Jezza.
Little Mary as in you bob is cowboy slang for a kitchen helper.
And Little Mary Sunshine is a chuckwagon helper who radiates
happiness. I’d like to hear about a French scrum.
@ralphy Newman, where is my e mail? Of course your little ploy of putting contact information has only been taken up by Private Dick who was stupid enough to take your bait. Everyone else on here is taking the decent stance and not reacting. Look like you are on your own on that one. Unless you are Private Dick. Well we will soon see on that one.
Dear Mr. Walton, we understand you are on vacation but we would appreciate it very much if you could respond to our last question.
Many thanks for your time on this matter.
KR
Ralph
@ralphy why should he. What’s his holiday got to do with you.
@paul Walton, don’t know if you are bothering to read this but tell Ralphy you will “post answers to his questions in the near future and all will be revealed”
Bob we are not private dick nor or we Mr. Newman and you have no idea who may have contacted us. So go away enjoy your holiday, play with your own little private dick. No one else has played with it in a while. Wait till Tuesday TS will be back then.
Actually stick around if you like, go post photos of stranger’s houses or give us the addresses of dead people’s houses, keep playing with your I phone.
Do what you like. Who cares?
@raphy Newman, ” who cares?” Why you do. I must be a real threat to you. And it’s I pad. You cannot even get that right can you. And guess what you muppet I did not post a picture of anyone’s house. You need to have an early night. Have you still got any money for your lawyers bills? I think not.
Sorry Mr. Walton the answer to our question would be very much appreciated.
We just want to know given that you are an investor and given that this was your first trip to Buccament Bay would you recommend that investors like yourself who have never been to Buccament Bay go visit. We would like to arrange for a 2nd impartial look at Buccament Bay.
Your response would be greatly appreciated.
KR
Ralph
Ralph – Unfortunately anyone who has read anything on this blog
cannot give an “impartial look”. Besides “clandestine” just might
be more fruitful..
@Anon, how is it your posting follow Ralph as sure as night follows day. Ralph’s alto ego by any chance?
” robert-storey@btconnect.com sent from my I Phone.” maybe I Pad’s come up as I Phone when an email is sent. We don’t know. Maybe some one out there can tell us?
We have plenty of cash Robert. Thank you. Now you have already lost your villa at Buccament Bay. Please consider that we will make our identities known soon enough and maybe just maybe those you have attacked in a very public way might just consider taking legal action against you and you could loose everything as a result of your actions. So we suggest you put on the kettle and make yourself and your wife a cup of tea and explain to her the possible consequences of your actions.
We doubt some how that you will get much sympathy from most people should you loose everything.
But its up to you Bob. We don’t give a damn what you do. We really don’t.
Alternate might have been a better choice of words to use anon.
Although Clandestine is possibly appropriate.
@ Ralphy I have not lost anything at all. Take legal action against me? What rubbish you talk. Oh I know the usual threats to try and intimidate me. If you don’t give a damn why do you keep trying to attack me. Answer that Ralph, we would appreciate your answer,
Ralph – With Pere et fil on-site it just might be easier.
I tried posting the following 24 hours ago but it obviously got caught up in the auto modder – here it is again minus the two words that I think tripped it up.
A quick peek into the cesspit to see what has bobbed to the surface while I’ve been away – hard to believe that anyone involved, from the bottom to the top, will emerge from this with any shred of integrity intact.
The jostling to get the snouts in the trough while there is still some swill left is particularly unedifying – lots of the little piggies are going to get trampled though.
Extraordinary irony that the PM of the nation most involved, a self avowed … and …, who is currently very busy with his demands for reparations from the profiteers of slavery is hand in glove with the worst elements of buccaneering capitalism who have inherited the slavers mantle.
That worked – the words removed begin with S and M (no, not what you are thinking) and are the opposite of Capitalist.
Troll free forum – http://www.harlequininvestorgroup.co.uk
Hurray !
@investormatic -there was a troll free forum till you advertised it !!!
Now we know why the other forum shut down!
shall we guess how long it will be Troll free?
oh wait the tucking Trolls are running it…..
The HIG site requires you to provide your personal details etc.
Ralph / WTF / FDNRM will not appear !
You aint even using your real name and come on here advertising “your” forum using someone else forum name and slagging this one off on “your” forum, you are c nts! and we all know it so fu k off and I hope BFP f ck your advert off wankers WTF n Walton,
All,
@dave ames has robbed me
You are right. Anyone professing to be open, should also be open.
We have put a forum on the HIG site so investors can discuss things without being posted to death by anonymous posters.
The speculation on Friday showed why an open forum is needed. Without it, people simply make things up. That is no use to anyone.
Good morning Ralph,
I was out and about all day, hence my delay in responding.Its only breakfast time here.
I have invested in two unit so I have actually been over twice before just after it opened.
I don’t see that it would help matters if investors went out, the report in my view gives a fair representation of the current state of Buccament Bay.
I have reported both good and not so good.
So are you saying WTF will not be allowed????? we all know he is in your click and we all know how disgusting he is
we all know he is runnning it with walton an all your doing is trying to drum up trade wanker
DAHRM
Of course you can prove this?
Thank you Mr. Walton, you had given the impression that you had not visited the Buccament Bay site previous to this.
Can you explain your relationship with Garret Fatchet Richard Ingham and Sean Ghent all representatives of the HIG.
Mr. Fatchet has stated that HIG is a separate entity from the clients he represents.
Can you confirm that you are both a member of HIG and a client of Garret Fatchet.
Garret Fatchet is asking all purchasers looking to complete with Harlequin to contact them urgently. He may as well come out and ask that all people willing to complete consider giving him the cash instead.
Fatchett seems now concerned about the urgency of matters. These matters have been very urgent since he began looking into Harlequin.
300+ purchasers bought at Buccament Bay in 2006 2007.
The drawing produced by RL on their website includes an apartment block. Mr. Walton did you notice that this building is not complete. It is shown on the RL drawing as being complete.
Mr. Fatchett could you please explain the previous owners of 7 Capital had with Harlequin and the proposal currently on the table concerning your clients and 7 Capital.
What is or has been your relationship with Mr. Walton, Mr. Ingham and Mr. Ghent?
@Ralph
So Fattchett says complete now? but all agencies say proceed with caution?? I smell a rat do you???
@MMC I told you walton was at BB somthing else he had dinner with the AMES crowd and was acting the big I am want ya walton wanker all dresssed up like a dogs dinner sweeting like a pig
Ralph, I have not an intention of discussing the in’s and out’s of any relationships on an open blog, nor will I be answering lots of questions; I answer one then you ask many more – I have done a report, get a copy and decided yourselves.
@Ames has robbed me.
For the record, I have never had dinner with any of the Ames family, but it was pretty hot, so I could have been sweating at Buccament Bay.
You might find out Paul that you are better aquainted to “Ralph” than you think.
Again thank you for your comments Mr. Walton. Mr. Fatchett speaks about transparency. There is nothing transparent about what’s going on here. A deal is being engineered by few to look after the interests of a minority of purchasers. Indeed there is nothing wrong with anyone cutting a deal with anyone for anyone.
We are however very interested in the potential for Fraudulent Preference to occur here.
Mr. Walton given that you have previously been very open in your attempts to garner support amongst investors for Mr. Fatchett and given your previous participation on sites including this one we find your current reticent attitude rather odd.
@Ralph its called GAGGED
All will be revealed sooon and it will only be a few who get anything isnt that right Fatttchett
Ralph,
If you email me from a traceable email address and say who you are I may be a little more receptive.
At the moment you prefer to hide….. why is that?
I am not a member of HIG; I am a client of Gareth’s; as for the others let them answer for themselves.
That’s it
@Dave Ames has robbed me
F**K me; if you are as dumb as you sound, no wonder Ames robbed you like shooting fish in a barrel.
@WTF/MMC Dont fucking start with me or you will fucking regret it wanker
protesting bumchum walton??? wanker
@Ralph,
Please confirm your relationship with Erica Broughton, Steph Broughton and Nikki Crozier – Have you got all this shit from them?
What is your game? Are you legally trained? even an investor?
Why hide Crozier didn’t Fatchitt is out there…. why you such a coward?
Ralph – I have been reading but saying little on here lately but I’m now confused.
What is it that you are inferring is going on between myself / Fatchett/ Walton/ Ghent?
Just ask and I will clear it up, like you said in a previous post, we have proven we can communicate at a decent level.
People are getting carried away here on rumours that have no foundation.
DAHRM
ooooooooh, your so masterful.
@Lord Haw Haw
That’s because Ralph has no idea what’s actually going on, if you actually look at the posts it’s guess work – scatter gun tactics – throw enough shit about eventually some will stick.
Nothing new, same old same old
The sheep on here think it’s gospel.
Shit in on end shit out the other!!!
Dave Ames has Robbed Me – What’s your problem? I have never attacked you on here or done you any harm so what’s with attacking me on here?
Don’t be so stupid, you make a fool of yourself.
Your another one who likes to talk tough but hides behind his computer keyboard – your a moron, stop chatting your shit about me and back it up or go away.
Ralph please answer
@Ralph,
Please confirm your relationship with Erica Broughton, Steph Broughton and Nikki Crozier – Have you got all this shit from them?
What is your game? Are you legally trained? even an investor?
Why hide Crozier didn’t Fatchitt is out there…. why you such a coward?
DAHRM.
Your command of the English language is astounding; I’m truly in awe of your linguistic skills 😉
DAHRM – it’s very odd the abuse you sling at me when I am just an investor like the majority on here.
Why make me anonymous threats? Don’t threaten just do it – you know who I am, where I live where I work – you know where I am all day long.
Make yourself known and be a man – stop threatening and follow it through tough guy!
@ Lord Haw Haw it’s the same relationship we have with Newman, Mac Donald, Wilkins Kennedy, Storey, Harlequin, Taylor, Terry, Fatchett etc.
Some of us have Legal Expertise and Expertise in Law Order and Governance, some of us have Real Estate Expertise, some of us have Financial Expertise, some of us have IT Expertise, some of us have Investigative Expertise. Some of us just hang around and drink coffee.
@ James Cannon We are fully aware as to what we are looking to achieve. Transparency for all being a primary goal. We have and continue to receive much documentary evidence as it pertains to Harlequin. And we are working through the huge amount of information trying to extrapolate the facts.
Not everyone is comfortable with the Fatchett client led rescue plan nor with Harlequin and the Ames family.
WTF in answer to your question. At one stage Fatchett, Walton, Ghent, Broughton and yourself were all spearheading the HIG. Mr. Walton now claims he is not a member and is a client of Fatchett. Ghent is still working for Ames. Fatchett is representing his clients and is opaque as to the involvement or engagement with HIG. Broughton has shut down her blog site and we no longer hear from her.
What happened to the HIG and what is the HIG now and who heads this up. Fatchett still refers to this still. Would you also be prepared to be interviewed by a Journalist.?We can arrange this.
Ha ha, more to the point “Ralph” would you? Seeing as you want to be so open.
Ralph,
With respect your answer is bollocks. You actually know nothing.
Come on something new or remotely interesting – its too easy to make random allegations…. proof give us proof!!!!!
Ralph – your wrong. I have never been a member of HIG, as far as I’m aware neither was Walton or Ghent. Broughton would have loved to have been invited into HIG and was upset when she wasn’t.
I haven’t spoken to Sean Gent for a month or so but when we last spoke he was no longer working for Ames.
So I cannot assist with what HIG is doing, I have no idea as I’m not and never have been involved. I have offered HIG group free construction advice (project managers/ quantity surveyors) within reason, not given by me but Professionals employed by me – incidentally I made Dave Ames the same offer.
As for a journalist, I’m happy to answer any questions but I’m sure my story is no interest to a journalist!
Oh hi Bob, (our number 1 fan) how’s France? We are all getting excited about tomorrow. Are you?
As we told you previously you will know who we are sometime. We fully intend to continue to engage with media organisations given that we do speak with the mainstream media on a regular basis. We are also working on a documentary. And no it’s not the BBC Panorama programme.And yes Bob we will be asking a journalist to have a chat with you too. In fact you will actually form the basis of part of our documentary.
Given your physic powers in identifying anonymous posters on the Internet and attacking them so publicly whilst defending Ames and Harlequin so vehemently.
WTF thank you for that. Were you ever in contact with Mr. Walton or Ms. Broughton on any issues pertaining to HIG.
Given that you had the pleasure of meeting Mr. Ames would you consider him to be a very persuasive individual?
Given that Ms. Broughton was upset not to have been allowed into HIG. Who prevented her. Who runs the HIG.
Have you ever had contact with Fatchett on the issue of HIG or anything pertaining to Harlequin?
Can you quash the rumour that you first met Mr. Ames in Dubai and invested in the business?
Broughton is too stupid and unpredictable to be a member of HIG – remember her tubby hubby publicly threatened Ames…..very mature
@WTF if he is so informed , why does he ask so much?
Ralph – I have met Paul Walton once, I have never met or spoken to Erica Broughton ever. I have chatted to Paul Ealton regarding Harlequin generally but nothing specifically about HIG. Talking to Paul about HIG would be pointless as he isn’t a member.
Dave Ames role is to promote Harlequin and that may be perceived as being persuasive, I have never had an issue with Dave Ames and he has always been straight with me.
As far as I am aware RL asked for volunteers for HIG and they selected a cross section they deemed suitable.
Yes I have spoken to Gareth Fatchett, about Harlequin and discussed my situation with him. I have never asked Gareth to act on my behalf.
I did meet Dave Ames in Dubai.
I did not invest in the business other than the property I purchased at BB
Ralph,
You seem more obsessed by Fatchet, WTF ect. than Ames?
Its a bit weird- if you know so much, why do you ask so so many questions?
Documentary, don’t make me laugh!
Hope you include all the cock ups and nasty comments you have said on here.
That’s just made you look a total plonker
WTF thank you for answering our questions. We know you were under no obligation to do so but it helps us greatly in ascertaining the truth from the fog of war that exists out there. We hope the irreverent and facetious approach we take at times to the issues raised has not bothered you.
It would be good to think that others would be prepared to act in a similar manner when straight sensible questions are asked on this site.
Thanks WTF
KR
Ralph
@TGAOTCO we admit we do approach the situation differently to most. Don’t worry we have Ameless firmly in our cross hairs. And we see no harm in asking questions. WTF and Paul Walton engaged with us did they not?
We are not sure where you think we might have cooked up. Perhaps you could direct us to any of these cock ups?
The documentary will not make many laugh.
But we know who we are and what we are doing, but we are glad to see that we make you laugh.
Typical, ask another question to deflect . 😉
Why are you scared of people knowing who you are?
Why the obsession with FDNRM WTF Walton, Fatchet?
You keep getting your facts wrong!
What do you hope to achieve?
Give me proof of the documentary, not BS
Answer the questions, its getting boring now.
TGAOTC you stated we cocked up. We stated we did not and we asked you to direct us to where we did cock up.
We are not scared of anything. We choose for the time being to remain anonymous as you yourself have chosen to do.
WTF and Mr. Walton answered our questions, we felt it was necessary to ask them questions given the rumours circulating at time.
FDNRM Bob is just someone / thing that adds little value to what our interests are with one exception he / it does however allude to his / it’s closeness to the authorities and that is of interest to us.
We are very interested in Fatchett as we are in Ames. Both gentlemen do not have the interests of the majority of purchasers at heart. We will do our utmost to ensure what ever deal Fatchett tries to arrange for his clients is done in a legal and proper fashion.
This will give his non clients a fighting chance in seeking redress.
You state we keep getting things wrong. We say we don’t. To infer that we keep getting things wrong would infer that you are in possession of facts or hard evidence to rebut what we have said.
If you are maybe you would like to share this with everyone else.
We have asked WTF and Mr. Walton questions. They have answered them. We have not stated that we believe them nor have we stated that we don’t.
Of course we will give you proof of the documentary when it is completed. We will upload it onto You tube. We hope this will be proof enough for you.
Sorry you find this boring. We will take as much time as we need and will not be pressurised into acting hastily.
Proof of the documentary? Just like proof of the court transcripts you were going to post. Your just full of BS and this will be shown soon.
@ Ralph
A few points, that you cocked up on, my partner is cooking Sunday dinner. he is a cheeky little chap.
1. Reported the Ingram and Walton meeting – wrong
2. Walton never been to St Vincents before – wrong
3. HIG menbers -wrong
4. Fatchet and a deal with Ames – wrong
5. Ghent still working for Ames – wrong
6. Broughton never was or ever will be a member of HIG – wrong
7. Your relationship with Newman, Mac Donald, Wilkins Kennedy, Storey, Harlequin, Taylor, Terry, Fatchett etc. You don’t have one! – wrong
8. Fraudulent Preference to occur here, what is this crap?
9. Fatcheeks asking for cash – wrong
10. About Mr Fatcheeks being AC/DC me my like the music, but he has never made a pass at me! I can live in hope
11. Fatcheeks buying BB, very silly & -wrong
12. Matt going to prison – correct!
😉
So, no wonder he is Leakey – he’s is a fudge packer – gotcha!
Hey Ralph, where is my e mail. Don’t pretend you have not sent me one before.
Bro
1. Both Ingram and Walton confirmed on this site that they met.
2. We never stated that Walton had never been to St. Vincent before. We asked him and he said he was, twice. Mr. Walton alluded to the fact that he had only been there once.
3. We have evidence which suggests the opposite that is why we asked Mr. Walton and Mr. Ingham the question.
4. Ames did a deal with Fatchett with respect to the Hartland group. He was seeking a freezing order on the Caribbean assets on behalf of the Hartland group. Ames offered the Hartland group proceeds from the sale of Dubai properties in exchange for Fatchett not proceeding with the action. Fatchett agreed but the Hartland group never got paid.
5. Well if there is evidence to show that the evidence we have is wrong fine. We are very happy with our evidence.
6. We said Broughton was believed to be a member of the HIG group. WTF said she wasn’t not us. We both appear to agree she was. Not sure your argument here.
7. Sorry prove we do. We’re anonymous as you are lol.
8. Fraudulent Preference go Google it. Lol
9. We did not realise that Fatchett was working on a No Win no Fee basis. That’s great so every purchaser can become his client so. Our work appears to be done.
10. We will take your word for it. We still reckon he is a raving queen.
11. Please explain how else a rescue package can be mounted given the debt burden and the fact that Fatchett is only representing a tiny minority of purchasers.
12. Lets hope so.
So sorry no cock ups here.
Bob your absolutely correct. We told you all ready. Go check your inbox it must be there. We are not arguing with you here. We both concur that we sent you an email. Lol
No Ralph, no e mail. Tell tou what send it again. Recently or back in ……?
Bro we had hoped there was only one stupid thick idiot on here. Heh Bob. We might have been wrong. We admit we have cocked up on this matter.
We hope you just need a trip to spec savers . We hope you don’t look as stupid as you are. Lol
Bob cheers for the read receipt (confirmation).
If fatchett is working no win no fee why have I had to pay him . Most of us have given him fees
List of people who are masons.
Ames
Fatchett
Walton
Ghent
James Baker
Anthony Davidson – Shipleys
Work it out for yourselves.
Ralph, slowly slowly catchy monkey. The net is tightening. You have made 3 mistakes so far. Won’t be long now.
Ralph,
The deal is done. You are too late.
The masonic links were established ages ago. You are not on the level and therefore you are not involved.
FDNRM
Who do you think this Ralph character is ?
We think it is Matt Ames. His last hurrah before prison.
His missus will be very lonely….
Folks its all over for us. Bob the sleuth has us. Jeez he tricked us into sending him an email. And he has given Simple Terry our IP address, Gosh. Were off to destroy hard drives etc. Where is Bob Ladell when you need him?
Bob fatshit will give you a freebie, oh yeah he is doing a no win no fee basis. Wonder what Ames will give you.
Where do you want us to hand ourselves in Bob. ?
@tracing board, all in good time.
Too late mon amie
Bob you have already told everyone who we are? We are Newman. Are we not? Jeez Bob are we not Newman are we someone else? Now who could we be? Go on Bob give us a little hint.This is really getting exciting we are not Newman. Wow.
Ok gotcha Bob. We are not Newman unless Newman is a cross dresser. We are now a female. Are we close Bob. See we saw Mon Amie. The feminine. If we was Newman you would have said Mon Ami. ” Cleaver” very “cleaver” Bob.
Having read Bob for over half a year now, his grammar sucks,
even in his native tongue unless he is Garifuna or Rasta and Ames
promised him a cabana for land. Highly doubtful though that
a G/R would go to France for holiday.
Dear Mr. Fachett we do hope you are enjoying your bank holiday weekend. We are glad to see that you are not taking our facetious take on events too seriously. Thank you for the mention you gave us on your twitter account this evening. Muchas Gracias .
Now what is the role 7 capital is taking in your rescue plan?
Under your section “Restructure” you seem concerned about the 50 people ready to complete at Buccament Bay. You are asking anyone who thinks they might have purchased a unit on the area high lighted on the map to come forward.
We have a document you might find most interesting. As you said time is short, “Tick Tock”. A phrase used by Bob. Now you have been telling a few porkies haven’t you?????
“You stated in an email earlier to clients et al that the Barbados Free Press is neither reliable nor useful so you set up your on little blog site.
We find BFP to be excellent. See you had no problem with it either in the past when you were fishing for high net worth clients.
But you have made a few clangers haven’t you. Oh yes you have. But heh your clients are none the wiser, yet. You refer to us as giving your clients a light hearted moment. ” Madness ” ” Ralph”
What has you so worried our friend. Is it the madness that is spooking you. Why are we and BFP worthy of mention by you.
See you have been playing God with purchasers. And that was naughty.
Mr. Walton gave you a report. We suppose the first question is what qualifications does an importer of Chinese Wall Paper, have to make such a report?
Oh yes we have digressed the document you so crave. Yes. We will give it to you. No problemo. If you need it just ask. You have our email.
We will give it to you no strings attached. None. Its yours.
@Ralph, we have all the intel on your little group, I was taught to be cautious
We are glad to see that our plan to assist all purchasers and not just the chosen few has been rumbled.
I suppose the first question Walton would ask is what qualifications do you have….. tick tock
Can you put Bob out of his misery and confirm to him we are not Newman. You have the Intel. Fair cop so.
All right folks. It seems that all purchasers are happy to let GF save the day. Best of luck folks. We are raising the white flag.
Ralph,
Send us the document then.
You know what we are interested in.
gareth.fatchett@regulatorylegal.co.uk
So mote it be Ralph – you think you little club knows things?
http://citywire.co.uk/new-model-adviser/is-gareth-fatchett-biting-the-hand-that-feeds-him/a401896
Anonymous, you point is what, you can post a link?
The point is that the man swings both ways……..
Mr. Fatchett we have one simple request in return. Just one. You have stated that RL represents the HIG. If so how many members are in the HIG. If you don’t then please just state it. Unequivocally. There are purchasers out there who unwittingly believe that as a result of they being “members” of the HIG that you and RL will provide a rescue plan and save the day.
Please we ask you to give an unequivocal and final answer on the issue. Is HIG or any member of HIG who is not a client of RL or your good self going to benefit from your planned rescue bid.?
@ A word, now why would Mr. Walton want to know our qualifications for? We did not write the report.
It’s funny there are those on this site who state things along the lines of ” you little club thinks they know things”
What we know we will tell everyone. If others know more feel free to share it.
N’est pas?
Where’s this stuff come from about Gareth Fatchett being half chips half rice come from? And what relevance has this with the Harlequin situation?
@Ralph, I know exactly who you are.
Ok Bob. We know you know. We are Newman are we not?
Ralph,
Like most law firms we run both a claimant and a defendant practice. So I suppose we do swing both ways. Then again, so do many others !
HIG – 6 investors, none of which are any of the people named here.
Yes, they would benefit. After all, they are our clients.
A wider rescue will emerge, but it needs someone to organise the majority of the investors. That has not happened as most investors believe the agent nonsense that it is all going to be fine.
It is slowly dawning on many, that this is not the truth. Bit by bit, those who have realised is increasing.
The sad fact is that until people realise, they dream that all will be well (in the end).
We do not have time to find the remaining investors. Nor are we going to dedicate significant resource to that task. If investors want help, they can ask.
The key to this is and always will be the realisation at Harlequin that they cannot move forward without dealing with their creditors. Remember, most investors are not creditors as they have not taken any steps to ask for their money back.
Therefore, the population who have asked for a refund is smaller. I suspect you will find we represent the majority in that category.
Ralph – why not help us to build a wider group ?
FDNRM – why argue with Ralph ? You have not received your last rental (we understand). If so, you are in the same position as every other investor.
I will like to see you debating the issues in your true identities. Then we can take you seriously.
Lets all gather around and join Gareth Fatttchett and sing Kumbaya
as he is not doing this for his own gain is he???? wanker
A question to any legal-eagles out there. Can a takeover plan
of BB move forward without resolution of the SVG court decision
re: the five American investors? Several months ago I was reading
that Ames was refusing to pay.
@GF, I was beginning to like what you are trying to do, almost bonding with you. Then you post a “Ralphish” type statement. You don’t know and I am not going to tell you regarding rent. I know who Ralph is, or are, but cannot confirm on here today because of the bank holiday En Englais.
FDNRM – Grammar dear boy, grammar…..Angleterre
@Anon, couldn’t spell it, but you got my drift.
@Ralph
When you speak next to The super morbidly obese one, please as how the relationship with the Irish builder is like now?
Especially as he is a con man, who has been stealing investors money – does she STILL call him 😉
If you answer the following questions, you will find who is behind Ralph…..they will be posted shortly.
Yes, the judgments would be void against a Caribbean insolvency.
The issue then falls to the value of the investments. Remember SIPP’s have valued at £1 each.
Makes the valuation easy to work with.
2000 x £1
plus the cost of running a loss making resort.
That is going to be peanuts. It is actually a liability.
The accountancy valuation which RL already has is minimal.
Therefore, the RL vehicle which is going to buy the assets and take on the running of the resort will not need much to fund it.
Remember they will buy for £1 per investor on day 1 and then flip it to the real buyer (Ames / Seven) shortly thereafter. RL clients all get paid in full (as that will be the consideration for the deal.
Nothing preferential about that as the FCA (the UK regulator) has already forced the valuation issue.
@FDNRM
Can you see your unit on the plan at http://www.harlequininvestorgroup.co.uk ?
I suspect you and a few others will claim it.
Were you aware that Tailormade own 12 Cabanas instead of receiving commission ?
Garreth as promised here is a little information you might be interested in. Old numbers versus new numbers, we might consider working with you. A total of 492 units were sold at Buccament Bay as of the 30th April 2008. You will note that the apartment blocks 4,5 and 6 and the units sold there in, were sold on Land not then owned by Harlequin or by the Ames Family and to date not owned by Harlequin or the Ames family.
We thank you for clarifying the position regarding the HIG Group and its 6 members.
https://anonfiles.com/file/68fdefd0ba90a499e75b589bdeb983e7
https://anonfiles.com/file/ea9c565cb76a96d7127e39f8791b9449
https://anonfiles.com/file/40ef321bad01cf5b854f4e49296918dd
https://anonfiles.com/file/f336086a069e165cc9b21c3070034d61
https://anonfiles.com/file/5ba84d548b3873bfd9c8515a89fb85a4
https://anonfiles.com/file/14757c1571241f280ad585346ddd35f7
Garreth please find some interesting info
https://anonfiles.com/file/68fdefd0ba90a499e75b589bdeb983e7
https://anonfiles.com/file/ea9c565cb76a96d7127e39f8791b9449
https://anonfiles.com/file/40ef321bad01cf5b854f4e49296918dd
https://anonfiles.com/file/f336086a069e165cc9b21c3070034d61
https://anonfiles.com/file/5ba84d548b3873bfd9c8515a89fb85a4
https://anonfiles.com/file/14757c1571241f280ad585346ddd35f7
Garreth here we go
https://anonfiles.com/file/68fdefd0ba90a499e75b589bdeb983e7
https://anonfiles.com/file/ea9c565cb76a96d7127e39f8791b9449
https://anonfiles.com/file/40ef321bad01cf5b854f4e49296918dd
Without legal SVG title, no one really owns a Cabana at BB.
https://anonfiles.com/file/f336086a069e165cc9b21c3070034d61
https://anonfiles.com/file/5ba84d548b3873bfd9c8515a89fb85a4
https://anonfiles.com/file/14757c1571241f280ad585346ddd35f7
Garreth these are the sales logs for the Buccament Bay Resort to the 30th of March 2008, (Two Thousand and Eight) A total of 492 Units sold as per the 30th March 2008.
Note that units were sold in Apartment Block 4,5 & 6. This is on land that was not owned by any Harlequin entity or by the Ames family or any one connected to the Ames family or the group of companies as of the 30th March 2008. This land as you know is still not owned by either Harlequin or the Ames family or indeed anyone connected to them.
Also note the revised unit numbers.
We are considering working with you.
Thank you for the clarification that aside from your direct clients there are only 6 members of the HIG.
We may have a lot of information relevant to Harlequin
Thanks Ralph, you’ve proved you’re full of shit!!
I emailed Ralph days ago and reminded him on here but guess what? He ain’t replied here or there. He’s just another bullshitter on here and I have to agree with the people saying he’s that Newman dick head.
Tommy we will get back to you. Its just your IP address went through a proxy server. As you can see we are in the process of releasing information to assist all purchasers.
Gareth BFP is not really that bad or useless after all.
I could be a bit thick here, I can see my old number but its not the price or deposit amount I paid?
@Dave Ames has robbed me
Please, please, no more.
The figure’s on the sheet are the full sales prices of the units. You may only have paid 30% of this plus 1000 pounds.
Ralph,
Very interesting. Can you email the files to me ?
gareth.fatchett@regulatorylegal.co.uk
Where are the Spa Villas on the map ?
I cannot see them.
Ralph,
HIG has 6 investors who act to steer the group. They have no axe to grind other than to get a fair deal for investors.
We have around 1200 subscribed to the HIG website.
I am not allowed to disclose client numbers, save to say, that we will represent the majority of claiming creditors / unsuitability claims.
If you are genuine, then I am prepared to discuss matters properly with you.
I am sure you will make your hand known at the appropriate juncture. Just make it soon !
Garreth the SPA Villas are to be located at the rear of the resort close to where the full size soccer pitch is located.
If you had the management accounts you could calculate fairly accurately determine how many purchasers had completed by March 2008, never mind 2013.
The information is all out there. We believe however that Ames has been selling you a pup.
UPDATED INFORMATION.
As you are aware the temple of Harli Krishna has been under sustained attack for the last couple of weeks from “Ralph” We have obsorbed the rhetoric and information being put into the ether and now is the time to strike back. Many hours have been spent on the I Pad in the karsie deciphering cryptic clues. But following the lessons learnt from Bletchly Park, “suck them in and let them make the mistakes” So here is the reality of the situation.
WHO HAD THE DETAILS: When interviewed by the SFO I was told “we had your details because when we issued a section 2 onto the accountants all HP client information was on file” Which accountant was that? Who as an accountant could be involved with HP? Ralph stated ” we have all the contracts from 2006-2008 yet quote my Cabanna number as 34. This was not changed to 34 until July 2009. Who would still be involved in July 2009 with HP?
CONTACTS: Jeremy Newman, a tax planner at WK has on his contact page “Pressed to Impress” Who is Pressed to Impress?
TRANSCRIPTS. A few months ago on another blog someone was boasting about having transcripts of the Irish court case but would not publish them due to “copyright” Who could that of been? I know from telephone conversations that only two copies of the transcripts were issued, to DA and to O’Callahan Solicitors in cork. How could a copy of the transcripts got from a solicitor in Cork to an obscure blog written by an embittered investor?
ATTACK: At this time unprecedented attacks were made on GF. Now I’m no fan of GF but who could he upset to such an extent? Only someone who was not part of his circle, someone who thought they could do a better job than him. Someone who thought a rival could do better. Who might that be?
TELEPHONE NUMBER “Ralph” then decided to print more information about me, but made the fatal mistake of printing my mobile telephone number, only it was not my number but a misprint. I remember giving out this incorrect number by mistake, but who did I give it to?
At this stage I decided to give out some mis information, standard practice to make the opposition complacent, and it worked.
PRIVATE DICK decided to get really clever and print my address and home telephone number, I’m not ex directory and 192.com can tell you anything. e.g. Violet MacDonald was still on the electoral roll in 2012. Some one called my home number at 8.27 Aug 22nd and withheld their number. I did not answer the phone with my name. I previously said I was in France, 8.31 PD posted “you are a liar, you are in Nuneaton. PD also kindly posted the number for Nuneaton police station. Call to police (thanks PD) and to BT to report malicious phone call which will be traced. Due to the bank holiday that information will be available tomorrow. Where are you now PD?
E MAIL, so now we are on a roll, “Ralph” has an ego, standard practice for someone who thinks they are top. I tempted “Ralph” with the “why dont you send me an e-mail?” Ralph then posted on 23 Aug 9.17pm robert-storey@btconnect.com SENT FROM MY I PHONE. Messages sent from my I Pad say “sent from my i pad” so I knew it was from an i pone e mail.
Now I rarely send e-mails from my i phone so I checked and I have sent e mails to 4 people. two to HP personnel who I trust, one. to a 3rd party who would not have anything to HP and one to:
From: Robert Storey
Date: 28 June 2013 15:58:34 BST
To: Erica broughton
Subject: Re: Banned
Erica, you have banned me from your forum without even the curticy of an e mail explaining why. Perhaps you will take this opportunity to explain.
Bob Storey
Sent from my I PHone
So there we have it. If anyone wants to sue me or call the police, I’m sure RI knows a copper, then go ahead.
But now we know who “Ralph” is, or are. You dumb pair.
I will have the phone number details for the call of the 22nd August and that will be published on here.
Gareth we fully respect that you are entitled to be reimbursed for your efforts. And that you wish to maintain confidentiality as it pertains to your clients.
What we cannot accept is that the Ames family, senior management, current or who have recently left including their in house legal team benefit in any way from any form of rescue plan or buy out.
I hope you agree with us on this issue.
And she would have gotten away with it too if it wasn’t for you meddling kids!
It really is all very Scooby Doo!!!
@FDNRM, I’ll go out on a limb and say that I don’t personally think Ralph is Erica, or not just Erica and her daughter. I have a feeling that Ralph includes far more people than that, who collectively have a lot of information on the whole situation. I don’t know for a fact but have a pretty strong hunch.
Sid – I’m convinced one of them is in the islands.
@Sid, you are right. Notice the connection between Newman and Erica. I’m sure there are plenty of people in the island ready to spread some dirt, Yatinkiteasy?
@FDNRM
Couple more for you:
1. Who hates WTF and Ames, to the point of obsession?
2. Who hates Ghent because of something allegedly said on the Harlecon
site?
3. Who’s husband threatened to ‘kill Dave Ames?
4. Who likes taking pictures of peoples cars outside their home?
5 Who hates FDNRM & Walton
6. Who has an obsession with PI’s
7. Who is to dumb to be a part of HIG
8. Who was consistently in contact with a certain guilty Irish builder
9. Who gives ‘Ralph’ or should I say ‘The Ralph’s’ disinformation that
actually proves who it is, because it was only told to one person !!
10. Who had a silly little blog with sad little followers, who could write better
than a ten year old, could they be Ralph’s?????
Any help?
More to follow………………..
Absolutely fascinating Inspector Clueless .
So the SFO gave you details of witnesses in their investigations and you made this public. We hope this is not true. For your sake lol because you may just become a bit of a celebrity on that issue.
But it appears you have a slam dunk on this one. Just get the police to liaise with your friends in the SFO.
We have copies of emails as they pertain to the Irish Court transcripts, Mr. Ames through a Mr. Outrum sent the court transcripts to a number of media organisations. And we have the emails.
We are on a Swiss Roll now Lol.
Who did you give the wrong number too Bob? Name them, Shame them lol.
You sent us an email Bob from your I Phone. So it was five emails not four lol. But who cares, you sent two emails to people you trust in Harlequin, lol your one of the few if any who would trust anyone in Harlequin.
Are you suggesting that Mrs MacDonald who passed away two years ago called you on a blocked or withheld number. We look forward with anticipation to this particular revelation tomorrow. Make sure you publish the letter from BT and the Police with the withheld number, just for credibility’s sake.
Maybe Newman called you from a call centre in Bangalore or Mumbai.
Ok so now you need to link all the characters , and it might be good to name them.
Who are Ralph Bob? Who are they?
Currently we have a woman who sadly passed away nearly Two Years Ago. A tax accountant Mr. Newman because the SFO told you. Or did they just say accountants? Lets include Mr. MacDonald and Wilkins Kennedy, just in case.
A woman called Erica Broughton who has a “New Bird Table” by all accounts and has been made out to be mad by some on this blog site. We also have someone who dresses to impress. A firm of solicitors called O Callahan and Private Dick.
Ok this is great Bob.
We count 8 potentially involved, so why call us s “Dumb Pair”.
You have nailed it Bob. Lol Well actually you haven’t. But heh nice try.
Why don’t you go enjoy the Bank Holiday weekend. We all can’t wait for you to reveal ” That Number Tomorrow”
I wonder if there is another forum out there where hardcore members share their information. Membership would be by invitation only and it would be kept a well guarded secret. It could communicate with the outside world under a single shared identity, maybe a man’s name. I wonder.
Yes “Ralph” wind you up and let you go LOL. The game is up. Celebrity? would that be the documentary? Waffle waffle waffle. Unfortunately you played all your cards too quickly and gave too much information away. Nothing left now but trying pointless jibes. Sad old bird and her mate(s)
Yes Its called a Masonic Lodge
@ERJY Well if it isnt true they can sue me. In fact perhaps some one might know an inspector gadget who is used to talking with EB. They could investigate.
There’s only one man that can solve the mystery of ‘who is Ralph’. Step forward P.I. Richard Ingham. Your services are needed once again. The biggest question of all must be ‘does Ralph have a Blue Peter bird table, or doesn’t he?’
The 2nd question is ‘when can we have our money back from Ames?’
@Ralph, you have attacked so many people with you attitude, what comments to you have for the exclusive Nikki Crozier £7000 up front club?
So mote it be
Now that WTF seems to have toned down and found Jesus or
something, FDNRM has picked-up the slack. What pray tell has any
of it got to do with salvaging something from Harlequin. It seems that
the olive branch offered by Fatchett to FDNRM set off a really
negative reaction. A grasp of reality is not his strong suit. Who cares
where Ralphs’ information comes from. Some of it is damn good!
@sid
You have no chance of getting your money back
Unless you are part of the RL deal that is
Good to see someone can have a laugh in the face of all this 🙂 was that Step forward, with your left foot?
Come on PI Ingham, where are you when you are needed?
@ The Square, why don’t I?
Ralph is Dan Dalligan.
Matt Ames is his leader.
@All seeing eye, left foot forward, trouser leg rolled up, wallet full of other people’s cash. You know, the usual way.
Take a short pace with your left foot. Bring the heel of your right foot into the hollow of your left foot in the form of a Ames……….
Sid – money has gone .
Yesterday in an email RL sent to clients and those in HIG. RL stated that the information on BFP was neither reliable nor useful.
We are glad to see that this afternoon RL have had a change of Heart on their statement.
Take a bow BFP. RL have directed their clients and HIG to BFP.
Garreth we acknowledge that Ralph shows signs of madness at times but as they say in madness there is genius.
That’s because there are several of you…………………..
Good question, about Crozier ? please answer.
Pay me now, you mistake our irreverence and satirical style as an attack. We are sure paying £7,000 for Crozier’s services is acceptable by some. We normally cap our expenditure after a night out at £60 and for that we would expect not just a massage but a pedicure, manicure, can of coke and a curry aswell.
Have you an address or number for this exclusive club? Was this where Newman was photographed. Was that Crozier on the pole. ?
At last some blog ran buy professionals not some dangerous woman and crack pot followers, who achieved SFA
Ralph,
We have uploaded your documents on to our Forum.
We are finding quite a few people who cannot find their unit. Also, quite a few who bought Phase 1 and were then moved to Phase 2.
I suspect we will receive many more interesting examples of numbering and selling in the days to come.
@Ralph
What do you think? is she not just going for high net worth people? seems a bit unfair like you said before.
She is only in it for the dollar, like the rest, you may want to investigate her little gifts for referrals.
Crozier on a pole OMG with those implants, at her age Noooooooooooooooooo!
Hi Gareth, in the event that you do uncover units have been sold, re-numbered and then resold in a repeat pattern, is that not plain and simple fraud? In which case, what would happen to Ames and Co?
I don’t think Erica should be attacked too hard. She tried hard before losing control.
Crozier has Ames’s assets frozen. She has his attention.
Fatchett has hundreds of Statutory Demands blocking Ames.
Between the two of them, they have stopped his end game.
Matt Ames is going to prison. The Insolvency Service report tells you all you need to know.
Anyone Harlequin through and through will know that Matt is the blue eye boy. Father’s son etc.
Dan is too weak and Carol too depressed to be effective. Therefore it will be mad Dave on his own after end of September 2013.
Dave is not going to be able to withstand the afters with the media, the lawyers and everyone who has been done wrong by him. They will hunt him down and finish HP off.
It will crash into liquidation. That is when the fun starts. The buyer of the assets will be sheltered behind trusts.
You can speculate until the end of time, but it will never come out. A bit like Ken Bates who never owned Leeds United (honest).
Thanks Ralph, lets say my old unit number was 207( its not) but its on the sheet for say about £135,000
I paid about 80k deposit
it was ‘valued’ about 350k
now the number is in the 1,000’s
Confused old shelf stacker
Sid,
If we had clear evidence, then we would be duty bound.
A few years in the pokey will get rid of all that Caribbean beer belly
Fat Matt has a cracking wife.
She’ll be very lonely.
Particularly when the daily fake tan allowance stops / property is repossessed etc..
She’ll want pastures new. For sure …
@Gareth Fatchett, don’t you think it’s rather odd that “Ralph” not so long ago was castigating your attempts at being involved in anything to do with HP is now trying to be your Bessie mate? Do you believe the documents are genuine? Now that “Ralph has been exposed do you think they are looking for allies? I am not your best supporter but be careful what you wish for.
OK folks Ralph is a group of people. Could it be that Ralph is everyone else unconnected to Ames, Harlequin, Garreth Fatchett and HIG.
We don’t sell Chinese Wall Paper but we could be connected to China. We have no Indian contacts unlike Garreth. We could be considered Island Men / Women.
We are facetious. So let’s indulge the fantasies of FDNRM. Let’s not get side tracked by the Fact that the Ames family are after taking everyone to the cleaners.
No let us keep the focus on who we are. Let Nero Fiddle while Rome burns.
Keep up the good work Bob.
Oh yeah now there are nine of us now Crozier has been included.
@Matt’s MIssus likes a fat one
( up the wrong un)
How long have I got to get fat? Fat all over? Fatty belly?
Ah Ralph’s coven, I could trip you up again with a simple question, in fact two, but lets leave those for a later date. You know how that works don’t you.
@fdnrm @ralph
Remember – a friend of mine etc etc
S&F,
W Bro Walton
@fdnrm
Ames is not on the level with you. Or are you not on the level with him ?
S&F
@Senior Deacon
Do you have anything to give in the cause of charity ?
The site plan on reg legals site – about 100 units built – whats going on that’s a bigger *uck up than we were told – £400 million!!! for a * ucking building site – looks shit, is shit.
Where is the report?
Originally there was to be no phasing of Buccament Bay. The phasing only occurred in 2008. Ames never stated what phase 2 consisted of.
Phasing was only introduced given the very precarious cash flow situation Harlequin found themselves in in 2008.
Project Orange was used to deal with the double triple and quadruple selling of the same unit. The changing of the Cabana numbers was used to mask this.
The apartment numbers did not change however.
The apartments are five floors. Example unit 5112 is apartment block 5 floor 1 unit no. 12.
There are 10 apartments on every floor. So if you have a number 3269 that would be odd. 3 block 3, 2 floor 2, 69 being the unit number.
Bob at least we are providing information. Have you any documents you are willing to share.
I reckon Matt will get 5 years 6 months.
His missus will get trimmed and then rimmed within 12 months.
Adoption by their new “dad”.
Carol will finally flip and attempt to look even more frumpy.
Dan will go back to delivering post. His missus will still me getting the Ames treatment.
Anyway, it’s a mess. A human tragedy.
Knew it. That Walton is a Mason, how far up is he? He just looks the type.
I bet that Fatchips is one, all solicitors are – that fact.
When do we get a copy of Project Orange ?
Fatchips is on the level. No doubt.
He ain’t fat though.
Anonymous – what is the direction of your travel ?
@Ralphs coven, I have shared an e mail from my I phone. Any comment?
Bob you may as well trip us up. Gareth will soon discover the path that leads to the final nail to be battered into the Ames family coffin.
You will have triggered a national scandal given your claims that the authorities give information on witnesses to other witnesses. In this case details of prosecution witnesses to the defendant’s witnesses. These are bizarre claims but given your resolute conviction on this matter it does need to be addressed.
I believe Mr. Fatchett would concur with us that you making some very serious allegations with respect to the authorities.
There is little doubt now that you will face legal action from a number of parties in the future given your obsession with them.
We will continue to assist purchasers in their quest to unravel this financial fraud.
We know our words will fall on deaf ears when it comes to you. We know you are a thick ignorant stupid fool, and we know Ames knows this too, that’s why he and Terry allow you to make the bizarre statements you make with respect to the authorities and others.
@Ralphs coven, give up the scare tactics will you. Only a tax planner would threaten a receiver of benefits with tax evasion. Now you think threats of prosecution witnesses etc etc. wasn’t you who said transcripts are not subject to copyright? You really are out of your depth.
Bob have we any comment to make on the ” email ” you posted?
Yeah we have.
If the email is real then it would appear that Erica Broughton is an excellent judge of character and was totally justified in banning you from the forum. You weirdo. Lol
Ha ha Ralph snappy snappy. A weirdo now? Getting rattled are we? If the e mail is real? E mail me and I will forward it on to you. Can you do that “Ralph”
Ahhh no Bob you fool. The Transcripts come from a trial. Trials in the most part are held in public.
You are telling us all that the authorities have given you information about prosecution witnesses in a criminal investigation ahead of the authorities even making a decision to prosecute.
This raises huge questions as to the maintenance of confidentiality by the authorities as it pertains to witnesses in criminal investigations.
And you are the individual inadvertently perhaps who is exposing this.
If you are lying about this then we would not like to be in your shoes.
Either way you are an absolute fool.
We emailed you already Bob twice. Do we have to again? Really? Ok here goes . This will be the third time.
We know that this might sound like an odd suggestion but given that the documents etc we are uploading come from Harlequin and Harlequin established Project Orange, surely given the Ames’s family’s desire to be open and transparent that they would be happy to explain what project orange was?
Bob is an idiot.
Bob – you really are a simpleton.
You vaingloriously claim to have “unmasked” Ralph by trotting out spurious tittle tattle in which no-one has the slightest interest. What about the suggestion that Ames sold the same apartments to several different people? This appears of no concern to you but you expect others to pay regard to the fact that last week you received a blocked call whilst pretending to be on holiday in France.
You are a sad, deluded old fool and if you had the slightest degree of good sense you would be on the phone to Mr Fatchett begging him to accept you as a client.
And if Fatchett has the slightest degree of good sense he will tell him to bog off
If it is proven that HP sold properties more than once, then this is fraud, plain and simple. As Gareth has confirmed, if he is the one to uncover this he will be duty bound to act at which point legal action will have to be taken. If this does happen then anyone standing by Ames (mentioning no names) will be supporting a proven criminal, and their lack of integrity will be clear to all.
I would be totally amazed if the appropriate UK jurisdictions have
not been glued to BFP for quite a while. If not what a wonderful
laissez-faire system in place to allow fraud to occur in the first place.
Especially with so much advance notice/press/stat demands etc
etc, etc.
Bob,
Why not tell us your unit ?
I wonder who else owns it as well ?
To be able to sell the same thing so many times, take so much more money and still mess it up, is quite an achievement.
@ralph
You know about Orange don’t you !
Do you have any more evidence to post to anon files ? Today’s little snippet wasted a lot of paper printing, but was well worth it.
No wonder Ames wants to fractionalise ownership. He’s done it already for most units. Its nearly timeshare !
What an inglorious end for him to be found to be the best salesman and that be his downfall.
Why have the SFO not looked into this ?
Surely, they can grab the sales ledger ?
Garreth have you taken the time to read the court transcripts being posted on this site. Did you get a chance to cast your beady eye over the transcripts pertaining to Mr. Samuel Commissiong. They might just be worth a read.
And have you considered the law in St. Vincent as it pertains to land rights, ownership etc.
We cannot seem to find our very old St. Vincent land conveyancing law books for the moment but our juniors recall some mention of “Equitable Interest”, is this why the original Buccament Bay contracts as issued by Harlequin had a clause in it that stated that title would pass to purchasers once the deposit had been paid.
Is this not an argument being put forward by Harlequin themselves as it pertains to land they state they have paid deposits for but have not completed on at Buccament Bay? Land on which they have sold units to purchasers.
Garreth have you looked into the background of Willams and Williams.? Are they not closely affiliated with the ruling party and its leader The Hon Ralph Gonsalves * Prime Minister. The same party who through its Chairman Senator Julian Francis, stated in the print media in St. Vincent that Buccament Bay must be protected at all costs.
Julian being the Prime Ministers cousin.
You all ready have many of the answers you seek. You just need to look at it again.
You make a great point Officer
Ralph,
Why not be in contact with Fatchett ? Help him to look ? I am going to call him tomorrow and suggest he meets you.
As a quick question. I am reading the Sales list.
D & M Ames (Dan and Matt) bought their £1.3m Penthouses. Where are these to be found ?
Freebies ?
Did they pay their 30%
@Ralph – I’m high-fiving myself. Whoopee there are boots on the
ground in the islands. Truth is on your side….
@ OO and sid
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) and the essex police ARE looking into this
http://www.sfo.gov.uk/our-work/our-cases/case-progress/harlequin-property.aspx
Garreth you are worried about time. You already have enough in your arsenal to seek and obtain an injunction against Harlequin and a freezing order over the Harlequin assets. You could take this action in the BVI on an exparte basis.
The discovery process in this action would be most interesting.
The time for good faith negotiations with Harlequin has long since passed. Be under no illusion Harlequin have no intentions of entering good faith negotiations with anyone.
And be under absolutely no illusion, Mr. Simon Terry in house solicitor for Harlequin despite being an officer of the court is just as culpable if not more so then Ames.
If you have not read the Irish Court transcripts, then also have a look at the transcripts as they pertain to Carol Ames.
Garreth as you well know, it was Matthew Chapman ( The award winning BBC journalist and producer ) who unearthed the existence of Project Orange.
Ames felt he was becoming too dangerous and with the help of Mr. Sean Ghent destroyed Mr. Chapman’s career in the BBC.
Ok so Mr. Chapman may have used some rather unorthodox methods but Mr. Ghent did infer that he could help and assist Mr. Chapman in uncovering the truth about Harlequin. Mr. Chapman does not have the protection of legal privilege which is the word Harlequin use to mask the true purpose of project Orange.
We refer to Mr. Ghent because in much the same way as he promised to assist Mr. Chapman in uncovering the truth about Harlequin he offered to assist you and the HIG. But he was also assisting Mr. Ames and you are aware of all this.
A lot of time has been wasted as a result of false promises and duff information provided by Harlequin under the guise of partaking in good faith negotiations.
Come on Bon tell us your cabana number then we can see who you ate sharing it with!
You know I know so I will give you 4 choices to prove I know – 5011 to 5014!!!
Ha ha ha! Must be spooky me knowing so much!
It is spooky knowing there is another Ralph out there. Hello Ralph. I think you mean Bob. And it’s no 34.
PS Ralph 5011 to 5014 are apartments not cabanas.
We suppose if Bob or Harlequin or any Harlequin supporters cant beat us, they would like to be us.
@”Ralph” Stop lying and cut and paste the e-mail you claim you sent to me. I can do it, so can you. Lets face it you have not done it have you. Funny how you claimed to have contracts between 2008 and 2008 but my cabana changed number July 2009. Where did you get that information from?
Just a quick question, if someone lifted clients information from, lets say an accountant, and posted it on the internet, is that a breach of the data protection act?
@GF, just a note of caution for you, I know some of the information Ralph has sent to you is incorrect. Why would Ralph, now your bessie mate, be using you to try and bring down DA? Could it be the upcoming trials for WK, Newman and MacDonald? Singing like a stuffed pig comes to mind.,
It may or may not be. Depends on the details. But given we are all anonymous or in your case try to be it really does not matter.
We don’t know what cabana number you are. It was you who told us. There is also more then one Ralph on here.
Bob if you have proof or documentation that differs from what we are providing please share it with everyone.
Bob we really think you have lost your mind. We have stated that Harlequin cant continue with the Ames family involvement. RL have stated the same in some of their news letters.
Sadly Harlequin are trying to find an out of court settlement in the defamation case. By the way Bob when is the case due to commence? We have heard that as a result of delays on the part of Harlequin the case is now not due to next April. Now we know given the urgency which Harlequin want justice to be dispensed if the delay was not on the part of Harlequin, they would have explained this in an update.
Bob most people are looking forward to the demise of the Ames family and hopefully their prosecution and incarceration. And given your absolute unwavering and virtual manic support of the Ames family we suspect many would hope you end up joining them.
Good night Bob.
Please do not forget to tell us who has been sending you anonymous calls etc tomorrow. At least it will put to bed the notion that Mr.Newman is your nemesis once and for all.
Bob still refers to “his cabana” ….does not get it yet… he owns nothing
Well anon Bob might have a point in calling his cabana his. Whilst he does not understand why and never will comprehend much else given that Bob is the proverbial sheep he might be just right about his cabana.
Apparently there is a quirk in SVG conveyancing and land law. Apparently if you oay
Apologies but apparently if you pay a deposit for land or property in St. Vincent you have legal rights in relation to that land. Harlequin are using the same argument in respect of land that they claim they have paid a small deposit on in St. Vincent. Although they have only paid a small deposit for the land, they have sold properties to purchasers on this land and Mr. Commissiong Harlequins SVG attorney sees absolutely nothing wrong with this given the apparent quirk for want of a better term in the law.
We want to know if Mr. Fatchett understands this or was he made aware of it.
Fatsh*t is blatantly not a man with a plan.
Step 1. Attack Harlequin
Step 2. Work with Harlequin
Step 3. Undermine Harlequin
Step 4. ????
Step 5. PROFIT
What kind of twat publicises a troll on a troll blog to engage investors? Good one!
Ralph, Gmail accounts don’t show ya IP address, so pull another one mate.
Hey Bob frig all has happened I just mailed the real Ralph and your full off shit……….. Where is your pet plod and operation bt has you taped…….what a wanker
RH, dont be so impatient. Like Ralph, he/she/they/it I will publish the information when I am ready. Where is Private Dick I wonder? Even thinks I have a blue car! I can hear the knees knocking from here..
Bob you said you would give us the info yesterday. Do the Police not work on bank holiday weekends. We want to know who private dick is. The suspense is killing us.
Very original Bob he/she/they/it lol. Glad we did not copyright “it”. It is a pronoun and is usually used to describe an inanimate object. We are real people so the word “it” should not be used in that context.
Given the question marks raised about the lump of what appears to be organic matter ( Gooey Blob ) discovered by the Mars Rover module generally described as BC. (Latin) Blob Contignatione and given the extensive tests carried out by scientists to try and establish what benefit or function this Gooey Blob serves, there is a theory circulating that this Blob maybe a world in it’s own right.
A world of its own. A loner. A lost and little understood world. Akin to a miniature Jurassic Park. A world where intelligent life could not survive. Where what we except as fact is turned on its head. If this place was a human the only way to describe this human would be as deranged.
The English translation for Blob Contignatione is “Bob or Robert Storey” hence the reason for referring to Bob Storey as ” it.”
FDNRM: “Oh to see ourselves as other’s see us” – but in your case, I wouldn’t look into the mirror as the “Dorian Gray” resemblance would scare you permanently back into the famous loo and manic ipad manipulation. (Anything to detract you from the horror that is your actual personality and character). You poor deluded soul. LOL, Ho Ho Ho etc etc
@Ralph, not surprised it took so long to answer my last e mail. Working on some new figures on spread sheets to give to GF. Funny how you can spell his name right now you are trying to get him on side. Keep checking the numbers to make sure you have them right this time. “Private Dick” getting a bit impatient arnt we? Wonder why.
