Vote Fraud In New York City? Alarm As Hundreds Of Obama Votes Disappear Then Reappear!

The Dangers Of Computerized Voting Machines

From the New York Post…

Obama Robbed In NY

February 16, 2008 — Barack Obama’s primary-night results were strikingly under recorded in several congressional districts around the city – in some cases leaving him with zero votes when, in fact, he had pulled in hundreds, the Board of Elections said today

Unofficial primary results gave Obama no votes in nearly 80 districts, including Harlem’s 94th and other historically black areas – but many of those initial tallies proved to be wildly off the mark, the Board of Elections confirmed.

Truth is, in some districts getting a recount, the senator from Illinois is even close to defeating Hillary Clinton.

Initial results in the 94th District, for example, showed a 141-0 sweep for the New York senator, but Board of Elections spokeswoman Valerie Vazquez said today that the ongoing recount had changed the tally to 261-136…

… continue reading this article at the NY Post (link here)


Filed under Barbados, History, Political Corruption, Politics, Politics & Corruption

7 responses to “Vote Fraud In New York City? Alarm As Hundreds Of Obama Votes Disappear Then Reappear!

  1. Straight talk

    As Stalin said: ” It’s who counts the votes that win elections”

  2. GreenBB

    I (as an American) have never experienced the new computerized voting machines– but as compared to the various fiascoes with the old fashioned machines…I think they are far worse: with our own computers we are drilled, “back up, back up, back up,” the elderly are for the most part not computer savvy, and tampering or hacking seems possible. I don’t know what the solution is.

  3. Green Monkey

    …the elderly are for the most part not computer savvy, and tampering or hacking seems possible. I don’t know what the solution is.

    How about this concept, it seems to work pretty reliably in Canada and Barbados (two countries that I know of off hand which use it).

    When you go to the polling station, after you identify yourself and it is confirmed you are on the list of eligible voters, you get a piece of paper on which the candidates standing for election are listed. Then you go behind a shield so your privacy is protected and make an “X” with a pencil next to the name(s) you wish to vote for. That piece of paper is then folded and dropped into a box which is in the open and visible by everyone in the room and where all the other voters also place their little bits of paper with their votes.

    The whole process is monitored by scrutineers from the different political parties to ensure that nothing untoward can take place. Likewise at the end of the day, the ballot boxes are emptied and the votes counted out, again with scrutineers from the different parties monitoring the counting process to ensure that it correct and there is no interference in the process to add votes or steal votes from any of the candidates.

    With enough polling stations and staff 0n hand to count the votes the results can be tabulated and the official winners announced usually within 4 or 5 hours of the close of polling (as takes place in Canada and Barbados).

    How easy is it to hardware hack a Voting Machine?
    A couple of untrained 54-year old women from Black Box Voting bought $12 worth of tools and in four minutes penetrated the memory card seals, removed, replaced the memory card, and sealed it all up again without leaving a trace.

    The Experiment on an actual Diebold voting machine shows that the seals do nothing whatever to protect against access by insiders after testing, and the seals also are worthless in jurisdictions like Washington, Florida, California, and many other locations where voting machines are sent home with poll workers for days before the election.

    It’s no secret that Diebold’s electronic voting gear is, um, a little lax in the security department, and now a non-profit group known as the Open Voting Foundation has found “what may be the worst security flaw we have [ever] seen in touch screen voting machines” in the company’s older TS model. Apparently these devices — which produce no paper record of voters’ choices — contain a switch on the internal motherboard (pictured above, with handy onboard instructions) that would allow nefarious hackers to toggle between the two pre-installed boot profiles and “change literally everything regarding how the machine works and counts votes.” Even worse, the board also sports a slot for external flash memory from which a third profile could be “field-added in minutes,” allowing unsavory characters to overwrite certified files with their own data before switching the machine back to its unaltered state — with no one the wiser. It looks like Diebold has two options for addressing this nagging problem: either they can open up their machines and source code to a thorough external audit and adopt the resulting suggestions (unlikely), or they can take the simpler route and just get their friends in Washington make it illegal for rabble-rousers like the Open Voting Foundation to play with their toys.

    Did you know Diebold also makes automated banking machines. You know, the ones into which you insert your debit card and withdraw money from your bank account. It doesn’t have a problem producing ATMs which are secure, keep track of the banks’ and the bank customers’ money with no undue problems reported, and also produce hard copy print outs to verify the transactions on paper. Apparently they just can’t do the same with voting machines. Strange.

  4. GreenBB

    Green Monkey you are spot on regarding the efficiency with which the votes are tallied using good
    ‘ole pencil and paper.

  5. cherry2enpowered

    Green Monkey
    Nothing strange about the voting machines not being secure and accurate. The next President of the States have already been decided. What goes on a just an excercise in frutillity, a game but nevertheless it has to happen according to their constitution to keep the voters happy. Whether it is obama or hilary or cain, all that matters is the chosen one is the one that will work in the interest of the shawdow g’ment to advance its goals on the non suspecting masses. Anything else will be asassination, death or 1 term in office.

  6. Maat

    Judicial watch website lists both Obama and Clinton in their top 10 most corrupt politicians.

    Americans are free to choose between the Devil they know and……..


  7. Kyle

    I still think that America will never elect a Communists like Obama. I was pulling for him, really was…. But the latest developments with his images of Che Gueverra in his headquarters, coupled with his acceptance of financial donations from a man arrested for the 1981 bombings of the Pentagon and several district police stations makes him a very shady character.

    Not to mention, once released, that same said terrorist then sat on a board of directors with Obama, now lives in his neighbourhood, and (accoridng to his spokesperson) “is friendly with”. This is dangerous!

    Why doesn’t he distance himself from the racist farakhan? All these have been pushed aside, until now, finally the international news houses are acting up.

    The Obamaniacs will have to accept their leader is a Communist, his wife makes racist comments (could we assume she is [racist??]) and these aren’t the people that should be running the superpower.

    Anyone supporting “come from nowhere” senator voted as the most left-wing in the entire Senate is dangerous. His radical muslim communist oriented, terrorism based upbringing brings uncomfortable memories from the statements of Osama (not Obama) Bin Laden; If i recall correctly, he threatened the next time they attacked the US it would be from within. Meh, I could be wrong, my memory could be failing.

    Still, whatever it is, run for the hills. Better the broken marriage that is the “Billaries” than the racist communists that are the “Obamaniacs”.

    One final note, Obama wont accept funding from the “Special Interest” groups, reasoning that when he holds office in the White House he does not want to be owing to anyone any special favours…

    What about accepting money from a terrorist? What special favours will he owe then? Bomb the whitehouse and we’ll just call us even?!

    Read more at: