BBC advises Muslim suicide bombers on optimum bomb placement, size & altitude for detonation
Thanks to an extensive study and actual field tests by the publicly-funded BBC, Muslim terrorists and their bomb makers now know that they haven’t been using enough explosives to bring down a Boeing 747. They also now know where to better place the bomb and what altitude it should be set off at for maximum effect.
No doubt the Muslim homicide bombers and their evil leaders will shout “Praise Allah” after watching the BBC video that explains where they’ve been going wrong.
Read the BBC story Boeing 747 survives simulated ‘Flight 253’ bomb blast and watch the video. Like the terrorists, you’ll learn that “underwear bomber” Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab wouldn’t have brought down Flight 253 on Christmas because even if he managed to set off the bomb, it simply wasn’t large enough or placed close enough to the outside skin of the airliner.
Al-Qaeda is undoubtedly saying “Praise Allah and the BBC for this information that will help us to succeed next time!”
When some BBC viewers questioned whether the experiment was valid given that the test aircraft wasn’t pressurized, the BBC even revised the article and provided additional information on bomb placement for greatest effectiveness and selecting the correct altitude for detonation to cause maximum damage.
PRAISE ALLAH for the assistance from the BBC!
The so-called journalists who wrote the article and organised the bomb test haven’t put their names on their work, but here are the photos and names of the two irresponsible and traitorous bastards who assisted the BBC in providing specific technical information to the Muslim terrorists…
Aiding Muslim terrorists: Dr. John Wyatt (left) & Captain J. Joseph
The BBC says Captain J Joseph is air accident investigator and Dr John Wyatt is an international terrorism and explosives expert who consults for the UN – United Nations. Traitorous bastards, both of them.
This irresponsible and traitorous BBC story and video is reminiscent of two episodes that happened during World War II…
Hedgehog Anti-submarine weapon
During the development of the “hedgehog” anti-submarine bomb, the British inventors didn’t know how much explosive to use. They knew how much it would take to sink a British submarine, but how much would it take to sink a German U-Boat? The problem was the British engineers didn’t know the distance from the deck of a German submarine to the pressure hull. The hedgehog would explode on contact with the deck of the German submarine, but had to have enough power to then rupture the pressure hull that could be between 2 feet and 4 feet under the deck. British sub specifications they knew, but what about the German U-Boats? How to find out?
Easy…. the Brits flipped through a bunch of German newspaper and magazines and found a photo of a German seaman loading torpedoes into a U-Boat. The seaman’s upper body was visible above the deck as he stood on the pressure hull. The Brits estimated his height and the distance of his body not visible and in this way accurately estimated the distance between the outer deck and the pressure hull. This was much less than the Brit subs and the designers were therefore able to use a smaller charge for the Hedgehog and throw it further.
They designed the hedgehog accordingly and it went on to be a major sub-killer – in no small part because the German propaganda photo allowed the Brits to select the proper size of explosive charge.
Congressman Andrew May - Revealed military secrets, killed 800 U.S. sailors
Japanese destroyers fail to set their depth charges deep enough when attacking American submarines
Congressman Andrew May (House Military Affairs Committee) was on a junket to Pearl Harbor and got a briefing on how the US subs were taking the fight to the Japanese and really starting to kick some tail by 1943. He was briefed on the following subjects:
• That the Japanese destroyers were not following up attacks.
• That the Japanese were setting their depth charges too shallow.
• That the Japanese depth charges were not packing enough “wallop” to breach the 1″ steel plating on US subs unless it was a direct hit.
Congressman May then held a press conference when he got home, relating the TOP SECRET information to the radio and newspapers, assuring the mother’s of submariners that their boys were safe. (Sounds like the BBC assuring travelers that they are safe on the 747!)
Of course, Japanese spies ALSO listen to the radio and read the papers, and they reported the issues to their bosses. Corrective action was soon applied, with a super depth charge of 600 lbs of TNT hitting their arsenal. Vice Admiral Charles A. Lockwood, commander of the U.S. submarine fleet in the Pacific, later estimated that May’s revelation cost the navy as many as ten submarines and 800 crewmen.”
I view the BBC’s article and video as no less stupid than Congressman May – to the point of treason.