@icy4wtur, try and be original and not Ralph’s mini me. You will be doing the ironing next.
“I will publish the information when I’m ready”
Really Bob, what self aggrandising twaddle. Do you think the world has the slightest interest in what you have to say on the matter? You are a sad 64 year old loser from Nuneaton who has nothing better to do with his time than spend it trolling around on the internet defending a bunch of crooks in return for the scraps they toss his way. You are a pathetic, risible character and your inane ramblings are of no value to anyone save for their unintentionally comic value.
@Anon 2,54, I’m that unimportant that you have to post about me. What does that make you then? Can I send you a CD?
@FDNRM (Bob the Loo Hogger): Sooooooooo.. Predictable. (Remember don’t look in the mirror – you know what will happen). LOL. Ho, Ho, Ho etc etc.
Dear Mr. Fatchett, Mr. Walton
Mr. Walton we have noticed your postings on the RL website. Your unit is a resale unit. The spread sheets posted yesterday are sales logs to the 30 / April / 2008.
This is the reason that there is a variance in the property price.
The unit was sold according to the 30 April 2008 sales logs for £135,000. It was resold you in 2010 for £340,000 you state on the RL website that you paid circa £80,000 deposit for the unit we think you paid more like £112,000 as a deposit but that is not really relevant. Were you aware this was a resale? Were you able to get from Harlequin confirmation that the previous owner of this unit had been paid prior to you entering into a contract and parting with your deposit?
Did your solicitor get all the relevant documentation from Harlequin demonstrating that there were no incumberances on your unit?
Garreth we will explain the fraud in more detail to you later, but as you can see with relevance to your client Mr. Walton”s case. He was sold a resale property and probably did not know this. We don’t know if the previous purchaser ever received payment for their unit or if they are in dispute with Harlequin on the issue.
No one knows.
Bob rest assured the provenance of the documents we are publishing on this site and in this instance the sales logs can be proved. These sales logs have been obtained directly from Harlequin.
Ralph clearly does not care about Tommy or any investors. He cannot even muster the effort to reply to a man’s email and instead makes false accusations of proxies!
Everyone lets leave Bob alone. It is probably in confidential, without prejudice negotiations with Newman, Broughton, Private Dick, the Mumbai call centre and the UK authorities on the issues raised.
It will not be allowed to speak to us on the high level talks with respect to the matters being discussed to resolve the issues at the heart of the matter.
It will be covered by an NDA and confidentiality arrangement.
Newman and Fatchett what a team that is. Pinky and the Brain are reborn.
@Ralph and his gang, so the sales logs are up to April 2008, but clearly show number changes. This was carried out in July 2009 And your bullshit answer to that is? As usual there will not be one. Who will you target now with your silly comments? Back to GF perhaps? It’s about time you fell out with your Bessie mate again. Perhaps you should review your spread sheets and redo them.
Watching the RL blog site a purchaser has asked about the Waters Edge apartment block. This block was the subject of much argument in the Irish case. Safe to say the foundation is the only part of the waters edge that has been built.
What we find surprising is that Harlequin from the evidence contained in the court transcripts were well aware of the build progress of the Waters Edge yet appear to have taken stage payments from clients in the knowledge that stages were not constructed.
Bob again thank you very much for your last comment. Can you tell us how you know there was a number change in July 2009?
This was at the same time that project Orange was completed. As stated previously the provenance of the sales logs is un equivocal.
@Ralph no and wrong. The information is floored.
Bob you state that the number change happened in July 2009. (Be careful now Bob because a lot more people are looking at this site then previously. )
We asked you to tell us how you know this and you replied “NO”. Many others would like to know about the number changes too.
We said the number changes in July 2009 occurred at the conclusion of Project Orange and you replied ” Wrong”.
So if we are wrong on this issue maybe you can indulge everyone as to what is right as it pertains to this issue. To state we are wrong would mean you know what is right so tell everyone.
What do you know about Project Orange?
You say our information is floored. We have not compiled these figures. Harlequin did in 2008 not 2009. The number changes as per the sales log or as they appear on the document as produced in 2008. And it has not been amended since 2008.
We shall be producing more sales logs and more maps of Buccament Bay showing differing number changes.
If there is proof one has been sold twice, no doubt there will be more & that dear boy is FRAUD!
Anyone know how much land Harlequin own in the DR. With over 1000 units sold and an 18 hole golf course amongst the many amenities being marketed by Harlequin. Does anyone know how much land Harlequin own? Garreth, Bob, anyone?
@Ralph, send me an e mail and I will tell you. That would be with your contact details on. Otherwise guess on.
OOOL stands for
Operation Orange – ‘Orange Lodge’ it’s a new society!
Aye OOOL we remember well the sound from those Lambeg Drums as it wafted across the Antrim Glens in the wee hours of the morning.
And Sally O’ Brien and the way she would look at you.
We could fry an egg on the stones out here if we had an egg.
The memories oh the memories and lest not we forget the Pint of Harp.
So Ralph can you explain if your sales ledgers are 2006-2008 and show number changes, how come those number changes took place in July 2009. Would that not suggest your sales ledgers are incorrect?
what happened to Gary Player? and all the great golf courses he was going to endorse for Harlequin? in the wind…..
Hey ralph, its not a difficult question now is it?
@FDNRM,
Maybe one of the Ralph’s worked at Harlequin??
Bob the sales logs were emailed by Harlequin in 2008. The logs are an excel attachment to an email sent by Harlequin in 2008. So as far as we are concerned the figures are accurate as are the numbers.
But given your concerns and close relationship with Harlequin maybe you should ask them. ?
Dear Mr. Fatchett over the coming days we will demonstrate to you how Harlequin sold the Hideaway at nearly 1/3 of the cost to construct. We have those sales logs too. Garreth we hope given that you are now engaging with Mr. Ames that he will explain project Orange.
Anyhow we have plenty more bombs in our Arsenal.
@Ralph, the logs were e mailed from HP to Where? Wouldnt be to their accountants would it? Excel spread sheet? Now how easy is it to put an extra column on an excel spread sheet at a later date? Lets say after July 2009 when some one with a vested interest might try and bend the truth out there.Games up Ralph, you might be getting GF and his crew excited but you are just being too clever again. There is also another obvious fault in your figures, but more about that later.
Bob, You seem to know an awful lot for someone who’s just a purchaser. Why would a purchaser know about the sales figures?
Bob we know your looking to improve your inspector clueless skills. The email and unedited attachment was sent by Dave Ames ,to Dave Ames, Dan Ames, Carol Ames,Sam Comissiong, Alan Bell, Jose Placio and Juan Placio. Ask Dave for his copy and compare the exel sheet.
The excel sheet is the original.
So Bob how do you know the Numbers changed in 2009. And how do you know we are wrong about project orange?
Who are the other people, Sam Comissiong, Alan Bell, Jose Placio and Juan Placio.
I was a Skol man not Harp 🙂
Maybe my name is more appropriate?
Alan Bell Former VP Harlequin Hotels and Resorts sacked in 2008 over allegations of fraud. Samuel Commisiong SVG Attorney for Harlequin. Juan and Jose Placio unkown.
Operation Orange does seem like an odd choice for the Ames’. It’s not like their ‘Future’s Bright’ Boom boom! 🙂
Just a guess but I believe the Placios were the Dominican architects
that designed the condo towers. Really just a guess.
We note that Dave Ames is currently in Australia.
@ Ralph
I wonder why, The likes of Simon Terry & Co display such blind allegiance to Dave Ames?
@Sid, never heard of Orange Tuesday? Buy a Cabana, Ames gets one free!!
Double selling, that will be the down fall if true…. tick tock Matt is in the dock
@keep the story straight. The sheets have been published by Ralph. Well the doctored sheets that is.
how does fdrnm know they are doctored? did harlequin tell him that?
what a gullible old bob
@ASIAC keep up with the detail above.
Hi FDNRM, so for the record, are you saying that to the best of your knowledge, no units were double sold and it is in fact doctored reports giving false information?
you have not the faintest idea whot you are talking about bob
Bob please prove that the sheets are doctored. For once prove something. Yesterday we were going to find out who Ralph was. You went to the police and BT and you were going to expose everyone.
You claim to be receiving information from the UK authorities on witnesses in a criminal case.
You know that the information on Project Orange is wrong. But you refuse to state why?
You made a big deal about the court transcripts being published stating that you had spoken to the stenographers on the issue.
You attack everything negative with respect to Harlequin.
You talk about the defamation case as if Harlequin had won this despite ELS trying to strike a deal with Wilkins Kennedy et Al.
So why not just once provide something even the smallest bit of documentary evidence to back up your claims.
Ok one question Bob given you are so well connected with the Authorities is Ames still being investigated or is Harlequin?
Can you answer that one simple question without having to ask Simon Terry on how to answer it for you.?
Bob you have no idea who Ralph are. You have no idea how many people have issues with the Ames family. You have no idea who is providing us with information. You have no idea who is monitoring this site.
Bob if the information being provided on this site was wrong, the transcripts etc. Harlequin would be releasing statements claiming they were wrong.
And if Ames and his lovely wife thought for one moment he knew who Ralph are then he would announce it to the whole world.
We encourage them to comment. We do.
Bob , the Ralph’s are correct you have far to much insider knowledge to be a buyer , therefore it follows you are here for the sole purpose to disrupt and misinform-why would the sfo give you information ? When I contacted them by phone it was “I couldn’t possibly comment” so who died and made you king? The only way you could know if papers are fake is if you are familiar with the real ones.the only way you would know they are wrong about project orange is if you know what or who it was.my unit number changed three times but I couldn’t tell you when or why with any certainly , you seem very clued up for an ordinary joe ,Or should that be welcome to the forum Mr Ames?
@The Ralphs and RH (who really is a Ralph) Let me spell this out to you. You said the information was regarding sales ledgers from 2006-2008. I was told in a letter from HP to myself in July 2009 that my Cabana number was changing. This number change is in your 2006-2008 sales ledger. See simple. The sales ledgers cannot be accurate and correct. The info on the tel number will be coming later, dont fret it will happen. . I have never heard of “project orange” so have not commented on it.
Bob Storey doesn’t know anything. He likes to create the impression that he’s in the know in order to inflate his ego and sense of self-importance but the reality is that he’s simply programmed by Ames to deny any negative allegations against Harlequin in return for the few quid that’s tossed his way. It won’t last much longer.
Sure Ames is in oz? Seems an odd place to go when you consider the state of his “business”. Saw video someone posted earlier. I’d like to know how someone so obviously stupid managed to pull this scam off? Had to have been ably assisted.
A new phrase has been coined –
“The Mattvent Calendar” – like a Christmas Advent Calendar.
We have loaded it up with 30 presents and will remove one from each door, each day.
DAY 1 – the Golf Buggy.
Used for transportation around the resort. Matt will certainly miss this in prison. There is no way HMP will allow him to swan around the corridors with one. He will have to walk. Good for his figure.
Now, just imagine you purchased your dream cabana in an exotic location and were going to have a marvelous time spending your 10% return on your investment……… maybe, go over for your months ‘investor’ holiday?
But, YOUR cabana was being used by dozens of snotty nosed kids pretending they are mini Lez Miz Kids!
Or maybe, a bunch of sweaty LFC or Pat Cash wannabe’s
Or maybe used for a kids play area complete with pool tables and Xbox’s
No way, that could never happen………. could it???
@ Ralph
With all your information on Harlequin could you find out who purchased cabana 105 prior to Mr Walton buying it a few years later ?
This would then prove HP were selling units more than once, this alone could bring Harlequin down it’s out and out fraud is it not?
@ Anon 8:24
Nicola Kelliher nee Ames is the daughter of Carol and Dave and a shareholder in Harlequin. She lives in Wandering, Western Australia with husband Shane and their 2 kids. I can only suppose they are both in need of a holiday what with the exhaustion caused by that builder full of Blarney and the stress of the upcoming fraud trial of eldest son Matt Ames (GM at BB and disgraced director) starting on 9 Sept at the Old Bailey. A shame many of the distressed investors can’t afford a holiday (except 36/-Bob le Nob).
Incidentally, was going through some old family snap only the other day and saw Nicola and Shane hobnobbing at the top table with big mouth Andy Townsend, golfing geriatric Gary Player, and the over-coiffed Pat Cash at the One Million pound launch party at The Grove.
Now I know she was/is a shareholder but just who paid for Shane and Nicola’s flights and accommodation from Oz? Come to think of it who paid for Carol and Dave’s flights to Oz seeing as their income is quite constricted these days?
Maybe Manager Matt paid, he must be on at least £10,000 per month for riding round on his golf buggy?
Hi Bob, so Harlequin wrote to you and told you your cabana number had changed in 2009. They wrote to few if anyone else.
Oh yes of course you were also receiving a quarterly return again you were amongst the few if any to receive this too.
Orange is seriously suggesting that resold stock would be fraud?
So if a house is sold once and the owners want to move, so it is sold again for a profit, that is fraud?
That is what you are saying?
Really?
Moron.
Touchy aren’t we Fatty Matty…… 🙂
No, what I am saying is using the Mr Walton case, that Ralph mentioned, please see below:
Did he know it was a ‘re sale’, but more importantly who got the £205,000 ‘profit’, did the other ‘investor’ get it or are they still owed it.
Maybe Mr Walton should ask Shipley’s to look into this?
Dear Mr. Fatchett, Mr. Walton
Mr. Walton we have noticed your postings on the RL website. Your unit is a resale unit. The spread sheets posted yesterday are sales logs to the 30 / April / 2008.
This is the reason that there is a variance in the property price.
The unit was sold according to the 30 April 2008 sales logs for £135,000. It was resold you in 2010 for £340,000 you state on the RL website that you paid circa £80,000 deposit for the unit we think you paid more like £112,000 as a deposit but that is not really relevant. Were you aware this was a resale? Were you able to get from Harlequin confirmation that the previous owner of this unit had been paid prior to you entering into a contract and parting with your deposit?
Did your solicitor get all the relevant documentation from Harlequin demonstrating that there were no incumberances on your unit?
Garreth we will explain the fraud in more detail to you later, but as you can see with relevance to your client Mr. Walton”s case. He was sold a resale property and probably did not know this. We don’t know if the previous purchaser ever received payment for their unit or if they are in dispute with Harlequin on the issue.
No one knows.
Bob rest assured the provenance of the documents we are publishing on this site and in this instance the sales logs can be proved. These sales logs have been obtained directly from Harlequin.
If units were resold with the previous owners consent and a deal was struck with the previous owner, then this would simply be doing business. Neither the previous owner or the new buyer need to know any details as long as the transactions were done properly. If however units were resold without the original owners knowledge so a property would have 2 owners, that would be criminal.
So I am back to being Matt now? Grand, grand. I am quite slight as a matter of fact but luckily this is not a dating website.
This is all poisonous speculation and nonsense by cowards hiding behind an anonymous forum.
Ralph Newman will not even answer emails from investors he is so frightened!
I would not trust you or Jeremy Newman as far as I could throw you.
@ Sid.
Correct,
I am sure Mr Ames and Bro Walton and Bro Fatchips will get to the bottom of this; seems pretty crucial.
@TS, and you name was? Ooops your a ”cowards hiding behind an anonymous forum” 😉
I am not the one making wild claims nor am I stupid enough to post personal information on a website where Ralph has made a hobby of attempting to intimidate and “expose” FDNRM.
@Ralph I wasnt receiving a rental return in 2009. Ops doesnt your records tell you that. Quick change the spread sheet! Or should it be bed sheet, the one that Erica has just ironed for you.
@ TS, but are you pretty stupid for beliving Harlequin can work & Ralph did ”expose” FDNRM.
TS, I’d say FDNR36/-bob does a pretty good job at attempting to intimidate and expose posters on here (although he’s not very good at it). Sauce for the goose…?
How curious that Ralph only became so catty when FDNRM exposed the account for being Jeremy Newman and Erica Broughton.
unimportant.
Where is the £400 million, built 100 units and you think that’s acceptable, please explain that one…………… Maths never been my strong point.
Meanwhile, TS there is a very serious allegation emerging that individual units might have been sold several times over to unsuspecting investors and that attempts were allegedly made to cover this up.
TS/Bob….who the hell cares who Ralph is/are. As long as the
information posted has more than a kernel of truth. After all –
in the end it is the truth that will prevail. Denial is self-defeating.
@Anon 11.25 Who cares? I FUCKING DO! My personal details posted on here to try and intimidate me. My telephone numbers given out. But you ANONYMOUS can hide and hide. Knob off you dick.
Anonymous
August 28, 2013 at 11:25 am
Yes, if the information is wrong Ralph provided he will have zero credibility.
If however, it turns out to be true, it will have happened often.
That’s just human nature, sad but true.
Eddie yes an allegation made by… RALPH!
JUST RECEIVED THIS. READ IT.
Ralph,
Can you help out on this ?
All,
There is significant confusion about the numbering at Buccament Bay. This case study is based on a live client. Read the issues.
Our client has stated to us :-
“I can confirm that 5015 is a cabana that we purchased in 2006.
It was initially called unit 19 and then 30.
As I have mentioned in previous emails and conversations we have “sold” this unit (2011), but are waiting for an investor to now ‘complete’ in order to receive the remaining funds. ”
Unit 5015 was resold in 2011. Our clients have not been paid in full for this resale.
The obvious questions are :-
• 1. In 2011 a new sale contract will have been issued.
• 2. Logically, the 30% deposit will have been paid for this new sale to Harlequin Management Services (South East) Limited.
• 3. If so, why was the money not remitted to our clients as original owners ?
If we can track down the owner of Unit 5015 (on the current numbering) then we will be able to piece this together.
We have asked Harlequin to help us and to confirm the position.
If you have any information, please feel free to contact us and speak to Phil Haslam on 01384 889900.
Regulatory Legal Solicitors
Bloody Hell, this is getting a few down at the Harlequin bunker running to the toilet 🙂
Must be a bug or something……………
5015, bloody awful unit just behind the Indian restaurant.
Is anyone really that surprised to hear about the reselling of units?
@GF Funny how you want “help” from BFP readers now init
why not contact Ralph
@Sid it was all over the other website that shut down!
Which was at least run by someone who wasn’t just lining their own pockets!
@TS
August 28, 2013 at 11:34 am
“Eddie yes an allegation made by… RALPH!”
AND OTHERS! NOT JUST RALPH.
Dear Bob, would you like to confirm that your unit is in your name only or was it perhaps purchased Jointly between you Mr. Robert Storey and your wife Mrs. Karen Elizabeth Storey in a contract entered into by you both with the Buccament Bay Resort Ltd on the 29th of May 2008.
Just wondering Bob ?
We have a full list of purchasers Bob.
Fatchett has mental diarrhea! He cannot keep a thought inside his thick head.
@Ralph, are you stating categorically that you know for a fact that units have been resold without the knowledge of the original buyer and have proof, or that you suspect this has happened? There’s a huge difference between the two.
Sid our evidence demonstrates that yes this happened.
We are along with 3rd party colleagues currently reviewing a large no. of documents, we will publish our preliminary findings on this site in the next 48 hrs.
We can safely say that what we have uncovered to date is pretty convincing and damning of Harlequin and the Ames family.
We have just seen an excuse reportedly coming from Harlequin on the RL website stating” that the number changes had to do with hotel software, software intended for ease of use of commerce, not logging investor units.”
Bob
People have known your name, where you live, what your telephone number is, etc for a week or two now. No-one has been over to pay you a visit or flooded you with phone calls. You’ve had one blocked call and on the basis that everyone gets blocked calls now and again this was probably unconnected to Ralph (or whoever) publishing your personal details on BFP.
The fact is Bob no-one cares about you. You are an irritant and your unrelenting wrong headedness and blind allegiance to Ames can be annoying but the reality is that you’re just a sad old man who’s been conned like everyone else. Please, don’t take yourself so seriously – no-one else does.
Ralph,
Why not publish all the purchaser details ? Then we can see whether naughtiness has happened.
Bob,
If Ralph can name your unit, it would be fair to say, that we can then work out who else owns it with you. The irony if you and Erica own the same building.
@Ralph, now Ralphy just to clarify the accuracy of your “information”
Ralph posted August 14th. “FDNRM is a 64 year old man by the name of Bob Storey …. he bough cabana 34 for £150k in 2006”
Your Excel spread sheet, which is from your “records” from 2006-2008 shows cabana 34 as being bought for £105,000.
Now Ralph which is true? The post of August 14 or your doctored Excel spread sheet?
Oh dear Ralphy Ralphy, I have just seen your post above, now I entered into a contract in 2008. I must have a sit down your mis information is confusing me! What a mug you are Ralph.
@GF, could I suggest you check the misinformation being spewed out by Ralph. I would hate anyone to try and get a friendly reporter to post this information out based on “Ralphs” word. Well perhaps not.
Ralph,
Do you think that Matt Ames should run the “Little Harlequins Kids Club” ?
He could teach the children how to run Ponzi schemes.
Bob,
What is your new number ? It looks like 3042 to me.
Any other takers ?
@WOW, No we do not own the same building, we are neighbours in the same building. A subtle difference. At least I could get my ironing done. However as I paid anything between £105k and £150k and Erica only paid £98.7k then I think Erica owes me some money for the difference.
Who owns what !
Maybe he shares it with the staff from ‘Balti Towers’ or whatever the indian restaurant, is called!!!
Hi Ralph, thank you for giving such a direct answer to my question.
Bobit, is there any truth that you are setting up a love nest with Erica and that’s why we don’t get a peep out of her ?
or maybe you have got her locked up in Harli Crishna HQ, and subjected her to some brainwashing?
Yes Bob if you remember at the time your cabana details were posted cabana number and amount paid, we did state that strangely enough a 2nd Ralp appeared. Which was no us. Maybe it was you.
The list we have is real.
Sid we know that Ames sold the same unit to multiple purchases. On different occasions. We would hope that purchasers were not aware of this.
Ralphy boy, are you suggesting the post of the 14th was an impostor? Oh come on dear boy, or girl, or group. That is the lamest excuse for being caught out yet. So what about your post of 12.16 today, Another impostor?
@Anon 1.21. No one takes me seriously? Ralph and his gang do. Who cares what you think. You are just a side show. Save you time and go from here.
What I find strange is that Harlequin have not taken any steps to remove the files from the Reg legal site, that could suggest they are legit?
The multiple sales will be the end if it is true.
Fat Matt – is Matt Ames really that fat ?
TS, now, now,your just being nasty and spiteful about about PRGM Bro. Gareth Fatflaps
Did he not go to Cambridge, so he can’t be so thick…… 🙂
Bob we don’t take you seriously.
One thing that I’ve not seen discussed in the past is Ames appetite to keep the business going. Does he want HP to continue and does he genuinely believe himself that it will be a success, or would he rather get out and not look back. Is anyone who is close to him able to comment on this?
Hi Ralphy, working through all the paperwork now are we.
so which of the following were from you and which from the “impostor” snigger snigger
August 11th 11.33
Aug 12th 2.27
Aug 12th 12.26
Aug 12th 12.45
Aug 13th 4.59
Aug 14th 2.36
Aug 21st 8.28
Aug 21st 10.11
August 23rd 9.17/10.04
You may want to disown the last one because that information came from Erica. Just tick off the above which are your and which are not..
@Ralph, you dont take me seriously? But you certainly did, and you certainly should.
Ralph, why don’t you send all the details to GF and then he can actually do something? You are creating a stir, but just that, GF can actually take steps with all his ‘special contacts’ wink wink nudge nudge….. chickens giblets over the left shoulder 😉
Tubby yes he is fairly corpulent………..
Sid,
The problem is DA actually thinks he has done a great job, its anyone’s fault but his, when it goes wrong ( same applies for the whole family)
Whether by design or good luck, he surrounds himself with people who are 100% loyal.
This loyalty is rewarded by over paying and making them and making them feel ‘part of the organisation’ often with whole families being dependant on HP for their income.
Many overpaid staff know deep down they are never going to get the same money on the open market….. not even close.
Let’s take Simon Terry for example a basic of ten thousand pounds a month!!!!
That’s much more that he would earn should be about 70k – so being over paid by 50k – not bad……..
Dan Dalligan 3000 basic a month – but why, what’s he been selling….. poor beggar owed 200k in commission.
You see where the problem is…..
Sorry yes Bob given your relationship with the authorities we should take you seriously lol
Hey Ralphy, I’ve just had an e mail from a L Miller inviting me to a free weeks cruise. Could that be you? Was that your e mail? Have you finally “come out” so to speak and revealed yourself. (not sexually of course)
Yes ralph you really should. Now where are my answers to my questions on your emails above? Anyone here want a little side bet that Ralph tries to forget the questions. Its not going away Ralph. Are you up to date with the Data Protection Act by the way?
@LMBLDTRTBLSMITB, thanks for that. You say his people are 100% loyal but I’m sure that will change if the authorities start taking action. And I can think of at least 2 of his staff who he would consider to be disloyal!
Well I will give you that one!
Actually, the ‘leaks’ are fairly widespread.
Whilst we are talking salary each one of the Ames family takes a minimum of £8000 per month clear, excluding expenses and first class travel…. and the groundsmen, and the landscaping and the fish food …. and more and more and more.
And Fat Matts food bill at BB
Why don’t HP respond, if its not true?
All,
We are told from sources close to Harlequin that the Project relates to the selling of properties on the BB resort.
Our view is that a full analysis of the sales ledger is going to show over selling on a very serious scale.
We simply cannot understand how the amount of property sold can be squeezed on to the maps we have.
Never mind the land ownership (extend and title).
We know that Harlequin will never disclose the data as this would be tantamount to commercial suicide. However, we are working to piece things together.
We never even knew about “Project Orange” until a few months ago. Since then we have heard it mentioned by people who are clearly close to the Harlequin matter.
We need people to check their contracts.
@ Reg Legal.
Did you find the missing investor, for unit 5015?
Dave, Matt and Dan all took units at Buccament Bay, Dave still owns the unit that is now the reception.
They did not pay for these units.
Other staff members with units at Buccament Bay include Catherine Wooler / Manderfield, Sarah Tricker and her partner Mr. Derek Alfred Hillman and Janet Frank amongst others.
Other senior staff were offered units at Buccament Bay but chose instead to take cash from Ames in lieu of work done.
Agents took units in lieu, Robin Barrasford and Mr. Bird. etc etc etc
Extended family members received units.
Dave Ames has stated that is Father ran a hotel, he was a doorman at the Savoy so the hotel business was always in his blood.
@Ralph
What happened to the one’s Fatty Matty and postman Dan owned? Maybe they ‘double sold’ them to the agents?
I suspect, please enlighten me if you can, that several agents who think they own a unit will be sadly disappointed when they realise it’s FDNRM, Erica’s, or someone else?
There aren’t many companies that can sell their products many times over without ever having built them and still make a loss! That takes a special skill.
Please could we have a vote on who takes Bob seriously?
A simple “yes” or “no” would be fine.
No Bob, you’re not allowed to vote.
This could have come from the mouth of Aimless Snr.
How could he do that with £300 in the bank?
“We’re not here to save the world, we’re not here to change the whole carbon equation. What we are here to do, is to do good while earning a bit of money, realistically. If we don’t do what we plan to do in the next year, we’re planning on buying up to one million hectares, two-and-a-half million acres, of land and saving those trees and replanting trees in areas that have been cut down, and if we don’t do our job, then yes there’s going to be those trees lost and cut down.”
no!
“We’re not here to save the world……..while earning a bit of money, ………” Those words came from the mouth of his son Matt Ames
http://www.redd-monitor.org/2013/05/22/matthew-ames-director-of-carbon-credits-company-forestry-for-life-charged-with-1-2-million-fraud/
And how many trees did he plant…100?
all the talk about BB…what about the peeps who handed money over for resorts that HP don’t own, surely that is fraud simples
what about the resorts that have a token start like Merricks etc
who owns the now mainly demolishes Allamanada Hotel
Have you heard the old saying…fool me once, shame on you…fool me twice, Ames on you.
All this talk and still there is no evidence that Harlequin committed fraud.
We do know who did though and who helped him.
I think people are very close to proving fraud
Selected numbers without titles on a PDF? How compelling!
Put up or shut up Jeremy.
Surely the bigger fraud committed is the sale of thousands of units in DR, St Lucia, Barbados on land not owned and/or for which planing permission has not been granted, and where contracted building and delivery dates to investors has long passed. BB is just the tip of the iceberg .
Dear me Fatty Matty how rude of you!
Would you be convinced if you were given evidence that a unit was sold and the ‘investor’ never got the funds?
TS there must have been enough evidence to allow the SFO and Essex police go public on their investigations into the Harlequin Group. Criminal Investigations.
And Matt Ames marketing boss of Harlequin did he just go bad as a result of being cast out of the temple of Harlequin.
TS what about the bribes paid by Ames to government officials in the DR. The bribes the BBC asked Mr. Ames about in their letter. The response from Ames and Harlequin being that if bribes had been paid it was Mac Donald who paid them.
Great excuse. We have the letters.
TS Ames committed fraud on a massive scale. He did and even Mr. Fatchett knows this now.
Oh yes, that will be like trying to nail a jelly to the wall.
The bunker won’t want anyone to go ‘a sniffin’ …….no Sirree!!!
It’s time to start spreading the net a little further, what a mess you will find too – the millions spent on (over priced) surveys ……. stolen equipment…. people not paid….. Think BB is bad ….Phew…get ready!!!
a real con of worms.
Did I say Con….tut tut CAN of worms 😉
It is still speculation at this stage, but will be very difficult to keep hidden ‘IF’ true. I personally hope it isn’t as there really will be no chance of anyone recovering anything.
@Sid, It is NOT speculation it is FACT
TS it is not very odd that Harlequin will not come out with an update clearly stating that we are Mr. Newman. Let them state in writing that the documents being uploaded are false.
We have a few more documents to be uploaded tomorrow. Ask Ames to put in writing that they are false.
We are anonymous so leaking if that’s what you like to call it “Without Prejudice” information which will help purchasers unmask the truth does not bother us in the slightest.
You say put up or shut up. We are putting up to the people and agencies who will ultimately make the decisions and who have statutory powers to deal with Ames and Harlequin.
We are sorry not to be in a position at this stage to hand over to your good self and indeed Mr Ames any documents which might help him to evade possible prosecution.
.
What happened to all the talk of a Fatchett led buy-out? Is that no longer on the cards as it sounded pretty definite last week!
Ha yes Ralph, “tomorrow we will have moreinformatio” will it be as false and mis leading as the information regarding my contracts and spread sheets. There again if there are several Ralph’s how do we know which Ralph is which Perhaps Ames hasn’t replied because he knows you are full of bullshit, not like GF who has swallowed your information hook line and sinker.
The reselling of units has been rumoured for months and is usually dismissed when anyone has pressed the issue. Why is it suddenly so matter of fact?
Oh yes sorry our vote is NO also.
@FDNRM, Fatchett isn’t stupid enough to believe fictitious information. If he investigates and finds Ralph is telling the truth, then it will be fact. And that my friend is when we will all be in the shit….even you.
Bob any news from BT? Any news from the Police ? Any news from your colleagues in the Authorities. ?
As we asked TS how come your little mate Ames has not gone public. If its all lies Bob surely Ames will come out and say so?
Bob more and more purchasers are beginning to see the wood from the trees.
Sid anyone who paid money or a deposit for a property on St. Vincent has what they call an equitable claim under St. Vincent Law. This from Harlequin’s own lawyer in St. Vincent Mr. Sam Commissiong. lt therefore will be very difficult for Mr. Fatchett to buy from Harlequin the assets at Buccament Bay given St. Vincent law as it pertains to equitable interest.
We made Mr. Fatchett aware of this the other day and advised him to have this independently verified as we would advise any one who may have parted with money fir a property at Buccament Bay.
Hi Ralph, I meant as part of the ‘Rescue Plan’. Is that off the table so soon?
@Sid, you think Fatchett isn’t stupid enough to believe fictitious information? Don’t be so trusting of him Sid.
@Ralph which Ralph posted ” no” ? Is it the Ralph who posted details of my contract, or was it the other Ralph who posted different details of my contract? My head hurts.
@FDNRM, if Fatchett really does plan to be part of any take over, it really won’t suit him if he has to report Ames for fraud and bring the whole house of cards down. I’m sure Fatchett is investigating in the hope that he doesn’t find any wrong doing, but what he reports back will be the truth.
The Serious Bob Vote: Not taken him serious since he first emerged from his hole in the ground but have to admit he has provided a lot of chuckles with his “Goebals” mentality. Come on folks he is funny – a little deluded, an absolute pillock (in the Loo with ipad) but funny. LOL, Ho, Ho, Ho etc etc.
P.S. My Vote is a resounding NO!
I just polled the newsroom………..11 No’s 0 Ayes
and 1 “but its fun to mess with his head”….
@ Ralph, yes lots from BT. Do you know you can trace an address from a telephone number. Will post the details at a later date, you know how it works. Which Ralph are you though?
@icu4wotur no imagination, in the hot tub with my I pad. Thought Private Dick would have told you that. Where is PD I wonder. Hiding in the Wigan bunker?
Bob go away and make Elizabeth her tea.
Sid too much belief and hope is on Fatchett.
Fatchett is probably no longer a credible player in the game any more. He relied heavily on the information provided to him by Ames and Simon Terry. And in the absence of rebuttal evidence Mr. Fatchett believed them. He was definitely caught napping on this one.
There are other players in this game. Despite the protestations of Bob, Harlequin are looking at ways of settling the defamation case without the need for a trial.
The discovery issues pertaining to the defamation case would answer many of the questions raised here.
There are also other actions ongoing. In different countries.
It must also be remembered by Fatchett and more importantly by all the purchasers out there that another legal firm in the UK have freezing orders over Carol and Dave Ames. A judge must have felt there were issues that needed to be addressed.
TS alluded to the fact that Gareth Fatchett failed to obtain a freezing order against the Harlequin companies earlier this year, whilst this is not the case it might be good of Mr. Fatchett to verify this.
Lets not start the Crozier thing again, it’s only a couple of million tops, what about the other £398 million.
Who has £7k plus for a punt with Chris Conley or something like that? what are the developments in that piffling £1.1 million order?
‘Tea’ that’s a Northen saying………
@Raplh, which Ralph wants me to go away? Can you clear up which of my 3 contracts is the real one? So now we are taking the anti Fatchett route. Wilkins Kennedy might not go to court, but Jezza and Mack stand to lose a packet.
The several Ralph’s don’t seem to all be on the same level, who is the Master?
NON,
Nous ne pouvons pas prendre au sérieux, lui
36 francs
My name is Bob but sometimes I pretend to be other people so I can disrupt forums like this.
See Bob its that simple.
Ralph
Ralph, Ralph, quick I’ve cracked the 3 contracts, perhaps I’ve got 3 properties! Ah but there again perhaps I’ve been sold the same property 3 times. What do you think Ralph. I bet you know the answer but you will tell me later LOL
@fdnrm or what the fuss or 36 or dave ames which fdnrm are you tonight???
Fatchett does not represent me. Always. Not to be confused with cheap imitations.
See Bob a poster on this site can post under as many names as they like.
And posters have been known to post under a number of identities in order to cause confusion. Its so easy to do as we have just demonstrated.
But it really is irrelevant. The information we are uploading is real. But we are not judge jury and executioner. We cannot tell purchasers, Mr. Fatchett or the Authorities what to do. However what we can do is offer up information we feel is relevant to the issues being discussed. It is up to each individual to make what they will of the information we provide.
For example you and TS have for weeks tried to demonstrate that Mr. Newman was guilty of fraud. Yet RL on their blog site told a poster who tried using your tactics to undermine Mr. Newman that there was no evidence anywhere to suggest that Mr. Newman has done anything wrong.
And these are qualified solicitors who understand the law not some moronic burger flipping idiot who will do anything Ames asks of him.
And just for your benefit Mr. Mac Donald has not been suspended despite the allegations you have been maintaining nor indeed despite the Irish Judgement, so one has to wonder why he has not been suspended.
And given that Harlequin are desperate to do a deal maybe it is they who will pay Wilkins Kennedy, Mr. Mac Donald and Mr. Newman. But Bob you have no clue what you are talking about.
See Bob Ames would never keep you really in the loop because like everyone else on here he too thinks your a knob.
Ralphy, MacDonald is still at WK because he is a partner, unlike Newman who was just a minion. Lets just see how long he is at WK after the court case/out of court settlement. Of course if Newman was innocent why did he leave WK? By the way am I a burger flipper or am I on benefits? Who knows Ralph. Wouldn’t you rather talk about my multiple contracts Ralph?
Bob given the fact that you and Elizabeth never declared your rental income you are probably a burger flipper on benefits.
But who really cares. We will continue to provide as much evidence as we can to show that Ames is just like you a disgusting little fraudster and thief.
Now go make Elizabeth a hot cup of Cocoa.
Who is Elizabeth. Keep it quiet my wife might find out. Keep putting the information up Ralph, the more you put up the more stupid you look. Any more doctored excel spread sheets yet? You seem to be ignoring the question regarding my contracts. Come on Ralph not like you to dodge a question is it?
Elizabeth? She’s your wife. Karen Elizabeth, but we prefer to just call her Elizabeth. Don’t worry Bob the information we are providing is not really for your benefit. And you and Karen only have one Valid contract.
For how much is my contract Ralph. The figure in the post of 12th August, the amount on your fiddled spread sheet or the contract dated 2008. Which one is it Ralph?
Mrs Bob is Karen Elizabeth
She’s the one in the holiday photos with the cats bum face becos her husband Bob spent all their precious time in france on his iphone/pad posting crap about HP to forums and neglected her.
She’s got a cat”s bum’s face cause she married Bob. Full stop.
She’s got s cat’s bum’s face now? Lol wait till she looses her half share in her Buccament cabana. And her home lol.
Note to Karen also known as Poor long suffering mrs bob
1 take Bob’s iPhone/pad
2 aim for his scrotum and lob gadget hard in upward motion
3 he’ll never crap in yer bathroom again luv – guaranteed
4 if youre really lucky he’ll never speak again either
5 take a pic on yer phone and put it on ebay youll get the price of his cabana for it.
@Ralph just wondered where the links are to the usual publications. If your revelations are such dynamite where is the Echo exposé , where is ifaonline with its revelations. No you have been exposed for what you are. A bully and a fraud. Wasn’t Newman accused of being a fraud?
For Christ’s sake, BFP, put a stop to this miserable bollocks. Some depressing idiots gave their money to an idiot. Got it.
Now move on.
Ralph – You clearly have the upper hand. Please don’t lower
yourself to Bob’s level. Some of us are beginning to be
uncomfortable with you recent posts that have denigrated into
a schoolyard –are too, am not-are too, am not. You information
is much more important than engaging Bob in such silliness.
For Christ’s sake, BFP, put a stop to this miserable bollocks. Some depressing idiots gave their money to an idiot. Got it.
Now move on.
Bob,
2006-8 Contracts
Under these contracts stage payments were made.
Bob, you only owe about 10% – correct ?
ooh get that acute accent in expose fdnrm
how sofistikated of you
50 Completers – who are these idiots ?
Bob – what happens if someone buys your unit.
Ha ha I pad put it on all by itself. Cannot take credit for that.
Ralph,
Rumour has it you are able to publish the names of the purchasers on the early phase.
Is that true ?
Hope so.
I hear a rumour that Ralph has the complete Phase 1 buyer database.
Will he reveal ?
All in good time Bob, all in good time. Hypocritical of you to call others bullies lol.
And its only you and TS who have insinuated that Mr. Newman is a fraud.
Even Gareth Fatchet and RL state on their website that there is no evidence to suggest that Mr. Newman committed fraud.
But you do seem to have this manic obsession with us, Wilkins Kennedy, Mac Donald and Newman.
We do look forward to the day when you are served with your court summons for defamation. Now that is going to be one fascinating defence.
Looking forward to your critique of the bribery information and the proof of forgery etc etc.
Funnily enough a copy of Project Orange is available for pound notes.
Email me on projectorangeharlequin@gmail.com and I will get a copy to you.
Naughty naughty David !!!
Apologies anon but we are just toying with Bob in our quieter moments.
Ralph,
Have you read Project Orange ?
S&F
The RL twitter account (risk_warning) is suggesting a Letter of Intent has been signed.
This maybe part of the plan discussed over the weekend.
No your not Ralphy. Trying your bullying tactics again? Court summons? Bring it on dummy. Going to answer any questions? No thought not.
@Naranja
Its looking more and more likely, that FDNRM cabana is close to the stinking cesspit of a pond, near the back passage to India restaurant.
Bob,
I will lend you the money to complete. I will need a charge on your house mind.
At least then you can salvage something.
Liquidation is looking more and more likely now as Ames has no money.
I think he ‘toys’ with himself on the bog whilst posting.
@Tropicana –
Ralph holds the key to the dodgy numbering.
Bob is the last centurion at the gate. Protecting Ames.
Bob, will you be going to the Old Bailey on the 9th with David ?
Will you get the judge onto BFP and out blog him, thereby securing a Not Guilty verdict ?
Or will you nip round Matt’s house and steal his wife’s panties while he is “away”.
Just imagine the ecstasy of being so close to the offspring of the great Dave !
You will not be able to hold back.
@pas
I suspect he is one of the few people who can defecate and masturbate at the same time. That is a skill. Hats off to Bob.
Aye son this it’s a fab plan, lets sell the units twice, change all the numbers round, confuse everyone, but pretend we can still get 100% mortgages!!
When the poor peasants can’t raise the funds – them ’em they have lost their deposit and it not our fault.
If they get nasty, pay them off with other investors money 🙂
Please leave my Bob alone you are making him spend all night on the toilet on his ipad and I need to go to the loo with all the stuff Ralph is posting.
Daddy this is just for you
The following lawyers from DLA Piper were brought in by Harlequin to give advice. They operated under the code name Project Orange.
Darren Allen
Speciality Fraud, Corruption and Money Laundering
Johnathon Fenton
Speciality Pension Schemes, Investment Funds and Investment Management
Karen Friebe
Commercial Real Estate, Acquisition, development and disposal of Hotel assets.
Ben Taylor
Legal Director DLA Piper
Now back to the matter in hand ( no pun intended Bobit bobbies helmet)
Ralph, Ames is on the ropes ( instead of in them 😉 )
How is he going to be pushed out of the ring? We need something more that can be acted upon……
@Bob’s wet dream
That’s enough excitement for Bob, he will be having a little sex wee in his grubby Y fronts…………… The ones he Nicked off DA washing line.
@ Ralph,
Listen you tw*t I will come round and stick me bobbies helmet the full length up your bum ole – if ya carry one
Ralph, dal piper dropped harlequin because a) they were not paying their bills b) they were dodgy.
Jack bowman, agree. Ames looks like, talks like, and is a simpleton. To have given this idiot money is beyond comprehension. He has no experience in resorts or development and is such a blatant con man, all this carry on is ridiculous. Arguing about little things, and this bob chap, and bucc bay. Drop in the ocean, 400m gone, Ames spent it and pocketed some for himself. End of story, find a way to bang him up, liquidate the sorry assets, get some money back and move on.
anon…agree I think the time is here for peeps with hard real evidence to go to the fraud squad and reveal all…..deffo so much smoke there has been a fire somewhere
all the back stabbing on here, if have anything to bring ames down then you need to show to the appropriate authorities
@ relax you are on holiday
“.hard evidence…show to the appropriate authorities.”
And that is the nub of it.
There is a whole lot of information knocking around here which should be given to the SFO (and perhaps has already been?).
Why is it being posted here rather than being given to the SFO?
Is it my inherent paranoia, or could it be that the SFO already have this and have not (yet) done anything with it?
Ralph are you telling porkies yet again? I have no such statement from Harlequin in my inbox and I receive all updates. Where is this mystery statement?
Ralph as usual is spewing poisonous lies into the ether.
Panorama was dropped after they realised all of the info was coming from Jeremy Newman and Padraig O’Halloran WHILST THE FRAUD CASE WAS TAKING PLACE! I wonder what their motives were!
I wonder why the programme was dropped?
I wonder why Ralph is such a coward?
Because he knows if he went public his motives and lies would be exposed.
Perhaps those looking for a ‘killer’ fact to emerge that will prove fraud should scroll back up to the top and re read BFP’s commentary with which they opened this thread. Given the levels of incompetence present since the beginning of this business and the levels of inducement offered to agents etc on sales, I’d be surprised if there weren’t multiple sales of units. Proving fraud would require proof of intent, so it is hardly surprising that it is taking the SFO so long to unravel this mess (I’m sure that they are fully aware of the recent revelations presented here).
Amateurish has to be the accurate description of the whole business from the beginning and unfortunately from the sidelines it doesn’t look as if much has changed, including the investor lead rescue. I don’t know what qualifications or abilities Mr Walton, or indeed Mr Fatchett, have to report on or make judgements on the viability of the business but I do know that Mr Walton invested, which suggests to me some gullibility. That’s a personal observation, not an attack on either of those gentlemen (whom I’ve never met), but until I read it reported that either individuals or bodies competent in hotels, tourism and travel have made an assessment of the current situation and assets then I find it very hard to believe that there is any credible way forward for those who have unwisely invested in this business.
Ralph why would Harlequin engage the desperate nutter with sandwich boards and screaming about the end of the world?
Gareth Fatchett clearly has terrible judgement or he is that desperate for publicity that he will listen to an “anonymous” poster who has already been exposed many times as a liar.
Well TS, time will tell. To be fair to Ralph, he hasn’t just made a comment about the reselling of units, he has provided what he considers to be evidence to a lawyer who he has asked to validate it. Sounds confident to me….or very stupid if he really has doctored the reports, but I don’t think anyone could be that stupid.
If you are right though TS and Ralph is making the whole thing up, then you must be pleased to know that he will soon be exposed as a liar and will be instantly discredited. We’ll know who’s right soon.
My question to Ralph is if you have had this information all along, why wait until now to make it public? This whole situation could have been dead and buried months ago and we could all be getting on with our lives!
Sid I spoke with my rep and the Ames penthouses document has been doctored and they confirmed that to one of Fatchett’s friendly journalists. The rest were just pages of numbers to my eyes so I have not concerned myself with them.
Sid many purchasers believed that Mr. Fatchett was going to save the day. It looked to all that a decent firm of lawyers had everything under control.
Well that is how it appeared.
But chinks began to appear in the Armour.
The equitable interest law in St. Vincent was hugely important. Purchasers in Buccament Bay all though despite having only paid a deposit of 30% have as a result an equitable stake in the property. This according to Sam Commissiong Harlequin’s own lawyer in SVG.
Had Fatchett not checked or understood SVG Law and rights as it pertained to purchasers?
We don’t believe so but do acknowledge that it may have been an over sight on his part.
We could not understand how any rescue plan could be initiated without this fundamental issue on the equitable interest being addressed. To us as it pertains to Buccament Bay those purchasers with the equitable interest have the upper hand.
See Irish transcripts.
The stance taken by both Bob and TS two individuals directly connected to Ames and Harlequin on the issue of the publication of the transcripts was bizarre. Harlequin had sent some of the transcripts of the Irish trial to the BBC, but they were being decidedly selective in what they were sending.
Bob and TS have stated that for the past two weeks the information we have provided is false. RL have taken a very keen interest in the information we are providing but Harlequin with the exception of TS and Bob Storey have remained resolutely silent on the issue.
TS, the old Paranoid Drama BBC program, simple, it got dropped because they got lucky and Mathew Chapman was a bit daft.
Many say, it’s going to be shown now the dust has settled……… but again who knows
TS I spoken to my rep and he said your rep is a liar
But Lord Haw-Haw, how reputable is your rep and should he be reporting on TS’s rep?
Close to TailorMade, if that has any credibility
TS, lets think this one through, an unknown rep, somehow knows one of GF journalist ‘mates’ who admitted to ‘doctoring’ a document.
Do you know how silly that sounds?
Karma you clearly did not read my post properly so I will explain.
My rep told me that the document was doctored.
My rep also told me that a journalist known to be friendly with Fatchett contacted Harlequin about said document and they were also informed that the document was doctored.
If that sounds silly you have a very odd sense of humour.
Why would anyone believe a Harlequin Rep? They have not exactly covered themselves in glory to date. In fact, they have openly told lies on occasions too numerous to list.
I think we have passed the point of speculation. We just need to see what Fatchett uncovers.
I would rather trust Ralph than fat arse fatttchett, he is playing both sides wanker
Please, please, ask someone to check before you press ‘post comment’ and less vulgarities.
So, you would rather ‘trust’ an anonymous poster that a solicitor with an unblemished record how strange.
Mind you you are a little thick investing with Ames and all that. 🙂
@FDNRM
See you have posted on the HIG site. Are you going to change your name to be consistent !
Has Ames sent you on there ?
@Ralph
The Orange Project will be the downfall of the Harlequin empire.
I have nothing to hide. And Fatchett still does not represent me.
Do you think that the evidence of the future brother of the Queen of England is going to be disbelieved ?
A new phrase has been coined –
“The Mattvent Calendar” – like a Christmas Advent Calendar.
We have loaded it up with 30 presents and will remove one from each door, each day.
Day 2
Managers ‘Cock’ Tail evening at Buccament Bay.
This rather strange phenomenon is when the ‘Management’ of Buccament Bay dress in long pants and skirts to meet the guests. All the guests are expected to do the same as it’s considered posh in Essex circles.
The sole purpose of this is unknown, but I believe it’s makes Fatty Matty feel like he has a ‘real job’ prior to prison.
The royal family are not keeping great company these days if Mrs Windsor’s brother is posting on BFP.
But of course he is not.
All,
Resale Properties
We are very keen to understand the process for re-sales of property on Buccament Bay. We understand that many of the earlier purchasers (who contracted with Buccament Bay Resort Limited) have resold their properties using the resale process.
1. We have asked how the re-sale prices were determined. Our expectation is that the new resale value would be made by reference to a formal valuation. The “list prices” appeared to be on an upward only trend during the whole 2006-2012 period.
2. We have asked whether the Original Purchaser contracted direct with the New Purchaser. It would seem logical if a resale has occurred that this should occur. If the two parties are not connected and Harlequin simply issues a new contract, then how do the Original Purchaser and the New Purchaser enforce rights against each other ?
3. Any resale profit is only to be paid on completion. However, Agent commission / HMSSE commission is paid on deposits being paid. Remember, the commission is paid as a % (10-12 usually) of the contract price, not the deposit amount.
4. We are told that 50 people are ready to complete. If they do complete, will the proceeds be applied to the units holding the resale profit ?
We have a very good picture of the original buyer population at Buccament Bay and want to be able to understand the level and extent of both the price increases and the profit expectation linked the to original units.
Why are we interested in this issue ?
We need to understand the actual position of Harlequin in order that we can advise our investors of the best course of action to take. The commission on sales rather than completions and the upward only valuations are material issues.
Harlequin – Queries
We have asked Harlequin for their explanation of points (1-4). We are more than happy to publish any response on the forum facility.
Conclusion
If you have resold or bought a resale, then we would like to hear from you.
We have a significant amount of data from people identifying their units. Keep these coming.
Any queries, please call us 01384 889900.
Regulatory Legal Solicitors
Bob / FDNRM has stated on the HIG forum that he is “still” obtaining a return on his investment. He is unique in this.
Sadly this clearly demonstrates that he is more then just a purchaser.
He has also claimed on here his close relationship with the authorities.
This deserves a little bit more attention by the relevant authorities given the very special status held by Mr. Storey in Harlequin.
There can be no doubt as to the lack of impartiality in Mr. Storey’s case.
Bob also claims he was invited to post on the HIG site. He must be very special indeed.
He makes a number of statements on the HIG site including stating that Mrs. Broughton is involved with providing information on BFP. We think you will all agree that Mrs. Broughton has commented on this site as has Mr. Walton, Mr. Ingham, Mt. Fatchett and indeed Bob himself amongst many many others.
Bob seeks to attack Mr. Newman on this site, then turns on Mrs. Broughton on the HIG site.
He is also refusing to answer questions on the HIG blog site.
There is absolutely no doubt in our minds that Bob is complicit in the very serious fraud being undertaken by Harlequin and Ames. And when this fraud is finally uncovered we would hope that Mr. Storey is held accountable for his actions on this and the HIG sites.
TS on the matter of good company, is Mr. James Middleton going to be giving evidence in the criminal Trial of Matt Ames due to commence in the Old Bailey next week?
Could Bob be in trouble of receiving a payment in order to upset mislead people?
@anoyone who has a dirty deal with Ames, why do you use this ID when you are RL?
@Ralphy, if you are going to stalk me please quote me correctly. Where is the word “still” in my post on the HIG. Site? I did not refuse to answer questions on the HIG site. Perhaps you can post those “questions” on here.
Ralph, the noose is tightening, action is not far away. I thought I was insignificant yet you spend so much time posting about me. Tick TOC.
Trouble is my old son you played all your cards too early. Remember everything is traceable. Ask your friend Private Dick.
Please, check my logic here, calculations are just an illustration.
First Buyer £150,000
Commission £15,000 to agent
Deposit £45,000
Now, because Harlequin product is a truly unique product in a depressed Worldwide market and it ONLY EVER GOES UP !
So, the lucky investor sells it to another lucky investor, for a HUGE PROFIT!!
Sells for £400,000
Commission £40,000 to agent
Deposit £120,000
Now you see a problem ?
How does the first buyer get the ‘profit’ if there is no mortgage?
How much if anything did the seller get out of the second deposit?
What would Harlequins fees be?
Lets say this is one of the 50 completions, should the first buyer not get a big chunk of the completion monies?
Not Harlequin?
Bob you have stated the following on HIG
“John I can confirm that I am receiving a monthly return”
Not that you have in the past but you clearly state you are.
On the issue of answering questions.
Q. “Hi Bob are you in the process of obtaining title”
A.” You tell me”
“If all you wish to do is to ask questions then there is no point in my being…….”
Bob, god bless him he has been subject to some brainwashing – its not his fault.
Hey Ralphy, can you explain to Elizabeth on the HIG how’s your 2006-2008 sales sheet shows her property sold for £659k but she bought it in 2009 for £255k? How does that work in “Ralph’s” world.
And where is the “still” in that answer?
You stupid idiot Ralph. You are not capable of following a thread are you. The question was posed by Paul Walton, my answers were to RL. Let me give you a clue, you have to relate the answers to a particular thread, not the order they are posted on their web site! Let me guess this is “thick Ralph” the imposter not the real Ralph. Still not to worry Ralph, you will be exposed soon.
http://sevencapital.co.uk/real-estate/case-studies/lincoln
Why would they want to get involved with Ames? They are just after the assets.
Anyway, it will fallover 100% on DD, they they will be able to pick it up at liquidation for a song.
I would…….. why pay over the odds.
Hi Sherlock, I did inquire with HP a while ago about reselling and from memory I don’t think you get a penny until the unit is complete and the new buyer takes title and pays in full, which is when you are supposed to get your money minus a huge amount of fees that actual means you roughly get your money back! But supposing the unit never completes, then you will never see your return. Funny that, but I bet it’s probably not illegal if the intention is that they will complete ‘one day’. It just means HP collect 2 deposits for a unit that will never physically exist.
FDNRM You are so full of shit! Remember this from yesterday?
Fatchett does not represent me.
August 28, 2013 at 7:16 pm
Fatchett does not represent me. Always. Not to be confused with cheap imitations.
And this……
Fatchett does not represent me.
August 14, 2013 at 4:27 pm
@Ralph, Jeremy Newman, interested in WW11 and fraud.
Home address:5 Hasting Close, Bray, Maidenhead, SL6 2DA
Martin Macdonald, Ex accountant Wilkins Kennedy
Home address: 202 Thorpe Hall Avenue, Thorpe Bay, Southend on Sea, Essex, SS1 3SE
So lets understand how you have your information.
When the SFO came to see me they has placed a Section 2 on Wilkins Kennedy and retrieved all the accountants information. That MacDonald was your information which included the Cabanna change from 23 to 34. That happened in 2009 when you were still employed by WK.
So we all know who “Ralf” is, or are, Newman and MacDonald.
So Ralf lets hope your “outing” does not lead to anything more unpleasant like Erica photographing my car. Everything is traceable these days.
So when are you going to post your transcripts?
When did Erica take pictures of your car? Or are you letting Mr Ingham post as you?? Idiot!
£659k? Who values these things?
@ Sid,
Yep that’s what I was thinking, plus fees for selling no doubt.
Its almost looks like…… a Ponzi scheme!!!
How to complete without mortgages? The poor fools completing!!!!!
@Sid
The ‘values’ are just made up – to suit the needs of Harlequin.
Goes something like this, ‘ Dad how much will the price be in 3 months?’
Mmmmmmmm, now what will make my gullible clients feel all happy and fuzzy inside? 10% 20%? Well it must be enough to give HP a few quid and then 10% to the agents!!
We don’t give a toss because we actually know there is no finance available
then the poor people won’t be able to complete and we can sell it again!!!
We have conducted an analysis of the sales prices of Units in the period 2006 -2011. The findings are interesting. Harlequin increased the value of most but not all properties in that period. However Harlequin reduced the value of some properties quite substantially in that period.
The sales logs we have produced include units that were given to agents in lieu of commissions. Ie instead of cash. We know that a number of agents were unhappy because they suspected that Harlequin were offering them units which were artificially over valued in order to cover the commissions owed.
This may well indeed explain the identified devaluation of Elizabeth’s property between 2006 and 2010.
The issue of the over valuations in certain circumstances is being looked into in greater detail.
Of course it could also be a mistake on the spread sheet.
What is fact is that some properties dropped in value on the value Harlequin apportioned to them in the 2006 – 2011.
@Ralph,
Is the nearly 400 units sold up to 2008 true at BB?
So, what were they selling after?
if its not resales or double selling or have I got my super detectives brain wrong?
Matt will have to get used to a bit of ‘DP’ but that’s nothing to do with selling, more ‘giving’ to one or more in the errrm shower area.
I always found it odd that all units seemed to increase in value by £5k per quarter, regardless of whether they started out at £100k or £500k, which looks like a great % return on the £100k but not so good on the £500k. It was clearly always finger in the air stuff.
Does anyone know what the occupation of BB is like at the minute?
I’m looking for a new job at the minute and thought as I spend half my life on this blog, why not kill 2 birds with one stone. How much is Ames paying his ‘online engineers’ these days?
@Sid – does anyone know what the occupation figures are for ANY period at BB? Secondary to that – given the number of units handed out as freebies and the number of weeks taken for free by investors, does anyone know how many people have actually PAID to stay there?
Kind of basic questions, but of course no meaningful answers.
Sherlock circa 1100 units have been sold in Buccament Bay to Date.
just returned to bim from a visit to svg (not BB) need to be very careful there when you mention DA/HP or BB…locally not perceived in a good light….so zero local support for the whole project.
The new airport is a long time away….no funds for either the asphalt laying machines and the asphalt itself it would seem so no runway for a few years
all going nowhere
As per an earlier post
1: If people have hard evidence of fraud, mis selling etc, then what is the point of hinting at what you have and letting a little bit slip in here and there….give what you know to the authorities….the amount of money involved and number of people….it can not be swept under the carpet by anybody (in the sfo, or masons [and masons do not support fraud anyway so they will not cover this up]
2: everybody seems obsessed with BB…what about the resorts where nothing has happened including purchasing the land…..I am sure no refunds have been made and these resorts must fall under fraud regulations….whats is happening with this area
3: the ralph (who does seem to have creditable info) and bob(fdnrm) who appears to be in on the fraud battle on here isn’t gonna solve anything…so ralph…give what ya got to those who can nail ames/fdnrm and fdnrm as you are obviously in on the fraud spend your time as a free man better than defending a lost cause before you have your retirement party in hmp
@ryaoh, idiot
Ralph,
There are about 2000 sales at Buccament Bay.
The double / triple deposit is endemic. It has happened to me.
I invested via my company (ibis) in the early stages. This property was resold to a private individual and then on to a pension scheme.
I am on decent terms with the sales manager at Harlequin. She told me this info.
Therefore, assuming the price was similar my stage payments and completion monies would have been paid from the three buyers.
This scheme is a commission generation machine. Money on sales for Ames and the agents and money on completion for investors. Problem is that the completions cannot happen and the old contracts will never happen.
The profit will never be paid.
Bob is different as he invested early like me and will have paid stage payments. That means he must be very close to being able to complete.
I can see why RL are looking for resales. If they find a pattern, they will know that any restructure process will give investors very little.
All very sad. I feel I have been had.
@Sid
20%, staff on three day rotation at BBR
@Sherlock @ Ralph
There is no way that any valuations were done. The prices were guesses.
They also increase in such a way that the new deposit always covers the agent / Harlecon commission. Odd that.
What’s going on ?
Dave never told us he made the valuations up and re-sold the units again and again !
We are concerned at our reputation if we get involved with Dave shafting the investors who think they are sitting on a profit.
What we could do is walk him down the garden path and then buy it from liquidation. That would be ironic as the con man would be conned.
It would also be good for us as we would get the whole lot without any investors moaning.
We may allow FDNRM to be the caretaker as a thank you. Only fair.
I wonder how often they change the linen at BB ??
@fdnrm you may call me an idiot…I am not an investor and don’t have to worry how my investment is doing….or defend crooks for a few crumbs they throw my way
Now if you invested in a proper development you would not need to sell your soul for a few pence
idiot….now that is funny
Ibis thank you for that. We note from our records and documents that your company IBIS no. X purchased 6 units and entered into a contract with Buccament Bay Resort Ltd on the 16 January 2008.
Harlequin had circa 1100 separate properties for sale, taking on board what you say with respect to circa 2000 sales that is a very high churn rate.
Wait until people start looking at other locations…………. Brazil / Thailand
arrr Mr Aim lovee wou bweig twim 😉
Bro. Inner Gaurd.
I have a report.
Mr Ames seems a little uptight at the moment, lots of closed door talks, something has got he preoccupied.
I think Matt’s buggy has broken down, or was that Carole?.
I think Sherlock, is correct here, Ralph – do you think this coupled with double selling if 100% fact – to me its looking like it?
First Buyer £150,000
Commission £15,000 to agent
Deposit £45,000
Now, because Harlequin product is a truly unique product in a depressed Worldwide market and it ONLY EVER GOES UP !
So, the lucky investor sells it to another lucky investor, for a HUGE PROFIT!!
Sells for £400,000
Commission £40,000 to agent
Deposit £120,000
Now you see a problem ?
How does the first buyer get the ‘profit’ if there is no mortgage?
How much if anything did the seller get out of the second deposit?
What would Harlequins fees be?
Lets say this is one of the 50 completions, should the first buyer not get a big chunk of the completion monies?
Not Harlequin?
In documents we have seen tonight Sean Ghent, Ames’s and Harlequin’s security boss has been feeding Gareth Fatchett information pertaining to Harlequin which has been false and deliberately miss leading in an attempt to get Mr. Fatchett to engage in “meaningful” negotiations with Mr. Ames in a bid to buy Mr. Ames time. A ruse that appears to have worked. We have also received information that Garreth Fatchett has taken the word of Ames and Terry at face value and made wholly miss leading and inaccurate statements to his clients and the HIG group. Fatchett is taking information from Harlequin and is releasing information to his clients and HIG without checking the veracity of the information.
This leads us to suspect that his Rescue Plan is totally ill conceived and will potentially put his clients at further risk. Mr. Fatchett also needs to understand and engage a second expert opinion on land law in the Caribbean.
BRO LLSMetc….. I think there could well be a lot of closed door talks…when Matt is in prison and then ma & pa and (not to be left out fdnrm) are also talking behind closed doors
Then when all the proceeds of crime money has been recovered (they are getting very good at finding these things now) they will be living of a state pension wonder if the pictures will have them smiling then
Apologies if this has previously been posted or seen by all.
You may need a good whisky, a strong stomach and a bucket.
It’s on Pattaya / D. Ames
And one day – David Ames “Property Developer” presents, in no particular order
Little Baga, Goa
Forest View, Pattaya, Thailand
Nirvana, Koh Chang, Thailand
Phoenix Grove, Pattaya, Thailand
Emerald Palace, Pratamnak Hill, Pattaya, Thailand
Lake Villas Resort, Mabprachan, somewhere in Thailand
somewhere in Bulgaria
Harlequin Island, Petit Nevis, (a barren rock) SVG
Golden Mile Apartments Palm Jumeirah, Dubai
Buccament Bay in St Vincent & the Grenadines;
Merricks in Barbados;
Marquis Estate in St Lucia;
The Hideaway in the Dominican Republic;
Las Canas in the Dominican Republic;
Two Rivers in the Dominican Republic and
Garapua Beach Resort in Brazil etc etc etc
A Harlequin Production Corruption
@ Ralph
You need to put some flesh on the bones of your statement about “false and misleading” information and “misleading and inaccurate” information.
You may know what this is about but without any detail, it carries no weight with anyone else.
SGD we know what you are saying and we will as always back up our claims.
If anyone on this forum have any doubts whether Dave Ames has commited a ponzi scheme or not. Go to youtube and search for dave ames presents harlequins business model in March 2010. Its a horror experience for investors who trusted him.
Fdnrm any comments?
So nobody is going to address the fact that there is nothing illegal or wrong with selling a property that has been given up by the previous depositor?
TS, are you going to address the fact it is wrong to sell thousands of units without planning permission, and not even start 95 per cent of them, sold via a ridiculous model that had no chance of working and with enticements that were impossible to achieve?
I hope I am not the only one besides FDNRM to have noticed that Ralph Newman posts various wild claims and so far has not supported a single one?
Anonymously posting selected extracts from the transcripts weeks ago and some numbers do not count as evidence of wrongdoing.
As others have said numerous times if it is some mysterious crime fighting group (which it obviously is not) why are they here on BFP posting defamatory comments and using a paedophile playground to share files?
No doubt this will lead to Ralph deflecting attention by asking questions instead of answering them just like he did on Harlecon.
Also observe how Ralph refuses to contact anybody even solicitors who could apparently help with uncovering wrongdoing.
Everything comes through BFP because they feel safe here to post lies without comeback.
Anyone who does not see through that is blind frankly.
TS, I actually agree with you on one thing:
Ralph refuses to contact anybody even solicitors who could apparently help with uncovering wrongdoing.
It’s easy to make comments for example, I have seen today evidence that Ralph, is actual Rolf Harris – give proof Ralph and stop be such a prick
A new phrase has been coined –
“The Mattvent Calendar” – like a Christmas Advent Calendar.
We have loaded it up with 30 presents and will remove one from each door, each day.
DAY 3 – The Parking Space.
Matt has a special little parking space for his beloved Golf Buggy, just outside his cabana. The is very special indeed, no other cabana has such a bespoke parking area,
He will miss these little privileges in prison.
TS & FDNRM
I would love to hear your comments about the youtube clip posted by DD
it could be BB, now we know where short arse got the idea from…………..
The big day’s getting close now. The little fella must be sooo excited!
I am waiting when this goes south, then I will be interested, I don’t like business partners.
@LSLE I’m just amazed that dd has learnt how to use a keyboard correctly.Must have spoken to that 5 year old.
@TS, looks like Ralph is now falling out with his bessie mate GF. Is that because despite all the discredited excel spread sheet being sent to GF nothing has appeared in the press regarding his “revelations”
@Ralph, clock ticking. on who Ralph is, or are. Which Ralph is posting today, good Ralph or bad Ralph?
TS…nothing wrong with selling a property that has previously been given up by the initial victim ,,,,,,,,, but then in your eyes there is nothing wrong with taking in $400million and delivering less than 10% of what was promised and selling units that will never be built on land you don’t own
Lets see if the judge agrees
There is simply no way you can take in £400 mill and deliver virtually nothing without there being some element of fraud…one chink that’s all that’s needed and it is finished
as your fellow hp supporter fdnrm keeps saying “everything is traceable”….it will take some time to trace all the dodgy deals DA had pulled, but traced they will be
att gonna be going down….they don’t book the old baily for three weeks without being sure of a conviction…then when he inside the inmates will thrash the HP story out of him and he will squeal like the little tart he his
I contacted Dave Ames and Simon Terry direct about the possibility of my cabana 105 / 5022 being sold for £150,000 prior to me buying it for £340,000. This is the first reply, from Simon Terry.
Dear Paul,
Sarah Tricker has confirmed that you were the first person to pay a deposit and enter a binding purchase contract for the unit.
There had been interest from other potential buyers who reserved and then withdrew before signing and paying a deposit. There is therefore, no other purchaser with an interest in the unit.
I hope this addresses your concern but please let me know if I can assist further.
I have asked Simon Terry to confirm in his capacity as a solicitor, that he is happy with this statement or has actually seen proof to back this up, Simon said he would have a look into it today.
Furthermore, when I asked Dave Ames why Harlequin didn’t submit some actual auditable case study for completions and resales showing the whole process, he agreed and said he will by next week.
I will keep you updated
FDNRM & TS comments about Drummond, thought not fingers in ears time ‘la la la land’
Relax etc – I bet one or two prison guards have invested!!
@MCiw£1 Just taking a lead from Ralph, I will answer that later. I think thats how it works in Ralphy land.
@My Cabana worth £1, good news, it looks like the global economy is on the rise and outperforming expectation, so fingers crossed your cabana will soon double in value. who knows, this time next year it could well be worth a fiver!
Thank you Mr. Walton for the update. The original sales logs along with the original corresponding documentation has indeed been sent to a number of solicitors and others with a view to uncovering wrong doing.
We can also confirm that some of the original recipients of the sales log data back in 2008 confirm that the data has not been altered.
Mr. Walton it will be very interesting to see if Mr. Terry is willing to confirm in writing the issues surrounding your unit which we see you have requested.
Bob we are fully aware that Harlequin are working overtime in a bid to try and identify who we are. Tick Tock Tick Tock
it is now 5 days since you stated you were going to identify those behind Ralph. Tick Tock Tick Tock. ?
Mr. Walton given that you spoke directly with Mr.Ames and Mr. Terry could you not have asked them to make a comment regarding the sales logs as published on BFP and then on HIG.
reel em in ralph….reel em in
@Ralph, all in good time Ralph, You will be unmasked officially, although we all know who you really are. You know how it works Ralphy, all will be revealed later.
Bob has proved he is full of bull!…all will be revealed …..exposed…..wait for Monday..tick tock …..what an idiot.
Ah Anon, Ralphs mini me.
Bob, comment about Drummond, what’s up selective replies? it’s difficult for you to say Ames is a conman, try saying it slooooooowly.
FDNRM: You spaced out risible egotistic junky! Pathetic, deluded and what is most unforgiveable – a manic (in the loo) ipad abuser.
Keep it coming, the mentalty reflecting your “Goebals” and “Walter Mitty” characters is real stimulating comedy – you truly should be on the stage with your smoking screen ipad. LOL, Ho, Ho, Ho etc etc
“Live…..from the loo….its Bob”
If you I-Pad has FaceTime Bob why not start streaming. The
number of hits would be phenomenal
Can we start off of the topic of Brazil? Bugger all built, didn’t own the land
Where has the money gone?……………….
No, surely that would be ‘bum time’ something Fatty Matty will need to ‘open up’ to.
@Ralph,
Just drop it Dave is my GOD he is my everything
ay mon dat FDRM is aunty man? banana up the booty 😉
Ralph, Brazil, Thailand, all the others, lots of people don’t even know they have a problem – how to we get the message out there?
Dear Mr. Walton
Mr. Terry will find it difficult to confirm in writing that your unit had not previously been sold to a previous purchaser.
Mr. Terry was in involved in project Orange and that dealt with amongst other matters the issue of missing contracts.
Mr. Terry will also point out to purchasers on Brazil the clause in the contracts the purchasers signed where Harlequin do quite correctly state that they were in the process of acquiring land in Brazil but has not done so yet.
The contracts also have a clause which also state that a refund would be made to purchasers in Brazil should Mr. Ames decide not to ahead with building any resorts in Brazil.
I am getting my money ha ha ha. I paid for my unit. If you couldn’t afford it you deserve to loose it. Ha ha
Being a member of my worshipful FDNRM group I confirm you you you beast, impostor!
The real deluded old troll has a full stop after his hallowed name.
Drummond is a semi-retired hack who was in court himself not long ago.
@Ralph,
so Terry won’t answer, cos he up the necks in a the shit? dammed if he does, (and its rong) and if not double dammed, ifs not cos its an OK request? not unreasonable was it?
TS, 9th September Fat Matt……………is where?
We may as well say it was us who did that. Lol . It was us Bob ok? He will blame us anyway lol
Let’s hope the deluded little maniac is not distracted by that post from his priority mission to expose us.
Funny, He already states he knows us. We are Newman, Mac Donald, Wilkins Kennedy, Broughton, Big Dick, Private Dick, Bob’s Little Dick, etc. And he claims to have proof from BT, The Police, The SFO etc.
So what does he mean by official hmmmmmm we wonder? Tick Tock Tick Tock. Lol
Well spotted, many people make the same mistake.
Ok back to business.
Yep Mr Terry ( terrified), will he be worried?
But not your true fans eh FDNRM ;o)
—– Original Message —–
From: nuisancecallsteam@bt.com
To: robert-storey@btconnect.com
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 11:37 AM
Subject: RE: form
Hello,
The traced data has now been sent to the police.
Thanks
Best wishes
Clare Herron
BT Group Nuisance Call Bureau Specialist
BT Retail
TICK TOCK
Will Terry be worried, no not really unless Ames and more importantly Mrs. Ames try to drop him in it. Which she will. ” Simon Terry advised us My Lord and we believed him because he is a solicitor.
Terry will claim he acted on instructions from his client Ames. He will hide behind without prejudice and legal privilege. He will hide behind his profession. But he is still bent.
Due to the fact its my wedding anniversary today and with my impending appointment at 11.00 on Monday I will refrain from posting on here again until after Monday lunchtime. Fear not my followers (and stalkers) I will not be far away. TICK TOCK.
@FDNRM,
I bet you a £1 (or your cabana) you will post
Let’s just try and find someone that Ames has not stuffed? ‘his’ people – nope…….contractors….nope….Tax…. nope….. legal firms…err …nope….
got bored I don’t believe there is anyone…..
No! sorry I am wrong FDNRM 🙂 he is happy.
@FDNRM Wedding anniversary eh…?
So where are you and Dave celebrating?
Maybe we will have some credibility on this forum now, IF you are taking the weekend off 🙂
@ TS
Saying that Drummond was in court recently is accurate but also ever so slightly misleading as the naïve might assume that he was in the wrong.
He is an investigative journalist who was in court accused of libel by someone facing a trial for extortion. The case against Drummond was dismissed.
He has published a few articles on the activities of Harlequin in Thailand including possible investments there by Mr Ames.
Ralph,
Where can we share all the original buyers and the resale information ?
Paul,
Has Terry replied yet ?
If as Ralph is saying he was involved in Project Orange he will not commit himself. Misconduct if he lies to you.
@WTF
Why are you so silent ? Surely this is Dave’s hour of need ?
George you should read the latest on Drummond:
http://pattaya-times.com/t12899-andrew-drummond
Drummond is not even a journalist now!
http://pattaya-times.com/a8129-andrew-drummond-s-press-credentials-withdrawn-website-may-be-next
Drummond has been charged and paid bail:
http://pattaya-times.com/a8054-andrew-drummond-pays-bail-again-after-charged-in-criminal-court-drummond-may-face-5-more-years-in-prison
For the second time Andrew Drummond has been criminally charged in Pattaya Court. The first time by a Thai and now by two expats. Drummond posted another 100,000 baht bail to avoid jail until the trial which is expected to take at least two years. So far, seven victims of Andrew Drummond’s alleged criminal acts have filed charges. Evidence is expected to show that the unemployed, former News of the World journalist now living in Bangkok has been using a blog website in order to gather cash donations from people who think he actually is protecting them. His supporters will have to pay more bail bonds so Drummond can delay serving jail time until a dozen criminal court cases against him in Bangkok, Pattaya and Kho Samui go to trial. So far, seven victims of his criminal acts have filed charges.
Is there an Andrew Defense Fund that I can contribute to?
Sounds very similar to the Harlequin situation. Someone who tries to expose criminal wrongdoing finds themselves being taken to court on trumped up charges.
@CST
I have not had an update from Simon Terry yet.
However, to be fair I was not aware that posting one of the email’s (that contained a footer saying it was confidential) should not have been done.
I never read it.
So, I guess next time, I will have to ask if it is okay to post it.
Looks like the Thai crims (and other sleazy scum merchants) are gunning for Drummond then.
@TS / Matt the fat
It’s not relevant.
£400 million couple of hundred shacks, on a shitty little island, in the middle of nowhere, is just simply not acceptable.
Go and do a few laps of BB on your golf buggy is your bored. 😉
I bets Mr Ame farang, lik ladyboy,
i doo spwecial disunt, fwor old peeples
Just the typical Harlequin response from TS. Someone exposes/comments on the Harlequin fraud or Ames, and rather than counter the facts raised they just try to discredit the person who exposed them. As if discrediting them some how makes all of Harlequins fraudulent activities ok.
Never mind FDNRM….. tick tock!!
Must be costing a few ‘Bob’ your defense, where are you going to find that? Maybe the tips are good at Buccament Bay?
Will you be paid your wages whilst attending court, with you only being a manager and all that, surly your not a director are you.
😉
It is unfair to prejudge the Matt Ames trial. He has the right to defend himself.
Ralph,
I have been assured that my title is protected. So you are wrong on that as well.
Also, I feel that we should now look to the future and securing Harlequin.
All this arguing is making no progress.
Ralph,
Do not worry. RL trust Mr Ames no more than you do.
Things are lurking in the undergrowth.
Ralph,
Please feel free to share any more info. Ames has not paid my rental payment so he can take a running jump now.
Paul just give a brief overview.
Then I will not get cross I will let it go this time
http://www.andrew-drummond.com/2013/08/pattaya-court-throws-out-another-case.html
Another side to the Andrew Drummond story.
Is that the real Simon Terry ?
SImon,
Why not tell everyone what Project Orange was all about ?
No, you cannot do that. If you did, you would be finished.
@ Fatchett does not represent me.
Of course I am real you really should know me by now, now run along and disrupt BFP like a good chap
Project Orange
Ames is a loyalist. Hence his dislike of the paddy builder.
Also, where are lodges most likely. Indeed, Orange Order.
The Equalizer, does he Fkuk – hope he bummed to death.
I now think Ames is a racist, why not call it something more politically correct, its just cos I have red hair.
I think you are all very nasty people indeed. Mr Ames is a pillock of the community and the head of a disrespected family.
So mote it be, off to try a new pinny on
All,
Brazil Investor Meetings
We are running a series of confidential meetings for Brazil investors very shortly.
Brazil Brochures / Price Lists / Updates
If you have any, can you email them to our project manager.
Brazil Refunds
We are keen to understand whether any Brazil investor received a refund. We are told all investors were offered a refund.
Is this correct ?
We are keen to hear from you if you were offered and / or received a refund.
Conclusion
This development is one which we have received numerous enquiries about. Therefore, we have put a project team on to the issues that this specific development creates for investors.
We are keen to ensure that investors in the Brazil project understand their options, hence offering meetings.
If you invested in Brazil, then please be in contact with phil.haslam@regulatorylegal.co.uk.
Regulatory Legal Solicitors
TIME TO FOCUS ON THE ASSETS
I have followed this forum for quite some time although it is quite annoying to read all the nonsense some of you are posting. My conclusion is that the followers and supporters of Dave Ames and Harlequin is not more than a handful. One have to ask their motive?
Make no mistake that SFO will get to the bottom with this and all speculation is without value, anyone with common sense just need to look at the you tube clips mentioned in the past 24 hours to understand that Mr Ames and his entourage are in serious trouble. Speculations and accusations does not solve the core problem, how to secure your investments and get any return of your investment.
It is obvious that we have some of the posters including Ralph, who has a sharp pen , who sits on lots of information related to mismanagement of investors funds. The final result will be decided by court and a judge but is still not a solution for investors.
I live in St Vincent and I am concerned first of all for all poor Vincentians who will suffer from a potential closedown of Buccament Bay Resort, I am equally concerned that all of you, some who seems reasonable smart, are wasting your time on the wrong things in order to reach a result in your efforts to secure and get back part of your investment.
I am an expert on real estate transactions and hospitality industry in St Vincent and the Grenadines, I am equally well connected into St Lucia and Barbados.
I am a total novice on the UK legislation related to SIPPS and IFA and how an investment such as the sale of units by Harlequin can be recovered. I assume you have some serious expertise in your groups including RL and HIG.
But, I can assure all of you that whatever your legal work in UK leads to, it will not give you a solution in St Vincent, St Lucia or Barbados.
The legal framework related to real estate transactions is not as easy as it seems like some on this forum suggest. It is not at all easy to close and get title as suggested on this forum and I would strongly suggest that anyone who think in those terms should not complete the purchase until this mess has been cleared, if it will ever be cleared.
The same goes for the operation of a resort. A rescue plan with the existing management is out of the question, it will only result in more problems and more debts.
I have said on previous occasions that you must think outside the box, there are ways to get a proper solution once the investors stick together, I will elaborate about this later this weekend.
Make sure you analyze the potential future of a positive outcome in UK and separate the work from legal work that is needed to do in the Caribbean.
I assume that Shipleys have a list of all investors who bought units and how much money they have invested respectively, if anyone has that information it would be a great start to structure a creative solution to get this mess under control.
Meantime I wish to highlight that Buccament Bay although management problems will have a future due to excellent staff and a decent nice 4 star resort in a unique location. With the right structure without any more crazy investments it is a base for all of you to enjoy.
Oh Mr Lars.
What a very nice sensible
Man you are.
God bless you.
All,
Where did the Brazilian Deposits go ?
On Monday 2nd September 2013 we will formally ask Harlequin Property Brazil (SVG) Limited (1) Harlequin Management Services (South East) Limited and the directors of those companies personally to explain where the Brazil money went.
1. The Brazil contracts are all identical.
2. The SVG company appoints HMSSE as intermediary. All the monies whether directly invested or via a SIPP are paid to HMSSE.
3. The SVG company does not have any accounting records to show that the deposits were paid to it. We will be asking the various parties to explain where the money for the Brazil deposits went to.
4. Our review of the contract does not expressly or by implication say that HMSSE or any of the other Harlequin companies had any right to utilise the monies elsewhere in the group.
5. Clause 2E “Background” states :-
“Should the investment not proceed, investors will be entitled to a full refund under the terms of this Agreement”
6. We understand that some investors have had their deposits repaid. We will be asking for confirmation that the deposit monies repaid were not from more recent investors deposits.
Why do we seek an explanation ?
We believe that the use of the Brazilian Deposits is a fundamental indicator as to the efficacy of the Harlequin model.
It is also a matter of the integrity of Harlequin who clearly state that deposits would be returned in full if the investment has not proceeded.
What date did the investment “not proceed” ?
We have asked investors for evidence from Updates and Brochures.
Maybe you have an email from a Harlequin member of staff confirming the position ?
What representations did your agent make ?
Did they inform you the project was no longer proceeding ?
If so, please let our project team have them. Please call Phil Haslam or email him on phil.haslam@regulatorylegal.co.uk or call 01384 889900.
Regulatory Legal Solicitors
@Mr Lars
Ames appointed Shipleys
Therefore, they sit on all investor information.
If the investor information was available then a sensible restructure could be put together.
Alas, the only game in town is Ames.
My feeling is that investors will reject this. Liquidation is better than having this nonsense for the next 3-5 years.
Totally agree with you Sid
So Fatchet did not already know the answer to the question about Brazil but within 24 hours does???
100 people on his website, BFP being “useles” obviously except for advertising on eh Fatchet!
Ames and family are a bunch of spivs, 7 Capital will lead them on and stuff them right at the last moment.
At that point Ames will try to frighten investors saying, it’s this or absolute certain there will be a liquidation…… or sign here.
My way or the highway, fairly cunning plan is it not?
A new phrase has been coined –
“The Mattvent Calendar” – like a Christmas Advent Calendar.
We have loaded it up with 30 presents and will remove one from each door, each day.
DAY 4 – 9th September
This is they day Matt is in the Old Bailey, its all about selling stuff he does not own and nicking the money.
Its all a terrible mistake and of course not his fault. I do have some vague recollection of something very similar happening with Dave Ames??
Perception is reality from someone else’s point of view you should not have borrowed if you cannot afford to pay it back
I doubt Fatchett does not have the facts on Brazil.
He’s looking to investors to corroborate that the money has been spent on anything but Brazil.
You lot make me sick, you want the life style we have; but all you do when things are delayed a little, you moan, and have a go at Dad.
Piss off the lot of you…. sue us if you think it will get you anywhere – scum all of you, F**k off.
Pathetic yet again by Gareth Fatchett and R Legal.
Why can he not keep a single thought in his head without sending it to the media and posting it online?
Maybe so that his VERY good friend Laura Miller will sniff around like a horny dog and bring in more clients.
Have you all noticed how no other journalists touch him now?
Matt that’s just nasty 😦 looking forward to the 9th
@ carol ames…like you should not have stolen £400 million if you were not going to deliver what was sold…you must be proud that you married a fraudster and gave birth to a mini fraudster who is not as smart as dad in covering his tracks
Never mind maybe you can apply for a family cell when you all go down for fraud and Ponzi schemes
@ Matt Ames…just shows what a stupid arrogant little knob you are ….still a few years inside will give some time to reflect on how thick you are…oh and don’t forget once convicted you wont be able to travel about the world so easy and no more setting up scams (sure dad will help though)
this scam family deserve all the pain they get….. arrogant fraudsters the whole bunch of em
gonna be a lot of peeps watching yr trial Matt…even more cheering when you get sent down….whats the saying…oh yeah one down two more to go (that’s mum and dad to you)
oh don’t try to pull any scams inside as them tend to deal with things very quickly in their own way in prison….actually go right ahead as someone slitting yr throat in the shower would give a lot of people a day to smile
enjoy your lifestyle coz clock is ticking tic toc click goes the cell lock :-0)
Listen you morons
We did not sell you anything.
You took IFA advice and now,you are too financially inadequate to get a mortgage.
You owe Harlequin money, contractually to complete the building work – you are the problem, pheasants.
Go and moan to Fatchips.
Some questions?
Why don’t the SFO slap a section 2 on Shipley’s? they must have unearthed enough dodgy stuff by now?
Simon Terry’s reply to Paul Walton ? Where is this report? Ames update.
Brazil, double selling , reselling, why don’t the SFO do something?
September investor meetings about what? With whom? Where?
Basically what is going on, £400 million gone, a few very average semis built on an island that’s not actually a very nice place, crap flights, crap roads and crap resort.
Ran by a family of wan4ers
Come on Guys get ya finger out, its becoming a joke.
Yes why have the SFO done NOTHING?
Ask yourself that question.
A few posters on BFP think they have somehow unearthed a huge fraud that the SFO and police have missed.
Jeremy Newman sent the SFO the report that started the whole thing and I wonder what motive he could have had!
Cue angry or insulting replies from people who know NOTHING but think they know everything.
I don’t believe posts are really from Matt…he would not say “pheasants” went he meant peasants ….would he?
And you are idiots if you believe the Ames would post on here AND use their real names.
TS – do you think that the Ames family are making a success of this £400m operation?
TS We see that the SFO updated their website on the 28th of August. And the investigation is continuing.
Maybe Mr. Newman wanted to stop the Fraud TS. Ever think of that?
Bob FDNRM claims that Mr. Newman made his first report to the SFO in 2009. A year before the litigation commenced against ICE, and 3 years before Harlequin commenced action against Mr. Newman.
Bob claims he knows all this because the SFO told him.
So much for Mr Ames statement (supported by Mr Cannon of Eleven Capital) that the SFO investigation had been called off.
How likely is it that the brother of the future Queen will be called to give evidence in the forthcoming criminal trial at the Old Bailey?
If so I imagine that the worldwide media will be covering the story in some detail.
Cut and pasted from a Buccament Bay review on Tripadvisor dated 29th August:
“The resort is quiet, under 50% occupancy and thats me being generous, and those who are there are families, and all I must say extremely nice, it did feel at times that there were more staff than visitors! Im not sure how they make the money to stay open.”
Possibly by subsidising the resort to the tune of 1 million a month from investor’s money which Harlequin is meant to be spending on development?
TS it is possible that the few posters did unearth the fraud and as a consequence notified the authorities. Now Mr. Ames himself stated in a recorded meeting in Manchester 3 months ago to purchasers and agents that neither he nor his firm were any longer under investigation by the SFO.
We are sorry to state that Mr. Ames lied to the purchasers and agents. The SFO have just stated on their website that the investigation continues. And they appear to be receiving information from many sources not just Mr. Newman.
It is also quite clear that Mr. Fatchett has deliberately failed to act on information he has had for nearly 6 months now that would have given him clear unambiguous answers to the questions he and RL are now asking.
Mr. Fatchett’s clients need to ask some serious questions of Mr. Fatchett and his apparent duplicitous behaviour in this whole shambles. Mr. Fatchett was taking at face value what Mr. Simon Terry was feeding him possibly in the expectation that Simon Terry was upholding the ethics of his profession.
Mr. Terry is an absolute disgrace to his profession and is wholly culpable in the fraudulent activities of Harlequin.
Witnesses have come forward in the Caribbean who will swear on oath that Terry offered them financial inducements to lie about the activities of parties Harlequin were in litigation with.
In one case a witness for Harlequin produced forged documents, despite the evidence being produced being proven to be forged Harlequin paid the witness in excess of $120,000.00 for the ” provision” of security services at the Merricks Launch some 3 months later, this despite the witness having no prior experience in security matters.
All this done with the full knowledge of Mr. Simon Terry. This is just the tip of the ICE Berg and we will do our utmost to see that Terry is struck off for his involvement in this debacle.
it appears the turds are floating to the top of the septic tank. Mr Lars, thanks for clear thinking and reality check. the endgame, IMHO, some vestige of a broke down resort that will need propped up with any remaining money. the perpetrator will disappear with the money and get away as his crew has done up till now. all the jibber jabber from these posters will be tears in the sand as they realize the money aint comin back …its GONE BABY GONE. the climax is rapidly approaching IF there can be some kind of legal authority with balls to stand up and do something. they payoff money WILL run out. the time is coming and
tempus fugit.
But doth tempus fugit fast enough ???
I seen the ‘nasty’ Ralph is on duty today 😉
Friday Simon Terry will not be worried, today he is being struck off???
We will work with Fatchett, now we slag him off?
Ralph’s, what are you actually trying to do apart from confusing people?
As our scholars have said – time flies so F***king do something
@ TS answer the question; do you think the Ames family are doing a good job?
@Ralph, whats you solution, you just keep spewing out varying degrees of crap, but don’t have any solution.
Simon Terry will not reply to Walton.
Ames will not give details of completions and successful resales; they don’t exist.
Guys I am such a sad twat I’m missing FDNRM ..
@Ralph, although I said I would not post until Monday, I need to clarify a couple of points with you.
1) I said I BElIEVED that Newman spoke to the SFO in 2009, not it was the case. Check my wording carefully.
2)your post of 2.47 confirms that Newman contacted the SFO. How would you know that Ralph? Did the SFO tell you? Or perhaps you have just confirmed your ID? Roll on Monday.
@fdnrm, Ames said in the meeting that Newman had gone to the SFO .
You remember the meeting where he also said he was going to be more open and transparent
Oh and answer 30 odd questions
Hi Bob you idiot. Lol we are still waiting for last Monday and Tuesday and Next Monday and so on and so forth.
See you on the 9th at Matt’s case if you like. We will be there. You can say hello in person.
@Ralph,
You should be a tad more careful. Mrs Fatty Broughton recorded the meeting you refer to regarding the SFO and Mr Cannon.
You do keep dropping her in it. Does it have her husband threatening Mr Ames too.
Tick Tock Ralph Tick Tock.
I am sure the press will be there too, will Mummy and Daddy go?
Come on Bobit, we have missed your little one liners. Have you been away doing a recording?
Bob. We receive information from a variety of sources all of whom we keep confidential. And given that we choose to remain anonymous (for the time being anyway) as do many others here, sweet F A will happen Monday or and other Monday or any day for that matter.
I can’t for the life of me think of a word that rhymes with orange, I am deeply troubled by this.
Until recently nothing did….however Beyonce has a little
sister named Solange…..guess it would do in a pinch…..
I am fed up with all this now, I want the whole thing smashed to bit and all the Ames scum in prison.
Wow Mrs. Broughton recorded the meeting. We know Bob because such a song and dance was created not just on this site but Mrs. Broughton’s site as well over the recording.
Oh yeah we forgot Ames will threaten any one who dares speak ill of him.
Well folks we are not Mr. Newman, We are not Mrs. Broughton. Nor Mr. Mac Donald nor Wilkins Kennedy.
We are Mickey Mouse yeahhhhh. Now Bob you and TS toddle off and contact Walt Disney studios and get us fired and whilst your at it why don’t you find pics of me, Mickey Mouse romping with Snow White and send them to the wife Minnie Mouse.
“Sporange” a form of sporangium rhymes with Orange.
Bob we have enough on your dwarf mate Ames to bury him for good. And we are sharing that information with all the relevant people.
Happy Aniversary
@Ralph,
Disney porn now your talkin!!
I can show the kid that in BB when they got bored of being taught how to be a Ponzi crim
I do love a good funeral. Ames’ bash will be a fine one with Iceland canapes and Asti Spumante (in plastic glasses) a flowing.
I imagine Simon Terry will be working on the eulogy now. WITHOUT PREJUDICE, of course. Out of interest, has anybody a copy of any written communication from Simon Terry which does not contain the statement WITHOUT PREJUDICE?
It’s not all so Simple Simon!
L’ étrange blancmange rimes avec l’orange
ou
Door hinge
Oh no. Bob just could not resist BFP.
Inspector Robert Clueless who’s hobbies include horology and bolloxology. Has just unmasked who we are.
Fast forward a cold February Day in the Old Bailey in London 2022.
Inspector Robert Clueless;
“Twas the reference, Me Lord, by Ralph to Mrs. Broughton’s gross breach of the official secrets act in taping the Manchester meeting”
Judge;
“THE MEETING! She recorded THE MEETING?”
IRC;
Yes me Lord she did.
J;
And where is Mrs Broughton now?
IRC;
Me Lord, after she escaped from custody, she sought asylum in Russia where she married again and now goes by the name Snowden. They have one son together called Philby.
J.
Carry on.
IRC.
We were hot on the heals of Ralph for some time. We had been bribing people and sending false information in the hope that Ralph would have published this. That way we felt we could trap Ralph. In the same way we caught Newman.
J.
Carry on.
IRC.
The breakthrough came when I was celebrating my wedding Aniversary in the chip shop I work part time in. My I Pad / I Phone went off. It was a message from Harlequin Hotels and Resorts based in Langley Virginia. They intercepted the word recorded and Manchester. We knew then we had Broughton. Our objective me Lord was to cut off the head of the snake.
J.
And what happened next?
IRC.
The following Monday we sent our team headed up by Mr. Ghent to take Mrs. Broughton from her home and…….
J.
You mean rendition?
IRC.
Yes me Lord. We flew her to one of our 3 bed cabanas (with plunge pool) in Karachi…..
J.
Wasn’t Ghent before me in that case involving the illegal sale of prosthetic limbs to the North Koreans?
IRC.
Yes me Lord. We had to use that idiot because agent Carter and agent Ruck were unavailable.
J.
Carry on.
IRC. Yes me lord………….
To be continued / adjourned.
For the record;
This transcript has been illegally obtained from Gwen Mallone stenographers Dublin Ireland by O Callahan solicitors Cork Ireland
Inspector Robert Clueless and the unmasking of Ralph part 2
IRC.
Yes me Lord. …. we began the interrogation of Broughton…..
J.
Why are the transcripts of the interrogation not before me Inspector Clueless.
IRC.
Me Lord, my apologies they are the copy right of Gwen Mallone stenographers and cannot be used. Further more the interrogation was carried on a without prejudice basis and is covered by legal privilege.
J.
Very well. What were the charges proffered against Mrs. Broughton.
IRC.
Me Lord she was in violation of the act of parliament 2013 which prohibits free speech and the passing of previously public documents referring to Harlequin and ( every body bows ahead of the chosen ones name being mentioned, including the judge ( no not Morhinio ) ) and the Glorious and most revered Ames family.
(Hushed silence in the crowded public gallery)
J.
She spoke out against the (again everyone bows) most revered Ames family?? Find her and drag that worthless pheasant (peasant) before me. How dare she. How dare she.
IRC.
Yes me Lord.
J.
And is this the defendants Ralph before me in the dock?
IRC.
Yes me Lord.
J.
Please confirm the identify for the court the defendants Ralph.
IRC.
Yes me Lord.
Mr. Newman. Mr. Mac Donald, Wilkins Kennedy, all 673 of them, Mr. O Halloran, Mr. Walton, Mr.Ingham, Mrs Crozier, Mr. Matt Ames (on day release), Pope Francis, The Archbishop of Canterbury, The Archbishop of Westminster, Barbados Free Press, Jon Austin, Andrew Drummond ( via video link from Bang Kwang Central Prison Thailand ), Gareth Fatchett, the Daily Mail, The Guardian, IFA online, The FT Advisor, laundry and cleaning news dot com, DLA Piper, Google, Facebook, WordPress, Mecca Bingo, Gala Bingo, Tesco, CBI dot eu, Orange Mobile Phone and Mrs. Smith.
J.
Mrs. Smith. ? Who is Mrs. Smith?
IRC.
Me Lord, Mrs. Smith is the owner of the pet shop where Mrs. Broughton bought the “BIRD TABLE”,
As you can see we obtained our evidence through the IP addresses found on Mrs. Broughton’s I Pad.
Everything is traceable Me Lord. Everything. Tick Tock Tick Tick Tick Tock.
The House of Commons unanimously passed a motion to use excessive military force against Russia because of Russia’s refusal to deport Mrs. Broughton back to the UK. The coalition of the willing included St. Vincent, Cuba, Venezuela. North Korea refused ( they were still pissed off over Ghent and the prosthetic limb scandal)
Matt Ames in a bizarre twist instead of appealing his conviction asked for permission to change his sex whilst in Prison. She is now known as Martina Ames Ghent and is reacting well to the hormone replacement treatment.
She married Sean Ghent in a special ceremony on the first floor landing on D wing, segregated housing unit in HMP Albany on the Isle of Wight.
After Martina Ames Ghent was convicted and sentenced. Dave Ames sold Martina’s wife and kids to some Eastern European human traffickers in order to pay the fourteen and a half staff members of Buccament Bay. He threw in a few free brochures of his new beach resorts 90% sold out located in Damascus, Tehran, Pongyang and in Yemen.
Carol Ames had a nervous breakdown and went walkabout in the bush in Australia.
Dave Ames is still selling, for two cartons of cigarettes and a jar of vaseline you can secure a beach front villa in Baghdad.
WHO IS READY TO SAVE THE SINKING SHIP BEFORE IT IS TOTALLY WRECKED
Ralph, the above posts are entertaining and funny reading , but does not help to recover investments or save the sinking ship. It is better to keep a leaking ship afloat instead of sinking. When a ship sinks and it is suspected that it is the Captains fault ,he will be prosecuted and tried before a court. The same applies with Harlequin and its Captain.
I do understand that most of you are trying very hard to put The Ames family behind bars, let the legal system take care of that.
All of you that are engaged in this soap opera and have important information which you think might assist the SFO:s investigation should send it to them or contact them instead of posting here. I assume Ralph and his group keeps SFO updated with their findings.
SFO is not going to prosecute them for small potatoes and it will take time before they have all the ducks in a row. A complex situation which most likely need an investigation not only in UK but the Caribbean as well.
Time is flying, and investors seems to be unorganized, bad for business.
All kind of legal issues takes place in UK, RL and HIG are having negotiations and discussions which will lead to no solution or any financial benefits on behalf of the investors related to the actual value of the assets, which is in the Caribbean.
Remember there is no more assets in the UK company, only debts. I have no idea how many companies they have in the Caribbean, but a lot and those companies owns assets of all kinds,.
I assume the Caribbean companies are not in any way owned in part or full by the UK companies which means that the assets belongs to overseas companies controlled by Ames family as of today.
It is absurd that they have managed to build up serious assets with other peoples money and the investors have no legal title or ownership to the properties they have invested in, just a promise. It is a shameless act by the developer.
They knew that the sale presentation in the you tube clips about the presentation of Harlequins business model would not be possible to achieve. Remember that those video recordings were done after they had spent at least 3-4 years on the Buccament bay Project.
Nevertheless it is never to late to change strategy. One thing is undisputed, most of the assets is land or buildings in the Caribbean and it can not be moved to any other location.
The question is how and when will the investors come together in an attempt to act and save what is possible to save.
As we say in the Caribbean, half a bread is better than no bread at all.
Therefore I suggest to all of you who are serious in recovering some of your funds paid to Dave Ames and his family to focus your energy to act as a group of Investors instead of various groups.
Make sure The investors have one common goal which would be the following:
1. A list from Harlequin on all units sold and to whom. List to be provided by Harlequin or Shipleys
2. A list from Harlequin or Shipleys on all units completed and ready for rentals so they can be identified to the right owners and inspected by the same owners.
3. Separate all investors who bought in St Vincent and The Grenadines, St Lucia and Barbados. ( I cant help you in Dominican republic as I have no knowledge of the political system, ownership of land and other issues related to real estate investments)
4. Appoint a committee of elected investors to act on your behalf for each project
5. Appoint an advisory board to assist and guide you in the Caribbean,
6. Appoint legal representation ( well connected lawyers ) in St Vincent and the Grenadines, St Lucia and Barbados.
If all or part of this can be achieved you are ready to proceed with the next step which is to recover what is possible of the existing assets.
If you think any legal outcome in UK will assist you within a reasonable time, Forget about it.
More will follow if you think this is worth a try.
I am firm believer that as an investor, never mind the amount invested, you must try to recover as much as possible. You cannot recover anything in the Caribbean if you keep acting in UK. The legal system is so slow in this part of the world that you will all be forgotten if you don’t act within the near future.
We are nations who needs ambassadors of goodwill and we do not want unhappy investors. Together you will have all support from the local community, but alone you will not be heard.
Turn your misery into something more positive and let the legal system in UK take care of any wrongdoings by Mr Ames and his family.
To Sid regarding your comment about liquidation, I do believe that liquidations can be done in different ways, the way is seems to go now, any recovered funds will disappear into liquidators, receivers and lawyers hands.
Nice try Mr Lars, but I think that ship sailed some time ago. If anything there appears to be even less desire for the different groups to work together than previously, RL in particular have stated that they will only work with their existing clients. Perhaps it is the perceived promise of the pot of gold waiting that is distorting the view, but the nearer anyone gets to a slice of the action the more jealous they seem to be of guarding their interests and the further away they become from finding a solution.
When I read statements like (quote) “We believe that the use of the Brazilian Deposits is a fundamental indicator as to the efficacy of the Harlequin model.” it shows just how out of touch with reality people are – unless it was intended to be ironic, which I doubt.
The review that St G’s D referred to concludes with this (quote) “But overall we had a great time I just feel like BB is a little confused as to what it actually wants to be.” That’s the nut, there was never any overall vision of what the product was that they were offering, and ever since, everyone is obsessing over detail of how the money will be realised with no regard to the fact that what has been created is a service industry which just doesn’t appeal to the majority of clients that it is supposed to be offering service to.
As a joke I suggested some time ago that the government of SVG should seize the assets in the interests of the nation and as time passes that looks less like a humorous aside and more practical. Without a major intervention it looks certain that this will grind on until there is nothing left with very little of benefit to anyone. If (as may well happen) the principles of Harlequin were then able to recover remaining assets from liquidators that would be a major scandal for any governments involved. Unfortunately even Barbados seems to have succumbed to the latest fad for offering citizenship to ‘investors’, of which the the net benefits to the nation are unclear. Citizenship conferred should imply a desire to be part of that society – but you will never see citizen investors at the standpipe or under the almond tree. Build a clinic or a school or other infrastructure sorely needed and then they might be candidates for citizenship. When investor citizenship is being puffed in the property pages of The Telegraph as it was yesterday then you know that the islands will still be (in that trite but accurate cliché) “sunny places for shady people.”
Ralph ….brilliant , funny and inventive . ……….. More please
Mr Lars you are correct but you will never get the masses to stand together against Ames they are not willing and so the liquidators gett what’s left and the purchasers piss in the wind…
The collapse will start during September 2013.
Seven Capital would be mugs to invest into this mess.
@Sid – I agree
@ Mr Lars, agree, but I do actually struggle why ‘Ralph’ is posting here and not giving this information to the authorities.
Ames will not give the information to RL or anyone for that matter, slowly slowly, catch the monkey…… just playing for time.
Time is running out for you Mon ami 😉
@Ralph
Love the script.
We think someone has scarpered with our multi-million pound budget.
It’ll still be made, but we are looking at a low – budget film now.
Inspector Robert Clueless could be played by a pickled sheep’s brain in a jam jar.
Nobody will notice.
We have some glove puppets and old sock and today we are holding auditions for other characters in the fruit & veg aisle at Lidl. We already have some oranges to play the oranges. Though I did have to eat one of them.
Ames and Simple Simon are concerned about what level of information RL have (or don’t have) Panic..
Ames needs to come up with a plan for Shipley’s but he has nothing concrete – we have been here before.
Its a one horse race, Seven Capital or nothing – Its looking like nothing.
Beware of the
‘Your only chance to stop liquidation is to sign all you rights away NOW’ This will be Ames plan if things progress.
I believe this will be offered to investors with the intention of panicking them to agreeing to his terms.
I think Dave Ames is a deformed potato
I some how suspect that “Ralph” has and or is cooperating fully with the authorities and others with a vested interest in Harlequin.
If Ralph is who I suspect him or more importantly them to be I suspect that Ames rues the day he began what he began with them.
If they are who I believe them to be, they arebtoo well
A new phrase has been coined –
“The Mattvent Calendar” – like a Christmas Advent Calendar.
We have loaded it up with 30 presents and will remove one from each door, each day.
DAY 5 – Plastic glasses and cheap Rose wine.
This particular Buccament Bay tradition has its roots firmly based in Essex.
Rose wine in a plastic glass is the ‘must have’ when entertaining fellow chav’s whilst showing off in your Yardden ( a back yard, Essex folk think of as a garden especially if adorned with a couple of planks of decking and a B&Q plant)
Ralph is too well connected. Why does RL not work with them?
We need help.
Maybe they are? Maybe………….. project Hot Potato is a good name?
Bro Leaky etc…Ames and simon should be more concerned about what info the SFO have. GF should be concerned about information he has of wrong doing, but has not shared with the SFO (if any)
Ralph should give everything to the SFO and stop the wind up game he is playing
Brazil.
Deposits swiped and refunds paid from other investors.
Ralph – why not help RL with the missing informations ?
RL are clearly getting fed up of Ames.
We would like to confirm that we are cooperating fully with all the relevant agencies.
We are considering our position with respect to Garreth Fatchett and RL.
Given the sensitive nature of the information we have on Harlequin and the information we have furnished the various agencies we need to be careful in our dealings with Mr. Fatchett.
He has already demonstrated a duplicitous side to his character. We would be delighted to work and assist RL but we have to be cognisant of the fact that RL and Fatchett are only answerable to their clients who form a very small percentage of overall creditors.
Ralph,
RL has all the statutory demands lined up against the key Harlequin companies.
You clearly are not that much in the know about this element. Otherwise you would be able to hint at the background war that is being fought.
As for the relevant authorities, I suspect they already know and are waiting to see whether a “rescue” can happen. If not, then Shipleys will do the dirty work for them.
I would urge you to make contact with RL if you have not done so already.
They are clearly aware of the fraud. However, you appear to have the missing piece of the jigsaw.
As for Fatchett – he is acting for his clients. Lawyers do that and rarely does it please the non clients !
Ralph,
You suggest you have worked with RL. In that case, they will know who you are.
As for the number they represent, my understanding is that they have “enough” to force the issue. That’s all they need in reality.
I like many have just sat back and watched this play out. I have not chosen which side etc. I suspect I am like many people. If so, then the majority are drifting along.
That is not a mandate.
@John Simpson
Ralph cannot garner support without declaring who they are.
Name me a solicitor that is not duplicitous ? its there job!
Even better name me someone better qualified to take on Harlequin
All the people who have been wronged by The Ames Family need to pull together, now that would be a long list…..sounds like a plan?
Dear Mr. Whitaker, we are aware of the Stat Demands. We have suggested that some of the stat demands be enforced in for example the BVI and not in SVG.
Mr. Lars will agree about the political influence that would be brought to bear in St. Vincent in order to delay proceedings as they pertain to stat demands.
We agree with you that there are a number of pieces of the jigsaw that are missing. We have most but not all those pieces.
There is an awful lot going on in the background.
Ralph,
How could you attack the BVI? All the companies are in SVG ?
Never heard of inter company debts ? Best way is through the Dominican Republic .
Ralph, you are pissing me off, if you can spill the beans fine, but stop F****ing about. – who else could you work with than RL – or are you just yanking our chain, do something of F **k Off
Ralph, moron you are full of shit, getting off on all this – you have no idea of wats actually happning just being a tit
WTF many have discussed for years on this and other forums the business ethics of Harlequin. Whilst Regulatory Legal have been the most public in their involvement with Harlequin it appears that they too have hit the proverbial wall.
It would be wrong to state that Ralph or anyone else could only work with RL.
Forgive me for asking but what have RL achieved in the last 6 months?
Are there no other players in this, perhaps there are but perhaps they are working quietly behind the scenes.
@John Simpson
RL have made a huge amount of redress claims against advisers / agents.
They have also put Ames in a corner with their Statutory Demands and actions.
They have offer Ames the chance to come up with a solution. He does not appear to be able to do so.
Hence, the RL change of approach.
Can hardly blame them, as dealing with Ames must be very frustrating.
@WTF
Thank the lord you have returned.
We did think you were Ralph for a bit.
Erica
The investors need to get together to oust the Ames family. Ames stated at the investor meetings that he would look to start interest payments again in August. This date has now passed and so he has failed to deliver yet again. He also stated that he would step aside if the investors didn’t want him at the helm. Well, apart from the obvious one or two investors, I can’t think of anyone else who wants him involved still.
If only we could find the list of investors !
I am aware certain people have a copy, Ralph.
Ames needs a real good shafting, the next few weeks he will be supporting the terrible allegations made by the nasty SPO and insolvency service about his beloved number 1 son.
No doubt suing them too
No R.Legal have not made claims they passed them on to Pannones.
Reg Legal have not actioned stat demands but they have tried to get a solution with the vertically challenged one .
That’s not correct Mr Hanney, only ones where a conflict of interest TailorMade for example ……
@Richard Hannay
Your wrong there. They have hundreds of Stat Demands done and issued.
Pannone are part of their Risk Warning service. They work as a panel.
This site is funny as the basic facts are so often simply wrong !
Lets hope you are wrong Mr W for a lot of reasons which Gareth can clarify.
Could Ralph be fed information from Harlequins legal team 😉
Think about it?
The next couple of weeks will be demanding on Diddy Dave. What a shame such a nice family of con merchants.
I see the Whatstbefuss imposter is back posting abuse in my name.
If you are going to be abusive on here can you please post in your own name rather than hide behind my name.
I very rarely post now – posting in my name only makes me wonder if there only really is a couple of Harlequin supporters posting in multiple names?
Mr. Whitaker. The issuing of a stat demand is a very simple and inexpensive process. In the UK for example you do not even need to be a solicitor to issue one.
It is true to state that RL issued a number of stat demands on behalf of their clients BUT RL did not follow through on them and given the passage of time since the issuance of the original stat demands, under St. Vincent Law (90 days being the norm) the process will now have to be restarted.
Once a stat demand is filed the other party has 21 days to respond. If the other party fails to settle the debt or make an offer of repayment within the 21 days the filing party can begin the legal process of recovering the debt.
This can in itself be fraught with dangers. The filing party must ensure that they have a rock solid case before initiating legal action.
In the case of Harlequin a purchaser might claim they are owed 100,000 but Harlequin will state that they might only be owed 60,000 after mortgage interest payments have been removed.
The Harlequin contracts are so poorly drafted or more importantly drafted in such way as to give an unfair advantage to Harlequin.
The stat demand could easily fail on a technicality and the costs of the action would then have to be borne by the claimant.