Every person who worked on the BBC story should be charged with aiding terrorists.
… thanks to one of our readers who forwarded major portions of this story to BFP
Barbados Free Press 
“Every person who worked on the BBC story should be charged with aiding terrorists.”
Overkill, BFP. The senior editors who ran with the story and the two “experts” should be charged. The trial would be a lengthy and drawn out affair that would take months or years and cost millions in public funds. Cancel public support for the BBC and direct the dollars to the prosecution of these traitors.
I had read the original article in which the “research” had been criticised as it had not been conducted on a flying aircraft. I had myself thought that this research should not have been published, and certainly not now with new information which has factored in the consideration of a flying aircraft. I can’t believe the BBC can be so thick, and I would like to believe that this is somehow a ploy to get the terrorists to adapt their methods, and increase their likelihood of being detected and captured in the process.
Seriously? You think terrorists don’t *already* have this information?
If you search the net you can find the information needed to construct an atomic weapon. So should we ban the Internet?
The information you quoted about the underwear bomber was widely reported in all US media immediately after the fact. By your logic, those reporters all all traitors, as well.
Simply knowing the exact amount of explosive needed to down an airliner is not the point. Noted security expert Bruce Schneier said:
“The security checkpoints, even at their pre-9/11 levels, forced whoever made the bomb to construct a much worse bomb than he would have otherwise. Instead of using a timer or a plunger or another reliable detonation mechanism, as would any commercial user of PETN, he had to resort to an ad hoc homebrew — and a much more inefficient one, involving a syringe, and 20 minutes in the lavatory, and we don’t know exactly what else — that didn’t explode. ”
So how, exactly, is knowing that one needs a larger bomb going to make it possible to get even more fissile material past security, keep it hidden until the critical moment, and find a suitable detonator?
Please read Bruce’s entire column here: http://www.schneier.com/essay-304.html
Your WWII analogies are flawed straw man arguments and don’t logically apply to our current circumstances for too many reasons to rebut in a comment. But just to pick one, historians don’t even agree that the incident you cite with Congressman May ever happened.
Information security in a world war between nation-states is not remotely the same as during a campaign of terrorism.
In highlighting an already sensitive set of information, are you not adding to any potential damage? You are as bad as the BBC, yeesh!
Dan said Seriously? You think terrorists don’t *already* have this information?
I don’t know of any scientifically done full scale tests of PET explosive done by terrorists. Certainly none filmed, analyzed and put on the internet as a resource for other terrorists. If you can find a video like that please put the web address in the comments section because I’d love to see it.
The BBC filmed, analyzed and put the results on the internet along with an explanation of how altitude would have impacted the damage.
Dan, I think that the BBC video and tests provided new and useful information to many terrorists.
To Mr. Bourne: After BBC’s article and video the damage has been done. I agree with BFP’s point that the BBC was irresponsible to do the tests and to publish the story. Unless someone can show where terrorists already ran similar full scale tests on real 747 aircraft and put the information on the web, the BFP article is 100% correct.
Barbados Free press overkill as usual.
Every opportunity to take a dig at the “sub human” muslim, eh desmond and Allard?
Some interesting background on the underwear bomber and his wealthy and well-connected Nigerian dad here:
http://www.sott.net/articles/show/200443-Understanding-the-Panty-Bomber-Mythology
Pingback: BBC Traitors Assist Muslim Bombers | Conservative American News
Pingback: WTF??? BBC Explains To Terrorists Exactly How To Correctly Blow Up A Plane? « Are you Freaking Stupid?
Wid me British background, I deeply offended and insulted over de insulting suggestion of treason being commited by THE BBC.
But in fac’, I jus saying dat’.
Since long long time I have felt the BBC seems intent on destroying the UK by what it decides to indulge under the headings of Press Freedom. I’ve written them about it, but such letters get conveniently, … desaprobado, and you ner’ hear a reply.
Cript reply to : What will they think of next:
The only Muslims who deserve being classified as ‘Sub Human’ are ones who insist on behaving like that. The Pope too, though his are supposedly Chistian, seems to have collected a few ( Sub Humans) like that in his own flock.