There are huge issues with the Harlequin contracts and we believe having taken independent legal advice on the matter that circa 50% of the contracts are invalid.
We are not in a position to make further comments regarding the validity of the contracts at this stage as we are in the process of getting further legal opinion on that matter.
As of yet RL have not enforced any statutory demands against any of the Harlequin companies.
@Ralph
You are clearly missing a piece of the jigsaw. How do you know the stat demands haven’t been actioned ?
The more I hear, the more I am concluding you are one step removed from Harlequin / RL or any other grouping.
Your conclusion with Ames is correct. He is a con man.
However, your assumption of inaction is wrong. Completely.
LLSMITB
Leaky how very astute of you. Yes some of the information we have comes directly from Harlequin’s without prejudiced in house legal team.
And it is very interesting indeed.
The in house legal team confirmed in the past to purchasers that Harlequin had the funds in place to complete the resorts.
We know we have the email.
@Ralph
You are entirely wrong to assume no follow on action has been taken.
You cannot be that close to Dave or his information sources if you do not know the basic issues.
Maybe its time that Mr. Fatchett answers that particular question. RL have not enforced a stat demand against any of the Harlequin companies, and in addition no court records exist to demonstrate such.
If Mr. Fatchett has settled with Harlequin and received “Full” reimbursements for his clients in out of court settlements on the back of the issuance of a Stat demand then that might be so, but given that any such deal would in all likelihood covered by a confidentiality agreement none of us will ever know.
But again no legal enforcement of a stat demand has taken place.
It must also be pointed out that this website is anonymous as are most of those who post comments. Some even choose to copy genuine anonymous posters in a bid to cause confusion.
Given the anonymity of this site it is odd of posters to suggest that other posters are not in command of the full facts.
We could after all be Simon Terry, Dave Ames, Jeremy Newman, Martin Mac Donald or Garreth Fatchett.
No one knows who any one is on this site, therefore no one can state with certainty that some else is wrong or indeed right or not in possession of the full facts.
If Fatchett had got a red cent he would have shouted it from the rooftops . The man can’t hold his own piss
Ralph…surely confirming where some of your information has/is coming from aint the best way to ensure that you continue to obtain what would on the surface be very damaging material against DA/HP
@relax lol sadly for Harlequin and their in house legal team, the information keeps flowing and it will be impossible for Harlequin to stem the flow.
But either way we have most of what we need. There is very little that Harlequin or Simon Terry can do now about it.
We look very much forward to seeing all the skeletons fall out of the closet in the defamation case. A case Ames and Terry will try and delay for as long as is possible. And a case which we firmly believe will never make it to court. Despite what Bob and TS have to say on the matter.
I for one will be so disappointed if the defamation case doesn’t make it to court.
Of course I understand that Ames and Simple Simon will have to make sure it doesn’t get to court as the evidence presented at trial would simply prove their fraudulent operation.
Newman is a smart bloke, so I imagine he could represent himself rather than paying for thieving, sorry, expensive defamation lawyers like Carter Fuck.
However, as said, Ames and Simple Simon will have to settle before trial, so I’ll just have to hang on for Ames on fraud at the Old Bailey. I don’t mean Matt’s trial on the 9th, but the old man’s one to follow.
Will Ma and Pa be at Matt’s trial, shedding proud tears when he gets sent down? “Well dun sun, you dun good and we learnt you proper, we’re prad o’ you sun, you ripped the fuckers off, and blew the lot so nun of ’em can get a penny back, ha ha, poor fuckers! See you on the inside, sun, we can ‘ook up with that mafia bloke, as he’s bound to want to get involved with the award winning Buccament Bay resort”.
It’s fair to say Ralph has been exposed as yet another tosser talking crap!! Why do people mug themselves off by claiming to be insiders when they only get exposed? Ralph just types a load of shit and never backs it up.
I was in the Basildon HQ last week and I bet none of you can tell me where the lawyers offices are.
Come on insiders, don’t let me down!
@Anon RU “Newman is a smart bloke” Yeah right, implicated in the Irish court case, out of a job, big defamation case coming up. Represent himself? he will have to he has no money. He cannot afford lawyers fees.
Ralph Wiggins.
Something about the Ralph’s does not sit right, not sure what, yet.
When you cut through all the obsessive posting, it’s actually mostly ‘hot air’
The constant attacks on RL are odd, unless they are going to ‘come out’ after whipping all 10 of us up into a frenzy 😉
Then we will go running to them cash in hand, begging for help?????
I think that actually could be the motive?
Ralph comments?
A new phrase has been coined –
“The Mattvent Calendar” – like a Christmas Advent Calendar.
We have loaded it up with 30 presents and will remove one from each door, each day.
DAY 6 – The new Family Teeth
It’s a difficult one to understand. the replacement of teeth with inappropriate spangly white ones. However, in some Essex circles its compulsory.
White Gnashers are de rigueur in Essex.
@ wiggins 10-12 Ely PLace
Ralph doesn’t need your money the collective has money to pay investigators………
We do not attack R L we encourage them to do as they say they will ..
@ Corpulent Matt
Don’t worry everything we do we do for a reason.
And we see Harlequin are rattled. LOL. No man need fear anything but fear it self. (Or fear of the unknown) and it’s the unknown that worries Ames and Terry so much.
Bob, tick tock, tick tock. Bob don’t forget your meeting at 11.00. C’mon now update us all after your meeting.
Is Bob going to see an horologist?
Bob’s Meeting: ipad forum in the loo – subject, bullshit!
ELS…..10-12 Ely PLace
HP solicitors? that’s boring Ralph
See?! Ralph never answers a question. Full of shit.
No that’s Bobfdnrm who never answers a question & is full of shit
@Ralph, well your altered excel spread sheets told us a lot didnt they? Of course the idea was to send them to Fatchett who would get a friendly reporter to publish the info. Guess what, it didnt work. It was spotted by the trade press that they were dodgy and died a death. Thats why you have turned against your bessie mate Garett (lol) Now whats the next revelation you can actually back up with facts. If anyone wondered where their interest payments were, or the proposed rescue proposals or information on developments, well blame Ralph for clogging up HP valuable time for trying to stop the defamation court case going ahead. Now who would want that to happen?
Bob , do you have proof of what you say? If so go for it and let’s move forward.
MacBob…”Tomorrow, tomorrow and tomorrow…..it is a tale told
by an IDIOT, full of sound and fury, signifying NOTHING”
@Anon, patience my boy. The wheels of government agencies grind very slowly.
@RH, ask yourself a question. GF mouthpiece has always been IFAonline. These Excel spread sheets should be a revelation, but nothing has appeared in the press. Why not? GF swallowed these sheets hook line and sinker and I warned him that they were inaccurate, in fact doctored. Perhaps someone should ask Laura Miller or Jon Austen why HP has dropped off their radar.
It’s time operation Black Swan
MacIDIOT : That seems to be the problem….the wheels of government
are grinding way way to slowly to stop a fraudster/thief.
It’s a bloody disgrace, what the Fkuk to they do? Meanwhile he is fleecing people to pay their balances – wrong just plain and simple.
The cretinous Bob Storey returns!
“If anyone wondered where their interest payments were, or the proposed rescue proposals or information on developments, well blame Ralph for clogging up HP valuable time.”
Ralph has been on the scene for around for about three weeks now. Is Bob suggesting that thing’s were going swimmingly until he turned up!
The village idiot Bob Storey is back more stupid than ever.
This is fabulous….there seem to be at least 3 or 4 anonymous
posters at the same time. We’re after you Bob, but who are we?
Get back on the loo and we’ll pull your chain as often as you like.
@Anon 12.57, Ah bless, you missed me.
@Anon, 1.10, “but who are we?” but who cares!
Whilst in France, Bob uncovered a secret plot by the French Tourism Department to destroy Harlequin, since their 6 star Resort at Mosquito Creek in St Vincent has been taking all their business from St Martin in the French West Indies. David Ames has known about this for a while, and will soon be dragging them to Court, as it has prevented him from completion of the resort, paying interest payments to investors, paying returns to property owners, getting his airline off the ground, opening Trader Vic’s etc etc.
Part of their plot apparently has something to do with serving French wine in plastic containers.
Dam them! I might have guessed the bloody ‘cheese eating surrender monkeys’ where behind it!!
‘Ralphs’, could you be maybe a spurned IFA, who has taken this up maybe because your clients have been done over?
😉
KB&BB –that would be poetic justice….but now we need the
real kind of justice
I could not agree more, kick them all out on their fat greedy arses including all the hangers on, legal team, sales (of what team) the whole lot
More than one hippopotamus are called hippopotamai
More than one anonymous are called anonymai
We rejoice in pulling his chain
As the i-pad goes down the drain
And all Bob can do while sitting on the loo
Is waive it one tearful bye-bye
I wonder if Bobfdnm got his tick tock mended?
Bob this week shall be very interesting.
Very interesting indeed for some.
We have not released any thing to the media “YET” and its the “FT Advisor” , “Basildon Echo” ” Daily Mail” and “Guardian” not IFA on line who will be given the story.
We feel that a story linked to the conviction and sentencing of Matt Ames might help concentrate minds.
Bob we are sure Mr. Fatchett would have explained to all and sundry that the sales logs were inaccurate or false as you claim them to be.
Bob it is 16.14 UK Time 13.14 in NewYork 19.14 in Dubai and 23.14 in Hong Kong yet nothing has come of your all will be revealed on Monday.
Go fuck one of Ameless’s Ducks you twat. Lol ha ha
Poor Benefit Bob gets very upset at being called a twat. Run along to Ames, Bob, daddy will make it all better.
Do you tweet, B. Bob?
Bobby –
Bah-da-bah-dah-dah-dah
Monday, Monday, so good to me
Monday mornin’, it was all I hoped it would be….
NOT !!! Come on Bobby, you promised…
Which Monday is it going to be Bob le nob?
@Ralph, well you know how it goes, the information will be along soon. I have that information but I’m not going to share it with you just yet.
Is Bob the one who used to be dyslexic/confused?
Or was that another loser?
@Anon – reasons unknown 3:25 pm….”Do you tweet, B. Bob?”
I couldn’t say for definite if he tweets, but I bet once the SFO do take action he’ll sing like a canary!
No offence FDNRM, I couldn’t resit it 🙂
Bob have you heard the latest? Did not think so.
Rescue Plan in tatters.
New Defamation actions to commence.
Clients to consider taking action against Fatchett.
And this is just the tip of the Ice Berg.
Fatchett has been fed a whole load of bull by Simon Terry and Ames. They have led him down a garden path and events this week and over the coming weeks will demonstrate how nieve Fatchett has been.
Ironically it could be good news for some of Fatchett”s clients. They may very well have a cause of action against him.
The Ames family and Terry will be having sleepless nights from here on in.
All will become apparent over the next coming weeks. And Investors are the ones who loose.
Bob sadly you won’t loose because of the law as it pertains to you in St. Vincent however the good news is you will loose everything in the defamation action that will be taken against you because we will be underwriting that action.
@Ralph
You have not offered anything else other than the sales ledger from 2008.
You do not have the full picture. If you did then you would report one specific set of facts. These have not been mentioned.
Therefore, you are missing the most dangerous piece of the jigsaw for Ames.
I am pleased you are providing balance. However, for now, you are not offering that much more than FDNRM (which is the gold standard for nothingness).
Whilst I respect GF may have been trying to make the best of a diabolical situation for more than one of his clients, I would have been miffed if I was a client and was forced to take action collectively with other clients whilst the Harlequin empire was burning.
I would have wanted a solicitor to act for me and go at Harlequin and Simple Simon like a rottweiler to make sure I got my money back fast. Too late now though, nothing left; except maybe for those with completed units, but I doubt any paper trail would make it clear who those investors are. And I doubt the number of completed units will equal the investors who think they have completed units.
I think Gareth had nothing but good intentions, but I think he was misguided in thinking he could help hundreds of people when the fraudulent operation was on its knees. Understandable that he fell for Ames’ and Terry’s bullshit. People have been falling for it, and in it, for years.
On the issue of completed units; another complexity will be that investors in other resorts can likely prove their monies have been used for the development of Buccament Bay, so they must surely have a charge over it according to SVG law?
@Ralph, best laugh I have had all day. A defamation case against me funded by you. I think you are going to be exposed well before that comes about.
@ ARU
RL works on class actions on a “no win no fee” basis, don’t they – although they take some sort of minimal deposit up-front. That means you are always going to be in a group of clients, not an individual. The benefit, of course, is that your expenditure on fees is minimized.
If a client wants their own lawyer and a bigger fee bill, that is their choice.
@Anon – reasons unknown you sort of get a bit mixed up, how can he get money if there is none to have?
Crozier gets slagged off for charging £7k Reg Legal for no win no fee?
What do you want it free?
This is called no win no fee – moan
Pay up front moan – moan
Idiot, just like Ralph, full of crap
@Ralph
So we have nasty Reg Legal bashing Ralph today.
Ralph as the days go on I am getting bored with you, all you come out with is general statements of well, F***K All.
You and FDNRM should get a room and bore each other to death.
What good is a dubious 2008 or 2009 excel spreadsheet- such a cock.
@Ralph, how come you haven’t fed some of your revelations to Crozier? She seems to have slipped off your radar.
SGD, so this is like a conditional no-win-no-fee deal? So it’s only those clients that can’t afford to go for a breech of contract or fraud claim as an individual that he is representing, and all his clients are aware of that? I hadn’t realised that as I haven’t read it anywhere. Fair enough then if all clients knew they were waiting for GF to strike up some sort of relaunch deal instead of a straight forward claim and enforcement with a court order.
A Pity – absolutely no idea what point you’re trying to make.
@ Anon – reasons unknown – bunch of moaning Tw*ts never happy.
@ FDNRM Crozier is involved = no nasty comments? and the Hippo
@ap….HP I wouldn’t be in the slightest surprised. Oh and a big thank you to Private Dick for giving me number for Nuneaton police station. Saved me a lot of time.
We have had no update from Harlequin recently. So we have taken it upon ourselves to give you an update as seen through the eyes of Dave and Carol Ames.
Dear Investors and Agents,
We have yet more great news to tell you.
Tailormade Sipp have told us that we can continue to sell SIPPs. They have suggested to augment cash flows we should consider selling Carbon Credits. ( Sorry it was my wife Carol who told Tailormade that the FCA is allowing us sell SIPPS again soon.)
Pat Cash has promised to remain celibate on his future visits to Buccament Bay. Thanks to some former security staff for that little gem.
We are looking to take over Gary Player. Yes a few years back they were in trouble and we threw their man Ken Contanzo a few 100 grand. We did. That’s how we got the Black Knight. No need for due diligence you just need to know who’s palm to grease. Ken disappeared shortly after.
There have been rumours about bribes paid in the Dominican Republic to planning and environmental officials for the planning permissions for our resort known as the Hideaway. We can confirm that a bribe was probably paid but as we explained in our letter to the BBC Panorama on that issue it was Martin Mac Donald who paid that bribe.
There was no money ever paid by me or my wife to the PM of St. Vincent. We have had a few issues wrongly attributed to us in St. Vincent. Our General Manager Mr. Mark Sawkins was laundering some 1,000,000 at a time through his personal bank account in Scotia Bank in St. Vincent. The bank warned Mr. Sawkins to stop but he did not. When we found out we terminated his employment.
My trusted security manager Cliff Jones was asked by me to carry a bag of cash to the bank. Just some 1,000,000 in change. There was a hole in the bag and the money fell out on the way and was lost. Mr. Jones was sacked and this resulted in the rumour that the PM had received a bribe. But all it was, was some loose change we lost.
We have since forgiven Mr. Jones and he now works for us on a part time basis.
We have had little reason to bribe people or forge documents in the recent past. This has had a positive affect on our cash flows. As you all are aware it is because of the forged documents that we were able to win the Irish case. These forgeries only cost you the investor 500,000 so we believe it was money well spent.
We knew the Irish Court case was a slam dunk so we took the assets of ICE Group in the Caribbean some 20 million worth and sold/gave them to creditors we owed money to including Kelly Glass. Any cash left over we used to pay the salaries of our staff in St. Vincent thus saving you the investor money.
We destroyed the Irish builder and have bankrupted him, so investors need not worry about him kicking up a stink about us stealing his assets. Anyway he stole our money so we are just claiming it back for you with interest.
Investors should not be concerned about the SFO any more because we proved in Ireland that O Halloran, Newman and MacDonald are fraudsters. If there was a criminal case our defence team would tear apart the prosecution.
Investors should also not be concerned about the authorities finding any incriminating documents in our office. David Geddes is family and also the custodian of our servers, yes we have more then one. David has a back up system at home.
And our financial information is safe. Neither Wilkins Kennedy or BDO have what our Sarah Tricker has. Sarah trusts no one so keeps all our financial information at home.
There has been much speculation about the defamation case. We can state that the case is going ahead. Our Legal team ELS was wrong to try and strike a deal with Wilkins Kennedy et al. We gave them no such instruction. We will, once we receive another 10 completions be in a position to fund this case. And both my Wife and I can state categorically that taking on this case will be worth it.
We are also proceeding in taking an action against Andrew Smith of procure it direct. As you all know we trusted him dearly and he still stole 1,000,000 of your money from you.
Mercifully David Campion and Andrew Newman told us about Andy Smith and we were able to nip this theft in the bud.
Sean Ghent discovered that Smith was importing cocaine onto St. Vincent using the barge that brought in the white sand for the beach. We knew absolutely nothing about this. Had we known we would have demanded that Smith plough some of the profits back into the resort.
(To be continued)
My algorithm failed me. I always thought that one of the Ralph team
was connected to PID.
Bob if you know who we are tell everyone. We are in the process of taking action on the many matters we have raised.
We are rottweilers. The Ames family need to be prevented from taking any more victims money and we are using every legal means possible to ensure that this happens.
As we have completed our various multi jurisdictional actions or as documents become available we will publish them.
We have just received some UK court documents which we will be uploading this week.
Some will find these of interest.
didn’t someone point out the police station was just round the corner from your house?
Want a little bet how Matt will plea?
Guilty mi lord……
Cfywooapb no
Stop sniffing the buccament sand and admit your fucked bob
Is cfywooapb Welsh?
Couldn’t Find Your Way Out Of A Paper Bag = cfywooapb Easy.
@ The collective Ralph, not by you I’m not.
PRESS RELEASE
The collective announces that Padraig OHalloran has lodged a appeal through the Irish courts.
More on this breaking news shortly
now there’s a surprise! [not]
Bob – I find your response to me post at 8:05 petulant.
You have no sense of the absurd – but then that is what
you are. ABSURD all in caps
MY post, not ME post.
If he can have one last ride on his buggy, the plea GUILTY
Matt wants a discount, for coping a plea
Bobby Bobits Bobbies Helmet – say that after a few!
Good news, RL tweet, network sales director of Harlequin confirms completions at Buccament Bay – back in 2012!!!!
Alas, its been confirmed its an untrue statement.
Another lie…………….
Its not going to be a good week for the Amesless family……..
Oh dear, does that mean all those millions won’t be paid back so Uncle Dave can’t make those long awaited interest payments?
Yes, it’s all Ralph’s fault isn’t it Bob? Everything was fine until he came along.
Fatchett told investors that the good news was that there was no appeal in the Irish case. He tweeted this on the day the judgement was given.
Now he tweets that there are rumours that there is an appeal.
Fatchett I think you need to call your mate Simon Terry because it appears he has been yanking your chain and your clients chains.
We have also been told that there is an appeal and counter claim.
Bob tell us this is rubbish. For your sake we hope its untrue. Well we don’t really because if the appeal is upheld we are looking forward to seeing you sued six ways till Sunday.
Looks like someone’s helping FDNRM with his spellings and grammar tonight.
@Ralph yeah yeah yeah. Sue me? Get real. Ralph and post some facts for a change not corrupted excel sheets.
Bob – no one is going to sue you.
Ralph – why even suggest it.
The Irish Appeal is the beginning of the end.
Ames has no time and no silver linings anymore.
Who at Harlequin will tell him it’s over …
I hate Bobby’s guts. But can you sue someone for being stupid?
And I mean really stupid.
This from a TripAdvisor review posted 30 August 2013 by Will G who stayed at Buccament Bay Aug 2013.
“A couple of notes. Senior Management please look after your staff as they are looking after the guests. Shouting at your staff in public is unprofessional and not the way people need to be motivated. Secondly, the senior staff children need to be aware that the people on the resort are guests of the resort and the resort is not their personal playground to tell people what they can and can’t do…”
Who is Will G referring to? Surely not General Manager Matt Ames and his children?
Panic has already set in in Basildon and Bluebell Wood. Sadly the next few weeks are only going to get progressively worse.
A number of big hitting legal firms about to enter the fray, representing ICE Group, Cellate Caribbean, Newman, O’ Halloran Mac Donald and Wilkins Kennedy.
None of whom represent purchasers, all of whom are representing their clients in current litigation.
These boys are prepared for the fight ahead.
There is a huge amount of money at stake and reputations, reputations that Ames and his family tried to destroy. Ames called the Irish case a little prematurely.
Was the vitriolic nature of Harlequin’s statements purely a demonstration as to their fears knowing their victory was merely pyrrhic and short lived in nature.
This was not an action as in that taken against the singing pig.
Bob and Co attacked and mocked the financial status of those embroiled in the litigation with Harlequin. It seems now that some very deep pockets are being made available to fund these actions.
An appeal of this nature in the Irish Supreme Court cost < 1,000,000 for each side.
Harlequin have already spent well in excess of 5,000,000 in chasing 1,500,000.
The defamation case will cost the loosing party multiples of millions in costs.
And then there are the counter claims. All this happening in front of investors eyes. The game of Russian Roulette being played by Dave Ames and Carol Ames and Simon Terry with investor money.
Terry and Ames were too embroiled in trying to destroy the reputations of those they were suing. In trying to run them out of cash in order to win by default.
They were more interested in bankrupting their foes rather than hoping to gain financial compensation. They did not care it was not their money.
Carol, Dave and Dan Ames are suing Newman, Mac Donald and Wilkins Kennedy personally in the defamation case. The Ames's personal assets are frozen. Where do investors think the money came from to fight this action.
Newman tried to warn investors that they would loose their money. That there were no permissions, that property was sold on land not owned, etc etc etc. Ironically Ames used investors money to try and shut him up.
Ames played God. He surrounded himself with second rate stars, Pat Cash, Townsend, what are the lawyers in Liverpool football club doing?
Just look at the HIG site. In excess of a thousand people looking for their money. No one getting their monthly interest payments. 6 months of talking about a rescue.
But go to the Buccament Bay Resort website, all is perfect in paradise.
BOLLOX.
And who ultimately looses. The investors do. The investors have. And what did Fatchett do? Buy Ames 6 more months.
Bob what’s your views on the appeal. Bob is not an idiot, Bob is a freak. Bob is Ames’s mouth piece. Tick tock tick tock you freak lol.
The sheets are real Bob as is everything else that will bring your bessie mate down.
BB’s monthly “advertising” check to the TripAdvisor parent company must
have bounced. (Bob – I am American and check is spelled the
way I was taught)
Bob where is TS and how come you don’t call us Newman any more?
And views on the appeal Bob? Any comment? You have been right about everything else?
So appeal?
@ EE2
The children you mention, certain words spring to mind, precocious, spoiled brats – they have been heard saying Daddy and Granddaddy own the island – they give children a bad name.
Not the kids fault, what chance do they have?
TS will be coming over to the UK, big day on Monday
A new phrase has been coined –
“The Mattvent Calendar” – like a Christmas Advent Calendar.
We have loaded it up with 30 presents and will remove one from each door, each day.
DAY 7 – The Guilty (not Guilty plea)
This is all down to genetics.
The Guilty (not Guilty plea) actually means I will plead guilty because I want the 33% reduction in sentencing.
However, Mummy and Daddy will keep blaming the ‘Irish Court case’ and that I am 100% innocent and It’s all Newmans fault etc etc boring boring
@FDNRM
You could have been correct, ‘The fatty Broughton’ just popped up on the RL site advertising Crozier
So predictable.
Lets see what Ralph has to say about Erica/Crozier. Well Ralph are you pro or anti the Wigan bunker? This should be interesting.
Boring and predictable …. Lets get back to facts we can deal with
There is an appeal so no money from Eire , so no interest payments again!
There is no news from SEven capital – so no sign of an investment from STay well group.
Occupancy down its the bad season
Reported sale of furnishings and equipment
G.F claims of double selling
G.F claims of fraud in Brazil
Failure of the HIG to get anywhere close to the truth and your concerned that Mrs BRoughton comments on the Reg LEgal forum
Are you all totally fucking brain dead? Wake up the liquidation and the end game is here.
RL announces Brazil meetings . He. Is upping the ante finally
@Ralph, and your comment about Erica/Crozier? How defensive of you. How predictable of you.
Bob you are truly a bizarre human being. Have you ever heard the saying Nero fiddled whilst Rome burned.
For some very strange reason you now appear to be directing attention to Mrs. Broughton and away from Mr. Newman.
Anyway to answer your question, we are not sure what you mean by the Wigan Bunker. You appear to suggest that this is some kind of war.
We understand that Mrs. Broughton or Mr. Broughton is an investor like the other 4999 investors out there and we further understand that all they want is their money back because of Harlequin’s in ability to honour the contract between them and the Broughtons.
Mrs. Broughton has been more vociferous then many about this. We applaud the stance she has taken. She is after all fighting for her money which you have directly benefited from.
Now you’re only interest in this is to try and seek some link between us and Mrs. Broughton in an effort to allow Ames and Simon Terry or indeed anyone associated with Harlequin to coerce or worse intimidate/ bully or blackmail / bribe Mrs. Broughton or indeed anyone else who you or Harlequin might suspect of talking to us or anyone seeking to have the Ames family brought to account for their actions.
We suggest you desist from your childish ways in the full knowledge that you will continue to make an ass of your self on this forum.
You seem to enjoy and relish in bullying women especially on line. That is a very sad and sick trait. We are sure you would not accept that behaviour if it came to your wife. Then again you could be the type of individual who gets off on domestic violence.
Harlequin are in serious trouble but it seems that you and your masters are more fixated in discovering who we are. Bob shut up you fool and let people try and find solutions and hope out of the burning wreck that is Harlequin.
As many out there might be aware Harlequin Ames and Terry have warned various purchasers that if they should engage with any one anti Harlequin they will never get their money back. And Ames and Terry use the likes of Storey to do their bidding.
Your no better then an on line predator Bob and your Bessie mate Ames and his family are pure thieving scum.
Oh just go and fuck yourself your boring everyone now . Facts are facts not a defence . Why are you so short of facts and so full of defence?
Monday came and went and frig all happened you are full of shit bobby .
Bob you directed a question at us Ralph. The collective Ralph posted a comment and you responded as if they were Ralph. You idiot. We are Ralph, They are “The collective Ralph” and you are just a puppet. And scum.
Don’t forget Ralph that Newman, O ‘Halloran, MacDonald have benefited from my investment. Got any court transcripts you want to share with the wider public? Usual approach isn’t it Ralph, don’t answer the questions, just bully the questioner.
Maybe bob doesn’t get much leg over at home. hence he gets a good bum fuck of Ames And he loves it
@FDNRM, I think the time has come my friend when you need to desist with the constant defence of HP. You have put in a good shift and made some very valid points at times, but the bigger picture is clear to all and you’re not fooling anyone anymore. If you have anything to tell people that can give them hope then that would be fantastic, but the continuous statements about who did what to HP and why others are to blame is just becoming one big noise. I could write you a list of what is wrong with HP that you could not in any honesty defend, but it’s been done a hundred times and you don’t seem to be able to see the woods for the trees. I really think it’s time to wave the white flag.
Hannay, you do seem to have an obsession with me. How sad are you making comments about me.
@Sid, your comments are interesting. I don’t think iv gone out of my way to defend anyone recently. However the arse holes on here who take delight in attacking me and my family will not drive me off here. Neman, O’Halloran and MacDonald have been accused of robbing mine and other investors money. I don’t think that is acceptable do you?
Bob Storey is obsessed with himself. He cares only about his personal investment and sod the rest of you.
FDNRM: Keep going Bobbykins: Your such a Cad! The derision of you is well worth the occassional visit to this site. You are one seriously sad and lonely person. Come out of the Loo Bobbykins, throw away your little machine. (Virtual reality is just that – A real world actually exists outside your little homely but cramped environment). You never know even the Frau might take pity on you. LOL, Ho, Ho, Ho, etc etc.
Ralphs defence of Crozier and Broughton is obvious like the rubbishing of Fatchips – I don’t know why they attack one not the other?
Crozier has a long way to go just like Fatchips!
@ Paul Walton
Did Simon Terry come back to you regarding him personally checking the file for double selling? I very much doubt it.
FDNRM, to answer your question, no I don’t find it acceptable in the same way that I don’t find HP’s actions acceptable. It seems to me that the whole organisation is nothing more than a vehicle to obtain huge amounts of cash from investors without feeling obligated to give anything back. The question is whether it started out as that type of operation or whether it evolved that way. A lot of people are suffering at the hands of HP who have acknowledged this and promised to communicate and be transparent, yet they let people sit and fester without giving them anything positive to hang on to – which can only mean there is no good news or hope. I honestly don’t believe that you are part of any scam or cover up and admire your loyalty to a company/family that you believe in, but to simply dismiss all of the negative news that is there for all to see is very ignorant. Not that I’m calling you ignorant, but that is ignorant behaviour. Just for the record, I also don’t think it was acceptable for your family’s details to be posted on here as that’s just inviting trouble and is going too far.
@ Sid, a very mature measured reply unlike Ralph who seems to have stiffy on for some people
You may want to antiquate your self with this;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proceeds_of_Crime_Act_2002
Thank you DB. I think we must be nearing a time when all the he-said-she-said stuff has to stop. I think it will probably burn itself soon and will have gotten us nowhere.
We agree Sid excellent response. We would just like to point out to Bob that the appeal could mean that O’ Halloran and McDonald did nothing wrong. The clock has been reset on the Irish case and as such all bets are off.
And Bobs attacks on Newman are ill founded. Sadly Sid Bob is no innocent victim in this debacle.
@Ralph, perhaps WK will give Newman his job back then. Obviously from your post above then the appeal will not clear Newman as “it could only mean that O’Halloran and MacDonald did nothing wrong”
@Sid, unfortunately your thoughts on personal attacks stopping has been proved pointless as Ralph’s rider still states an opinion he cannot back up.
It will be appeal after appeal after appeal. It’s all just a game and the only winners will be the lawyers. And all for what, £1.5m? If the future of HP really does balance on this money coming in then it really is over already. I wouldn’t be surprised if Ames is pleased with the appeal as it will buy him another 6-12 months worth of excuses.
I think Fatchett should exercise the SD’s he has in place and wind the whole thing up. The writing’s been on the wall for a long time and we have seen time and again that any rescue plan is futile. If there really was a serious chance of rescue, wouldn’t we know more about it by now? What would be the benefit in keeping good news from everyone at this stage?….in case we start feeling more positive about the future and back off for a while?! I seriously think Fatchett should put himself on the front foot and not let Ames lead the way.
Sid / Ralphs/ Bobit
Its time to bring this whole sorry mess to a close, its finished. I do find Bobit a bloody pain, but he is consistent and appears not to lie.
Ralf, you are just a bitter and twisted nasty fucker with very little info and some horrible nasty little plan.
Hi Aphp, I completely agree. I think we’ve all been patient enough and it’s time to pull the plug. If Fatchett really does have active SD’s in place then he should act on them. We need to accept that we have all lost out, take the hit and move on.
Sid there are no stat demands. They expired. Bob we will refrain from attacking you should you wish to enter a reasoned sensible debate on the issues affecting investors.
@Proceed of crime act 2002
Well, that swanky house of Fat Matt’s should go, he maybe left with a golf buggy need it when he gets out 😉
Agreed its time to say goodbye ….. Good bye to my money, my investment in SVG . And goodbye to Ames . Ford is a decent nick lets hope they have room for you and little Mattie Boy.
@ A Pity, We have a huge amount of intelligence on Ames. We can be nasty bastards when it suits. You need to be nasty when it comes to Ames and Terry. We are sorry we can’t let you in on the tactics. The negotiations and talk have got investors no where. Calling on GF to enforce stat demands is all well and good. Sitting on here talking about what others should do is basically futile.
Its akin to being an armchair pundit. We have troops on the ground so to speak and we are reporting from the front lines.
Some may not like or approve our tactical approach. But this is the way we are fighting this.
If others have a different approach which will work please tell us.
Fat Matt will plead guilty 100%
You don’t want to cross the old Duke of Kent, he could make any number of phone calls to his ‘errrm’ connections.
You have no idea what it would be like to cross someone in that position really you don’t
Hi Ralph, if that’s true then Fatchett really does have a problem as I know that he has clients who think they have the power to take Ames down at will. And the only reason the think this is because RL told them they did. It sounds to me that Ames kept Fatchett talking just long enough for the SD’s to expire. Whether that was deliberate or not, it has certainly helped Ames and stiffed Fatchett. But how can you be so certain Ralph? What makes your information so reliable?
So what kind of sentence does Matt face if found guilty?
Three years tops on the deal he has done.
3 years! But he hasn’t done anything wrong. It was everyone else that did it!
If/when he is inside, will he still have to stand trial as a HP director if/when they are prosecuted?
The stat demands have an expiry date (90 days) but that is an irrelevance. Ames needed to buy time. So he and Terry entered into “Goodfaith” negotiations with GF. Ames hoped that he would have obtained a positive outcome in the Irish case. Indeed it appeared he did. But what was rather odd at the time was the vitriolic nature and exuberance demonstrated by Ames despite the award being so small in the overall context of the sums being sought.
In addition Ames and Terry made statements of fact as they pertained to the appeal. Basically stating that there was to be no appeal.
We can only guess as to why Terry and Ames made those statements but it would be difficult for Ames to obtain the 3rd Party Funding with litigation outstanding. It must be noted that the counter claim by the ICE Group against Harlequin in the Caribbean is huge, in the tens of millions of pounds.
We believe the appeal in the Irish case has killed off any hope of a rescue. We believe that GF was taken by surprise by the announcement of the appeal.
Harlequin apparently told GF there was to be no appeal.
If GF was to re-issue and enforce the stat demands this would trigger the collapse of Harlequin. To be fair to GF he would need to use the stat demands only as a weapon of last resort.
Sadly the appeal and its consequences have dealt a mortal blow to Harlequin.
And with it any hopes of a viable rescue plan.
There is however a solution to all this. If there was an agreement by all parties involved in the litigation to step back from the abyss. Agree to settle matters probably by all sides agreeing to bear their own costs and to walk away, then yes any serious impediment to a rescue plan might be removed.
The Ames family would also have to agree to step aside.
This would help investors.
@Ralph,
You may want to read over your legal books again, all it not at it seems. Have faith.
Ralph I think you are wrong there is only one way this is going to end and it is not going to be good,more to the point why would everyone agree to both of them walking away scott free
Ames and ohallaran deserve each other and the rest of us deserve better than Gareth Fatchet and co.Ralph you are loosing your perception
Thanks for that Ralph. Inciteful as ever. The question is though, should RL have taken money from it’s clients to raise SD’s if they weren’t going to be acted upon? What’s the point of that? Isn’t that a waste of time and just misleading people? Can Fatchett be held to account for that?
One of my many ‘contacts’ have give me a little bit of an insight into the Ames family life.
Did you know that Daddy Ames had the option to stop little Fatty Matty going to jail? 😉
Oh yes indeed, he was given an option to chuck a million quid back into the company; the liquidators would have said ”Fair play Fatty accounting is not your best subject” and we will leave you alone.
Nasty Daddy Ames said, ‘ Fuck off see you in court” He then went off and purchased a couple of past it planes.
So he stiffed his son, when he could have saved him with our money.
@ Ralph,
More like 7 if he does not plead, and 4-5 years if he says guilty.
Ralph, please read your books 😉
Proceeds of Crime 2002 – ouch!
Even Ames is aware the cracks are starting to appear now.
Brazil
Double selling
No completions (ever)
No finance
Negative Social media
Investors getting ‘Braver’
Matt’s court trial
Freezing orders
Low occupancy BB
Seven Capital DD
Forthcoming investor meetings????
Dave it’s game over time to give up, your done.
@Ralph 1.50 we can enter sensible disscutions if you:
Post your name, address, tel no, details of any purchase you may have, e mail address, mobile tel number. Your wife’s name, your mothers name. Until you have done that you don’t even know the earning of the expression nasty bastard.
@ralph 3.35, so a solution to you would be for both sides to walk away. Like drop the defamation case for instance? You Ralphy are so obvious, and because of that I believe DA will never back off from you.
Now the truth Ralph, you see yourself as the decisive leader, you TW4T, that’s what all this is about.
Come running in and save the day, Fkucking Tw4t
Scum.
@TS, Ralph’s game plan is finally out in the open. How surprising that Newman and O’Halloran are finally being championed as the white knights riding to the rescue. Only if all actions are called off of course. Crawl back under your rock Ralph.
@TS We did not say that we were interested in being put forward as candidates. We suggested hypothetical solutions.
Maybe TS you might be a potential candidate. You certainly demonstrate your ability in the use of the English language to express yourself lol.
What would you do TS to resolve the situation?
Ahh Bob, Bob, Bob, we are not Newman, MacDonald or Wilkins Kennedy. But Bob Mr. Ames is desperately trying to avoid the defamation case. It will never happen. Never.
Bob cmon its Wednesday tomorrow. Please tell the world who we really are. Tock tick Tock tick.
And we said before there is more then one Ralph on here.
Bob you really are a sad little man.
We are perfectly happy with our SD’s thank you very much.
@Gareth Fatchet
Are they still valid?
what next?
when are the meetings?
when are you going to get the answers to the questions?
(TS) Dumb and (Bob) Dumber. Mr. Ames does not want a defamation case. But who cares.
What people want to see is a solution to the problem. Have you guys a solution?
Do you both believe that Mr. Ames is the person to lead the charge?
Does he have the support of the majority of the investors?
All in all good time Ralph, you know how these things work.
Anon, Bob made a report to the police on an anonymous call he received. He has stated for weeks now that he will make the identity of those who made that call public.
Bob is a bully, enjoys picking on women, possibly a predator, could even be a wife beater. He is an ardent fan of Ames. TS is employed by Harlequin. Between them they are representative of the company who 5000 investors paid money to and are now looking for answers. Bob Storey is also the gentleman who stated publicly that the Serious Fraud Office imparted information to him pertaining to the criminal investigation being conducted into the activities of Harlequin.
He has stated on numerous occasions that we are various different individuals, including Newman, MacDonald, Broughton, Crozier, Wilkins Kennedy etc. He has no proof of this yet has no compulsion in stating this to be fact.
He is an odd ball but is Ames’s on line mouthpiece.
BTW Gareth Fatchet (is that with 1 T or 2? )
If you are the Irish builder or Newman, or whoever, one is a convicted fraudster, one an odd ball. Newman worked for Ames and now is stuffing him ( bad trait)
I would not be surprised if you teamed up with the fatty B, you will very quickly understand that is a big mistake. Putting all that aside you are a nasty bastard.
FDNRN is odd, irritating – but to post his details, etc was wrong, nasty, vindictive and low.
Then suddenly touting yourself as a F***king Hero, F**k off. I would rather take my chance with Crozier or Fatchet.
Low life bottom feeding scum, you want to close down HP so you don’t go to court plain and simple
TS the Irish case was a civil case so therefore Mr. O Halloran was not convicted nor has he a conviction.
Mr. Newman is an odd ball. Ok we will take your for that. Is that criminal?
Who posted Bob’s details? Who cares?
TS Dave Ames and his wife are being investigated for criminal fraud.
Their son Matt Ames has pleaded guilty to Fraud and will be sentenced next week hopefully.
Dave Ames has bribed people, he had stolen millions of dollars of assets, sold property on land he never, committed perjury etc etc etc.
HP is already gone TS. Its gone and with it the money of in excess of 5000 investors.
And why? Because of Dave Ames, Carol Ames and the chief protagonist Mr. Simon Terry a disgrace to his profession. A bent lawyer and all three are the scum you speak about.
No updates from Harlequin. No solutions from you or Bob. Just profanity.
You need to be aware that Seven Capital / Stay Well Group deal is about to fall through at the due diligence stage.
One of the solicitors acting for Seven Capital was out at a wine tasting with one of their directors Andy Robinson.
He was boasting at the stupidity of investors and David Ames in believing Seven would not do a last minute swerve.
They will pull out, leaving only liquidation available. Then they will return with an offer to the liquidator.
Seven have already sounded the right people in SVG. As long as it is business as usual, Ames will be dropped.
The winners will be Seven / SWG. Everyone else will lose out.
There will be no court cases as the liquidator will abandon them.
There will be no rescue.
There will be no finance payments.
There will be no need for Ralph or FDNRM anymore.
BB will be the only resort bought. The rest will simply be sold at a fire sale.
You hear it here first.
@Anon 6.31. Stop pretending not to be part of “Ralph” ” you know it and WE know it” dead give away. Nice choice of gutter language BTW.
Ice Ice Baby.
Yes, all true I was there.
I feel all your anger brothers and sisters, you need to turn all this negative energy…………………. and string the little toad faced twat up!
All,
“At Risk” Buccament Bay Clients
1. Clients who contracted with Buccament Bay Resort Limited – 2006 -2009
2. Clients who made Stage Payments.
3. Clients who relied on the representations of agents / HMSSE that a “Guaranteed Mortgage” would be available upon completion.
This set of clients contracted using the first phase of numbers.
They all bought properties from a company which did not and has never owned land in Saint Vincent.
Many paid stage payments. One investor we are aware of paid the full asking price (£200,000+).
Not one single one of these properties have completed.
“At Risk”
If Buccament Bay Resort Limited or the actual land owner Harlequin Property (SVG) Limited collapse then all investors holding contracts with these companies will become unsecured creditors in any liquidation. In simple terms, they will lose their investment.
Many investors paid Stage Payments and some paid the full asking price.
Security
We are going to ask Harlequin Property (SVG) Limited (1) Buccament Bay Resort Limited (2) to voluntarily offer security over the land parcels where Phase 1 investors have made significant stage payments.
The benefit of this is that these investors would be protected against a subsequent liquidation. It would also quash any concerns that a liquidation / buy back scenario is on the agenda.
We are going to suggest this approach to David Ames very shortly and will ask him to agree it in principle by close next week. If David Ames agrees, then he will go a long way to convincing investors that he has their interests at heart.
We are happy to raise the legal costs for our lawyers in SVG to do this work as a priority.
What happens if the idea of security is rejected ?
We hope that this is not the case. However, if David Ames rejects the idea of security across the Buccament Bay land then we will look at alternatives which will achieve the same end.
Phase 1 Investor ?
If you signed between 2006 – 2009 at Buccament Bay please be in contact with either Phil Haslam or Martyn Anderson. 01384 889900.
They will need :-
(a) a copy of your contract
(b) details of the payments you made
(c) whether or not you “resold” your contract
Deadline
We are going to ask David Ames to confirm his position by close next Friday. We feel that he has a very simple decision to make. Buccament Bay is not his. He does, however own 100% of the shares in the companies that do own it.
This is a seminal moment in this debacle. David Ames has the opportunity to do the right thing.
Regulatory Legal Solicitors
Well its the last chance for Ames, if he says no, he must have some nasty little scam going on with Seven Capital.
The big problem is Ames THINKS IT ALL HIS.
I would have plan B started, he is slippery little eel 😉
All,
I will speak on this matter with Mr Ames in the morning. It indeed, would prove we want to do the right time for investors
What is going on here. Is this Fatchett a lawyer? You cannot grant security on a pre existing debt. Any liquidator will over turn this.
What’s alarming is that RL must have been told that liquidators are to be appointed soon.
And Fatchett will be told yeah great idea we will look into it. And Fatchett will wait and wait and wait and all the time Ames will tell Shipleys and the authorities that a deal is in the offing.
And on and on this stupidity continues. And what is Fatchett doing for his existing clients?
Anon, the land has no charges on it. Debt free.
Good idea as Ames has no real choice.
@FDNRM.
I’m not taking the P**S Bob, would this not be a sensible choice for you?
To secure your asset? Or do you actually trust Ames with what I assume are your entire life savings?
It is a very sad day for all. Fatchett is looking for new clients ones he has not got before. He is seeking to protect their interests, fine.
If he is offering an olive branch to Harlequin then he will not enforce the stat demands. If he enforces the stat demands then only those clients in the category above will benefit.
Operation black swan, has commenced
jibblesith
Aye Anon…, I am the all seeing eye – who are you a bloody mind reader 😉
Anon
By offering security on a debt free asset Mr Ames protects the purchasers.
Only a problem if the land has been double or triple sold……..
Seven Capital, The Staywell Group told Fatchett this evening that they were not interested in pursuing a rescue plan.
They told Fatchett that no one will touch this toxic product as it stands. They told Fatchett that they would make an offer to the liquidator.
Fatchett has thrown his toys out of the pram. If he can’t have his rescue no one can.
RL stated last week that Ames had double and triple sold. Also why does Fatchett not ask Ames for the same security in the same manner for clients who purchased on Merricks and St. Lucia and the Dom Rep. Fatchett is panicking.
He is now seriously risking all our investments. He has no plan. Stop now Mr. Fatchett for gods sake.
Anon,
Be serious. Ames has ruined your investment.
Also, phase 1 has people like fdnrm who has paid for his investment. Most people paid 30%. That’s the crucial difference.
Why shouldn’t Fatchett throw his toys? He’s been very patient for a long time and has been let down time and again. Hopefully Fatchett will exercise any SD’s he does have and bring the whole sorry mess to a close sooner rather than later. What’s the alternative, let a 3rd party buy BB for a steal from the liquidators?
Sid, spot on.
The end game has started…
No Mr.Ames did not ruin my investment.
Newmon did. O Halahan did. MacDonald did.
Wilkins Kennedy did. Why is O Halahan allowed appeal his sentence.
They had nothing before they met Mr. Ames.
I have met Mrs. Ames do you know what they did to her family? They threatened her family every week. Mr. Ames put his own wealth into this. Mrs Ames told me he put 50 million of his money into the business.
Mrs. Ames showed me and my husband that 200 investors owe them 60 million.
What have they done wrong? Fatchet has not done anything. Why? Because the Ames have done nothing wrong. Fatchet is protecting the people who owe Ames money.
Newmons father was high up in the police. Mrs Ames showed us that they wanted to pay the investors back in her sons company. The company had problems. Her son paid for a forest in Brazil in South America but the guys were frauds. Mrs. Ames son is going to prison because Newmons father rigged it.
Now Fatchet will ruin everything by protecting the people who owe the Ames money. This is for real.
Anon – If that’s for real I am Bernie Madoff!!!
Anon,
Matt stole the money to pay for fast cars. Dave was going to use investor money to pay his sons debts off. He deserves prison.
Most investors live in hope of a fairy ale ending. there will not be one.
Get over it.
Well done Ralph, you have created panic with you rumors and speculation. Feeding GF false information, spreading inaccurate information. having a good laugh are we? Think I will be making a call tomorrow.
Are you for real Anon? The words hook, line and sinker spring to mind.
In principle yes, people owe him money but he has to give them what they are paying for at the same time! Your comments worry me. It’s no surprise that Ames thinks inventors are a soft touch.
Evening Bob. Panic what panic. We are not RL. We did not write their letter. Jeez Bob you are getting paranoid. We guess you better make that call tomorrow. The one to GF.
Anon, I really think you need to read your post back to yourself to see how silly it sounds. I can’t believe anyone could believe such a ridiculous sob story. It’s desperate.
Bob we are sure that Gareth Fatchett would have checked the veracity of the information we provided if indeed this is what has triggered his latest move.
But Bob we have more, shed loads more information. Your Bessie friend Ames is the one who has caused this mess.
Bob Gareth Fatchett seems to know what he is doing. But make that call. Tick tock tick tock. Soon your little paradise dream with PVC Champagne Glasses and petals on your bed will belong to some one else. Awwwwwww. Nite nite Bobby.
This is a simple breach of contract situation. (unfortunately the
pertinent jurisdictions are spread all over the place –UK, Caribbean).
Investors just go after breach contract. All this other crap is
simply that….crap
So all Fatchet has done is cost us time and got nowhere?
Looking that way , out of time S.Ds , failed rescue , lots of talk and no action.He is out of options.He went down a blind alley .
Now he will try and extradite himself from the mess he created, have a guess how?there will be a prize for the best answer.
Richard / Anon,
RL will have acted to protect their clients. End of. If Ames rejects the opportunity to protect investors then you know where you stand.
As for statutory demands being timed out, that is plain wrong. As said before Harlequin also know that to be wrong. Hence TS, Bob etc are making no comment.
Ralph offers some information which has made RL.
Ames has delayed, therefore brings this on himself.
They have all pissed in the same pot/finger in the pie Fatchet thought he had a special little deal with Ames wrong Ames is a user all Fatchet has done is enabled Ames to carry on screwing us out of our money anyone employing Fatchet needs there head testing I would not employ him to walk my dog.
A new phrase has been coined –
“The Mattvent Calendar” – like a Christmas Advent Calendar.
We have loaded it up with 30 presents and will remove one from each door, each day.
DAY 8 – The Lamborghini
Fat boy Matt was so upset during the fallout with nasty Daddy Ames about his derisory bonus offer, he threw a telephone at him.
This provoked FBM to leave, he would ‘show’ nasty Daddy Ames he could con his own way , all on his own, in the big bad world.
So determined was he; FBM nicked all the investors dosh that should have been invested in a few trees (he did not own 😉 )and bought Himself a Lamborghini
The only people that are panicking starting are the Ames family, they have need to be.
I have been informed that fat dangerous woman is on RL site attacking people. Pity she can’t afford a set of Ames teeth – pauper, common as muck.
And your point is…TS?
Its clear enough?
I have been informed that fat dangerous woman is on RL site attacking people. Pity she can’t afford a set of Ames teeth – pauper, common as muck.
She has found a new soap box, the pills must be working; she just was to destroy Harlequin and your investments, whilst promoting Crozier for the kick backs
yawn… not that one again.
if ames had given her her money back (like he is contractually obliged to do) things might have worked out differently.
First things first why are you hiding your real name??? ( Erica)
This is why this has continued for so long people to scared/humiliated to even use their real names,have you done something wrong? have you taken someones money and not done what you contractually agreed to do?have you lied? ( SFO) (WK)? No I did not think so so why are you not using your real name the people who have done this use their real names don’t they!
▶ Reply
Permalink Reply by Lostmyhome 1 minute ago
I was on the other forum as salsalady and I am not using my real name as I don’t want my friends or family to know what I’ve done. I have to protect my identity for personal reasons.
Erica YOU fat old cow, you never invested and go all but a couple of quid back.
All posts since September 3, 2013 at 5:37 pm were not by me just so you know. This is my first post in a few days.
Ralph has already stated numerous times that the judgment was correct so I am sure he does not hold out much hope for the appeal.
The appeal will take 4 years to be heard. Kelltek will be dissolved well before then.
The judgment still stands and is enforced.
Fatchett was right for once about the appeal because O’Halloran had a week or so to lodge an immediate appeal.
It took O’Halloran OVER A MONTH to appeal so he is at the back of the queue.
Maybe he wants that extra time for his business partner and literal partner in crime Jeremy Newman to cause more problems?
That would be my guess.
Harlequin won’t be around in 4 months, anyhow you will be pleading Monday?
Will David Ames do the right thing for investors ?
It does not matter what “smoke” is created. David Ames has the control over the company which owns Buccament Bay. He can agree to a security package which would seek to protect investors at BBR.
We have the maps, we have seen the re-numbering and we know that re-sales did occur. We do not have all the investor details, but we have enough to understand the position. We know that some clients made stage payments. Some have paid in full. Some have only paid 30% deposit.
The land asset (with the Resort) is the only asset of any real value. It has been bought and paid for by investors. It is not something which is owned by David Ames. Technically, a company owned by David Ames owns the land. Therefore, for all intents and purposes, David Ames is the sole decision maker in this process.
We know (as we have had this confirmed in the last few days) that no completions have ever taken place at Buccament Bay. Therefore, every investor would be an unsecured creditor in a liquidation.
Many later investors bought via SIPPs and are therefore able to bring 3rd party claims. They have more options. The investors we are focusing on now, have precious few options.
We also have very little time left. Shipleys (who act as joint administrators) of Harlequin Management Services (South East) Limited have received no concrete proposals from Harlequin which would allow a Company Voluntary Arrangement.
Therefore, time is very short.
David Ames has always said to us that he wants to sort this out for investors. Well, now he has the opportunity to do this. We have sent the email below this morning. It is not aggressive. It simply asks for him to help investors.
If he is willing to help, then we will do the spadework and get the structure in place. We are ready.
If he is unwilling to help without rationale explanation then we can only draw our own conclusions.
We have asked for a response by Friday 13th September 2013. If Mr Ames wants to “do the right thing” then his response should be back with us today.
Can this proposal be expanded to other resorts ?
We have our team looking at all the other resorts and will update you on them in the next day or so.
Queries
Please call our team on 01384 889900.
“Buccament Bay Resort Limited (BBRL) investors – Provision of Security
I sent Harlequin a case yesterday where the investors had paid all their purchase price. They had not completed as they were advised by Harlequin sales staff that it was not appropriate. Whether you take issue with element or not is irrelevant.
The practical position is that all investors on BBR only hold contractual rights under their contracts. They would therefore be unsecured creditors in a liquidation. In practical terms, this means that they would lose all their investment.
The population of BBRL contracts is defined in the 2009 Deed of Assignment. The only additions being where the properties were resold using BBRL before the date of the 2009 deed.
Therefore, the provision of security to protect these investors is both possible and necessary.
Mechanics
Harlequin Property (SVG) Limited (HPSVG) entered into a Deed of Assignment in 2009. Therefore, the land owning company HPSVG has an obligation to the BBRL investors.
HPSVG is owned 100% by David Ames. He is the sole shareholder and director. Therefore, the decision is solely and exclusively his.
Proposal
I am proposing that a charge is created on the Buccament Bay land (which is registered) to the value of the investments (plus stage payments + any late interest credit).
I would suggest that the charge is in favour of a trust in favour of the investors who are within the defined population at BBR.
As the beneficiaries of the trusts legally complete and take title (or convert their interest) the amount protected under the charge will reduce.
This has no effect on any proposed Company Voluntary Arrangement as the repayment of the intercompany debt is to be funded by completions and / or finance.
This structure could be created very quickly. It could also be expanded to other resorts.
Conclusion
This is a very simple way to protect Harlequin BBR investors. I am quite sure those investors would share the costs of establishing such an arrangement to protect their interests. I would invite HPSVG to confirm in principle that it is prepared to enter such an arrangement.
In the absence of any rationale explanation, the only conclusion that could be drawn by either ignoring the proposal or rejecting it, is that Harlequin do not want to protect these investors. In those circumstances, we would have to consider any and all other options to protect our clients.
Can you return to us by end of next week 13th September 2013.”
Erica leave her alone you silly cow, we are not interested in your crap go away.
I understand your dilemma (we have spoke about it) but can you see what I am saying we have done nothing wrong and to be honest I think you would benefit from having the support of your family and friends knowing so that they could be there for you.This is nothing we have done wrong this is what Harlequin have done/doing wrong,like Mr Ames said in the Warrington meeting” his mortgage is paid up to date” so no worries for him there is there!
The very fact that this has been allowed to continue disgusts me ( I read somewhere that each of the Ames’s take £7,000 each month as a wage!)
I see the dickheads back yawn yawn
I do not think there is anything wrong with the advice given you lot need to grow up and grow a set of balls all hiding behind fake names like we cannot guess who you really are
Look what the cat dragged in the foul mouthed ones! What’s up worried that Erica might let something slip? Why not fuck off and reply to her on Fatchicks forum in your real names or have you not got the balls to do it you pussies need to grow a pair!
The problem they have with Erica is that “she records everything”
I think that may have dave worried
The problem with Erica is that she believes that the money she and her husband have worked hard for over the years is……HERS! I mean, what planet is she on?! She should accept gracefully that the Ames family are now the keepers of the money she and her husband have worked hard for over the years.
FDNRMIFOS – Why not practice what you preach and post your abuse in your genuine name?
Same goes for DAHRM
Just in case anyone had forgotten Erica Broughtons involvement with Ralph
Bob Storey
Sent from my I PHone
Begin forwarded message:
From: Robert Storey
Date: 28 June 2013 15:58:34 BST
To: Erica broughton
Subject: Re: Banned
Erica, you have banned me from your forum without even the curticy of an e mail explaining why. Perhaps you will take this opportunity to explain.
Bob Storey
Sent from my I PHone
On 28 Jun 2013, at 14:53, Erica broughton wrote:
Bob,
Can you tell me where you got my email address from?
Regards
Erica
> Subject: Banned
> From: robert-storey@btconnect.com
> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 13:19:06 +0100
> To: john_charles_b@hotmail.com
>
>
> To Erica Broughton,
> Could you kindly explain why I have been banned from your forum?
>
> Best Regards
> Bob Storey
> Sent from my I. Pad
>
How would “Ralph” know my e-mail address with a “sent from my i Phone” avitar at the end of it.
Come on Erica, deny your involvement with Ralph if you can.
@what the fuck,I would if it was not for little cretins like you. lol
Now go and beat up your wife dick you horrible abuser
Just the usual abuse. , no facts just fiction. Whatever we all want (and in my case it’s my money back) it looks like we will get sweet. Fa. So time to move on and let the professionals do their stuff.
The chances of Mr Ames “doing the right thing” – in my view – nil.
But, STG if he says ‘stuff you lot’ then all our friends in the press would love that and he has killed Harlequin himself.
If he agrees, then no finance company will touch it!!
A good move 🙂 a bright move, the futures bright it’s Orange.
@ Death Watch Beetle.
If she was still not best mates with Paddy, the CONVICTED FRAUDSTER then things may be different, she could have a tad of respect.
When it all goes tits up look no further, ask yourself, who has most to gain by it going wrong………………….PADDY and who is Paddies best mate?
Yes….
Bad teeth Broughton
How fucking funny. A wOman who makes a protest is vilified but a man and wife who steal your pensions and spend it on new nashers are saints ….
I hear spunk bleaches teeth so go suck Ames and you to can get fucked again but at least you will have white teeth.. Like little bob did . I am so glad he robbed you and so fucking mad he robbed me to….
I share your sentiment TCR.
David Ames has a simple decision to make.
Will he help investors or not ?
Simple man, simple decision
Its called out maneuvered, by Fatchips and investors
I think Mr Ames sees life in a different way to most other people.
Has he shown any signs of ever helping anyone before (except his family to loads of other people’s money)?
This whole issue of investors giving money to one company, then another owning the resort has to be something for the SFO to get their teeth into.
If the facts stated are correct, investors have been enticed into investing in a company which has promptly given away their money to another company wholly owned by Mr Ames and they now have no recourse? I am not a lawyer, but that sounds to me like fraudulent misrepresentation.
Ames – simple decision.
It is not about teeth. It is about the decision.
there are no winners here…only maybe RL
As I said months ago “it really is game over”
Only thing left is to put the ames family behind bars for the rest of their life.
If this forum fined everybody £1 per swear word, the £400million would be recovered in days…just a thought
move on peeps it is game over, money gone life is how it is without your investment/dream sad, shame but it is game over
Dave,
Say “yes” and save yourself
Dave you chucked Fatty Matty overboard, so will you save yourself and Mrs or will you joint Matt the Fat in the pokey?
Or blame the Mrs!!! She was the director after all, as you keep saying you own the Caribbean companies 🙂
Not HMSSE Ltd…..
Ralph – what do you reckon Ames will do – yes or no ?
FDNRM – RL are going to protect you. Surely, you are not that naïve as to reject such a suggestion.
Does anyone know, do Mr and Mrs Ames visit this forum?
And why has FDNRM gone so quiet? Maybe starting the see the world as it truly is?…..or decorating his back bedroom? The man’s a mystery.
David Ames is a model example of a Shadow Director.
Come on Dave, “Yes” to investors or “Yes” to Dave.
A definite no …. It’s another time waster from Fatchet ,
It won’t happen because it can’t happen.
I have a feeling he will take the opportunity to be seen publicly to be doing the right thing. I’m sure he’ll take his time before committing, but any other decision will just be driving another nail into the coffin.
Why can’t it happen TCR?
fndermnnrmn is down in the septic tank. saw him floating around yesterday looking for his ipad and buccamint room keys.
@Sid
They certainly get a report each day about the content 100% certain.
Sid; Ralph is Paddy & Newman, so its not in their interest for HP to survive.
If its gone so is the X amount of million the court has ordered them to pay will go, or be reduced by the IP.
I am not doing a FDNRM here just stating fact people need to be aware of motives.
The ironic thing here is FDNRM would be one of the few people who would benefit by whats Reg Legal are proposing!! security without paying the huge closing cost.
Could we have a FDRM?
some one just needs to pull the plug and go for it whatever that is…a major fraud has been committed and peeps have no recourse….gotta be some thing that can happen and quickly
just pull the plug DO IT
Ames certainly is in a bit of a pickle either way
@FDNRM & WTF
Cum on Bobit, are you going to run with Ames or secure your wonga? Nobody can be so confident in him?
If it goes tits up so does any special deal you have, go on call Reg Regal you want to don’t you 😉
If you must know the chips are down for ames & family
Sid GAOTU. A few issues with what has been stated about who we are supposed to be. We are not Paddy nor are we Newman.
Secondly it is ELS who are looking for a deal on the defamation case. The appeal papers have been filed in the Irish courts and between points of law and fact there are in excess of 50 Grounds + for the appeal.
This tends to suggest that there are massive grounds for an appeal.
But this is a secondary issue. The primary issue is the affect this proposed deal from RL will have for investors. In legal terms none. The investors are historical creditors so this deal would be overturned by the liquidator if one were to be appointed. GF really does not understand what he is doing on this.
How many of you predicted it was game over 6 months ago, 1 year ago, 2 years ago?!
The blind leading the blind.
Ralph, you would say that, not being a solicitor n all, you just want to take HP down, or take it and be our savior.
Well nob off.
I would rather go with a real person with a track record than some cock who hides behind a anon site spouting shit.
Hi Matt enjoying the UK?
Not for long, your dad’s in my sights
TS the only blind peeps are the ames and cohorts, who cant see they have done wrong….maybe they wont see the bars on their new bedrooms soon
@ Marcus we do have solicitors on our team. But we are just giving advice. Take it or leave it, it really is your choice.
But here are a few points to consider.
(A) GF is seeking a legal charge over Buccament etc for his clients.
We will estimate he gets 400 clients. That’s 8% of all investors. Between them the charge will be in excess of 35 million.
Ames will have to agree to this of course.
But lets just say Ames does. This will stifle any attempt by Ames or Harlequin to raise 3rd party finance.
(B) This leaves completion monies to finance the construction. There are circa 100 units available to complete on.
We already know that Bob is an example of a purchaser who has paid 95% for his unit. The RL site has more individuals in the same boat as Bob. We have documentary evidence to show that in excess of 120 individuals have paid 95% for the completion of the first 200 units.
We will however allow for 50 units to be completed on.
This will raise 10 million.
(1). Harlequin has local debts in Barbados in excess of 1.5 million.
(2). Harlequin has local debts in St. Vincent in excess of 0.5 million.
(3). Harlequin have upcoming judgements in St. Vincent to be paid in excess of 0.8 million.
(4). Harlequin have quarterly operational short falls at Buccament Bay in excess of 1.6 million.
(5). Harlequin have legal bills in excess of 2.5 million.
This will leave 3.1 million available to carry on with the operation of the company.
(6) Aside from the Irish case and the defamation case. Harlequin are currently engaged in excess of 20 legal actions which if lost will cost Harlequin in excess of 3 million.
How much of what is left from the completion money is allocated to Gareth Fatchet in order to reduce the legal charge.?
A. A maximum of 3.1 million to reduce the legal charge by 8.8%.
Ames will need an additional 3 million in order to pay the guaranteed return to the purchasers who have completed in the first 12 months.
Ames will need a further 4.8 million to subsidise the Buccament Bay Resort for 12 months.
If GF does not take cash from Ames and Harlequin to facilitate the reduction of the charge and given that 100 purchasers will have obtained legal title to their properties. The value of the assets to which his charge has been applied will have diminished by between 25 and 30 million. With little or no cash available to reinvest in construction activities.
So there is no real benefit to purchasers.
Now what GF could do is get Ames to give him first charge on the assets of Harlequin, then once he has the paper work, apply for a stat demand. Give the 21 days notice, if not paid then just take the assets for his clients.
Nice and quick. Is Ames that stupid?
It might only work before a liquidator is appointed, because once a liquidator is appointed he will nullify the charge. And GF knows and understands this.
Where GF has shot himself in the foot is by giving Ames until Friday the 13th to agree to this in principle. Of course Ames will agree in principle and GF will update us for months to come. Ames will agree in principle but will never commit to signing anything.
@ A real investor. Firstly we do not believe you to be a real investor.
But aside from that Mr. O’Halloran has not been convicted of any fraud. This was a civil action and now the judgement is facing a serious challenge. There are between matters of fact and matters of law in excess of 50 grounds in the appeal.
Convictions are only in respect of criminal trials. As in Matt Ames’s case. He has pleaded guilty to fraud and as a result has accepted his conviction and will be sentenced next week.
Whilst Mr. and Mrs. Ames have not been convicted of any fraud “YET” they are under a serious “Criminal” investigation as is their Son Daniel.
Mrs. Broughton can speak to whom she likes. We have fought hard in the UK to protect the freedom of speech.
How do you feel about people who speak to anyone in the Ames family. Surely the Ames family have even more to gain by shutting up those who dare speak out and indeed ask for the rightful return of their funds.
You are a true hypocrite. But that is to be expected from those associated with the now toxic brand Harlequin.
@TS re the Appeal, you refer to the blind leading the blind. Well it was Mr. Simon Terry who contacted Mr. Fatchett on the day the Judgement was delivered in Ireland and it was Mr. Fatchett who on the same day tweeted that the “Good News for investors was that there was to be no appeal”
O Hallorans legal team had 21 days to file an appeal after the signing of the Judgement and that is exactly what they did.
Mt. Fatchett has run out of options. He has no solutions. He has dug a hole for himself and his clients. He has taken at face value what Harlequin have told him. His solutions are becoming more bizarre.
Those who believe Fatchett has the solution will be sadly let down. He has to date achieved nothing for his clients. Indeed one of his clients the owner of 7 Capital has walked away from a potential rescue plan.
Fatchett pumps out a lot of PR. Try’s to negotiate with his friends in Shippleys LLP,
He needs to extradite himself from this mess.
Time will indeed demonstrate the Folly of Fatchett. He will redeem his credibility in some peoples eyes if he succeeds in his attempts at seeking redress for some investors from the IFA’s and agents.
But many investors, even those who today believe that Fatchett will save the day, will be left with nothing.
Ralph – what’s your solution ?
Always problems. Conclusion is do nothing. Kind of plays into Ames hands.
RL have enough to go with.
Ralph you are working very very hard to get GF to back off.
I am confused. You are clearly close to matters. However, what do you propose to help investors ?
CDRM – another backless bastard hiding behind your keyboard being anonymous- you pay for Croziers holidays for nothing in return? Maybe you can get your shirts starched in the deal? Happy with that deal? About as good as the one you did on your cabana?
@RIchard W. the short answer is there is very little can be done, the business model is fundamentally flawed. as of 2010 when the purchase system changed . you cannot build 100%of a resort on 15% of the money without bank funding to support the build as it progresses. Third party claims will progress against the IFA that’s 60%of the buyers out so he is fighting for the cash people to secure something prior to liquidation .As long as the liquidator is a bit thick and doesn’t realise it was a pre existing debt.
@Ralph, 6.58, what a complete load of bollocks you are again spouting, Figures with no substance, Don’t tell us, you will reveal your sources at a later date.
1)You dont know how much I have paid for my unit, you keep giving out different figures. Which one is it Ralph £105k as per you bent excel spread sheet or £150k as per you rubbished post. Now its 95%
2)Ames has debts in the Caribbean. Well that would be down to your bent Irish builder then wouldnt it who did not pay the bills for the work and materials for BB.
£)HP have quarterly short falls of in BB 1.6m. So BB is not now losing 1m per month? More contridictions.
Just a small example of made up figures from a made up poster.
How about posting another fictitious spread sheet showing in excess of 120 individuals who have paid 95% for the completion of 200 units. Admit it you cannot.
And surprise surprise you have again come out in support of Erica. Yes she can speak to whoever she likes. But what she cannot do is post peoples e-mail address on a forum and then think it will go away. IT WILL NOT
Erica, you have banned me from your forum without even the curticy of an e mail explaining why. Perhaps you will take this opportunity to explain.
Bob Storey
Sent from my I PHone
We all know you, Erica, are part of “Ralph” Funny how you dont personally deny it..
Oh for fucks sake CAN WE STICK to fucking up DAVE AMES just for one day , maybe we could get a flaming result….. Instead of a pile of dogsshit.
REF TELEPHONE CALL
I said that I would find out who made an anonymous blocked telephone call to my home number on the 22nd August. The telephone number was 01580 200*** made via a operator called Zen Internet Ltd. This number was traced to a Reginald Bruce ****** in Wallcrouch. I called him today and he denied making the call, so I asked if it could have been his wife S****. He said he did not know. I believe this person was Private Dick and told him so. He then hung up on me.
I have posted this because, anything and everything is traceable, even a blocked anonymous call. I have hidden some of his details because I am not a vindictive person, unlike some who post on here, Ralph, Leaky Leaky Mole etc. If you think you can hide behind a computer and troll away then think again.
Dont put yourself down Hannay. “pile of dogshit” You hold yourself in low esteem.
Bob , I wasn’t referring to me u Cupid stunt. I was referring to that situation your ass fuck Davy boy is trying on . It will not go away and neither will I speak soon Bob.
CDRM,
Crozier has done what her clients have asked her.
Fatchett has done the same.
Odd you have gone off on one about the two people who have tried to help investors.
Yes they get paid. Yes they share ideas. So what ?
CDRM – more fool you! yours years off and a lot more money I kid you not.
Ralph your such a prick, Reg legal are shit, we will work with reg legal, RL do SFA, now they do something its wrong, we give them info but we slag them off.
Then we write lots of bollocks to feel clever, but achieve nothing – ducking daft tw4t
Interesting how defensive you are of Crozier and Broughton, I wonder why that is, well let’s just think about that?
Fair play about the call, even if the scum did not deserve it
Karma,
Ralph is an Ames stooge.
Wants to confuse us all into inaction.
@Lmfao????
It could be nothing would surprise me, however, the whiter than white Broughton is just too obvious as she is very close with the builder guy – she is involved in this. On the side of a con man very odd ???
If Fatchit had charged his clients £7k there would be uproar, so I believe Crozier is getting fed info by Broughton
Gareth Fatchett only has good words for Crozier. So if Crozier is feeding Ralph that won’t help the pro investor front.
Bob, REF TELEPHONE CALL
We believe you are referring to Mr. Reginald Bruce Hemming. We have checked our staff records and nope he does not work for us. But we will call him tomorrow and we will pass your details onto him.
We need to get to the bottom of this. It is wrong that his wife is allowed hide behind the name private dick, and to stalk you.
We will sort this Bob. Leave it to us. We will show Mr Hemming how evil his wife is.
Did the police or SFO arrest her.? You should publish their full details and shame them. Like you do with Newman and Erica.
Im sure Mr. Hemming is going to be so happy with you.
It seems that it is another woman who is stalking you. Lucky you.
Fucking Freak and Predator. We mean you Bob.
I personally think it would be better for all the investors if the individual legal teams did work together, we have been told that they are sharing intelligence now anyway so it’s just a matter of time
People obsessing about people on here too much instead of looking at the bigger picture.
Folks Fatchett and Crozier are not the only players in this game. And Ames knows this. We have checked our records and nope can’t find any records for Erica or Crozier.
But its ok cause Bob and TS state that they are Ralph. So Simon Terry go for it. May as well sue Erica and Crozier for speaking to O Halloran. Lol. Sue them for 1 billion. Bob stop wanking yourself into a frenzy.
Fatchett has chosen his side. He has chosen Ames and Terry. Fine, big deal. Keep living in the belief that Fatchett will save the day.
Ames is delighted that Fatchett is on board. Fatchett is positive that Ames is on board, Ames and Terry are playing Fatchett like a fiddle.
@Ralph, well done Ralph you have published someone else’s details. I didn’t. Call who you like, that way you won’t still be hiding. The defender of Newman and Erica. Why is that Ralph? We all know the answer to that don’t we. Let’s try the old personal insults again shall we. Usual Ralph, all talk no substance. Your a joke.
@Ralph, oh by the way you moron, re the telephone call, I don’t think you quite grasped the issue, I had already been called. To do that they had my telephone number. Got it? And you want to pass my telephone number to someone who has already called me. Not the brightest are you.
@FDNRM
You say the Caribbean debts are down to O’Halloran not paying people. That is simply incorrect. Any debts unpaid by O’Halloran are exactly that, his debts, not Harlequin’s.
The biggest debt in Barbados is money due to PreConco for the work they did at the H Hotel. That was work contracted direct by Harlequin, as was the building work at Merricks. Harlequin also failed to pay National Insurance etc., to the Government.
And it is also not correct to blame the alleged wrongful use of money by O’Halloran for Harlequin’s subsequent unpaid debts. Any client building a project the size of Buccament Bay without a fixed price lump sum building contract in place is a fool and deserves everything that’s coming to them.
@SGD, nice to know you condone fraud then. Funny how some fraud is ok then.
Bob we just want to make sure the Hemmings are fully aware of the serious allegations you are making against them.
Wallcrouch is a very small place. And there are very few Reginald Bruces. Now Bob you had no problem in publishing Mr. Newman’s details. Mr. McDonald’s details and the details of his dead mother amongst others.
So sorry Bob Storey it is conceivable that Mrs. S. Hemming of Wallcrouch called you by mistake so we hope after we explain to the Hemmings in Wallcrouch about you and how you still feel that Mrs. S Hemming of Wallcrouch is private dick, that they will clear their names with Joe, the SFO and the Police.
So Bob it is time you were given a taste of your own medicine. We will even offer to fund any legal action the Hemmings might wish to take against you.
Barbados government or Preconco can put a lien on Harlequin property in Barbados for non payment…in Governments case …for sale by auction!
Oh Bobby there is an appeal in the Irish Case. Lets wait until the matter has been finally resolved shall we. See your bessie Mate and his ugly wife Carol will be keeping rather quiet on the matter.
So on the issue of “CONVICTED” fraudsters, What have you got to say about your bessie mates son Matt.?
Carol has vowed to be there for her son and visit him every week. Will he reciprocate and visit Carol when your bessie mates wife is sent down? Oh he won’t be able to, his tag probably wont let him. Ha ha.
@Ralph, and your point is? Oh yes and of course you had no problem publishing my details did you. Makes you something of a hypocrite doesn’t it? But there again we all know that. Oh by the way YOU published a surname, I didn’t. You are a faceless Internet bully. But it just isn’t working is it. And you know that.
Oh Ralphy, CONVICTED fraudsters? Your words not mine. Are you admitting the Irish builder is a convicted fraudsters now? Wow Ralphy that’s some confession.
No Bob the Irish case was a civil action. So no criminal conviction, no criminal record nothing Bob.
But hey Bob, a little birdy has told us that O Halloran, Newman, Mac Donald, Erica and Crozier are all meeting for lunch on Monday at 14.00 at All Bar One in Leicester Square.
They are being joined by a few others your Bessie mate Ames might be interested in. Why don’t you go along? We believe Fatchett might also be invited. Along with some guy called Jones.
fdnrm as regards SGD condoning fraud…..wake up, most people want a receipt when they buy a $50 shirt…they want a receipt so if it falls apart they can take it back for a replacement etc….to enter into a $50million contract with no paperwork, even a retard would not do that…..but a clever fraudster now they might…you see it leaves nothing concrete…literally
@FDNRM
Of course I do not condone fraud – that is exactly why I follow the Harlequin situation carefully.
SGD R U still in Bim? coz I am here at present and there don’t look like much going on at H hotel or Merricks
A new phrase has been coined –
“The Mattvent Calendar” – like a Christmas Advent Calendar.
We have loaded it up with 30 presents and will remove one from each door, each day.
DAY 9 – Colour of his eyes!
Not sure how this works, Daddy has piercing blue fishy eyes, but Fatty Matty – dark brown????
What could the reasons for this be?
Mrs Ames over to you?
I have been told that Ames IS going to go along with the proposed investors plan. He feels he has no choice.
Ralph, the nasty bastard.
Big deal you stolen some old database when you worked for HP, very commendable.
You support the dangerous womans. You elude to a lot but it’s just talk no substance.
You have a motive, but anyone who resorts to the dirty tricks you get up to with FDNRM, CANNOT be trusted, for the record I don’t support his way either nor agree with him.
You are a gutless bully, if you are so big and clever go to the press, the police and SFO – here there is 10, 20 people? your target audience?
No others besides Fatcet and Crozier – ok big guy put the details up, come on.
You won’t because there is no others that will take on the case, unless one of you imaginary ‘legal team’ will come out of the ether?
Come on what have you got other than a very old doctored database?
Harlequin investor group
That’s just the language one would expect from an uneducated attention seeker with self confidence issues.
@CDRM (Crozier Does Represent Me)
You do seem to have some anger issues don’t you?
I am very pleased you need to share the fact Crozier is representing you.
Would you like to embellish or substantiate what Mr Fatcett is being accused of, omitting the profanities, please.
Bollocks to all this, Ames and his bent scum bag family must go – end of story, thak his legal flunkies with him – Tw@ts all of them.
If it survives or not they go – period.
write to them lazy B***ds MP’s
Contact The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) and/or Essex Police – Harlequin and the Ames are still being investigated.
http://www.sfo.gov.uk/our-work/our-cases/case-progress/harlequin-property.aspx
Dear DWB,
I know I had a word, Dan and Carol are being looked as well.
Dave do the right thing for once in your life or pay the piper
I have no idea why someone else is posting as me (the last comment) but such is life.
Ralph is clearly obsessed with FDNRM almost as much as he is with lying. Could it be love?
Can we please stick to the plan , Ames will agree he has no choice but he wont sign untill he is under the cosh as we all know its over to the professionals now. This will either work or not and if it doesnt we are no worse off
Don’t care what appens as long as the little shit pays the price and his parasitic family
@TS it’s quite weird having a stalker. Perhaps it is love.
I suspect that Ralph is angry because even Fatchett and that vile hack Laura Miller could not get his lies published.
The discredited Excel spread sheet. If you are going to actually publish something, a bit of a novelty for Ralph, at least make it creditable and not fall over when scrutinized.
Ralphy boy is very happy indeed. Ralphy boy will even be happier Friday week. Some of Ralph are in London next week in talks with a number of IP’s re the carving up of the Harlequin assets.
Tick tock Bob/TS Tick Tock
Funny Bob its you and TS feel our information is doctored. Not many others however feel the same way. Buy who cares. The people Ralph is dealing with have taken a very keen interest in what they have in the way of documents.
Hence the meeting in London next week. Who knows the Ralph team might join O Halloran, Newman and Co in All Bar One next Monday at 14.00. Will you be coming? I am sure you and TS will be more then welcome.
This will be like the old Spartacus film. “I am Ralph” “no I am Ralph” “no I am the real Ralph” “I have the Excel spread sheet” “No I have the Real Excel spread sheet” To which the question will be asked. Can you tell us Ralph (looking at numerous Ralphs) How much Bob Storey paid for his Cabanna?
Deathly silence and blank looks. Should be a hoot..
Has anyone noticed that the FDNRM 11:43 post was perfectly
spelled and punctuated. Unlike most of his others. I am beginning
to think there are several Bobs.
Will be an even better hoot when the liquidator is offered and accepts about 5,000 for your piece of paradise. We might just give it to Mr. Reginald Hemming of Wallcrouch. Lol ha ha.
What Bob Storey paid for his cabana is now sadly irrelevant given the moves of the last 48 hrs.
How’s Carol and Dave? Is Matt going to appeal his case as Carol the daft cow told people yesterday. He did plead guilty after all. We believe the daft cow is taking all this very badly, awwwwwww.
Tick tock Bob Tick tock.
I am afraid I will have to decline the offer of attending an imaginary meeting but thank you all the same.
TS your more then welcome to join us if you change your mind.
So it has almost been a MONTH and still Ralph Newman has not provided proof of the various claims.
“All in good time” = never.
Will somebody please liquidate anything to do with HP, lock up the remaining Ames family and enrol Bob in an rehabilitation course
All this needs ending now coz Ralph aint going anywhere other than in his mind, RL/Crozier aint got the balls and the sfo are playing a waiting game….people for fs just wind it all up there is no light at the end of the tunnel and there is deffo no rescue…even thunderbirds and international rescue cant rescue HP
TS given that we have been providing the authorities with all the information, we have been delayed some what in getting much of this information into the public domain.
We feel it will be far more important that Ames does not get a chance at this stage to understand much of the damning evidence and documentation there is on him.
We are sure that you can understand that this is more then just a prudent move on our part.
Another shocking comment in a review on Trip Advisor about the conduct of senior staff at Buccament Bay; this time from HOTDOG England who stayed during August 2013.
‘I would also comment on the very senior management. The resort does lack professional management and seems to have “family” running it who in the way they publicly address staff (one of the resorts greatest assets) and deal with issues is far from professional and felt far from 5*. Also some of the children did tend to dominate activities to the detriment of paying guests.’
Was she referring to Matt Ames and his kids? He sounds like an absolute pig.
Ralph is O Halloran or at least people who work for him.
Ames and his Harlequin team Terry Taylor Dalligan etc are terrified of O Halloran.
Ames spent a small fortune on surveillance of O Halloran. Ames hired personal body guards to protect him from O Halloran.
Harlequin claimed in the Caribbean Courts that O Halloran was a very dangerous individual.
Ames tried to run O Halloran out of cash. But it appears that O Halloran’s pockets are much deeper then Ames had believed.
And now O Halloran and Co. are moving in on Harlequin assets. GF knows this.
This is why GF moved so fast.
This is not about protecting the rights of investors this is a war between Ames and O Halloran. And the investors stand to loose.
A liquidator needs to be appointed now. This will protect what’s left from both egotistical war mongers.
O Halloran makes his money in war zones, he makes vast sums out of other peoples misery. He could not care less about investors. Ralph is a clever tool designed to confuse, panic and split opinion. GF has fallen for this. Ralph has information no doubt but Ralph is not going to share this with investors. It does not suit Ralph to do this.
O Halloran, WK and some others were on BDS and St. Lucia last week. They are preparing to issue and enforce a number of Stat demands. They have done a deal with some investors having bought out some contracts.
but G.F failed my darling and dont let him tell you different….
if O halloran is a ralph bloody brilliant what a set up and they say the Irish are thick…..lollollol
lets light this candle!
@ Ralph (exposed). Nice try Bob/TS. We are Newman remember? Or Broughton? Or may be Fatchett? Or some even say we are Harlequin.
To much diversion. A lot of money is at stake here. Investors money.
We believe liquidation is the best route.
All though there maybe one other solution.
We wonder why Ames never put his Caribbean companies into administration. That way investors would have protection and would also have a very large block vote.
Then everyone could sit back and work out a potential rescue package. Investors would be protected, GF, Crozier and Pannone could all work together to find a solution.
Investors could also decide to continue or not the defamation action etc. The point being Investors would have some control.
Make your bloody minds up last week it was Newman,Erica, WK
and today its the builder!!!!
I relly think it is a IFA
Fatshit just tweeted some more bullshit. ” Detailed negotiations continue with Harlequin over investor security”
It’s our money fatshit. Why negotiate?
Where are the stat demands. ?
What happened the Hartland Group ?
@Anonymous Bob is on the RL HIG website squawking on about Erica being Ralph. TS and Bob squawk on and on and on about Ralph, Erica, Newman etc.
Fatshit is trying to dig his way out if this.
“NEGOTIATING” with Ames to secure our money. Its our money. How dare Fatshit “Negotiate”. Tell the fucking toxic dwarf to give us security. Its our money.
Ames both Mr. Mrs and son Danny have stolen our money. They are scum. Lowlife filthy thieving lying scum.
Don’t negotiate. Its time to demand. Fatshit grow some.
@Anon 4.38 what a pity you cannot read.
I have finally come to the conclusion, you were all easy picking for the IFA’s you think by coming on here you are doing what exactly? Are you having the slightest impact -NO!
Ames know that, so stop sitting with ya fingers up ya arse and do something or shut the fuck up.
You bunch of moaning whining wasters
@gareths fan club
Do you know what a CAPITAL letter is
@Ralph.
If you are Newman and Paddy yes you would think liquidation is best.
If your not and just openly said you are looking to meet up with IP’s in London – how much of that fee will you be trousering 😉
Sorry your doing all this work for what? you have prooved yourself to be a Ducking Tw4t – so its not because you have a nice side.
Nasty Bastard suits you
@FDNRM
What’s your view about securing your asset? if Diddy Dave plays ball with fatchips?
Ames will not sign I spoken to him recently,and its all systems go with the finance.
Said he dont need ames
Ooh that nasty old awkward question is coming back to haunt 36FDNRM.
Why is it that people like to post in my name? No posts have been made by me in weeks!
Can’t you make an original name for yourselves or why impersonate me?
Bob or FDNRM
Will you be happy to secure your asset is Ames does the right thing?
WTF Fatshit is saying he has a deal on twitter.
What a car deal?
Now listen here,
Harlequin is on it’s arse,
If you farted to hard that’s enough to push it into liquidation.
So, you moaning sit on the fence numpties need to wake up to this situation,
Be thankful to whoever they are in trying to help you ir HP survive.
You ungrateful shower of bastards.
@Anon 5.49, no he isn’t.
@EL2 why should any question be awkward. What’s more I certainly would not tell you!
Tell me then, stop dithering man
Answer the question please, or do you have to ask Erica for permission?
Who it’s paying for Fatshits wonder deal , it costs money to register a charge.
@Richard Hannay
Oh my god!! never, are you sure they cost money???
Bob Bob emergency!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! whats that guys mobile number at the SFO I will phone straight away.
A charge costs money……. an outrage
Phone Ralph, oh no you don’t have a number do you.
You could always call Reginald Bruce Hemming’s wife in Wallcrouch. She is according to the fool Private Dick.
Tick tock Tick Tock
This question below FDNRM. Lots of investors are interested in your answer.
posted by: We’re not here to save the world, ( but to take your money)
September 5, 2013 at 5:47 pm
Bob or FDNRM
‘Will you be happy to secure your asset is [if] Ames does the right thing?’
EL2 I’m sure no one on here has got the slightest interest in my opinion.
@Ralph. You really are a moron. Of course the question is, which FDNRM posted the information? Only you Ralphy.
Hi FDNRM, earlier today you said that all Ralph has is a doctored spreadsheet, yet Fatchett has said publicly that he has been able to confirm double and triple selling. So what makes it doctored?
Sid,
What about the Brazil deposits ?
SIN 1 : – Associating your business with a business being investigated by the Serious Fraud Office.
Ralph,
Do you have a list of resales ?
If so, can we have them ?
We can then highlight the multiple sales.
SEVEN DEADLY SINS (2)
Believe the information provided to you by David Ames.
Dig deeper.
SEVEN Deadly Sins
Sin 3:- Believing you can marginalise investors. They would prefer liquidation to being shafted for a second time.
SEVEN DEADLY SIN
Sin 4 :- Believing that people will complete their purchases on such a damaged brand.
Do you review of investors. Don’t rely on the diminutive one.
Seven Deadly Sins
Sin 5:- trying to impose a 3/4 star business on a 5 star boutique business. Bad mistake. The models do not fit each other.
Seven Deadly Sins
Sin 6 :- Being arrogant enough to believe a £100m balance sheet will give you enough working capital to complete the job. It won’t.
Seven Deadly Sins
Sin 7 :- believing you can neutralise those who want Ames taken out. It’s not a matter of money anymore.
Seven / Seven
Day of the London Terrorist attacks in 2005.
#justsaying
FFS – I am going to pass away soon.
I did think I would spend my last years in my Cabana.
Dave told me as much.
I am going to set the wrath of a nation on to the Diddyman if I do not get my unit.
Dave,
It is your idea of a joke to resell my unit to Barack Obama ?
The silly sod is trying to get me out.
Any more of this and I am sending you to the Palestinian enclosure behind the fence. See if you like that you twat.
Dave,
Why not change the numbers again ? That would really confuse everyone.
You could then resell Daft Bobs unit to him once more ?
Why doesn’t Matt Ames offer to serve his time on the other side of the wall ?
It will take at least 5 years for it to be finished. By which time he will have served his time ?
Makes sense all round. He tops up his tan and does some weeding and painting etc His dad can keep an eye.
Carol can pop happy pills and Dan can deliver the post to the guests.
A fair solution utilising civic duties and practicality.
It is a shame huge shame the brotherhood have something in mind to stop all of the nonsense but where will that leave the investors?
You can only work with ALL the facts have seven got them?
they will have on monday tick tock
Dave,
You promised me a special deal and a free Spa Villa in return for 100 acres of prime land near Havana.
Don’t let me down,
Hasta La Victoire Siempre !
Fidel
Dave,
Me and Sam Cam want to invite you to make a donation to the Conservative Party.
Your really an oik, but cash is cash in a recession.
I understand that you have resold the German area (behind the fence) to the Russians.
What’s that all about ?
Hi Friar Tuck, what about the Brazil deposits?
Socialismo o muerte !
I have to say, Fatchett’s communication tonight hasn’t filled me with confidence. It sounds a lot like “we’re trying, but it aint easy. We’ll give it a go and see how we get on eh?”. I would rather see some assertive action. There is an old saying in law which goes something like….some people will hear the spoken word, but others will only listen to the stick. The stick in this case being the SD’s. Ames clearly won’t listen so why not beat the crap out of him with the stick? It puzzles me.
Any chance of posting the RL communication?
Agreed Sid.
And all the time this has been going on i.e. GF playing games, treading softly, listening to Ames’ bullshit and promises and attempting again and again to barter a deal instead of just winding it all up (I was in contact with an investor who became a client of GF almost a year ago – certainly before Christmas 2012), the pot must have been dwindling alarmingly. Even HMSSE went bust in that time. Professional fees are mounting, and goodness only knows who much BB is losing.. All that will be left are some scraps of land which no developer will buy (you can hold me to that) and BB. Just wind the bloody thing up and share out what’s left.
The operation WILL go bust. FACT. Why oh why oh why drag it out??
UPDATE
Negotiations with Harlequin in relation to an investor security package are on going.
We have set out our timetable for commitment by Harlequin and made our views known on what needs to be done.
The legal issues are complex due to the multi jurisdictional nature of this matter.
FORUM
Thank you to people for using the forum sensibly and posting comments which assist other investors.
We are pleased to see that all investor perspectives have taken the time to post and this adds perspective to matters.
The next few weeks are crucial in this matter and we need feedback to be able to demonstrate to Harlequin the current mood of investors. The default position if investors are silent is that everyone is perfectly happy.
BRAZIL MEETINGS – 9th & 10th September 2013
In the light of progress at the negotiations today, we are going to contact all the investors who were intending to come to our client only meetings on Monday / Tuesday and defer the meetings until after the 13th September 2013.
We feel that at such a delicate point in negotiations we would lose momentum if we forced the issue on the Brazil contracts.
Expect a call / email from our staff tomorrow.
TWITTER
You may want to follow our @risk_warning feed as we post updates about Harlequin on it.
CONCLUSION
We are now in a crucial time pressured phase. We will endeavour to keep you updated as much as we are able.
UPDATE
Negotiations with Harlequin in relation to an investor security package are on going.
We have set out our timetable for commitment by Harlequin and made our views known on what needs to be done.
The legal issues are complex due to the multi jurisdictional nature of this matter.
FORUM
Thank you to people for using the forum sensibly and posting comments which assist other investors.
We are pleased to see that all investor perspectives have taken the time to post and this adds perspective to matters.
The next few weeks are crucial in this matter and we need feedback to be able to demonstrate to Harlequin the current mood of investors. The default position if investors are silent is that everyone is perfectly happy.
BRAZIL MEETINGS – 9th & 10th September 2013
In the light of progress at the negotiations today, we are going to contact all the investors who were intending to come to our client only meetings on Monday / Tuesday and defer the meetings until after the 13th September 2013.
We feel that at such a delicate point in negotiations we would lose momentum if we forced the issue on the Brazil contracts.
Expect a call / email from our staff tomorrow
I suppose unless Fachett has suddenly been seized by the
Captain Ahab/Moby Dick syndrome he must think that enough
assets remain to line his bank account. Lawyers don’t do anything
without a reasonable expectation of gain.
Why can’t you have the Brazil investor meeting in the meantime? Ames is just stalling for time again. We can all see it. Clearly Fatchett can’t.
Run the meetings. Then when Ames lets you down again you haven’t just lost another 2 weeks.
Open Letter
September 5th 2013
For the attn; Of Mr. Garreth Fatchett.
Regulatory Solicitors
Without Prejudice.
Dear sir,
You indicated to your clients and to members of your on line forum harlequinvestment dot co dot uk, that you fully intended to seek a commitment in principle from Mr. Ames with respect to a rescue plan where investors interests would be protected by way of a legal charge on the Caribbean assets of Harlequin.
You gave a deadline of Friday the 13th of September for this to occur.
Your letter of this evening suggests that you are climbing down from this ultimatum. Further more you are now requesting investor feed back in order to demonstrate to Harlequin the current mood of investors.
You state a default position, in that if investors remain silent on the issue then the assumption is that everyone is happy. However you have chosen to cancel at very short notice the meetings of Monday the 9th and Tuesday the 10th and postpone them till a later date despite your very strong suspicions of illegality on the part of Harlequin on the subject of the Brazilian contracts.
You feel by holding these meetings on the dates above will have an adverse affect on your current negotiations with Mr. Ames.
We are surprised by this particular statement given your desire to have investors voice their concerns in order to demonstrate the current mood amongst investors in their current perception of Harlequin.
You have for many months now expressed your grave concerns with respect to Harlequin and their willingness or lack their of in entering in to meaningful dialogue and negotiations with respect to securing investors investments.
We therefore call upon you to inform all investors by Friday the 13th that Mr.Ames has agreed in principle to your proposals as set out with respect to the security or charges you are seeking over Harlequin’s assets in the Caribbean.
An excuse such as that given by you in your letter of this evening whereby you state that “the legal issues are complex due to the multi jurisdictional nature of this matter” will not be acceptable to us. Given the time you have already expended exploring solutions for investors with respect to Harlequin the legal issus
If you fail to do so or fail to give a reasonable explanation why such a dead line cannot be met, we will have no choice but to publish all publicly available court documents with respect to Harlequin and its activities.
Given our suspicions as to what indeed may be occurring and the impact this is having on investors as a whole we reserve our right to ask the various UK authorities to look into the matter with specific reference to your involvement in these matters.
A paragraph of our letter did not appear fully
Here is the omitted section.
Given the time you have already expended exploring solutions for investors with respect to Harlequin the legal issues and there complexity and the multi jurisdictional nature of the matter should have come as no surprise to you. It also does not preclude Mr. Ames from an agreement in principle to your proposals.
@anon the HIG forum is harlequininvestorgroup.co.uk
GF will take no notice of your letter although it raises some very interesting questions.
And it is Regulatory Legal Solicitors. Not Regulatory Solicitors.
GF/RL have jumped in thinking that there is a slice of £400million to be had…and that Ames would play dead…well he would seem to have bitten off a lot more the he can handle…especially given that the investors contracts are with the Caribbean companies (also why th SFO are struggling as they have to prove deceit with HP UK and after that they have no juristriction) [this is why this is a very clever fraud and difficult to bring to a head]
He now realises that the money is long gone, ames simply ain gonna help and his options are limited
he f***ed up basically
there isn’t much of an end result, other than to prove units were double sold…the Brazil and other resorts were never gonna happen…is moving money from one development to another illegal…if nothing in the contracts say you can/cant etc
very clever fraud and smarter than GF can resolve (and make money himself out of
out of the frying pan into the fire for investors on this and Ames still walking free
@ Anonymous
Thanks for the correction a full letter is being sent to Mr. Fatchett, a number of MP’s, The FCA, SFO, Shippleys and the media over the weekend. A PDF copy of the letter will be uploaded for viewing on this site.
You state that Mr. Fatchett will take no notice of the letter. We hope that some who are copied into the letter will begin to understand the plight of investors.
Mr. Fatchett has under taken by a set date to take decisive action and we encourage him in any way possible not to deviate from that date. Mr. Fatchett wants to demonstrate to Harlequin the concerns of investors. He has had plenty of time in which to do this. Its now time the wider community was made aware of the plight of investors.
Its time Mr. Fatchett acted in the interests of investors and not in the interests of Mr. Ames and Harlequin.
@ anon sounds like a good idea. I will support it. Other Investors should support this too. I hope they do. We should set up a petition on the HIG forum.
FINALLY SOME ACTION
But have the legal representatives of Harlequin Investors done their due diligence on the legal system and the lawyers to use in this part of the world??
Lots of speculation and proposals how to proceed in this forum, Liquidation or not? Negotiation and meetings. But do Mr Fatchett and company understand what it takes to get to the bottom of the business structure designed by David Ames and his associates..
I have noticed several comments about Liquidation but no real explanation how to proceed. As far as I understand the companies that have invested in all real estate owned by Harlequin is owned and controlled by David Ames. How are the investors going to get control of those companies? First of all the majority shares of a local company must be owned by a Caribbean Citizen in order to avoid all taxes related to a potential transfer of shares. If foreigners takes control of the shares the property value will be assessed by the authorities to determine the taxes to be paid. Such a transaction involves ca 19% to be paid on the price of properties sold. I have no clue what the total value is of the finished units that have been sold at Buccament Bay, but it seems that the sale price would exceed 100 million US$ which means the liquidator needs to pay taxes of ca 19% to get control before he can realize any of the assets. This means a payment of roughly 20 million US$? Who is going to fund such a huge sum just to realize that once the individual properties are sold to the investors another 19% must be paid.
At the end of the day all the properties are located on Caribbean turf and you cannot move it, you must play by the rules and adopt to the taxation system in all the various countries, No government will allow any liquidator to realize any assets considered to be real estate without taxes getting paid.
I have advised before that you have to think outside the box and you need full support of majority of investors and full cooperation with Governments to sort this mess out.
If you thinks the present situation in UK is a djungle, just wait and see where you will end up in the Caribbean legal system.
I strongly advise all parties who works for a final solution to be extremely careful with your decisions in the near future and choose the proper legal representation to guide you through this sensitive part of the process. If Mr Ames have any decency left and wants to assist the investors to get part of their money back he could be of great assistance now.
@Anon, and will the PDF specify who or where the letter has originated from? Or will it be signed Anon?
@Sid, in reply to your earlier question on the Excel spread sheet.
It is discredited for the following reasons.
1)Ralph stated the document related to 2006-2008
2)It clearly shows the Cabana number changes, this took place in July 2009
3)The sheet shows a price for Cabana 23/34 (mine) as being £105k
4)In an earlier post Ralph stated that I had signed a contract for Cabana 34 in 2008 for £150k
5)Ralph also stated that I had bought my Cabana in 2006.
This relates to my information, others have also stated that the figures on the sheet do not relate to what they paid. Do yours?
Of course Ralph has never answered these discrepancies, his reply will be something like, I see you have some washing out today,or is your blue car taxed LOL
@ Sid, the document forms part of a bunch sent to banks in 2008. The first number changes happened in 2007. We never stated the value that Bob attributes to us. From time to time posters have used the name Ralph. The same happens with the likes of Whatsthefuss etc.
We have sent the complete documents to the authorities and the SFO.
@ Sid as demonstrated above a poster can post under different names. Hence more then 1 Ralph.
@Sid (1) the document refers to the period 2006 to 2008.
(2) The document refers to numbering changes. Bob says the number changes occurred in 2009 yet to date has not given any proof of this.
(3) Bob states the value for unit 23/34 (his unit) as being £105,000 but has to date failed to state how much the purchase price of his unit was.
(4) We stated that Bob signed the contract for the purchase of his unit in 2008. Bob has failed to state when indeed he signed it.
(5) That post was not by us.
@Anon,
Writing a Without Prejudice letter anonymously. Whatever next ?
Writing to MP’s, the Pope…
Desperate stuff. Ultimately fruitless.
You were thick and greedy. The greed blinded you to the obvious. It would never ever work.
However, a free holiday, a better place to go (and way more ability to show off in the Working Mens Club) persuaded you. You reap what you sow my friend.
Ames can spin you all day as he knows you have no money to fight him.
THE END GAME IS ALREADY IN MOTION.
YOU SIMPLY HAVE NOT BEEN TOLD ABOUT IT.
LIQUIDATION AND INVESTMENT LOSS WILL BE INEVITABLE SHORTLY.
But Mr Lars isn’t David Ames a citizen of SVG?
@Anon, you missed off Jon Austen (award winning journalist) He was a favorite for your press releases once. I think he has seen through you. How about MOS and Panorama? They are old standbys.
@Sid,My apologies, I stated in 5 that Ralph said I bought my Cabana in 2006, in fact he said 2008. That was when he gave details of my name, my wife’s name and the exact date he thinks the contract was signed and for £150k. He did in fact confirm his “knowledge” of this fact above.
@Ralph,One thing is sure Ralphy I do not have to prove anything to you. You think you know everything anyway. You know how it works Ralphy, I can post all the details tomorrow when I am ready.
The whole thing is a mess and sadly irrelevant. Even if Ames was to obtain the finance and expertise to proceed in a reduced way most of the people cannot complete on the constructed units and there are still no mortgages . Prior to obtaining finance the outstanding S.D and other litigation must settle and Ames has no money . THere are already charges on some land done by local lawyers and proof of this has been offered to Fatchett.
In short this is another delaying tactic and Fatchett has walked right into it .
Local lawyers are needed to secure interests in the liquidation and an administrator should be appointed to protect the investors .
No person with a brain cell could recommend action in SVG but you need professionals now to have any hope of any form of recovery .
@ Without Brains
A pint of mild, ten and fags a bag of pork scratching.
Yes you are correct, too many of the great unwashed just wanted to rub shoulders with the like of me.
The real problem here is very simple, you have no idea what is, or for that matter is not going on.
“The Mattvent Calendar” – like a Christmas Advent Calendar.
We have loaded it up with 30 presents and will remove one from each door, each day.
DAY – 10 The insolvency Service, SFO, and the Irish builder.
I am 100% innocent , people are just trying to damage the Rainforests, the world and me.
I will prove it’s the Irish builders fault, works for Dad
I just wanted to plant some trees and hug them
This has all been a conspiracy instigated by Newman and Paddy, he involved the SFO and insolvency service because they are all Masons
I will sue them all and clear my family name.
I will completely reverse the 12 years ban that’s was based on information leaked to a community support officer
I will build all the resorts and start selling start selling, get the SIPP’s, and buy another fancy car.
I have no interest in the poor people, its their fault for investing
I have a more appropriate name for Ames
No finance people will touch him.
The Toxic Toad or TTT
They say the prisons are 90% full of inocent people at least that statistic will change soon.
Garreth Fatchet is probably regretting the day he ever engaged with Ames.
It is clear he too is now in the cross hairs. He has painted himself into a corner with no options or escape routes available to him.
He has no understanding of Caribbean Law, has produced nothing in the way of solutions for his clients to date.
And is now seeking to delay matters further. His option on charges has already been exercised by non clients of his.
He is giving manifestly false hope to investors in the full knowledge that his attempts to date at resolution have come to nothing. Indeed everyday he delays the financial position of Harlequin worsens. And the pot of cash available to purchasers diminishes further day by day.
Rumour has it that a dossier including some part 18 documentation is to be sent to Seven Capital amongst others in order to bring potential financiers up to speed on Harlequin.
Cannot beat a good rumor. Better than facts any day.
FDNRM There is also a rumour which claims that Ames will complete all the resorts, that mortgage payments will restart and that no investor will loose any money.
funny …. theres also a article on ifa online on the 13th june that was obviously written or headlined by mystic frigging meg !!!!!
I prefer your rumour SCaG.
There is also a rumor that the rumors that are mentioned on here are just Rumors.
rumor: gossip (usually a mixture of truth and untruth) passed around by word of mouth
When all things play out the The Toxic Toad, will not have long left in office
I concur.
Are they rumours or rumors?
Fleetwood Mac they involved to?
@Sid Gareth Fatchett has already conceded that he was chasing his tail with the multiple sales doc but of course his pride means he cannot state it. The fact that he has gone quiet on it says all you need to know.
Gareth Fatchett clearly did not inherit his father’s political nous because it has been misstep after misstep since the Mail articles claimed Harlequin assets were being frozen in February. The man cannot keep a thought in his head and does not realise it makes him look incompetent.
Sitting on the loo & sure I have an anal fissure. My God it burns. Crucial time now for Harlequin. #droppingoffthekids
Wife woke up & caught me masturbating again. I was taking a shit on her chest at the time. Harlequin restructure must happen #onedirection
Its Over. It will be made Official next Friday. Ironically Friday the 13th.
There is little more we can say. We are genuinely sorry for all investors but especially those who will loose everything.
Shipley’s LLP are in negotiations with a number of Large International IP’S.
Fatchett is aware of the latest developments.
The Toxic Toad must.
Unless something happens its game over on Friday the 13th.
By shitting on Reg Legal more than once, he has actually forced them into a corner to bring the company down.
TTT its your fault.
Buck’s fizz was shit and fizzled out, looks like the same applies to Harliquin.
Its all happening next week:
Corpulent Corrupt Fatty Matty on the 9th = Guilty
Double selling Dave 13th = Guilty
Carol broken calculator = Guilty
Damaged Dan = Guilty
buying a bicks fizz record was a better long term investment than hp though :-0)
I just hope Ames can live with himself my guess is there are a lot of people who will not be able too.
Sadly in one way at least we will all know exactly where we stand if people need legal advice it now looks like Pannone’s or CPC as they seem like the only ones left in the race poor Gareth it looks like he is another victim of Harlequin’s
If anyone wants to join up with Ralph then contact Erica Broughton, 109 Windsor Road, Ashton in Markfield. Telephone 019427 40075.
e-mail john_charles_b@hotmail.com (thats because she hides behind her gobshite husband) All questions will be answered fully.
Bob, you complained about people putting your personal details on here yet you see it fit to put Erica’s details on here? Pot and kettle there old bean.
I’ve just seen the above post. Its a bugger when someone impersonates you isn’t it Ralph. That was rather naughty..
Afternoon Bob, Is Erica connected to Mr. Reginald Bruce Hemming of Wallcrouch?
Just wondering Bob. Bob we still cannot find an Erica here.
Oh are you still on for Monday?
Bobby and TS are suffering from a fatal/fetal case
of TRISKAIDEKAPHOBIA….
Bob we are not Erica. You have bigger problems coming up. Tick tock. You little bugger you. LOL
Hello Ralph, perhaps it was Private Dick who impersonated me. You know how it goes Ralph. Oh and by the Ralph just to let you know, but ill whisper it, you have some of my personal details wrong. Can you guess which they are?
Is it the part that your daughter takes it up the arse from Matty boy. Lol
Dear Mr. Fatchett,
We have noticed a comment on your blog site with reference to our reference to court documents.
You advise one of the contributors that to release court information is a contempt of court.
We will now include the part 18 request (in the defamation case), with the letter being sent out to you and copied into others over the weekend.
Being a solicitor you will be fully aware that the part 18 request documentation are public documents and give a lot of insight into the activities of Harlequin.
We are surprised you have not published them yourself. Although we do know they paint an awful picture of Harlequin and are of huge interest to investors and potential financiers.
The part 18 request alleges fraud on a huge scale.
Hi Bob we are not sure what your beef is with Mrs. Broughton but thank you for her contact details we will get one of our researchers to contact her over the weekend. Who knows what little gems she might be willing to give us.
We contacted Mr. Hemming and he stated that he did not receive a call from you. We directed him to BFP and advised him to contact the police. Let’s see what happens.
@Ralph, is that me you are talking to other the other FDNRM?
Now thank you for the invite for the Monday meeting. I’m getting quite excited about this now. Can you confirm the venue, time of the meeting, have you booked a room, who’s name it is in, do you have an agenda?
The anticipation is killing me. And dont forget Ralphy, it was you who named a mister Hemming, not me. Not getting much right at the moment are you.
Yes call Erica, in fact you can e-mail her, or even better e-mail me with the meeting details on Monday.
@Bob’s neighbour, Another trolling post that has got it wrong. 192.com can be your friend but only if you know what you are talking about. Why not give me a call and I will put you right.
Why in God’s name would someone want to impersonate Bob the iPad loo specialist?
Bob best of luck with Mr. Hemming. We are meeting in All Bar One in Leicester Square at 14.00. It is a bar Bob, we are meeting for drinks. A celebration. Nothing formal. No need to bring cash, your going to need it soon unfortunately.
I will have no trouble with Mr Hemming, in fact I have a police officer who is already associated with the case. I can recommend him. But how will I reconise you Ralph. will you be wearing a skirt or trousers?
If you fancy paying £7000, upfront yeah do it. Be carfull because it may not work.
Pannone work with GF, you nob.
Broughtons Beef curtains, just been sick
Can anyone help me please? please……
I want to make my lovey loving chubby little boy a big cake.
It needs to be in the shape of a Carbon Credit, big enough to hide a file, rope and the keys to his Lamborghini.
Oh forgot also some special bottom numbing cream, just in case 😉
He gonna eat some frowsy doggert mon,
I will be their, selling old fruit and veg and a few dozen rotten eggs.
I hope its the f****King end of you, you fat old bitch, Hope he gets it up the arse every day.
Your next and that little ponce Dan
@£7000 punt for CPC , great idea
You have no idea what the fee is for joining CPC idiot
Also Panonne will work independent of RL
I trust both of these firms so go and tout for business elsewhere nobody is going to be sily to trust any other firm
Of course I know you cock.
Panonne is 15% or you can have an hourly rate of about £300 per hour, depends who you have working your case.
CPC have won nothing yet, I hope they do – but its capped at the value of Ames assets – couple of million quid that’s it – tops.
What you so tetchy about?
Pannone. RL and No5 run http://www.riskwarning.co.uk
They are one and the same machine.
All,
It does not matter. The Statutory Demands are preventing the finance.
Ames has no way of settling them.
Fatchett wants the assets for investors.
Ames has a decision to make…..
@ Ralph, will your “researchers” Steff and Jane be coming on Monday.
How are Croziers 13 deciples doing, even Jesus only had 12.
FDRM -pop along to queens bench on the 11th you can find out then.
Why oh why do people miss the obvious !
The liquidation process is already underway.
There is no way the Statutory Demands would not be acted on.
Ralph, Anonymous x 100, FDNRM etc
Why fight each other, when the path is already set out. I suspect FDNRM would be more unhappy with this. However, the people on here are spectators. Gossips. Old women. Voyeurs.
Bobby if Matt cant give your daughter one I will and your wife and your Mum. Lol You dont even have to pay me. Lol
Now fuck off. Lol
@The Collective Ralph
– can we all come on the 11th ?
Will Matt be excused from the Old Bailey to attend ?
Matt,
“£233,536 has been paid to investors by way of commission payments however of the £1,745,260 received into the bank accounts, £1,166,100 was received from investors, and no income was received from any investments.”
Does that not sound like Ames senior ?
@Bobbets wife etc etc. I know this is difficult for you to understand but I don’t have a daughter. You need to go past 192.com and think outside the box. There again I don’t think that is going to happen with you is it.
No he will not be there he will be to busy giving Bobs wife one. While my wife Carol gives Bob one. She likes his battered sausage.
Anyway my son is innocent.
And anyone who calls any of my family awful names will never see their money.
Court is public , you been in one often enough to know that ! If Matt can get the day off why not jog along.
Lets meet at the bailey and discuss seating arrangements if there is so many of you legion
http://companycheck.co.uk/director/911553975
Bal Sohal – owner of Seven Capital Plc
Director Overview
Balbinder Sohal holds 8 current appointment, has resigned from 9 companies and held appointments at 7 dissolved companies. Balbinder began their first appointment at the age of 22 and their longest current appointment spans 9 years and 5 months at GROUP 7 INVESTMENTS LIMITED.
The combined cash at bank value for all of Balbinder’s current businesses is £3,744,609, with a combined assets value of £32,453,477 and liabilities of £32,180,491. Roles associated with Balbinder Sohal within the recorded businesses include: Director, Company Secretary, Llp Designated Member ”
So the owner of the business going to save the £400m mess has £3.7m.
What is he proposing to buy ? The Liverpool FC Academy only ?
Only Ames could find someone more skint than him as the saviour.
Biggest Sin – having less money than Ames and trying to blag your way in.
Bal Sohal.
O Balls Ah !
Fatchett vs Crozier
It does not mean because you have more followers that you are necessarily better at what you do.
Hitler had Millions
Jesus had 12.
Ames had 2. Robert Storey and TS.
Bals OHALlaran ????
@Ralph that means DA the better leader using your logic! Glad to see your pro Crozier position is coming out at last.
Ironic really, Ames sues O Halloran, spends close to 10 million on legal fees to date, O Halloran sits there watches as Ames goes broke then makes a bee line for the assets.
What a funny world we live in.
Ames only has 2 supporters? That makes for 3 sad bastards then.
Lol
@Anon, yes it would be funny, wonder if he will finish the drains at BB?
Ralph,
Ames is stuck of the Statutory Demands. Who issued them ? That’s right, RL.
Crozier did something different.
As you are very anti DA, you want RL to finish the job.
– Bob loses out
– Paddy O’H wins
– Jeremy Newman keeps his house
– Matt Ames gets potted
– Dave follows thereafter.
Seems an ideal scenario to me (from your perspective).
Remember, “my enemy’s enemy is my friend” probably applies here.
Viva la Statutory Demands !
Bob we respect Nicky Crozier for following through on an action to recover funds for her clients as they asked her to do. She does not fuck about.
We respect Erica Broughton for the stance she is taking against Ames for what in all fairness is her families money and which is owed to her family by that thieving bastard Ames and his wife.
So what exactly is your point or indeed problem with this?
@Ralph, educate me, what exactly has Crozier got back for her 13 followers?
The stat demands expired. Ask Fatchett. And try enforcing a stat demand in St. Vincent lol. Dream on.
Ames lost the defamation case. But lets wait till next week for an update on that issue shall we. Lol
Yes Dave Ames is not on our Christmas Card list that is very true.
@Ralph, what are you on about. So basically she has done nothing for her followers.
What defamation case are you on about. Is that the one which is going to happen/not happen next year?
The ramblings of an idiot.
Bob with the greatest of respect go fuck yourself lol, We are not the department of education. Given that you need educating go find some one else to teach you.
A starting point for your lesson in life might be to turn up in court on Wednesday. We will be there.
@Ralph, so predictable no answers. So Crozier has done nothing. You don’t have clue what you are on about. Believe me Ralph there is nothing you can educate me on. This looks like mr Broughtons type of language coming to the for. You are more like the dept for domestic science.
To the “FORE” Bob, To the “Fore”.
Not to the “FOR” now as we said get a little education first. It might help you understand things a little bit better.
Thanks Ralph, now what about confirming what crozier has achieved.
It has been apparent for some time that Bobby is schizoid…
one of him can spell and punctuate and the other is
somewhat “challenged”…..
Bob you claim we have no clue about what’s going on.
So no matter what we claim to know or not becomes irrelevant, because you do not believe anything we say.
So what’s the point in replying to you unless you do believe what we say but will not admit to it, so either way there is no point in responding.
And you will have to continue to wonder if we really have no clue at all or if indeed we do have a clue but just wont tell you.
What a conundrum.
All the voices in his head must be talking at the same time.
Conundrum indeed and babel. (or is it babble?)
That means ‘puzzle’, Bob.
It is a great shame that WordPress doesn’t have an ignore button as Bob is from a sub-species I prefer not to interact with.
Still, his ignorant, ill-informed, gullible, stupid commentary here has kept the subject top-ranking and helped portray what an utter fraudulent shambles Harlequin is. Bob has NEVER put forward a substantive argument for his defence of Harlequin. He’s just the dunce given a hot dog by the gangster every so often in exchange for unquestioning loyalty. Lonely bastard.
At least you’re going to lose all your money Bob. You deserve it you thick, spineless lowlife.
@Anon RU, crawled out from under your rock have you? “a sub species I prefer not to interact with” Then you post about me. Now that is really stupid. To ignore someone then stalk them? Now thats a conundrum.
We love Erica and lick arse, big problem we can not find someone with a big enough tongue!
Come back from the pub fancy a bit of over stuffed kebab
Matt gonna be a Auntyman wen he ave a bit of cockatwo 😉
@ Lounge lizard of the Caribean
You presumably have no connection with the Caribbean as you can’t spell it.
So no trial for Mat on Monday……..only a mention( defendant to attend) maybe daddy paid them off .
Hi there, I enjoy readijg through your post. I like to write a little
comment to ssupport you.
Hannay , what part of say nothing was hard to understand??????????.
This is now officially Ericas old forum.
A few bored people. No one cares .
A new phrase has been coined –
“The Mattvent Calendar” – like a Christmas Advent Calendar.
We have loaded it up with 30 presents and will remove one from each door, each day.
DAY – 11 A New Business Venture.
Well its actually more of a public service really, our company mission statement.
‘We are not here to stop ladies healing over, but do guarantee a minimum of 12 inches of hard wood’
Yes, its an Essex based escort service, when Matt is banged up, his Mrs won’t be getting much in the ‘banging department’
So, we offer a full bespoke service, golf buggy’s, brown eyes, prosthetic bellies, etc.
We take all payment types, including SIPP’s – we just don’t take carbon credits.
How do I enroll?
Ralph, what’s the backhander from your IP’s mates? You never did answer, as if you could really influence anything you crock of shit.
How is your Teddy?
@Ralph, can you answer what Crozier has achieved for her 13 followers? Have they received anything yet or has the £7k just disappeared?
@Ralph, by the way, if you need to talk to the police about anything, or recommend some one to contact the police try Venessa Edwards. But there again she might be known to you already.
Groundhog Day. Money gone. No one cares.
RL have IPs circling them. I wonder why ?
Think I might pop down to the fete at Bray this Sunday. Quite fancy a game of Tombola
Several big IP firms are looking and hoping, why would you not want to be paid over £500 per hour for swanning round the Caribbean without a care in the world?
You nasty lot, nobody helped Mrs Ames with the cake recipes with the file and rope hidden.
All Dan Ames can come up with is a fairy cake 🙂
The Apple does not fall far from the tree!!
An unconfirmed source at BB, said the Ames children have allegedly been charging children to attend the ‘Little Harlequin Ponzi scheme’ and
‘ How to extort more money from your Grandparents’
Our reporter was subjected to a very nasty ice cream incident
Seven or Eleven Capital
You can’t be that stupid, so why have The Toxic Toad involved?
Please help me with the special cake.
I have lot all my domestic helpers and finding all this very stressful indeed, we are struggling to keep on the 7 full time groundsmen – its very tough for us at the moment – it’s not our fault.
My husband God bless him is feeding his beloved swans. You have no idea how difficult it is, we are nice people.
Okay yes, we sold to some poor people, but they are poor and a bit smelly – do they really count?
Anyway , about that recipe ?
Dave Ames, for the first time ever is contemplating throwing in the towel.
Can you blame him? 63 years old why carry on?
It’s only his misguided view of his own competence / arrogance that has kept him going so long.
If that’s showing signs of faltering, not long left for him or the hangers on.
Could be a few bargains to be had? Dan Dalligans Range Rover?
Mr Fatcett revenge is a dish called Range Rover 🙂
Why does one need a file in an open prison?
TS could you forward us on the section on back handers in the HP newsletters, we want to ensure we get it right lol.
@Operation Orange, thats you about a month behind the times then. Yawn
What Repo Range Rover, such a shame 😉
Unless you are partial to a good spanking, strict caution is advised.
1. Escrow account? or off shore – bet HP asked for it to go direct to them?
Why would they want it to go off shore Mmmmmm?
2. Make sure its not frittered away on Fatty Matty’s court case
3. 50 + of you that’s over what ten million
4. No one completion whatsoever, confirmed by Harlequin, ask why?
5. Could they just be after you dosh??
I recon you must love a bit of rough and spanking if you hand over any money to The Toxic Toad.
FDNRM (because I am Dave’s bitch) does Dave spank your botty to make you stick up for him?
Where is that proof of resales you promised?
Sorry, Dave you must be preparing a packed lunch for Matt with Carol.
5 Years? long time.
As I mentioned a few weeks ago….my mental image of FDNRM
is epitomized by Gilbert Gottfried reading Fifty Shades of Grey
on Youtube. Check it out….you’ll agree
@Anon 6.09 no one took any notice of your post a few weeks ago, why should they now. Why dont you go down to Bray tomorrow and have a game of Tombola.
Bobby – Six days to TRISKAIDEKA…..Tick-tock
What are you talking about? pointless if not understood. YRAAFD. tick tock
Whatever deal Mr. Fatchett will do with Ames will not benefit investors.
Investors have paid Harlequin £400 Million. Mr. Fatchett is seeking to take a charge on the land or enter into some legal binding agreement where by all investors are secured.
Or at least where the assets of Harlequin are secured by Fatchett for the investors.
The Plan.
Obtain agreement from Ames to hand over all assets of Harlequin into a trust or other such SPV on behalf of all investors. Thus ” securing” the assets for the investors.
Mr. Fatchett would be seeking to give investors secured creditor status. Putting them ahead of local Caribbean Creditors, trade and institutional.
As completion money is paid, this money will be paid to the Investor Trust or SPV to reduce the £ 400 million debt burden.
Sounds on the face of it like a good idea?
The drawbacks.
(a). In the event that Mr. Ames is prosecuted for fraud the proceeds of crime act could kick in. If it were proved that Ames acted as a shadow director for HMMSE then all the various Caribbean companies could be linked back to the UK. There is also legislation which covers companies that are registered in foreign Jurisdictions but which are controlled from the UK.
(b). If the companies were to end up being liquidated the issue with respect to preferential creditor status might very well be challenged and investors might very well find that they are once again part of a much larger unsecured group of creditors.
(c). Given that their is no independent valuation of any of the Harlequin Assets and no figures available for the operational profitability of Buccament Bay or Hotel Blu, what is the net value of the assets Mr.Fatchett is seeking to leverage Investors against.
A number of estimates have been provided by IP’s who put the value of all the assets at circa. 50 million.
Thus the value of the asset secured is about 10% of the funds investors paid.
IFA”s and pension providers have written down the value of pensions in Harlequin to £1.00.
(d). Ames has always prided himself that the assets of Harlequin are unencumbered. Mr. Fatchett’s actions will have the effect of encumbering the assets to the tune of 400 million. It will therefore be impossible for Mr. Ames to raise any third party funding given the 50 million IP valuation of the resort. Any third party financier would seek security over the assets, this will now not be available if Mr. Fatchett attempts to go ahead with his plans.
(e). Mr. Fatchett is attempting to get full investor support for his action, but does not necessarily require it. 15% support 60 million would effectively be enough to leave Harlequin as a valueless entity.
This could preclude anyone who did not buy into Fatchett’s plan from seeking redress from Harlequin via stat demands or any other legal recourse.
Again Mr.Fatchett will run the risk of facing a legal challenge as it relates to the issue of preferential creditor status.
Furthermore there is a question mark surrounding the methods being used by Mr. Fatchett in this matter as it relates to criminal law in the UK.
(f). Mr. Fatchett has stated that the completion money would be used towards reducing the debt or security held by Fatchett for all investors. This raises a few issues.
(1). Given that the debt owing to investors is 10 times greater then the possible security why would anyone want to complete in the knowledge that their property still forms part of the security held by investors. Remember Harlequin and Ames have failed to date to subdivide any of the land at any of the resorts. This will leave those who complete as unsecured creditors.
(2). If Mr. Fatchett succeeds in obtaining the completion monies to reduce the debt held by him on behalf of the investors, What is Mr. Ames going to use in the way of cash to complete the resorts.
(3). What does Mr. Fatchett propose to do with respect to the monitoring of Harlequin’s finances with a view to getting the best returns for all investors.
(4). What will Mr. Fatchett do in the event that he discovers that Buccament Bay requires heavy subsidies to maintain it as a going concern.
(5). Where does Mr. Fatchett believe the finance will come from to complete the resorts given that by his actions he will have encumbered the assets of Harlequin to the tune of 400 Million.
(6). When will Mr. Fatchett release the report on Buccament Bay. Much needed maintenance needs to be carried out at the Buccament Bay Resort, and as each day goes by the capital value of the resort will diminish if this maintenance work is not carried out thus reducing the value of the asset to which Mr. Fatchett holds the security on behalf of investors.
More to Follow.
This must be Ralph (S) or the IP who will now not be able to give Ralph the dosh for getting the IP work.
It’s someone who has more than average grasp of accountancy laws, who would benefit from liquidation…………. Bloody hell who could that be?
Maybe in the ‘More to follow’ they will come up with a solution?
A new phrase has been coined –
“The Mattvent Calendar” – like a Christmas Advent Calendar.
We have loaded it up with 30 presents and will remove one from each door, each day.
DAY – 12 The family Outing Monday 9th
My family will all be turning out on Monday to support me, our teeth have been specially whitened. 😉
Mum’s made me a ‘special cake’. In the end she couldn’t find out what a carbon credit looked like, I have no idea either, so we settled for a lamborghini cake.
Once the Judge is told bout Wilkins Kennedy and the Irish builder he will throw my case out and immediately, award Dad the many millions he is owed by them in the court case that ‘s not happened yet.
We will then get on with building all the resorts at a pace.
Anon
September 7, 2013 at 11:15 pm
And your plan is?
” In a copy of a letter sent by RL to Ames GF states the following ” I am quiet sure those investors would share the costs of establishing such an arrangement to protect their interests”
Where is GF’s mandate from investors at Buccament Bay?
How much will this actually cost investors?
What will happen those investors who can’t wont pay?
Will RL GF take a fee for setting this up.? If so how much?
Why won’t GF / RL release the report on Buccament Bay?
RL have publicly stated that investors have paid the full amount to Harlequin / Ames and further state that many others have paid far in excess of the 30% completions. Given that the payments were made on the back of Architects certificates how much money is left to raise on the 100 or so completed properties?
You lot make me want to throw up.
You attack Crozier and Fatchett, the only people who stood up to Ames. Then you moan about what they have done, if they charge or don’t – then attack the methods used..
If they both said, bollocks to you lot sort it yourselves what would you do then?
Would serve you right.
PS
Anon GF Answer the Questions Please
Why would a solicitor answer an ‘anon’ on a forum full of idiots?
Why would he not answer the questions?
Has he got something to hide?
the time for truth is here and now Gareth must know what is going on with Harlequin and it is time that he shared some of that information with all of us
Ask him I assume you are his client 🙂
It’s simple.
Redress claims may help about 50-60% of people, in about 12 months time
This leaves the rest in the poop, liquidation may get them an unknown percentage in the $$$ in a few years. The IP’s will earn millions of $$$$
If a rescue plan does work the interest payments won’t start again, it sound harsh but they just cant.- its not an option.
The only choice for these investors is to hope and pray it can be made to work, sorry guys this is the way of the World.
Looks like Anon of 11.15 is not a Fatchett fan. Who would benefit from liquidation? How about someone who would be subject to a court case coming up? Who would have the time to write such a long post? How about someone who retired to the bedroom while their other half was watching SCD?
Is SCD an ironing program?
Strictly come dancing.
What GF is attempting to do is not a rescue plan. He will state that. He is trying to secure investors interests ahead of a liquidation.
Bugger did I miss strictly awww this Harlequin shite is getting a bit much now 😦 so what happened FDNRM on strictly??? update please
Going to have to start taking i-pad to the bog with me soon lol.
I used to love the telly but dont watch it now have to watch my money to pay mortgage payments I guess you all know how that is though.
We are not impressed about all these references to seven
The 8th will be a rescue package for Harlequin 🙂
Ames will never agree, don’t forget its all HIS!
Because its Sunday: This is relevant.
Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they do.
SSSSSSH, its a secret.
My point is the only thing that will make the investors happy is if Ames does build all of the resorts and give what he contracted to pay them .he wants to do this and that is what the investors want .its time for everyone else to step away and eave them to it.The fact he has spent the money, the model is flawed and the returns are next to nothing are down to the greed and stupidity of the investors and Ames.
This is a stupid thread full of stupid people who deserve what they have got.
An itch I am not allowed to scratch
A Scottish Mason has 7 tassels on each side of his apron. seven dwarfs, it’s all making sense now.
Cheating at tombola. It must be a family trait.
RL Update is bit of a “fuck you”.
They are clearly holding a gun to Ames’s head.
What an unusual situation for the chosen one to find himself in.
Reply by Regulatory Legal Solicitors 47 minutes ago
See answers below :-
” In a copy of a letter sent by RL to Ames GF states the following ” I am quiet sure those investors would share the costs of establishing such an arrangement to protect their interests”
Where is GF’s mandate from investors at Buccament Bay? – WE ARE ONLY INSTRUCTED BY OUR CLIENTS. HOWEVER, PART OF ANY ARRANGEMENT WILL BE AN OPT IN PROCESS. WE ALREADY HAVE A BLOCK OF CLIENTS WHO WE WILL NEED TO ADVISE. WE WILL NEED TO EXTEND THIS PROCESS AS PART OF ANY RESTRUCTURE. CL;EARLY, HARLEQUIN / AGENTS CANNOT DO THIS AS THEY CANNOT ACT INDEPENDENTLY.
How much will this actually cost investors? ONCE HARLEQUIN HAVE APPROVED THE SCHEME, WE WILL THEN PUBLISH TO ALL INVESTORS COSTS, TIMESCALES ETC.
What will happen those investors who can’t wont pay? THEY WILL NOT BE PART OF ANY ARRANGEMENT FOR FREE.
Will RL GF take a fee for setting this up.? If so how much ? GF – no RL – yes
Why won’t GF / RL release the report on Buccament Bay? WE WILL RELEASE THE REPORT AFTER HARLEQUIN HAVE RESPONDED TO US. CERTAINLY NOT BEFORE AS IT WILL DISTRACT FROM THE MAIN ISSUES.
RL have publicly stated that investors have paid the full amount to Harlequin / Ames and further state that many others have paid far in excess of the 30% completions. Given that the payments were made on the back of Architects certificates how much money is left to raise on the 100 or so completed properties. WE DO NOT HAVE THE FULL INVENTORY. HARLEQUIN HAVE THIS INFORMATION AND WOULD NEED TO DISCLOSE THIS AS PART OF ANY RE-STRUCTURE PROCESS.
Ames has had his chance to re-structure and has failed so should now step aside and give investors a chance to re-structure themselves. I’m sure there are many investors out there who would be willing to inject funds and re negotiate their position to protect their investment. The fact is, Ames has lost the confidence of investors and anyone who invests in Harlequin at present needs their brain testing. The funds will only go into the Ames battle fund to legally fight one of the many he has fallen out with over the years. I’m afraid the sad fact is that all these court cases come down to Ames’s own incompetence and the fact he didn’t enter into a construction contract when building Buccament Bay. I know children who could have run this operation better from what I’ve heard and seen.
Dear Sir, RL made an application in the UK courts ref. Stat Demands and the Caribbean companies. Harlequin argued their case on jurisdictional grounds and their argument was upheld an adjournment was granted and the issue has yet to be heard.
An injunction was granted by the court preventing RL from discussing the matter pending a return to court.
RL state they hold the “block” of statutory demands, when asked earlier how many stat demands had been served on Harlequin, RL responded by stating that this information was confidential.
It may be commercially sensitive but answering how many stat demands have been served is certainly not confidential.
But be that as it may RL state in their latest newsletter that they have “the block of stat demands”, I am at a loss to understand what is meant by “the block”.
A stat demand is just that. It gives the debtor 21 days notice to pay or the winding up process commences, Harlequin have a right to defend the action as they have done in the UK. Have RL instigated the legal proceedings to wind up the companies in the Caribbean? There is also a moratorium on the life span of a stat demand. Its 90 days in the UK. At that point if the creditor has not commenced the winding up process the Stat demand is no longer valid and the process has to start all over again. Has the deadline been reached in St. Vincent?
If Harlequin do not agree to your demands by the 13th of September are you willing to enforce the Stat Demands. ?
Do you expect any opposition from the Government of St. Vincent towards you trying to enforce the stat demands. ?
Your newsletter states that financiers will not invest in Harlequin whilst Stat Demands are in place, given that financiers would have to deal with the Stat demands first, and I agree with you, however you are seeking to obtain a legal charge or mortgage for your clients over the assets of Buccament Bay. Making them secured creditors, therefore tying up any security a financier may require thus preventing Harlequin from acquiring finance from third party financiers.
Third party financiers would have to deal with the secured creditors in much the same way they would have to deal with the stat demand holders. So in essence would you not agree that nothing will change?
How will Harlequin raise the finance to complete the resorts given all the above?
Your responses to the above would be very much appreciated.
@Time is running out
Fatchips is no dummy, Ames has been well and truly played – he has no choice.
@ Anonymous
Maybe become a client and find out 😉
I fail to understand how the threat of a stat demand will force Ames into meaningful negotiations. Ames knows well that if RL were to enforce any stat demands and if they were successful that would trigger the demise of Harlequin. Unfortunately RL have made this threat in the past but to date have not acted upon it.
Harlequin’s commitment re the Hartland Group, RL’s clients, has yet to be honoured despite the passage of some 6 months.
The Government of St. Vincent consider Harlequin and the Buccament Bay project to be of national importance. Would RL not agree that the Government of St . Vincent could step in and interrupt any action seen as a threat to Harlequin or the Buccament Bay project.
Have RL had any discussions with the Prime Minister of St. Vincent on the issue of Harlequin and the plight of the investors.
The Prime Minister has the absolute right and discretion to Nationalise the Buccament Bay project on a number of grounds. Is RL aware of this?
Is RL aware how and why the Prime Minister can do this.?
Is RL aware that the local creditors “WILL” come ahead of any security held by investors?
Does RL understand the local politics of St. Vincent?
In the kingdom of the blind the one eyed man is king
I just hope RL dont fall for the just a bit more time and all will be well
it wont he is a twa*
All,
Forum
Investors are raising issues on the forum which helps us consider how best to proceed. Our forum does not have the “racy” nature of the Barbados Free Press, where the main factions spend literally hours slagging each other off behind anonymous names.
Our concern is that an equitable solution be found. Forget everything else, if a restructure does not occur, then liquidation of the various Resort Development Companies (RDC’s) appears to be the likely outcome.
Harlequin Structure
Harlequin contains each resort into a separately registered company. All are 100% owned by David Ames.
The various RDC’s cumulatively owe Harlequin Management Services (South East) Limited (HMSSE) approx. £86m.
This money cannot be paid straightaway. If Shipleys, who act as in the capacity as Joint Administrators formally demand the monies owing to them by the RDC’s then we feel that the game is up.
To avert this, Harlequin are seeking new finance. New finance will require a restructure of the existing business alongside a significant variance of each investor contract. Without this, there will be no finance.
Without finance, there will be no rescue or restructure. Harlequin may stumble on, but inevitably, it will run out of money and / or be forced to stop.
The role of Shipleys is crucial in this matter. Unless they are persuaded that a viable restructure can happen, they will convert HMSSE to a liquidation. The knock on effect being that they formally demand the £86m from the RDC’s. Any such restructure will require investors to agree it.
New Finance
Any new financier would not want to inherit the problems of the past. Therefore, there needs to be a blank piece of paper to allow Harlequin Mk2 to have any chance.
This blank piece of paper is going to mean a significant and material dilution of investor interests. This is unavoidable if a restructure takes place.
Bluntly, why would a financier want to provide all the money and share the profit overly generously ?
The key to this is the balance between the two competing interests.
Our role is to seek this balance for our clients. This is what we have been doing quietly in the background.
We appreciate that we do not act for everyone. However, if a deal is agreed in principle, then we will go to all investors and ask them to join it. We may not get a mandate. If so, there will be no restructure. Others may have a proposal. However, whatever group comes forward, they will need our block of clients on board.
We have seen the other groups with their not so hidden agendas. They are entitled to their view, but cannot due to their agenda achieve an investor outcome.
Can we be circumvented ?
You may say, why not simply cut RL and its clients out ? The answer is simple. We currently hold the block of Statutory Demands which prevents any restructure. This block is going nowhere.
There is no way that a pre-packed deal would work as not only our clients, but other investors would challenge it as a sham.
We fully appreciate that the only reason Harlequin talk to us, is because they have to. You will see statements full of bravado stating that they do not need us. We suspect if you asked Mr Ames, he would (reluctantly) confirm that without our clients agreeing a restructure, then one will not be happening.
Our clients have no desire to block a sensible resolution. However, our clients will not accept being marginalised to such an extent that a wide scale liquidation would be only marginally less preferable.
Our current advice
Our current advice to our clients and guidance to users of this site is that we must wait for Mr Ames to make his decision.
We have met with him and expressed our views and he fully understands the timetable we are working to. We are not seeking to place him under undue pressure or be difficulty. Very simply, the time for talking is over and either a restructure is going to happen or not.
Harlequin promised better communication. Now is the time.
Statutory Demands
We have concentrated our efforts on Buccament Bay. However, we will be expanding our process to all the other RDC’s if no progress is made during this week. We have contacts in all the other relevant jurisdictions ready to assist us. We intend to take instructions, but hold off pending hearing from Harlequin.
If Harlequin agree to our suggested structure of investor security then we do not see the need to issue any more Statutory Demands beyond the 13th. We will however, provide a list of new Statutory Demands to Harlequin confirming that we have instructions to serve them if progress is not made.
We fully understand that the existence of Statutory Demands is not something which makes a financier happy. However, it does mean that our clients have to have their complaint resolved before the Statutory Demand is withdrawn. On what any other basis should a client back down ?
Our simple view being that anyone who serves a Statutory Demand places themselves right in the heart of the negotiations as to how any new finance / completion monies is allocated.
The reverse clearly applies.
Completions
As we stand, no single investor has formally completed and taken legal title. There is a big difference between paying any monies owed and having the protection of legal title. The advice we have received is that anyone who has paid 100%, but has not taken legal registered title, would lose all their money in a liquidation procedure. Yes, there may be some return of funds from a liquidator. However, that would not recover more than pennies in the pound.
Therefore, anyone considering “completing” should properly have the money held in escrow prior to the transfer of legal title. Any other action would be foolish in the extreme.
Cause & Effect
The Harlequin sales model always paid “commission” to both the agent / IFA and HMSSE when a deposit was paid. There is no incentive in the Harlequin model for properties to be completed.
Although we do not have the figures, we suspect the number of properties were commission has been paid on exchange is near 100%, contrasted with the number of properties which have been built (sub 5%) and legally completed (0%).
These statistics tell you that the only successful part of Harlequin has been the sales team. The development activity has been fraught with a long, bitter and very expensive dispute. The accounting activity likewise.
Therefore, before anyone considers the clients of RL or the wider investor population to be at fault, they need to consider what has gone before.
This whole debacle is a failure of the sales model and the management of Harlequin to carry out the contracts they have obligated themselves with. The simple fact is that for the first time in this matter a group of investors are able to block Harlequin. This block allows there to be negotiations on an equal footing.
These negotiations are the only real chance that something can be salvaged. You will hear negative suggestions that any plan is flawed, won’t work etc. However, when you look for an alternative proposal, you rarely find one.
Does anyone seriously suggest we withdraw all our Statutory Demands and allow Harlequin unilaterally to find a solution ?
Conclusion
We are now in the end game. We have made our position and that of our clients very clear to Mr Ames and his advisers. Our meetings have been cordial and professional. They have to return to us by close on the 13th. They know what we expect. We will not accept an announcement committing to something vague and wishy-washy in the future. That will not allow us to advise our clients to withdraw.
If we do not get what we expect, then we feel that it is inevitable that Harlequin will fail and all the attention will then turn to seeking redress from 3rd parties.
During this week, every investor should decide whether or not they would wish to join a wider group of people holding Statutory Demands (if negotiations fail).
If negotiations bring forth a proposed solution, then all investors will need to be ready to consider such a proposal.
We have our team on hand to discuss the issues. However, the meaning of this communication is to give you a frank appraisal of the situation. We do not need to hide behind anonymous names as we are committed to our position.
Regulatory Legal Solicitors
I was so so excited
A lot of post here re BBay…but what about the other resorts where deposits have been taken, the money used elsewhere and no land owned or assets of any description…what happens to this group of investors…no mention of other resorts
RL are you acting on behalf of these investors?
ok here it is. the money is gone. Ames got it. he’s hidden it and he’s paid off everyone…the lawyers, the courts, the SFA, the politicians, the police and some of the dumbasses who post here. but all the whining, crying, discussing and guessing mean nothing. the money is gone. Ames got it. He will use it to pay off his lawyers, go to court, even if convicted will get off light. Then take the money thats hidden somewhere in the world (Pacific Rim, elsewhere) and live happily ever after it all blows over. it will all be forgotten and he won. no amount of crying or whining or posting or lawyers is gonna get it back. He got your money. Its over.
Dont waste time conjecturing over a settlement. There is none. Its over. Bankrupt. Liquidated. He got your money. And he’ll get off and disappear. Game over.
Somethings wrong with my Adobe I can’t)….. someone should post
the Youtube version of Na Na Hey Hey Goodbye. All is lost.
No way is the game over.
@ wow it is as far getting any money back I think
As to Ames going to prison….little bit of time left yet
The Charade being played out by Fatshit and Ameless is just that. A Charade.
Fatshit knows the game’s up. He wants out. He is out of options.
We are now entering the reckless phase. The vultures are swooping lower and lower.
IP’s including Grant Thornton have been holding talks with Shippleys LLP.
Fatshit is very well aware of this.
£400 million gone
150 units built
4,000+ people contractually entitled to refunds, although it would be outrageous and irresponsible of them to demand their money back. Keep the faith people, remember the Harlequin dream, you non-believers! Don’t think about the maths and legalities! Instead, pour more money in. BECAUSE THE MODEL IS BRILLIANT AND IT WILL WORK. HA HA HA!
Oh hang on, somebody wants to finance the deal! How much would it take to build the 4,000+ units left? £1bn? Or are the 4,000+ other investors meant to stop being selfish and just fuck off and stop complicating things?
Diabolical. Somebody please get a gun and shoot this beast. FFS.
Anon RU agree….this needs folding up as Ames has simply either got not a clue how to run a business or is a down and out fraudster
You simply don’t take in £400 million and award a £50million building contract without being clueless (in which case how the hell do you get £400 million through the front door) or being a very good fraudster
As with all Ponzi schemes they only fall over when funds stop coming in to pay off the older investors
Selling property on land you do not own…how can that not be fraud
Fatchett and RL have jumped thinking there was a few pounds to be made and now realise it is a international fraud and are seriously out of their depth and just want to bale out as easily as possible, problem is this is becoming more and more high profile as each day goes by (hence no rescue and no action yet)
The money has gone and the SFO will close the loop and Ames will die in prison,… the whole family are one big scam
The sooner this is all put to bed and Ames behind bars the better….this also has the potential to drown Fatchett and RL too hence why they are trying to get out asap
@Anonymous
September 8, 2013 at 10:49 pm
The very first meeting Fatchops and Walton organised in Manchester, a very nice chap from Grant Thorton Leeds attended, Ian Richardson, head of serious fraud and insolvency, he was certainly intrested from his firms point of view.
Say’s it all really?
I think the update from RL is very good, not like Ralph’s more to follow I have told the authorities bullshit; this offers some hope where little existed.
A new phrase has been coined –
“The Mattvent Calendar” – like a Christmas Advent Calendar.
We have loaded it up with 30 presents and will remove one from each door, each day.
DAY – 13 And Friday the 13th
I don’t see the need to work with Mr Fatchett, we just don’t need, or want his input.
The Harlequin business model is based on sound family values; you invest your well earned money, we have it to spend with gay abandon.
There have been one or two investors who wanted their money back, so we just bully them into submission.
It would be fair to say when we have had your money it becomes ours and you can go and do one if you dare to ask for a refund.
PS. I am not guilty of any wrong doing
I don’t understand this:
Richard Hannay
September 7, 2013 at 8:20 am
So no trial for Mat on Monday……..only a mention( defendant to attend) maybe daddy paid them off .
Just for Brown eyes……
Where’s Ralph? Perhaps he has had to sell Poppy to pay for the Tombola prizes?
bob what do you think of reg legals latest update?
ralph whats up been out done and sulking? or are you busy doin more too follow nonsence.
looks like you have been out manouvred by gf. you plonka
worried investor and i lost my home on the reg legal site need to be worried – they are f**king nuts.
fillin the blog with the rambblings of a mad man……
@Anon, I see Salsa Lady has appeared from Ericas site. She has been selling her business and being made homeless for at least 6 months.
Morning Folks, so Gareth Fatchett has saved the day? Interesting. Hmmm. As Gareth Fatchett has said on HIG its all hypothetical until and unless Ames agrees. We are not the plonka lol we did not invest. Fatchett is also stating that a lot of what’s going on is secret.
BTW Matt Ames has had his case put off to next year because his defence is not yet ready. Bob break out the champagne lol.
Trail of Matthew Ames put off till next year as the defence case is not ready yet …. so no guilty plea then you little fibbers lol
teflon matty eh
Fdnrm
That a shit comment repossession take a long time in uk …..
Phew – Matt’s case has been adjourned to the 6th January 2014.
The majesty of the court system.
That means the Mattvent will continue on !
Instead of paying RL maybe investors should club together and bring in a hit man and wipe out all the Ames in one go…..now that would be doing the world a big favour
Maybe the court want to send Matt down for HP at the same time as the non existant carbon credit scam
maybe the judge has just had a nice week or two at BB being told what to do by Matt’s obedient children (sure daddy is teaching them the art of fraud)
funny bit children do follow the example of their parents
@Ralph, “we did not invest”? Yes right Do you know your buddy Erica has the Cabana next to mine? Mind you she only paid £98k as opposed to my £105k or was it £150k?. I’ll leave it up to you Ralph, just think up a figure.
Matt Ames is of no importance to me. On a brighter note we have just been told our claim has been agreed, or that we had bad advice.
@ Bob, I was not aware the laundry service was actually on the resort 😉
Hi Bob lucky you having Erica as your neighbour. I doubt Erica would have been enamoured by the idea. Lucky for her then that she bought in DR isn’t it. Lol.
We can see Bob now, cumming in his pants. Dave, Dave Erica is giving information to Ralph. Lol.
Ralph, if you are still in the One Bar, or whatever is called. Can you lean over to Erica and asked where she bought her TWO properties. BB was always one. We all know that Erica and Ralph are interlinked. How did the tombola go on Sunday?
Bob we just asked Erica. The second property was in Brazil.
Lol you must be looking at the same twitter page we have just been sent ref Mr. Newman’s wife and the Tombola in Bray.
What’s your point Bob. So your stalking Mr. Newman’s wife now. We suppose you are also stalking the Hemmings and the Broughton’s and Mac Donald.
Go away you silly fool. Lol
Ralph yes you know all about stalking don’t you. E mail, telephone numbers, home addresses etc. funny I did not mention Mrs Newmam, you did didn’t you. Jeremy and Erica what an odd couple.
irigo … iri – the irony of your statement about the judge’s holiday! In fact, I think maybe you received the same information I did regarding Today in The Old Bailey.
I find this both remarkable and astonishing. Today, the judge in Matty’s trial asked if anyone objected to the fact that he had had a recent stay at Buccament Bay.
I wonder how much he paid for his holiday, and how he stumbled across any advertising for the award winning Buccament Bay? Of course, all must be above board. An Old Bailey judge would know all about the Bribery Act 2010 so wouldn’t have done anything stupid.
Bob we were sent a screen shot of Mrs. Newman’s twitter account. Where she refers to the Tombola in Bray. You appear to be nit just an on line stalker but a pervert as well.
We see that RL have just admitted that there stat demand case in the UK was indeed adjourned.
However we think that the idea of a Tombola is a fantastic idea.
Put the 100 completed units up as a prize. Sell 6000 tickets to 5000 investors, find another 150,000 gullible idiots. 100 lucky people will win a prize. In fact duplicate some of the tickets and let 1000 people win one of a hundred units each. Who is going to know the difference?
The use the ticket proceeds to complete the resorts. Fantastic Idea. And for additional transparency lets hold the Tombola in Lagos, Nigeria.
Bob we see your on the HIG site looking to bring your infinite wisdom there to along with Facebook and Twitter.
Shocking grammar there, Ralph. Sorry, but it has to be said in the interests of balance. I always think it’s important to check one’s spelling and grammar when picking on “idiots”!
Noted Anon. Its just so difficult to get intelligent lunch time relief staff these days.
We will ensure they are sent on an Open University intensive course in grammar, punctuation and spelling.
Brazil, the one Erica had a refund on, she likes to avoid that subject.
Quite the property investor, not only blows her husbands pension, she manages to blow his cash too.
Bit of land you purchased …………. in let me think???
How is Paddy these days Erica?
@Ralph, and who would have sent you a screen shot of mrs Newmans twitter account? It does indeed prove that mrs Newman has a stalker. I didn’t sent it, who could it be? Glad to see you are on the HIG site, but as you are making comments about my participation then I guess you are stalking me. Does that make you a pervert also? Why not pop into the kitchen and ask her.
Anon – reasons unknown
The return of Erica.
Ralph, don’t let her near the keyboard, you will loose credibility quicker than
she can scoff a cake.
@Anon-ru
For what goes on here Ralph at 5:12 was positively literate yet-
nit…….for not
there……for their
to……for too (as in also)
at least a C+
Meanwhile back in the real world……………
1. Harlequin is on the edge of liquidation
2. R L is trying for a rescue
3. If they fail all the cash investors are up the creek without a paddle.
4. You lot comment about poor spelling.
What a funny old world we live in.
It’s “Paudie” Bob and I am sure he is fine. I fought hard for a refund on our Brazil property and eventually got it back. But we are still fighting for a refund of our pension money.
And we were wise enough to spread our investments and purchased in Bulgaria.
I am not sure what your problem is. ?
And I have no idea what relevance your post has on investors seeking redress. And you or Mr. Ames have no legal authority to question or indeed state who I can or cannot speak to.
I find your obsession with me and other women “Mrs. Newman, Mrs. MacDonald and Mrs.Hemming etc” a little odd or indeed weird and disturbing. I think you might actually be a bit sick.
I don’t like your tone and your constant underlying connotations.
As I said I live in a free country and should be allowed speak to any one I wish without fear or exposure to the on line bullying of females which you and some others seem to revel in.
Now if you don’t mind I want to get on with my life. So please go get your kicks some where else.
Bob Mr. Newman sent us the screen shots.
Mr. Newman finds your behaviour weird in the extreme. You are aware that Mr. Newman is a prosecution witness for the Serious Fraud Office, you have stated this your self, you are also aware that Mrs. Broughton is.
It would appear to us that you are attempting to intimidate individuals. That is your business Bob. You appear not to be bothered by the potential future consequences of any of your actions.
We look at all sites that are relevant to the Harlequin debate and we note that you are becoming just as fixated by Ralph and Erica on the HIG site yet have never discussed the real issues affecting investors.
Many on here just call you an idiot. We don’t agree. You are Ames’s little stool pigeon and an apologist for him and his family.
Ah Erica, firstly as your mate Ralph was very keen to point out to me after he disclosed details of my contract “beware Impostors” you have assumed I posted about your Brazilian property. The problem I have with you Erica is that You posted my e mail on here and you cannot deny it. Don’t talk to me about online bullying, you and your mate Ralph have been at it for weeks now, if you cannot take a bit of personal interrogation then don’t give it out. Perhaps you would like a blocked call, pity the caller did not have the balls to admit it, but there again he did suggest it might have been his wife. Don’t like my tone Erica? Tough shit.
@Ralph, and I could be a witness with the SFO. And I have been intimidated by you ralph. So stick your stupid threats up your large arse. Or do you have something to hide? If you think I am trying to intimidate you then make an official complaint. But there again you would have to reveal yourself.
I object to being called fat. I run marathons.
Bob we are not Erica or Newman lol. And you are not threatening us. You just don’t get it do you. And as for anonymous calls it was you who claimed it came from Wallcrouch and not Wigan. So just fuck off and do something useful and die perhaps because you are just a boring old spiteful fart. Lol
How predictable! Wigan?did not say it was Wigan, I know it was Wallcrouch. You are wasting your time with the personal insults. Gone past that.
@Erica
Who did you get to write that for you?
@Ralph,
So much for the guilty plea. Gotta there you sicko – look are a scheming scum bucket.
You fell for disinformation – know we know where the leak is.
pillock.
@ Erica when have you EVER done anything to help investors with redress claims? You just attack people – oddball.
And of course Ralph you have just admitted that Jeremy Newman knows who you are, well enough to personally contact you. No surprise there then.
Gareth just ignore them we think your dead sexy……
@No Name,
Why should Erica help anyone she is in the same boat as us???
@ TS and Bob.
Our email address is Theequaliser101@gmail.com , We received an email from a Jeremy Newman with a screen shot of a twitter page. We believe it came from the Jeremy Newman. Regardless the twitter page is real.
What we fail to understand is what is so illegal in that.
Furthermore and more importantly an email in itself does not necessarily prove some sort of close or personal relationship as you both seem to be suggesting.
However if you both are convinced that Mr. Newman is involved in some sort of defamatory campaign against Harlequin, through or in league with us “Ralph” (which he is not, given that he is not Ralph, nor is he associated with us “Ralph”, nor is he feeding information to us “Ralph” ) then please feel free to supply the evidence to “Toad Features”, that is Mr. Ames to you both, and his grotesque looking wife, Mrs Toad features, who looks more like a down on her luck call girl that is ” Carol Ames” to you guys, in order that they can instigate a defamation case against Mr. Newman.
@ Bob if you read your own post again it could be inferred by some that you were implying that Erica’s husband had called you from a withheld number. We were merely clarifying the matter by reminding every body that you had indeed received the call from a Reginald’s wife in Wallcrouch and not Wigan.
Everybody on this forum knows Erica is from Wigan, so no surprise there, but again feel free to suggest to the Ameless family that the should pursue Mrs. Broughton through every court in the land.
Finally @ TS with reference to your leak, we have a lot of information provided to us by investors. Harlequin is not a secret government organisation, so if investors want to speak out and want to provide information pertaining to the Ameless family and Harlequin, then they are free to do so. If that information is damaging to Harlequin and the Ameless family, as a result of the actions by the Ameless family then frankly they have brought it upon themselves.
Now you to boys would be far better off wandering through the “Meadow of Dillusion” clutching at more of those straws blowing in the breeze, and allow us to expose the fraudulent activities and theft of investor funds by the wholly dysfunctional Ameless family.
Thank you.
Ralph, you have my e mail, send me an e mail then you can confirm who you are. I have made no suggestion that John Broughton had phoned me. Thank you for confirming that the phone call came from a lady in Wallcrouch. And what’s more you decided to post all my personal details on here, including details of my family and financial details. If you think I am going to take a backward step after that then you are staggering through the “meadow of dilution”
Thank you
Bob – your tactics are blatant and completely unsophisticated. I feel certain that you will at some stage be held accountable for your actions by the relevant authorities, i.e. the SFO and I really do predict an extremely bleak future for you.
Bob it’s the ” meadow of dillusion ” and as we stated before we never posted your family details on here. But even if we did we are anonymous.
We are not Erica nor or we Jeremy so feel free to attack us as much as you like.
You are completely deluded on the issue of the call from Wallcrouch. You stated you got the with held number from BT. You called “Reginald”, he stated that he did not call you, you then told him that it must have been his wife. You then told Reginald that you knew his wife was “private dick” and you then said he hung up on you.
Problem is we called Reginald, he denies ever getting a call from you.
You are a liar Bob. You have no idea who we are, but you believe it is perfectly ok to attack others on this site because you, TS and Ames don’t like Jeremy, Erica, Mr. Mac Donald. You stalk Mr. Newman’s wife on social media sites, then feign innocence.
You attack Erica because she stood up to you.
You will find yourself buried up to your bollox in this.
You are one very twisted dumb shit.
Dave Ames is planning on finally calling it a day. The twice bankrupt and now failed developer plans to announce the formal winding up of his companies in the coming weeks. In leaked documents between senior members of Harlequin, Ames is quoted as saying the wholly unreasonable demands by RL Solicitors have left him with no option but to seek the winding up of his companies.
He goes on to state that the actions of both the ICE Group and Wilkins Kennedy dealt his companies a mortal blow. He has stated that since he instigated legal proceedings against the ICE Group and Padraig O’ Halloran his family have been the subject of a continuous stream of death threats.
He also believes that his son Matt Ames is the victim of a smear campaign by senior members of Wilkins Kennedy and by O’ Halloran. And this resulted in Matt Ames loosing valuable investment as Dave Ames has lost as a result of the on line campaign against Harlequin.
Both Mr. and Mrs. Ames deny any wrong doing and expect that the SFO will find they have done nothing wrong.
Mr. Ames states he was on the verge of raising the required on a number of occasions recently but the actions of both RL and CLC made obtaining finance impossible. He and his wife are deeply saddened for the investors as they were considered to be part of the Harlequin family.
@Ralph, does anyone care that you just like to keep twisting the facts. YOU posted my details first YOU thought it was funny to post my home telephone number, YOU posted my address, YOU posted my mobile number (which you got wrong) YOU posted details of my contract with HP. YOU thought you could intimidate me. Now you are protesting your innocence. “Wasnt us” is now the pitiful cry. Someone impersonated us. Pathetic. You havnt got the balls you were born with. Why would you be interested in my conclusions regarding the telephone call, why are you sticking your nose in? Did I say it was you? Did I imply it was you? No, but you have to involve yourself. Why is that I wonder? You did not call him or his wife, you are just stirring it up like you always do. “I will find myself buried up to my bollox in this” Witness intimidation? My my The true Ralph coming out now. No dont tell me, you did not put up the post above, some one impersonated you! One twisted dumb shit am I? Well I’m all over your tits like a rash and you dont like it do you. You started this dumb ass and you are not capable of finishing it. LOL
@One of the Ralphs, NICE LANGUAGE BUT WRONG AGAIN!
Ralphs 1st post Aug 11th
Ralph Aug 11th named me
Ralph Aug 11th Gave my circumstances in a “hypothetical story”
Ralph Aug 12 th Described my contract
TS Aug 12th Named Ralph as Jeremy Newman
So you dick head, you have got it completely wrong. Ralph started this “naming” TS has nothing to do with me, I dont even know who he is. So all bets are off now. Funny Erica always used to post You Tube clips.
@anon1
If Ames liquidates, he does so because he has failed. No other reason.
You have not seen any documents. You make things up.
Bob,
Who cares ?
Ralph,
Who cares ?
Hi FDNRM, what are your thoughts on Ames winding things up? How do you feel about losing your investment, surely you can’t still defend the situation?
A source close to HIG has confirmed that Paudie O’Halloran has been contacting Gareth Fatchett again since the judgment and trying to incite him to bring down Harlequin.
Obviously not very confident in the appeal that should be heard sometime around 2017!
@Sid, do you believe the stuff posted on here? I gave you more credit than that.
T.S YOU MIGHT FIND YOU HAVE THAT THE WRONG WAY ROUND MY DEAR .IT WOULD APPEAR FROM MY SOURCES THAT MR FATCHETT IS INDEED IN CONVERSATION WITH MR OHALLORAN REGARDING LAND COVENANTS… ANY IDEAS ON THAT ONE ?
THATS THE TROUBLE WHEN YOU LET A 5 YEAR OLD ONTO A KEYBOARD
I am positively charmed to be called dear.
That is what my source says and they are within HIG.
ANON1, I don’t believe you for one moment. However, if Ames does pull the plug that would be the line he would take – don’t you mean CPC 🙂
Matt’s back!
Back where ? LHH
@ TS we are agreed that there is dialogue but not agreed on the instigator of the same .
A new phrase has been coined –
“The Mattvent Calendar” – like a Christmas Advent Calendar.
We have loaded it up with 30 presents and will remove one from each door, each day.
DAY – 14 Works for Dad, works for me!
My successful business model was based on Dad’s successful model, sell stuff you don’t own, spend all the dosh, when it goes tits up, lie and blame anyone else.
My defense in court will be the last two points.
Hi FDNRM, no, I don’t believe everything that is on here, but you can’t deny that Ames winding up the business is a very realistic possibility given the current state of affairs. I’ve always expected Ames would wrap things up when he eventually ran out of runway and would portion blames on Fatchett and co.
FDNRM,
You know and we all know that you and your comrades put Erica’s details on here first so fuck of twat.Do you all have blue eyes like your leader?:)
That is diplomatic of you GFC and I agree. That is very rare on this website!
Ralph / Ralphs
You have managed to do something Harlequin could never do; to reduce the volume of people on BFP to a trickle.
It’s you and Bob and about half a dozen others with multiple names, I have zero respect for any of you, ‘nasty bastard’ fits you very well. Bob, has invested a large sum of money and is (wrongly I fear) thinking for his defence of HP getting preferential treatment, but he is not vindictive and just plain nasty like you – deluded yes, worried no doubt.
The irony of all this I will sign up with Reg Legal, who I believe will end up working on a rescue plan on the very thing you want to destroy.
I would anticipate your next move will be a smear campaign on GF and the HIG group.
If Ames won’t play ball he will and his crumbling Empire will be pushed into the abyss & about time too
FDNRM
Do you all have blue eyes like your leader??
We all know it was you and your comrades who posted Erica’s details on here first wanker so stop playing the victim
If there is a rescue, and its a very big if.
– no interest payments will re-start.
No 10% returns………..
Cash investors are in for a very severe haircut………………
This is not going to be easy.
@Anon, Comrades? What are you on about. Let me remind you Erica published my e-mail on here August 24th.when “Ralph” though he/they/she though they were being smart asses. Like your language, shows a touch of class.
@Anon, you show were I posted Ericas details on here. Make sure you post the date so we will all know you are wrong. Are you incapable of posting anything without swearing? Class act you are.
Could Mr Fatchett be the Vladimir Putin of this mess 🙂
Why is GF going to get hold of Ralphs poisonous chemicals, because that is all he spews out, poison.
@Товарищ Боб, I think that is a bit harsh. Good job there wont be one then.
@Anon 10.10 I’m waiting for you proof. What was that, you cannot find where I posted Ericas details first? Look harder, send me an e mail, the one that Erica posted up.
@ Bob,
Okay, just a little torture perhaps 🙂
@Garth ‘Putin’ Fatchett, maybe, which would make Ames Bashar al-Assad.
I am very honoured to be likened to Vladamir.
He is truly a fine leader. Ex KGB etc.
He has a fan club full of nubile women.
What’s not to like ?
Bob,
Its all about to fall over and finally come to an end.
A lot of people are about to lose large amounts of money, their pension pots, if not their homes, YOU included.
What does it matter who posted what, when, and who said what, when?
Why do you continue the rigorous defence of Harlequin?
Its their poor management that has put us into this mess.
Not Erica, not Ralph, not Harlecon, not Newman, not O’Halloran, not Accountants, not anyone else, just Ames and Harlequin.
There is no way out now, people will lose their money and Ames will go to prison.
So Bob, with respect, you need to accept what’s going to happen and join the real world like the rest of us.
@Conned, sadly I agree with you. If a rescue does happen it will be a significant loss, no 10% no interest payment…… and a new contract.
That’s our only options
let’s fact facts guys.
@Conned, it matters to me that all my personal details were published on here. It was done for one reason and one reason only, to intimidate me and try and push me off here. And guess what, it hasn’t worked!
@Anon 10.10 Still waiting!
Bob Now you are merrily posting on regulatory legals site , will you change your name to”fatchett does bloody represent me ” or at least I take his advice ????
Latest from RL,
All,
Harlequin Group Structure – New Statutory Demands
We have concentrated on Harlequin Property (SVG) Limited / Buccament Bay Resort Limited. As you all know, there are other resorts. As follows :-
(1) Buccament Bay in St Vincent & the Grenadines; – already dealt with.
(2) Merricks in Barbados;
(3) Marquis Estate in St Lucia;
(4) The Hideaway in the Dominican Republic;
(5) Las Canas in the Dominican Republic;
(6) Two Rivers in the Dominican Republic and
(7) Garapua Beach Resort in Brazil.
Tactically, the number of Statutory Demands sitting against the above two companies prevent a restructure unless and until adequate comfort is provided to investors. We have made it very clear that we will not advise our clients to remove their Statutory Demands unless and until matters have moved on substantively.
We have taken the tactical decision to commence the Statutory Demand process on the other companies in the Harlequin group. As the companies do not all sit in Saint Vincent & the Grenadines, we have had to instruct other organisations across the world. Additionally, there is the complication that elements of Spanish & French law exist in some of the jurisdictions.
Technically, any restructure could be achieved per development company. Our next move is to prepare to issue the Statutory Demands against these companies. We do this to ensure that our clients (across all companies) have to be dealt with by Harlequin (and any financiers) before a restructure is implemented.
Instructions
• We are going to receive instructions for the other group companies from today.
• We are going to prepare the Statutory Demands (for that we will need a copy of your contract(s) ).
• We are going to issue a list to Harlequin of the names of the Statutory Demand holders and the companies that they seek repayment from.
What happens next is in the hands of Harlequin.
• If Harlequin agree to the security package, then we will not serve the new Statutory Demands formally. We will seek that the investors behind these contracts are included in any negotiations.
• It is logical that those not making a demand (on the face of it) make no complaint. They will not be involved in this process.
• If there is a delay in implementing any scheme then we will serve the Statutory Demands.
Our objective is to firm up the population of investors seeking to have their contract dealt with and monies returned to them. We are quite content with the process of drafting and serving the Statutory Demands and have established a project team to do this.
Timing
We expect Harlequin to return to us by close on the 13th September 2013.
We will require sight of the Board Minutes of each of the Caribbean companies committing to the security package on the 13th September 2013. Mere agreement to “discuss” will not be enough. Our client sentiment is that the time for talk is over.
Conclusion
We now have a process which deals with each and every resort in the Harlequin Group.
We also have a negotiating position which cannot be removed other than by our clients.
We are inviting investors who hold investments in the wider group to commence their statutory demand process.
We sincerely hope that Harlequin will see the good sense in negotiating a solution for investors. If not, we fear the future is bleak.
Please email harlequin@regulatorylegal.co.uk or call our Project Team on 01384 889900.
Make sure you have a copy of your contract to hand as we need it to draft the Statutory Demand.
Regulatory Legal Solicitors
@GFC, GF forum is open to all, not just who he represents, and I have not taken his advice. Even Ralph is a member, but hides as usual behind some sperius ID
I have to say I am pleased with the stand Fatchett is taking. I believe him when he says he will not allow Ames more time. If Ames doesn’t play ball and Fatchett is left with no choice but to start the winding up process, then so be it.
This week will be a defining moment in the history of Harlequin. What is a very strong possibility is that there will be no resolution of matters for at least 3 years. As events unfold over the next week it will probably become crystal clear to Mr. Fatchett why this is so.
A liquidation of the assets is now a reality. But it could be 3+ years before anyone will see a single red cent.
@Ralph
If that is what happens, that is what happens.
We cannot delay any further.
FDNRM,
You and your comrades made Erica’s life a misery and put her details on here months ago you are all scum you were all over her website like you are all over GF you are parasites and hypocrites so go and spend your 30 pieces of silver Judas
the Ames family are finished , no amount of cyber bulling and threats thwarted the plans of those who have fought and continue to fight against this morally bankrupt family , We the investors did what the FSA and SFO failed to do .
The return of funds is to most parties irrelevant – we know we wont get much if anything but the sheer joy of knowing that foul family and there genetically challenged children will suffer the penalty of jail , personal and business bankruptcy and a total destruction of their fraudulent empire is enough . Solid friends to the Ames such as Bob , will eventually realise they were of no more importance to this family than a used tissue and my fervent hope is he has the grace to admit it when the time comes .
@Anon 1.21 not me. Who were my “comrades” again where did I put up Erica’s details? You have no proof at all. Either put up or shut up. Don’t forget Erica involved the police. She reaped what she sowed. Perhaps she needs a PI LOL.
Anonymous
September 10, 2013 at 1:12 pm
Can’t stand the heat……. get out the fire.
gareths fan club
I could not agree more : )
I would imagine GF remembers when he trusted Ames on the ‘Hartland Group’ and at the last moment Toxic Turd, put HMSSE into liquidation, not even telling his loyal staff – that’s what we are dealing with – a little shit.
Good move Gareth ‘Putin’ Fatchett
Nostrovia Comrades 😉
Our first comment on this website and probably the last, we’re investors and we’ve had enough.
These people moaning about having their contact details displayed, I can understand the long winded argument. If it’s such a big deal ask BFP to remove those comments. The more attention you keep drawing to your details, the more chance there is of someone harassing you.
If you have each others numbers why don’t you have a civil conversation off this website and resolve your issues so we can hopefully gather some useful information about the current situation. Over 2,000 comments on this page, lets be a bit more productive..
We’ve no interest in all these names flying around apart from those who are tied up with our money.
gareths fan club
Spot on, as we’ve been saying to Gareth, enough is enough.
Regards
Such excitement, Bob will need to get his undies washed.
Bobit, before you say I am not Erika
@lwt how patronising of you while hiding behind “let’s work together” BFP don’t do anything, why should they. Remove the details? It’s a bit late when they have been published dont you think? By the way if you have Ralphs telephone number perhaps you would pass it over to me so I can have a little chat.
Bob ,you are a horrid individual , new people come on here and all you can do is attack them . I hope I speak for many when I say your plan to disrupt the investors has failed and more and more of us are coming together in a sensible way to either claim back our money or join the rescue we do not need or want a silly little man – either you or David Ames- involved in any shape or form . You add no value , no credence or credibility to anything other than to misinform or disrupt . You have outlived your purpose assuming you ever had one! Now please leave the forum to adults who can and will resolve things .
@GFC. “These people moaning about having their contact details revealed” what the f*** is that if not a personal attack? You think it’s ok? Stop hiding behind your ID and post your name you hypocrite. Go on be an adult.
Booby oops I mean Bobby….you had your opportunity
yesterday when Ralph posted he was in the bar. Ever heard
of having someone paged?
My name as it obviously carries a level of import to you is Rachel and my original investment was Thailand …. do you require more Bob or is that enough to make you go away ??
No Rachael, it will not. How do I know that you are not being impersonated. Full name, address, telephone number, how much you invested, e mail then we will be on an equal footing. Ok?
@Anon, and who should I have paged? As the song goes, ” Ralph, Ralph, who the f*** is Ralph. You idiot.
While Rome burns etc
GFC – Patience: His usefulness to Ames is diminishing
as I type this…….
Comrade Boris Bobitski,
Your getting nasty secret police for you!
I will purge you Bobitski
Does anyone know what the official HP stance is at this point in time? Are they still serious about securing funding or has that shipped sailed?
Will Ames blink ?
I suspect he will. If so, then RL will need to act for all investors.
Will Bob as a matter of principle reject RL ?
Bob, as you see the final end to Harlequin and your investment I understand your anger; it is however inevitable it’s over for Ames and the toxic brand known as harlequin.
It will be worse for you when the dirty little deal Ames promised you will amount to nothing.
He will shit on you from a great height and not think twice; he didn’t help his son – why will he help you?
Yes, Sid they are but its not possible with stat demands. The balls is DA court now…………….only him…… and he does not like it!!!
Is that his son who pleaded guilty and was in court this week. lOL
Yes the very same one; the Dave refused to help out and could have stopped him being arrested……………….. and he will look after you?
That’s when times were good, note to Matt – do not throw telephones at Daddy.
FDNRM, I really do feel sorry for you, its a real shame, you are just as deluded as Dave Ames, and he has your money weird weird.
Hi Leaky, if that is the case is it not an option for him to just pay them off so he can move forward? If there really are serious investors, wouldn’t it be easier just to clear the SD’s or are there simply too many now?
Ames – please do not blink.
If you do then RL will be insufferable.
Hi Sid, the money has long gone.
The only real choice is getting investors onside or HP is dead – the whole house of cards will come tumbling down.
DA is under no illusion regarding what is required and by when.
I actually think he will go with the plan. If not its over – for all.
Bob Storey spends half his time telling everyone how terrible it is that someone has revealed his identity and the other half calling people cowards because they remain anonymous! The guy is a simpleton as well as being a vile bully and misogynist.
@Anon, No you idiot, it should be a choice it someone wants to remain anonymous. I didnt have that choice. You really dont get this do you. And you call me a simpleton!
Of course Ames will go for “the plan” if he thinks it will get
him off scot-free…..
@ Bob – I’m searching for a word for you beyond being a simpleton!
I do get it – you are a hypocrite. It is wrong that your personal details were made public but why call people cowards for choosing to remain anonymous.
Thanks Leaky. Just for clarity, please can you describe ‘the plan’ as you think Ames sees it, as there are a number of variables?
Well just goes to show what you are if you cannot beat simpleton.
Simpleton is probably the best word for Bob Storey. Other adjectives include:
Loser
Passive Aggressive
Bigoted
Hypocritical
Delusional
Sad
Bullying
Misogynist
Any other suggestions?
Needful Lacking Pathetic Bathetic Hopeless Childish
In other words a complete NERD
Corrupt?
Morally bankrupt?
You have just proved my point, hiding behind a keyboard.
Bob – Please flush ..the fumes are getting top you!
Sorry to you!
All,
We postponed our Brazil investor meeting pending hearing from Harlequin on the 13th September 2013.
We have now received this update. We have set up a forum discussion on this topic.
“Dear all,
When we considered starting a project in Brazil, I was encouraged by Martin MacDonald to signing a land purchase agreement with the Seller of property in that region. It was, and remains, my intention to open a hotel in the area in 2014. Mr MacDonald visited Brazil on many occasions with me and others from O’Halloran’s company, ICE Group. We used a different type of contract to our standard contract to enable clients who were keen to invest before the land was purchased to do so. We made it clear that the land was in the process of being purchased but that there were formalities that the Sellers needed to complete. Everyone who paid a deposit therefore knew that the land was not in Harlequin’s name when they invested. I state this so that everyone understands the way the Harlequin business model has always worked in respect of Brazil.
Over time it became clear that it was very difficult to buy land in Brazil and we were informed that corruption was a major issue in the region. When completing the due diligence, it also became apparent that there were multiple people claiming to be the owners of the land in question. It was then that I decided not to proceed in buying land for development in Brazil. Since then I have made it clear that my plan was to purchase an existing hotel, refurbish and open it in 2014 for the World Cup. Harlequin has made contact with the vast majority of investors who entered into a contract for a Brazil property to offer a refund or transfer to another development. Some purchasers have elected for neither, preferring instead to leave their money with Harlequin for when it launches a new Brazil project.
It is hoped that, in the near future, we will fulfil our plans in purchasing an existing hotel in Brazil and upgrade it in a similar way as we have done with blu, St Lucia.
Sincerely,
Dave Ames
Chairman”
We would be really interested to hear from investors. None of our investors recall any offer of a refund.
The amounts involved are multi million, so this is a big deal for the investors involved.
We are advising Statutory Demands be issued to Harlequin Property Brazil (SVG) Limited where refunds are owing. Please speak to our team on 01384 889900.
We need to hear from Brazil investors as a group are considering supplemental action to secure their position. We do not want to set this out in open forum. Please email us harlequin@regulatorylegal.co.uk or call us on 01384 889900.
Ames won’t like being backed in a corner, but it’s time now for him to do the right thing.
One thing for sure if he dithers – there will no doubt be a few more weapons in the Reg Legal Armory – maybe a few sidewinder missiles or grenades
Bloody hand the little toxic toad upside down if he won’t sign it.
nincompoop! Hang upside down!
A certain poetic justice is just round the corner. If Ames does not agree; I don’t believe he will – after all it his HIS resort – its over 🙂
If he does agree finance, and its is forthcoming, Seven Capital will have him so stitched up he will have little or no say in his ‘made up’ job.
He is doing this because it will curry favor with the SFO
I will let them have my quid after the natives move in, and I can’t blame them
maybe SVG will benefit after all.
O Bobit, Bobit! wherefore art thou Bobit?
Dave, Oh Dave, so so sorry I left my post…. needed to drop cargo at poo bay……. please forgive me!
I will say 6000 hail Davids and self Flagellation with my Buccament Bay bathrobe – Please forgive me oh no I have failed you.
He’s on the phone with Pope Francis: confessing.
Bob wants to join RL.
My God… the creep is Opus Dei(ve)
As a punishment:
He will have his throat cut across and his bobbies helmet torn out by the root and buried in Buccament Bay.Beach.
So Scrot it be 😉
Are you still with us Ralph?
A new phrase has been coined –
“The Mattvent Calendar” – like a Christmas Advent Calendar.
We have loaded it up with 30 presents and will remove one from each door, each day.
DAY – 15 The future is Orange.
When incompetence and dishonesty catch up with ‘The family’ as it inevitably will, it isn’t pretty to watch. First, they crawl into a shell. Then, they try to cover it up. When that fails, they blame or bargain.
Serious question to ‘The dirty dozen’ on this blog. would you support a rescue plan or prefer liquidation.
They are the only two choices, and it could be this week, depending on what Mr Ames decides.
I would much prefer to see a workable rescue rather than liquidation and would give a realistic well thought out rescue my full support. But that is obviously subject to external finance being available.
Well said Sid, Liquidation does nothing for investors, only satisfies those intent on “revenge”
Sid – liquidation is looking ever more likely if Ames does not bend over for RL.
Ralph – where art thou ?
Brazilian deposits available – please call Mr M Ames for details
Hi Folks it looks like its all going to be ok. According to the latest update from United to Succeed, A judge has made a ruling on the defamation case. A judge made a judgement to shut down Harlecon.
Ames is getting finance to complete all resorts.
An announcement will be made by Ames in October / November.
Construction work will commence 3-6 months later.
The SFO investigation is a load of bollox. Once SFO drop case against Harlequin money will flow in.
Purchasers with SIPPs are now completing on Buccament Bay.
Ames won the Irish Case. Appears to be no appeal.
Ames will get £30 million from Wilkins Kennedy.
So folks no liquidation, no need for the Arc Angel Gareth, its all ok. Ames will save all investors.
Trully fantastic news. Bob can we be friends, please Bob, please please we are so sorry. Please forgive us. We beg you to show us mercy.
We are so sorry for doubting you. So so sorry.
Ames doesn’t have to bend over for Fatchett, he just has to offer some investors the security they are entitled to. If Ames refuses to do that, it will prove that he is only in it for himself and is not concerned about the welfare of the people who have invested in him.
Come on Ralph, less waffle come up with something, or will that be another lame excuse……
I’ve just read the Ready2Invest bulletin. FDNRM couldn’t have written it better himself!
It’s an odd name too isn’t it, Ready2Invest? Most of us were ready 7 years ago! I wonder how many investors who were expecting a return in 2-3 years would have put their money in knowing it was a 10 year plan at best.
It’s just stupid, could have come from the mouth of Ames, in the death role now.
I have got to the stage now where I am bored with BFP and Harlequin and just want closure and move on with my life. Its depressing.
I hope they are all left penniless or in jail.I am a firm beliver in what goes around come around.
They will not have a happy life all the wrong they have done.
@Sid, I dont understand you at all. One minute you seem to be a voice of reason, the next you make rather stupid comments such as the one above. Thanks for that.
If anyone wants to know where “Ralph” has been, he has been climbing all over RL. Ralph=Worried Investor=Erica Broughton. We have the tale on RL of poor old Erica being bullied by nasty HP personnel when she wanted to get her money back. She is going to supply transcripts of the recorded telephone conversations, copies of the e-mails HP sent to Panorama (hope she discloses who they were sent to in Panorama) and the question of the court transcripts has arisen again, threatened but not delivered. Well I will repeat myself, I hope RL check the accuracy of any information handed over by “Ralph” as the Excel spread sheets were fictional. Even Laura Miller refused to be conned by them. Erica did it seem receive a £15k refund from HP regarding her investment in Brasil. Isnt it ironic that Erica having received a refund is classed as an warrior for the little man, but anyone else is classed as scum. Amazing.
Bob we are sure that Worried Investor will deal with RL in a manner that befits his/her needs.
And we are sure that RL will deal with it accordingly.
Why do you feel it necessary to attempt to interfere and make assumptions or statements of fact on issues you know absolutely nothing about.
It is beyond us.
Bob, I have no interest in Erica – she is unimportant, a nobody like you.
I am interested in trying to salvage something out of this hole your mate Ames has dug us all into.
So, with respect stop being fixated on all the wrong things and shut up.
Looks to me like Gareth is sticking the boot in until Ames surrenders and works with the rescue plan – excellent, about time.
Harlequin are now on the ropes and don’t like it.
Bob, what do you think about Gareth representing you by default 😉
stop press …..Paudie Ohalloran born in essex – Rumoured to be Dave Ames lovechild – business split when Carole Ames discovered this
MORE ON THIS BREAKING STOREY LATER
Bob, you are one sick puppy, ames made you go mad along with broughton
Investigations are still ongoing regarding missing ladies underwear from Mrs Ames washing line, initially thought to be a wind sock.
We have a suspect in custody who had been camping out in a nearby field, naked, whilst rolling round in Harlequin brochures smeared in what seems to be Golf buggy oil????
@FDNRM, just a joke my friend.
FDNRM: You are a worthless, moronic and deluded fool, whose main motive on this site has been to provide yourself with an excuse to hide away from reality atop a Thunder Box – spouting puerile crap from both end of your vile orifices. Do you ever see daylight you stupid, stupid LITTLE man (in the metaphorical sense of course – but then again if the cap fits………….!)
@Ralph, what have I commented on that I know nothing about in my post of 12.08?
Are you saying that the information is wrong? What exactly are you talking about?
@icu4wotur, does this mean you have become one of my followers? As you obviously time on your hands, i.e. stalking me, should I send you a CD, my son.
Admit Bob, you have now come over to the Gareth’s Groupies side
@ the taxidermed cat. I have heard the Essex bit is true. Jeez you could be sued for suggesting that Mr. O Halloran is Ames’s love child. I call upon you to prove that scurrilous allegation. You heinous feind.
Funny thing O Halloran had a Persian Cat stuffed after he left it starve to death.
Bob, you kiss, my ass mother fucker. ( just thought I’d throw that in, everyone else is attacking Bob, I did not want to be left out and I don’t even know him).
I don’t even know why I came on here, I am now finished in the toilet so better go back to the bar and finish my Campari and Coke (they ran out of oranges) , and watch rest of the Video on Suzi Quattro and The Pleasure Seekers. Suzi Quattro by the way Bob is not a motor bike, and sadly The Pleasure Seekers despite its subtle title is not a 60’s low budget movie, but is one of the Greatest Bands of all time.
Rock on mother fuckers.
More likely a 4 wheel drive, AKA Audi Quattro.
I have been advised of some breaking News regarding ‘Dirty Dave’
More to follow………..
A clue in in my name,,,,,, 😉
@ red monkey……you mean he is swinging through the basildon trees eating bannanas
@ gorrila in the mist
Nope it was one the names for a famous Spanish libertine.
Another clue, Mr Ames proclivities are the same……. 😉
Don Quixote? that’s daft?
Looks like DA and Carlos Danger have a lot in common…..
Don Juan …….. ?????
Kawasaki ZX-7 motor bike?
Well by all accounts Mr Ames like a good ride, wink, wink, nudge, nudge snigger snigger 😉
Don Juan aka Red Monkey is portrayed as a wealthy, seductive libertine who devotes his life to seducing women, taking great pride in his ability to seduce women of all ages and stations in life especially in the Caribbean
( ok I added the last bit on)
More to follow………………
That’s one way to get a big fat discount on a million dollar
decorating fee…just sayin’
All I will say for the moment is Barbados……
And there is more to Dirty Dave than meets the eye!!
More to follow…….
At this juncture all I will say is taking pictures of people and following them is not something reserved just for Mr Ames and his Private Investigators.
All in good time, all in good time…..
OMG – I hope it wan’t Ginger Girl
If you have 400m and cannot get a shag then it is a poor effort
Have you seen Carol? Can’t blame him.
And why does Ames AWAYS stay over prior to going to Buccament Bay?
Did I mention he has a concubine Barbados …… Bob, would it be improper if we were to ‘leak’ the name? You know a bit like you did with Erica?
Maybe, an address? some little pictures?
Ralph – From what I know of the British press this should get them
going wild…add sex and infidelity to a boring fraud/ponzi scheme
and you’ve got yourself a feeding frenzy. Good news is that it would
fill up some of those empty BA/Virgin seats.
Sorry this is all wrong. If Ames wants to shag or sleep around that is his business. When Pat Cash travels to Buccament Bay he sleeps around so does Andy Townsend. And we had Janet Franke of Harlequin who was shagging one of the managers until he got sense and dumped her. Ames found out and dumped him.
We even had the former government press secretary for the SVG government bringing under age boys onto the resort. (He was murdered subsequently )
Simon Taylor likes to sample the Caribbean delights.
So who cares?
Dave Ames was accused of beastiality, wrongly it turns out because it was only his wife Carol.
Mrs Ames may care…..
Mr Ames may care……
I don’t give give a shit
I dont give a shit either.
Heh hang on. Ralph are you us? Hi Ralph are you a you or a we or a them?
Heh Bob you twisted little prick. Where are you?
I Am Ralph, you are Ralph, we are Ralph.
Well, well, Dirty Diddy Dave ‘aving a dabble.
I wonder if there are any little blue eyed babies in the Caribbean?
We have a picture of ‘someone’ hog tied with some sort of gagging device, they are being spanked at a pace……
I will confirm who, but its not a pretty picture
More to follow…….
All,
Are completion profits owed to Original Buyers from the 50 people completing ?
We are told that 50 people are ready to complete. We have seen no hard evidence of this.
If these people are Original Buyers at Buccament Bay then they will simply have their balance to pay.
If these people (or some of them) are 2nd Buyers then they will have to account to the Original Buyer for their profit.
We have many of the Original Buyers telling us that they resold their contract via the secondary market created by Harlequin.
Remember, the Original Buyer only received their profit upon completion by the 2nd Buyer. Therefore with only around 110 units ready to complete on there must be instances of resale where profit is owed to the Original Buyer.
It seems to us that Original Buyers who entered the resale process should raise the query with Harlequin as to whether their resold unit has completed. If so, then the completion monies are not owed to Harlequin, but to the Original Buyer.
One unusual element of the resale structure is that there is no contractual nexus between Original Buyer and 2nd Buyer. More often than not, the parties do not know who each other are. Difficult to pay someone when you do not know who they are !
We are continuing to piece together the Original Buyer population to the contracts / original maps. Be in contact with us if you undertook a resale and have not as yet spoken to us. 01384 889900.
As part of any formal restructure process, we are going to insist that there is a proper audit of the sales / resales on Buccament Bay. This sits in our “shopping list” next to investor security and the Statutory Demands being dealt with.
We only have 2 more days to wait before Mr Ames is going to return to us. We sincerely hope all the “positive news” from Harlequin in their 3 emails (yesterday – Brazil, today – Pro Harlequin, today – Harlequin) is backed up by substance and action. Talk at this point is all but finished.
Regulatory Legal Solicitors
Dave Ames has a very simple, but difficult choice to make; the right thing for investors, or not. The latter will force the administration of the Group.
He then will of course add Reg Legal for his retarded business acumen, the other people we all know.
Dear Investors
We hope you had an enjoyable summer and got your holidays in during the sunny weather. The volunteers at PHIG didn’t – we’ve been keeping tabs on what’s been happening at Harlequin culminating in a lengthy meeting in Basildon about a week ago.
Harlequin re-structuring. The top question for all of us – what’s happening? As we’re all investors with an understanding of business and the way it works, it will come as no surprise that all of the details have to remain confidential and cannot be discussed openly at this time. When Harlequin and the various people they are talking to with regard to the re-structuring are ready to reveal the details, we can expect formal announcements. Confidentiality at this stage of financial and business discussions is absolutely normal in all companies undergoing any kind of re-structuring. We all have to understand that and remain patient for the details to be made public.
We have however been told by Harlequin that talks are going well and that the other parties are both credible and serious. We share their confidence that these talks will result in an injection of both money and skills to take the business forward and achieve its original objectives of delivering luxury properties. We expect there to be no dilution of investors interests without consent, which is probably the single most important piece of news for investors at this time.
When can we expect an announcement? At this point it is looking like October but as we all know from our business experience, these sorts of discussions sometimes take longer. We all need to continue to be patient to ensure the discussions have the desired outcome.
When will building re-start? We just don’t know at this point. One can take a few guesses based on UK build projects and probably end up with something like 3 to 6 months from the announcement. It is possible that building on different resorts will restart at different times. Allowances need to be made for finding builders, re-letting contracts and getting materials to sites before the build can recommence. Some may already be there but shipping in the balance won’t happen overnight.
Irish Court Case. The judgment is out in the open – Harlequin won ! The judgment not only vindicated Harlequin but gave a seriously damning indictment of the Defendants’ activities.
The challenge now is to recover the misappropriated assets. Paudie O’Halloran has been ordered to pay the damages of US $1.9m and 120,000 euros relating to the misappropriated funds sent to Ireland in damages plus costs. Not huge amounts in the greater scheme of things but the positive impact of the judgment on Harlequin is massive, inspiring confidence in potential re-structuring partners and the wider financial world.
Future cases. One of the next major cases is the much publicised claim against accountants Wilkins Kennedy. Take a look here to see some of the public comments made so far. You’ll have to sign in to see it in full.
http://www.accountingweb.co.uk/article/harlequin-wins-fraud-case-against-construction-group/545395
As a consequence of winning the Irish case, Harlequin are suitably bullish about this one, especially as one of the key witnesses in the Irish trial is a Defendant in the Wilkins Kennedy case and was roundly chastised for his actions by the Irish judge. If – or indeed when – Harlequin wins that one we’re looking at up to the £30m claimed being recovered. Dave Ames assures investors that funds recovered by Harlequin will go back into the projects.
Buccament Bay. We understand that there are about 50 completions in progress comprising both pension monies and new cash. Those investors who are progressing through completions have sufficient confidence in the project to proceed. What else can we say – more good news.
We are also told that Buccament Bay bookings continue to go well, with bookings as far ahead as 2017. During the current 6 week period, September to mid-October, most Caribbean hotels and resorts shut down. Not so with Buccament Bay. Bookings justify the Resort staying fully open during this time.
Buccament Bay is a global product. At present, occupancy is being generated by bookings primarily from the UK market which constitutes no more than 20% of Buccament Bay’s global reach. Marketing has increased in the US and worldwide with expectation that the global market will dwarf the UK occupancy in years to come in line with further construction at Buccament Bay and the opening of the international airport.
SVG – Argyle Airport. The airport project is also making progress – but has its own set of issues to resolve, money being just one of them. Take a look at the IADC reports on http://www.svgiadc.com for the latest Project Update (under “Development” tab). YouTube is also a good source of updates.
In amongst all the Harlequin hiatus we all need to remember that Buccament Bay and the airport need each other to maximise success. Without the airport there is little, if anything, to be gained by charging ahead with the full build out of Buccament Bay as it can’t be filled and therefore can’t achieve the income without the ability to fly visitors in and out in large volumes. So with the airport project experiencing delays to completion, current forecasts are for it being open to airlines in late 2014. Harlequin delays are just running in parallel. Both projects need to converge for the success of both.
http://www.United2Succeed.org.uk – just a little something else we’ve been working on, which contains information provided by Harlequin. We have uploaded a substantial volume of information about most of the resorts over the holiday period. If you haven’t had a look recently, please log on and take a look. Of immediate interest are a series of documents regarding legal title and planning for Buccament Bay. We have similar information for most of the other resorts as well, with more to come – all to help PHIG investors with their ongoing Due Diligence in the project. Many thanks to Harlequin for providing this information to PHIG.
I found this recent post on the RL site…..it makes grim and worrying reading as to the safety of those staying at Buccament Bay?………………………………………..We have been monitoring and taking photos of the progress of the Buccament Bay resort since 2010. The deterioration in the unfinished elements of the resort is of huge concern. We are fully aware that no maintenance is being carried out at the resort. The atmosphere is highly corrosive and doors, windows, shutters and decking etc are being damaged beyond repair as a result of the lack of maintenance.
The resort has also been probed by the local chief medical officer. For a time raw sewage was being pumped out about 100 mts out to sea while guests slept. Water sampling by the Chief Medical Officer showed a reduction in the water quality in Buccament Bay as a result.
We have heard much about the aquatic delights to be experienced at Buccament Bay. What the Ames family may have forgotten to tell us is that Buccament Bay is of huge bio aquatic importance, it is one of the few locations where Hammer head sharks come every year to breed. The drop in water quality of this unique aquatic environment may some day soon drive the sharks away. The unique Tre Tre fishery, once an amazing site has been all but wiped out as a result of the security lighting at the resort.
What guests may also not know is that the Restaurants, some Cabanas and Apartment blocks have been built over an ancient Carib Indian grave site and village. During the construction, a number of mummified remains of mothers and their babies were discovered and archaeologists were engaged to document the site and the finds. Much of this unique historical insight was stored at Buccament Bay but was destroyed by the Ames family in a bid to destroy evidence in the court cases against the builder.
In 2007 the ministry of health discovered that the mosquito population at Buccament Bay was a species that carried the Dengue Fever.
Ridge View the initial contractor on the Buccament Bay site began a policy of monthly fogging of the whole area in a bid to control the mosquito population. ICE group continued the program which had to extend beyond the boundaries of the resort to be affective.
Harlequin have however not maintained this program due to budgetary constraints. In addition the fish stocks in the ponds have not been maintained which originally had the desired affect of controlling the mosquito larvae.
The resort is surrounded on the land sides by the velvet bean plant (cowitch). The seeds of this plant cause severe itching. During the construction phase of the project a dedicated team was assigned to control this prolific and evasive plant. Our photos show that this plant has taken root in many areas of the unfinished resort.
The resort does not have adequate fire fighting facilities nor a centralised fire monitoring facility. There are no hydrants or pumping facilities on the resort.
The initial planning consent required that Harlequin provide its own fire tender in order to deal with any potential fire at the resort. The nearest fire station is in Kingstown 35 minutes away and does not have an appliance to deal with a fire on the 5th floor of the apartment block. The apartment block is neither fitted with a sprinkler system nor an adequate fire alarm or fire protection system. The same applies to the rest of the resort including the restaurant areas. The standards fall far below what is required for a 5 star resort. Further more it does not even meet local fire officer codes.
We wonder if Mr. Walton addressed many of these issues in his report.
Another Anonymous (not the above)
And they (investors) still believe in some sort of “rescue plan”.
You did not even get into what the imported sand has done to
the mangrove fishery breeding beds. The whole bloody place
is an ecological disaster.
From the latest TA review: “The resort is showing it’s wear and needed’s to
watch the little things. It was hard to find towels at pool and was mostly out and the unbella’s were broken and some had mold. Only had bath towels in our room 3 out of 7 days of our stay.”
Some 5 star resort!
I don’t give a toss about a couple of poor little fishes, I think you have just made it all up.
£400million has been flushed somewhere!!!!
Have you any proof ? it’s time to show it
More on this later………………………
I know nothing should surprise me about the Ames family, but Dave being a Lothario of the Caribbean – That’s like saying Erica’s arse looks like Kylie Minogue’s in hot pants.
@Dirk Diggler, you do know you came to a sticky end in Boogie Nights.
@ Anon 7.54 for gods sake Erica give it a rest. You posted this as worried investor on RL. PROOF. Erica where is your PROOF?
Bobby – Your last tirade just inspired me to get GreenPeace
involved. God knows over the years I have given them enough
money. And no: I am not Erica.
I find things terribly confusing.
If £400m was taken, let’s assume (at LEAST) £100m is owed in deposit refunds contractually (Harlequin and FDRM seem ignorant of the fact that contractual deadlines are legally binding – although, admittedly, Harlequin contracts are cowboy toilet paper).
That means at LEAST £300m was wasted (defrauded) by Harlequin, but that’s not my point here.
Are all those professing about a ‘rescue’ deal including in that deal the refund of at LEAST £100m to investors who are owed it and want out? I think those prophets actually expect ALL investors to either write off their investment (oh really???), or invest even more money so that Dave Ames can be bought out/so that his bullshit dream can float a little longer.
Can somebody please explain WTF this ‘rescue’ plan actually is? (Apart from a way for Ames to string his shit out further, and for the cash pot to be diminished further)?
I think the ‘professionals’ are being trusted and believed by the ignorant so that the situation is actually being made worse. Apart from some minuscule resort in the little, as yet, undeveloped, Island of SVG, there is absolutely NOTHING to be rescued. Unless investors want to pour in SHIT loads of money, no more development will happen. THERE IS NO MONEY LEFT!
WTF is all this negotiation with Ames for? To ask him whether he agrees to more investor funds to be invested and what portion of that he will accept before pissing off?
I have no idea what the objective is now. What is the aim of the rescue deal? To buy Ames out and get investors to pour more money in to buy 100 units on a building site in SVG?
Brilliant idea. I’d pay for that advice (if I was as thick as Bob Storey).
and lots of raw sewage spewing out of a lot of bungholes’ mouths on this blog…SEPTIC TANKS….”raw sewage was being pumped out about 100 mts out to sea while guests slept. Water sampling by the Chief Medical Officer showed a reduction in the water quality in Buccament Bay…”
Ridiculous. There is indeed nothing to rescue, one massive loss making resort in SVG and one little dive that loses money in SLU. Plus lots of very average land in various islands. Liquidation is the only way to get anything out. Whilst GF’s latest post makes sense, it is about a year late. What was he doing in the meantime? Do people really need further proof that Ames does not care about investors, or that he is a scam artist? Is selling properties on land he does not own, nor have permission, nor start building and continually lie on record for so many years not enough? You need more proof???? The fact he is loaded when he started this off broke, and investors have nothing does not show where his priorities lie? The whole thing is absurd, and then you have people spending so much time arguing about who is who on an anonymous site and missing the point entirely. Liquidate and get some money back, or wait and get none. Rescue plan will get you zero back, it will just take another 10 years to realise you have nothing of any value. What a total farce this has always been and continues to be. Lots of people were conned and someone needs to go to jail.
Isn’t this where we came in? Plus ça change…
@ARU well you have just poved you are thick with your post above. I could explain it to you, but I cannot be bothered as you have just admitted you would not understand.
…plus c’est la meme chose.
A new phrase has been coined –
“The Mattvent Calendar” – like a Christmas Advent Calendar.
We have loaded it up with 30 presents and will remove one from each door, each day.
DAY – 16 Dad’s D- Day.
Mum doesn’t want Dad agreeing to all these poor peoples requests for help, securing their investment on ‘OUR ASSET’
If he agrees, she will start to speak to him again, and he really doesn’t want that….. .
The think Dad fears above all else is not being able to fly all round the world to get away from ‘Waterbed Wife’
When Mr. Ames dumped Mr. Ghent I doubt ever believed this would make it childs play to follow him, even take the odd compromising photograph.
Mr Ghent was just another person to whom he owed money and did not want to pay, £6000 wasn’t it?
More to follow…… No pun intended.
Or another point to ponder for the Ames family.
Now you no longer sweep the office for bugging devices, could we be listening!!!
How do you know your telephone system is not being compromised?
After all the vacant offices you used for your security protection could be used again?
A million spent on security tut tut, just to feel important.
Or maybe Bro. Leaky Leaky Squeaky mole in the bunker
Is not actually a person in your office?
Just sayin 😉
http://www.eyetek.co.uk/listening-devices
”Do unto others as you would have them do to you”
So, ‘Dirty Dibber Dave’ that’s exactly what we are doing to you, following you,bugging, photographing the results are amazing.
Next we will be taking all your money off you and your family.
More to follow…….
An eye for an eye
Leaky and others have proven many times that they are not insiders.
Why would someone in the establishment want to prove they were an actual leak – that’s a little silly.
Also, bugging devices don’t have an opinion.
Anyway, should you not be back at BB on your buggy?
Squeaky Simon Terry would be a good place to start.
Dave’s little love nest on Barbados where his concubine is set up…. maybe a name will be given on Friday 13th
WORRIED INVESTOR STOP BULLSHITTING AND SHOW YOUR HAND ITS GETTING BORING. SHOW US THE INFO WE NEED TO SEE
@Anonymous Any person who speaks out against Ames is a bullshitter or a thief.
Ames started with nothing, took 400 million, paid 200 million in commissions. Took over 20 million for himself. Spent 20 million on legal fees. Built nothing. Blames everyone else.
Never publishes accounts or any details yet you call one person who is trying to get their money back a bullshitter?
Says it all really.
red monkey….so whats the address of the barbados love nest…just returned from barbados and back again soon, so maybe wanna check it out
there is an apratment at One Sandy Lane is on the market, maybe this is Daves pad, after all with £400 million he would fall into their potential client list
And so the world still waits for Ralph to show where Ames admitted that the companies were all insolvent.
Notice how quiet is is on here now that “Ralph” has morphed into Erica on RL
It’s quiet because of the absolute crap you ( Bob) and others write as a excuses for comments on a very serious matter.
I think its right people stop commenting untill the Fatchett / Ames announcement tomorrow . Once we get the full details of the new package I am sure everyone will be commenting like crazy. Good luck for tomorrow Gareth and thank you for all your efforts ,They have and will continue to be a big help to me .
Could Ames’s lady friend in Barbados be the one that was said to be selling for cash, building supplies up at Merricks?
“Designing” women have been many a mans downfall…
Mr. Ames is something of an unlikely sex machine, This lady could be described as one on Mr Ames has jiggled.
But not the one he set up in a cosy little love nest.
@Ralph’s
Do you have any update on the Nikki freezing order?
Bob & Erica can you both stop filling up the RL site with petty fights we are all getting bored with you both. Erica Bob is displaying obsessive tendencies, don’t make him worse.
Is this the calm before the storm?
The great news investors sought will come at 17.00 hrs tomorrow night. Finally there is light at the end of the tunnel.
But within days the elation will be replaced by the knowledge that investors will have lost almost everything. Ironically the Ames family will be the primary beneficiaries.
The Pied Piper of Birmingham is leading his children over the cliffs, and in their innocence they do not even realise this.
The Pied Piper grossly neglected his children by biting off more then he could chew.
This is not a case of the blind leading the blind. It is a case of the greedy leading the gullible.
Once the truth dawns on everyone, many will wish that the Pied Piper joins Ames in the Fiery Pit of Hell itself.
The Pied Piper in his quest for Glory, will single handedly destroy the confidence entrusted in him by his children, and those who seek redress and justice.
There will never be justice in this case, the Cowardly Pied Piper has already sold his soul to Ames.
@The Oracle, and what makes you so certain?
The Devil will be in the Detail. The Pied Piper will have obtained for his Children what is already rightfully theirs.
But nothing more. A pyrrhic victory some might say. A stroke of genius on the part of Ames.
A massive dilution of the children’s rightful inheritance. A massive devaluation of the assets. And to the Victor go the spoils.
Who in all this is least trusted, but who as a result, of this slight of hand, will retain the title of Chancery of the Exchequer.
The deal must be scrutinised before popping the Champagne Corks. The Pied Piper is betting on the ignorance and innocence of the children. This is the Pied Piper’s personal escape plan. The Pied Piper has been out foxed by his nemesis, through the Pied Piper’s complete ignorance of international and Caribbean Law. And sadly the Pied Piper knows this only too well.
Indeed there may well be a “plan” late tomorrow. But in all
honesty how do you commit to a “plan” ( and the commitment
may be legally binding) when there are NO audited books – nay
there are no books period. Proceed cautiously my friends.
The inside of a Vincentian gaol for Mr Ames would be my plan.
Beware of the wind that will blow in from the Subcontinent. Tiss sadly an ill wind that will blow no good.
And when the wind abates, be not the one who shall drink from the poisoned chalice.
The Pied Piper has already drunk from the Cantarella, deadly poison of the Borgia.
The Maharaj will share his Gold with the current Chancery of the Exchequer. The custodian of the keys to the Harlequin vaults will not be passed over to the Pied Piper.
And therein lies the sting in the tail for the Children of the Pied Piper. The Pied Piper has already received his 30 pieces of Silver.
The rescue plan is in essence a plan to save the reputation of the Pied Piper in the eyes of the innocent but gullible Children.
I prefer my “plan” — a hot, urine reeking, stale body-odored,
cramped cell with some of SVG’s finest. I hear that the meals
are not very good either………..
I strongly disagree Anon. Why should he get to stay at Buccament Bay?
Sid – You got me there……but what I had in mind is much less
than a (self-awarded 5-Star) deteriorating beach shack.
I’m always cynical about why 5pm on a Friday is chosen to make an announcement.
Jon Austin of the Echo was in court for the Matt Ames hearing and the details miraculously appeared on BFP almost immediately.
Jeremy Newman must have some money left to receive service like that from Jon.
@ The Oracal AKA Ralph
What’s up Ralph don’t like the thought of a rescue plan, I wonder why?
By the way how did you get on with the big important IP meeting in London, settle on a fee did you?
No he is an Award Winning journalist, that’s what they do.
A new phrase has been coined –
“The Mattvent Calendar” – like a Christmas Advent Calendar.
We have loaded it up with 30 presents and will remove one from each door, each day.
DAY – 17 Dad’s Lost his Mojo
Dad confided in me regarding his ‘missing mojo’, The last visit to his concubine in ‘Bunga Bunga Bungalow Barbados’ So he just settled for the nipple clamps.
Can anyone help him find it?
Award winning journalists get paid by Jeremy Newman for info? Interesting.
But not surprising. Funny how Jon’s exposes have dried up for a while.
@Fatchett does not represent me. BUT COULD BE SOON.
Wii you change your name if this happens? 😉
Tell me who’s that writin’? Jon the Revelator
Tell me who’s that writin’? Jon the Revelator
Tell me who’s that writin’? Jon the Revelator
The meeting went very well thank you. No we are not the Oracle or Worried Investor or Mr. Newman.
We are fully aware of what is happening. We do however think it is time to let Mr. Fatchett make his announcement later.
We will then respond accordingly.
The collective Ralph’s do not want any rescue plan to work, that is abundantly clear.
We can suspect they have been wronged by Ames and want revenge; I also believe they are being financed by O’ Halloran; they include the likes of Erica Broughton and other fanatics hell-bent on the destruction of all thing’s Harlequin.
I am an investor but more pragmatic in my approach.
It’s the end for Ames; he is not talking to Gareth Fatchett because he wants to; he has simply been out maneuvered.
Fatchett is the only solicitor that’s is still going after Ames, the costs so far for RL must be considerable. Their payday will come, and rightly so.
Ralph want’s a liquidation plain and simple; this could be for the ‘finders fee’ or because of the well know court case, or just revenge.
I for one would prefer a rescue package and if that fails the only other option is liquidation, but not by a bunch of misguided Internet trolls.
So Ralph what are you so happy about today that told us you would be two weeks ago?
Have you pinned everything on you and Paudie O’Halloran converting Fatchett?
FDNRM have you noticed how Ralph is far more low key these days? Almost as if he realises his lies and hyperbole are catching up with him.
@TS, well it looks like they backed the wrong horse!
Expect a backlash if any agreement is made, they will turn on GF.
So, so predictable.
Karma I imagine we will see much more advertising for that very strange woman Nikki Crozier.
@TS as I said the other day, Ralph has morphed into Erica on the RL site. Ralph exposed his corrupted excel spread sheet which unfortunately, although I did warn him. GF swallowed hook line and sinker. Now we have Erica, who admits she has no investment in BB rabbiting on about sharks and Crib Indians. With, I hasten to add, not the slightest proof of her ramblings. She did say she was open and honest and would answer all questions. Well I fired 2 off to her and guess what?, nowt. They just kept spinning and spinning until they spun into each other. Could the Ralphs be Tony Blair supporters?
@Isabelo Cuevas-Ferrer
With you on that
@ TS in the whole scheme of things she is not important, unless you are Dave Ames, freezing orders won’t make him happy.
A few more tabs have been added to the RL site.
Erm….
As we stated we will let RL and GF make their announcement. Once the announcement is made we will revert back to all.
We would hope that GF makes the right decision for investors and not just for the SIPP investors. GF you understand what we are saying.
Ralph you did not say why you are so happy today? You seem a bit down in the dumps?
You popus prick Ralph, liquidation helps everyone aye?
Ralph anti rescue
Oh Dear Ralph, Erica.
What if a deal is done, that will spoil your weekend. All those big long nasty blogs you written. All those naughty spreadsheets.
If they don’t come to a deal you can knock one out with the prospect of liquidation. 😉
Erica, do you still have that picture of Gareth you put on your silly blog? The one where you replaced Noel Edmonds Head with Gareths?
We are not down in the dumps. We are however genuinely sad for the 3,000 or so investors who will realise that they will loose most if not everything.
The SIPP investors will have redress. That’s it.
GF knows this, we know this and sadly TS knows this too. Oh yes and Ames will receive a Golden Handshake for his troubles.
Absolutely disgusting. So let us wait for 17.00.
Ralph after making a lot of noise you have been exposed AGAIN as a liar so now might be the time to give up. Nobody cares about you anymore not even the Anons of this world.
This is a bit like transfer deadline day …
4hrs 15 mins to go.
@Ralph,
I you would do WHAT? Smart arse. You have never come up with a vial plan other that you obvious liquidation, for you own vengeful reasons. You don’t want it to work plain and simple – you want Ames shut down.
@Tubby
That’s on a good day, Liat got an award same company that gave BB one.
Ames won’t bend over for GF, he too old 😉
What choice does he have ?
He will do it just to upset Ralph and to give Bob the fantasy he needs to see the weekend through.
Matt seems to be doing a great job at BB…even good reviews of the resort are spoiled by comments about his and his childrens’s behavior.
From latest review : “I agree with most of the other reviews but the one thing that spoilt it for us – (I have seen the other review from Leatherhead mentioning the same thing). The son of the owner shouting at one of the chefs when we were having our meal. It was very unprofessional. The staff and chefs are the best thing about the place. So not the best way forward. In fact why were the son’s children allowed to run riot in the place? arguing with paying customer’s children and even spotted punching another child. But this is to be expected from the children if they follow in their parents steps. Shouting across the pool at the children by the mother and stomping off was made very public to us all. “
Spoiled pretentious brats
Could Harlequin and your jobs only have a couple of hours left, go and ask uncle Dave.
This could be the end of your jobs, did you ask him? – I know you all read this
Friday the 13th an all.
If he doesn’t go with the plan, it will be game over for all you lot 😉
No more Bunga Bunga for Dirty Dave
2 hours to the end of Harlequin tick tock watch the clock
1.5 hours to no jobs tick, tock, watch the clock, don’t trust Dirty Dave 😉
I don’t want any of the HP scum to have a job.
There aren’t any HP staff now you moron.
Dan Daligan? Kim Fry, the solicitors, Settings family? travel side, etc
Moron!!!
One hour………… to the demise of Harlequin!!
Earth to earth
Ashes to ashes
Dust to dust
The bell tolls for thee
I hear a rumour that GF has totally cocked this up. And he along with Ames are both now in the cross hairs.
Whatever happens today nothing will really happen. Ames will agree so GF will tell us, GF will tell us that Ames will need more time 2-4 weeks to provide GF with all investor details. GF will tell us that all Units are going to be held by an SPV.
blah blah blah.
But will GF tell investors that “All” assets will be held by the SPV ? Or just some. ? Now that is the million dollar question. The answer in 47 minutes.
@TS put him right will you.
Where is Erica with one of her youTube clips, The Final Countdown?, 5,4,3,2,1 ? Pick up the pieces? I feel a new CD coming on.
HP is in administration you utter imbecile. There is more than one Harlequin company.
It’s “Stenning” family not “Settings”. Lambs (non SIPP investors) to the Slaughter my friends.
@Anon, and who’s cross hairs would that be then. Are Ralph and Erica pacing the floor, fingers poised over the “post comment” button? Where is Red Button Girl? Are all the shutters closed in Basildon waiting the nuclear strike? Could this be where the Russians are suggesting the Syrian chemical weapons will be sent? So many questions.
Ha ha ha FDNRM you are a complete fucking idiot. You and TS. You really have not got a clue have you. Jeez ha ha ha. Pathetic. There are loads out there who loath and despise Ames. Leave this to the guys with the brains.
Fuck off you Ape. Ha ha ha
@Anon, and that posting is from someone with a brain? Hay Ho.
TS aka Matt, what’s up don’t like being in a corner? You need to control those little shits of yours at BB
@TS, very soon, very soon, there will be a power slide and you Matt will not be required at BB – your not doing a very good job.
BB needs a proper manager
Well I’ve reappeared from under my desk, has the nuclear strike passed me by? Are Ralph and Erica still pacing the boards, waiting to come to the rescue/demise of the world as we know it?
Well Erica happy weekend to you and your Irish loverboy; I expect attacks on the Wonderful Gareth next – you nasty, evil bitter, and twisted bunch collectively known as ‘Ralph’
Harlequin & Regulatory Legal Solicitors have agreed, in principle, to a process that will lead to investors as members of a trust, holding security against the land title, excluding sub-divided investor plots, at Buccament Bay.
It is anticipated that the legal structure of the security arrangement will be executed before the end of October 2013.
In order for investors to secure their investment, Harlequin & Regulatory Legal Solicitors would urge all Buccament Bay investors to entertain this plan and become involved as a member of the trust.
Harlequin & Regulatory Legal Solicitors will fully explain the security arrangement to clients soon. Details of the process will also be published on http://www.harlequininvestorgroup.co.uk.
@FDNRM – what do you think of the latest news?
I bet the anti Harlequin bunch are chocking on their dinner.
Ralph any word of encouragement?
YOU AINT GETTIN DICK !
Please elaborate.
I bet there is frantic ironing going on tonight. Something is going to get the brunt of all that frustration.
Does this include land leased to Harlequin (not sold) by Malcom Punnett?
Should be interesting if that is the case.
So I am Matt again now? Good to know. I wish I had been at Buccament but alas I have my own job.
So Friday has passed without a catastrophic event and Ralph and his couple of followers once again look like lying, clueless fools.
WINWHBT – could please you explain what difference this ‘announcement’ makes?
Does it mean construction will recommence (currently it seems only circa 100 investors have a unit)?
Does it mean interest payments will recommence?
Will investors who were due to be receiving returns on their investments years ago now receive those returns?
Does it mean money will be generated to subsidise the running of the award winning buccament bay?
Does it mean the outside investment Ames has been promising for over 5 years will come in?
Does it mean all the thousands of Harlequin investors in other resorts have been rescued?
We know Ames benefits from this, as maybe some investors who were going to take legal action to recover their investment may decide not to (I’ve no idea why either), but can you explain who else benefits and why?
I don’t see what a jot of difference this makes to the situation investors are in.
My definition of a Ponzi scheme: Invest in Merricks Barbados,
Have that money used for Buccament Bay. Form an investor
trust for those who had invested in Buccament Bay. Would I
have the legal standing to “claw-back” my investment?
Ponzi – through and through. Looks like all investors are not
equal.
Anonymous, do the same in Merricks use BB at a ‘test’?
Anon reasons why you are a negative git? I have no idea pillock
Evening Folks. So at last something for investors to cling on to. ?
Where to start. Ames is giving security to 19.05 acres of Buccament Bay not including the Subdivided Plots. They are the plots on which the units have been built. So no security over them.
The security is over the common areas. That is the pathways and the ponds, the ICE Cream shop and the yet to be opened or completed Trader Vics.
What is not covered is the following.
All the Cabanas, the Apartment blocks, the Tennis Courts, Football Pitches, Cricket Grounds, Spa Island, a further 14 acres of the resort, the swimming pool, Bay View Restaurant, Jacks Restaurant, Kitchens, Surf and Turf Restaraunt. Current Gym and Spa, Indian Restaraunt, Kids Club, Reception and back of house.
Wow the investors are so lucky.
You can fool some of the people some of the time
But you can’t fool all of the people all of the time.
Ralph as you well know being rational and sentient is not
requisite to posting on here. Thanks for the hard, cold reality!
rearranging the deckchairs on the Titanic
As sure as night follows day, anonymous posts after Ralph. Only a 4 min gap. Do you both use the same computer?
Fatchett got nothing. He has yet to receive a legally binding mortgage document, but aside from that investors now have a charge over the ponds, ( what is Fatchett going to do, threaten to stop feeding the fish if Ames does not pay him? Sell the ponds to the Bank or Seven Capital? ).
He hopes to get security over the Pathways. ( This does not include the bridge by the way), Purchasers already have a right of way on the paths. What’s he going to do? If Ames does not pay, take them over, then be left having to insure them because of the right of way issue. Maintain them at investors costs.
He could seize the Ice Cream shop and sell it for 200 million.
What does Ames get. A reduced threat of legal action, complete freedom to do as he so wishes with the funds raised from the completions, revenues from the restaurants,
He can continue as normal.
What does Fatchett get ? A list of current investors with specific reference to the SIPP holders. New clients perhaps, nice little earner back in blighty.
Bobby – I don’t know about the other anonymouses but I am in
Santo Domingo at the moment.
Is that a district of Wigan lol
What an amoral evil little loser you are. All you are saying is
“I got mine so f*ck you everybody else”
Is that aimed at me? What are you talking about. How can I be a “loser” if I got mine?
Bobby I can see that the cheap celebratory bubbly has gone to
your head. Please don’t litter when you throw away the box…
Yeah, sure you have Bob. Twat.
A shit load of your money has gone down the toilet. Please keep flushing. It’s funny.
He can’t be all you describe, Anonymous 6:41pm. He’s far far too simple to be deviously calculating. He’s just conman’s loyal dunce. Like a dog. But less useful. And nowhere near as intelligent.
@Anon RU, Did someone turn over your rock so you could crawl out? You think a “shit load of my money has gone down the toilet”? I wish you lot would make your minds up? Loser or winner? You have no idea have you. Now you crawl back under your rock and disappear for another few weeks until the tide goes out again.
I want to make sure our leader Mr Ames gets the proper representation on the Trustee board – I must be considered; I have some great ideas.
1. A full size statue gold must be located in the entrerance area to each resort all guest must bow, throwing shoes at his is not permitted.
2. A life size oil painting in each unit of our leader Mr Ames
3. Buccament Bay is to be renamed, Bunga Bunga Bonking Bay
I have many more great plans
More to follow…….
I have been looking at the rescue package as it appears from RL and the update from Dave Ames. I think it is time that the authorities now stepped in. This deal offers no security for investors. It gives security over the common areas only. Ponds, Roadways and public green spaces.
Secondly it is illegal and when tested will be overturned by both the liquidator and the Prime Minister of St. Vincent.
Ames wants all investors to sign up to this. One has to wonder why Ames is encouraging all investors to sign up to this deal. It would have been far more credible had Ames reluctantly accepted this deal.
This is a sham designed I believe to dissuade investors from seeking alternative recourse for a return of their funds.
IT MUST BE A JOKE
Never heard about such a ridiculous deal, the security has more or less no value and is most likely impossible to enforce. Is this the only solution RL could provide over a period of 6 months? It must be a joke and nothing else.
If the trust which is controlled by the investors want security, you need to take control of all shares owned by Ames related to the various developments. Why is he allowed to continue at all?
Investors be careful to enter in to this deal, it is designed for disaster.
This latest development clearly has no substantive impact one way or another except perhaps to further emphasise (if any further emphasis were needed) that there is no chance whatsoever of this farcical enterprise ever developing into a viable business capable of offering a return to investors. Anyone viewing tonight’s news as particularly positive is clearly deluded, patently so.
I don’t get it. How exactly are we better off and what ‘security’ do we actually have? I won’t be jumping for joy until I read the fine print on what I am asked to sign up to. If it were a credible offer I would have expected RL to back it up with a full explanation selling the benefits of the deal. My first impression is that Ames is trying it on and RL are hoping everyone just assumes that any deal is a good deal. And it is only ‘in principle’ and won’t be finalised for another 7-8 weeks. I’m a sales director and use that term when I’m buying time. All pretty disappointing really and a bit of a slap in the face.
Next we’ll discover that members of the new trust will share liability and will have to raise another £100m to cover debts. Surely Fatchett could have said thanks but no thanks?
Well said Mr Lars, the voice of reason. And so this debacle will now linger on further…..He has obviously failed with the re structuring process and so what the hell is he still doing at the helm. What about us investors who have purchased elsewhere, he has failed us yet again.
Talk about oversell. Was that really it? I mean was that the restructure / rescue plan? That the BB investors own the ponds and paths? At least Ames is no longer responsible for weeding and mosquito spray I guess.
Let’s take a poll. How many of us/you would ask Fatchett
for legal advise. The man is surely not up to par. What’s his
reward?
Utter farce, noone with an ounce of business acumen will think this is worth anything. The legal representation and advice offered by GF has been highly unimpressive to be blunt. All talk of a rescue plan also a joke – investors have not seen the books for BB so they don’t know what they are rescuing and why. It certainly has been losing millions. What about the thousands of investors elsewhere? Only way out is liquidation, at least get something back, and let professionals come and see if they can preserve jobs for the vincy people. Ames should be long gone by now if proper lawyers were on the case, and law suits against him personally would be piling up and he would be on a sticky wicket with the law. Contracts breached, pay me back as per contract or I stat demand you and sue you personally as the director that is fraudulently holding my money and go after worldwide assets. Liquidate people, there is no other way. This security is worthless and if investors get sucked into this then there will be no sympathy thereafter.
Bobby – I would certainly hope that you think hard about what
anonymous/10:02 just wrote. Its over!
Ralphy boy Newman, Erica, Cozier with your 12 idiot clients give it up. You have been caught lying over and over. The rescue plan is here ha ha. Sore grapes. Ha ha. See you in court Ralphy boy, tick tock.ha ha, No liquidation, No SFO ha ha.
Bob Storey, you are a nonsense individual without moral compass or fabric. One of the world’s mistakes.
Yeah ……rescue plan . Wow . At last Investors will get some dosh from Ames and Co. Fantastic! I’m peeing meself with excitement
What a bunch of assholes!
“Sore grapes” Bob? Geez, you can’t even spell it! Looks like GF maybe protecting your pathways and ponds after all!
Gareth Fatchett needs to come up with answers fast. Ames is encouraging all investors to come on board. Fatchett is pure ambulance chasing scum.
Investors want their money back not ponds and a few paths. Fatchett is no better than Ames. Its time the SFO got off their arses and dealt with this.
Fatchett is complicit in the fraud. And protecting Ames. And Fatchett claims to be the only saviour of investors. Pay Fatchett and get security over a pond lily. Bullshit. Fatchett is pond life. Go to hell Fatchett and take Ames and your rescue plan with you.
THIS INVESTOR SAYS NO.
Dear all,
Harlequin & Regulatory Legal Solicitors have agreed, in principle, to a process that will lead to investors, as members of a trust, holding security against the land title, excluding sub-divided investor plots, at Buccament Bay Resort.
It is anticipated that the legal structure of the security arrangement will be executed before the end of October 2013.
In order for investors to secure their investment, Harlequin & Regulatory Legal Solicitors would urge all Buccament Bay Resort investors to entertain this plan and become involved as a member of the trust.
Harlequin & Regulatory Legal Solicitors will fully explain the security arrangement to clients soon.
At this initial stage, the security arrangement will only apply to the Buccament Bay Resort, but Harlequin has agreed to consider using similar arrangements for other projects in the Caribbean.
Sincerely,
Harlequin Hotels & Resorts
Fatchett bent as a two pound note. The crime that is the defrauding of thousands of people will not be washed away. GF, stand down or you too will be found complicit in this fraud. Ames will do down, if anyone else like FDNRM wants to go down with them, so be it. A crime has been committed, and it is fraud. Stanford got some 150 years, Madoff a lot more. Ames can share his out amongst the FDNRMs of this world, but it will see him out. Selling property on land you do not own, don’t have permission to build on, not adhering to terms of contract as relate to refund, proven lies about what you have built (that has not been built, like the marina), easily proven lies about ridiculous returns, not paying interest on loans as agreed, etc etc. Fraud, jail, do not pass go. This activity is illegal. GF, grow a pair or be known as a crook. Ultimately, there are victims, people whose lives are ruined. justice is all people want now, if not a return of some money.
Just saw GF wants to work with Ames and wants investors to agree to do so. This is as absurd and stupid as any suggestion can be. Ames, you are a thief. GF, you are a shit lawyer.
@Anon 11.06/12.14 that wasnt me who posted. Crozier has 13 followers. Therefor your comments are misdirected and not appreciated.
What a nice little deal. Fatchett and Ames want all investors at Buccament Bay to sign up to the deal. Very odd.
1. Do you have to be a fee paying client of Fatchett to sign up to the deal?
2. Why if Ames wants everyone to sign up to this too.
3. Indeed why need Fatchett any more if Ames seems so taken by the idea of a trust.
4. How much are the pathways and ponds worth?
5. Are they worth in the region of the £100 million sterling already paid by investors at Buccament Bay?
6. If not what are they worth ? 2 million ? 4 million ? 2-4 % of the money paid ?.
7. How would Fatchett propose to liquidate the “Assets” (the ponds and pathways) in the event that Ames defaults. ?
8. Can Fatchett state categorically that his trust ie the preferential creditor status will stand up to scrutiny by a possible liquidator ?
9. Can Fatchett state categorically that his “client” the owner of 7 capital, has not expressed an interest in purchasing the common areas not covered by the proposed trust ie the restaurants, bars, swimming pools, tennis courts, football pitches, spa, gym etc?
10. Can Fatchett state why the report on Buccament Bay had not yet been made public?
11. Gareth Fatchett and RL state that they have found evidence of double selling of units at Buccament Bay, in essence evidence of Fraudulent activity on the part of Harlequin. What does he propose to do about this. ?
Regarding your point 5., all Harlequin investors’ cash has been spent on BB.
Oh Dear Ralph seems to have more ID’s than ever before how predictable.
Sid has a fair point, lets wait and see what the small print says, it’s amazing how much information people make up to fill in the blanks and get evryone into a tizzy about things.
It appears our numbers may have grown.
Ok let us take the suggestion by SID to wait for the small print. How long do we wait?
6 weeks – 10 weeks.
Earlier on the HIG site an investor asked about her studio apartment and wanted to know if her apartment was included in the plots not included in the investor security package. RL stated “NO” they were not. Block 1 which only has a foundation and Block 2 which is still not complete are the only blocks within the 19.05 acres.
So if the investor owns their apartment in block 3, 4, 5 & 6 these are not within the 19.05 acres.
RL and Fatchett were quite happy to intimate to this particular investor that her apartment was covered under the trust or mortgage yet have not ascertained from the investor exactly where her apartment is.
RL and Fatchett have stated that the security or mortgage will not cover the first 50 or so units but covers everything else.
So why don’t they upload the drawing they have of Buccament Bay and state in unambiguous terms the areas and units within the 19.05 acres that the mortgage or charge will cover.
See it makes no sense, given that Harlequin quite clearly state that the investor trust will give potential financiers comfort yet RL state that the trust will have some legal charge over everything with the exception of the 1st 50 units.
So where will the financiers obtain their security from.
didums upset that your liquidation plan failed?
@Ralph.
From one Ralph to another.
You have been asked many times but refuse to answer- what with all you wisdom do YOU recommend?
Gareth we will pull back for a couple of days from making further comment on this forum.
Could RL and Paul Walton also desist from discussing the plan until such time as you are in a position to state categorically what the investors will be getting as security.
I have some great ideas and must to be on the Board of Trustees.I must see our glorious leader represented.
1. A full size solid gold statue of Mr Ames, our founder; at the entrance of each resort – guests must to him bow when entering the resort.
2. I will produce a new CD and this must be played 24/7
3. Each Cabana must have a full size bird table
4 Matt must be allowed to keep his parking space
5. His children can still be naughty
@Ralph
What about an answer to my question? What would you do Liquidation, of course for your golden handshake 😉
@Paul Walton, could you please (my word for politeness) desist in having any opinion different to Ralphs. Saying anything that Ralph doesn’t like will result in your personal details being exposed on here. Now Paul go and sit in a dark corner by yourself until Ralph lets you out.
NO SUBSTANCE IN FATCHETTS DEAL
I have no idea how and why RL negotiated the deal to secure part of the land but there is no substance in the deal whatsoever. In order for Harlequin investors to have any chance of getting money back in one way or another they cannot sign up to this catastrophic deal. It is definitely designed for disaster. You should ask Fatchett what legal representation he has in St Vincent and the Grenadines and who is the surveyor . I would suggest that a valuation is done by two individual valuators on the proposed land before you took one step further. In order to secure land you must have a deed. Where is the deed for the proposed security?
This proposal is designed to stall all further possibilities to recover anything on behalf of the investors.
I have no idea if, or how much investors are paying to RL for legal representation, but so far you have gained nothing of value, just an opportunity for Ames to keep going for a few more months.
Mr Lars, you said it yourself – you have no idea 🙂
Nobody has see any details of anything; stop speculating on something you know nothing about.
All bloody experts!
@ Ralph come on mate answer the question or I will have to tell you off in CAPITAL LETTERS
Before you say it Mr Lars, we have all seen your long winded ramblings about how well connected you are, boring boring.
Dave Ames could say the same and look where that got us!
I am so excited about getting involved as a Trustee, so many ideas, so little time!!!!
You know Dubai, how they made an island that can be seen from space in the shape of a palm? Well this is my plan it’s fab.
We extend the beach at Buccament Bay in the shape of a plastic Champagne glass – just to add a bit of class to this award winning resort.
More to follow…….
With respect, too many decisions and comments have been made without any local resort, real estate or legal knowledge, and look where that has got you. Mr Lars is giving good free advice. Locally, we have known this was doomed since 2006, people should actually do some local research before making decisions 4000 miles away. This is doomed to drag on without producing any profits if investors pump more money in, but the outcome ultimately is the same as forecast by many 7 years ago. Negative maybe, but reality.
That’s it then close the resort.
OMMON SENSE AND EXPERIENCE
I have significant experience from good and bad times operating a business in St Vincent. As Anon73 just said I am giving you free advice, it has nothing to do with being well connected or not. I have experienced all aspects of real estate transactions, developments and the potential legal consequences including liquidation/receivership.
If you think you have any idea of how the legal system works here based on some UK lawyers strategies and decisions 4000 miles away. Take a deep breath and rethink. .
You have to be in to win it.
No, change the plans and bring in a manager/management company that knows what it is doing. Whilst Harlequin/Ames is there, will not work financially Definition of insanity is to do the same thing over again and expect different results. Not going to work as is and as is planned.
@RALPH, WHAT’S YOUR PLAN THEN? APART FROM YOUR IP MATE IN LONDON
Dear Mr. Fatchett,
You have absolutely no understanding of the ways of the Caribbean or indeed St. Vincent.
Any purchaser who has paid money even as a deposit for land in St. Vincent already has a legal claim on the land.
You do not understand St. Vincent law nor have you studied it. The firm of Williams and Williams should be in a position to explain this to you.
You have also been made fully aware that any proposed rescue plan will have to include all local unsecured creditors. There is absolutely no way that the Prime Minister of St. Vincent will approve any such rescue plan that does not involve local creditors.
You state in your latest letter that Barbados Free Press is not representative of investors views and that is possibly very true, but is a conduit looked at by many with a keen interest on topics that affect the region.
Mr. Ames is utterly despised by most in the region.
The announcement of your rescue plan will be mentioned in the Parliament in St. Vincent. Lawyers representing third party unsecured creditors in Barbados are now looking to seek a charge on the land at Merricks.
Your rescue plan will now be scrutinised by many. It is apparent to most in the region that the rescue plan is nothing but a very poor attempt at trying to legitimise the Harlequin operations in the eyes of it’s UK investors.
Whilst you believe that your opinion because of your status as a UK citizen counts above those of us in the region, we must remind you that the days of colonial rule on these Islands is over.
Any plan which will give UK based unsecured creditors preference over local unsecured creditors will never work, and already moves are being made to highlight what is being seen by many as an attempt to legitimise the past missed deeds and fraudulent actions of Harlequin by your good self.
You may be able to sweet talk your way into convincing UK investors that you are acting in their best interests, by offering them a charge over 7 mosquito infested ponds and a few public pathways. But we in the Caribbean are neither gullible or stupid. Do not underestimate the people of the Caribbean.
Hello Ralph or is it Dave Mann on duty today?
A rescue plan ? In a letter from RL this evening we are now being asked if we want the Ames family still involved? Whether we want a rescue plan? Whether we are prepared to pay legal costs, land survey costs etc.?
Why should we pay for land surveys? Why should we keep paying for what is ours ?
It smells like GF is ambulance chasing here. Why was the survey carried out sooner ? And who is Fatchett representing ?
Survey to be complete by 20th of October…….
Its time to Stop The Con. Its time the authorities moved in.
A report from The Basildon Echo
http://www.basildonrecorder.co.uk/news/10675154.Deal_hoped_to_save_hundreds_of_Harlequin_Property_clients__investments_on_the_table/
Anony, do you want it all for free?
Or maybe liquidation is a better option, at least the the IP company will take the millions of fees out of the asset, what a good plan!
Only downside you won’t get much back.
Nowt as strange a folk
You had to be pretty stupid to invest in the Ames scam in the first place, but you would have to be certifiable to go along with anything that involves Ames now having proven his incompetence and his crookedness and lying ways over many years. Very bizarre approach from this lawyer, terrible advice.
What a missed opportunity, Harlequin could have been held to account for their exaggerated claims and the structural flaws of the business. It could have been examined by independent experts who understand tourism in The Caribbean and advice obtained as to the best way of going forward with an achievable goal and a product that would actually attract clients.
Instead it’s full steam ahead with the same old plan, with the same old people at the helm, obsessed with building some ludicrous mega resort, the demand for which no shred of evidence supports. Statement such as “Buccama Bay … has seen average room rates from tour operators increase from around US$350 (£226) per night on opening, to £591 per night.” could have been investigated and the records on occupancy and rates revealed to investors so that at least they would have some definite information to inform their decisions. Instead it’s just more vague promises – does anyone believe that “The resort has now been independently valued at approximately £155million based on an inspection in July 2011…” What is an accurate current valuation – who knows?
Coincidentally it seems that Sandals is buying the old Almond Beach Village on Barbados and will market it under its Beaches family friendly brand. It will be a direct competitor to Buccament Bay and will be interesting to see how the two fair when compared.
@BB I agree, however, could this not be the first weakening in Harlequins Armour? Then the other resorts, after that……………. why do you need Ames?
This could be part of a much bigger plan?
I have been told from a very reliable source that Gareth Fatchett has experience in running a B&B.
Harlequin announces new investor trust plan
Proposal to give investors added security with trusteeship over flagship resort
Dear all,
Harlequin Hotels & Resorts is pleased to announce that it plans to work with investors to create a trust that would give them security over all of the parts of the Buccament Bay Resort that are not already allotted to investors’ properties.
Investors would be invited to become members of the trust, which would hold a charge over the remaining registered land at Buccament Bay Resort, including all of the facilities. Although the trust would initially be open to Buccament Bay Resort investors, there is potential for it to include all investors.
The trust’s charge would not affect purchasers who are completing on units within Phase 1a of the resort as those properties have already been subdivided to enable them to receive their deeds on completion. It would also not impact on development, general running of the resort, nor the introduction of external finance.
Members of the trust would be represented by carefully selected trustees, who would be chosen based on their skills and experience relevant to hotel development.
The move is the first part of Harlequin’s restructuring process to be announced, with more news expected in the coming weeks.
Dave Ames, Chairman of Harlequin Hotels & Resorts, stated it was crucial that investors feel secure following a period where the Harlequin group had come under a lot of criticism as part of an orchestrated negative media campaign:
“My top priority has always been to take care of our investors, so I’m delighted we can announce this plan to give people greater security. This is a positive step forward that will benefit investors all-round as the confidence it brings will also assist with acquiring external finance, which will accelerate the continued development of the resort.
“The Prime Minister of St Vincent and the Grenadines has assured me that the new international airport will open next year, so I am keen that construction recommences at the resort as soon as possible.”
In the coming weeks, investors will be asked to consider legal advice on the proposed trust with a view to signing up as members as soon as possible.
Sincerely,
Harlequin Hotels & Resorts
“My top priority has always been to take care of our investors, so I’am delighted we can announce this plan to give people greater security”
Another promise of nothing. Quite amazing how Ames manage to buy time, Would any investor believe a word what he says? And what kind of a Lawyer can agree on such an impossible transaction. All the problems remains, this is just another attempt to fool investors.
Apparently Fatchett has no idea of what he has got himself into. This is another try to force the poor investors who has paid deposit on the cabanas to close with final payment. Not me.
Ames and Fatchett are you two fraudsters havin a giraffe mate.
This is getting better and better by the minute. FATSHIT told us yesterday that investors would have security over the 19.05 acres with the exception of the first 50 units to be completed.
Ames tells us this evening that the security is over the ” all of the resort ” with the exception of those areas allotted to investor properties. Ie the units (cabanas, apartments).
Ames clarify’s what he means by all of the resort. (THE REGISTERED LAND). See Buccament Bay covers some 33 acres but only 19.05 acres is registered. The same 19.05 acres that FATSHIT stated was in the trust yesterday. Oh sorry with one exception, yesterday only 50 units were to be excluded from the trust. Today all units are excluded.
Now who’s show is this. The FATSHIT show. Or the AMES show. See Ames says investors will be invited, and Fatchett presumably is charging his clients for the privilege.
Now for the really bizarre bit.
Ames tells us the “Members of the trust would be represented by carefully selected trustees based on their skills and experience relevant to Hotel Development.” Excuse me ? . Is this an advert for a management position for Harlequin ?
Who is doing the selecting ? Ames ?
FATSHIT is taking clients for an absolute ride here.
This is not a joke. This is disgusting.
This just gets better and better. Over on the RL site, RL are to write to Harlequin selling agents to urge them to engage investors in the security / trust structure. RL have tweeted this as well.
Fatchett is suing all Sipp providers. I wonder how many clients he will glean from this little trawl. Fatchett knows he is triggering the liquidation of Harlequin. If the SIPP providers insurances companies pay out on Fatchett’s claims they will come after Harlequin for their redress, they will probably find the trust is illegal based on an unsecured creditor preference, so bang there goes the security.
Fatchett has been telling investors that the insurers will not claim against Harlequin. Give it to us in writing.
Fatchett is leading many investors down a dead end. There is no rescue. Never was.
Aren’t we all the experts all of a sudden, come on Ralph, grow a pair.
I was said by someone the other day, there would be an explosion of negative PR against Reg Legal – here we go.
And your plan is?????
liquidation. So, Paddy who has nicked our money gets off with the legal action Ames has started – good plan if you are some thieving Irish builder?
Ames is no better, has anyone else got a better option?
It is sheer mania to think that the SIPP insurers would not go against
Harlequin. And those insurers are generally multi-nationals with
very, very deep pockets. Could not agree with you more Anon 8:49.
I am not an expert but do have a little common sense.
Question 1
Why would some people want to liquidate Harlequin?
Question 2
What do they stand to gain?
Question 3
The same people have just started to attack Reg Legal, could they be related?
Why would any investor, unless they are unstable want liquidation?
Unless someone comes up with 500 million +. There is no plan. Harlequin is a toxic brand. The Ames family are a toxic family and anyone who comes into contact with them becomes infected. The Ames are akin to Rabid dogs and need to be put down.
Everyone is looking for a plan. There is none. It needs to be liquidated.
Wow, more inspiration, I can hardly contain myself at the prospect of working on the trustee board.
Re-branding, I have had my creative box of wine.
We need to open a ‘fish’n’ chip’ shop – called yep ‘ Fat Chips’
The resort is absolutely crying out for a new bar, a themed bar, an Irish Themed bar – lets call it O’ Hallaran’s.
A retail establishment is needed, selling frozen stuff;
This will be named after Nikki Crozier 🙂
Of course no investor wants liquidation. But many want their money back. Many are facing hardship or have already faced their own personal liquidation.
Fatchett has already triggered the liquidation by instigating action on behalf of the SIPP clients.
Some really great ideas today, close it, don’t claim off the SIPP’s, stupid rescue plan, liquidation, moan about RL., moan moan moan – make me sick all of you.
But, no alternatives. What a very odd bunch of people you are – little bloody wonder is was so easy to take £400 million of you.
In 2009, Ames in his famous video , says that the Resort at BB grew from 19.4 acres to almost 100 thousand acres…I did not make this up…its still here on You Tube.
I dont know how anyone could look at this video, compare it to the situation today, and Trust anything now being said by the nice gentleman.
Previous comment should Should be “100” acres of course…not 100 thousand.
@Anonymous 9.39 pm.
Have you any solution please. Please.
So Fatchett advises people not to liquidate the scheme, and at the same time advises to investors to sue IFAs and SIPPs for advice on investing in such a shit scheme?
Well done everyone. Don’t spend too much on the champagne.
Ames states this will attract money which will “accelerate” development. That bloke just can’t help lying, and I bet he thinks all his Christmases have come at once.
RL advise that if investors liquidate, they get no money. If they go with RL’s scheme for BB clients to form a trust for ponds and paths at BB, the investments will be worth …. how much? No fucker knows, but it’s foolish and uncooperative to ask. Best to just wait, and do what the solicitor says.
Christ.
I guarantee you the restructure won’t help investors (not even the BB ones) and this scheme is never going to work. Primarily because all the money has gone and virtually nothing has been built but contractual liabilities are massive.
The most incredible part is that Ames is still a part of this. So we now have a bankrupt double glazing salesman and a solicitor addressing a multimillion pound development liability with no money left. Still, at least the solicitor isn’t trying to get anyone’s money back, but is trying to trouble shoot the scheme.
Christ.
From a purely business standpoint, it is clear this must be liquidated. I have never seen or heard of a business in the Caribbean so deep under water and trading as insolvently as this group of companies. It has a liability of 400m, as it has not completed the homes sold. Those deposits as liabilities, this is normal balance sheet recording in construction when contracts say money will be returned if units not complete. The only viable alternative would be to record as a liability the homes that have been sold and what is needed to build them out, which would be anywhere from 500m to 1.5bn. This group of companies have literally zero chance of getting out from this position of insolvency. Therefore, it must be liquidated and investors must move on. Do people really think a loss making resort will make the 1b profits required to move on? You will never get agreement from all owners, so this is essentially the situation. It is black and white. There is no better plan, as this is what Ames has brought the business to. It is noone’s fault but his, people who came along later are bit part players, they did not invent this outrageous scam. Insolvency and liquidation happens every day all over the world. Investors have asked for money back according to their agreements and it is illegal not to pay, and illegal to trade insolvent. Wake up to the reality that the money has gone, thousands may not get paid even in liquidation, but life is short and why wait and hope for what is literally impossible – deal with the reality and the situation and move on as best you can. Any lawyer advising otherwise is simply giving you the wrong advice. Most good lawyers would have taken a different approach and so some people have secured their position already. Ames has defrauded investors, and attention must be turned to him for redress, and absolutely not for help, assistance or a payout. He is not your friend or partner, but a criminal who has defrauded you and the longer you see him as anything else, the more time is being wasted.
Garreth Fatchett and RL have stated that they RL are not prepared to stump up the costs for valuations and surveys … they state at some point investors will have decisions to make with respect to costs associated with proposed trust. They state its a multi million pound issue.
So to get security over a few ponds and roads will cost investors even more, a lot more.
Great exit strategy for Fatchett. Fatchett tells the world he is going to put a gun to Ames’s head and force Ames to give security to his clients. Ames welcomes this with open arms, hijacking much of the PR surrounding the issue.
Fatchett gets his hands on the investor lists. Cherry picks the SIPP clients. Then states that not enough clients came forward to fund the multi million pound trust. States sadly that he had no option but to issue Stat demands. Throws Harlequin into liquidation and walks off with a thousand or so SIPP clients.
Nice work.
Loooks like Ames has been a good teacher to Fatchett, as he is now as crooked as Ames
Now RL has a reputation on the same level as HP
Good work Gareth
@Anonymous
September 14, 2013 at 9:34 pm SIPP claims.
First of all Harlequin have nothing to worry about if they have done nothing wrong, its the IFA’s that ‘sold it’.
However, if they have been misled by Harlequin – then of course they will chase HP and even the directors personally – live by the sword die by the sword an all that.
@Anon – reasons unknown
Why is it such a bad idea to sue the IFA and SIPP companies? Also, look as I may I can’t find the document that states the security is on a pond?
You do come out with some very silly statements.
Anonymous and Anonymous, it gets most confusing.
Just playing devils advocate 😉
Okay, lets just say I agree with the liquidation option, smash Harlequin to bits, close the resorts, sack the lot of the dam scoundrels.
‘ Yes I agree to the whole thing being liquidated’ Happy?
All the cash investors are absolutely buggered Happy?
The lucky SIPP investors will be running to Reg Legal waving their mis sold contracts in the air saying, please, please help me!!! It’s all gone wrong.
So Reg Legal will get the work one why or another, the cash investors and finance investors have always been in a very week position – pennies in the £ in a few years.
So, could someone please explain, rationally whats wrong with trying first?
NV – the problem with delaying liquidation with a loss making enterprise, which has no hope whatsoever of turning a profit is that there will be even less available for distribution when the inevitable liquidation finally comes to pass. Anyone who thinks that this latest “solution” has the remotest chance of success is quite clearly deluded. The project will fail, the companies will be liquidated and the investors will lose most of their money. Those who bought via SIPPs or following advice from a regulated adviser will potentially have strong compensation claims. The value of any security taken over the common parts of a loss making resort run by a basket case developer is minimal. In fact the trustees may even be presented with significant liabilities if the security was ever called in. The last few months have been an utter joke. The Ames/Fatchett stand off was two bald men fighting over a comb.
@Kroll, how do you know that BB is not making a profit?
The asset is the resort so it’s not going anywhere is it? Maybe removing the basket case(s) is the solution?
A couple of years ago, Harlequin via its GM Mark Sawkins stated they were losing US$1m per month. The fact is, the reported low occupancy by those on island, as well as guests in their comments even during high season, combined with the rates out there, and with the BB running costs, the resort cannot but be losing money. However, it is more worrying that investors have not been given any financial statements in 3 or 4 years which is outrageous. @NV, what precisely is being tried to turn the business around, to build out the 6000 units not yet started, to get planning permission etc? You all really think Ames, even with best will the world, with his total lack of all experience in the related field and with his track record to date, is capable of doing anything? No chance anyone will lend to such a lop sided balance sheet, no audited accounts, investigations ongoing, a Chairman who is a proven liar etc Any other thought is delusional.
But Anon you don’t know, Kroll doesn’t know either.
We know that Buccament bay cannot pay their bills and wages and are far behind with payments to suppliers, we also know that they are selling assets bought by investors money,( how can you, FDNRM allow this to happen ) just to meet some payments. FDNRM, a healthy company with profits would not owe money right, left and center and would not sell the assets brought in to be used for expansion.
It would be a piece of cake for Ames to send out a profit and loss statement to prove if Buccament Bay operation has positive cash flow or not. But so far no audits and nothing to show a profitable operation. Fatchett should know those things before he proceed with any commitments on behalf of investors including FDNRM. It should be part of any due diligence.
@ p & l. I would not believe everything you read on here about non payments, selling assets etc.im not sure I understand what is meant by “how could I allow this to happen” . The running of BB has nothing to do with me.
Profit and loss?
How do you know the DD has not been done? How do you know what BB is making or losing? – you don’t so why guess?
What’s your recommendation? now let me guess ………Liquidation 🙂
Matt Ames will be replace very soon at BB, even DA knows he has not done a good job.
Most of you need to wake up.
Invested by a SIPP – could be OK
Invested cash or finance – in deep shit
The 10% return will never happen- ever
The interest payments will not start again, ever
Ames is not sitting on millions
Liquidation will more likely happen than not
So that is the real situation without any fanny. Anything else is just bullshit this is the truth a I see it
When electricity service gets cut to your Resort for non payment of bills, it means you are “scrunting”
When local suppliers such as Gonsalves Liquor don`t give you credit…you are “scrunting”
When unpaid contractors are compensated for work done by giving them building equipment, you are “scrunting”….
When you run out of Filet steaks for your Steakhouse restaurant, you are “scrunting”.
When you start selling tiles and furniture , assets of the resort still under construction, you are “scrunting”
When the GM and several top level employees walk away from their jobs because of unpaid salaries, you are “scrunting”.
When you have to place your son, charged for major fraud in the UK,and with no Hotel management experience, to manage your Resort, you are “scrunting”.
Whoever believes that this wannabe 5 star resort on a fake white sand beach in a mosquito infested bay, with no real management, and no adequate airline service, and “scrunting”, will provide them with a return on their investment is absolutely crazy.
PS.. Caribbean meaning of “scrunting”…Seeing Hard Times….or “Catching Ass”
So Audrey Dixon AKA Elizabeth Dixon AKA Elizabeth Crozier rears her ugly head under the guise of “The Truth” now?
You told us all about your missing fanny when you were gloating about the freezing order. Go and chase someone else’s ambulance, or even better go back to Spain and explain to the court what you did with all those millions you took in a very similar scam to this one – the arrest warrant is still out against you isn’t it?
@ Wot no Ralph
“The asset is the resort”
Agreed, but an asset is only worth what what it can achieve in the market.
I am not sure what value the common parts of a resort would be. Who else would want to buy it? That would depend on who the operator of the resort is and their relationship with the trust that owns the common parts.
It’s all as clear as mud.
@Yatinkiteasy, what is the word in the Caribbean for 5* review on trip advisor?
@FDNRM Fake
@The village idiot
In English the word is duplicitous…
What the bit about Matt Ames kids being out of control? Dont tell me THAT was true but everything else is fake? Muppets
@ Anonymous, I really think ‘fake’ is more correct, there are few in the Caribbean who could even pronounce duplicitous, let alone form a meaningful sentence with it.
Going with the same theme (pronounced ‘team’ in the Caribbean), the approbate word might be ‘shady,’ or even ‘two faced.’
Regardless of where you’re from, the meaning is the same, and the situation well understood.
Can we please stop the stupidity until the details Are released .?. can we for the last time stop the blame game? No wonder that little idiot got away with this rip off , we are all fighting each other.
What a load of whining fools . There is a chance now so shut up and listen
@FDNRM, some of the glowing reviews are real I’m sure. Some people like cheap wine in plastic glasses, and for many just getting out of the dingy housing estate they live on is enough to fill them with joy. For those people oysters, Shrimp, and farmed salmon are like paradise, even though none are native to the Caribbean waters, are imported frozen from the US, and have all flavour of moist popcorn.
You are all wasting your time. You cannot second guess a crook, takes a thief to catch a thief. His goal has been getting your money in his pocket, which he did with commissions.
Since it is Sunday and nothing is going to transpire one way
or the other re: Harlequin can someone in England please tell
me who killed Danny in Broadchurch – the BBC cliffhanger.
@trip advisor, and Matt Ames kids aren’t native to the Caribbean either. So your point is?
@annon Yes
Sean Ghent….
@Where’s Audrey? AKA Matt Ames 😉
I am not Nikki Crozier, if I was I would be happy at getting the freezing order and a free sex change.
With such detective skill to deduce who I am from a sentence – wow!!
Could you tell us who Ralph is
@yatinkiteasy
That makes Ames a scrunt!
Such excitement in my design studio, I am positively jumping for joy.
The retail complex, I have it all worked out.
1.A fake tan shop with sunbeds and botex
2. A whole plethora of teeth whitening products
3. Golf buggy customizing
4. A wine shop only selling Rose wine
5. Kebab shop
6 A children’s prison for Matt Ames kids
More to follow…….
@The Truth, The freezing order hasn’t gotten anyone their money back though has it? So that was a strikeout.
Sadly sex changes aren’t free, but with the 91,000 pounds you took off those naive investors you can finally afford one. Then you can finally become Bruce Crozier. Those annoying Spanish police will never find you. No fanny.
Who gives a toss who is who . I paid my money to David Ames and it is David Ames who will pay me back. I don’t give a flying f… About anyone else .
Yes well anyone completing will have to think of ways to make money I seem to remember being told that I would make 30k a year? as each unit would rent out for £1,000 a night? so we all know you can go to BB for around £1,200 a week, Blu £1,000 a week, take of all the costs flights,food, staff wages,ect what income would one expect to receive?
Not sure about Nikki Crozzier she did seem all woman when I met her
but one thing is certain she deffo has more balls than Gareth Fatchett.lol
There won’t be any income because there won’t be any investors to complete , we will all be dead of old age before this shit is sorted
Any one thought of putting their cabanna up for sale on Ebay?
Maybe we should get Ames to do it with BB then we would get a true valuation
Can’t sell what what you don’t own , oh shit that’s wh Ames did………………. We are doomed I
It time to say where the bodies are buried…. So we finally know the truth about buccament bay
We know the truth My cabana is worth £1 I owe 70%completion money so I will send my 70p tomorrow.
The general feeling on the RL blog: lynching would be too good for Mr Ames – he is hated.
What about a rescue plan whereby he steps aside and a company who know what they are doing steps in? With a board of trustees?
Cash investors would get very little back, but they won’t in a liquidation either?
If security is given over all resorts then the toxic toad steps aside – that could save him a few years in the nick?
How is that for an idea?
Brilliant idea but it blows out the mortgage people totally. They are totally lost.
@The tracing board aka Paul Walton
It has fuck all to do with you you are getting a refund from your financial advisor so mind your own fucking business.
Also most people who are not shagging Ames want him in prison for as long as possible it is not up to you or GF to decide Ames fate
@Richard Hannay – they always have and always will be totally lost, its a pity but also a fact.
I love Ames package AKA Potty mouth.
No need for such vulgarity, It’s the courts that decide such things
I can see this , I think the lawyers should be clearing this up and if you are correct telling them straight. No point to hide it to many things have been hidden . AMes is a bastard for doing this, some will loose their homes in u.k
Where is Ralph and FDNRM late for experts hour!!!
Walton is being proposed by Fatchett as a trustee for the investors trust. Ames will need to approve all trustees. Just in case one might question Ames.
Walton who produced the damning report ???? on Buccament Bay. The report which never surfaced. Walton who claimed on RL that he had obtained redress from his IFA Sipp trustee.
No, Nikki/Elizabeth/Audrey Crozier/Dixon is not hot stuff Erica/Ralph lol,lol. You are mistaken. Lol. Audrey is clearly the one doing most of the typing as it is mostly coherent, lol (that’s for you Erica, Nicky/Elizabeth/Audrey has better grammar, but no fanny sadly…..lol…..)
I am deeply saddened that “Ralph” is just you two (Yes Erica, that is two, not too, or to…..lol…). I would like nothing more than for Ames to be taken down and be brought to account for his dealings but “Ralph” is just a load of shit and has no new information since Erica/Nicky was/were (that’s for you Erica….lol…) gifted access to the “Way Back Machine” on these forums. You have nothing new since “Harlecon” and it has become patiently obvious. Cut the crap.
You two will make a lovely couple, and I wish you all the best (but no Fanny…..watch out for the fanny!). I hope Nicky/Elizabeth/Audrey pays for all your holidays and you have a bright future together.
Meanwhile, back in the real world, there’a a Ponzi scheme to unravel.
What Ponzi scheme ? Gareth has found a solution to solve all the issues ,apart from the mortgage people who are in trouble. I think it’s time you all show your gratitude and stop acting like spoilt children.
I would be happy if Paul and Erica where on the board of trustees as without their work we would all be non the wiser.
why would somone attack nikki corzioer unless you had a freezing order against you
its matt ames
Monday Morning 🙂
Have all ten of us come up with a solution yet?
The more we hesitate the more likely liquidation.
Ames has no other income apart from completions ( if you believe that) or paying customers (its off peak now)
If I was Seven Capital I would just wait a little longer and pick it up cheap and F**k you lot.
In good company with Ames
http://www.companydirectorcheck.com/paul-anthony-walton-2
A cautious approach:
http://www.ftadviser.com/2013/09/16/investments/alternative-investments/harlequin-restructuring-to-see-resort-land-placed-in-trust-olg841hWiU3pk4ggN4EcgL/article.html
@anonymous – of course it the Ames family they attack everyone who has a small chance of uncovering their crimes .
Jeremy Newman – told the truth- Attack
Wilkins kennedy – Saw the real Figures and knew they coudnt lie more for Ames – Attack
Paudie Ohalloran-Sidelined a million on advice but knew the truth -Attack
Erica Broughton- wouldnt shut up, even when threatened by the pet lawyer- Attack
Paul Walton – tried to give a balance to the proceedings – Attack
Nikki Crozier / Chris Corney – freezing order on ames personally – Attack
Gareth Fatchett – fought every which way and stuck with it – Attack
Everyone is a liar and a defamer except the illustrious Ames family who stole the money .
Who cares anymore …….its all published for those who can read for those that cant your screwed ……………simples
Our solution cash investors get your heads together its saveable if you act now . sipps go after your advisers , mortgage people , thank you for attending appointments are avaliable at London bridge for you to jump off but Tower bridge is full for the next three weeks .
All,
Update
We have been closely monitoring our forum and the external Barbados Free Press. What is very concerning is the level of speculation and incorrect information put out.
Many investors are vunerable as they have taken on debt to buy their investment. Many of these people cannot afford the debt repayments (due to the lack of finance payments). There are very few people who understand the technical aspects of creating security over the land at Buccament Bay. Sadly, there are many people happy to make mischief. To what end ?
Let us make things very clear. If the investors are not in general agreement then Harlequin will end up in liquidation.
Investors are not going to re-finance Harlequin. There is no appetite from investors to add say an extra 10% of their purchase price to achieve the re-financing. Therefore, if external finance is to be provided it needs to be placed into a “stable” Harlequin.
Harlequin is anything but “stable” at the moment. The bulk of investors have no idea what to do next. Some are very angry and most are very confused.
No money = liquidation.
Security
Before we negotiated a security arrangement, investors had nothing to protect their interests. The reality is that any security arrangement is better than nothing. Nothing is what investors currently have.
The security net is limited to Buccament Bay. However, the door is open to wider security. The Questionnaire we have published suggests to us that investors want wider security. We anticipate that we will be asking for confirmation to a wider security by the end of this week.
Valuation of Harlequin Assets
In normal circumstances, we would advise that the assets being taken under security are valued. However, we do not have either the funding or the mandate to instruct a third party valuer to do this work. Little point in people asking for valuation reports and then becoming unhappy when we cannot provide them.
It has been suggested that Mr Ames / Harlequin pay. Very simply, they do not have the spare cash to fund this work.
Contact with Investors
We need to speak to investors and provide an explanation to them of the technical aspects of any security arrangement. In order to do this, we are going to need access. We have 1200 people on this site. However, we need to speak to the balance. There is no way any restructure will work if the advice element is left to Harlequin (who most people have lost confidence in) or their Agents (who are not trained lawyers).
We have a law firm in Saint Vincent ready to check the security documents provided to us by Harlequin. They need to have a client to instruct them.The creation of a trust is a task that RL will take upon itself to construct.
Investor “Opt In”
In order to give the trust a purpose, it will need to hold the asset (security) and have a beneficial class (investors).
Investors are going to need to “Opt In”. This will require the signing of legal documentation specific to their circumstances.
This job of work will require us to draft approx. 9000 documents and to review the same number of signed contracts. The logistics of this are going to require a large effort on our part.
We cannot do this without the goodwill of investors and / or the assistance of Harlequin. Additionally, if all we do is come under sustained attack for seeking to assist, we will withdraw and allow someone else to take control of this situation. We suspect that no one else will come forward as the whole situation is perceived as toxic.
The reality is that without investor being organised and together, Harlequin will fail.
A financier would be able to buy from a liquidator without having to deal with any investor. This is what will happen if this process is not completed.
Investor Meetings
Once we have contact, we will put on investor meetings. These meetings need to happen sooner rather than later. We are hamstrung until we have the ability to contact investors. Once again, over to Harlequin.
Next Steps
We are going to impress on Harlequin the need to allow us access. We have the practicalities to deal with.
We are going to need to pay the Saint Vincent land tax (to put the security in), we are going to need to make a decision on whether formal valuations be obtained (and how that be funded) etc.
Conclusion
We are going to report to all Investors this Friday. The substance of our Update will be the progress we have made in being able to carry the logistics out.
Regulatory Legal Solicitors
The collective ralph
Does it not make sense then to join forces with RL, I agree with you comments. It sounds like RL will chuck the towel in if they get pissed off and hoover up the pieces later.
Who could blame RL if they just waited until it went tits up and sat back and let the investors come to them? Easy work.
Ames is F****ed personally, business and family.
The Major Press need to get a grip of this, bring it to the masses.
Why are they not doing anything its the UK version of Maddoff.
A disgrace – Ames has not money to sue you – do something?
it feels like HP are dying, can someone put a DNR (do not resuscitate) tag on them.
But no euthanasia I want a slow lingering deathfor them
@GG – Totally but not because of the underlying threat to withdraw which I hate , reminds me to much of the Ames attitude .I vote to give Gareth a chance BUT WITH ONE PROVISO- tell the mortgage people theres no hope
The collective ralph
But how do the cash investors get together? Ames won’t let RL near the customer names and addresses direct.
You don’t have them…. if you did they could not be used.
Anyone any ideas?
@The collective ralph
I’m not a cash investor, but I could weep for them.
Ames family will have blood on its hands because of this.
I have long understood cash ‘investors’ have little chance, its the finance one’s that have got no chance of getting there payments started again, makes me so angry.
AMES MUST HAND THE NAMES TO GARETH , HE HAS AGREED TO DO THIS AND I AM SURE HE WILL BECAUSE HE HAS NO CHOICE .
@ames and family
There will be no start up of finance payments again we have this from our investigations and also in writing from those involved . we are all angry and damaged but our inactivity is letting the Ames family escape justice
The Ames family is now as unstable as their model. Maybe RL can advise people how to come to an agreement with the various lending institutions?
The Consumer action group, is free – maybe worth a look?
@ ames and family – the clients we at the collective have spoken to which is a small proportion of them in fairness seems to point to a level of mortgage fraud and fibbing on applications through companies according to clients that were recommended by Ames .
RL or nothing ! That’s your choice.
Yep, don’t see any other legal firm in the game?
Don’t care who they are i really don’t.
The collective ralph
The old just sign your name on the form I will fill in the rest routine?
let me guess the firms have gone bust? Will the FSCS cover that I have no idea?
I assume you have sent the details to the SFO?
To be fair, RL cannot be expected to put in a multi million pound security package in for free. They need to do valuations, pay land taxes etc.
Investors need to grow up and man up. If not, they will lose everything.
No CAB style operation is going to touch this fast enough.
@karma , of course the sfo have everything the collective amassed .and yes R.L are the only game in town and the CPC/ CLC action is now closed to new joiners , no one has a clue whats going on with Magenta Claims exept a letter stating they had won a case in SVG .OUR INVESTIGATIONS COULDNT FIND ANY TRACE OF A CASE …………..
When it comes to buying time, Ames is the Master. This whole scam should have been taken down months, if not years ago!
Yes correct But as the clients couldnt be arsed……it still stands
Ames will probably win again to as this lot are apathetic
The collective ralph
Nikki Croziers freezing order
I hope that’s because the value of the order = the value of Ames and the fat old hags assets.
Well done NK
In the end Ames will kill the thing he loves most by his own actions.
And I am not talking about Dominique, his bit of stuff on the side.
@karma – she did well and give the Ames lot a kicking but at a price .No for the rest its Gareths turn to shine and our advice is to stick with him he is not making a mistake here , wolf in sheeps clothing …………………………
@The collective ralph, are you ‘the’ Ralph?
I’m just about to list my 500ml of stagnant, mosquito larvae filled pond water on eBay to see if I can recover my money that way. Does anyone know what it’s worth? I’m hoping about £200k.
@sid stop selling what you dont own …… its Amesish .
we are a group of people who have problems with Mr Ames and we will continue to provide information and support to investors .
The Ralphs are very clear that their interest goes beyond money. We want Ames finished. However we will take a step back for the purpose of the rescue for some clients to be saved .
Gareth (no teeth) Fatchett will never take an aggressive stance against Ames. Nor it appears will he act on instructions from some of his clients. Preferring to listen to Ames and Simon Terry. Simon we just heard the tapes. We ave you now matey lol. Your a fucking scum bag Terry, a fucking disgrace to your profession, we are full sure someone in the media will have a field day with this.
Gareth if you knew what was on these tapes you would take a different view of things, wouldnt you? Wouldnt you?
The tapes are a disgrace , how could that man purport to be a lawyer ?? Oh simon you idiot and a family man too , what can we say lets see what the express make of these….
perhaps we could transcribe them for bbfp?????
@Sid Is this the listing 330653545683 ?I think your starting price is a really good idea 9 watchers brilliant.I will not list mine yet I do not want to flood the market, Can I make a suggestion as to who to put on the cross??Good Luck
‘Flood’ the market 🙂
WAKE UP AND TAKE PROPER ACTION
To Fatchett and all investors. We all know that the work of a lawyer is not to be a businessman, they are there to protect and secure a potential deal on behalf of their clients. On the other hand lawyers should not make business decisions without proper instructions from their client.
Harlequin and Ames has lots of security to offer, the proposed security of 19 acres of land at Buccament bay, has the least value of all other securities available in the group.
So, Mr Fatchett why accept such an offer? Why don’t you go for Merricks Bay, St Lucia, The Hotel in St Lucia,. the unfinished Hotel in Barbados and the lands in Dominican Republic, not to forget the airplanes and all shares held by Mr Ames.
Why go for the security with the least value? It is quite scary to read that Ames just don’t have the money to pay for survey, we are talking about maximum 7500 US$. And this is the guy you will agree with on a rescue package for a billion dollar project.
Bear in mind that the security at Buccament will be more or less impossible to realize once it is time for such an action. Believe me if I say that I am not in favour of liquidation, I would love to see Buccament bay up and running with the support of the investors. But if the present course is to take security only over some parcels of land at Buccament bay, Liquidation must be a better choice to end this mess before it gets worse.
The proposed action means that the real value will remain in Harlequins possession, this together with the power to manage the properties owned by Harlequin and the operation at Buccament bay is a design for disaster.
If Ames wants to do good, cooperate with investors who are on the right track by forming a trust to represent them. But why would they keep any of their assets? You the investors, have paid for all the lands and all the mistakes. Do not enter into any more costly mistakes.
Agree with him to step aside and take control of the operations, and appoint new management who can realize the existing assets, but do never give up on security issues, all assets and I mean all should be secured, it is your money.
Hello Mr Lars, I hear what you’re saying and do agree with you. To be fair to Fatchett he did say that taking some security of BB was only the first step and that he would be focussing on the other resorts going forward. Perhaps his plan is to get the trust set up and then develop it over time. Maybe establishing the trust is the first small step in much larger plan and he does intend to take the action you have suggested.
Fatchett, Ames is just another Victim.
Sent them to the solicitors regulatory authority then, he will be one man down
Mr Lars / Sid,
That is exactly what we said. We do not see anything other than all assets being adequate.
We need to deal with a number of jurisdictions and felt that establishing the trust and obtaining the “crown jewel” asset is the correct first step.
I am surprised that people feel that we are that naïve not to ask !
Ames famiml you have got some terrible times ahead, the old saying
” You reap what you sow”
But how are you to take action later? If an agreement is reached you have already agreed. If the first step includes to “maybe” take action at a later date it has to be in the agreement. Ames must approve such a plan. You cannot agree on something and two months later try a new round of negotiations. You have this opportunity and if Ames wants to “do good for investors” as he says, what is his problem to give security of all assets as they are all bought by the investors money.
It is as clear as the pope is catholic.
All those delays gives them time to fiddle around with assets, sell out equipment and inventory. You must take control, nothing will be left at the end of the day.
To me it is crystal clear that the potential trust should control all assets and if they wish to continue cooperate with Ames, fine. But take control and do it now.
The mainstream need to get on this
http://www.ifaonline.co.uk/ifaonline/news/2294855/harlequin-agrees-deal-to-put-investors-holdings-in-a-trust
Just go public, what the hell
Fatchett, The “Crown Jewel” is one of two liability of all assets. The cost of operation of Buccament Bay resort, exceeds the income.
The security offered has no value as it is only part of a resort, but not the resort itself. Who wants to own pathways and ponds in a resort that have problems to survive, One call to a professional valuator will tell you that.
It is easier for you to get security of the other properties as nothing has been built. So Why not?
I don’t trust Harlequin to contact all the investors, I don’t trust Harlequin even a little bit.
@Mr Lars,
The time delay to ask for the wider security will be very short.
It could be as short as a nano-second. What’s done is done.
CARPE DIEM !
Although this is old – http://thevincentian.com/ames-and-the-all-questions-abound-p598-1.htm the questions raised re ALL and the tax position of Harlequin are still relevant.
Ames will damage SVG just like anyone or anything he comes into contact with, you will be left with a ruin instead of a once beautiful bay.
Was the word a Scrunt – used yesterday?
Is it correct that the Trust is “Initially open only to investors in [Buccament Bay]…”?
That seems really weird, as the money that paid for the land and the construction at Buccament Bay appears to have come from investors in all the resorts.
I see RL have challenged Ames to come up with the list of investors, the missing 4800 or whatever the figure is?
Why would he say no?
SGD
I guess it was not easy getting Napolian syndrome to agree to BB, in his world its his, not investors.
Ames will not want to give the investor list to GF, if he say’s no – ask yourself what is he trying to hide?
The double selling and the resales
Then Karma is coming at a pace 😉
Cuddly Carol will be coming after Dirty Dave when she finds out about……Dominique the Dominatrix
£400 million sure can buy you pain.
Information / Action Update –
Following the court hearing last Thursday, we are now in a position where we understand the full extent of the land holdings and build costs for the various Harlequin projects.
The court hearing last week resulted in a settlement for our clients. The terms of which are confidential.
A few things are very clear :-
1. No agent went to the trouble of obtaining confirmation as to the land position.
2. No agent went to the trouble of obtaining Caribbean company information.
3. Some of the SIPP providers in the main relied on an external due diligence process in 2010 & 2011. We have confirmation
We have both the land acquisition schedule and an affidavit from the new Harlequin accountant setting out the build costs etc. We are currently running the maths to work out.
•HMSSE turnover 2006 – 2011
•less land acquisition costs
•less commissions -less building costs
•less overheads
This should give us an indication of the actual position of the group. There is no evidence of external investors (into the equity of the business) and no evidence of any development finance.
Once again we find it remarkable that agents / IFA’s/ SIPP’s have not seen this. These are accounting basics.
ACTIONS FOR DIRECT INVESTORS
We are not going to post our advice on open forum. If you are a direct investor and fall into one of these categories then please email us on harlequin@regulatorylegal.co.uk
Category 1
Buccament Bay Resort Limited investors
Category 2
Harlequin Property SVG Limited investors (to January 2009)
Category 3
Finance Agreement investors who have not received payments due to the “banking errors”.
Category 4
Others Resort Development Companies where completion has passed.
ACTIONS FOR SIPP INVESTORS / PENSION TRANSFERS
Very simply, it would be foolhardy to wait as Professional Indemnity Insurance stops immediately upon an insolvency procedure.
There are two claims to send. One to the IFA and one to the SIPP provider. We have a process for this which is straightforward.
1. We review the pension transfer advice
2. We review the SIPP contract
3. We then send the letters of claim to seek to trigger the PII.
CONCLUSION
We do not need to solicit work as investors are sensible enough to take precautionary steps. After all, if everything works out well, then nothing is lost.
We get resistance from both agents / IFA firms who continue to seek to justify their advice. A little difficult when it is obvious that the due diligence undertaken was the brochures, sale presentations and trips to SVG. Not really that objective !
The resistance will crumble shortly, particularly now the master agent has suspended selling.
Regulatory Legal Solicitors
£264 million taken in deposits between Buccament Bay and Merricks. £880 million in sales. Take the average sales price at £300,000 , this gives 2933 unit transactions between Buccament Bay and Merricks.
Fatchett has this information.
Simon Terry do you remember the email you sent to Mr. Ames just shortly after you joined Harlequin. The one just before project orange. The email following the email Dave Ames sent to 10,000 agents, purchasers and potential purchasers about SIPP’s.
We have the email. We also have the “Tapes” yes Gareth the “Tapes”. Simon you are pure scum.
The trolls are busy today posting crap on several old posts so as to have the Harlequin threads disappear from Recent Comments list.
Dear Mr. Fatchett, I would like to know when you intend to stop the Charade. You sent the above letter on the 14th of March 2013.
You claim that the security you are seeking is over all the assets of Buccament Bay with the exception of the 50 units being completed on. Then you prattle on about the need to pay for the Alien Landholders Licence.
Lets look at the figures. Ames has claimed that Buccament Bay is worth £170 Million.
You are discounting the 50 completions @ circa £14 Million. (Avg price per unit £400,000 less deposit previously paid £120,000. Balance due to Harlequin £280,000. × 50= £14 million.
The Ames valuation £170 million minus the 50 completions £14 million. Leaving a balance of £156 million. Legal costs and Alien Landholders licence @ 10% (£15.6 million) Cost of security to investors £15.6 million.
If RL get every investor in Buccament Bay to agree to the trust, 1100 investors, each investor will have to contribute £14,181.00 each to establish the trust.
Fatchett knows it cannot work. Fatchett why don’t you just ask Ames for details of all the SIPP purchasers. That is what you are really after. The SIPP contracts so you and Pannone can sue the pension providers.
Ralph, will you stop saying we have this, we sent that, just do something upload them because I think for some odd reason you get off on this.
You have F***k all. if you have prove me wrong……
I have a tape of one of the Ames in a compromising position, Fatchett has it…. see anyone can MAKE UP STORIES- pillock
@Anon
September 16, 2013 at 8:52 pm
All experts,
What if the 50 completions are all in block 2? still £400,000?
I take it you are a fully trained solicitor or accountant?
Skilled in setting up offshore multi jurisdictions trusts perhaps?
What’s the problem suing scum?
You just made yourself look a bit thick.
Ames you have no way out of the mess you have put your family in.
Project orange , now there’s a funny story “how do I stop the serious fraud office kicking down my door”? Oh don’t worry Mr Ames we will sort out the contracts so idiot investors have no legal claim……..and lo and behold the pied piper did as he promised and Dave of orange sold his wares to the band of 6000.Dave of Orange was so delighted he failed to pay the Piper his fee and in a cruel twist of fate Della the Piper was forced to use the very system he denied the 6000…..
WTF is going on here? Do we have a rescue or not? Do you intend to do what you say? Or are you just messing again……
I will pay your dominatrix treble to whip the shit out of you if this is another scam from you!!!
DLA Piper and unpaid fees? I seem to recall Harlequin were taking DLA Piper to court over that (yes, that way round), then it mysteriously dropped of the judicial radar.
Yeah yeah, Ralph just do something okay we can all make up silly shitty stories, we all know about Project Orange.
If you have the tapes / the emails stop fucking about and post them – talk about cry wolf.
Sad sad life you have pretending to be the great i am – twat
@MD —-Does it have a corn cob on the end?
You villain you’ve been peeking again !!!!
Looks like Ames don’t like his sexploits being splashed around and put BFP under attack with spam.
Hi garcinia cambogia with hca, you could say it’s a paid theme. We don’t know exactly what it’s cost us so far, but think it’s somewhere in the region of £400m.
When Ames agrees to this security on all resorts (he will) why do you think your needed?
I hear he likes a bit of spam. He pays Mistress Domonique to roll it into the shape of a large cucumber and go to town on him.
In a very odd sort of way I feel sorry for FDNRM, when this falls over and 7capital , or whoever buy it for pennies.
FDNRM will go cap in hand to Dave Ames and say , remember you said you would look after me?
Ames will get all tactile and say, if it wasn’t for that irish builder……
The reg legal survey results should be interesting
All,
Can you undertake our survey please.
https://app.icontact.com/icp/sub/survey/start?token=800aff629b7f0d0a0c07c26c0a919cfc&sid=303334&cid=152652 – click on survey link.
In order to ensure that we convey investor views we need to have the largest investor sample possible.
Thank you in anticipation.
It’s a mistake to under estimate Fatchett, I did and it cost me almost everything.
He can turn on a dime in a split second and come at you from a completely new direction; his connections are far reaching.
Such joy, I am cock a hoop, so little time!! so much to do!!
Some absolutely fab ideas for BB
Mistress Domonique – will open up a ‘Gentlemans club’
Dave Ames will give over 60’s ‘Titanic’ sex lessons
Carol will open a gastric band clinic
Matt Ames will run parenting classes
Dan Ames…..errr come back to him.
I will be Mr Ames man servant
Simon Terry LLB.Hons.
Please do not concern yourselves about my wellfare I also have a copy of the recordings I also record everything. I know I behaved badly and would like to publicly apologise for my behaviour I was under a lot of stress at the time.I understand I will never be able to practice again.
My Wife has now left me and I now have to get in front of Dave more
@Mistress Domonique
September 16, 2013 at 9:49 pm
Does Ames owe you anything or are you still paying off the little luv nest he got for you?
More to follow…………………
Tapes! Tapes! not THOSE tapes!
For Dave
I’m a cash investor on Merricks and I’m also a client of RLs, I would urge all Harlequin investors to contact Regulatory Legal Solicitors.
They can’t perform miracles but they are working for all investors.
The agent who sold me my unit has made a affidavit stating his manager told him the Harlequin accounts were checked and verified by his bosses each month.
The authorities have been notified…..
Lots coming out of the woodwork…
Ames has stiffed too many people to come out of this.
His personal assets frozen – well done Nikki ;), his childrens will be next – they only had one income stream……………… muppets like us who fell for all the fancy pictures and celebrity endorsements.
DLA Piper
http://www.dlapiper.com/uk/
Project Orange advisers.
All a bit of a Coggle …………………
If you only know Simon what we have……..
It is interesting how FDNRM has suddenly gone awfully quiet – some sort of reality check perhaps.
It’s becoming increasingly difficult to make sense of what direction this is all heading in – lots of conflicting information and messages.
One thing that does seem fairly clear, is that the blame game has to stop.
@Anonymous
It’s actually very clear.
If the deal with RL is not agreed, it’s over for Harlequin and any cash or finance investors. They have lost the lot.
RL, made their position clear Monday; any messing from Ames and they are off; why should they sully themselves with a toxic little man like him.
He is doing this to save his scrawney little wrinkled old arse not for investors.
There is no blame game. It is Ames who set up Harlequin, is its chairman and owner of most of the companies. It is therefore entirely his fault that he paid massive commissions to advisers, set up a model that never had any chance of coming close to working, filled his own pockets, lied profusely for years etc. Was it anyone else’s fault than Madoff that his business was a sham, or Stanford? Ames has to face the music.
Ames will face the music – that you can be sure off. Investors are not frightened by him, its the other way round.
Matt’s going to prison, Ames will lose the whole family properties.
Ames will try anything to avoid that – the SFO are slow, but when they make a move they will have a watertight case.
And he will. I agree with ‘Deluded Dave… its all Okay’. Ames has crossed too many people to walk away without paying the price.
Matt Ames has been told he is no longer required to be the General Manager.
Daddy stuffed little chubby son!
Pay The Piper LLP!!
Not massively confident in the SFO. Have been some high profile failures of late. Let’s hope they get this one right.
@ never again- Fatchett must have something cos he’s shite at lawyering
Fatchett can run fast and for long distances.
That’s reason in itself.
Gareth Fatchett now has a “new” forum just for people who have signed up with him? but still want the rest of us to provide info why? is that to give it straight to Ames? maybe the truth will find its way out but it will not be with any help from him. Gareth is just in this for the money and the detail from Ames of every SIPP investor.
BFP – I believe maybe there might be too many posts on this
thread. For the past hour the number of posts hasn’t lined-up
with the times. Are you culling? Otherwise this continues to
be the major source of information: Harlequin vis-a-vis the
Islands.
@Anon 4.29, I’d be disappointed if Fatchett wasn’t in it for the money. Any lawyer who would take on anything as complicated as HP without expecting a significant reward couldn’t be any good.
@Sid,
Have you no problem in Harlequin giving or selling your data to anyone??
ANYONE THINKING OF COMPLETING THINK AGAIN
http://www.fca.org.uk/news/speeches/update-to-information-investments-harlequin-management-services
Hi there; yes I’m culling some of the spam posts from sex ads etc. but there’s too many here any way. I will start a new discussion place.
Robert
NOTICE: Comments on this article have been closed off. To discuss Harlequin matters, please go HERE